The Photochemistry of the (Cycloalkene)(hydro)(trispyrazolylborato)iridium Complexes [Ir(η4-cod)(TpMe2)] and [Ir(η2-coe)H2(TpMe2)]: the Formation of [IrH4(TpMe2)] and [Ir(CO)H2(TpMe2)]

Photolysis of [Ir(η²-coe)H₂(Tp^Me2)] ( 1 ; Tp^Me2=hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borato, coe=(Z)-cyclooctene) in CH₃OH gives a mixture of [IrH₄(Tp^Me2)] ( 4 ) and [Ir(CO)H₂(Tp^Me2)] ( 5 ) in a ca. 1 : 1 ratio. Mass-spectral analysis of the distillate of the reaction mixture at the end of the photolysis shows the presence of coe. When pure CD₃OD is used as solvent, the deuteride complexes [IrD₄(Tp^Me2)] ((D₄)- 4 ) and [Ir(CO)D₂(Tp^Me2)] ((D₂)- 5 ) are obtained. Also the photolysis of [Ir(η⁴-cod)(Tp^Me2)] ( 3 ) (cod=cycloocta-1,5-diene) gives 4 and 5 . A key feature of this photoreaction is the intramolecular dehydrogenation of cod with formation of cycloocta-1,3,5-triene, detected by mass spectroscopy at the end of the photolysis. Labeling experiments using CD₃OD show that the hydrides in 4 originate from MeOH. When ¹³CH₃OH is used as solvent, [Ir(¹³CO)H₂(Tp^Me2)] is formed demonstrating that CH₃OH is the source of the CO ligand. The observation that the photolysis of both 1 and 3 give the same product mixture is attributed to the formation of a common intermediate, i.e., the coordinatively unsaturated 16e⁻ species {IrH₂(Tp^Me2)}.     

Methoxide Coordination at the Pocket of [CuIITpCum,Me] and a Simple Model for the Cu Center of Galactose Oxidase

An unusually negative oxidation potential is found for the tyrosine residue in the center of fungal galactose oxidase. The complex [Cu(Tp^Cum,Me){O(MeS)C₆H₄}] (see picture on the right; Tp^Cum,Me=hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate) offers insight into the mode of (cysteinyl-tyrosine) coordination to the copper center, and the reason for the low oxidation potential.     

A family of four-coordinate iron(II) complexes bearing the sterically hindered tris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand Tp(tBu,Me)

A new family of 14‐electron, four‐coordinate iron(II) complexes of the general formula [Tp^tBu,MeFeX] (Tp^tBu,Me is the sterically hindered hydrotris(3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐methyl‐pyrazolyl) borate ligand and X=Cl ( 1 ), Br, I) were synthesized by salt metathesis of FeX₂ with Tp^tBu,MeK. The related fluoride complex was prepared by reaction of 1 with AgBF₄. Chloride 1 proved to be a good precursor for ligand substitution reactions, generating a series of four‐coordinate iron(II) complexes with carbon, oxygen, and sulphur ligands. All of these complexes were fully characterized by conventional spectroscopic methods and most were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic analysis. Magnetic measurements for all complexes agreed with a high‐spin (d⁶, S=2) electronic configuration. The halide series enabled the estimation of the covalent radius of iron in these complexes as 1.24 Å.     

Tris(mercaptoimidazolyl)hydroborato complexes of cobalt and iron, [TmPh]2M (M=Fe,Co): structural comparisons with their tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborato counterparts

The tris(mercaptophenylimidazolyl)borate iron and cobalt complexes [Tm^Ph]₂M (M=Fe, Co) have been synthesized by reaction of [Tm^Ph]Tl with MI₂. Structural characterization by X-ray diffraction demonstrates that the potentially tridentate [Tm^Ph] ligand binds through only two sulfur donors in these ‘sandwich’ complexes and that the ‘tetrahedral’ metal centers supplement the bonding by interactions with the two B–H groups. Comparison of the structures of [Tm^Ph]₂M (M=Fe, Co) with the related tris(pyrazolyl)borate [Tp^Ph]₂M counterparts indicates that the tris(mercaptoimidazolyl) ligand favors lower primary coordination numbers in divalent metal complexes. The trivalent complexes, {[Tp^Ph]₂Fe}[ClO₄] and {[pzBm^Me]₂Co}I, however, exhibit octahedral coordination, with the ligands binding using their full complement of donor atoms.     

Reactivity Studies of Iridium Pyridylidenes [TpMe2Ir(C6H5)2(C(CH)3C(R)NH] (R=H,Me, Ph)

The reactivity of a series of iridium? pyridylidene complexes with the formula [Tp^Me2Ir(C₆H₅)₂(C(CH)₃C(R)N H] ( 1 a – 1 c ) towards a variety of substrates, from small molecules, such as H₂, O₂, carbon oxides, and formaldehyde, to alkenes and alkynes, is described. Most of the observed reactivity is best explained by invoking 16 e^? unsaturated [Tp^Me2Ir(phenyl)(pyridyl)] intermediates, which behave as internal frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs). H₂ is heterolytically split to give hydride? pyridylidene complexes, whilst CO, CO₂, and H₂C?O provide carbonyl, carbonate, and alkoxide species, respectively. Ethylene and propene form five‐membered metallacycles with an IrCH₂CH(R)N (R=H, Me) motif, whereas, in contrast, acetylene affords four‐membered iridacycles with the IrC(?CH₂)N moiety. C₆H₅(C?O)H and C₆H₅C?CH react with formation of Ir? C₆H₅ and Ir? C?CPh bonds and the concomitant elimination of a molecule of pyridine and benzene, respectively. Finally the reactivity of compounds 1 a – 1 c against O₂ is described. Density functional theory calculations that provide theoretical support for these experimental observations are also reported.     

Potential Precursors for Terminal Methylidene Rare-Earth-Metal Complexes Supported by a Superbulky Tris(pyrazolyl)borato Ligand

A series of solvent-free heteroleptic terminal rare-earth-metal alkyl complexes stabilized by a superbulky tris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand with the general formula [Tp^tBu,MeLnMeR] have been synthesized and fully characterized. Treatment of the heterobimetallic mixed methyl/tetramethylaluminate compounds [Tp^tBu,MeLnMe(AlMe₄)] (Ln=Y, Lu) with two equivalents of the mild halogenido transfer reagents SiMe₃X (X=Cl, I) gave [Tp^tBu,MeLnX₂] in high yields. The addition of only one equivalent of SiMe₃Cl to [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(AlMe₄)] selectively afforded the desired mixed methyl/chloride complex [Tp^tBu,MeLuMeCl]. Further reactivity studies of [Tp^tBu,MeLuMeCl] with LiR or KR (R=CH₂Ph, CH₂SiMe₃) through salt metathesis led to the monomeric mixed-alkyl derivatives [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(CH₂SiMe₃)] and [Tp^tBu,MeLuMe(CH₂Ph)], respectively, in good yields. The SiMe₄ elimination protocols were also applicable when using SiMe₃X featuring more weakly coordinating moieties (here X=OTf, NTf₂). X-ray structure analyses of this diverse set of new [Tp^tBu,MeLnMeR/X] compounds were performed to reveal any electronic and steric effects of the varying monoanionic ligands R and X, including exact cone-angle calculations of the tridentate tris(pyrazolyl)borato ligand. Deeper insights into the reactivity of these potential precursors for terminal alkylidene rare-earth-metal complexes were gained through NMR spectroscopic studies.     

Synthesis,Characterization and Assessment of the Antioxidant Activity of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Cd(II) Complexes Derived from Scorpionate Ligands

Seeking to enrich the yet less explored field of scorpionate complexes bearing antioxidant properties, we, here, report on the synthesis, characterization and assessment of the antioxidant activity of new complexes derived from three scorpionate ligands. The interaction between the scorpionate ligands thallium(I) hydrotris(5-methyl-indazolyl)borate (TlTp^4Bo,5Me), thallium(I) hydrotris(4,5-dihydro-2H-benzo[g]indazolyl)borate (TlTp^a) and potassium hydrotris(3-tert-butyl- pyrazolyl)borate (KTp^tBu), and metal(II) chlorides, in dichloromethane at room temperature, produced a new family of complexes having the stoichiometric formula [M(Tp^4Bo,5Me)₂] (M = Cu, 1; Zn, 4; Cd, 7), [M(Tp^a)₂] (M = Cu, 2; Zn, 5; Cd, 8), [Cu(Hpz^tBu)₃Cl₂] (3), [Zn(Tp^tBu)Cl] (6) and [Cd(Bp^tBu)(Hpz^tBu)Cl] (9). The obtained metal complexes were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, proton nuclear magnetic resonance and elemental analysis, highlighting the total and partial hydrolysis of the scorpionate ligand Tp^tBu during the synthesis of the Cu(II) complex 3 and the Cd(II) complex 9, respectively. An assessment of the antioxidant activity of the obtained metal complexes was performed through both enzymatic and non-enzymatic assays against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl- hydrazyl (DPPH^·), 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS^+·), hydroxyl (HO^·), nitric oxide (NO^·), superoxide (O₂⁻) and peroxide (OOH^·) radicals. In particular, the complex [Cu(Tp^a)₂]⋅0.5H₂O (2) exhibited significant antioxidant activity, as good and specific activity against superoxide (O₂^−·), (IC50 values equal to 5.6 ± 0.2 μM) and might be identified as auspicious SOD-mimics (SOD = superoxide dismutase).     

Bis(pyrazolylethyl)thioether ligation to zinc and cadmium: structural characterization of [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]ZnCl2, [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]CdI2 and [S(CH2CH2pzMe2)2]Cd(NO3)2

Structural characterization of [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]ZnCl₂ by X-ray diffraction demonstrates that the potentially tridentate [NNS] donor ligand S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂ does not coordinate via sulfur, but only binds through the pyrazolyl groups. Furthermore, the ligand does not chelate, but preferentially bridges two zinc centers, thereby resulting in a polymeric, helical, structure. In contrast to the zinc system, the thioether functionality does bind to cadmium in related derivatives, [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]CdI₂ and [S(CH₂CH₂pz^Me₂)₂]Cd(NO₃)₂.     

Rare‐Earth‐Metal Methyl,Amide, and Imide Complexes Supported by a Superbulky Scorpionate Ligand

The reaction of monomeric [(Tp^tBu,Me)LuMe₂] (Tp^tBu,Me=tris(3‐Me‐5‐tBu‐pyrazolyl)borate) with primary aliphatic amines H₂NR (R=tBu, Ad=adamantyl) led to lutetium methyl primary amide complexes [(Tp^tBu,Me)LuMe(NHR)], the solid‐state structures of which were determined by XRD analyses. The mixed methyl/tetramethylaluminate compounds [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe({μ₂‐Me}AlMe₃)] (Ln=Y, Ho) reacted selectively and in high yield with H₂NR, according to methane elimination, to afford heterobimetallic complexes: [(Tp^tBu,Me)Ln({μ₂‐Me}AlMe₂)(μ₂‐NR)] (Ln=Y, Ho). X‐ray structure analyses revealed that the monomeric alkylaluminum‐supported imide complexes were isostructural, featuring bridging methyl and imido ligands. Deeper insight into the fluxional behavior in solution was gained by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic studies at variable temperatures and ¹H–⁸⁹Y HSQC NMR spectroscopy. Treatment of [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe(AlMe₄)] with H₂NtBu gave dimethyl compounds [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe₂] as minor side products for the mid‐sized metals yttrium and holmium and in high yield for the smaller lutetium. Preparative‐scale amounts of complexes [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe₂] (Ln=Y, Ho, Lu) were made accessible through aluminate cleavage of [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe(AlMe₄)] with N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda). The solid‐state structures of [(Tp^tBu,Me)HoMe(AlMe₄)] and [(Tp^tBu,Me)HoMe₂] were analyzed by XRD.     

High-spin iron(III) complexes: structural,spectroscopic, and photochemical studies

Reaction of FeCl₃ with one equivalent of acac (acac = pentane-2,4-dionate) and KTp^Me2 (Tp^Me2 = hydrotris(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-yl)borate) yielded Tp^Me2Fe(acac)Cl (3), which upon reaction with methanolic solution of sodium azide resulted in the formation of a six coordinate compound Tp^Me2Fe(acac)N₃ (4) with a single azide. When the reaction of FeCl₃ and KTp^Me2 was performed with two equivalents of sodium azide and one equivalent of 3,5-dimethylpyrazole (Pz^Me2H), a six coordinate cis azide compound [Tp^Me2Fe(Pz^Me2H)(N₃)₂] (5) was obtained. These compounds were characterized by spectroscopic methods and single crystal X-ray crystallography. Electrochemical studies of 5 show that it can be irreversibly reduced at relatively lower potential than 4. The photolysis of 5 was performed at 77 K at different wavelengths (480, 419, and 330 nm) showing that 5 was photoreduced to a high-spin Fe(II) species instead of photooxidized to Fe(V).     

(Acetato‐κO)[tris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN2)hydroborato]zinc(II)

The title complex, [Zn(C₁₅H₂₂BN₆)(C₂H₃O₂)] or (Tp^Me,Me)Zn(OAc), contains a tripodal tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborate ligand, a monodentate acetate ligand and a Zn^II centre in a distorted tetrahedral coordination environment capped on one triangular face by a secondary Zn...O interaction with the second O atom of the acetate ligand. The four‐coordination of Zn^II and the essentially monodentate character of the acetate ligand are due to the high steric demands of the ligand set, which prevent chelate formation and five‐coordination and lead to relatively long Zn—O and Zn—N bonds compared with related complexes of Zn^II and other metals.     

Dynamic Effects Dictate the Mechanism and Selectivity of Dehydration–Rearrangement Reactions of Protonated Alcohols [Me2(R)CCH(OH2)Me]+ (R=Me,Et, iPr) in the Gas Phase

The gas‐phase dehydration–rearrangement (DR) reactions of protonated alcohols [Me₂(R)CCH(OH₂)Me]⁺ [R=Me ( ME ), Et ( ET ), and iPr ( I‐PR )] were studied by using static approaches (intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC), Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus theory) and dynamics (quasiclassical trajectory) simulations at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level of theory. The concerted mechanism involves simultaneous water dissociation and alkyl migration, whereas in the stepwise reaction pathway the dehydration step leads to a secondary carbocation intermediate followed by alkyl migration. Internal rotation (IR) can change the relative position of the migrating alkyl group and the leaving group (water), so distinct products may be obtained: [Me(R)CCH(Me)Me ??? OH₂]⁺ and [Me(Me)CCH(R)Me ??? OH₂]⁺. The static approach predicts that these reactions are concerted, with the selectivity towards these different products determined by the proportion of the conformers of the initial protonated alcohols. These selectivities are explained by the DR processes being much faster than IR. These results are in direct contradiction with the dynamics simulations, which indicate a predominantly stepwise mechanism and selectivities that depend on the alkyl groups and dynamics effects. Indeed, despite the lifetimes of the secondary carbocations being short (<0.5 ps), IR can take place and thus provide a rich selectivity. These different selectivities, particularly for ET and I‐PR , are amenable to experimental observation and provide evidence for the minor role played by potential‐energy surface and the relevance of the dynamics effects (non‐IRC pathways, IR) in determining the reaction mechanisms and product distribution (selectivity).     

The Photochemistry of (Diene)(hydro)[tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borato]rhodium Complexes,Preliminary Communication

The photochemical rearrangement of [Rh(η⁴-1,5-cod)Tp^Me2](Tp^Me2=hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borato, 1,5-cod=cycloocta-1,5-diene) to the new compound [Rh(η⁴-1,3-cod)Tp^Me2] ( 2 ) is described. The characterization of 2 was carried out using ¹H-, ¹³C-, and ¹⁰³Rh-HMQC-NMR spectroscopy. Photolysis of 2 is a versatile entry point into the organometallic chemistry of the {RhTp^Me2} fragment as it can be used to produce a) hydrido-carbonyl ([Rh(CO)H₂Tp^Me2]), b) hydrido-phenyl-phosphite ([RhH(Ph)(P(OMe)₃)Tp^Me2]), and c) ethoxide-hydrido-phosphite ([RhH(OEt)(P(OMe)₃)Tp^Me2]) complexes.     

Neue Synthesen von Me2SbX (X = Cl,I) und Kristallstrukturen von Me2SbI und [(Me3Si)2CH]2SbCl

Novel Syntheses of Me₂SbX (X = Cl, I) and Crystal Structures of Me₂SbI and [(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂SbCl The crystal structures of Me₂SbI (Me = CH₃) and [(Me₃Si)₂CH]₂SbCl have been determined by X‐ray methods. Both molecules are pyramidal. The Me₂SbI molecules are associated to chains through short intermolecular Sb…I distances (366,7(1) pm) with linear I–Sb…I units (171,87(4)°) and bent Sb–I…Sb bridges (116,83(3)°).     

Reactivity of TpMe2‐Supported Yttrium Alkyl Complexes toward Aromatic N‐Heterocycles: Ring‐Opening or CC Bond Formation Directed by CH Activation

Unusual chemical transformations such as three‐component combination and ring‐opening of N‐heterocycles or formation of a carbon–carbon double bond through multiple C–H activation were observed in the reactions of Tp^Me2‐supported yttrium alkyl complexes with aromatic N‐heterocycles. The scorpionate‐anchored yttrium dialkyl complex [Tp^Me2Y(CH₂Ph)₂(THF)] reacted with 1‐methylimidazole in 1:2 molar ratio to give a rare hexanuclear 24‐membered rare‐earth metallomacrocyclic compound [Tp^Me2Y(μ‐N,C‐Im)(η²‐N,C‐Im)]₆ ( 1 ; Im=1‐methylimidazolyl) through two kinds of C–H activations at the C2‐ and C5‐positions of the imidazole ring. However, [Tp^Me2Y(CH₂Ph)₂(THF)] reacted with two equivalents of 1‐methylbenzimidazole to afford a C–C coupling/ring‐opening/C–C coupling product [Tp^Me2Y{η³‐(N,N,N)‐N(CH₃)C₆H₄NHCH?C(Ph)CN(CH₃)C₆H₄NH}] ( 2 ). Further investigations indicated that [Tp^Me2Y(CH₂Ph)₂(THF)] reacted with benzothiazole in 1:1 or 1:2 molar ratio to produce a C–C coupling/ring‐opening product {(Tp^Me2)Y[μ‐η²:η¹‐SC₆H₄N(CH?CHPh)](THF)}₂ ( 3 ). Moreover, the mixed Tp^Me2/Cp yttrium monoalkyl complex [(Tp^Me2)CpYCH₂Ph(THF)] reacted with two equivalents of 1‐methylimidazole in THF at room temperature to afford a trinuclear yttrium complex [Tp^Me2CpY(μ‐N,C‐Im)]₃ ( 5 ), whereas when the above reaction was carried out at 55 °C for two days, two structurally characterized metal complexes [Tp^Me2Y(Im‐Tp^Me2)] ( 7 ; Im‐Tp^Me2=1‐methyl‐imidazolyl‐Tp^Me2) and [Cp₃Y(HIm)] ( 8 ; HIm=1‐methylimidazole) were obtained in 26 and 17 % isolated yields, respectively, accompanied by some unidentified materials. The formation of 7 reveals an uncommon example of construction of a C?C bond through multiple C–H activations.     

Coinage metal complexes of tris(pyrazolyl)methanide [C(3,5-Me2pz)3]-: kappa3-coordination vs. backbone functionalisation

Tris(pyrazolyl)methanides, [C(3,5-R2pz)3]-, contain an unassociated tetrahedral carbanionic centre in the bridgehead position. In addition to nitrogen donor centres for transition metal coordination, an accessible reactive site for further manipulations is available in the backbone of the ligand. The coordination variability of the ambidental C-/N ligand [C(3,5-Me2pz)3]- was elucidated by investigating its coinage metal complexes. Two principle coordination modes were found for complexes of general formula [LMPR3] (with M = Cu(I), Ag(I), Au(I); L =[C(3,5-Me2pz)3]-; R = Ph, OMe). While for Cu(I) (2,3) and Ag(I) (4) complexes the anionic ligand acts as a face-capping, six electron N3-donor, gold(I) (5) is coordinated by the bridging carbanion yielding a two coordinate Au(I) complex comprising a covalent Au-C bond. The complexes featuring the kappa3-coordinated N3-donor ligand were investigated by 31P CP (MAS) NMR in the solid state.     

Syntheses and structures of lanthanide(III) complexes with some bis(pyrazolyl)borate and tris(pyrazolyl)borate podand ligands

Two new poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands have been prepared: potassium tris[3-{(4-^tbutyl)-pyrid-2-yl}-pyrazol-1-yl]hydroborate (KTp^BuPy) which has three bidentate arms and is therefore hexadentate; and potassium bis[3-(2-pyridyl)-5-(methoxymethyl)pyrazol-1-yl]-dihydroborate (KBp^(COC)Py) which has two bidentate arms and is therefore tetradentate. The crystal structures of their lanthanide complexes [La(Tp^BuPy)(NO₃)₂] and [La(Bp^(COC)Py)₂X] (X=nitrate or triflate) have been determined. In [La(Tp^BuPy)(NO₃)₂] the metal ion is ten-coordinate, from the hexadentate N-donor podand ligand and two bidentate nitrates. [La(Bp^(COC)Py)₂(NO₃)] is also ten-coordinate, from two tetradentate ligands and a bidentate nitrate, but in [La(Bp^(COC)Py)₂(CF₃SO₃)] the metal ion is nine-coordinate because the triflate anion is monodentate. Two unexpected new complexes which arose from partial decomposition of the poly(pyrazolyl)borate ligands have also been characterised structurally. In [La(^BuPypzH)₃(O₃SCF₃)₃] the metal ion is nine-coordinate from three bidentate pyrazolyl-pyridine arms (liberated by decomposition of KTp^BuPy) and three triflate anions; there is extensive NH· · · O hydrogen-bonding between the pyrazolyl and triflate ligands. [Nd(Tp^Py)(Bp^Py)][Nd(PypzH)(NO₃)₄] was isolated from the reaction of hexadentate tris[3-(2-pyridyl)-pyrazol-1-yl]hydroborate (Tp^Py) with Nd(NO₃)₃. One of the Tp^Py ligands has lost one bidentate pyrazolyl-pyridine ‘arm’ (PypzH) to leave tetradentate tris[3-(2-pyridyl)-pyrazol-1-yl]dihydroborate (Bp^Py). In this structure, the cation [Nd(Tp^Py)(Bp^Py)]⁺ is ten-coordinate from inter-leaved hexadentate and tetradentate ligands, and the anion [Nd(PypzH)(NO₃)₄]⁻ is also ten-coordinate from the bidentate N-donor ligand PypzH and four bidentate nitrates.     

Catenated Gallium Compounds Supported by a<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Tris</Emphasis>(pyrazolyl)hydroborato Ligand

[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]M (M = K, Tl) reacts with “GaI” to give a series of compounds that feature Ga–Ga bonds, namely [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaI₃, [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]GaGaI₂GaI₂( \textHpz^\textMe₂ {\text{Hpz}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ) and [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga(GaI₂)₂Ga[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ], in addition to the cationic, mononuclear Ga(III) complex {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]₂Ga}⁺. Likewise, [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]M (M = K, Tl) reacts with (HGaCl₂) ₂ and Ga[GaCl₄] to give [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaCl₃, {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]₂Ga}[GaCl₄], and {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]GaGa[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]}[GaCl₄]₂. The adduct [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃ may be obtained via treatment of [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]K with “GaI” followed by addition of B(C₆F₅)₃. Comparison of the deviation from planarity of the GaY₃ ligands in [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaY₃ (Y = Cl, I) and [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga→GaY₃, as evaluated by the sum of the Y–Ga–Y bond angles, Σ(Y–Ga–Y), indicates that the [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga moiety is a marginally better donor than [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga. In contrast, the displacement from planarity for the B(C₆F₅)₃ ligand of [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃ is greater than that of [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃, an observation that is interpreted in terms of interligand steric interactions in the former complex compressing the C–B–C bond angles.     

Atran-analoge Verbindungen III. Atran-analoge Verbindungen des Typs Me2DCH2CH2OSi(Me) (OCH2CH2)2D′ Me (I) und Me2DCH2CH2OSi(Me) (OCH2CH2D′Me2)OCH2CH2D″ Me2 (II) (MeCH3; D,D′, D‴N,P, As)

Atrane-analogous Compounds. III. Atrane-analogous Compounds of the Type Me₂DCH₂CH₂OSi(Me)(OCH₂ CH₂)₂ D′Me (I) and Type Me₂DCH₂CH₂OSi(Me) OCH₂CH₂₂D″Me₂ (II) (Me?CH₃; D, D′, D″?N, P, As) Atrane analogous compounds I and II (Abb. 1) have been prepared by condensation reactions of trifunctional silanes RSiX₃ (X?Cl, OEt, NMe₂) with N-methyldiethanolamine, ß-chloroethanol, ß-dimethylaminoethanol, and ß-dimethylarsanoethanol according to eqn. (1) to (3) and reaction schemes of Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. For compounds of type I weak N→Si adduct bonding is indicated for the MeN-donor of the eight-membered ring by significant shifts of the MeNCH₂ and OCH₂ proton n.m.r. signals. For compounds of type II there is no n.m.r. evidence for D→Si interactions. In spite of equal Lewis acidity of the Si atoms differences in adduct formation are observed for cage, ring, and acyclic podand systems, which can be explained mainly by entropy effects connected to the formation of five-membered rings.     

Zum Reaktionsverhalten der Tris(dialkylthiophosphinyl)phosphane – Die Kristallstruktur von [Ag{O[P(S)Me2]2}2] [AsF6]

Reactivity of Tris(dialkylthiophosphinyl)phosphines – Crystal Structure of [Ag{O[P(S)Me₂]₂}₂][AsF₆] In contrast to tris(dialkylphosphoryl)phosphines the reaction of tris(dimethylthiophosphinyl)phosphine with transition metal hexafluoroarsenates of the type [M(SO₂)_m [AsF₆]_n (M = Ag, m = 0, n = 1; M = Fe, Cd, m = n = 2) forms no molecular 2 : 1-complexes but polymeric products. The silver polymer is transformed into [Ag{O[P(S)Me₂]₂}₂][AsF₆], which is also formed by the reaction of Ag[AsF₆] with O[P(S)Me₂]₂. It crystallizes in the space group P1 with a = 862.5(2), b = 1 241.4(2), c = 1 254.0(3)pm, α = 80.34(1), β = 101.99(6), γ= 73.75(1)° (at 20°C) and Z = 2. The central silver atom is surrounded by four sulphur atoms in a slighly distorted tetrahedron. The average (Ag? S) and (P? S) bond lengthes are 259.4(2) pm and 194.9(2)pm, respectively.