Two‐Coordinate Iron(I) Complex [Fe{N(SiMe3)2}2]−: Synthesis,Properties, and Redox Activity

First‐row two‐coordinate complexes are attracting much interest. Herein, we report the high‐yield isolation of the linear two‐coordinate iron(I) complex salt [K(L)][Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] (L=18‐crown‐6 or crypt‐222) through the reduction of either [Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] or its three‐coordinate phosphine adduct [Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂(PCy₃)]. Detailed characterization is gained through X‐ray diffraction, variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy, and magnetic susceptibility studies. One‐ and two‐electron oxidation through reaction with I₂ is further found to afford the corresponding iodo iron(II) and diiodo iron(III) complexes.     

Two‐Coordinate Iron(I) Complex [Fe{N(SiMe3)2}2]−: Synthesis,Properties, and Redox Activity

First‐row two‐coordinate complexes are attracting much interest. Herein, we report the high‐yield isolation of the linear two‐coordinate iron(I) complex salt [K(L)][Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] (L=18‐crown‐6 or crypt‐222) through the reduction of either [Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] or its three‐coordinate phosphine adduct [Fe{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂(PCy₃)]. Detailed characterization is gained through X‐ray diffraction, variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy, and magnetic susceptibility studies. One‐ and two‐electron oxidation through reaction with I₂ is further found to afford the corresponding iodo iron(II) and diiodo iron(III) complexes.     

Einfluß der Ringatome auf die Struktur von Triel‐Pentel‐Heterozyklen – Synthese und Molekülstrukturen von [Me2InAs(SiMe3)2]2 und [Me2InSb(SiMe3)2]3

Influence of the Ring Atoms on the Structure of Triel‐Pentel Heterocycles – Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Me₂InAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InSb(SiMe₃)₂]₃ Triel‐pentel heterocycles [Me₂InE(SiMe₃)₂]_x have been prepared by dehalosilylation reactions from Me₂InCl and E(SiMe₃)₃ (E = As, x = 2; E = Sb, x = 3) and characterised by NMR spectroscopy and by X‐ray crystal structure analyses. In addition the X‐ray crystal structures of [Me₂GaAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ are reported. The compounds complete a family of 13 identically substituted heterocycles [Me₂ME(SiMe₃)₂]_x (M = Al, Ga, In; E = N, P, As, Sb, Bi; x = 2, 3), whose structures were investigated depending on the ring atoms M and E. The tendencies that have been observed concerning the ring sizes can be explained by the interplay of the atomic radii of the central atoms and the sterical demand of the ligands. After a formal separation of the M–E bonds in σ bonds and dative bonds the characteristic differences and trends in the endocyclic and exocyclic bond angles of both centres M and E can be interpreted on the basis of a simple Lewis acid/base adduct model.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Alkali Metal Guanidinates

Reactions of 1,3-diisopropylcarbodiimide with alkali metal amides, MN（SiMe3）2 （M=Li or Na） in hexane or THF produced the alkali metal guanidinates { （i-PrN）2C [N（SiMe3）2]Li }2 （1） and { （i-PrN）2C[N（SiMe3）2]Na（THF） } 2 （2） in nearly quantitative yields. Both complexes 1 and 2 were well characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectra, ^1H and ^13C NMR spectra, and X-ray diffraction. It was found that the guanidinates adopt different coordination modes in these complexes.     

Reaktion von Bis(trimethylsilylamino)dichlorsilan mit Titantetrachlorid ‐ Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [μ‐ClTiCl2N(SiMe3)SiCl2NH2]2

TiCl₄ reacts quantitatively with Cl₂Si(NHSiMe₃)₂ in n‐pentane under evolution of Me₃SiCl yielding [μ‐ClTiCl₂N(SiMe₃)‐SiCl₂NH₂]₂ ( 1 ), which is obtained as a yellow, crystalline solid forming small intergrown needles, that rapidly hydrolyse. The product 1 shows a thermal stability up to 80?C. The molecular structure of 1 has been solved by X‐ray powder diffraction methods and it could be confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray structure determination at ‐70 ?C. Accordingly, in the solid 1 is a dimer ([μ‐ClTiCl₂N(SiMe₃)SiCl₂NH₂]₂, P2₁/n (no. 14), Z = 2, a = 1504.89(6), b = 1296.33(6), c = 710.90(4) pm, and β = 91.276(2)?).     

First Copper(I) and Silver(I) Complexes Containing Phosphanylphosphido Ligands

Three new complexes with phosphanylphosphido ligands, [Cu₄{μ₂‐P(SiMe₃)‐PtBu}₄] ( 1 ), [Ag₄{μ₂‐P(SiMe₃)‐PtBu₂}₄] ( 2 ) and [Cu{η¹‐P(SiMe₃)‐PiPr₂}₂]^–[Li(Diglyme)₂]⁺ ( 3 ) were synthesized and structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. Complexes 1 and 2 were obtained in the reactions of lithium derivative of diphosphane tBu₂P‐P(SiMe₃)Li · 2.7THF with CuCl and [iBu₃PAgCl]₄, respectively. The X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that the complexes 1 and 2 present macrocyclic, tetrameric form with Cu₄P₄ and Ag₄P₄ core. Complex 3 was prepared in the reaction of CuCl with a different derivative of lithiated diphosphane iPr₂P‐P(SiMe₃)Li · 2(Diglyme). Surprisingly, the X‐ray analysis of 3 revealed that in this reaction instead of the tetramer the monomeric form, ionic complex [Cu{η¹‐P(SiMe₃)‐PiPr₂}₂]^–[Li(Diglyme)₂]⁺ was formed.     

Studien zur Reaktion von [Me2AlP(SiMe3)2]2 mit basenstabilisierten Organogalliumchloriden und ‐hydriden

Investigations on the Reactivity of [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with Base‐stabilized Organogalliumhalides and ‐hydrides [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 ) reacts with dmap?Ga(Cl)Me₂, dmap?Ga(Me)Cl₂, dmap?GaCl₃ and dmap?Ga(H)Me₂ with Al‐P bond cleavage and subsequent formation of heterocyclic [Me₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ) as well as dmap?AlMe_xCl_3?x (x = 3 8 ; 2 3 ; 1 4 ; 0 5 ). The reaction between equimolar amounts of dmap?Al(Me₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ and dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)Cl yield dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ ( 6 ) and dmap?AlMe₂Cl ( 3 ). 2 – 8 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, 2 and 6 also by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Dinuclear Dysprosium and Ytterbium Complexes Incorporating N,N‐Bis(pyrrolyl‐α‐methyl)‐N‐methylamine Ligand: Syntheses and Structures

Reaction of DyCl₃ with two equivalents of NaN(SiMe₃)₂ in THF yielded {Dy(μ‐Cl)[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂(THF)}₂ ( 1 ). X‐ray crystal structure analysis revealed that 1 is a centrosymmetric dimer with asymmetrically bridging chloride ligands. The metal coordination arrangement can be best described as distorted trigonal bipyramid. The bond lengths of Ln–Cl and Ln–N showed a decreasing trend with the contraction of the size of Ln³⁺. Treatment of N,N‐bis(pyrrolyl‐α‐methyl)‐N‐methylamine (H₂dpma) with 1 and known compound {Yb(μ‐Cl)[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂(THF)}₂, respectively, led to the formations of [Dy(μ‐Cl)(dpma)(THF)₂]₂ ( 2 ) and {Yb(μ‐Cl)[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂(THF)}₂ ( 3 ). Compounds 2 and 3 were fully characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography, elemental analysis, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. Structure determination indicated that 2 and 3 exhibit as centrosymmetric dimers with asymmetrically bridging chloride ligands. One pot reactions involving LnCl₃ (Ln = Dy and Yb), LiN(SiMe₃)₂, and H₂dpma were explored and desired products 2 and 3 were not yielded, which indicated that 1 and {Yb(μ‐Cl)[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂(THF)}₂ are the demanding precursors to synthesize Dysprosium and Ytterbium complexes supported by dpma^2– ligand. Compounds 2 and 3 are the first reported lanthanide complexes chelated by dpma^2– ligand.     

Synthese und Strukturen von [Cu8As3(AsSiMe3)2(dppb)4]+‐[Cu{As2(SiMe3)2}{As4(SiMe3)4}]‐, [Cu8As3(AsSiMe3)2(dppb)4]+‐[Cu{As(SiMe3)2}2]‐ und [Cu10(Sb3)2(SbSiMe3)2(dppm)6]

The reaction of CuCl, LiAs(SiMe₃)₂ and dppb (Bis(diphenylphosphino)butane) leads to the formation of ionic cluster complexes. Depending on the reaction conditions one can isolate [Cu₈As₃(AsSiMe₃)₂(dppb)₄]⁺[Cu{As₂(SiMe₃)₂}{As₄(SiMe₃)₄}]^‐ ( 1 ) and [Cu₈As₃(AsSiMe₃)₂(dppb)₄]⁺[Cu{As(SiMe₃)₂}₂]^‐ ( 2 ). The same reaction of CuCl, dppm (Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) and LiSb(SiMe₃)₂ leads to the neutral cluster complex [Cu₁₀(Sb₃)₂(SbSiMe₃)₂(dppm)₆] ( 3 ). The structures of 1‐3 have been solved by X‐ray single crystal analyses.     

Homoleptische Amide von Zink,Cadmium und Quecksilber

Homoleptic Amides of Zinc, Cadmium, and Mercury ZnCl₂, CdCl₂ and HgCl₂ react with the lithium salts ( 1 a–5 a ) of the sterically demanding secundary amines HN(SiMe₃)Ph ( 1 ), HN(SiMe₃)C₆H₃Me₂‐2,6 ( 2 ), HN(SiMe₃)C₆H₃ⁱPr₂‐2,6 ( 3 ), HN(SiMe₃)C₆H₃^tBu₂‐2,5 ( 4 ), and HN(SiMe₂NMe₂)C₆H₃ⁱPr₂‐2,6 ( 5 ) yielding the corresponding homoleptic metal amides Zn[N(SiMe₂R′)R]₂ ( 1 b–5 b ), Cd[N(SiMe₂R′)R]₂ ( 1 c , 5 c ), and Hg[N(SiMe₂R′)R]₂ ( 1 d–5 d ), respectively. Except the dimeric {Zn[N(SiMe₃)Ph]₂}₂ ( 1 b ), all complexes are monomeric. The compounds were characterized by elemental analyses, molecular weight determinations, NMR and mass spectra. Furthermore, the zinc amides ( 1 b–5 b ) and the mercury amides 1 d–3 d and 5 d were characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis. Except 1 b and 5 b , they show a linear N–M–N arrangement.     

Strukturen zweifach metallierter Derivate von 3, 3‐Dimethyl‐1, 5‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐1, 5‐diaza‐pentan mit Lithium und Aluminium sowie zweier Donor‐substituierter Digallane

Structural Characterization of Bis(metallated) Derivatives of 3, 3‐Dimethyl‐1, 5‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐1, 5‐diaza‐pentane with Lithium and Aluminum and of two Donor‐substituted Digallanes The diaminopropane derivative Me₂C[CH₂N(H)SiMe₃]₂ is metallated with n‐butyllithium and lithium tetrahydridoaluminate to obtain Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃]₂ and Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃][CH₂N(AlH₂)SiMe₃], respectively. Both compounds exhibit a central eight‐membered ring, Li₄N₄ or Li₂Al₂N₄. Me₂C[CH₂N(Li)SiMe₃]₂ reacts with Ga₂Cl₄ · 2dioxane under formation of the corresponding tetra(amino)digallane. This is monomeric, in contrast to a dimeric tetraalkoxy‐substituted digallane, Ga₄O^tBu₈. All compounds were characterized by single crystal X‐ray crystallography.     

Highly Fluorinated Tris(indazolyl)borate Silylamido Complexes of the Heavier Alkaline Earth Metals: Synthesis,Characterization, and Efficient Catalytic Intramolecular Hydroamination

Heteroleptic silylamido complexes of the heavier alkaline earth elements calcium and strontium containing the highly fluorinated 3‐phenyl hydrotris(indazolyl)borate {F₁₂‐Tp^{4Bo, 3Ph}}^? ligand have been synthesized by using salt metathesis reactions. The homoleptic precursors [Ae{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] (Ae=Ca, Sr) were treated with [Tl(F₁₂‐Tp^{4Bo, 3Ph})] in pentane to form the corresponding heteroleptic complexes [(F₁₂‐Tp^{4Bo, 3Ph})Ae{N(SiMe₃)₂}] (Ae=Ca ( 1 ); Sr ( 3 )). Compounds 1 and 3 are inert towards intermolecular redistribution. The molecular structures of 1 and 3 have been determined by using X‐ray diffraction. Compound 3 exhibits a Sr ??? MeSi agostic distortion. The synthesis of the homoleptic THF‐free compound [Ca{N(SiMe₂H)₂}₂] ( 4 ) by transamination reaction between [Ca{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] and HN(SiMe₂H)₂ is also reported. This precursor constitutes a convenient starting material for the subsequent preparation of the THF‐free complex [(F₁₂‐Tp^{4Bo, 3Ph})Ca{N(SiMe₂H)₂}] ( 5 ). Compound 5 is stabilized in the solid state by a Ca???β‐Si?H agostic interaction. Complexes 1 and 3 have been used as precatalysts for the intramolecular hydroamination of 2,2‐dimethylpent‐4‐en‐1‐amine. Compound 1 is highly active, converting completely 200 equivalents of aminoalkene in 16 min with 0.50 mol % catalyst loading at 25 °C.     

Synthese und Kristallstrukturen der Zink-Amido-Komplexe [Zn(NPh2)2]2 und [Zn(NPh2)2(THF)2]

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of the Zinc Amido Complexes [Zn(NPh₂)₂]₂ and [Zn(NPh₂)₂(THF)₂] Zinc diphenylamide is prepared from Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and diphenylamine by transamination reaction. The compound is characterized by a crystal structure analysis. According to it [Zn(NPh₂)₂]₂ forms centrosymmetric dimeric molecules with Zn–N distances of 185.9 pm for the terminally bonded NPh₂^– ligand and Zn–N distances of 204.0 and 202.6 pm in the four-membered ring. From tetrahydrofuran solutions [Zn(NPh₂)₂(THF)₂] crystallizes as monomeric molecular complex with Zn–N bond lengths of 192.2 pm in average.     

Amidinato Germylene‐Zinc Complexes: Synthesis,Bonding, and Reactivity

Despite the explosive growth of germylene compounds as ligands in transition metal complexes, there is a modicum of precedence for the germylene zinc complexes. In this work, the synthesis and characterization of new germylene zinc complexes [PhC(NtBu)₂Ge{N(SiMe₃)₂}→ZnX₂]₂ (X= Br ( 2 ) and I ( 3 )) supported by (benz)‐amidinato germylene ligands are reported. The solid‐state structures of 2 and 3 have been validated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies, which revealed the dimeric nature of the complexes, with distorted tetrahedral geometries around the Ge and Zn center. DFT calculations reveal that the Ge–Zn bonds in 2 and 3 are dative in nature. The reaction of 2 with elemental sulfur resulted in the first structurally characterized germathione stabilized ZnBr₂ complexes PhC(NtBu)₂Ge(=S){N(SiMe₃)₂}→ZnBr₂ ( 5 ). Therefore, the Ge=S in 5 is in‐between Ge–S single and Ge=S double bond length, owing to the coordination of a sulfur lone pair of electrons to ZnBr₂.     

An N‐Heterocyclic Silylene‐Stabilized Digermanium(0) Complex

The synthesis of an N‐heterocyclic silylene‐stabilized digermanium(0) complex is described. The reaction of the amidinate‐stabilized silicon(II) amide [LSiN(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ; L=PhC(NtBu)₂) with GeCl₂?dioxane in toluene afforded the Si^II–Ge^II adduct [L{(Me₃Si)₂N}Si→GeCl₂] ( 2 ). Reaction of the adduct with two equivalents of KC₈ in toluene at room temperature afforded the N‐heterocyclic carbene silylene‐stabilized digermanium(0) complex [L{(Me₃Si)₂N}Si→ Ge?Ge←Si{N(SiMe₃)₂}L] ( 3 ). X‐ray crystallography and theoretical studies show conclusively that the N‐heterocyclic silylenes stabilize the singlet digermanium(0) moiety by a weak synergic donor–acceptor interaction.     

Lewis Base Assisted Magnesium Complexes Incorporating Pyrrolyl and Ketiminate Ligands: Synthesis,Structural Diversity and Characterization

A series of four, five and six‐coordinated magnesium derivatives integrating with substituted pyrrole and ketimine ligands are conveniently synthesized. Reaction of two equiv of 2‐dimethylaminomethyl pyrrole with Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in THF affords the monomeric magnesium complex Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH₂NMe₂)]₂ (THF)₂ ( 1 ) in high yield along with elimination of two equiv of HN(SiMe₃)₂. Similarly, the reaction between two equiv of 2‐t‐butylaminomethyl pyrrole and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in THF renders the magnesium derivative, Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH₂NH^tBu)]₂(THF)2₂( 2 ) in good yield. Interestingly, reaction between two equiv of 2‐t‐butylaminomethyl pyrrole and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ in toluene, instead of THF, generates Mg[C₄H₃N(2‐CH2NH^tBu)]₂ ( 3 ), also in high yield. Furthermore, the assembly of two equiv of ketimine ligand, HOCMeCHCMeNAr (Ar = C₆H₃‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂) and Mg[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂, yields five‐coordinated magnesium derivatives, Mg(OCMeCHCMeNAr)₂(THF) ( 4 ) and Mg(OCMeCHCMeNAr)₂(OEt₂) ( 5 ), using THF and diethyl ether, respectively. All the aforementioned derivatives are characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy as well as 1 , 3 , 4 and 5 are subjected to X‐ray diffraction analysis in solid state.     

Bis(arylimido) Molybdenum(VI) Amidinate and Guanidinate Complexes; Molecular Structures of [(ArN)2MoMe{N(Cy)C[N(i‐Pr)2]N(Cy)}] (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3; Cy = Cyclohexyl) and [(2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3N)2MoCl2] · [NH=C(C6H5)CH(SiMe3)2]

The reaction of [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · DME (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) with lithium amidinates or guanidinates resulted in molybdenum(VI) complexes [(ArN)₂MoCl{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy (cyclohexyl), R² = Me ( 2 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 3 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(SiMe₃)₂ ( 4 ); R¹ = SiMe₃, R² = C₆H₅ ( 5 )) with five coordinated molybdenum atoms. Methylation of these compounds was exemplified by the reactions of 2 and 3 with MeLi affording the corresponding methylates [(ArN)₂MoMe{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy, R² = Me ( 6 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 7 )). The analogous reaction of 1 with bulky [N(SiMe₃)C(C₆H₅)C(SiMe₃)₂]Li · THF did not give the corresponding metathesis product, but a Schiff base adduct [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · [NH=C(C₆H₅)CH(SiMe₃)₂] ( 8 ) in low yield. The molecular structures of 7 and 8 are established by the X‐ray single crystal structural analysis.     

Synthese und Struktur des tetrameren Tris(trimethylsilyl)silylindium(I) und neuer silylsubstituierter Indiumverbindungen

Synthesis and Structure of Tetrameric Tris(trimethylsilyl)indium(I) and of New Silyl substituted Indium Compounds The reaction of InCp* with [LiSi(SiMe₃)₃·3thf] yielded in the first silylsubstituted tetrahedrane of indium [In₄{Si(SiMe₃)₃}₄] ( 1 ). It crystallizes together with [In{Si(SiMe₃)₃}₃] ( 2 ) in dark green crystals. Colourless crystals of [Li(OH)(OSiMe₃)In{Si(SiMe₃)₃}₂]₂ ( 3 ) were isolated as a byproduct from this reaction. It's structural core are three connected four membered rings made up of In‐, Li‐ and O‐atoms. From the reaction of [InOSO₂CF₃] with [LiSi(SiMe₃)₃·3thf] colourless crystals of [In{Si(SiMe₃)₃}₂OSO₂CF₃·thf] ( 4 ) were isolated. InCp* reacted with [LiSiMe(SiMe₃)₂·3thf] to form the orange‐coloured monoindane [In{SiMe(SiMe₃)₂}₃] ( 5 ). 1 – 4 were characterized by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Untersuchungen zu Reaktionen des Diphosphanylsilans iPr2Si(PH2)2 mit Erdalkalimetallsilazaniden

The reaction of iPr₂Si(PH₂)₂ ( 1 ) with [Ca{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂(THF)₂] at 25 °C in molar ratio 1:1 yields the compound [Ca₃{iPr₂Si(PH)₂}₃(THF)₆] ( 2 ). Compound 2 consists of two Ca₂P₃ trigonal bipyramids with one conjoint calcium corner and SiiPr₂ bridged phosphorus atoms. In contrast, the same reaction at 60 °C yield the complex [Ca({P(SiiPr₂)₂PH}₂(THF)₄] ( 3 ). The isotype strontium compound [Sr({P(SiiPr₂)₂PH}₂(THF)₄] ( 4 ) was obtained from the reaction of iPr₂Si(PH₂)₂ with [Sr{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂(DME)₂]. The Compounds 2 – 4 were characterised by single crystal X‐ray diffraction, elemental analysis as well as IR and NMR spectroscopic techniques.     

Monomeric Homoleptic (2‐Pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amido Complexes of the Divalent Metals Mg,Mn, Fe,Co, and Zn

The transamination reaction of M[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amine yields the corresponding homoleptic metal bis[(2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amides] of Mg ( 1 ), Mn ( 2 ), Fe ( 3 ), Co ( 4 ) and Zn ( 5 ). All these compounds crystallize from hexane isotypic in the space group C2/c. From toluene the zinc derivative precipitates as toluene solvate 5 ·toluene. The molecular structures of these compounds are very similar with large NMN angles to the amide nitrogen atoms with NMN values of 148° ( 1 ) and 150° ( 5 ) for the diamagnetic compounds and 156° for the paramagnetic derivatives 2 and 3 . The Co derivative 4 displays a rather small NCoN angle of 142°. Different synthetic routes have been explored for compound 3 which is also available via the metallation reaction of bis(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)iron with (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amine and via the metathesis reaction of lithium (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide with [(thf)₂FeCl₂]. In course of the metathesis reaction, an equimolar amount of lithium (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide and [(thf)₂FeCl₂] yields heteroleptic (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amido iron(II) chloride ( 6 ) which crystallizes as a centrosymmetric dimeric molecule. The oxidative C‐C coupling reaction of 5 with Sn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ leads to the formation of tin(II) 1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane, tin metal and Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂.