The smooth Banach submanifold B*(E, F) in B(E, F)

Let E,F be two Banach spaces,B(E,F),B+(E,F),Φ(E,F),SΦ(E,F) and R(E,F) be bounded linear,double splitting,Fredholm,semi-Frdholm and finite rank operators from E into F,respectively. Let Σ be any one of the following sets:{T ∈Φ(E,F):Index T=constant and dim N(T)=constant},{T ∈ SΦ(E,F):either dim N(T)=constant< ∞ or codim R(T)=constant< ∞} and {T ∈ R(E,F):Rank T=constant< ∞}. Then it is known that Σ is a smooth submanifold of B(E,F) with the tangent space TAΣ={B ∈ B(E,F):BN(A)-R(A) } for any A ∈Σ. However,for ...     

Additive Set of Idempotents in Rings

Let R be a ring with identity 1, I(R) be the set of all nonunit idempotents in R, and M(R) be the set of all primitive idempotents and 0 of R. We say that I(R) is additive if for all e, f ∈ I(R) (e ≠ f), e + f ∈ I(R), and M(R) is additive in I(R) if for all e, f ∈ M(R)(e ≠ f), e + f ∈ I(R). In this article, the following points are shown: (1) I(R) is additive if and only if I(R) is multiplicative and the characteristic of R is 2; M(R) is additive in I(R) if and only if M(R) is orthogonal. If 0 ≠ ef ∈ I(R) for some e ∈ M(R) and f ∈ I(R), then ef ∈ M(R), (2) If R has a complete set of primitive idempotents, then R is a finite product of connected rings if and only if I(R) is multiplicative if and only if M(R) is additive in I(R).     

Vanishing Derivations and Co-Centralizing Generalized Derivations on Multilinear Polynomials in Prime Rings

Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 with Utumi quotient ring U and extended centroid C, and f(x₁,…, x_n) be a multilinear polynomial over C, which is not central valued on R. Suppose that F and G are two generalized derivations of R and d is a nonzero derivation of R such that d(F(f(r))f(r) ? f(r)G(f(r))) = 0 for all r = (r₁,…, r_n) ∈ Rⁿ, then one of the following holds:

1. There exist a, p, q, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = ax + xp + λx, G(x) = px + xq and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a ? q] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R;

2. There exists a ∈ U such that F(x) = xa and G(x) = ax for all x ∈ R;

3. There exist a, b, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx, G(x) = ax + xb and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with b + αc ∈ C for some α ∈C;

4. R satisfies s₄ and there exist a, b ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx and G(x) = ax + xb for all x ∈ R;

5. There exist a′, b, c ∈ U and δ a derivation of R such that F(x) = a′x + xb ? δ(x), G(x) = bx + δ(x) and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a′] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R.

     

Divisibility of matrices associated with multiplicative functions

Let S={x₁,…,x_n} be a set of n distinct positive integers. For x,y∈S and y<x, we say the y is a greatest-type divisor of x in S if y∣x and it can be deduced that z=y from y∣z,z∣x,z<x and z∈S. For x∈S, let G_S(x) denote the set of all greatest-type divisors of x in S. For any arithmetic function f, let (f(x_i,x_j)) denote the n×n matrix having f evaluated at the greatest common divisor (x_i,x_j) of x_i and x_j as its i,j-entry and let (f[x_i,x_j]) denote the n×n matrix having f evaluated at the least common multiple [x_i,x_j] of x_i and x_j as its i,j-entry. In this paper, we assume that S is a gcd-closed set and . We show that if f is a multiplicative function such that (f∗μ)(d)∈Z whenever and f(a)|f(b) whenever a|b and a,b∈S and (f(x_i,x_j)) is nonsingular, then the matrix (f(x_i,x_j)) divides the matrix (f[x_i,x_j]) in the ring M_n(Z) of n×n matrices over the integers. As a consequence, we show that (f(x_i,x_j)) divides (f[x_i,x_j]) in the ring M_n(Z) if (f∗μ)(d)∈Z whenever and f is a completely multiplicative function such that (f(x_i,x_j)) is nonsingular. This confirms a conjecture of Hong raised in 2004.     

Existence of Three Positive Pseudo-symmetric Solutions for a One Dimensional Discrete p-Laplacian

We apply the Five Functionals Fixed Point Theorem to verify the existence of at least three positive pseudo-symmetric solutions for the discrete three point boundary value problem, ?(g(?u(t-1)))+a(t))f(u(t))=0, for t∈{a+1,…,b+1} and u(a)=0 with u(v)=u(b+2) where g(v)=|v| ^p-2 v, p>1, for some fixed v∈{a+1,…,b+1} and σ=(b+2+v)/2 is an integer.     

Compact operators which factor through subspaces of lp

Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. A subset K of a Banach space X is said to be relatively p ‐compact if there is an 〈x_n 〉 ∈ l^s _p (X) such that for every k ∈ K there is an 〈α_n 〉 ∈ l_{p ′} such that k = σ^∞_n=1 α_n x_n . A linear operator T: X → Y is said to be p ‐compact if T (Ball (X)) is relatively p ‐compact in Y. The set of all p ‐compact operators K_p (X, Y) from X to Y is a Banach space with a suitable factorization norm κ_p and (K_p , κ_p ) is a Banach operator ideal. In this paper we investigate the dual operator ideal (K^d _p , κ^d _p ). It is shown that κ^d _p (T) = π_p (T) for all T ∈ B (X, Y) if either X or Y is finite‐dimensional. As a consequence it is proved that the adjoint ideal of K^d _p is I_{p ′}, the ideal of p ′‐integral operators. Further, a composition/decomposition theorem K^d _p = Π_p K is proved which also yields that (Π^min _p )^inj = K^d _p . Finally, we discuss the density of finite rank operators in K^d _p and give some examples for different values of p in this respect. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Decomposition tree of a lexicographic product of binary structures

Given a set S and a positive integer k, a binary structure is a function . The set S is denoted by V(B) and the integer k is denoted by . With each subset X of V(B) associate the binary substructure B[X] of B induced by X defined by B[X](x,y)=B(x,y) for any x≠y∈X. A subset X of V(B) is a clan of B if for any x,y∈X and v∈V(B)?X, B(x,v)=B(y,v) and B(v,x)=B(v,y). A subset X of V(B) is a hyperclan of B if X is a clan of B satisfying: for every clan Y of B, if X∩Y≠0?, then X⊆Y or Y⊆X. With each binary structure B associate the family Π(B) of the maximal proper and nonempty hyperclans under inclusion of B. The decomposition tree of a binary structure B is constituted by the hyperclans X of B such that Π(B[X])≠0? and by the elements of Π(B[X]). Given binary structures B and C such that , the lexicographic product B⌊C⌋ of C by B is defined on V(B)×V(C) as follows. For any (x,y)≠(x^′,y^′)∈V(B)×V(C), B⌊C⌋((x,x^′),(y,y^′))=B(x,y) if x≠y and B⌊C⌋((x,x^′),(y,y^′))=C(x^′,y^′) if x=y. The decomposition tree of the lexicographic product B⌊C⌋ is described from the decomposition trees of B and C.     

Linear maps between C*-algebras that are *-homomorphisms at a fixed point

Let A and B be C*-algebras. A linear map T : A → B is said to be a *-homomorphism at an element z ∈ A if ab* = z in A implies T (ab*) = T (a)T (b)* = T (z), and c*d = z in A gives T (c*d) = T (c)*T (d) = T (z). Assuming that A is unital, we prove that every linear map T : A → B which is a *-homomorphism at the unit of A is a Jordan *-homomorphism. If A is simple and infinite, then we establish that a linear map T : A → B is a *-homomorphism if and only if T is a *-homomorphism at the unit of A. For a general unital C*-algebra A and a linear map T : A → B, we prove that T is a *-homomorphism if, and only if, T is a *-homomorphism at 0 and at 1. Actually if p is a non-zero projection in A, and T is a ^?-homomorphism at p and at 1 ? p, then we prove that T is a Jordan *-homomorphism. We also study bounded linear maps that are *-homomorphisms at a unitary element in A.     

On the neutrix composition of the distributions x −s ln m |x| and x r

Let F be a distribution and let f be a locally summable function. The distribution F(f) is defined as the neutrix limit of the sequence {F _n (f)}, where F _n (x) = F(x) * δ _n (x) and {δ _n (x)} is a certain sequence of infinitely differentiable functions converging to the Dirac delta-function δ(x). The composition of the distributions x ^?s ln ^m |x| and x ^r is proved to exist and be equal to r ^m x ^?rs ln ^m |x| for r, s, m = 2, 3….     

The Convexity Number of a Graph

 For two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, the set I[u,v] consists of all those vertices lying on a u−v shortest path in G, while for a set S of vertices of G, the set I[S] is the union of all sets I[u,v] for u,v∈S. A set S is convex if I[S]=S. The convexity number con(G) of G is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of G. The clique number ω(G) is the maximum cardinality of a clique in G. If G is a connected graph of order n that is not complete, then n≥3 and 2≤ω(G)≤con(G)≤n−1. It is shown that for every triple l,k,n of integers with n≥3 and 2≤l≤k≤n−1, there exists a noncomplete connected graph G of order n with ω(G)=l and con(G)=k. Other results on convex numbers are also presented. Received: August 19, 1998 Final version received: May 17, 2000     

Associativity of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">∇</Emphasis>-operation on bands in rings

Given a multiplicative band of idempotents S in a ring R, for all e,f∈S the ∇-product e ∇ f=e+f+fe−efe−fef is an idempotent that lies roughly above e and f in R just as ef and fe lie roughly below e and f. In this paper we study ∇-bands in rings, that is, bands in rings that are closed under ∇, giving various criteria for ∇ to be associative, thus making the band a skew lattice. We also consider when a given band S in R generates a ∇-band.     

On edge star sets in trees

Let A be a Hermitian matrix whose graph is G (i.e. there is an edge between the vertices i and j in G if and only if the (i,j) entry of A is non-zero). Let λ be an eigenvalue of A with multiplicity m_A(λ). An edge e=ij is said to be Parter (resp., neutral, downer) for λ,A if m_A(λ)−m_A−e(λ) is negative (resp., 0, positive ), where A−e is the matrix resulting from making the (i,j) and (j,i) entries of A zero. For a tree T with adjacency matrix A a subset S of the edge set of G is called an edge star set for an eigenvalue λ of A, if |S|=m_A(λ) and A−S has no eigenvalue λ. In this paper the existence of downer edges and edge star sets for non-zero eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of a tree is proved. We prove that neutral edges always exist for eigenvalues of multiplicity more than 1. It is also proved that an edge e=uv is a downer edge for λ,A if and only if u and v are both downer vertices for λ,A; and e=uv is a neutral edge if u and v are neutral vertices. Among other results, it is shown that any edge star set for each eigenvalue of a tree is a matching.     

Chaos caused by a strong-mixing measure-preserving transformation

The chaos caused by a strong-mixing preserving transformation is discussed and it is shown that for a topological spaceX satisfying the second axiom of countability and for an outer measurem onX satisfying the conditions: (i) every non-empty open set ofX ism-measurable with positivem-measure; (ii) the restriction ofm on Borel σ-algebra ℬ(X) ofX is a probability measure, and (iii) for everyY⊂X there exists a Borel setB⊂ℬ(X) such thatB⊃Y andm(B) =m(Y), iff:X→X is a strong-mixing measure-preserving transformation of the probability space (X, ℬ(X),m), and if {m}, is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers, then there exists a subsetC⊂X withm (C) = 1, finitely chaotic with respect to the sequence {m _i}, i.e. for any finite subsetA ofC and for any mapF:A→X there is a subsequencer _i such that lim_i→∞ f ^r i(a) =F(a) for anya ∈A. There are some applications to maps of one dimension. the National Natural Science Foundation of China.     

Dimensions of Formal Fibers of Height One Prime Ideals

Let T be a complete local (Noetherian) ring with maximal ideal M, P a nonmaximal ideal of T, and C = {Q ₁, Q ₂,…} a (nonempty) finite or countable set of nonmaximal prime ideals of T. Let {p ₁, p ₂,…} be a set of nonzero regular elements of T, whose cardinality is the same as that of C. Suppose that p _i  ∈ Q _j if and only if i = j. We give conditions that ensure there is an excellent local unique factorization domain A such that A is a subring of T, the maximal ideal of A is M ∩ A, the (M ∩ A)-adic completion of A is T, and so that the following three conditions hold: (1) p _i  ∈ A for every i; (2) A ∩ P = (0), and if J is a prime ideal of T with J ∩ A = (0), then J ? P or J ? Q _i for some i; (3) for each i, p _i A is a prime ideal of A, Q _i ∩ A = p _i A, and if J is a prime ideal of T with J ? Q _i , then J ∩ A ≠ p _i A.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-domatic number of a graph

Let k be a positive integer, and let G be a simple graph with vertex set V (G). A k-dominating set of the graph G is a subset D of V (G) such that every vertex of V (G)-D is adjacent to at least k vertices in D. A k-domatic partition of G is a partition of V (G) into k-dominating sets. The maximum number of dominating sets in a k-domatic partition of G is called the k-domatic number d _k (G). In this paper, we present upper and lower bounds for the k-domatic number, and we establish Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results. Some of our results extend those for the classical domatic number d(G) = d ₁(G).      

Graceful Signed Graphs

A (p, q)-sigraph S is an ordered pair (G, s) where G = (V, E) is a (p, q)-graph and s is a function which assigns to each edge of G a positive or a negative sign. Let the sets E ⁺ and E ^– consist of m positive and n negative edges of G, respectively, where m + n = q. Given positive integers k and d, S is said to be (k, d)-graceful if the vertices of G can be labeled with distinct integers from the set {0, 1, ..., k + (q – 1)d such that when each edge uv of G is assigned the product of its sign and the absolute difference of the integers assigned to u and v the edges in E ⁺ and E ^– are labeled k, k + d, k + 2d, ..., k + (m – 1)d and –k, – (k + d), – (k + 2d), ..., – (k + (n – 1)d), respectively.In this paper, we report results of our preliminary investigation on the above new notion, which indeed generalises the well-known concept of (k, d)-graceful graphs due to B. D. Acharya and S. M. Hegde.     

Gaussian Property of the Rings R(X) and R〈X〉

The content of a polynomial f over a commutative ring R is the ideal c(f) of R generated by the coefficients of f. A commutative ring R is said to be Gaussian if c(fg) = c(f)c(g) for every polynomials f and g in R[X]. A number of authors have formulated necessary and sufficient conditions for R(X) (respectively, R?X?) to be semihereditary, have weak global dimension at most one, be arithmetical, or be Prüfer. An open question raised by Glaz is to formulate necessary and sufficient conditions that R(X) (respectively, R?X?) have the Gaussian property. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the rings R(X) and R?X? in terms of the ring R in case the square of the nilradical of R is zero.     

Some path properties of generalized Lévy sheet

Let X(t) be an N parameter generalized Lévy sheet taking values in ℝ^d with a lower index α, ℜ = {(s, t] = ∏ _i=1 ^N (s _i, t _i], s _i < t _i}, E(x, Q) = {t ∈ Q: X(t) = x}, Q ∈ ℜ be the level set of X at x and X(Q) = {x: ∃t ∈ Q such that X(t) = x} be the image of X on Q. In this paper, the problems of the existence and increment size of the local times for X(t) are studied. In addition, the Hausdorff dimension of E(x, Q) and the upper bound of a uniform dimension for X(Q) are also established.     

Stability interval for explicit difference schemes for multi-dimensional second-order hyperbolic equations with significant first-order space derivative terms

In this piece of work, we introduce a new idea and obtain stability interval for explicit difference schemes of O(k²+h²) for one, two and three space dimensional second-order hyperbolic equations u_tt=a(x,t)u_xx+α(x,t)u_x-2η²(x,t)u,u_tt=a(x,y,t)u_xx+b(x,y,t)u_yy+α(x,y,t)u_x+β(x,y,t)u_y-2η²(x,y,t)u, and u_tt=a(x,y,z,t)u_xx+b(x,y,z,t)u_yy+c(x,y,z,t)u_zz+α(x,y,z,t)u_x+β(x,y,z,t)u_y+γ(x,y,z,t)u_z-2η²(x,y,z,t)u,0<x,y,z<1,t>0 subject to appropriate initial and Dirichlet boundary conditions, where h>0 and k>0 are grid sizes in space and time coordinates, respectively. A new idea is also introduced to obtain explicit difference schemes of O(k²) in order to obtain numerical solution of u at first time step in a different manner.