Homo‐ and Heterodinuclear Ir and Rh Imine‐functionalized Protic NHC Complexes: Synthetic,Structural Studies,and Tautomerization/Metallotropism Insights

The influence of the potentially chelating imino group of imine‐functionalized Ir and Rh imidazole complexes on the formation of functionalized protic N‐heterocyclic carbene (pNHC) complexes by tautomerization/metallotropism sequences was investigated. Chloride abstraction in [Ir(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 a ) (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) with TlPF₆ gave [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^?). Plausible mechanisms for the tautomerization of complex 1 a to 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? involving C2?H bond activation either in 1 a or in [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?) were postulated. Addition of PR₃ to complex 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? afforded the eighteen‐valence‐electron complexes [Ir(cod)(PR₃){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Ph) and 7 b ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Me)). In contrast to Ir, chloride abstraction from [Rh(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 b ) at room temperature afforded [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) and [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) (minor); the reaction yielded exclusively the latter product in toluene at 110 °C. Double metallation of the azole ring (at both the C2 and the N3 atom) was also achieved: [Ir₂(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 10 ) and the heterodinuclear complex [IrRh(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 12 ) were fully characterized. The structures of complexes 1 b , 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?, 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, [Ir(cod){C₃HN₂(DippN=CMe)(DippN=CH)(Me)‐κ²(N3,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 9 ⁺[PF₆]^?), 10? Et₂O ? toluene, [Ir₂(CO)₄Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 11 ), and 12? 2 THF were determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Phosphine free diamino-diol based palladium catalysts and their application in Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions

Inexpensive air and moisture stable diamino-diol ligands [(2-OH-C₁₀H₆)CH₂(μ-NC₄H₈N)CH₂(C₁₀H₆-2-OH)] (1) and [(5-^tBuC₆H₃-2-OH)CH₂(μ-NC₄H₈N)CH₂(5-^tBuC₆H₃-2-OH)] (2) were synthesized by reacting corresponding alcohols with formaldehyde and piperazine. Treatment of ligands 1 and 2 with Pd(OAc)₂ in 1:1 molar ratio afforded neutral palladium complexes [Pd{(OC₁₀H₆)CH₂(μ-NC₄H₈N)CH₂(C₁₀H₆O)}] (3) and [Pd{(5-^tBuC₆H₃-2-O)CH₂(μ-NC₄H₈N)CH₂(5-^tBuC₆H₃-2-O)}] (4) in good yield. The palladium complexes 3 and 4 are employed in Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions between phenylboronic acid and several aryl chlorides or bromides. They are found to be competent homogeneous catalysts for a variety of substrates to afford the coupled products in good to excellent yields. The crystal structures of compounds 2 and 4 are also reported.     

Exploratory organometal-sulfur chemistry; syntheses and unusual properties of rhenium CH2SR,CHSRR′, and CHSR]+ complexes

The methylidene complex [(η-C₅H₅)Re(NO)(PPh₃)(CH₂)]⁺PF₆^?(I) yields kinetically labile sulfonium salts when treated with CH₃SCH₃, CH₃SCH₂C₆H₅, and (η-C₅H₅)Re(NO)(PPh₃)(CH₂SCH₃) (V);the binuclear adduct formed in the latter case, [(η-C₅H₅)Re(NO)(PPh₃)CH₂]₂S⁺CH₃ (VI), is substantially more stable than the others and undergoes hydride transfer disproportionation to [(η-C₅H₅)Re(NO)(PPh₃)(CHSCH₃)]⁺PF₆^?(VII) and (η-C₅H₅)Re(NO)(PPh₃)(CH₃) (VIII) when heated.     

Ligand‐Centred Reactivity of Bis(picolyl)amine Iridium: Sequential Deprotonation,Oxidation and Oxygenation of a “Non‐Innocent” Ligand

Treatment of [Ir(bpa)(cod)]⁺ complex [ 1 ]⁺ with a strong base (e.g., tBuO^?) led to unexpected double deprotonation to form the anionic [Ir(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? species [ 3 ]^?, via the mono‐deprotonated neutral amido complex [Ir(bpa?H)(cod)] as an isolable intermediate. A certain degree of aromaticity of the obtained metal–chelate ring may explain the favourable double deprotonation. The rhodium analogue [ 4 ]^? was prepared in situ. The new species [M(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? (M=Rh, Ir) are best described as two‐electron reduced analogues of the cationic imine complexes [M^I(cod)(Py‐CH₂‐N?CH‐Py)]⁺. One‐electron oxidation of [ 3 ]^? and [ 4 ]^? produced the ligand radical complexes [ 3 ]^. and [ 4 ]^.. Oxygenation of [ 3 ]^? with O₂ gave the neutral carboxamido complex [Ir(cod)(py‐CH₂‐N‐CO‐py)] via the ligand radical complex [ 3 ]^. as a detectable intermediate.     

Di‐Benzo‐18‐Crown‐6 and its Derivatives as Ligands in the Search for Ion Channels

Based on the previously reported one‐dimensional channel system [(H₂O)?(DB18C6)(μ₂‐H₂O)_2/2][(H₃O)?(DB18C6)(μ₂‐H₂O)_2/2]I₃ ( 2 ), which is realized by stacking of crown ether molecules (DB18C6 = dibenzo‐18‐crown‐6), other synthetic approaches towards ionic channels and their results are presented in this paper. The “cutting out” approach using DB18C6 as scissor, applied on NaI, yields the compound [Na?(DB18C6)I(THF)][Na?(DB18C6)(H₂O)₂]I(THF)₂(CHI₃) ( 1 ), in high yield. It is based on a neutral and a cationic complex of sodium by DB18C6 linked via H‐bonding to give short chain fragments. The anion exchange approach, trying to replace I₃^? by Br₃^? leads to the intercalation of a cation into a DB18C6 chain in [(Me₃NPh)(DB18C6)]Br₃ ( 3 ). A similar reaction as for the synthesis of 2 , but replacing iodide with bromine, yields finally a brominated DB18C6 ligand. In the presence of iron, the compound [(H₅O₂)?(Br₄‐DB18C6)₂][FeBr₄], 4 , is observed, in which a H₅O₂⁺‐cation is encapsuled by two brominated crown ether molecules. The absence of Fe and an excess of Br₂ leads to the complexation of H₃O⁺, and co‐crystallisation of bromine in [(H₃O)?(Br₄‐DB18C6)]Br₃Br₂ ( 5 ).     

Intermediates in associative phosphine substitution reactions of (η5-C5H5)W(CO)2(NO)

The reaction of (η⁵-C₅H₅)W(CO)₂(NO), 6W, with P(CH₃)₃ proceeds rapidly at 25°C to give (η⁵-C₅H₅)W(CO)(NO)[P(CH₃)₃], 7W. The rate of formation of 7W was found to be 4.48 × 10^?2M^?1 [6W] [P(CH₃)₃] at 25.0°c in THF. In neat P(CH₃)₃ at ?23°C, 6W is converted to (η¹-C₅H₅)W(CO)₂(NO)[P(CH₃)₃]₂, 8W. In dilute solution, 8W decomposes to initially give a 2:1 mixture of 6W and 7W. The mixture is then converted to 7W. The reaction of (η⁵-C₅H₅)Mo(CO)(NO), 6Mo, with P(CH₃)₃ is 6.1 times faster than that of the tungsten analog.     

Some ring replacement and nucleophilic substitution reactions of η6-subsituted arene-η5-cylopentadienyliron hexafluorophosphates

A number of nitroarene and aminoarene complexes, including the PF₆^? salts of NO₂C₆H₅FeCp^p+, 0-, m- or p-CH₃(NO₂)C₆H₄FeCp⁺, NH₂C₆H₅FeCp^p+ and 0-, m-, orp-CH₃(NH₂)C₆H₄FeCp^p+, when heated with an excess of P(OC₂H₅)₃ all gave rise to the ring replacement product, CpFe(P(OC₂H₅)₃)₃⁺ PF₆^? (I). Similarly, the thermal reaction of NO₂C₆H₅Fe(CH₃)Cp⁺ PF₆^? or NH₂C₆H₅Fe(CH₃)Cp⁺ PF₆^? with P(OC₂H₅)₃ gave CH₃CpFe(P(OC₂H₅)₃)₃⁺ PF₆^? (VII). With m-CH₃(Cl)C₆H₄-FeCp⁺ PF₆^? (XIV), heating with P(OC₂H₅)₃ also gave rise to I, while the same treatment with P(OC₂H₅)₃ at room temperature in CH₂Cl₂ showed no nucleophilic substitution of the chlorine atom of XIV by P(OC₂H₅)₃. On the other hand, the chlorine atom of a number of chloroarene complexes could be readily displaced at room temperature with various amines acting as nucleophiles. Such nucleophilic substitutions were carried out on ClC₆H₅FeCp⁺ PF₆^? and 0-, m- or p-CH₃(CI)C₆H₄FeCp⁺ PF₆^? with methylamine, ethylenediamine, cyclohexylamine, benzylamine and pyrrolidine to give rise to 20N-substituted aminoarene complexes.     

Über die Kristallstrukturen von CH3PF2H+AsF6− und CH3PF2H+SbF6− und eine einfache Darstellung von CH3PF2

On the Crystal Structures of CH₃PF₂H⁺AsF₆^? and CH₃PF₂H⁺SbF₆^? and a simple Method for Preparation of CH₃PF₂ A simple method for preparation of CH₃PF₂ from CH₃PCl₂ is reported. The phosphonium salts CH₃PF₂H⁺MF₆^? are obtained by the reaction of CH₃PCl₂ with superacidic systems HF/MF₅ (M = As, Sb). CH₃PF₂H⁺SbF₆^? crystallizes in the space group P1 with a = 548.4(4) pm, b = 695.5(8) pm, c = 960.2(9) pm, α = 94.68(5)°, β = 97.19(6)°, γ = 94.41(6)° and Z = 2. CH₃PF₂H⁺SbF₆^? crystallizes in P1 with a = 554.3(3), b = 724.2(4), c = 970.4(5), α = 94.73(4)°, β = 96.14(5)°, γ = 95.30(4)°.     

Alkylation of [Pt2(μ-S)2(PPh3)4] with boronic acid derivatives

The reactivity of the metalloligand [Pt₂(μ-S)₂(PPh₃)₄] with the boron-functionalized alkylating agents BrCH₂(C₆H₄)B(OR)₂ (R = H or C(CH₃)₂) was investigated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) in real time using pressurized sample infusion (PSI). The macroscopic reaction of [Pt₂(μ-S)₂(PPh₃)₄] with one mole equivalent of alkylating agents BrCH₂(C₆H₄)B{OC(CH₃)₂}₂ and BrCH₂(C₆H₄)B(OH)₂ gave the dinuclear monocationic μ-sulfide thiolate complexes [Pt₂(μ-S){μ-SCH₂(C₆H₄)B{OC(CH₃)₂}₂}(PPh₃)₄]⁺ and [Pt₂(μ-S){μ-S⁺CH₂(C₆H₄)B(OH)(O^?)}(PPh₃)₄]. The products were isolated as the [PF₆]^? salt and zwitterion, respectively, and fully characterized by ESI-MS, IR, ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray structure determinations.     

The use of ferrocene in organometallic synthesis: A two-step preparation of cyclopentadienyliron acetonitrile and phosphine cations via photolysis of cyclopentadienyliron tricarbonyl or arene cations

UV photolysis of [CpFe^II(CO)₃]⁺ PF6₆^? (I) or [CpFe^II(η⁶-toluene)]⁺ PF₆^?? (II) in CH₃CN in the presence of 1 mole of a ligand L gives the new air sensitive, red complexes [CpFe^II(NCCH₃)₂L]⁺PF₆^? (III, L = PPh₃; IV; L = CO; VIII, L = cyclohexene; IX, L = dimethylthiophene) and the known air stable complex [CpFe^II(PMe₃)₂(NCMe)]⁺ PF₆^? (V). The last product is also obtained by photolysis in the presence of 2 or 3 moles of PMe₃. In the presence of dppe, the known complex [CpFe^II (dppe)(NCCH₃)]⁺ (XI) is obtained. Complex III reacts with CO under mild conditions to give the known complex [CpFe(NCCH₃)(PPh₃)CO]⁺ PF₆^? (X). UV photolysis of I in CH₃CN in the presence of 1-phenyl-3,4-dimethylphosphole (P) gives [CpFe^IIP₃]⁺ PF₆^? (XII); UV photolysis of II in CH₂Cl₂ in the presence of 3 moles of PMe₃ or I mole of tripod (CH₃C(CH₂Ph₂)₃) provides an easy synthesis of the known complexes [CpFe^II(PMe₃)₃]⁺ PF₆^? (VII) or [CpFe^IIη³-tripod]⁺ PF₆^t- (XIII). Since I and II are easily accessible from ferrocene, these photolytic syntheses provide access to a wide range of piano-stool cyclopentadienyliron(II) cations in a 2-step process from ferrocene.     

A novel PtII–dibenzo‐18‐crown‐6 (DB18C6) complex

The novel Pt^II–dibenzo‐18‐crown‐6 (DB18C6) title complex, μ‐[tetrakis­(thio­cyanato‐S)­platinum(II)]‐N:N′‐bis{[2,5,8,­15,18,21‐hexa­oxa­tri­cyclo­[20.4.0.1^9,14]­hexa­cosa‐1(22),9(14),10,12,23,25‐hexaene‐κ⁶O]­potassium(I)}, [K(C₂₀H₂₄O₆)]₂[Pt(SCN)₄], has been isolated and characterized by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The structure analysis shows that the complex displays a quasi‐one‐dimensional infinite chain of two [K(DB18C6)]⁺ complex cations and a [Pt(SCN)₄]^2? anion, bridged by K⁺?π interactions between adjacent [K(DB18C6)]⁺ units.     

Gemischte Sandwichkomplexe der 4 f‐Elemente: Enantiomerenreine Cyclooctatetraenyl‐Cyclopentadienyl‐Komplexe des Samariums und Lutetiums mit donorfunktionalisierten Cyclopentadienylliganden

Organometallic Compounds of the Lanthanides. 139 Mixed Sandwich Complexes of the 4 f Elements: Enantiomerically Pure Cyclooctatetraenyl Cyclopentadienyl Complexes of Samarium and Lutetium with Donor‐Functionalized Cyclopentadienyl Ligands The reactions of [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}], [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] and [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] with the cyclooctatetraenyl lanthanide chlorides [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln(μ‐Cl)(THF)]₂ (Ln = Sm, Lu) yield the mixed cyclooctatetraenyl cyclopentadienyl lanthanide complexes [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Sm{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}] ( 1 a ), [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 2 a ), Lu ( 2 b )) and [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 3 a ), Lu ( 3 b )). For comparison, the achiral compounds [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 4 a ), Lu ( 4 b )) are synthesized in an analogous manner. ¹H‐, ¹³C‐NMR‐, and mass spectra of all new compounds as well as the X‐ray crystal structures of 3 b and 4 b are discussed.     

Chiral η6‐Arene/N‐Tosylethylenediamine–Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Solution Behavior and Catalytic Activity for Asymmetric Hydrogenation

Aromatic ketones are enantioseletively hydrogenated in alcohols containing [RuX{(S,S)‐Tsdpen}(η⁶‐p‐cymene)] (Tsdpen=TsNCH(C₆H₅)CH(C₆H₅)NH₂; X=TfO, Cl) as precatalysts. The corresponding Ru hydride (X=H) acts as a reducing species. The solution structures and complete spectral assignment of these complexes have been determined using 2D NMR (¹H‐¹H DQF‐COSY, ¹H‐¹³C HMQC, ¹H‐¹⁵N HSQC, and ¹H‐¹⁹F HOESY). Depending on the nature of the solvents and conditions, the precatalysts exist as a covalently bound complex, tight ion pair of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, solvent‐separated ion pair, or discrete free ions. Solvent effects on the NH₂ chemical shifts of the Ru complexes and the hydrodynamic radius and volume of the Ru⁺ and TfO^? ions elucidate the process of precatalyst activation for hydrogenation. Most notably, the Ru triflate possessing a high ionizability, substantiated by cyclic voltammetry, exists in alcoholic solvents largely as a solvent‐separated ion pair and/or free ions. Accordingly, its diffusion‐derived data in CD₃OD reflect the independent motion of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and TfO^?. In CDCl₃, the complex largely retains the covalent structure showing similar diffusion data for the cation and anion. The Ru triflate and chloride show similar but distinct solution behavior in various solvents. Conductivity measurements and catalytic behavior demonstrate that both complexes ionize in CH₃OH to generate a common [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, although the extent is significantly greater for X=TfO^?. The activation of [RuX(Tsdpen)(cymene)] during catalytic hydrogenation in alcoholic solvent occurs by simple ionization to generate [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)]. The catalytic activity is thus significantly influenced by the reaction conditions.     

2J(P,C) and 3J(P,C) Coupling Constants in Some New Phosphoramidates. Crystal Structures of CF3C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 and 4‐NO2‐C6H4N(H)P(O)[4‐CH3‐NC5H9]2

Some new phosphoramidates were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of CF₃C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH₃)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂ ( 1 ) and 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄N(H)P(O)[4‐CH₃‐NC₅H₉]₂ ( 6 ) were confirmed by X‐ray single crystal determination. Compound 1 forms a centrosymmetric dimer and compound 6 forms a polymeric zigzag chain, both via ‐N‐H…O=P‐ intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Also, weak C‐H…F and C‐H…O hydrogen bonds were observed in compounds 1 and 6 , respectively. ¹³C NMR spectra were used for study of ²J(P,C) and ³J(P,C) coupling constants that were showed in the molecules containing N(C₂H₅)₂ and N(C₂H₅)(CH₂C₆H₅) moieties, ²J(P,C)>³J(P,C). A contrast result was obtained for the compounds involving a five‐membered ring aliphatic amine group, NC₄H₈. ²J(P,C) for N(C₂H₅)₂ moiety and in NC₄H₈ are nearly the same, but ³J(P, C) values are larger than those in molecules with a pyrrolidinyl ring. This comparison was done for compounds with six and seven‐membered ring amine groups. In compounds with formula XP(O)[N(CH₂R)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂, ²J(P,CH₂)_benzylic>²J(P,CH₂)_aliphatic, in an agreement with our previous study.     

Regioselective Sequential Additions of Nucleophiles and Electrophiles to Perfluoroalkylfullerenes: Which Cage C Atoms Are the Most Reactive and Why?

The sequential addition of CN^? or CH₃^? and electrophiles to three perfluoroalkylfullerenes (PFAFs), C_s‐C₇₀(CF₃)₈, C₁‐C₇₀(CF₃)₁₀, and C_s‐p‐C₆₀(CF₃)₂, was carried out to determine the most reactive individual fullerene C atoms (as opposed to the most reactive C?C bonds, which has previously been studied). Each PFAF reacted with CH₃^? or CN^? to generate metastable PFAF(CN)^? or PFAF(CH₃)₂^2? species with high regioselectivity (i.e., one or two predominant isomers). They were treated with electrophiles E⁺ to generate PFAF(CN)(E) or PFAF(CH₃)₂(E)₂ derivatives, also with high regioselectivity (E⁺=CN⁺, CH₃⁺, or H⁺). All of the predominant products, characterized by mass spectrometry and ¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy, are new compounds. Some could be purified by HPLC to give single isomers. Two of them, C₇₀(CF₃)₈(CN)₂ and C₇₀(CF₃)₁₀(CH₃)₂(CN)₂, were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. DFT calculations were used to propose whether a particular reaction is under kinetic or thermodynamic control.     

Heterotrimetallic Coordination Polymers: {CuIILnIIIFeIII} Chains and {NiIILnIIIFeIII} Layers: Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Magnetic Properties

The use of the [Fe^III(AA)(CN)₄]^? complex anion as metalloligand towards the preformed [Cu^II(valpn)Ln^III]³⁺ or [Ni^II(valpn)Ln^III]³⁺ heterometallic complex cations (AA=2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) and 1,10‐phenathroline (phen); H₂valpn=1,3‐propanediyl‐bis(2‐iminomethylene‐6‐methoxyphenol)) allowed the preparation of two families of heterotrimetallic complexes: three isostructural 1D coordination polymers of general formula {[Cu^II(valpn)Ln^III(H₂O)₃(μ‐NC)₂Fe^III(phen)(CN)₂ {(μ‐NC)Fe^III(phen)(CN)₃}]NO₃ ? 7 H₂O}_n (Ln=Gd ( 1 ), Tb ( 2 ), and Dy ( 3 )) and the trinuclear complex [Cu^II(valpn)La^III(OH₂)₃(O₂NO)(μ‐NC)Fe^III(phen)(CN)₃] ? NO₃ ? H₂O ? CH₃CN ( 4 ) were obtained with the [Cu^II(valpn)Ln^III]³⁺ assembling unit, whereas three isostructural heterotrimetallic 2D networks, {[Ni^II(valpn)Ln^III(ONO₂)₂(H₂O)(μ‐NC)₃Fe^III(bipy)(CN)] ? 2 H₂O ? 2 CH₃CN}_n (Ln=Gd ( 5 ), Tb ( 6 ), and Dy ( 7 )) resulted with the related [Ni^II(valpn)Ln^III]³⁺ precursor. The crystal structure of compound 4 consists of discrete heterotrimetallic complex cations, [Cu^II(valpn)La^III(OH₂)₃(O₂NO)(μ‐NC)Fe^III(phen)(CN)₃]⁺, nitrate counterions, and non‐coordinate water and acetonitrile molecules. The heteroleptic {Fe^III(bipy)(CN)₄} moiety in 5 – 7 acts as a tris‐monodentate ligand towards three {Ni^II(valpn)Ln^III} binuclear nodes leading to heterotrimetallic 2D networks. The ferromagnetic interaction through the diphenoxo bridge in the Cu^II?Ln^III ( 1 – 3 ) and Ni^II?Ln^III ( 5 – 7 ) units, as well as through the single cyanide bridge between the Fe^III and either Ni^II ( 5 – 7 ) or Cu^II ( 4 ) account for the overall ferromagnetic behavior observed in 1 – 7 . DFT‐type calculations were performed to substantiate the magnetic interactions in 1 , 4 , and 5 . Interestingly, compound 6 exhibits slow relaxation of the magnetization with maxima of the out‐of‐phase ac signals below 4.0 K in the lack of a dc field, the values of the pre‐exponential factor (τ_o) and energy barrier (E_a) through the Arrhenius equation being 2.0×10^?12 s and 29.1 cm^?1, respectively. In the case of 7 , the ferromagnetic interactions through the double phenoxo (Ni^II–Dy^III) and single cyanide (Fe^III–Ni^II) pathways are masked by the depopulation of the Stark levels of the Dy^III ion, this feature most likely accounting for the continuous decrease of χ_M T upon cooling observed for this last compound.     

Ligand‐to‐Ligand Charge‐Transfer Transitions of Platinum(II) Complexes with Arylacetylide Ligands with Different Chain Lengths: Spectroscopic Characterization,Effect of Molecular Conformations,and Density Functional Theory Calculations

The complexes [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1R}]⁺ (n=1: R=alkyl and aryl (Ar); n=1–3: R=phenyl (Ph) or Ph‐N(CH₃)₂‐4; n=1 and 2, R=Ph‐NH₂‐4; tBu₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) and [Pt(Cl₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=tert‐butyl (tBu), Ph, 9,9’‐dibutylfluorene, 9,9’‐dibutyl‐7‐dimethyl‐amine‐fluorene; Cl₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐trichloro‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) were prepared. The effects of substituent(s) on the terpyridine (tpy) and acetylide ligands and chain length of arylacetylide ligands on the absorption and emission spectra were examined. Resonance Raman (RR) spectra of [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=n‐butyl, Ph, and C₆H₄‐OCH₃‐4) obtained in acetonitrile at 298 K reveal that the structural distortion of the C?C bond in the electronic excited state obtained by 502.9 nm excitation is substantially larger than that obtained by 416 nm excitation. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations on [Pt(H₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R= n‐propyl (nPr), 2‐pyridyl (Py)), [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1Ph}]⁺ (n=1–3), and [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺/+H⁺ (n=1–3; H₃tpy=nonsubstituted terpyridine) at two different conformations were performed, namely, with the phenyl rings of the arylacetylide ligands coplanar (“cop”) with and perpendicular (“per”) to the H₃tpy ligand. Combining the experimental data and calculated results, the two lowest energy absorption peak maxima, λ₁ and λ₂, of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl, R=aryl) are attributed to ¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] in the “cop” conformation and mixed ¹[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] transitions in the “per” conformation. The lowest energy absorption peak λ₁ for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐H‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3) shows a redshift with increasing chain length. However, for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C6H4C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3), λ₁ shows a blueshift with increasing chain length n, but shows a redshift after the addition of acid. The emissions of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl) at 524–642 nm measured in dichloromethane at 298 K are assigned to the ³[π(C?CAr)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states and mixed ³[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/³[π(C?C)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states for R=aryl and alkyl groups, respectively. [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1 and 2) are nonemissive, and this is attributed to the small energy gap between the singlet ground state (S₀) and the lowest triplet excited state (T₁).     

Synthesis,Interionic Structure,and Reactivity toward CO and p‐Methylstyrene of Palladacyclic Compounds Bearing α‐Diimine Ligands

Palladacyclic compounds [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] (R = Et, ⁱPr, 2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃; N? N = bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dialkylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes; [X]^? = [BF₄]^? or [PF₆]^?) were synthesized from the dimers [{Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and N? N ligands. Their interionic structure in CD₂Cl₂ was determined by means of ¹⁹F,¹H‐HOESY experiments and compared with that in the solid state derived from X‐ray single‐crystal studies. [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] complexes were found to copolymerize CO and p‐methylstyrene affording syndiotactic or isotactic copolymers when bpy or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dimethylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes were used, respectively. The reactions with CO and p‐methylstyrene of the bpy derivatives were investigated. Two intermediates derived from a single and a double insertion of CO into the Pd? C bonds were isolated and completely characterized in solution.     

General Assembly of Twisted Trigonal‐Prismatic Nonanuclear Silver(I) Clusters

A general class of C₃‐symmetric Ag₉ clusters, [Ag₉S(tBuC₆H₄S)₆(dpph)₃(CF₃SO₃)] ( 1 ), [Ag₉(tBuC₆H₄S)₆(dpph)₃(CF₃SO₃)₂] ? CF₃SO₃ ( 2 ), [Ag₉(tBuC₆H₄S)₆(dpph)₃(NO₃)₂] ? NO₃ ( 3 ), and [Ag₉(tBuC₆H₄S)₇(dpph)₃(Mo₂O₇)_0.5]₂ ? 2 CF₃COO ( 4 ) (dpph=1,6‐bis(diphenylphosphino)hexane), with a twisted trigonal‐prism geometry was isolated by the reaction of polymeric {(HNEt₃)₂[Ag₁₀(tBuC₆H₄S)₁₂]}_n, 1,6‐bis(diphenylphosphino)hexane, and various silver salts under solvothermal conditions. The structures consist of discrete clusters constructed from a girdling Ag₉ twisted trigonal prism with the top and bottom trigonal faces capped by diverse anions (i.e., S^2? and CF₃SO₃^? for compound 1 , 2×CF₃SO₃^? for compound 2 , 2×NO₃^? for compound 3 , and tBuC₆H₄S^? and Mo₂O₇^2? for compound 4 ). This trigonal prism is bisected by another shrunken Ag₃ trigon at its waist position. Interestingly, two inversion‐related Ag₉ trigonal‐prismatic clusters are dimerized by the Mo₂O₇^2? ion in compound 4 . The twist is amplified by the bulkier thiolate, which also introduces high steric‐hindrance for the capping ligand, that is, the longer dpph ligand. Four more silver–sulfur clusters (namely, compounds 5 – 8 ) with their nuclearity ranging from 6–10 were solely characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction to verify the above‐described synergetic effect of mixed ligands in the construction of Ag₉ twisted trigonal prisms. Surprisingly, only cluster 1 emits yellow luminescence at λ=584 nm at room temperature, which may be attributed to a charge transfer from the S 3p orbital to the Ag 5s orbital, or mixed with metal‐centered (MC) d¹⁰→d⁹s¹ transitions. Upon cooling from 300 to 80 K, the emission intensity was enhanced along with a hypsochromic shift. The good linear relationship between the maximum emission intensity and the temperature for compound 1 in the range of 180–300 K indicates that this is a promising molecular luminescent thermometer. Furthermore, cyclic voltammetric studies indicated that the diffusion‐ and surface‐controlled redox processes were determined for compounds 1 and 3 as well as compound 4 , respectively.     

Ion Pairing and Salt Structure in Organic Salts through Diffusion,Overhauser, DFT and X‐ray Methods

Pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) diffusion characteristics for a) the new [brucinium][X] salts 6 a – f [ a : X=BF₄^?; b : X=PF₆^?; c : X=MeSO₃^?, d : X=CF₃SO₃^?; e : X=BArF^?; f : X=PtCl₃(C₂H₄)^?], b) 4‐tert‐butyl‐N‐benzyl analogue, 7 and c) the aryl carbocations (p‐R‐C₆H₄)₂CH 9 a (R=CH₃O) and 9 b (R=(CH₃)₂N), (p‐CH₃O‐C₆H₄)_xCPh_3?x⁺ 10 a – c (x=1–3, respectively) and (p‐R‐C₆H₄)₃C⁺ 11 (R=(CH₃)₂N) and 12 (R=H) all in several different solvents, are reported. The solvent dependence suggests strong ion pairing in CDCl₃, intermediate ion pairing in CD₂Cl₂ and little ion pairing in [D₆]acetone. ¹H, ¹⁹F HOESY NMR spectra (HOESY: heteronuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy) for 6 and 7 reveal a specific approach of the anion with respect to the brucinium cation plus subtle changes, which are related to the anion itself. Further, for carbocations 9 – 12 , (all as BF₄^? salts) based on the NOE results, one finds marked changes in the relative positions of the BF₄^? anion. In these aryl cationic species the anion can be located either a) very close to the carbonium ion carbon b) in an intermediate position or c) proximate to the N or O atom of the p‐substituent and remote from the formally positive C atom. This represents the first example of such a positional dependence of an anion on the structure of the carbocation. DFT calculations support the experimental HOESY results. The solid‐state structures for 6 c and the novel Zeise's salt derivative, [brucinium][PtCl₃(C₂H₄)], 6 f , are reported. Analysis of ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR and other NMR measurements suggest that the η²‐C₂H₄ bonding to the platinum centre in 6 f is very similar to that found in K[PtCl₃(C₂H₄)]. Field dependent T₁ measurements on [brucinium][PtCl₃(C₂H₄)] and K[PtCl₃(C₂H₄)], are reported and suggested to be useful in recognizing aggregation effects.