Cationic Platinum(II) σ‐SiH Complexes in Carbon Dioxide Hydrosilation

The low‐electron‐count cationic platinum complex [Pt(ItBu’)(ItBu)][BAr^F], 1 , interacts with primary and secondary silanes to form the corresponding σ‐SiH complexes. According to DFT calculations, the most stable coordination mode is the uncommon η¹‐SiH. The reaction of 1 with Et₂SiH₂ leads to the X‐ray structurally characterized 14‐electron Pt^II species [Pt(SiEt₂H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 2 , which is stabilized by an agostic interaction. Complexes 1 , 2 , and the hydride [Pt(H)(ItBu)₂][BAr^F], 3 , catalyze the hydrosilation of CO₂, leading to the exclusive formation of the corresponding silyl formates at room temperature.     

Theoretical Study on the Mechanism of Ni‐Catalyzed Alkyl–Alkyl Suzuki Cross‐Coupling

Ni‐catalyzed cross‐coupling of unactivated secondary alkyl halides with alkylboranes provides an efficient way to construct alkyl–alkyl bonds. The mechanism of this reaction with the Ni/ L1 ( L1 =trans‐N,N′‐dimethyl‐1,2‐cyclohexanediamine) system was examined for the first time by using theoretical calculations. The feasible mechanism was found to involve a Ni^I–Ni^III catalytic cycle with three main steps: transmetalation of [Ni^I( L1 )X] (X=Cl, Br) with 9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9‐BBN)R₁ to produce [Ni^I( L1 )(R₁)], oxidative addition of R₂X with [Ni^I( L1 )(R₁)] to produce [Ni^III( L1 )(R₁)(R₂)X] through a radical pathway, and C? C reductive elimination to generate the product and [Ni^I( L1 )X]. The transmetalation step is rate‐determining for both primary and secondary alkyl bromides. KOiBu decreases the activation barrier of the transmetalation step by forming a potassium alkyl boronate salt with alkyl borane. Tertiary alkyl halides are not reactive because the activation barrier of reductive elimination is too high (+34.7 kcal mol^?1). On the other hand, the cross‐coupling of alkyl chlorides can be catalyzed by Ni/ L2 ( L2 =trans‐N,N′‐dimethyl‐1,2‐diphenylethane‐1,2‐diamine) because the activation barrier of transmetalation with L2 is lower than that with L1 . Importantly, the Ni⁰–Ni^II catalytic cycle is not favored in the present systems because reductive elimination from both singlet and triplet [Ni^II( L1 )(R₁)(R₂)] is very difficult.     

Direct Access to Isotopically Labeled Aliphatic Ketones Mediated by Nickel(I) Activation

An extensive range of functionalized aliphatic ketones with good functional‐group tolerance has been prepared by a Ni^I‐promoted coupling of either primary or secondary alkyl iodides with NN₂ pincer Ni^II‐acyl complexes. The latter were easily accessed from the corresponding Ni^II‐alkyl complexes with stoichiometric CO. This Ni‐mediated carbonylative coupling is adaptable to late‐stage carbon isotope labeling, as illustrated by the preparation of isotopically labelled pharmaceuticals. Preliminary investigations suggest the intermediacy of carbon‐centered radicals.     

Judicious Ligand Design in Ruthenium Polypyridyl CO2 Reduction Catalysts to Enhance Reactivity by Steric and Electronic Effects

A series of Ru^II polypyridyl complexes of the structural design [Ru^II(R?tpy)(NN)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (R?tpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=H) or 4,4′,4′′‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=tBu); NN=2,2′‐bipyridine with methyl substituents in various positions) have been synthesized and analyzed for their ability to function as electrocatalysts for the reduction of CO₂ to CO. Detailed electrochemical analyses establish how substitutions at different ring positions of the bipyridine and terpyridine ligands can have profound electronic and, even more importantly, steric effects that determine the complexes’ reactivities. Whereas electron‐donating groups para to the heteroatoms exhibit the expected electronic effect, with an increase in turnover frequencies at increased overpotential, the introduction of a methyl group at the ortho position of NN imposes drastic steric effects. Two complexes, [Ru^II(tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 3 ]²⁺; 6‐mbpy=6‐methyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine) and [Ru^II(tBu?tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 4 ]²⁺), in which the methyl group of the 6‐mbpy ligand is trans to the CH₃CN ligand, show electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction at a previously unreactive oxidation state of the complex. This low overpotential pathway follows an ECE mechanism (electron transfer–chemical reaction–electron transfer), and is a direct result of steric interactions that facilitate CH₃CN ligand dissociation, CO₂ coordination, and ultimately catalytic turnover at the first reduction potential of the complexes. All experimental observations are rigorously corroborated by DFT calculations.     

Mechanistic Insights into the Ni‐Catalyzed Reductive Carboxylation of C−O Bonds in Aromatic Esters with CO2: Understanding Remarkable Ligand and Traceless‐Directing‐Group Effects

The mechanism of the Ni⁰‐catalyzed reductive carboxylation reaction of C(sp²)?O and C(sp³)?O bonds in aromatic esters with CO₂ to access valuable carboxylic acids was comprehensively studied by using DFT calculations. Computational results revealed that this transformation was composed of several key steps: C?O bond cleavage, reductive elimination, and/or CO₂ insertion. Of these steps, C?O bond cleavage was found to be rate‐determining, and it occurred through either oxidative addition to form a Ni^II intermediate, or a radical pathway that involved a bimetallic species to generate two Ni^I species through homolytic dissociation of the C?O bond. DFT calculations revealed that the oxidative addition step was preferred in the reductive carboxylation reactions of C(sp²)?O and C(sp³)?O bonds in substrates with extended π systems. In contrast, oxidative addition was highly disfavored when traceless directing groups were involved in the reductive coupling of substrates without extended π systems. In such cases, the presence of traceless directing groups allowed for docking of a second Ni⁰ catalyst, and the reactions proceed through a bimetallic radical pathway, rather than through concerted oxidative addition, to afford two Ni^I species both kinetically and thermodynamically. These theoretical mechanistic insights into the reductive carboxylation reactions of C?O bonds were also employed to investigate several experimentally observed phenomena, including ligand‐dependent reactivity and site‐selectivity.     

Zincocene and Dizincocene N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes and Catalytic Hydrogenation of Imines and Ketones

The N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) adducts Zn(Cp^R)₂(NHC)] (Cp^R=C₅HMe₄, C₅H₄SiMe₃; NHC=ItBu, IDipp (Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl), IMes (Mes=mesityl), SIMes) were prepared and shown to be active catalysts for the hydrogenation of imines, whereas decamethylzincocene [ZnCp*₂] is highly active for the hydrogenation of ketones in the presence of noncoordinating NHCs. The abnormal carbene complex [Zn(OCHPh₂)₂(aItBu)]₂ was formed from spontaneous rearrangement of the ItBu ligand during incomplete hydrogenation of benzophenone. Two isolated Zn^I adducts [Zn₂Cp*₂(NHC)] (NHC=ItBu, SIMes) are presented and characterized as weak adducts on the basis of ¹³C NMR spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction experiments. A mechanistic proposal for the reduction of [ZnCp*₂] with H₂ to give [Zn₂Cp*₂] is discussed.     

Unexpected Macrocyclic Multinuclear Zinc and Nickel Complexes that Function as Multitasking Catalysts for CO2 Fixations

Unique self‐assembled macrocyclic multinuclear Zn^II and Ni^II complexes with binaphthyl‐bipyridyl ligands (L) were synthesized. X‐ray analysis revealed that these complexes consisted of an outer ring (Zn₃L₃ or Ni₃L₃) and an inner core (Zn₂ or Ni). In the Zn^II complex, the inner Zn₂ part rotated rapidly inside the outer ring in solution on an NMR timescale. These complexes exhibited dual catalytic activities for CO₂ fixations: synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO₂ and temperature‐switched N‐formylation/N‐methylation of amines with CO₂ and hydrosilane.     

Tuning the Stability and Reactivity of Metal‐bound Alkylperoxide by Remote Site Substitution of the Ligand

An alkylperoxonickel(II) complex with hydrotris(3,5‐diisopropyl‐4‐bromo‐1‐pyrazolyl)borate, [Ni^II(OOtBu)(Tp^iPr2,Br)] ( 3a ), is synthesized, and its chemical properties are compared with those of the prototype non‐brominated ligand derivative [Ni^II(OOtBu)(Tp^iPr2)] ( 3b ; Tp^iPr2=hydrotris(3,5‐diisopropyl‐1‐pyrazolyl)borate). Same synthetic procedures for the prototype 3b and its precursors can be employed to the synthesis of the Tp^iPr2,Br analogues. The dimeric nickel(II)‐hydroxo complex, [(Ni^IITp^iPr2,Br)₂(μ‐OH)₂] ( 2a ), can be synthesized by the base hydrolysis of the labile complexes [Ni^II(Y)(Tp^iPr2,Br)] (Y=NO₃ ( 1a ), OAc ( 1a′ )), which are obtained by the metathesis of NaTp^iPr2,Br with the corresponding nickel(II) salts, and the following dehydrative condensation of 2a with the stoichiometric amount of tert‐butylhydroperoxide yields 3a . The unique structural characteristics of the prototype 3b , that is, highly distorted geometry of the nickel center and intermediate coordination mode of the O O moiety between η¹ and η², are kept in the brominated ligand analogue 3a . The introduction of the electron‐withdrawing substitutents on the distal site of Tp^R affects the thermal stability and reactivity of the nickel(II)‐alkylperoxo species.     

Synthesis of a “Masked” Terminal Nickel(II) Sulfide by Reductive Deprotection and its Reaction with Nitrous Oxide

The addition of 1 equiv of KSCPh₃ to [L^RNiCl] (L^R={(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(R)}₂CH; R=Me, tBu) in C₆H₆ results in the formation of [L^RNi(SCPh₃)] ( 1 : R=Me; 2 : R=tBu) in good yields. Subsequent reduction of 1 and 2 with 2 equiv of KC₈ in cold (?25 °C) Et₂O in the presence of 2 equiv of 18‐crown‐6 results in the formation of “masked” terminal Ni^II sulfides, [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^RNi(S)] ( 3 : R=Me; 4 : R=tBu), also in good yields. An X‐ray crystallographic analysis of these complexes suggests that they feature partial multiple‐bond character in their Ni? S linkages. Addition of N₂O to a toluene solution of 4 provides [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^tBuNi(SN?NO)], which features the first example of a thiohyponitrite (κ²‐[SN?NO]^2?) ligand.     

Linkage Isomerism and Spin Frustration in Heterometallic Rings: Synthesis,Structural Characterization,and Magnetic and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Cr7Ni,Cr6Ni2, and Cr7Ni2 Rings Templated About Imidazolium Cations

The synthesis and structural characterization of three heterometallic rings templated about imidazolium cations is reported. The compounds are [2,4‐DiMe‐ImidH][Cr₇Ni^IIF₈(O₂CtBu)₁₆] 1 (2,4‐DiMe‐ImidH=the cation of 2,4‐dimethylimidazole), [ImidH]₂[Cr₆Ni^II₂F₈(O₂CCtBu)₁₆] 2 (ImidH=the cation of imidazole), and [1‐Bz‐ImidH]₂ [Cr₇Ni^II₂F₉(O₂CtBu)₁₈] 3 (1‐Bz‐ImidH=the cation of 1‐benzylimidazole). The structures show the formation of octagonal arrays of metals for 1 and 2 and a nonagon of metal centers for 3 . In all cases the edges of the polygon are bridged by a single fluoride and two pivalate ligands, and the position of the divalent metal centers cannot be distinguished by X‐ray diffraction. Magnetic studies combined with EPR spectroscopy allow the characterization of the magnetic states of the compounds. In each case the exchange is antiferromagnetic with a magnetic exchange parameter J≈?5.8 cm^?1, and it is not possible to differentiate the exchange between two Cr^III centers (J_CrCr) from the exchange between a Cr^III and a Ni^II center (J_CrNi). For 2 there is evidence for the presence of at least two, possibly four, linkage isomers of the heterometallic ring, caused by the presence of two divalent metal centers in the ring. The EPR spectroscopy of 3 suggests an S=1/2 ground state of the ring and that it is likely that only one linkage isomer is present.     

Normal‐to‐Abnormal NHC Rearrangement of AlIII,GaIII, and InIII Trialkyl Complexes: Scope,Mechanism, Reactivity Studies,and H2 Activation

The present contribution reports experimental and theoretical mechanistic investigations on a normal‐to‐abnormal (C2‐to‐C4‐bonded) NHC rearrangement processes occurring with bulky group 13 metal NHC adducts, including the scope of such a reactivity for Al compounds. The sterically congested adducts (nItBu)MMe₃ (nItBu=1,3‐di‐tert‐butylimidazol‐2‐ylidene; M=Al, Ga, In; 1 a – c ) readily rearrange to quantitatively afford the corresponding C4‐bonded complexes (aItBu)MMe₃ ( 4 a – c ), a reaction that may be promoted by THF. Thorough experimental data and DFT calculations were performed on the nNHC‐to‐aNHC process converting the Al‐nNHC ( 1 a ) to its aNHC analogue 4 a . A nItBu/aItBu isomerization is proposed to account for the formation of the thermodynamic product 4 a through reaction of transient aItBu with THF–AlMe₃. The reaction of benzophenone with (nItBu)AlMe₃ afforded the zwitterionic species (aItBu)(CPh₂‐O‐AlMe₃) ( 6 ), reflecting the unusual reactivity that such bulky adducts may display. Interestingly, the nItBu/Al(iBu)₃ Lewis pair behaves like a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) since it readily reacts with H₂ under mild conditions. This may open the way to future reactivity developments involving commonly used trialkylaluminum precursors.     

[(IPent)PdCl2(morpholine)]: A Readily Activated Precatalyst for Room‐Temperature,Additive‐Free Carbon–Sulfur Coupling

A series of new, easily activated NHC–Pd^II precatalysts featuring a trans‐oriented morpholine ligand were prepared and evaluated for activity in carbon‐sulfur cross‐coupling chemistry. [(IPent)PdCl₂(morpholine)] (IPent=1,3‐bis(2,6‐di(3‐pentyl)phenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene) was identified as the most active precatalyst and was shown to effectively couple a wide variety of deactivated aryl halides with both aryl and alkyl thiols at or near ambient temperature, without the need for additives, external activators, or pre‐activation steps. Mechanistic studies revealed that, in contrast to other common NHC–Pd^II precatalysts, these complexes are rapidly reduced to the active NHC–Pd⁰ species at ambient temperature in the presence of KOtBu, thus avoiding the formation of deleterious off‐cycle Pd^II–thiolate resting states.     

Multicomponent One‐pot Reactions Towards the Synthesis of Stereoisomers of Dipicolylamine Complexes

Reported are multi‐component one‐pot syntheses of chiral complexes [M(L^ROR′)Cl₂] or [M(L^RSR′)Cl₂] from the mixture of an N‐substituted ethylenediamine, pyridine‐2‐carboxaldehyde, a primary alcohol or thiol and MCl₂ utilizing in‐situ formed cyclized Schiff bases where a C?O bond, two stereocenters, and three C?N bonds are formed (M=Zn, Cu, Ni, Cd; R=Et, Ph; R′=Me, Et, nPr, nBu). Tridentate ligands L^ROR′ and L^RSR′ comprise two chiral centers and a hemiaminal ether or hemiaminal thioether moiety on the dipicolylamine skeleton. Syn‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] precipitates out readily from the reaction mixture as a major product whereas anti‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] stays in solution as minor product. Both syn‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] and anti‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] were characterized using NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Solid‐state structures revealed that syn‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] adopted a square pyramidal geometry while anti‐[Zn(L^PhOMe)Cl₂] possesses a trigonal bipyramidal geometry around the Zn centers. The scope of this method was shown to be wide by varying the components of the dynamic coordination assembly, and the structures of the complexes isolated were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X‐ray crystallography. Syn complexes were isolated as major products with Zn^II and Cu^II, and anti complexes were found to be major products with Ni^II and Cd^II. Hemiaminals and hemiaminal ethers are known to be unstable and are seldom observed as part of cyclic organic compounds or as coordinated ligands assembled around metals. It is now shown, with the support of experimental results, that linear hemiaminal ethers or thioethers can be assembled without the assistance of Lewis acidic metals in the multi‐component assembly, and a possible pathway of the formation of hemiaminal ethers has been proposed.     

Understanding the Subtleties of Frustrated Lewis Pair Activation of Carbonyl Compounds by N‐Heterocyclic Carbene/Alkyl Gallium Pairings

This study reports the use of the trisalkylgallium GaR₃ (R=CH₂SiMe₃), containing sterically demanding monosilyl groups, as an effective Lewis‐acid component for frustrated Lewis pair activation of carbonyl compounds, when combined with the bulky N‐heterocyclic carbene 1,3‐bis(tert‐butyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene (ItBu) or 1,3‐bis(tert‐butyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene (SItBu). The reduction of aldehydes can be achieved by insertion into the C=O functionality at the C2 (so‐called normal) position of the carbene affording zwitterionic products [ItBuCH₂OGaR₃] ( 1 ) or [ItBuCH(p‐Br‐C₆H₄)OGaR₃] ( 2 ), or alternatively, at its abnormal (C4) site yielding [aItBuCH(p‐Br‐C₆H₄)OGaR₃] ( 3 ). As evidence of the cooperative behaviour of both components, ItBu and GaR₃, neither of them alone are able to activate any of the carbonyl‐containing substrates included in this study NMR spectroscopic studies of the new compounds point to complex equilibria involving the formation of kinetic and thermodynamic species as implicated through DFT calculations. Extension to ketones proved successful for electrophilic α,α,α‐trifluoroacetophenone, yielding [aItBuC(Ph)(CF₃)OGaR₃] ( 7 ). However, in the case of ketones and nitriles bearing acidic hydrogen atoms, C?H bond activation takes place preferentially, affording novel imidazolium gallate salts such as [{ItBuH}⁺{(p‐I‐C₆H₄)C(CH₂)OGaR₃}^?] ( 8 ) or [{ItBuH}⁺{Ph₂C=C=NGaR₃}^?] ( 12 ).     

Oxidation State Dependent Coordination Modes: Accessing an Amidate‐Supported Nickel(I) δ‐bis(C−H) Agostic Complex

Amidate‐supported two‐ and three‐coordinate Ni^I complexes were synthesized by reduction of the corresponding Ni^II precursors. A dramatic change in binding mode is observed upon reduction from Ni^II to Ni^I. The Ni^I derivatives include an unprecedented Ni^I bis(C?H) agostic complex and a two‐coordinate Ni^I complex.     

Mechanistic insight into initiation and chain transfer reaction of CO2/cyclohexene oxide copolymerization catalyzed by zinc?cobalt double metal cyanide complex catalysts

Although zinc? cobalt (III) double metal cyanide complex (Zn? Co (III) DMCC) catalyst is a highly active and selective catalyst for carbon dioxide (CO₂)/cyclohexene oxide (CHO) copolymerization, the structure of the resultant copolymer is poorly understood and the catalytic mechanism is still unclear. Combining the results of kinetic study and electrospray ionization‐mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS) spectra for CO₂/CHO copolymerization catalyzed by Zn? Co (III) DMCC catalyst, we disclosed that (1) the short ether units were mainly generated at the early stage of the copolymerization, and were hence in the “head” of the copolymer and (2) all resultant PCHCs presented two end hydroxyl (? OH) groups. One end ? OH group came from the initiation of zinc? hydroxide (Zn? OH) bond and the other end ? OH group was produced by the chain transfer reaction of propagating chain to H₂O (or free copolymer). Adding t‐BuOH (CHO: t‐BuOH = 2:1, v/v) to the reaction system led to the production of fully alternating PCHCs and new active site of Zn? Ot‐Bu, which was proved by the observation of PCHCs with one end ? Ot‐Bu (and ? OCOOt‐Bu) group from ESI‐MS and ¹³C NMR spectra. Moreover, Zn?OH bond in Zn? Co (III) DMCC catalyst was also characterized by the combined results from FT‐IR, TGA and elemental analysis. This work provided new evidences that CO₂/CHO copolymerization was initiated by metal? OH bond. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Formation and Dissociation of Tetrahedral Nickel(II) and Cobalt(II) Complexes of ‘Dithioimidodiphosphato’ Ligands,Measurement of Kinetically Determined Stability Constants,and Kinetic Investigations of the Rapid Formation of Tetrahedral Bis(ligand)copper(II) Complexes and Their Rates of Reduction to Trinuclear Copper(I) Species

The stopped‐flow technique was used to measure the rates of formation and dissociation of tetrahedral [ML₂] complexes (M²⁺=Ni²⁺ or Co²⁺) of four bidentate S₂‐donor ‘dithioimidodiphosphato’ ligands L^? (HL=[R¹R²P(?S)]NH[P(?S)R³R⁴], R¹ to R⁴=alkyl) at 25.0° in MeOH/H₂O 95 : 5 (v/v) solution and in the presence of either MOPS (=3‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)propane‐1‐sulfonic acid) or 2,6‐lutidine (=2,6‐dimethylpyridine) buffers. The kinetically determined equilibrium formation constants for [ML]⁺ ions (M=Ni or Co) are 10^?5 K=0.50±0.01 or 1.64±0.07 l mol^?1 for L=L³ (R¹=R²=Me(CH₂)₂CH(Me), R³=R⁴=Me₂CH), 1.27±0.02 or 7.93±0.09 l mol^?1 for L=L⁷ (R¹ to R⁴=Me₂CHCH₂), 0.88±0.04 or 3.84±0.13 l mol^?1 for L=L⁸ (R¹ to R⁴=Me₂CH), and in case of Ni²⁺ 1.88±0.04 l mol^?1 for L=L⁶ (R¹=R³=Bu, R²=R⁴=^tBu) (see Table 3; for L³ and L⁶–L⁸, see Table 1). Whereas the tetrahedral Ni²⁺ complexes dissociate more slowly than the analogous Co²⁺ species, in all cases, the Co²⁺ complexes are more stable than those of Ni²⁺ due to their larger formation rate constants (Table 3). Reactions of Cu²⁺ with eight ligands HL (R¹ to R⁴=alkyl, alkoxy, aryl, and aryloxy) show that formation of intensely colored tetrahedral [Cu^IIL₂] species is too fast be measured with the available stopped‐flow apparatus (t_1/2<2 ms), but the subsequent rates of reduction of [Cu^IIL₂] to give trinuclear products [Cu^I₃L₃] are measurable. An X‐ray analysis establishes the structure of one of the [Cu₃L₃] complexes, where R¹=R²=Me₂CHO and R³=R⁴=2‐(tert‐butyl)phenyl (L=L⁵), and a multiwavelength stopped‐flow kinetic experiment establishes the spectrum of a tetrahedral [Cu^IIL₂] species prior to the reduction reactions. The redox reactions proceed at 25.0° with first‐order rate constants in the range 0.285 s^?1 (R¹ to R⁴=PhO; L=L¹¹) to 2.58?10^?4 s^?1 (R¹ to R⁴=Me₂CHCH₂; L=L⁷) (Table 4).     

Synthesis and catalytic activity of binuclear cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes

Summary Binuclear Ni^II and Co^II complexes derived from 2,6-diformyl-4-methylphenol and various aromatic monoamines have been prepared and investigated. The Ni^II complexes have Ni₂LCl₃ composition while the Co^II complexes have Co₂L₂Cl₂ composition, where L represents the organic ligand. The complexes are active catalysts in the oxidation of 3,5-di-t-butylcatechol (3,5-DTBC) by dioxygen, but less so than their Cu analogues. This result is attributed to the absence of antiferromagnetic coupling between the metal centres.     

Effects of Zinc(II) on the Luminescence of Europium(III) in Complexes Containing β‐Diketone and Schiff Bases

The UV, excitation, and luminescence spectra of tris(pivaloyltrifluoroacetonato)europium(III) ([Eu(pta)₃]; Hpta=1,1,1‐trifluoro‐5,5‐dimethylhexane‐2,4‐dione=HA) were measured in the presence of bis(salicylidene)trimethylenediamine (H₂saltn), bis[5‐(tert‐butyl)salicylidene]trimethylenediamine (H₂(^tBu)saltn), or bis(salicylidene)cyclohexane‐1,2‐diyldiamine (H₂salchn), and the corresponding Zn^II complexes [ZnB] (B=Schiff base). The excitation and luminescence spectra of the solution containing [Eu(pta)₃] and [Zn(salchn)] exhibited much stronger intensities than those of solutions containing the other [ZnB] complexes. The introduction of a ^tBu group into the Schiff base was not effective in sensitizing the luminescence of [Eu(pta)₃]. The luminescence spectrum of [ZnB] showed a band around 450 nm. The intensity decreased in the presence of [Eu(pta)₃], reflecting complexation between [Eu(pta)₃] and [ZnB]. On the basis of the change in intensity against the concentration of [ZnB], stability constants were determined for [Eu(pta)₃Zn(saltn)], [Eu(pta)₃Zn{(^tBu)saltn}], and [Eu(pta)₃Zn(salchn)] as 4.13, 4.9 and 5.56, respectively (log , where =[[Eu(pta)₃ZnB]]([[Eu(pta)₃]][[ZnB]])^?1). The quantum yields of these binuclear complexes were determined as 0.15, 0.11, and 0.035, although [Eu(pta)₃Zn(salchn)] revealed the strongest luminescence at 613 nm. The results of X‐ray diffraction analysis for [Eu(pta)₃Zn(saltn)] showed that Zn^II had a coordination number of five and was bridged with Eu^III by three donor O‐atoms, i.e., two from the salicylidene moieties and one from the ketonato group pta.     

Structurally Defined Potassium‐Mediated Zincation of Pyridine and 4‐R‐Substituted Pyridines (R=Et,iPr, tBu,Ph, and Me2N) by Using Dialkyl–TMP–Zincate Bases

Two potassium–dialkyl–TMP–zincate bases [(pmdeta)K(μ‐Et)(μ‐tmp)Zn(Et)] ( 1 ) (PMDETA=N,N,N′,N′′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine, TMP=2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidide), and [(pmdeta)K(μ‐nBu)(μ‐tmp)Zn(nBu)] ( 2 ), have been synthesized by a simple co‐complexation procedure. Treatment of 1 with a series of substituted 4‐R‐pyridines (R=Me₂N, H, Et, iPr, tBu, and Ph) gave 2‐zincated products of the general formula [{2‐Zn(Et)₂‐μ‐4‐R‐C₅H₃N}₂ ? 2{K(pmdeta)}] ( 3 – 8 , respectively) in isolated crystalline yields of 53, 16, 7, 23, 67, and 51 %, respectively; the treatment of 2 with 4‐tBu‐pyridine gave [{2‐Zn(nBu)₂‐μ‐4‐tBu‐C₅H₃N}₂ ? 2{K(pmdeta)}] ( 9 ) in an isolated crystalline yield of 58 %. Single‐crystal X‐ray crystallographic and NMR spectroscopic characterization of 3 – 9 revealed a novel structural motif consisting of a dianionic dihydroanthracene‐like tricyclic ring system with a central diazadicarbadizinca (ZnCN)₂ ring, face‐capped on either side by PMDETA‐wrapped K⁺ cations. All the new metalated pyridine complexes share this dimeric arrangement. As determined by NMR spectroscopic investigations of the reaction filtrates, those solutions producing 3 , 7 , 8 , and 9 appear to be essentially clean reactions, in contrast to those producing 4 , 5 , and 6 , which also contain laterally zincated coproducts. In all of these metalation reactions, the potassium–zincate base acts as an amido transfer agent with a subsequent ligand‐exchange mechanism (amido replacing alkyl) inhibited by the coordinative saturation, and thus, low Lewis acidity of the 4‐coordinate Zn centers in these dimeric molecules. Studies on analogous trialkyl–zincate reagents in the absence and presence of stoichiometric or substoichiometric amounts of TMP(H) established the importance of Zn? N bonds for efficient zincation.