Isolation and Total Structure Determination of an All‐Alkynyl‐Protected Gold Nanocluster Au144

Total structure determination of a ligand‐protected gold nanocluster, Au₁₄₄, has been successfully carried out. The composition of title nanocluster is Au₁₄₄(C≡CAr)₆₀ ( 1 ; Ar=2‐FC₆H₄‐). The cluster 1 exhibits a quasi‐spherical Russian doll‐like architecture, comprising a Au₅₄ two‐shelled Mackay icosahedron (Au₁₂@Au₄₂), which is further enclosed by a Au₆₀ anti‐Mackay icosahedral shell. The Au₁₁₄ kernel is enwrapped by thirty linear ArC≡C‐Au‐C≡CAr staple motifs. The absorption spectrum of 1 shows two bands at 560 and 620 nm. This spectrum is distinctly different from that of thiolated Au₁₄₄, which was predicted to have an almost identical metal kernel and very similar ligands arrangement in 1 . These facts indicate the molecule‐like behavior of 1 and significant involvement of ligands in the electronic structure of 1 . The cluster 1 is hitherto the largest coinage metal nanocluster with atomically precise molecular structure in the alkynyl family. The work not only addresses the concern of structural information of Au₁₄₄, which had been long‐pursued, but also provides an interesting example showing ligand effects on the optical properties of ligand protected metal nanoclusters.     

Structure Determination of Alkynyl‐Protected Gold Nanocluster Au22(tBuC≡C)18 and Its Thermochromic Luminescence

An alkynyl‐protected gold nanocluster, Au₂₂(^tBuC≡C)₁₈ ( 1 ), has been synthesized and its structure has been determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The molecular structure consists of a Au₁₃ cuboctahedron kernel and three [Au₃(^tBuC≡C)₄] trimeric staples. The cluster 1 has strong luminescence in the solid state with a 15 % quantum yield, and it displays interesting thermochromic luminescence as revealed by temperature‐dependent emission spectra. The enhanced room‐temperature emission is characterized as thermally activated delayed fluorescence.     

Homoleptic Alkynyl‐Protected Gold Nanoclusters: Au44(PhC≡C)28 and Au36(PhC≡C)24

For the first time total structure determination of homoleptic alkynyl‐protected gold nanoclusters is reported. The nanoclusters are synthesized by direct reduction of PhC≡CAu, to give Au₄₄(PhC≡C)₂₈ and Au₃₆(PhC≡C)₂₄. The Au₄₄ and Au₃₆ nanoclusters have fcc‐type Au₃₆ and Au₂₈ kernels, respectively, as well as surrounding PhC≡C‐Au‐C₂(Ph)Au‐C≡CPh dimeric “staples” and simple PhC≡C bridges. The structures of Au₄₄(PhC≡C)₂₈ and Au₃₆(PhC≡C)₂₄ are similar to Au₄₄(SR)₂₈ and Au₃₆(SR)₂₄, but the UV/Vis spectra are different. The protecting ligands influence the electronic structures of nanoclusters significantly. The synthesis of these two alkynyl‐protected gold nanoclusters indicates that a series of gold nanoclusters in the general formula Au_x (RC≡C)_y as counterparts to Au_x (SR)_y can be expected.     

Alkynyl‐Protected Au23 Nanocluster: A 12‐Electron System

A 23‐gold‐atom nanocluster was prepared by NaBH₄‐mediated reduction of a solution of PhC?CAu and Ph₃PAuSbF₆ in CH₂Cl₂. The cluster composition was determined to be [Au₂₃(PhC?C)₉(Ph₃P)₆]²⁺ and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction revealed that the cluster has an unprecedented Au₁₇ kernel protected by three PhC₂‐Au‐C₂(Ph)‐Au‐C₂Ph motifs and six Ph₃P groups. The Au₁₇ core can be viewed as the fusion of two Au₁₀ units sharing a Au₃ triangle. Electronic structure analysis from DFT calculations suggests that the stability of this unusual 12‐electron cluster is a result of the splitting of the superatomic 1D orbitals under D_3h symmetry of the Au₁₇ kernel. The discovery and determination of the structure of the Au₂₃ cluster demonstrates the versatility of the alkynyl ligand in leading to the formation of new cluster compounds.     

The Structure and Optical Properties of the [Au18(SR)14] Nanocluster

Decreasing the core size is one of the best ways to study the evolution from Au^I complexes into Au nanoclusters. Toward this goal, we successfully synthesized the [Au₁₈(SC₆H₁₁)₁₄] nanocluster using the [Au₁₈(SG)₁₄] (SG=L ‐glutathione) nanocluster as the starting material to react with cyclohexylthiol, and determined the X‐ray structure of the cyclohexylthiol‐protected [Au₁₈(C₆H₁₁S)₁₄] nanocluster. The [Au₁₈(SR)₁₄] cluster has a Au₉ bi‐octahedral kernel (or inner core). This Au₉ inner core is built by two octahedral Au₆ cores sharing one triangular face. One transitional gold atom is found in the Au₉ core, which can also be considered as part of the Au₄(SR)₅ staple motif. These findings offer new insight in terms of understanding the evolution from [Au^I(SR)] complexes into Au nanoclusters.     

Basic [Au25(SCH2CH2Py)18]−⋅Na+ Clusters: Synthesis,Layered Crystallographic Arrangement,and Unique Surface Protonation

The synthesis of high‐purity and high‐yield Au₂₅ clusters protected by the basic pyridyl ethanethiol (HSCH₂CH₂Py, 4‐PyET and 2‐PyET) is presented. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction of the [Au₂₅(4‐PyET)₁₈]^??Na⁺ clusters has revealed a structure similar to that known for the phenyl ethanethiolate analogue, but with pyridyl‐N coordination to Na⁺, a more relaxed ligand shell, and a profoundly layered arrangement in the solid state. Because of the pendant Py moiety, the [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters are endowed with unique (de)protonation equilibria, which has been characterized in detail by UV/Vis absorption and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters showed an unexpectedly H⁺‐dependent solubility that is tunable in aqueous and organic solvents. The successful synthesis of the basic Py‐terminated thiolate‐protected Au₂₅ clusters paves the way to realize a new family of metalloid clusters possessing basic properties.     

Basic [Au25(SCH2CH2Py)18]−⋅Na+ Clusters: Synthesis,Layered Crystallographic Arrangement,and Unique Surface Protonation

The synthesis of high‐purity and high‐yield Au₂₅ clusters protected by the basic pyridyl ethanethiol (HSCH₂CH₂Py, 4‐PyET and 2‐PyET) is presented. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction of the [Au₂₅(4‐PyET)₁₈]^??Na⁺ clusters has revealed a structure similar to that known for the phenyl ethanethiolate analogue, but with pyridyl‐N coordination to Na⁺, a more relaxed ligand shell, and a profoundly layered arrangement in the solid state. Because of the pendant Py moiety, the [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters are endowed with unique (de)protonation equilibria, which has been characterized in detail by UV/Vis absorption and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters showed an unexpectedly H⁺‐dependent solubility that is tunable in aqueous and organic solvents. The successful synthesis of the basic Py‐terminated thiolate‐protected Au₂₅ clusters paves the way to realize a new family of metalloid clusters possessing basic properties.     

Aurophilic Interactions in the Self‐Assembly of Gold Nanoclusters into Nanoribbons with Enhanced Luminescence

Aurophilic interactions (Au^I???Au^I) are crucial in directing the supramolecular self‐assembly of many gold(I) compounds; however, this intriguing chemistry has been rarely explored for the self‐assembly of nanoscale building blocks. Herein, we report on studies on aurophilic interactions in the structure‐directed self‐assembly of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles or nanoclusters (NCs, <2 nm) using [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? (SR=thiolate ligand) as a model cluster. The self‐assembly of NCs is initiated by surface‐motif reconstruction of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? from short SR‐[Au^I‐SR]₂ units to long SR‐[Au^I‐SR]_x (x>2) staples accompanied by structure modification of the intrinsic Au₁₃ kernel. Such motif reconstruction increases the content of Au^I species in the protecting shell of Au NCs, providing the structural basis for directed aurophilic interactions, which promote the self‐assembly of Au NCs into well‐defined nanoribbons in solution. More interestingly, the compact structure and effective aurophilic interactions in the nanoribbons significantly enhance the luminescence intensity of Au NCs with an absolute quantum yield of 6.2 % at room temperature.     

Templated Atom‐Precise Galvanic Synthesis and Structure Elucidation of a [Ag24Au(SR)18]− Nanocluster

Synthesis of atom‐precise alloy nanoclusters with uniform composition is challenging when the alloying atoms are similar in size (for example, Ag and Au). A galvanic exchange strategy has been devised to produce a compositionally uniform [Ag₂₄Au(SR)₁₈]^? cluster (SR: thiolate) using a pure [Ag₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? cluster as a template. Conversely, the direct synthesis of Ag₂₄Au cluster leads to a mixture of [Ag_25?xAu_x(SR)₁₈]^?, x=1–8. Mass spectrometry and crystallography of [Ag₂₄Au(SR)₁₈]^? reveal the presence of the Au heteroatom at the Ag₂₅ center, forming Ag₂₄Au. The successful exchange of the central Ag of Ag₂₅ with Au causes perturbations in the Ag₂₅ crystal structure, which are reflected in the absorption, luminescence, and ambient stability of the particle. These properties are compared with those of Ag₂₅ and Ag₂₄Pd clusters with same ligand and structural framework, providing new insights into the modulation of cluster properties with dopants at the single‐atom level.     

A Ligand‐Protected Golden Fullerene: The Dipyridylamido Au328+ Nanocluster

A golden fullerene Au₃₂ cluster has been synthesized with amido and phosphine ligands as the protecting agents. Single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis revealed that this gold nanocluster, [Au₃₂(Ph₃P)₈(dpa)₆] (SbF₆)₂ (Hdpa=2,2′‐dipyridylamine), has a stable pseudo‐I_h Au₃₂⁸⁺ core with S₆ symmetry, which features an Au₁₂@Au₂₀ Keplerate cage co‐protected by Ph₃P and dpa ligands. Quantum‐chemical studies were conducted to elucidate the origin of the special stability of this cluster, and suggest that it is electronically stabilized through metal–ligand interactions.     

Site Preference in Multimetallic Nanoclusters: Incorporation of Alkali Metal Ions or Copper Atoms into the Alkynyl‐Protected Body‐Centered Cubic Cluster [Au7Ag8(C≡CtBu)12]+

The synthesis, structure, substitution chemistry, and optical properties of the gold‐centered cubic monocationic cluster [Au@Ag₈@Au₆(C≡C^tBu)₁₂]⁺ are reported. The metal framework of this cluster can be described as a fragment of a body‐centered cubic (bcc) lattice with the silver and gold atoms occupying the vertices and the body center of the cube, respectively. The incorporation of alkali metal atoms gave rise to [M_nAg_8?nAu₇(C≡C^tBu)₁₂]⁺ clusters (n=1 for M=Na, K, Rb, Cs and n=2 for M=K, Rb), with the alkali metal ion(s) presumably occupying the vertex site(s), whereas the incorporation of copper atoms produced [Cu_nAg₈Au_7?n(C≡C^tBu)₁₂]⁺ clusters (n=1–6), with the Cu atom(s) presumably occupying the capping site(s). The parent cluster exhibited strong emission in the near‐IR region (λ_max=818 nm) with a quantum yield of 2 % upon excitation at λ=482 nm. Its photoluminescence was quenched upon substitution with a Na⁺ ion. DFT calculations confirmed the superatom characteristics of the title compound and the sodium‐substituted derivatives.     

Atomic‐Level Alloying and De‐alloying in Doped Gold Nanoparticles

Atomically precise alloying and de‐alloying processes for the formation of Ag–Au and Cu–Au nanoparticles of 25‐metal‐atom composition (referred to as Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ and Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈, in which R=CH₂CH₂Ph) are reported. The identities of the particles were determined by matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectroscopy (MALDI‐MS). Their structures were probed by fragmentation analysis in MALDI‐MS and comparison with the icosahedral structure of the homogold Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles (an icosahedral Au₁₃ core protected by a shell of Au₁₂(SR)₁₈). The Cu and Ag atoms were found to preferentially occupy the 13‐atom icosahedral sites, instead of the exterior shell. The number of Ag atoms in Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ (x=0–8) was dependent on the molar ratio of Ag^I/Au^III precursors in the synthesis, whereas the number of Cu atoms in Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ (x=0–4) was independent of the molar ratio of Cu^II/Au^III precursors applied. Interestingly, the Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles show a spontaneous de‐alloying process over time, and the initially formed Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles were converted to pure Au₂₅(SR)₁₈. This de‐alloying process was not observed in the case of alloyed Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles. This contrast can be attributed to the stability difference between Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ and Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles. These alloyed nanoparticles are promising candidates for applications such as catalysis.     

Dual Catalysis of Gold Nanoclusters: Photocatalytic Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling by Cooperation of Superatomic Core and Molecularly Modified Staples**

Thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) have attracted significant attention as nano-catalysts, revealing a superatomic core and gold-thiolate staples as distinct structural units. Here, we demonstrate the unprecedented dual catalytic activity of thiolate-protected [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]⁻ nanoclusters, involving both photosensitized ¹O₂ generation by the Au₁₃ superatomic core and catalytic carbon-carbon bond formation facilitated by Au₂(SR)₃ staples. This synergistic combination of two different catalytic units enables efficient cross-dehydrogenative coupling of terminal alkynes and tertiary aliphatic amines to afford propargylamines in high yields of up to 93 %. Mixed-ligand AuNCs bearing both thiolate and alkynyl ligands revealed the intermediacy of the alkynyl-exchanged AuNCs toward both photosensitization and C−C bond-forming catalytic cycles. Density functional theory calculations also supported the intermediacy of the alkynyl-exchanged AuNCs. Thus, the use of ligand-protected metal nanoclusters has enabled the development of an exceptional multifunctional catalyst, wherein distinct nanocluster components facilitate cooperative photo- and chemo-catalysis.     

Giant Emission Enhancement of Solid‐State Gold Nanoclusters by Surface Engineering

Ligand‐induced surface restructuring with heteroatomic doping is used to precisely modify the surface of a prototypical [Au₂₅(SR¹)₁₈]^? cluster ( 1 ) while maintaining its icosahedral Au₁₃ core for the synthesis of a new bimetallic [Au₁₉Cd₃(SR²)₁₈]^? cluster ( 2 ). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies reveal that six bidentate Au₂(SR¹)₃ motifs (L2) attached to the Au₁₃ core of 1 were replaced by three quadridentate Au₂Cd(SR²)₆ motifs (L4) to create a bimetallic cluster 2 . Experimental and theoretical results demonstrate a stronger electronic interaction between the surface motifs (Au₂Cd(SR²)₆) and the Au₁₃ core, attributed to a more compact cluster structure and a larger energy gap of 2 compared to that of 1 . These factors dramatically enhance the photoluminescence quantum efficiency and lifetime of crystal of the cluster 2 . This work provides a new route for the design of a wide range of bimetallic/alloy metal nanoclusters with superior optoelectronic properties and functionality.     

Coherent Vibrational Dynamics of [Au25(SR)18]- Nanoclusters?

Coherent vibrational dynamics can be observed in atomically precise gold nanoclusters using femtosecond time-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy. It can not only reveal the coupling between electrons and vibrations, but also reflect the mechanical and electronic properties of metal nanoclusters, which holds potential applications in biological sensing and mass detection. Here, we investigated the coherent vibrational dynamics of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^- nanoclusters by ultrafast spectroscopy and revealed the origins of these coherent vibrations by analyzing their frequency, phase and probe wavelength distributions. Strong coherent oscillations with frequency of 40 cm^-1 and 80 cm^-1 can be reproduced in the excited state dynamics of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^-, which should originate from acoustic vibrations of the Au₁₃ metal core. Phase analysis on the oscillations indicates that the 80 cm^-1 mode should arise from the frequency modulation of the electronic states while the 40 cm^-1 mode should originate from the amplitude modulation of the dynamic spectrum. Moreover, it is found that the vibration frequencies of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^- obtained in pump-probe measurements are independent of the surface ligands so that they are intrinsic properties of the metal core. These results are of great value to understand the electron-vibration coupling of metal nanoclusters.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation‐Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I‐thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water‐soluble glutathione (GSH)‐coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]^?, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near‐infrared II (NIR‐II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I‐SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I‐SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE‐type phosphorescence to Au⁰‐core‐dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

Structure of the Au23−xAgx(S‐Adm)15 Nanocluster and Its Application for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants

Ligands play an important role in determining the atomic arrangement within the metal nanoclusters. Here, we report a new nanocluster [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] protected by bulky adamantanethiol ligands which was obtained through a one‐pot synthesis. The total structure of [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] comprises an Au_13?xAg_x icosahedral core, three Au₃(SR)₄ units, and one AgS₃ staple motif in contrast to the 15‐atom bipyramidal core previously seen in [Au_23?xAg_x(SR)₁₆]. UV/Vis spectroscopy indicates that the HOMO–LUMO gap of [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] is 1.5 eV. DFT calculations reveal that [Au₁₉Ag₄(S‐Adm)₁₅] is the most stable structure among all structural possibilities. Benefitting from Ag doping, [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] exhibits drastically improved photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) and phenol under visible‐light irradiation compared to Au₂₃ nanoclusters.     

Formation of an Alkynyl‐Protected Ag112 Silver Nanocluster as Promoted by Chloride Released In Situ from CH2Cl2

By directly reducing alkynyl–silver precursors, we successfully obtained a large alkynyl‐protected silver nanocluster, (C₇H₁₇ClN)₃[Ag₁₁₂Cl₆(C≡CAr)₅₁], which is hitherto the largest structurally characterized silver nanocluster in the alkynyl family. The cluster exhibits four concentric core–shell structures (Ag₁₃@Ag₄₂@Ag₄₈@Ag₉), and four types of alkynyl–silver binding modes are observed. Chloride was found to be critical for the stabilization and formation of the silver nanocluster. The release of chloride ions in situ from CH₂Cl₂ solvent has been confirmed by mass spectrometry. This study suggests that the combination of alkynyl and halide ligands will pave a new way for the synthesis of large silver nanoclusters.     

Structure Determination of [Au18(SR)14]

Unravelling the atomic structures of small gold clusters is the key to understanding the origin of metallic bonds and the nucleation of clusters from organometallic precursors. Herein we report the X‐ray crystal structure of a charge‐neutral [Au₁₈(SC₆H₁₁)₁₄] cluster. This structure exhibits an unprecedented bi‐octahedral (or hexagonal close packing) Au₉ kernel protected by staple‐like motifs including one tetramer, one dimer, and three monomers. Until the present, the [Au₁₈(SC₆H₁₁)₁₄] cluster is the smallest crystallographically characterized gold cluster protected by thiolates and provides important insight into the structural evolution with size. Theoretical calculations indicate charge transfer from surface to kernel for the HOMO–LUMO transition.     

Quantum-chemical study of the effect of ligands on the structure and properties of gold clusters

The structures of [Au₄(dpmp)₂X₂]²⁺clusters, where Х =–C≡CH,–СН₃,–SCH₃,–F,–Cl,–Br,–I, dpmp is bis((diphenylphosphino)methyl)(phenyl)phosphine, are calculated at the level of density functional theory with the PBE functional and a modified Dirac–Coulomb–Breit Hamiltonian in an all-electron basis set (Λ). Using the example of [Au₄(dpmp)₂(С≡CС₆Н₅)₂]²⁺, the interatomic distances and bond angles calculated by means of PBE0/LANL2DZ, TPSS/LANL2DZ, TPSSh/LANL2DZ, and PBE/Λ are compared to X-ray crystallography data. It is shown that PBE/Λ yields the most accurate calculation of the geometrical parameters of this cluster. The ligand effect on the electronic stability of a cluster and the stability in reactions of decomposition into different fragments is studied, along with the capability of ligand exchange. Stability is predicted for [Au₄(dpmp)₂F₂]²⁺ and [Au₄(dpmp)₂(SCH₃)₂]²⁺, while [Au₄(dpmp)₂I₂]²⁺ cluster is unstable and its decomposes into two identical fragments is supposed.