Lindelöf spaces which are indestructible, productive, or D

We discuss relationships in Lindelöf spaces among the properties “indestructible”, “productive”, “D”, and related properties.     

Measurable cardinals and the cardinality of Lindelöf spaces

We obtain from the consistency of the existence of a measurable cardinal the consistency of “small” upper bounds on the cardinality of a large class of Lindelöf spaces whose singletons are Gδ sets.     

Compact spaces, elementary submodels, and the countable chain condition, II

Given a space 〈X,T〉 in an elementary submodel of H(θ), define XM to be X∩M with the topology generated by . It is established that if XM is compact and satisfies the countable chain condition, while X is not scattered and has cardinality less than the first inaccessible cardinal, then X=XM. If the character of XM is a member of M, then “inaccessible” may be replaced by “1-extendible”.     

Fodor-type Reflection Principle and reflection of metrizability and meta-Lindelöfness

We introduce a new reflection principle which we call “Fodor-type Reflection Principle” (FRP). This principle follows from but is strictly weaker than Fleissner's Axiom R. For instance, FRP does not impose any restriction on the size of the continuum, while Axiom R implies that the continuum has size ?ℵ₂.We show that FRP implies that every locally separable countably tight topological space X is meta-Lindelöf if all of its subspaces of cardinality ?ℵ₁ are (Theorem 4.3). It follows that, under FRP, every locally (countably) compact space is metrizable if all of its subspaces of cardinality ?ℵ₁ are (Corollary 4.4). This improves a result of Balogh who proved the same assertion under Axiom R.We also give several other results in this vein, some in ZFC, others in some further extension of ZFC. For example, we prove in ZFC that if X is a locally (countably) compact space of singular cardinality in which every subspace of smaller size is metrizable then X itself is also metrizable (Corollary 5.2).     

Solution of Shapirovskii's question

Boris Shapirovskii posed the following question: “Suppose a continuous mapping from one compact space onto another is given. Suppose that the π-character of any point in the domain is greater than the weight of the target space. Will there be two disjoint closed sets in the domain mapping onto?”. There is a zero-dimensional counterexample (Corollary 12), but the one cardinal up version is true in zero-dimensional case (Corollary 14). Nevertheless, there always will be two disjoint open sets mapping densely (Theorem 7).     

On a core concept of Arhangel'ski?

Arhangel'ski? [A.V. Arhangel'ski?, Locally compact spaces of countable core and Alexandroff compactification, Topology Appl. 154 (2007) 625-634] has introduced a weakening of σ-compactness: having a countable core, for locally compact spaces, and asked when it is equivalent to σ-compactness. We settle several problems related to that paper.     

Different versions of a first countable space without choice

We show that two versions of a first countable topological space which are equivalent in ZFC set theory split in the absence of the Axiom of Choice AC. This answers in the negative a related question from Gutierres “What is a first countable space?”.     

The cardinal characteristic for relative γ-sets

For X a separable metric space define p(X) to be the smallest cardinality of a subset Z of X which is not a relative γ-set in X, i.e., there exists an ω-cover of X with no γ-subcover of Z. We give a characterization of p(ω²) and p(ωω) in terms of definable free filters on ω which is related to the pseudo-intersection number p. We show that for every uncountable standard analytic space X that either p(X)=p(ω²) or p(X)=p(ωω). We show that the following statements are each relatively consistent with ZFC: (a) p=p(ωω)<p(ω²) and (b) p<p(ωω)=p(ω²)     

Almost disjoint large subsets of semigroups

There are several notions of largeness in a semigroup S that originated in topological dynamics. Among these are thick, central, syndetic and piecewise syndetic. Of these, central sets are especially interesting because they are partition regular and are guaranteed to contain substantial combinatorial structure. It is known that in (N,+) any central set may be partitioned into infinitely many pairwise disjoint central sets. We extend this result to a large class of semigroups (including (N,+)) by showing that if S is a semigroup in this class which has cardinality κ then any central set can be partitioned into κ many pairwise disjoint central sets. We also show that for this same class of semigroups, if there exists a collection of μ almost disjoint subsets of any member S, then any central subset of S contains a collection of μ almost disjoint central sets. The same statement applies if “central” is replaced by “thick”; and in the case that the semigroup is left cancellative, “central” may be replaced by “piecewise syndetic”. The situation with respect to syndetic sets is much more restrictive. For example, there does not exist an uncountable collection of almost disjoint syndetic subsets of N. We investigate the extent to which syndetic sets can be split into disjoint syndetic sets.     

Fréchet-Urysohn for finite sets, II

We continue our study [G. Gruenhage, P.J. Szeptycki, Fréchet Urysohn for finite sets, Topology Appl. 151 (2005) 238-259] of several variants of the property of the title. We answer a question from that paper by showing that a space defined in a natural way from a certain Hausdorff gap is a Fréchet α₂ space which is not Fréchet-Urysohn for 2-point sets (FU₂), and answer a question of Hrušák by showing that under MAω₁, no such “gap space” is FU₂. We also introduce versions of the properties which are defined in terms of “selection principles”, give examples when possible showing that the properties are distinct, and discuss relationships of these properties to convergence in product spaces, to the αi-spaces of A.V. Arhangel'skii, and to topological games.     

Tychonoff expansions with prescribed resolvability properties

The recent literature offers examples, specific and hand-crafted, of Tychonoff spaces (in ZFC) which respond negatively to these questions, due respectively to Ceder and Pearson (1967) [3] and to Comfort and García-Ferreira (2001) [5]: (1) Is every ω-resolvable space maximally resolvable? (2) Is every maximally resolvable space extraresolvable? Now using the method of KID expansion, the authors show that every suitably restricted Tychonoff topological space (X,T) admits a larger Tychonoff topology (that is, an “expansion”) witnessing such failure. Specifically the authors show in ZFC that if (X,T) is a maximally resolvable Tychonoff space with S(X,T)?Δ(X,T)=κ, then (X,T) has Tychonoff expansions U=Ui (1?i?5), with Δ(X,Ui)=Δ(X,T) and S(X,Ui)?Δ(X,Ui), such that (X,Ui) is: (i=1) ω-resolvable but not maximally resolvable; (i=2) [if κ^′ is regular, with S(X,T)?κ^′?κ] τ-resolvable for all τ<κ^′, but not κ^′-resolvable; (i=3) maximally resolvable, but not extraresolvable; (i=4) extraresolvable, but not maximally resolvable; (i=5) maximally resolvable and extraresolvable, but not strongly extraresolvable.     

The connected Vietoris powerlocale

The connected Vietoris powerlocale is defined as a strong monad Vc on the category of locales. VcX is a sublocale of Johnstone's Vietoris powerlocale VX, a localic analogue of the Vietoris hyperspace, and its points correspond to the weakly semifitted sublocales of X that are “strongly connected”. A product map ×:VcX×VcY→Vc(X×Y) shows that the product of two strongly connected sublocales is strongly connected. If X is locally connected then VcX is overt. For the localic completion of a generalized metric space Y, the points of are certain Cauchy filters of formal balls for the finite power set FY with respect to a Vietoris metric.Application to the point-free real line R gives a choice-free constructive version of the Intermediate Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem.The work is topos-valid (assuming natural numbers object). Vc is a geometric construction.     

A non-D-space with large extent

We proved that ^?+ implies the existence of a non-D-space whose all closed subspace F satisfies e(F)=L(F). The existence of such a space under MA+¬CH or PFA is also discussed.     

Numerosities of labelled sets: a new way of counting

The notions of “labelled set” and “numerosity” are introduced to generalize the counting process of finite sets. The resulting numbers, called numerosities, are then used to develop nonstandard analysis. The existence of a numerosity function is equivalent to the existence of a selective ultrafilter, hence it is independent of the axioms of ZFC.     

Remote points in products under CH

Assume CH. Let I be any index set, and let Xi, for i∈I, be a completely regular ccc topological space of weight ω₂. If X=_∏i∈IXi is ccc and non-pseudocompact, then X has remote points.     

The prime dicompletion of a di-uniformity on a plain texture

Working within a plain texture (S,S), the authors construct a completion of a dicovering uniformity υ on (S,S) in terms of prime S-filters. In case υ is separated, a separated completion is then obtained using the T₀-quotient, and it is shown that this construction produces a reflector. For a totally bounded di-uniformity it is verified that these constructions lead to dicompactifications of the uniform ditopology. A condition is given under which complementation is preserved on passing to these completions, and an example on the real texture (R,R,ρ) is presented.     

Preservation of the Borel class under countable-compact-covering mappings

The aim of this note is to prove the following result: “Assume that X is a metric Borel space of class ξ, that is continuous, that every fiber f⁻¹(y) is complete and that every countable compact subset of Y is the image by f of some compact subset of X. Then Y is Borel and moreover of class ξ”. We give also an extension to the case where the fibers are only assumed to be Polish.     

Cosheaves and connectedness in formal topology

The localic definitions of cosheaves, connectedness and local connectedness are transferred from impredicative topos theory to predicative formal topology. A formal topology is locally connected (has base of connected opens) iff it has a cosheaf π₀ together with certain additional structure and properties that constrain π₀ to be the connected components cosheaf. In the inductively generated case, complete spreads (in the sense of Bunge and Funk) corresponding to cosheaves are defined as formal topologies. Maps between the complete spreads are equivalent to homomorphisms between the cosheaves. A cosheaf is the connected components cosheaf for a locally connected formal topology iff its complete spread is a homeomorphism, and in this case it is a terminal cosheaf.A new, geometric proof is given of the topos-theoretic result that a cosheaf is a connected components cosheaf iff it is a “strongly terminal” point of the symmetric topos, in the sense that it is terminal amongst all the generalized points of the symmetric topos. It is conjectured that a study of sites as “formal toposes” would allow such geometric proofs to be incorporated into predicative mathematics.     

QN-spaces, wQN-spaces and covering properties

The main results of the paper are as follows: covering characterizations of wQN-spaces, covering characterizations of QN-spaces and a theorem saying that Cp(X) has the Arkhangel'ski?ˇ property (α₁) provided that X is a QN-space. The latter statement solves a problem posed by M. Scheepers [M. Scheepers, Cp(X) and Arhangel'ski?ˇ's αi-spaces, Topology Appl. 89 (1998) 265-275] and for Tychonoff spaces was independently proved by M. Sakai [M. Sakai, The sequence selection properties of Cp(X), Preprint, April 25, 2006]. As the most interesting result we consider the equivalence that a normal topological space X is a wQN-space if and only if X has the property S₁(Γshr,Γ). Moreover we show that X is a QN-space if and only if Cp(X) has the property (α₀), and for perfectly normal spaces, if and only if X has the covering property (β₃).     

Productively Lindelöf and indestructibly Lindelöf spaces

There has recently been considerable interest in productively Lindelöf spaces, i.e. spaces such that their product with every Lindelöf space is Lindelöf. See e.g. , , , , ,  and , and work in progress by Brendle and Raghavan. Here we make several related remarks about such spaces. Indestructible Lindelöf spaces, i.e. spaces that remain Lindelöf in every countably closed forcing extension, were introduced in [28]. Their connection with topological games and selection principles was explored in [27]. We find further connections here.