Entrapment of a Pseudo‐Tetrahedral CoII Center by Thioether Sulfur Bound {Co2(μ‐L)} Fragments: Synthesis,Field‐Induced Single‐Ion Magnetism and Catechol Oxidase Mimicking Activity

Simultaneous incorporation of both Co^II and Co^III ions within a new thioether S‐bearing phenol‐based ligand system, H₃L (2,6‐bis‐[{2‐(2‐hydroxyethylthio)ethylimino}methyl]‐4‐methylphenol) formed [Co₅] aggregates [Co^IICo^III₄L₂(μ‐OH)₂(μ_1,3‐O₂CCH₃)₂](ClO₄)₄?H₂O ( 1 ) and [Co^IICo^III₄L₂(μ‐OH)₂(μ_1,3‐O₂CC₂H₅)₂](ClO₄)₄?H₂O ( 2 ). The magnetic studies revealed axial zero‐field splitting (ZFS) parameter, D/hc=?23.6 and ?24.3 cm^?1, and E/D=0.03 and 0.00, respectively for 1 and 2 . Dynamic magnetic data confirmed the complexes as SIMs with U_eff/k_B=30 K ( 1 ) and 33 K ( 2 ), and τ₀=9.1×10^?8 s ( 1 ), and 4.3×10^?8 s ( 2 ). The larger atomic radius of S compared to N gave rise to less variation in the distortion of tetrahedral geometry around central Co^II centers, thus affecting the D and U_eff/k_B values. Theoretical studies also support the experimental findings and reveal the origin of the anisotropy parameters. In solutions, both 1 and 2 which produce {Co^III₂(μ‐L)} units, display solvent‐dependent catechol oxidation behavior toward 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatechol in air. The presence of an adjacent Co^III ion tends to assist the electron transfer from the substrate to the metal ion center, enhancing the catalytic oxidation rate.     

Crystal structure and magnetic properties of a linear tetranuclear CoII cluster

Polynuclear complexes are an important class of inorganic functional materials and are of interest particularly for their applications in molecular magnets. Multidentate chelating ligands play an important role in the design and syntheses of polynuclear metal clusters. A novel linear tetranuclear Co^II cluster, namely bis{μ₃‐(E)‐2‐[(2‐oxidobenzylidene)amino]phenolato}bis{μ₂‐(E)‐2‐[(2‐oxidobenzylidene)amino]phenolato}bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)tetracobalt(II), [Co₄(C₁₄H₁₁NO₂)₄(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂], was prepared under solvothermal conditions through a mixed‐ligand synthetic strategy. The structure was determined by X‐ray single‐crystal diffraction and bulk purity was confirmed by powder X‐ray diffraction. The complex molecule has a centrosymmetric tetranuclear chain‐like structure and the four Co^II ions are located in two different coordination environments. The Co^II ions at the ends of the chain are in a slightly distorted octahedral geometry, while the two inner Co^II ions are in five‐coordinate distorted trigonal bipyramidal environments. A magnetic study reveals ferromagnetic Co^II…Co^II exchange interactions for the complex.     

Modelling the Magnetic Behaviour of Square‐Pyramidal CoII5 Aggregates: Tuning SMM Behaviour through Variations in the Ligand Shell

Three new μ₄‐bridged Co^II₅ clusters with similar core motifs have been synthesised with the use of N‐tert‐butyldiethanolamine (tbdeaH₂) and pivalic acid (piv): [Co^II₅(μ₄‐N₃)(tbdea)₂(μ‐piv)₄(piv)(CH₃CN)₂]?CH₃CN ( 1 ), [Co^II₅(μ₄‐Cl)(Cl)(tbdea)₂(μ‐piv)₄(pivH)₂] ( 2 ) and [Co^II₅(μ₄‐N₃)(Cl)(tbdea)₂(μ‐piv)₄(pivH)₂] ( 3 ). Magnetic measurements were performed for all three compounds. It was found that while the chloride‐bridged cluster 2 does not show an out‐of‐phase signal, which excludes single‐molecule magnet (SMM) behaviour, the azide‐bridged compounds 1 and 3 show out‐of‐phase signals as well as frequency dependence of the ac susceptibility, as expected for SMMs. We confirmed that 1 is a SMM with zero‐field quantum tunnelling of the magnetisation at 1.8 K. Compound 3 is likely a SMM with a blocking temperature well below 1.8 K. We established a physical model to fit the χT versus T and M versus B curves of the three compounds to reproduce the observed SMM trend. The analysis showed that small changes in the ligand shell modify not only the magnitude of exchange constants, but also affect the J and g matrices in a non‐trivial way.     

Thermal Cleavage of Cyclobutane Rings in Photodimerized Coordination‐Polymeric Sheets

Three coordination polymers, [Cd₂(pvba)₂(tbdc)(dmf)₂] ( 1 ), [Co₂(pvba)₂(tbdc)(dmf)₂(H₂O)₂] ( 2 ), and [Ni₂(pvba)₂(tbdc)(dmf)₂(H₂O)₂] ( 3 ) (H₂tbdc=2,3,5,6‐tetrabromobenzenedicarboxylic acid, Hpvba=trans‐2‐(4′‐pyridyl)vinylbenzoic acid), were synthesized by solvothermal methods. The solid‐state structures of compounds 1 and 2 were determined by X‐ray crystallography. In compounds 1 and 2 , the bimetallic cores acted as secondary building units that connected the tbdc ligands in one direction and a pair of pvba ligands, which were aligned in a head‐to‐tail parallel manner, in the orthogonal direction to form sheet structures. The C?C bonds in these pvba ligand pairs in all three compounds were well‐aligned to undergo quantitative [2+2] cycloaddition reactions in the solid state under UV irradiation, thereby yielding their cyclobutane derivatives. This photochemical reaction appeared to facilitate structural transformations from one 2D structure into another in the solid state. The photoreactive Co^II‐ and Ni^II coordination polymers exhibited a reversible dehydration–rehydration reaction that was accompanied by color changes from pink to purple and green to yellow, respectively, owing to a change in coordination number from six to five. Magnetic studies showed that compound 2 was an antiferromagnet, which displayed a field‐dependent transition with a critical field (H_c) of 40 kOe at 2 K; the antiferromagnetic interaction between the Co₂ units was strengthened and weakened by dehydration and UV irradiation, respectively. The cyclobutane ligand in the photodimerized products was cleaved on heating to yield a mixture of trans‐ and cis‐isomers of pvba, as monitored by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The Cd^II coordination polymer underwent quantitative cleavage of the cyclobutane ring whilst the other two underwent partial cleavage.     

New Mechanistic Insight into Stepwise Metal‐Center Exchange in a Metal–Organic Framework Based on Asymmetric Zn4 Clusters

Herein, a mechanism of stepwise metal‐center exchange for a specific metal–organic framework, namely, [Zn₄(dcpp)₂(DMF)₃(H₂O)₂]_n (H₄dcpp=4,5‐bis(4′‐carboxylphenyl)phthalic acid), is disclosed for the first time. The coordination stabilities between the central metal atoms and the ligands as well as the coordination geometry are considered to be dominant factors in this stepwise exchange mechanism. A new magnetic analytical method and a theoretical model confirmed that the exchange mechanism is reasonable. When the metathesis reaction occurs between Cu^II ions and framework Zn^II ions, the magnetic exchange interaction of each pair of Cu^II centers gradually strengthens with increasing amount of framework Cu^II ions. By analyzing the changes of coupling constants in the Cu‐exchanged products, it was deduced that Zn4 and Zn3 are initially replaced, and then Zn1 and Zn2 are replaced later. The theoretical calculation further verified that Zn4 is replaced first, Zn3 next, then Zn1 and Zn2 last, and the coordination stability dominates the Cu/Zn exchange process. For the Ni/Zn and Co/Zn exchange processes, besides the coordination stability, the preferred coordination geometry was also considered in the stepwise‐exchange behavior. As Ni^II and Co^II ions especially favor octahedral coordination geometry in oxygen‐ligand fields, Ni^II ions and Co^II ions could only selectively exchange with the octahedral Zn^II ions, as was also confirmed by the experimental results. The stepwise metal‐exchange process occurs in a single crystal‐to‐single crystal fashion.     

Synthesis,spectral characterization,electrochemical studies and catalytic properties in Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions of the mononuclear PdII,trinuclear PdII(BPh2)2 and RuII?PdII?RuII type complexes containing 4‐amino‐1‐benzyl piperidine and phenyl groups

The ligand containing the 4‐amino‐1‐benzyl piperidine group, N, N′‐(4‐amino‐1‐benzyl piperidine)‐glyoxime, (LH₂) (1) was prepared from 4‐amino‐1‐benzyl piperidine with anti‐dichloroglyoxime at ? 15 °C in absolute Tetrahydrofuran (THF). In the trinuclear [Pd(L)₂Ru₂(phen)₄](ClO₄)₂ (4) and [Pd(L)₂Ru₂(bpy)₄](ClO₄)₂ (5) metal complexes, the Pd^II ion centered into the main oxime core by the coordination of the imino groups while the two Ru^II ions coordinated dianionic oxygen donors of the oxime groups and linked to the ligands of 1,10‐phenanthroline and 2,2′‐bipyridine. The mono and trinuclear metal complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, FT‐IR, UV–vis, ¹H and ¹³C‐NMR spectra, magnetic susceptibility measurements, molar conductivity, cyclic voltammetry, mass spectra, X‐ray powder techniques and their morphology by SEM measurements. The cyclic voltammetric results show that the cathodic peak (E_pc) potential of (3) shifts towards more positive values compared with that of (2) as a result of the BPh₂⁺‐bridged complex formation. The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction was used to investigate their activity as catalyst either prepared in‐situ or from well‐defined complexes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Three‐Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Order of Single‐Chain Magnets: A New Approach to Design Molecule‐Based Magnets

Two one‐dimensional compounds composed of a 1:1 ratio of Mn^III salen‐type complex and Ni^II oximato moiety with different counter anions, PF₆^? and BPh₄^?, were synthesized: [Mn(3,5‐Cl₂saltmen)Ni(pao)₂(phen)]PF₆ ( 1 ) and [Mn(5‐Clsaltmen)Ni(pao)₂(phen)]BPh₄ ( 2 ), where 3,5‐Cl₂saltmen^2?=N,N′‐(1,1,2,2‐tetramethylethylene)bis(3,5‐dichlorosalicylideneiminate); 5‐Clsaltmen^2?=N,N′‐(1,1,2,2‐tetramethylethylene)bis(5‐chlorosalicylideneiminate); pao^?=pyridine‐2‐aldoximate; and phen=1,10‐phenanthroline. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study was carried out for both compounds. In 1 and 2 , the chain topology is very similar forming an alternating linear chain with a [‐Mn^III‐ON‐Ni^II‐NO‐] repeating motif (where ‐ON‐ is the oximate bridge). The use of a bulky counteranion, such as BPh₄^?, located between the chains in 2 rather than PF₆^? in 1 , successfully led to the magnetic isolation of the chains in 2 . This minimization of the interchain interactions allows the study of the intrinsic magnetic properties of the chains present in 1 and 2 . While 1 and 2 possess, as expected, very similar paramagnetic properties above 15 K, their ground state is antiferromagnetic below 9.4 K and paramagnetic down to 1.8 K, respectively. Nevertheless, both compounds exhibit a magnet‐type behavior at temperatures below 6 K. While for 2 , the observed magnetism is well explained by a Single‐Chain Magnet (SCM) behavior, the magnet properties for 1 are induced by the presence in the material of SCM building units that order antiferromagnetically. By controlling both intra‐ and interchain magnetic interactions in this new [Mn^IIINi^II] SCM system, a remarkable AF phase with a magnet‐type behavior has been stabilized in relation with the intrinsic SCM properties of the chains present in 1 . This result suggests that the simultaneous enhancement of both intrachain (J) and interchain (J′) magnetic interactions (with keeping J ? J′), independently of the presence of AF phase might be an efficient route to design high temperature SCM‐based magnets.     

2‐Amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐thiadiazole as Bidentate Ligand

The amino substituted bidentate chelating ligand 2‐amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole (H₂ L ) was used to prepare 3:1‐type coordination compounds of iron(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II). In the iron(II) perchlorate complex [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·0.6MeOH·0.9H₂O a 1:1 mixture of mer and fac isomers is present whereas [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](BF₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O, [Co^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·2H₂O and [Ni^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O feature merely mer derivatives. Moessbauer spectroscopy and variable temperature magnetic measurements revealed the [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core to exist in the low‐spin state, whereas the [Co^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core resides in its high‐spin state, even at very low temperatures.     

Postsynthetic Improvement of the Physical Properties in a Metal–Organic Framework through a Single Crystal to Single Crystal Transmetallation

A single crystal to single crystal transmetallation process takes place in the three‐dimensional (3D) metal–organic framework (MOF) of formula Mg^II₂{Mg^II₄[Cu^II₂(Me₃mpba)₂]₃}?45 H₂O ( 1 ; Me₃mpba^4?=N,N′‐2,4,6‐trimethyl‐1,3‐phenylenebis(oxamate)). After complete replacement of the Mg^II ions within the coordination network and those hosted in the channels by either Co^II or Ni^II ions, 1 is transmetallated to yield two novel MOFs of formulae Co₂^II{Co^II₄[Cu^II₂(Me₃mpba)₂]₃}?56 H₂O ( 2 ) and Ni₂^II{Ni^II₄[Cu^II₂(Me₃mpba)₂]₃}? 54 H₂O ( 3 ). This unique postsynthetic metal substitution affords materials with higher structural stability leading to enhanced gas sorption and magnetic properties.     

Molecular Magnetic Materials Based on {CoIII(Tp*)(CN)3}− Cyanidometallate: Combined Magnetic,Structural and 59Co NMR Study

The cyanidocobaltate of formula fac-PPh₄[Co^III(^Me2Tp)(CN)₃] ⋅ CH₃CN ( 1 ) has been used as a metalloligand to prepare polynuclear magnetic complexes (^Me2Tp=hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)borate). The association of 1 with in situ prepared [Fe^II(bik)₂(MeCN)₂](OTf)₂ (bik=bis(1-methylimidazol-2-yl)ketone) leads to a molecular square of formula {[Co^III{(^Me2Tp)}(CN)₃]₂[Fe^II(bik)₂]₂}(OTf)₂ ⋅ 4MeCN ⋅ 2H₂O ( 2 ), whereas the self-assembly of 1 with preformed cluster [Co^II₂(OH₂)(piv)₄(Hpiv)₄] in MeCN leads to the two-dimensional network of formula {[Co^II₂(piv)₃]₂[Co^III(^Me2Tp)(CN)₃]₂ ⋅ 2CH₃CN}_∞ ( 3 ). These compounds were structurally characterized via single crystal X-ray analysis and their spectroscopic (FTIR, UV-Vis and ⁵⁹Co NMR) properties and magnetic behaviours were also investigated. Bulk magnetic susceptibility measurements reveal that 1 is diamagnetic and 3 is paramagnetic throughout the explored temperature range, whereas 2 exhibits sharp spin transition centered at ca. 292 K. Compound 2 also exhibits photomagnetic effects at low temperature, selective light irradiations allowing to promote reversibly and repeatedly low-spin⇔high-spin conversion. Besides, the diamagnetic nature of the Co(III) building block allows us studying these compounds by means of ⁵⁹Co NMR spectroscopy. Herein, a ⁵⁹Co chemical shift has been used as a magnetic probe to corroborate experimental magnetic data obtained from bulk magnetic susceptibility measurements. An influence of the magnetic state of the neighbouring atoms is observed on the ⁵⁹Co NMR signals. Moreover, for the very first time, ⁵⁹Co NMR technique has been successfully introduced to investigate molecular materials with distinct magnetic properties.     

Cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) complexes with 4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine

4′‐Cyanophenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (cptpy) was employed as an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate ligand to synthesize the compounds bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(II) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane solvate, [Co^II(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₂·CH₃NO₂, (I), and bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(III) tris(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane sesquisolvate, [Co^III(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₃·1.5CH₃NO₂, (II). In both complexes, the cobalt ions occupy a distorted octahedral geometry with two cptpy ligands in a meridional configuration. A greater distortion from octahedral geometry is observed in (I), which indicates a different steric consequence of the constrained ligand bite on the Co^II and Co^III ions. The crystal structure of (I) features an interlocked sheet motif, which differs from the one‐dimensional chain packing style present in (II). The lower dimensionality in (II) can be explained by the disturbance caused by the larger number of anions and solvent molecules involved in the crystal structure of (II). All atoms in (I) are on general positions, and the F atoms of one BF₄⁻ anion are disordered. In (II), one B atom is on an inversion center, necessitating disorder of the four attached F atoms, another B atom is on a twofold axis with ordered F atoms, and the C and N atoms of one nitromethane solvent molecule are on a twofold axis, causing disorder of the methyl H atoms. This relatively uncommon study of analogous Co^II and Co^III complexes provides a better understanding of the effects of different oxidation states on coordination geometry and crystal packing.     

Cyanide-bridged [Fe8M6] clusters displaying single-molecule magnetism (M=Ni) and electron-transfer-coupled spin transitions (M=Co)

Cyanide‐bridged metal complexes of [Fe₈M₆(μ‐CN)₁₄(CN)₁₀ (tp)₈(HL)₁₀(CH₃CN)₂][PF₆]₄?n CH₃CN?m H₂O (HL=3‐(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐[4‐(diphenylamino)phenyl]‐1H‐pyrazole), tp^?=hydrotris(pyrazolylborate), 1 : M=Ni with n=11 and m=7, and 2 : M=Co with n=14 and m=5) were prepared. Complexes 1 and 2 are isomorphous, and crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. They have tetradecanuclear cores composed of eight low‐spin (LS) Fe^III and six high‐spin (HS) M^II ions (M=Ni and Co), all of which are bridged by cyanide ions, to form a crown‐like core structure. Magnetic susceptibility measurements revealed that intramolecular ferro‐ and antiferromagnetic interactions are operative in 1 and in a fresh sample of 2 , respectively. Ac magnetic susceptibility measurements of 1 showed frequency‐dependent in‐ and out‐of‐phase signals, characteristic of single‐molecule magnetism (SMM), while desolvated samples of 2 showed thermal‐ and photoinduced intramolecular electron‐transfer‐coupled spin transition (ETCST) between the [(LS‐Fe^II)₃(LS‐Fe^III)₅(HS‐Co^II)₃(LS‐Co^III)₃] and the [(LS‐Fe^III)₈(HS‐Co^II)₆] states.     

Interplay of Magnetic Exchange Interactions and Ni?S?Ni Bond Angles in Polynuclear Nickel(II) Complexes

The ability of bridging thiophenolate groups (RS^?) to transmit magnetic exchange interactions between paramagnetic Ni^II ions is examined. Specific attention is paid to complexes with large Ni? SR? Ni angles. For this purpose, dinuclear [Ni₂L¹(μ‐OAc)?I₂][I₅] ( 2 ) and trinuclear [Ni₃L²(OAc)₂][BPh₄]₂ ( 3 ), where H₂L¹ and H₂L² represent 24‐membered macrocyclic amino‐thiophenol ligands, are prepared and fully characterized by IR‐ and UV/Vis spectroscopy, X‐ray crystallography, static magnetization M measurements and high‐field electron spin resonance (HF‐ESR). The dinuclear complex 2 has a central N₃Ni₂(μ‐S)₂(μ‐OAc)Ni₂N₃ core with a mean Ni? S? Ni angle of 92°. The macrocycle L² supports a trinuclear complex 3 , with distorted octahedral N₂O₂S₂ and N₂O₃S coordination environments for one central and two terminal Ni^II ions, respectively. The Ni? S? Ni angles are at 132.8° and 133.5°. We find that the variation of the bond angles has a very strong impact on the magnetic properties of the Ni complexes. In the case of the Ni₂‐complex, temperature T and magnetic field B dependencies of M reveal a ferromagnetic coupling J=?29 cm^?1 between two Ni^II ions (H=JS₁S₂). HF‐ESR measurements yield a negative axial magnetic anisotropy (D<0) which implies a bistable (easy axis) magnetic ground state. In contrast, for the Ni₃‐complex we find an appreciable antiferromagnetic coupling J′=97 cm^?1 between the Ni^II ions and a positive axial magnetic anisotropy (D>0) which implies an easy plane situation.     

Cobalt(II) Complexes with Dicyanamide — from Binuclear Entities to Chains

One binuclear complex [Co(bpm*)₂(dca)]₂(ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ) and two 1D chain Co^II complexes, {[Co(bpm)₂(dca)](ClO₄)}_n ( 2 ) and [Co(dmf)₂(dca)₂]_n ( 3 ), (bpm*: bis[(3, 5‐dimethyl)pyrazolyl]methane; bpm: bis(pyrazolyl)methane; dca: dicyanamide; dmf: N, N‐dimethyl formamide) have been prepared and structurally characterized. The cobalt atoms are hexa‐coordinated forming a slightly distorted octahedral coordination. Compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c, a = 9.849(3)Å, b = 21.944(7)Å, c = 13.814(5)Å, β = 94.824(6), Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0672, wR₂ = 0.1395. 1 is a binuclear complex linked by two dca ligands, and each Co^II ion is coordinated by two terminal bpm* ligands. Compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group Cmcm, a = 10.377(4)Å, b = 13.594(5)Å, c = 15.999(6)Å, Z = 4, R₁ = 0.0609, wR₂ = 0.1328. The structure of 2 can be described as a one‐dimensional zigzag chain of Co^II ions bridged by one dca ligand. Each Co^II ion in the chain is coordinated by two bpm ligands. Compound 3 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group C₂, a = 13.559(15)Å, b = 7.393(8)Å, c = 8.110(9)Å, β = 112.228(15), Z = 2, R₁ = 0.0260, wR₂ = 0.0760. 3 has a one‐dimensional linear chain of Co^II ions bridged by two dca ligands, in which each Co^II ion is coordinated with two dmf molecules.     

Diverse structures and magnetism of cobalt(II) and manganese(II) compounds with mixed azido and carboxylato bridges induced by methylpyridinium carboxylates

Herein we present a systematic study of the structures and magnetic properties of six coordination compounds with mixed azide and zwitterionic carboxylate ligands, [M(N₃)₂(2‐mpc)] (2‐mpc=N‐methylpyridinium‐2‐carboxylate; M=Co for 1 and Mn for 2 ), [M(N₃)₂(4‐mpc)] (4‐mpc=N‐methylpyridinium‐4‐carboxylate; M=Co for 3 and Mn for 4 ), [Co₃(N₃)₆(3‐mpc)₂(CH₃OH)₂] ( 5 ), and [Mn₃(N₃)₆(3‐mpc)₂] ( 6 ; 3‐mpc=N‐methylpyridinium‐3‐carboxylate). Compounds 1 – 3 consist of one‐dimensional uniform chains with (μ‐EO‐N₃)₂(μ‐COO) triple bridges (EO=end‐on); 5 is also a chain compound but with alternating [(μ‐EO‐N₃)₂(μ‐COO)] triple and [(EO‐N₃)₂] double bridges; Compound 4 contains two‐dimensional layers with alternating [(μ‐EO‐N₃)₂(μ‐COO)] triple, [(μ‐EO‐N₃)(μ‐COO)] double, and (EE‐N₃) single bridges (EE=end‐to‐end); 6 is a layer compound in which chains similar to those in 5 are cross‐linked by a μ₃‐1,1,3‐N₃ azido group. Magnetically, the three Co^II compounds ( 1 , 3 , and 5 ) all exhibit intrachain ferromagnetic interactions but show distinct bulk properties: 1 displays relaxation dynamics at very low temperature, 3 is an antiferromagnet with field‐induced metamagnetism due to weak antiferromagnetic interchain interactions, and 5 behaves as a noninnocent single‐chain magnet influenced by weak antiferromagnetic interchain interactions. The magnetic differences can be related to the interchain interactions through π–π stacking influenced by different substitution positions in the ligands and/or different magnitudes of intrachain coupling. All of the Mn^II compounds show overall intrachain/intralayer antiferromagnetic interactions. Compound 2 shows the usual one‐dimensional antiferromagnetism, whereas 4 and 6 exhibit different weak ferromagnetism due to spin canting below 13.8 and 4.6 K, respectively.     

Bis{2,6‐bis[3‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN2]pyridine‐κN}cobalt(II) dinitrate at 290 and 150 K

The title compound, [Co(C₂₉H₂₉N₅)₂](NO₃)₂, contains a six‐coordinate high‐spin Co^II ion with approximate local D_2d symmetry. The bond lengths and angles at cobalt undergo only small changes between the two temperatures, which confirms that the Co^II ion does not undergo a spin‐state transition over this temperature range.     

Two CoII coordination polymers of biphenyl‐2,2′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylic acid with flexible N‐donor ligands: syntheses,structures and magnetic properties

Two Co^II‐based coordination polymers, namely poly[(μ₄‐biphenyl‐2,2′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylato){μ₂‐1,3‐bis[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]benzene}dicobalt(II)], [Co₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)₂]_n or [Co₂(o,m‐bpta)(1,3‐bimb)₂]_n ( I ), and poly[[aqua(μ₄‐biphenyl‐2,2′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylato){1,4‐bis[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]benzene}dicobalt(II)] dihydrate], {[Co₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)₂(H₂O)₂]·4H₂O}_n or {[Co₂(o,m‐bpta)(1,4‐bimb)₂(H₂O)₂]·4H₂O}_n ( II ), were synthesized from a mixture of biphenyl‐2,2′,5,5′‐tetracarboxylic acid, i.e. [H₄(o,m‐bpta)], CoCl₂·6H₂O and N‐donor ligands under solvothermal conditions. The complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and powder X‐ray diffraction analysis. The bridging (o,m‐bpta)^4? ligands combine with Co^II ions in different μ₄‐coordination modes, leading to the formation of one‐dimensional chains. The central Co^II atoms display tetrahedral [CoN₂O₂] and octahedral [CoN₂O₄] geometries in I and II , respectively. The bis[(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)methyl]benzene (bimb) ligands adopt trans or cis conformations to connect Co^II ions, thus forming two three‐dimensional (3D) networks. Complex I shows a (2,4)‐connected 3D network with left‐ and right‐handed helical chains constructed by (o,m‐bpta)^4? ligands. Complex II is a (4,4)‐connected 3D novel network with ribbon‐like chains formed by (o,m‐bpta)^4? linkers. Magnetic studies indicate an orbital contribution to the magnetic moment of I and II due to the longer Co…Co distances. An attempt has been made to fit the χ_MT results to the magnetic formulae for mononuclear Co^II complexes, the fitting indicating the presence of weak antiferromagnetic interactions between the Co^II ions.     

Mn4 single-molecule magnets with a planar diamond core and S=9

The syntheses and magnetic properties are reported for three Mn₄ single-molecule magnets (SMMs): [Mn₄(hmp)₆(NO₃)₂(MeCN)₂](ClO₄)₂·2MeCN (3), [Mn₄(hmp)₆(NO₃)₄]·(MeCN) (4), and [Mn₄(hmp)₄(acac)₂(MeO)₂](ClO₄)₂·2MeOH (5). In each complex there is a planar diamond core of Mn^III ₂Mn^II ₂ ions. An analysis of the variable-temperature and variable-field magnetization data indicate that all three molecules have intramolecular ferromagnetic coupling and a S=9 ground state. The presence of a frequency-dependent alternating current susceptibility signal indicates a significant energy barrier between the spin-up and spin-down states for each of these three Mn^III ₂Mn^II ₂ complexes. The fact that these complexes are SMMs has been confirmed by the observation of hysteresis in the plot of magnetization versus magnetic field measured for single crystals of complexes 3 and 4. The hysteresis loops for both of these complexes exhibit steps characteristic of quantum tunneling of magnetization. Complex 4 shows its first step at zero field, whereas the first step for complex 3 is shifted to −0.10 T. This shift is attributable to weak intermolecular antiferromagnetic exchange interactions present for complex 3.     

Hexakis(dimethylformamide)iron(II) complex cation in hexahalorhenate(IV)-based salts: synthesis,X-ray structure and magnetic properties

Abstract

Two iron(II)-rhenium(IV) compounds of general formula [Fe^II(dmf)₆][Re^IVX₆] [X = Cl (1) and Br (2); dmf = N,N-dimethylformamide] have been prepared and characterized. X-ray powder diffraction measurements on samples of 1 and 2 support the same structure for both systems. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic system with space group Pī. Each iron(II) is six-coordinate and bonded to six oxygens from six dmf molecules building a distorted octahedral environment. Rhenium(IV) is six-coordinate by six halide anions in an almost regular octahedral geometry. The magnetic properties were investigated from variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements performed on microcrystalline samples of 1 and 2, whose experimental data were reproduced by a model of two isolated paramagnetic centers [S = 2 (Fe^II) and S = 3/2 (Re^IV)] with large values of zero-field splitting (zfs) parameter.     

What Controls the Magnetic Exchange Interaction in Mixed‐ and Homo‐Valent Mn7 Disc‐Like Clusters? A Theoretical Perspective

Density functional theory (DFT) studies have been undertaken to compute the magnetic exchange and to probe the origin of the magnetic interactions in two hetero‐ and two homo‐valent heptanuclear manganese disc‐like clusters, of formula [Mn^II₄Mn^IV₃(tea)(teaH₂)₃(peolH)₄] ( 1 ), [Mn^II₄Mn^III₃F₃(tea)(teaH)(teaH₂)₂(piv)₄(Hpiv)(chp)₃] ( 2 ), [Mn^II₇(pppd)₆(tea)(OH)₃] ( 3 ) and [Mn^II₇ (paa)₆(OMe)₆] ( 4 ) (teaH₃=triethanolamine, peolH₄=pentaerythritol, Hpiv=pivalic acid, Hchp=6‐chloro‐2‐hydroxypyridine, pppd=1‐phenyl‐3‐(2‐pyridyl) propane‐1,3‐dione; paaH=N‐(2‐pyridinyl)acetoacetamide). DFT calculations yield J values, which reproduce the magnetic susceptibility data very well for all four complexes; these studies are also highlighting the likely ageing/stability problems in two of the complexes. It is found that the spin ground states, S, for complexes 1 – 4 are drastically different, varying from S=29/2 to S=1/2. These values are found to be controlled by the nature of the oxidation state of the metal ions and minor differences present in the structures. Extensive magneto–structural correlations are developed for the seven building unit dimers present in the complexes, with the correlations unlocking the reasons behind the differences in the magnetic properties observed. Independent of the oxidation state of the metal ions, the Mn‐O‐Mn/Mn‐F‐Mn angles are found to be the key parameters, which significantly influence the sign as well as the magnitude of the J values. The magneto–structural correlations developed here, have broad applicability and can be utilised to understand the magnetic properties of other Mn clusters.