Preparation of poly(aryleneethynylene)–type copolymers containing flexible linking methylene units. Optical properties of the copolymers suggesting occurrence of energy transfer between π–conjugated local units

Palladium–catalyzed polycondensation between 2,5–diiodo–3–hexylthiophene I–Th(Hex)–I with mixtures of p–diethynylbenzene HCC—Ph—CCH and α,ω–diethynylalkane HCC(CH₂)_lCCH (l = 3 or 8) gives poly(aryleneethynylene) PAE–type copolymers [CC(CH₂)_lCC—Th(Hex)]_m[CC—Ph—CC—Th(Hex)]_n containing the methylene unit. The copolymers have a molecular weight (M_n) of about 1.2 × 10⁴ as determined by GPC (polystyrene standard) and are considered to possess essentially a random sequences in view of the —CC(CH₂)_lCC— and —CC—Ph—CC— units as judged from their UV–visible spectra. By the incorporation of the (CH₂)_l unit, the λ_max position of the corresponding PAE homopolymer [CC—Ph—CC—Th(Hex)]_n is shifted to a shorter wavelength. However, the copolymers give rise to a photoluminescence PL peak essentially agreeing with a PL peak of the homopolymer, suggesting occurrence of energy transfer in the copolymer. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 36: 2201–2207, 1998     

5:1 and 2:1 cocrystals of 2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorophenol with phenazine

2,3,4,5,6‐Pentafluorophenol (pFp), unlike phenol, forms cocrystals with the weak heteroaromatic base phenazine (phz). Two types of cocrystals were prepared, (I) with a high content of pFp, 2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorophenol–phenazine (5/1), 5C₆HF₅O·C₁₂H₈N₂, and (II) with a 2:1 pFp–phz molar ratio, 2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorophenol–phenazine (2/1), 2C₆HF₅O·C₁₂H₈N₂. In both forms, homostacks are formed by the heterocyclic base and phenol molecules and no aryl–perfluoroaryl stacking interactions occur. The arrangement of the molecules in the crystal of (I) is determined by strong O—H...N and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, weak O—H...F, C—H...F and C—H...O interactions, π–π stacking interactions between the phz molecules and C—F...π_F interactions within the pFp stacks. Among the specific interactions in (II) are a strong O—H...N hydrogen bond, weak C—H...F interactions and π–π stacking interactions between the phz molecules. In (I) and (II), the heterocyclic molecules are located around inversion centres and one of the symmetry‐independent pFp molecules in (I) is disordered about an inversion centre. Remarkably, similar structural fragments consisting of six pFp stacks can be identified in cocrystal (I) and in the known orthorhombic polymorph of pFp with Z′ = 3 [Gdaniec (2007). CrystEngComm, 9 , 286–288].     

catena‐Poly[dibromozinc(II)‐μ‐ethyl­enediamine‐N:N′]: resolution of structural anomalies resulting from the interpretation of vibrational spectra

The title structure, [ZnBr₂(C₂H₈N₂)], is made up of infinite –ZnBr₂–(en)–ZnBr₂–(en)– zigzag chains. Each repeat unit contains a trans ethyl­enedi­amine ligand [N—C—C—N ?179 (1)°], which bridges two approximately tetrahedral but crystallographically distinct Zn atoms. One Zn atom is bisected by a crystallographic twofold axis, whereas the other has mirror symmetry. Even though the crystal packing does not allow significant interaction between Zn and N atoms on adjacent chains, it does facilitate extensive inter­molecular N—H?Br hydrogen bonding (N?H 2.69–2.96 Å).     

Pentacarbonyl{tris[4‐(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]stannyl}manganese(I): an unexpected tetragonal structure

The title compound, [MnSn(C₇H₇O₂S)₃(CO)₅], is asymmetric but crystallizes in the highly symmetric tetragonal space group I. This is achieved without the need for any disorder, either around the Sn atom or in any of the methyl­sulfonyl groups. The environment around the Sn atom has the following geometry: Sn—Mn = 2.6564 (7) Å, mean Sn—C = 2.175 (5) Å, mean C—Sn—C = 103 (2)° and mean C—Sn—Mn = 115 (6)°. The crystal packing is assisted by weak Sn?O interactions between adjacent columns of mol­ecules, with the resulting geometry at Sn approaching highly distorted trigonal–bipyramidal.     

(E)‐2‐[2‐(1‐Naphthyl)­vinyl]‐3‐tosyl‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1,3‐benzo­thia­zole

The title compound, C₂₆H₂₁NO₂S₂, which consists of a benzo­thia­zole skeleton with α‐naphthyl­vinyl and tosyl groups at positions 2 and 3, respectively, was prepared by palladium–copper‐catalyzed heteroannulation. The E configuration of the mol­ecule about the vinyl C=C bond is established by the benzothiazole–naphthyl C—C—C—C torsion angle of 177.5 (4)°. The five‐membered heterocyclic ring adopts an envelope conformation with the Csp³ atom 0.380 (6) Å from the C₂NS plane. The two S—C [1.751 (4) and 1.838 (4) Å] and two N—C [1.426 (5) and 1.482 (5) Å] bond lengths in the thia­zole ring differ significantly.     

2‐Iodo‐N‐(3‐nitrobenzyl)aniline and 3‐iodo‐N‐(3‐nitrobenzyl)aniline exhibit entirely different patterns of supramolecular aggregation

In 2‐iodo‐N‐(3‐nitro­benzyl)­aniline, C₁₃H₁₁IN₂O₂, the mol­ecules are linked into a three‐dimensional structure by a combination of C—H?O hydrogen bonds, iodo–nitro interactions and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions, but N—H?O and C—H?π(arene) hydrogen bonds are absent. In the isomeric 3‐iodo‐N‐(3‐nitro­benzyl)­aniline, a two‐dimensional array is generated by a combination of N—H?O, C—H?O and C—H?π(arene) hydrogen bonds, but iodo–nitro interactions and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions are both absent.     

4-{[(1E)-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)methyl­idene]amino}-1,5-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-one

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₇N₃O₂, a strong intramolecular O—H⃛N hydrogen bond [N⃛O 2.607 (3), O—H 0.97 (3) and H⃛N 1.71 (3) Å, and O—H⃛N 153 (2)°] was observed, which leads to a unique phenol–imine tautomerism in the solid state. The C=N imine bond distance and the C—N—C bond angle [1.287 (2) Å and 121.7 (1)°, respectively] indicate the existence of this phenol–imine tautomer. In solution, the phenol–imine tautomer of the title free Schiff base ligand is dominant in both polar and non-polar solvents, as supported by ¹H NMR and UV–visible spectroscopic data.     

Ferrocene­carboxyl­ic acid–1,4‐di­aza­bi­cyclo­[2.2.2]­octane (2/1): sheets built from O—H⃛N and C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds

In the title compound, 2[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₆H₅O₂)]·C₆H₁₂N₂, the molecular components are linked into finite three‐component aggregates by strong O—H?N hydrogen bonds [O?N 2.578 (4) and 2.604 (5) Å; O—H?N 170 (5) and 174 (6)°]; these aggregates are further linked by C—H?O hydrogen bonds [C?O 3.327 (5)–3.401 (5) Å; C—H?O 149–157°] into continuous sheets in the form of (6,3) nets.     

1‐Methyl‐4‐nitraminopyridinium nitrate and 4‐nitraminopyridinium methanesulfonate

In the title compounds, C₆H₈N₃O₂⁺·NO₃^? and C₅­H₆­N₃­O₂⁺·­CH₃SO₃^?, respectively, the cations are almost planar; the twist of the nitr­amino group about the C—N and N—N bonds does not exceed 10°. The deviations from coplanarity are accounted for by intermolecular N—H?O interactions. The coplanarity of the NHNO₂ group and the phenyl ring leads to the deformation of the nitr­amino group. The C—N—N angle and one C—C—N angle at the junction of the phenyl ring and the nitr­amino group are increased from 120° by ca 6°, whereas the other junction C—C—N angle is decreased by ca 5°. Within the nitro group, the O—N—O angle is increased by ca 5° and one O—N—N angle is decreased by ca 5°, whereas the other O—N—N angle remains almost unchanged. The cations are connected to the anions by relatively strong N—H?O hydrogen bonds [shortest H?O separations 1.77 (2)–1.81 (3) Å] and much weaker C—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O separations 2.30 (2)–2.63 (3) Å].     

Poly[diaqua(μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ2N:N′)bis(μ‐cyanido‐κ2C:N)bis(cyanido‐κC)nickel(II)copper(II)]: a metal–organic cyanide‐bridged framework

The structure of the title compound, [NiCu(CN)₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n or [{Cu(H₂O)₂}(μ‐C₁₀H₈N₂)(μ‐CN)₂{Ni(CN)₂}]_n, was shown to be a metal–organic cyanide‐bridged framework, composed essentially of –Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu– chains (4,4′‐bpy is 4,4′‐bipyridine) linked by [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ anions. Both metal atoms sit on special positions; the Cu^II atom occupies an inversion center, while the Ni^II atom of the cyanometallate sits on a twofold axis. The 4,4′‐bpy ligand is also situated about a center of symmetry, located at the center of the bridging C—C bond. The scientific impact of this structure lies in the unique manner in which the framework is built up. The arrangement of the –Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu–4,4′‐bpy–Cu– chains, which are mutually perpendicular and non‐intersecting, creates large channels running parallel to the c axis. Within these channels, the [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ anions coordinate to successive Cu^II atoms, forming zigzag –Cu—N[triple‐bond]C—Ni—C[triple‐bond]N—Cu– chains. In this manner, a three‐dimensional framework structure is constructed. To the authors' knowledge, this arrangement has not been observed in any of the many copper(II)–4,4′‐bipyridine framework complexes synthesized to date. The coordination environment of the Cu^II atom is completed by two water molecules. The framework is further strengthened by O—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the water molecules and the symmetry‐equivalent nonbridging cyanide N atoms.     

Novel polyisobutylene/poly(dimethylsiloxane) bicomponent networks. I. Synthesis and characterization

The synthesis of novel polyisobutylene (PIB)/poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) bicomponent networks is described. The synthesis strategy (see Figure 1) was to prepare well-defined and -characterized allyl-tritelechelic polyisobutylenes [ϕ(PIB—C—C=C)₃] and SiH-ditelechelic poly(dimethylsiloxanes) (HSi–PDMS–SiH) and then crosslink these moieties by hydrosilation. The ϕ(PIB—C—C=C)₃ was prepared by living isobutylene polymerization followed by end-quenching with allyltrimethylsilane, whereas the HSi–PDMS–SiH was obtained by equilibrium polymerization of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and tetramethyldisiloxane. The detailed structures of the starting polymers were characterized by GPC and ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. A series of PIB/PDMS bicomponent networks of varying compositions and average molecular weights between crosslinks (M _c) of ∼ 20,000 g/mol were assembled. Optimum crosslinking conditions were defined in terms of H₂PtCl₆ catalyst concentration, nature of solvent, time, temperature, and stoichiometry of ∼ CH₂CH=CH₂/∼SiH groups, allowing for the convenient synthesis of well-defined model bicomponent networks. Swelling studies and elemental analysis confirm the correctness of the synthetic strategy. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 36: 1891–1899, 1998     

6,6′‐Di­methoxy‐2,2′‐[(1R,2R)‐cyclo­hexane‐1,2‐diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenol: three C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds generate a three‐dimensional framework

Molecules of the title compound, alternatively called (R,R)‐N,N′‐bis(3‐methoxysalicylidene)‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐diamine, C₂₂H₂₆N₂O₄, contain two intramolecular O—H⃛N hydrogen bonds and adopt a conformation with approximate twofold rotational symmetry. The mol­ecules are linked by three C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds [H⃛O = 2.45–2.55 Å, C⃛O = 3.329 (2)–3.398 (2) Å and C—H⃛O = 142–172°] into a continuous framework.     

Side‐chain conformations in the isomorphous polyfluorinated {4,4′‐bis[(2,2‐difluoroethoxy)methyl]‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′}dichloridopalladium and ‐platinum complexes

The polyfluorinated title compounds, [M Cl₂(C₁₆H₁₆F₄N₂O₂)] or [4,4′‐(HCF₂CH₂OCH₂)₂‐2,2′‐bpy]M Cl₂ [M = Pd, ( 1 ), and M = Pt, ( 2 )], have –C(H_α)₂OC(H_β)₂CF₂H side chains with H‐atom donors at the α and β sites. The structures of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are isomorphous, with the nearly planar (bpy)M Cl₂ molecules stacked in columns. Within one column, π‐dimer pairs alternate between a π‐dimer pair reinforced with C—H…Cl hydrogen bonds (α,α) and a π‐dimer pair reinforced with C—H_β…F(—C) interactions (abbreviated as C—H_β…F—C,C—H_β…F—C). The compounds [4,4′‐(CF₃CH₂OCH₂)₂‐2,2′‐bpy]M Cl₂ [M = Pd, ( 3 ), and M = Pt, ( 4 )] have been reported to be isomorphous [Lu et al. (2012). J. Fluorine Chem. 137 , 54–56], yet with disorder in the fluorous regions. The molecules of ( 3 ) [or ( 4 )] also form similar stacks, but with alternating π‐dimer pairs between the (α,β; α,β) and (β,β) forms. Through (C—)H…Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions, one molecule of ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )] is expanded into an aggregate of two inversion‐related π‐dimer pairs, one pair in the (α,α) form and the other pair in the (C—H_β…F—C,C—H_β…F—C) form, with the plane normals making an interplanar angle of 58.24 (3)°. Due to the demands of maintaining a high coordination number around the metal‐bound Cl atoms in molecule ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )], the ponytails of molecule ( 1 ) [or ( 2 )] bend outward; in contrast, the ponytails of molecule ( 3 ) [or ( 4 )] bend inward.     

Hypervalent organoselenium compounds stabilized by intramolecular coordination: synthesis and crystal structures

Two novel hypervalent selenium(IV) compounds stabilized by intramolecular interactions, namely 6‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐5H‐2,3‐dioxa‐2aλ⁴‐selenacyclopenta[hi]indene, C₁₄H₁₂O₂Se, 14 , and 5‐phenyl‐5,6‐dihydro‐4H‐benzo[c][1,2]oxaselenole‐7‐carbaldehyde, C₁₄H₁₂OSe₂, 15 , have been synthesized by the reaction of 2‐chloro‐1‐formyl‐3‐(hydroxymethylene)cyclohexene with in‐situ‐generated disodium diselenide (Na₂Se₂). The title compounds were characterized by FT–IR spectroscopy, ESI–MS, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. For 14 , there is whole‐molecule disorder, with occupancies of 0.605 (10) and 0.395 (10), a double bond between C and Se, and the five‐membered selenopentalene rings are coplanar. The packing is stabilized by π–π stacking interactions involving one of the five‐membered Se/C/C/C/O rings [centroid–centroid (Cg…Cg) distance = 3.6472 (18) Å and slippage = 1.361 Å], as well as C—H…π interactions involving a C—H group and the phenyl ring. In addition, there are bifurcated C—H…Se,O interactions which link the molecules into ribbons in the c direction. For 15 , the C—Se bond lengths are longer than those of 14 . The two five‐membered rings are coplanar. There are no π–π or C—H…π interactions; however, molecules are linked by C—H…O interactions into centrosymmetric dimers, with graph‐set notation R₂²(16).     

2‐Phenyl­malon­amide

In the title compound, C₉H₁₀N₂O₂, the amide groups are rotated out of the C(ONH₂)—C(HPh)—C(ONH₂) plane by ca 25–47° and the phenyl ring is almost perpendicular to this plane. The crystal structure is stabilized by intra‐ and intermolecular N—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

catena‐Poly­[[di‐μ‐benzoato‐κ4O:O′‐disilver(I)]‐μ‐N,N′‐bis(2‐fluoro­benzyl­idene)­butane‐1,4‐di­amine‐κ2N:N′]

The title complex, [Ag₂(C₇H₅O₂)₂(C₁₈H₁₈F₂N₂)]_n, is a dinuclear silver(I) compound with one inversion centre between pairs of Ag atoms and another at the mid‐point of the central C—C bond in the butane‐1,4‐diamine moiety. Each of the smallest repeat units consists of two silver(I) cations, two benzoate anions and one N,N′‐bis(2‐fluorobenzyl­idene)­butane‐1,4‐di­amine Schiff base ligand. Each Ag^I ion is three‐coordinated in a trigonal configuration by two O atoms from two benzoate anions and one N atom from a Schiff base ligand. The di‐μ‐benzoato‐disilver(I) moieties are linked by the bridging Schiff base ligand, giving zigzag polymeric chains with an [–Ag⋯Ag—N—C—C—C—C—N–]_n backbone running along the b axis.     

2,2′‐[2,3‐Di­hydro‐2‐(prop‐2‐enyl)‐1H‐isoindole‐1,3‐diyl­idene]bis(propane­di­nitrile)–tetra­thia­fulvalene (1/1), TCPI–TTF

The title complex, C₁₇H₉N₅·C₆H₄S₄, contains π‐deficient bis(di­nitrile) and TTF mol­ecules stacked alternately in columns along the a‐axis direction; the interplanar angle between the TTF molecule and the isoindolinyl C₄N[C(CN)₂]₂ moiety is 1.21 (4)°. The N‐allyl moiety in the TCPI mol­ecule is oriented at an angle of 87.10 (10)° with respect to the five‐membered C₄N ring, and the four C[triple‐bond]N bond lengths range from 1.134 (3) to 1.142 (3) Å, with C—C[triple‐bond]N angles in the range 174.3 (3)–176.9 (2)°. In the TTF system, the S—C bond lengths are 1.726 (3)–1.740 (3) and 1.751 (2)–1.763 (2) Å for the external S—C(H) and internal S—C(S) bonds, respectively.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐d‐galacto­pyran­osyl α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside (methyl α‐lactoside)

Methyl α‐lactoside, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁, (I), is described by glycosidic torsion angles ϕ (O5_gal—C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc) and ψ (C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc—C5_glc), which have values of −93.52 (13) and −144.83 (11)°, respectively, where the ring atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 is the anomeric C atom and C6 is the exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) C atom in both residues. The linkage geometry is similar to that observed in methyl β‐lactoside methanol solvate, (II), in which ϕ is −88.4 (4)° and ψ is −161.3 (4)°. As in (II), an inter­molecular O3_glc—H⋯O5_gal hydrogen bond is observed in (I). The hydroxy­methyl group conformation in both residues is gauche–trans, with torsion angles ω_gal (O5_gal—C5_gal—C6_gal—O6_gal) and ω_glc (O5_glc—C5_glc—C6_glc—O6_glc) of 69.15 (13) and 72.55 (14)°, respectively. The latter torsion angle differs substantially from that found for (II) [−54.6 (2)°; gauche–gauche]. Cocrystallization of methanol, which is hydrogen bonded to O6_glc in the crystal structure of (II), presumably affects the hydroxy­methyl conformation in the Glc residue in (II).     

N‐Chloro­acetyl‐β‐alanine

The β‐alanine residue of the title compound, C₅H₈ClNO₃, has a ggt folded conformation, which is mainly stabilized through intermolecular N—H⋯O=C (amide–acid) and O—H⋯O=C (acid–amide) hydrogen bonds. In addition, a cis conformation is found for the Cl—CH₂—C(=O)—NH torsion angle, which is associated with the presence of an intramolecular hydrogen bond.