Asymptotic evaluation of two families of integrals

In this paper the integrals $\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{mv}}\text{(τ) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{exp}\text{[?(t + τ)]t}{}^{\mathrm{v}}\text{(}\text{ln}\text{t)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{(t + τ)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{dt}\text{and}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{mv}}\text{(τ) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{exp}\text{[? ¦ ? τ ¦]t}{}^{\mathrm{v}}\text{(}\text{ln}\text{t)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{(t ? τ)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{dt}$ are investigated for positive real values of the variable τ. Here, m is a nonnegative integer, v is a complex variable with Re(v) > ?1. Both integrals are related to the complex integral Φ_mγ(z) = ∝₀^∞exp[?(t ? z)]t^?γ(ln t)^m(t ? z)^?1dt with 0 ? Re(γ) < 1, the behavior of which is analyzed in detail. The results are applied to obtain asymptotic representations for f_mn(τ) and g_mn(τ), m and n both nonnegative integers, near τ = 0. The latter integrals play a role in the study of the equations of neutron transport and radiative transfer.     

Two transformations of series that commute with compositional inversion

It is shown that the compositional inverse of either of two transformations of a given series can be determined from the compositional inverse of the series. Specifically, if t · f(t) and t · g(t) are compositional inverses, then so are t · f_k(t) and $\text{t · g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^1\text{(t)}$, where f_k(t) is the kth Euler transformation of f(t) and $\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^1\text{(t) =}\text{g(t)}\text{(1 ? kt · g(t))}$.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

A comparison of different compactness notions in fuzzy topological spaces

Starting from a defining differential equation $\text{(}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{) W(λ, t, u) = (}\text{λ(u ? t)}\text{p(t)}\text{) W(λ, t, u)}$ of the kernel of an exponential operator $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{W(λ, t, u)?(u) du}$ with normalization ∫_?∞^∞W(λ, t, u) du = 1, we determine S_λ for various p(t) including; for example, p(t) a quadratic polynomial, all the known exponential operators are recovered and some new ones are constructed. It is shown that all the exponential operators are approximation operators. Further approximation properties of these operators are discussed. For example, functions satisfying $\text{∥ S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) ? ?(t)∥ = O(λ}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha }}\text{)}$ are characterized. Several results of C. P. May are also improved.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

A combinatorial interpretation for two transformations of series that commute with compositional inversion

For a formal power series $\text{g(t) =}\text{1}\text{[1 + ∑}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$ with nonnegative integer coefficients, the compositional inverse $\text{f}\text{(t) = t · f(t)}$ of $\text{g}\text{(t) = t · g(t)}$ is shown to be the generating function for the colored planted plane trees in which each vertex of degree i + 1 is colored one of h_i colors. Since the compositional inverse of the Euler transformation of f(t) is the star transformation [[g(t)]^?1 ? 1]^?1 of g(t), [2], it follows that the Euler transformation of f(t) is the generating function for the colored planted plane trees in which each internal vertex of degree i + 1 is colored one of h_i colors for i > 1, and h₁ ? 1 colors for i = 1.     

An abstract nonlinear Volterra integrodifferential equation

We study the nonlinear Volterra equation $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? F(t) (0 < t < ∞) (′ =}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{), u(0) = u}{}_0$, (¹) as well as the corresponding problem with infinite delay $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? ?(t) (0 < t < ∞), u(t) = h(t) (?∞ < t ? 0)}$. (⁷) Under various assumptions on the nonlinear operators A, B and on the given functions a, F, f, h existence theorems are obtained for (¹) and (⁷, followed by results concerning boundedness and asymptotic behaviour of solutions on (0 ? < ∞); two applications of the theory to problems of nonlinear heat flow with “infinite memory” are also discussed.     

Asymptotic behavior of nonoscillatory solutions of nonlinear differential equations with retarded arguments

For nonlinear retarded differential equations $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{2n}}\text{(t)?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t,y(t),y(g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)))=0}$ and $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{m}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)F}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y(g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)))=h(t),}$ the sufficient conditions are given on f_i, p_i, F_i, and h under which every bounded nonoscillatory solution of (${}^1$) or (${}^7$) tends to zero as t → ∞.     

Analyticity of solutions of nonlinear evolution equations

Analyticity in t of solutions u(t) of nonlinear evolution equations of the form $\text{u′ + A(t, u)u = ?(t, u), t > 0, u(0) = u}{}_0$, is established under suitable conditions on $\text{A(t, u), ?(t, u),}\text{and}\text{u}{}_0$. An application is given to quasilinear parabolic equations.     

The one-dimensional diffusion process and unitary representations of R1

Given a cocycle a(t) of a unitary group {U¹}, ?∞ < t < ∞, on a Hilbert space $\text{H}$, such that a(t) is of bounded variation on [O, T] for every T > O, a(t) is decomposed as a(t) = f;^t₀U^sxds + β(t) for a unique x ? $\text{H}$, β(t) yielding a vector measure singular with respect to Lebesgue measure. The variance is defined as $\text{σ}{}^2\text{({rmU}{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{}, a(t)) =}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{T\to \infty }}\text{(}\text{1}\text{T}\text{)∥∝}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_0\text{U}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{x ds∥}{}^2$ if existing. For a stationary diffusion process on $\text{R}$¹, with Ω₁, the space of paths which are natural extensions backwards in time, of paths confined to one nonsingular interval J of positive recurrent type, an information function I(ω) is defined on $\text{Ω}{}_1$, based on the paths restricted to the time interval [0, 1]. It is shown that $\text{I(Ω)}$ is continuous and bounded on $\text{Ω}{}_1$. The shift τ_t, defines a unitary representation {U^t}. Assuming , dm being the stationary measure defined by the transition probabilities and the invariant measure on J, $\text{I(Ω)}$ has a C^∞ spectral density function f;. It is then shown that σ²({U^t}, I) = f;(O).     

On maximum principles for a class of nonlinear second-order elliptic equations

In a recent paper [3] the authors derived maximum principles which involved $\text{u(x)}\text{and}\text{q = ¦}\text{grad}\text{u¦}$, where u(x) is a classical solution of an alliptic differential equation of the form ($\text{g(q}{}^2\text{)u}{}_{\mathrm{,i}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{,i}}\text{+ ?(u) ?(q}{}^2\text{) = 0}$. In this paper these results are extended to the more general case in which $\text{g = g(u, q}{}^2\text{)}\text{and}\text{?(u) ?(q}{}^2\text{)}$ is replaced by h(u, q²).     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators

The operator $\text{L?(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ acting on H=∝₀^2π⊕L²(v_t), where m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π are measures on [0, 2π] with m smooth and e(s, t) = exp[?∝_t^s∝_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ)], satisfies $\text{rank}\text{(I ? LL}{}^1\text{) =}\text{rank}\text{(I ? L}{}^1\text{L) = 1}$. It is, therefore, unitarily equivalent to a scalar Sz.-Nagy-Foia? canonical model. The purpose of this paper is to determine the model explicitly and to give a formula for the unitary equivalence.     

Oscillation theorems for second-order functional differential equations

This paper presents some comparison theorems on the oscillatory behavior of solutions of second-order functional differential equations. Here we state one of the main results in a simplified form: Let q, τ₁, τ₂ be nonnegative continuous functions on (0, ∞) such that τ₁ ? τ₂ is a bounded function on [1, ∞) and t ? τ₁(t) → ∞ if t → ∞. Then $\text{y}\text{?}\text{(t) + q(t) y(t ? τ}{}_1\text{(t)) = 0}$ is oscillatory if and only if $\text{y}\text{?}\text{(t) + q(t) y(t ? τ}{}_2\text{(t)) = 0}$ is oscillatory.     

Coding theory in white Gaussian channel with feedback

The message m = {m(t)} is a Gaussian process that is to be transmitted through the white Gaussian channel with feedback: $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{F(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)ds + W(t)}$. Under the average power constraint, $\text{E[F}{}^2\text{(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)] ≤ P}{}_0$, we construct causally the optimal coding, in the sense that the mutual information I_t(m, Y) between the message m and the channel output Y (up to t) is maximized. The optimal coding is presented by $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{A(s)[m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)] ds + W(t)}$, where $\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s) = E[m(s) ¦ Y(u), 0 ≤ u ≤ s]}$ and A(s) is a positive function such that $\text{A}{}^2\text{(s) E |m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)|}{}^2\text{= P}{}_0$.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

A remark on the tail probability of a distribution

Let {X_n}_n≥1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. For each integer n ≥ 1 and positive constants r, t, and ?, let S_n = Σ_j=1ⁿX_j and $\text{E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(r, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{r?2}}\text{P{|S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>r</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{}}$. In this paper, we prove that (1) lim_?→0+?^α(r?1)E{N_∞(r, t, ?)} = K(r, t) if E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) = 1, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞, where 2 ≤ t < 2r ≤ 2t, $\text{K(r, t) =}\text{{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha (r?1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{Γ(}\text{(1 + α(r ? 1))}\text{2}\text{)}}\text{{(r ? 1) Γ(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}}$, and $\text{α =}\text{2t}\text{(2r ? t)}$; (2) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{?\to 0+}}\text{G(t, ?)}\text{H(t, ?)}\text{= 0}$ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(|X₁|^t) < ∞, where G(t, ?) = E{N_∞(t, t, ?)} = Σ_n=1^∞n^t?2P{| S_n | > ?n} → ∞ as ? → 0+ and $\text{H(t, ?) = E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(t, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{t?2}}\text{P{| S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{} → ∞}\text{as}\text{? → 0+}$, i.e., H(t, ?) goes to infinity much faster than G(t, ?) as ? → 0+ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞. Our results provide us with a much better and deeper understanding of the tail probability of a distribution.     

Temporally inhomogeneous scattering theory

A theory of scattering for the time dependent evolution equations $\text{du}\text{dt}\text{= iH}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)u, j = 0, 1}$ (¹) is developed. The wave operators are defined in terms of the evolution operators U_j(t, s), which govern (¹). The scattering operator remains unitary. Sufficient conditions for existence and completeness of the wave operators are obtained; these are the main results. General properties, such as the chain rule and various intertwining relations, are also established. Applications include potential scattering (H₀(t) = ?Δ, Δ denoting the Laplacian, and H₁(t) = ?Δ + q(t, ·)) and scattering for second-order differential operators with coefficients constant in the spatial variable ($\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t) = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{m,\; k\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{mk}}{}^{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{(t)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + b}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{(t)}\text{for}\text{j = 0, 1}$).     

A Feynman-Kac gauge for solvability of the Schrödinger equation

Let {X_t, t ≥ 0} be Brownian motion in $\text{R}$^d (d ≥ 1). Let D be a bounded domain in $\text{R}$^d with C² boundary, ?D, and let q be a continuous (if d = 1), Hölder continuous (if d ≥ 2) function in D?. If the Feynman-Kac “gauge” E_x{exp(∝₀^τ_Dq(X_t)dt)1_A(X_τD)}, where τ_D is the first exit time from D, is finite for some non-empty open set A on ?D and some x?D, then for any $\text{? ? C}{}^0\text{(?D}$), is the unique solution in $\text{C}{}^2\text{(D) ∩ C}{}^0\text{(}\text{D}\text{?}\text{)}$ of the Schrödinger boundary value problem $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{Δ}\text{+ q)φ = 0}\text{in}\text{D, φ = ?}\text{on}\text{?D}$.