On the ring of local polynomial invariants for a pair of entangled qubits

The entanglement characteristics of two qubits are encoded in the invariants of the adjoint action of the group SU(2) ⊗ SU(2) on the space of density matrices \mathfrakP₊ {\mathfrak{P}_{+} } , defined as the space of 4 × 4 positive semidefinite Hermitian matrices. The corresponding ring \textC[ \mathfrakP₊ ]^{\textSU( 2 ) ?\textSU ?( 2 )} {\text{C}}{\left[ {{\mathfrak{P}_{+} }} \right]^{{\text{SU}}\left( {2} \right) \otimes {\text{SU}} \otimes \left( {2} \right)}} of polynomial invariants is studied. A special integrity basis for \textC[ \mathfrakP₊ ]^{\textSU( 2 ) ?\textSU ?( 2 )} {\text{C}}{\left[ {{\mathfrak{P}_{+} }} \right]^{{\text{SU}}\left( {2} \right) \otimes {\text{SU}} \otimes \left( {2} \right)}} is described, and the constraints on its elements imposed by the positive semidefiniteness of density matrices are given explicitly in the form of polynomial inequalities. The suggested basis is characterized by the property that the minimum number of invariants, namely, two primary invariants of degree 2, 3 and one secondary invariant of degree 4 appearing in the Hironaka decomposition of \textC[ \mathfrakP₊ ]^{\textSU( 2 ) ?\textSU ?( 2 )} {\text{C}}{\left[ {{\mathfrak{P}_{+} }} \right]^{{\text{SU}}\left( {2} \right) \otimes {\text{SU}} \otimes \left( {2} \right)}} , are subject to the polynomial inequalities. Bibliography: 32 titles.     

Enveloping algebras of Slodowy slices and Goldie rank

Let U( \mathfrakg,e ) U\left( {\mathfrak{g},e} \right) be the finite W-algebra associated with a nilpotent element e in a complex simple Lie algebra \mathfrakg = \textLie(G) \mathfrak{g} = {\text{Lie}}(G) and let I be a primitive ideal of the enveloping algebra U( \mathfrakg ) U\left( \mathfrak{g} \right) whose associated variety equals the Zariski closure of the nilpotent orbit (Ad G) e. Then it is known that I = \textAn\textn_{U( \mathfrakg )}( Q_e ?_{U( \mathfrakg,e )}V ) I = {\text{An}}{{\text{n}}_{U\left( \mathfrak{g} \right)}}\left( {{Q_e}{ \otimes_{U\left( {\mathfrak{g},e} \right)}}V} \right) for some finite dimensional irreducible U( \mathfrakg,e ) U\left( {\mathfrak{g},e} \right) -module V, where Q _e stands for the generalised Gelfand–Graev \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} -module associated with e. The main goal of this paper is to prove that the Goldie rank of the primitive quotient U( \mathfrakg )

On quasiorder lattices and topology lattices of algebras

In this paper, it is shown that the dual [(\textQord)\tilde]\mathfrakA \widetilde{\text{Qord}}\mathfrak{A} of the quasiorder lattice of any algebra \mathfrakA \mathfrak{A} is isomorphic to a sublattice of the topology lattice á( \mathfrakA ) \Im \left( \mathfrak{A} \right) . Further, if \mathfrakA \mathfrak{A} is a finite algebra, then [(\textQord)\tilde]\mathfrakA @ á( \mathfrakA ) \widetilde{\text{Qord}}\mathfrak{A} \cong \Im \left( \mathfrak{A} \right) . We give a sufficient condition for the lattices [(\textCon)\tilde]\mathfrakA\text, [(\textQord)\tilde]\mathfrakA \widetilde{\text{Con}}\mathfrak{A}{\text{,}} \widetilde{\text{Qord}}\mathfrak{A} , and á( \mathfrakA ) \Im \left( \mathfrak{A} \right) . to be pairwise isomorphic. These results are applied to investigate topology lattices and quasiorder lattices of unary algebras.     

Modular Lie algebras and the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture

Let ${\mathfrak{g}}Let \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} be a finite dimensional simple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field \mathbbK\mathbb{K} of characteristic 0. Let \mathfrakg_\mathbbZ{\mathfrak{g}}_{{\mathbb{Z}}} be a Chevalley ℤ-form of \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} and \mathfrakg_\Bbbk=\mathfrakg_\mathbbZ?_\mathbbZ\Bbbk{\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}={\mathfrak{g}}_{{\mathbb{Z}}}\otimes _{{\mathbb{Z}}}\Bbbk, where \Bbbk\Bbbk is the algebraic closure of  \mathbbF_p{\mathbb{F}}_{p}. Let G_\BbbkG_{\Bbbk} be a simple, simply connected algebraic \Bbbk\Bbbk-group with \operatornameLie(G_\Bbbk)=\mathfrakg_\Bbbk\operatorname{Lie}(G_{\Bbbk})={\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}. In this paper, we apply recent results of Rudolf Tange on the fraction field of the centre of the universal enveloping algebra U(\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)U({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}) to show that if the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture (from 1966) holds for \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}}, then for all p≫0 the field of rational functions \Bbbk (\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)\Bbbk ({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk}) is purely transcendental over its subfield \Bbbk(\mathfrakg_\Bbbk)^G_\Bbbk\Bbbk({\mathfrak{g}}_{\Bbbk})^{G_{\Bbbk}}. Very recently, it was proved by Colliot-Thélène, Kunyavskiĭ, Popov, and Reichstein that the field of rational functions \mathbbK(\mathfrakg){\mathbb{K}}({\mathfrak{g}}) is not purely transcendental over its subfield \mathbbK(\mathfrakg)^\mathfrakg{\mathbb{K}}({\mathfrak{g}})^{\mathfrak{g}} if \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is of type B _n , n≥3, D _n , n≥4, E₆, E₇, E₈ or F₄. We prove a modular version of this result (valid for p≫0) and use it to show that, in characteristic 0, the Gelfand–Kirillov conjecture fails for the simple Lie algebras of the above types. In other words, if \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is of type B _n , n≥3, D _n , n≥4, E₆, E₇, E₈ or F₄, then the Lie field of \mathfrakg{\mathfrak{g}} is more complicated than expected.     

On divisible weighted Dynkin diagrams and reachable elements

Let e be a nilpotent element of a complex simple Lie algebra $ \mathfrak{g} Let e be a nilpotent element of a complex simple Lie algebra \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} . The weighted Dynkin diagram of e, D(e) \mathcal{D}(e) , is said to be divisible if D(e)

An $ \mathfrak{X} $-crown of a finite soluble group

Let G be a finite soluble group and F_\mathfrakX(G) {\Phi_\mathfrak{X}}(G) an intersection of all those maximal subgroups M of G for which G

On one class of extreme extensions of a measure

We consider a relationship between two sets of extensions of a finite finitely additive measure μ defined on an algebra \mathfrakB \mathfrak{B} of sets to a broader algebra \mathfrakA \mathfrak{A} . These sets are the set ex S _μ of all extreme extensions of the measure μ and the set H _μ of all extensions defined as l(A) = [^(m)]( h(A) ),   A ? \mathfrakA \lambda (A) = \hat{\mu }\left( {h(A)} \right),\,\,\,A \in \mathfrak{A} , where [^(m)] \hat{\mu } is a quotient measure on the algebra \mathfrakB

An inverse spectral theorem for Kre?n strings with a negative eigenvalue

A string is a pair (L, \mathfrakm){(L, \mathfrak{m})} where L ? [0, ￥]{L \in[0, \infty]} and \mathfrakm{\mathfrak{m}} is a positive, possibly unbounded, Borel measure supported on [0, L]; we think of L as the length of the string and of \mathfrakm{\mathfrak{m}} as its mass density. To each string a differential operator acting in the space L²(\mathfrakm){L^2(\mathfrak{m})} is associated. Namely, the Kreĭn–Feller differential operator -D_\mathfrakmD_x{-D_{\mathfrak{m}}D_x} ; its eigenvalue equation can be written, e.g., as

Cohomology of solvable lie algebras and solvmanifolds

The cohomology H _{\mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} ) of the tangent Lie algebra \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} of the group G with coefficients in the one-dimensional representation \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} \mathbbK\mathbb{K} defined by [(W)\tilde] \mathfrakg \tilde \Omega _\mathfrak{g} of H ¹(G/ \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} .}     

Slices for biparabolics of index 1

Let \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} be an algebraic Lie subalgebra of a simple Lie algebra \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} with index \mathfraka \mathfrak{a}  ≤ rank \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} . Let Y( \mathfraka ) Y\left( \mathfrak{a} \right) denote the algebra of \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} invariant polynomial functions on \mathfraka^* {\mathfrak{a}^*} . An algebraic slice for \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} is an affine subspace η + V with h ? \mathfraka^* \eta \in {\mathfrak{a}^*} and V ì \mathfraka^* V \subset {\mathfrak{a}^*} subspace of dimension index \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} such that restriction of function induces an isomorphism of Y( \mathfraka ) Y\left( \mathfrak{a} \right) onto the algebra R[η + V] of regular functions on η + V. Slices have been obtained in a number of cases through the construction of an adapted pair (h, η) in which h ? \mathfraka h \in \mathfrak{a} is ad-semisimple, η is a regular element of \mathfraka^* {\mathfrak{a}^*} which is an eigenvector for h of eigenvalue minus one and V is an h stable complement to ( \textad  \mathfraka )h \left( {{\text{ad}}\;\mathfrak{a}} \right)\eta in \mathfraka^* {\mathfrak{a}^*} . The classical case is for \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} semisimple [16], [17]. Yet rather recently many other cases have been provided; for example, if \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} is of type A and \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} is a “truncated biparabolic” [12] or a centralizer [13]. In some of these cases (in particular when the biparabolic is a Borel subalgebra) it was found [13], [14], that η could be taken to be the restriction of a regular nilpotent element in \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} . Moreover, this calculation suggested [13] how to construct slices outside type A when no adapted pair exists. This article makes a first step in taking these ideas further. Specifically, let \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} be a truncated biparabolic of index one. (This only arises if \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} is of type A and \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} is the derived algebra of a parabolic subalgebra whose Levi factor has just two blocks whose sizes are coprime.) In this case it is shown that the second member of an adapted pair (h, η) for \mathfraka \mathfrak{a} is the restriction of a particularly carefully chosen regular nilpotent element of \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} . A by-product of our analysis is the construction of a map from the set of pairs of coprime integers to the set of all finite ordered sequences of ±1.     

Two-step solvable Lie algebras and weight graphs

By using the concept of weight graph associated to nonsplit complex nilpotent Lie algebras \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g}, we find necessary and sufficient conditions for a semidirect product \mathfrakg?^? T_i\mathfrak{g}\overrightarrow{\oplus } T_{i} to be two-step solvable, where $T_{i}TT over \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} which induces a decomposition of \mathfrakg\mathfrak{g} into one-dimensional weight spaces without zero weights. In particular we show that the semidirect product of such a Lie algebra with a maximal torus of derivations cannot be itself two-step solvable. We also obtain some applications to rigid Lie algebras, as a geometrical proof of the nonexistence of two-step nonsplit solvable rigid Lie algebras in dimensions n\geqslant 3n\geqslant 3.     

Exterior powers of the reflection representation in Springer theory

Let H^*( B_e ) {H^*}\left( {{\mathcal{B}_e}} \right) be the total Springer representation of W for the nilpotent element e in a simple Lie algebra \mathfrakg \mathfrak{g} . Let Λ ⁱ V denote the ith exterior power of the reflection representation V of W. The focus of this paper is on the algebra of W-invariants in

Automorphisms of a finitary factor power of an infinite symmetric group

We consider a semigroup FP_\textfin⁺ ( \mathfrakS_\textfin( \mathbbN ) ) FP_{\text{fin}}^{+} \left( {{\mathfrak{S}_{\text{fin}}}\left( \mathbb{N} \right)} \right) defined as a finitary factor power of a finitary symmetric group of countable order. It is proved that all automorphisms of FP_\textfin⁺ ( \mathfrakS_\textfin( \mathbbN ) ) FP_{\text{fin}}^{+} \left( {{\mathfrak{S}_{\text{fin}}}\left( \mathbb{N} \right)} \right) are induced by permutations from \mathfrakS( \mathbbN ) \mathfrak{S}\left( \mathbb{N} \right) .     

Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω

We investigate splitting number and reaping number for the structure (ω) ^ω of infinite partitions of ω. We prove that \mathfrakr_d ￡ non(M),non(N),\mathfrakd{\mathfrak{r}_{d}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N}),\mathfrak{d}} and \mathfraks_d 3 \mathfrakb{\mathfrak{s}_{d}\geq\mathfrak{b}} . We also show the consistency results ${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})}${\mathfrak{r}_{d} > \mathfrak{b}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{d}, \mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathfrak{r}, \mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})} and ${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})}${\mathfrak{s}_{d} > \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})} . To prove the consistency \mathfrakr_d < add(M){\mathfrak{r}_{d} < \mathsf{add}(\mathcal{M})} and \mathfraks_d < cof(M){\mathfrak{s}_{d} < \mathsf{cof}(\mathcal{M})} we introduce new cardinal invariants \mathfrakr_pair{\mathfrak{r}_{pair}} and \mathfraks_pair{\mathfrak{s}_{pair}} . We also study the relation between \mathfrakr_pair, \mathfraks_pair{\mathfrak{r}_{pair}, \mathfrak{s}_{pair}} and other cardinal invariants. We show that cov(M),cov(N) ￡ \mathfrakr_pair ￡ \mathfraks_d,\mathfrakr{\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{cov}(\mathcal{N})\leq\mathfrak{r}_{pair}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{d},\mathfrak{r}} and \mathfraks ￡ \mathfraks_pair ￡ non(M),non(N){\mathfrak{s}\leq\mathfrak{s}_{pair}\leq\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{M}),\mathsf{non}(\mathcal{N})} .     

Quantization of Lie bialgebras and shuffle algebras of Lie algebras

To any field \Bbb K \Bbb K of characteristic zero, we associate a set (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) and a group G₀(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) . Elements of (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) are equivalence classes of families of Lie polynomials subject to associativity relations. Elements of G₀(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) are universal automorphisms of the adjoint representations of Lie bialgebras over \Bbb K \Bbb K . We construct a bijection between (\mathbbK)×G₀(\Bbb K) (\mathbb{K})\times{\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) and the set of quantization functors of Lie bialgebras over \Bbb K \Bbb K . This construction involves the following steps.? 1) To each element v \varpi of (\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) , we associate a functor \frak a?\operatornameSh^v(\frak a) \frak a\mapsto\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) from the category of Lie algebras to that of Hopf algebras; \operatornameSh^v(\frak a) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) contains U\frak a U\frak a .? 2) When \frak a \frak a and \frak b \frak b are Lie algebras, and r_{\frak a\frak b} ? \frak a?\frak b r_{\frak a\frak b} \in\frak a\otimes\frak b , we construct an element ?^v (r_{\frak a\frak b}) {\cal R}^{\varpi} (r_{\frak a\frak b}) of \operatornameSh^v(\frak a)?\operatornameSh^v(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)\otimes\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) satisfying quasitriangularity identities; in particular, ?^v(r_{\frak a\frak b}) {\cal R}^\varpi(r_{\frak a\frak b}) defines a Hopf algebra morphism from \operatornameSh^v(\frak a)^* \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)^* to \operatornameSh^v(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) .? 3) When \frak a = \frak b \frak a = \frak b and r_\frak a ? \frak a?\frak a r_\frak a\in\frak a\otimes\frak a is a solution of CYBE, we construct a series r^v(r_\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) such that ?^v(r^v(r_\frak a)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r_\frak a)) is a solution of QYBE. The expression of r^v(r_\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) in terms of r_\frak a r_\frak a involves Lie polynomials, and we show that this expression is unique at a universal level. This step relies on vanishing statements for cohomologies arising from universal algebras for the solutions of CYBE.? 4) We define the quantization of a Lie bialgebra \frak g \frak g as the image of the morphism defined by ?^v(r^v(r)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r)) , where r ? \mathfrakg ?\mathfrakg^* r \in \mathfrak{g} \otimes \mathfrak{g}^* .<\P>     

Schur–Weyl duality over finite fields

We prove a version of the Schur–Weyl duality over finite fields. We prove that for any field k, if k has at least r + 1 elements, the Schur–Weyl duality holds for the rth tensor power of a finite dimensional vector space V. Moreover, if the dimension of V is at least r + 1, the natural map ${{k\mathfrak{S}_r \to \mathsf{End}_{{\rm GL}(V)}(V^{\otimes r})}}We prove a version of the Schur–Weyl duality over finite fields. We prove that for any field k, if k has at least r + 1 elements, the Schur–Weyl duality holds for the rth tensor power of a finite dimensional vector space V. Moreover, if the dimension of V is at least r + 1, the natural map k\mathfrakS_r ? End_GL(V)(V^?r){{k\mathfrak{S}_r \to \mathsf{End}_{{\rm GL}(V)}(V^{\otimes r})}} is an isomorphism. This isomorphism may fail if dim _k V is not strictly larger than r.     

Absolutely convergent fourier series. An improvement of the Beurling-Helson theorem

We consider the space A(\mathbbT)A(\mathbb{T}) of all continuous functions f on the circle \mathbbT\mathbb{T} such that the sequence of Fourier coefficients [^(f)] = { [^(f)]( k ), k ? \mathbbZ }\hat f = \left\{ {\hat f\left( k \right), k \in \mathbb{Z}} \right\} belongs to l ¹(ℤ). The norm on A(\mathbbT)A(\mathbb{T}) is defined by || f ||_A(\mathbbT) = || [^(f)] ||_{l¹ (\mathbbZ)}\left\| f \right\|_{A(\mathbb{T})} = \left\| {\hat f} \right\|_{l^1 (\mathbb{Z})}. According to the well-known Beurling-Helson theorem, if f:\mathbbT ? \mathbbT\phi :\mathbb{T} \to \mathbb{T} is a continuous mapping such that || e^inf ||_A(\mathbbT) = O(1)\left\| {e^{in\phi } } \right\|_{A(\mathbb{T})} = O(1), n ∈ ℤ then φ is linear. It was conjectured by Kahane that the same conclusion about φ is true under the assumption that || e^inf ||_A(\mathbbT) = o( log| n | )\left\| {e^{in\phi } } \right\|_{A(\mathbb{T})} = o\left( {\log \left| n \right|} \right). We show that if $\left\| {e^{in\phi } } \right\|_{A(\mathbb{T})} = o\left( {\left( {{{\log \log \left| n \right|} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\log \log \left| n \right|} {\log \log \log \left| n \right|}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\log \log \log \left| n \right|}}} \right)^{1/12} } \right)$\left\| {e^{in\phi } } \right\|_{A(\mathbb{T})} = o\left( {\left( {{{\log \log \left| n \right|} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\log \log \left| n \right|} {\log \log \log \left| n \right|}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\log \log \log \left| n \right|}}} \right)^{1/12} } \right), then φ is linear.     

Über die Bedingung Going up für {R \subset \hat{R}}

Let (R,\mathfrak m){(R,\mathfrak m)} be a noetherian, local ring with completion [^(R)]{\hat{R}} . We show that R ì [^(R)]{R \subset \hat{R}} satisfies the condition Going up if and only if there exists to every artinian R-module M with Ann_R(M) ì \mathfrakp{{\rm Ann}_R(M) \subset \mathfrak{p}} a submodule U ì M{U \subset M} with Ann_R(U)=\mathfrakp.{{\rm {Ann}}_R(U)=\mathfrak{p}.} This is further equivalent to R being formal catenary, to α(R) = 0 and to H^d_{\mathfrakq/\mathfrakp}(R/\mathfrakp)=0{H^d_{\mathfrak{q}/\mathfrak{p}}(R/\mathfrak{p})=0} for all prime ideals \mathfrakp ì \mathfrakq \subsetneq \mathfrakm{\mathfrak{p} \subset \mathfrak{q} \subsetneq \mathfrak{m}} where d = dim(R/\mathfrakp){d = {\rm {dim}}(R/\mathfrak{p})}.     

A rigidity result for highest order local cohomology modules

Let M be a finitely generated faithful module over a noetherian ring R of dimension d < ￥ \infty and let \mathfrak a \subseteqq R {\mathfrak a} \subseteqq R be an ideal. We describe the (finite) set Supp_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) = Ass_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) \textrm{Supp}_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) = \textrm{Ass}_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) of primes associated to the highest local cohomology module H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M) H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M) in terms of the local formal behaviour of \mathfrak a {\mathfrak a} . If R is integral and of finite type over a field, Supp_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) \textrm{Supp}_R(H_{\mathfrak a}^d (M)) is the set of those closed points of X = Spec(R) whose fibre under the normalization morphism n: X￠? X \nu : X' \rightarrow X contains points which are isolated in n^-1(Spec(R/\mathfrak a)) \nu^{-1}(\textrm{Spec}(R/{\mathfrak a})) .