The K-admissibility of SL(2, 5)

Let K be a field and let G be a finite group. G is K-admissible if there exists a Galois extension L of K with G=Gal(L/K) such that L is a maximal subfield of a central K-division algebra. We characterize those number fields K such that H is K-admissible where H is any subgroup of SL(2, 5) which contains a S ₂-group. The method also yields refinements and alternate proofs of some known results including the fact that A ₅ is K-admissible for every number field K.Dedicated to Professor Jacques Tits on the occasion of his sixtieth birthdayThe first author was partly supported by NSF fellowship DMS-8601130; the second author was partly supported by NSF grant DMS-8806371.     

Admissibility and field relations

Let K be a number field. A finite group G is called K-admissible if there exists a G-crossed product K-division algebra. K-admissibility has a necessary condition called K-preadmissibility that is known to be sufficient in many cases. It is a 20-year-old open problem to determine whether two number fields K and L with different degrees over ℚ can have the same admissible groups. We construct infinitely many pairs of number fields (K,L) such that K is a proper subfield of L, and K and L have the same preadmissible groups. This provides evidence for a negative answer to the problem. In particular, it follows from the construction that K and L have the same odd order admissible groups.     

On equivalence of number fields

LetK be a field,G a finite group.G is calledK-admissible iff there exists a finite dimensionalK-central division algebraD which is a crossed product forG. Now letK andL be two finite extensions of the rationalsQ such that for every finite groupG, G isK-admissible if and only ifG isL-admissible. ThenK andL have the same degree and the same normal closure overQ. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Characterisations of A p+2 and L 2(2 q )

Let G be a transitive group of degree p+2 with p|G| where p ≧ 5 is a prime number, then (i) G is isomorphic to S _p+2 or A _p+2, if G has an element of order 4, (ii) G is isomorphic to L ₂(2 ^q ) or P Γ L ₂ (2 ^q ), if 2 ^q − 1=p is a Mersenne prime and G has no element of order 4.     

Q-admissibility of certain nonsolvable groups

A finite groupG is calledQ-admissible if there exists a finite dimensional central division algebra overQ, containing a maximal subfield which is a Galois extension ofQ with Galois group isomorphic toG. It is proved thatS ₅ ⁻ , one of the two nontrivial central extensions ofS ₅ byZ/2Z, isQ-admissible. As a consequence of that result and previous results of Sonn and Stern, every finite Sylow-metacyclic group, havingA ₅ as a composition factor, isQ-admissible. This paper is part of a M.Sc. thesis written at the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, under the supervision of Professor J. Sonn, whom the author wishes to thank for his valuable guidance.     

On Tate-Shafarevich groups over galois extensions

LetA be an abelian variety defined over a number fieldK. LetL be a finite Galois extension ofK with Galois groupG and let III(A/K) and III(A/L) denote, respectively, the Tate-Shafarevich groups ofA overK and ofA overL. Assuming these groups are finite, we compute [III(A/L) ^G ]/[III(A/K)] and [III(A/K)]/[N(III(A/L))], where [X] is the order of a finite abelian groupX. Especially, whenL is a quadratic extension ofK, we derive a simple formula relating [III(A/L)], [III(A/K)], and [III(A ^x/K)] whereA x is the twist ofA by the non-trivial characterχ ofG.     

Homomorphisms between the chevalley groups over any fields of characteristic zero

Given an irreducible root system ∑, let G(F,L) denote the Cheval- ley group over a field F corresponding to a lattice L between the root lattice and the weight lattice of ∑,. We will determine all nontnvial homomorphisms from G(k,L ₁) to G(K,L ₂when k and K are any fields of characteristic zero, and we will verify that any nontrivial homomorphism from G(k,L ₁) to G(K,L ₂are induced by a field homomorphism from k to K by multiplying an automorphism of G(K,L ₂.     

On galois groups and their maximal 2-subgroups

LetG be a finite group of even order, having a central element of order 2 which we denote by −1. IfG is a 2-group, letG be a maximal subgroup ofG containing −1, otherwise letG be a 2-Sylow subgroup ofG. LetH=G/{±1} andH=G/{±1}. Suppose there exists a regular extensionL ₁ of ℚ(T) with Galois groupG. LetL be the subfield ofL ₁ fixed byH. We make the hypothesis thatL ₁ admits a quadratic extensionL ₂ which is Galois overL of Galois groupG. IfG is not a 2-group we show thatL ₁ then admits a quadratic extension which is Galois over ℚ(T) of Galois groupG and which can be given explicitly in terms ofL ₂. IfG is a 2-group, we show that there exists an element α ε ℚ(T) such thatL ₁ admits a quadratic extension which is Galois over ℚ(T) of Galois groupG if and only if the cyclic algebra (L/ℚ(T).a) splits. As an application of these results we explicitly construct several 2-groups as Galois groups of regular extensions of ℚ(T).     

Normal integral bases in quadratic and cyclic cubic extensions of quadratic fields

Let K be a number field and let G be a finite abelian group. We call K a Hilbert-Speiser field of type G if, and only if, every tamely ramified normal extension L/K with Galois group isomorphic to G has a normal integral basis. Now let C₂ and C₃ denote the cyclic groups of order 2 and 3, respectively. Firstly, we show that among all imaginary quadratic fields, there are exactly three Hilbert-Speiser fields of type $C_{2}: \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt {m})$, where $m \in \{-1, -3, -7\}$. Secondly, we give some necessary and sufficient conditions for a real quadratic field $K = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt {m})$ to be a Hilbert-Speiser field of type C₂. These conditions are in terms of the congruence class of m modulo 4 or 8, the fundamental unit of K, and the class number of K. Finally, we show that among all quadratic number fields, there are exactly eight Hilbert-Speiser fields of type $C_{3}: \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt {m})$, where $m \in \{-11,-3, -2, 2, 5, 17, 41, 89\}$.Received: 2 April 2002     

Module Correspondences for Twisted Group Algebras

Abstract

Let G and A be finite groups such that (|G|, |A|) = 1. Let K be an algebraically closed field with Char K = 0. Denote by K ^α G the twisted group algebra of G over K with factor set α. In this paper we prove that if A acts homogeneously on K ^α G, then there exists an action of A on G, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of A-invariant irreducible K ^α G-modules and the set of irreducible K ^α C _G (A)-modules.     

A valuation criterion for normal basis generators in local fields of characteristic p

Let K be a complete local field of characteristic p with perfect residue field, and let L/K be a finite, totally ramified, Galois p-extension with G = Gal(L/K). Let v _L be the normalized valuation with ${v_L(L^{\times})=\mathbb{Z} }Let K be a complete local field of characteristic p with perfect residue field, and let L/K be a finite, totally ramified, Galois p-extension with G = Gal(L/K). Let v _L be the normalized valuation with v_L(L^×)=\mathbbZ {v_L(L^{\times})=\mathbb{Z} }. Let p_L ? L{\pi_L\in L} be a prime element, and let p′ (x) be the derivative of the minimal polynomial for π _L over K. We show that any element r ? L{\rho\in L} with v_L(r) o -v_L(p￠(p_L))-1 mod [L:K]{v_L(\rho)\equiv -v_L(p'(\pi_L))-1\bmod[L:K]} generates a normal basis: K[G]ρ = L. This criterion is tight: Given any integer i with i\not o -v_L(p￠(p_L))-1 mod [L:K]{i\not\equiv -v_L(p'(\pi_L))-1\bmod[L:K]}, there is a r_i ? L{\rho_i\in L} with v _L (ρ _i ) = i such that K[G]r_i\subsetneq L{K[G]\rho_i\subsetneq L}.     

Galois number fields with small root discriminant

We pose the problem of identifying the set K(G,Ω) of Galois number fields with given Galois group G and root discriminant less than the Serre constant Ω≈44.7632. We definitively treat the cases G=A₄, A₅, A₆ and S₄, S₅, S₆, finding exactly 59, 78, 5 and 527, 192, 13 fields, respectively. We present other fields with Galois group SL₃(2), A₇, S₇, PGL₂(7), SL₂(8), ΣL₂(8), PGL₂(9), PΓL₂(9), PSL₂(11), and , and root discriminant less than Ω. We conjecture that for all but finitely many groups G, the set K(G,Ω) is empty.     

On finite groups whose every proper normal subgroup is a union of a given number of conjugacy classes

Let G be a finite group andA be a normal subgroup ofG. We denote by ncc(A) the number ofG-conjugacy classes ofA andA is calledn-decomposable, if ncc(A)= n. SetK _G = {ncc(A)|A ⊲ G}. LetX be a non-empty subset of positive integers. A groupG is calledX-decomposable, ifK _G =X. Ashrafi and his co-authors [1-5] have characterized theX-decomposable non-perfect finite groups forX = {1, n} andn ≤ 10. In this paper, we continue this problem and investigate the structure ofX-decomposable non-perfect finite groups, forX = {1, 2, 3}. We prove that such a group is isomorphic to Z₆, D₈, Q₈, S₄, SmallGroup(20, 3), SmallGroup(24, 3), where SmallGroup(m, n) denotes the mth group of ordern in the small group library of GAP [11].     

Geometry of kinematicK-loops

AK-loop is called kinematic, if a further condition (K7) is valid. Such a loop (L, ⊕) can be provided in a natural way with a left and right structureL andG such that (L,L) and (L,G) become incidence (linear) spaces. For (L,L) andt∈L, each left translationt ⁺:L→L;x→b⊕x is a collineation and (L,G) can be turned in an incidence space with parallelism (L,G, ‖). Examples of kinematicK-loops are given for which the corresponding automorphisms δ_a,b are either the identity or fixed point free.     

List Point Arboricity of Dense Graphs

Let G be a simple graph. The point arboricity ρ(G) of G is defined as the minimum number of subsets in a partition of the point set of G so that each subset induces an acyclic subgraph. The list point arboricity ρ _l (G) is the minimum k so that there is an acyclic L-coloring for any list assignment L of G which |L(v)| ≥ k. So ρ(G) ≤ ρ _l (G) for any graph G. Xue and Wu proved that the list point arboricity of bipartite graphs can be arbitrarily large. As an analogue to the well-known theorem of Ohba for list chromatic number, we obtain ρ _l (G + K _n ) = ρ(G + K _n ) for any fixed graph G when n is sufficiently large. As a consequence, if ρ(G) is close enough to half of the number of vertices in G, then ρ _l (G) = ρ(G). Particularly, we determine that , where K _2(n) is the complete n-partite graph with each partite set containing exactly two vertices. We also conjecture that for a graph G with n vertices, if then ρ _l (G) = ρ(G). Research supported by NSFC (No.10601044) and XJEDU2006S05.     

Bounds on smooth matrix coefficients on L 2-spaces

Let G be a semisimple Lie group with a finite number of connected components and a finite center. Let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Let X be a smooth G-space equipped with a G-invariant measure. In this paper, we give upper bounds for K-finite and ${\mathfrak k}Let G be a semisimple Lie group with a finite number of connected components and a finite center. Let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Let X be a smooth G-space equipped with a G-invariant measure. In this paper, we give upper bounds for K-finite and \mathfrak k{\mathfrak k}-smooth matrix coefficients of the regular representation L ²(X) under an assumption about supp(L²(X)) ?[^(G)]_K{{\rm supp}(L^2(X)) \cap \hat G_K}. Furthermore, we show that this bound holds for unitary representations that are weakly contained in L ²(X). Our result generalizes a result of Cowling–Haagerup–Howe (J Reine Angew Math 387:97–110, 1988). As an example, we discuss the matrix coefficients of the O(p, q) representation L²(\mathbbR^p+q){L^2(\mathbb{R}^{p+q})}.     

Discreteness criterion for subgroups of products of SL(2)

Let G be a finite product of SL(2, K _i )’s for local fields K _i of characteristic zero. We present a discreteness criterion for nonsolvable subgroups of G containing an irreducible lattice of a maximal unipotent subgroup of G. In particular, such a subgroup has to be arithmetic. This extends a previous result of A. Selberg when G is a product of SL₂( \mathbbR \mathbb{R} )’s.     

Upper Bounds for the Laplacian Graph Eigenvalues

We first apply non-negative matrix theory to the matrix K = D A, where D and A are the degree-diagonal and adjacency matrices of a graph G, respectively, to establish a relation on the largest Laplacian eigenvalue λ1 (G) of G and the spectral radius p(K) of K. And then by using this relation we present two upper bounds for λ1(G) and determine the extremal graphs which achieve the upper bounds.     

Elementary Bialgebra Properties of Group Rings and Enveloping Rings: An Introduction to Hopf Algebras

This is a slight extension of an expository paper I wrote a while ago as a supplement to my joint work with Declan Quinn on Burnside's theorem for Hopf algebras. It was never published, but may still be of interest to students and beginning researchers.

Let K be a field, and let A be an algebra over K. Then the tensor product A ? A = A ? _K A is also a K-algebra, and it is quite possible that there exists an algebra homomorphism Δ: A → A ? A. Such a map Δ is called a comultiplication, and the seemingly innocuous assumption on its existence provides A with a good deal of additional structure. For example, using Δ, one can define a tensor product on the collection of A-modules, and when A and Δ satisfy some rather mild axioms, then A is called a bialgebra. Classical examples of bialgebras include group rings K[G] and Lie algebra enveloping rings U(L). Indeed, most of this paper is devoted to a relatively self-contained study of some elementary bialgebra properties of these examples. Furthermore, Δ determines a convolution product on Hom _K (A, A), and this leads quite naturally to the definition of a Hopf algebra.     

Alternating groups and flag‐transitive 2‐(v,k, 4) symmetric designs

In this article, we study the classification of flag‐transitive, point‐primitive 2‐ (v, k, 4) symmetric designs. We prove that if the socle of the automorphism group G of a flag‐transitive, point‐primitive nontrivial 2‐ (v, k, 4) symmetric design ?? is an alternating group A_n for n≥5, then (v, k) = (15, 8) and ?? is one of the following: (i) The points of ?? are those of the projective space PG(3, 2) and the blocks are the complements of the planes of PG(3, 2), G = A₇ or A₈, and the stabilizer G_x of a point x of ?? is L₃(2) or AGL₃(2), respectively. (ii) The points of ?? are the edges of the complete graph K₆ and the blocks are the complete bipartite subgraphs K_{2, 4} of K₆, G = A₆ or S₆, and G_x = S₄ or S₄ × Z₂, respectively. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 19:475‐483, 2011