Powerful numbers in (1ℓ + qℓ)(2ℓ + qℓ)⋯(nℓ + qℓ)

Let q be a positive integer. Recently, Niu and Liu proved that, if $n\ge \max ?\{q,1198?q\}$, then the product $(1^3+q^3)(2^3+q^3)?(n^3+q^3)$ is not a powerful number. In this note, we prove (1) that, for any odd prime power ? and $n\ge \max ?\{q,11?q\}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number, and (2) that, for any positive odd integer ?, there exists an integer $N_{q,?}$ such that, for any positive integer $n\ge N_{q,?}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number.     

Transcendence degree one function fields over a finite field with many automorphisms

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be the algebraic closure of a finite field ${\mathbb{F}}_q$ of odd characteristic p. For a positive integer m prime to p, let $F=\mathbb{K}(x,y)$ be the transcendence degree 1 function field defined by $y^q+y=x^m+x^{?m}$. Let $t=x^{m(q?1)}$ and $H=\mathbb{K}(t)$. The extension $F|H$ is a non-Galois extension. Let K be the Galois closure of F with respect to H. By Stichtenoth [20], K has genus $\mathfrak{g}(K)=(qm?1)(q?1)$, p-rank (Hasse–Witt invariant) $\gamma (K)={(q?1)}^2$ and a $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group of order at least $2q^{2}m(q?1)$. In this paper we prove that this subgroup is the full $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group of K; more precisely ${\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)=\mathrm{\Delta }?D$ where Δ is an elementary abelian p-group of order $q^2$ and D has an index 2 cyclic subgroup of order $m(q?1)$. In particular, $\sqrt{m}|{\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)|>\mathfrak{g}{(K)}^{3/2}$, and if K is ordinary (i.e. $\mathfrak{g}(K)=\gamma (K)$) then $|{\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)|>{\mathfrak{g}}^{3/2}$. On the other hand, if G is a solvable subgroup of the $\mathbb{K}$-automorphism group of an ordinary, transcendence degree 1 function field L of genus $\mathfrak{g}(L)\ge 2$ defined over $\mathbb{K}$, then $|{\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)|\le 34{(\mathfrak{g}(L)+1)}^{3/2}<68\sqrt{2}\mathfrak{g}{(L)}^{3/2}$; see [15]. This shows that K hits this bound up to the constant $68\sqrt{2}$.Since ${\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)$ has several subgroups, the fixed subfield $F^N$ of such a subgroup N may happen to have many automorphisms provided that the normalizer of N in ${\text{Aut}}_{\mathbb{K}}(K)$ is large enough. This possibility is worked out for subgroups of Δ.     

On the sub poly-harmonic property for solutions to (−Δ)pu < 0 in Rn

In this note, we mainly study the relation between the sign of ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u$ and ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p?i}u$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ with $p?2$ and $n?2$ for $1?i?p?1$. Given the differential inequality ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u<0$, first we provide several sufficient conditions so that ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p?1}u<0$ holds. Then we provide conditions such that ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{i}u<0$ for all $i=1,2,\dots ,p?1$, which is known as the sub poly-harmonic property for u. In the last part of the note, we revisit the super poly-harmonic property for solutions to ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u={\mathrm{e}}^{2pu}$ and ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u=u^q$ with $q>0$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$.     

Unique continuation for first-order systems with integrable coefficients and applications to elasticity and plasticity

Let $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^N$ be a Lipschitz domain and Γ be a relatively open and non-empty subset of its boundary ?Ω. We show that the solution to the linear first-order system:(1)$\mathrm{?}\zeta =G\zeta ,\zeta {|}_{\Gamma }=0,$ vanishes if $G\in {\mathsf{L}}^1(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{(N\times N)\times N})$ and $\zeta \in {\mathsf{W}}^{1,1}(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^N)$. In particular, square-integrable solutions ζ of (1) with $G\in {\mathsf{L}}^1\cap {\mathsf{L}}^2(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{(N\times N)\times N})$ vanish. As a consequence, we prove that:$???:{\mathsf{C}}_{°}^{\infty }(\Omega ,\Gamma ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)\to [0,\infty ),u?6\mathrm{sym}\left(\mathrm{?}u{P}^{?1}\right)6_{{\mathsf{L}}^2(\Omega )}$ is a norm if $P\in {\mathsf{L}}^{\infty }(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$ with $\mathrm{Curl}P\in {\mathsf{L}}^p(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$, $\mathrm{Curl}{P}^{?1}\in {\mathsf{L}}^q(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^{3\times 3})$ for some $p,q>1$ with $1/p+1/q=1$ as well as $\det P?c^{+}>0$. We also give a new and different proof for the so-called ‘infinitesimal rigid displacement lemma’ in curvilinear coordinates: Let $\Phi \in {\mathsf{H}}^1(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)$, $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^3$, satisfy $\mathrm{sym}(\mathrm{?}{\Phi }^{?}\mathrm{?}\Psi )=0$ for some $\Psi \in {\mathsf{W}}^{1,\infty }(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)\cap {\mathsf{H}}^2(\Omega ;{\mathbb{R}}^3)$ with $\det \mathrm{?}\Psi ?c^{+}>0$. Then there exists a constant translation vector $a\in {\mathbb{R}}^3$ and a constant skew-symmetric matrix $A\in \mathfrak{so}(3)$, such that $\Phi =A\Psi +a$.     

Higher genus Kashiwara–Vergne problems and the Goldman–Turaev Lie bialgebra

We define a family ${\mathrm{KV}}^{(g,n+1)}$ of Kashiwara–Vergne problems associated with compact connected oriented 2-manifolds of genus g with $n+1$ boundary components. The problem ${\mathrm{KV}}^{(0,3)}$ is the classical Kashiwara–Vergne problem from Lie theory. We show the existence of solutions to ${\mathrm{KV}}^{(g,n+1)}$ for arbitrary g and n. The key point is the solution to ${\mathrm{KV}}^{(1,1)}$ based on the results by B. Enriquez on elliptic associators. Our construction is motivated by applications to the formality problem for the Goldman–Turaev Lie bialgebra ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(g,n+1)}$. In more detail, we show that every solution to ${\mathrm{KV}}^{(g,n+1)}$ induces a Lie bialgebra isomorphism between ${\mathfrak{g}}^{(g,n+1)}$ and its associated graded $\mathrm{gr}{\mathfrak{g}}^{(g,n+1)}$. For $g=0$, a similar result was obtained by G. Massuyeau using the Kontsevich integral. For $g\ge 1$, $n=0$, our results imply that the obstruction to surjectivity of the Johnson homomorphism provided by the Turaev cobracket is equivalent to the Enomoto–Satoh obstruction.     

The mod 2 cohomology of the mapping class group of the Klein bottle with marked points

The purpose of this article is to compute the mod 2 cohomology of ${\mathrm{\Gamma }}^q(\mathbb{K})$, the mapping class group of the Klein bottle with q marked points. We provide a concrete construction of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces $X_q=K({\mathrm{\Gamma }}^q(\mathbb{K}),1)$ and fiber bundles $F_q(\mathbb{K})/{\mathrm{\Sigma }}_q\to X_q\to B({\mathbb{Z}}_2\times O(2))$, where $F_q(\mathbb{K})/{\mathrm{\Sigma }}_q$ denotes the configuration space of unordered q-tuples of distinct points in $\mathbb{K}$ and $B({\mathbb{Z}}_2\times O(2))$ is the classifying space of the group ${\mathbb{Z}}_2\times O(2)$. Moreover, we show the mod 2 Serre spectral sequence of the bundle above collapses.     

A sharp Balian–Low uncertainty principle for shift-invariant spaces

A sharp version of the Balian–Low theorem is proven for the generators of finitely generated shift-invariant spaces. If generators ${\{f_k\}}_{k=1}^K?L^2({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ are translated along a lattice to form a frame or Riesz basis for a shift-invariant space V, and if V has extra invariance by a suitable finer lattice, then one of the generators $f_k$ must satisfy ${\int }_{{\mathbb{R}}^d}|x||f_k(x){|}^{2}dx=\infty$, namely, $\stackrel{?}{f_k}?H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Similar results are proven for frames of translates that are not Riesz bases without the assumption of extra lattice invariance. The best previously existing results in the literature give a notably weaker conclusion using the Sobolev space $H^{d/2+?}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$; our results provide an absolutely sharp improvement with $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Our results are sharp in the sense that $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ cannot be replaced by $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ for any $s<1/2$.     

Expression of Dirichlet boundary conditions in terms of the strain tensor in linearized elasticity

In a previous work, it was shown how the linearized strain tensor field $\mathbf{e}:=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{?}{\mathit{u}}^T+\mathbf{?}\mathit{u})\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$ can be considered as the sole unknown in the Neumann problem of linearized elasticity posed over a domain $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^3$, instead of the displacement vector field $\mathit{u}\in {\mathit{H}}^1(\Omega )$ in the usual approach. The purpose of this Note is to show that the same approach applies as well to the Dirichlet–Neumann problem. To this end, we show how the boundary condition $\mathit{u}=\mathbf{0}$ on a portion ${\Gamma }_0$ of the boundary of Ω can be recast, again as boundary conditions on ${\Gamma }_0$, but this time expressed only in terms of the new unknown $\mathbf{e}\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$.     

A continuum of periodic solutions to the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses

In this paper, we apply the variational method with Structural Prescribed Boundary Conditions (SPBC) to prove the existence of periodic and quasi-periodic solutions for the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses $m_1=m_3$ and $m_2=m_4$. A path $q(t)$ on $[0,T]$ satisfies the SPBC if the boundaries $q(0)\in \mathbf{A}$ and $q(T)\in \mathbf{B}$, where A and B are two structural configuration spaces in ${({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4$ and they depend on a rotation angle $\theta \in (0,2\pi )$ and the mass ratio $\mu =\frac{m_2}{m_1}\in {\mathbf{R}}^{+}$.We show that there is a region $\mathrm{\Omega }?(0,2\pi )\times R^{+}$ such that there exists at least one local minimizer of the Lagrangian action functional on the path space satisfying the SPBC $\{q(t)\in H^1([0,T],{({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4)|q(0)\in \mathbf{A},q(T)\in \mathbf{B}\}$ for any $(\theta ,\mu )\in \mathrm{\Omega }$. The corresponding minimizing path of the minimizer can be extended to a non-homographic periodic solution if θ is commensurable with π or a quasi-periodic solution if θ is not commensurable with π. In the variational method with the SPBC, we only impose constraints on the boundary and we do not impose any symmetry constraint on solutions. Instead, we prove that our solutions that are extended from the initial minimizing paths possess certain symmetries.The periodic solutions can be further classified as simple choreographic solutions, double choreographic solutions and non-choreographic solutions. Among the many stable simple choreographic orbits, the most extraordinary one is the stable star pentagon choreographic solution when $(\theta ,\mu )=(\frac{4\pi }{5},1)$. Remarkably the unequal-mass variants of the stable star pentagon are just as stable as the equal mass choreographies.