Hydrogen‐bonded networks in crystals of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium perchlorate,hydrogen sulfate,dihydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen arsenate

Crystals of the title compounds, namely 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium perchlorate, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·ClO₄⁻, 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium hydrogen sulfate, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·HSO₄⁻, 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium dihydrogen phosphate, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·H₂PO₄⁻, and its isomorphic relative 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium dihydrogen arsenate, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·H₂AsO₄⁻, are built up from a nonplanar 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium cation and the respective anion linked together via N—H...O hydrogen bonds. Both arms of the cation are planar, but they are twisted with respect to one another around the central N atom. Ionic and extensive hydrogen‐bonding interactions join oppositely charged units into layers in the perchlorate, double layers in the hydrogen sulfate, and a three‐dimensional network in the dihydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen arsenate salts. This work demonstrates the usefulness of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiourea in crystal engineering for the formation of supramolecular networks with acids.     

Products of the interaction of (1‐diaminomethylene)thiourea with hydrofluoric acid

The salts 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium hydrogen difluoride, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·HF₂⁻, (I), and bis[1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium] hexafluoridosilicate, 2C₂H₇N₄S⁺·SiF₆²⁻, (II), have both been obtained from the reaction of (1‐diaminomethylene)thiourea (HATU) with hydrofluoric acid. Both compounds contain extensive networks of N—H...F hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen difluoride salt contains four independent asymmetric [HF₂]⁻ anions. In the hexafluoridosilicate salt, the centrosymmetric [SiF₆]²⁻ anion is distorted, although this distortion is not clearly correlated with the N—H...F hydrogen‐bonding network.     

Supramolecular motifs in the first structures of organic carboxylate salts of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiourea (HATU)

The structures of the first two organic carboxylate salts of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiourea (HATU), namely 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium formate, C₂H₇N₄S⁺·HCOO⁻, (I), and bis[1‐(diaminomethylene)thiouron‐1‐ium] oxalate dihydrate, 2C₂H₇N₄S⁺·C₂O₄²⁻·2H₂O, (II), in which the oxalate lies on a symmetry centre, possess different extended hydrogen‐bonding networks with different graph‐set motifs. The R₂²(8) motif present in (I) does not appear in (II), but an R₂¹(6) motif is present in both (I) and (II). Compound (I) has a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network, whereas (II) has a layered structure with layers joined by hydrogen‐bonding motifs that form R₄²(8) patterns. This work extends the known supramolecular structural data for HATU to include these organic carboxylates in addition to the previously characterized salts with inorganic acids.     

1‐Carboxymethyl‐3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium chloride 2‐(3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)acetate monohydrate: a crystal stabilized by imidazolium zwitterions

The title compound, C₆H₉N₂O₂⁺·Cl⁻·C₆H₈N₂O₂·H₂O, contains one 2‐(3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)acetate inner salt molecule, one 1‐carboxymethyl‐3‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium cation, one chloride ion and one water molecule. In the extended structure, chloride anions and water molecules are linked via O—H...Cl hydrogen bonds, forming an infinite one‐dimensional chain. The chloride anions are also linked by two weak C—H...Cl interactions to neighbouring methylene groups and imidazole rings. Two imidazolium moieties form a homoconjugated cation through a strong and asymmetric O—H...O hydrogen bond of 2.472 (2) Å. The IR spectrum shows a continuous D‐type absorption in the region below 1300 cm⁻¹ and is different to that of 1‐carboxymethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride [Xuan, Wang & Xue (2012). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 96 , 436–443].     

2,2′‐Bipyridinium(1+) bromide monohydrate

In the crystal structure of 2,2′‐bipyridinium(1+) bromide monohydrate, C₁₀H₉N₂⁺·Br⁻·H₂O, the cation has a cisoid conformation with an intramolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond. The cation also forms an N—H⋯O hydrogen bond to an adjacent water mol­ecule, which in turn forms O—H⋯Br⁻ hydrogen bonds to adjacent Br⁻ anions. In this way, a chain is formed extending along the b axis. Additional interactions (C—H⋯Br⁻ and π–π) serve to stabilize the structure further.     

Impact of the anion and chalcogen on the crystal structure and properties of 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐pyrimido(thio)nium halides

By the reaction of urea or thiourea, acetylacetone and hydrogen halide (HF, HBr or HI), we have obtained seven new 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐pyrimido(thio)nium salts, which were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, namely, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium bifluoride, C₆H₉N₂O⁺·HF₂^? or (dmpH)F₂H, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium bromide, C₆H₉N₂O⁺·Br^? or (dmpH)Br, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium iodide, C₆H₉N₂O⁺·I^? or (dmpH)I, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium iodide–urea (1/1), C₆H₉N₂O⁺·I^?·CH₄N₂O or (dmpH)I·ur, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium bifluoride–thiourea (1/1), C₆H₉N₂S⁺·HF₂^?·CH₄N₂S or (dmptH)F₂H·tu, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium bromide, C₆H₉N₂S⁺·Br^? or (dmptH)Br, and 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium iodide, C₆H₉N₂S⁺·I^? or (dmptH)I. Three HCl derivatives were described previously in the literature, namely, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium chloride, (dmpH)Cl, 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium chloride monohydrate, (dmptH)Cl·H₂O, and 4,6‐dimethyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium chloride–thiourea (1/1), (dmptH)Cl·tu. Structural analysis shows that in 9 out of 10 of these compounds, the ions form one‐dimensional chains or ribbons stabilized by hydrogen bonds. Only in one compound are parallel planes present. In all the structures, there are charge‐assisted N⁺—H…X^? hydrogen bonds, as well as weaker C_Ar⁺—H…X^? and π⁺…X^? interactions. The structures can be divided into five types according to their hydrogen‐bond patterns. All the compounds undergo thermal decomposition at relatively high temperatures (150–300 °C) without melting. Four oxopyrimidinium salts containing a π⁺…X^?…π⁺ sandwich‐like structural motif exhibit luminescent properties.     

Eight salt forms of sulfadiazine

Proton transfer to the sulfa drug sulfadiazine [systematic name: 4‐amino‐N‐(pyrimidin‐2‐yl)benzenesulfonamide] gave eight salt forms. These are the monohydrate and methanol hemisolvate forms of the chloride (2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium chloride monohydrate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·Cl⁻·H₂O, (I), and 2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium chloride methanol hemisolvate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·Cl⁻·0.5CH₃OH, (II)); a bromide monohydrate (2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium bromide monohydrate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·Br⁻·H₂O, (III)), which has a disordered water channel; a species containing the unusual tetraiodide dianion [bis(2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium) tetraiodide, 2C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·I₄²⁻, (IV)], where the [I₄]²⁻ ion is located at a crystallographic inversion centre; a tetrafluoroborate monohydrate (2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium tetrafluoroborate monohydrate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·BF₄⁻·H₂O, (V)); a nitrate (2‐{[(4‐azaniumylphenyl)sulfonyl]azanidyl}pyrimidin‐1‐ium nitrate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·NO₃⁻, (VI)); an ethanesulfonate {4‐[(pyrimidin‐2‐yl)sulfamoyl]anilinium ethanesulfonate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·C₂H₅SO₃⁻, (VII)}; and a dihydrate of the 4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate {4‐[(pyrimidin‐2‐yl)sulfamoyl]anilinium 4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate dihydrate, C₁₀H₁₁N₄O₂S⁺·HOC₆H₄SO₃⁻·2H₂O, (VIII)}. All these structures feature alternate layers of cations and of anions where any solvent is associated with the anion layers. The two sulfonate salts are protonated at the aniline N atom and the amide N atom of sulfadiazine, a tautomeric form of the sulfadiazine cation that has not been crystallographically described before. All the other salt forms are instead protonated at the aniline group and on one N atom of the pyrimidine ring. Whilst all eight species are based upon hydrogen‐bonded centrosymetric dimers with graph set R₂²(8), the two sulfonate structures also differ in that these dimers do not link into one‐dimensional chains of cations through NH₃‐to‐SO₂ hydrogen‐bonding interactions, whilst the other six species do. The chloride methanol hemisolvate and the tetraiodide are isostructural and a packing analysis of the cation positions shows that the chloride monohydrate structure is also closely related to these.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks in cytosinium succinate and cytosinium 4‐nitrobenzoate cytosine monohydrate

In cytosinium succinate (systematic name: 4‐amino‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium 3‐carboxypropanoate), C₄H₆N₃O⁺·C₄H₅O₄⁻, (I), the cytosinium cation forms one‐dimensional self‐assembling patterns by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonding, while in cytosinium 4‐nitrobenzoate cytosine monohydrate [systematic name: 4‐amino‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium 4‐nitrobenzoate 4‐aminopyrimidin‐2(1H)‐one solvate monohydrate], C₄H₆N₃O⁺·C₇H₄NO₄⁻·C₄H₅N₃O·H₂O, (II), the cytosinium–cytosine base pair, held together by triple hydrogen bonds, leads to one‐dimensional polymeric ribbons via double N—H...O hydrogen bonds. This study illustrates clearly the different alignment of cytosine molecules in the crystal packing and their ability to form supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks with the anions.     

2,4‐Diamino‐6‐methyl‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium trifluoroacetate

Crystals of the title compound, C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₂F₃O₂⁻, are built up of singly protonated 2,4‐diamino‐6‐methyl‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium cations and trifluoroacetate anions. The CF₃ group of the anion is disordered. The oppositely charged ions interact via almost linear N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a CF₃COO⁻...C₄H₈N₅⁺ unit. Two units related by an inversion centre interact through a pair of N—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming planar (CF₃COO⁻...C₄H₈N₅⁺...C₄H₈N₅⁺·CF₃COO⁻) aggregates that are linked by a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains running along the c axis.     

A solid‐state oxidation of 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate to 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate

The organic acid–base complex 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₃S⁻, was obtained from the corresponding 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate complex, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₂S⁻, by solid‐state oxidation in air. Comparison of the two crystal structures reveals similar packing arrangements in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c, with centrosymmetric 2:2 tetramers being connected by four strong N—H...O=S hydrogen bonds between the imine N atoms of two 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium bases and the O atoms of two acid molecules.     

Solid‐state architecture of saccharin salts of some diamines

Hydrazinium saccharinate, N₂H₅⁺·C₇H₄NO₃S⁻, crystallizes in a 1:1 ratio, while ethyl­ene­diaminium bis­(saccharinate), C₂H₁₀N₂²⁺·2C₇H₄NO₃S⁻, and butane‐1,4‐diaminium bis­(sac­charin­ate), C₄H₁₄N₂²⁺·2C₇H₄NO₃S⁻, form in a 1:2 cation–anion stoichiometry. The structures contain many strong hydrogen bonds of the N⁺—H⋯N⁻, N⁺—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N types, with auxiliary C—H⋯O inter­actions.     

Polar hydrogen‐bonded organic chains in 4,4′‐bipyrazolium bromide and perchlorate monohydrates

4,4′‐Bipyrazolium [or 4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)pyrazolium] bromide monohydrate, C₆H₇N₄⁺·Br⁻·H₂O, and 4,4′‐bipyrazolium perchlorate monohydrate, C₆H₇N₄⁺·ClO₄⁻·H₂O, have closely related layered structures involving tight stacks of antiparallel N—H⋯N hydrogen‐bonded polar bipyrazolium chains [N⋯N = 2.712 (3) and 2.742 (2) Å], which are crosslinked by hydrogen bonds with water mol­ecules and counter‐anions.     

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with 3‐nitrophthalic, 4‐nitrophthalic and 5‐nitroisophthalic acids

The structures of the anhydrous 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of the dye precursor aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline], namely isomeric 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐6‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (I), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 3‐carboxy‐5‐nitrobenzoate monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. In (I) the cation has longitudinal rotational disorder. All three compounds have substructures comprising backbones formed through strong head‐to‐tail carboxyl–carboxylate hydrogen‐bond interactions [graph set C(7) in (I) and (II), and C(8) in (III)]. Two‐dimensional sheet structures are formed in all three compounds by the incorporation of the 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium cations into the substructures, including, in the cases of (I) and (II), infinite H—N—H to carboxylate O—C—O group interactions [graph set C(6)], and in the case of (III), bridging through the water molecule of solvation. The peripheral alternating aromatic ring residues of both cations and anions give only weakly π‐interactive step features which lie between the sheets.     

Two salts of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid and 3‐aminopyridine

5‐Sulfosalicylic acid (5‐SSA) and 3‐aminopyridine (3‐APy) crystallize in the same solvent system, resulting in two kinds of 1:1 proton‐transfer organic adduct, namely 3‐aminopyridinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate monohydrate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O or 3‐APy·5‐SSA·H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous adduct, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻ or 3‐APy·5‐SSA, (II). Both compounds have extensively hydrogen‐bonded three‐dimensional layered polymer structures, with interlayer homo‐ and heterogeneous π–π interactions in (I) and (II), respectively.     

In‐house and synchrotron X‐ray diffraction studies of 2‐phenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline,protonated salts,complexes with gold(III) and copper(II), and an orthometallation product with palladium(II)

Different salts of the 2‐phenyl‐1,10‐phenanthrolin‐1‐ium cation, (pnpH)⁺, are obtained by reacting 2‐phenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline (pnp), C₁₈H₁₂N₂, (I), with a variety of anions, such as hexafluoridophosphate, C₁₈H₁₃N₂⁺·PF₆⁻, (II), trifluoromethanesulfonate, C₁₈H₁₃N₂⁺·CF₃SO₃⁻, (III), tetrachloridoaurate, (C₁₈H₁₃N₂)[AuCl₄], (IV), and bromide (as the dihydrate), C₁₈H₁₃N₂⁺·Br⁻·2H₂O, (V). Compound (I) crystallizes with Z′ = 2, with both independent molecules adopting a coplanar conformation. In (II)–(IV), a hydrogen bond exists between the cation and anion, while one of the lattice water molecules serves as a hydrogen‐bonded bridge between the cation and anion in (V). Reaction of (I) with HAuCl₄ gives the salt complex (IV); however, reaction with KAuCl₄ produces the monodentate complex trichlorido(2‐phenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κN¹⁰)gold(III), [AuCl₃(C₁₈H₁₂N₂)], (VI). Dichlorido(2‐phenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(II), [CuCl₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₂)], (VII), results from the reaction of CuCl₂·2H₂O and (I), in which the Cu^II center adopts a tetrahedrally distorted square‐planar geometry. The pendent phenyl ring twists to a bisecting position relative to the phenanthroline plane. The square‐planar Pd^II complex, bromido[2‐(phenanthrolin‐2‐yl)phenyl‐κ³C¹,N,N′]palladium(II), [PdBr(C₁₈H₁₁N₂)], (VIII), is obtained from the reaction of (I) with [PdCl₂(cycloocta‐1,5‐diene)], followed by addition of bromine. A coplanar geometry for the pendent ring is adopted as a result of the tridentate bonding motif.     

The acid adducts hydrazinium 2‐hydroxybenzoate–2‐hydroxybenzoic acid (1/1) and hydrazinium 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoate–3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid (1/1)

The title molecular salts, N₂H₅⁺·C₇H₅O₃⁻·C₇H₆O₃ and N₂H₅⁺·C₁₁H₇O₃⁻·C₁₁H₈O₃, are acid adducts containing a hydrazinium cation, one molecule of a deprotonated acid and one molecule of a neutral acid. The two compounds contain essentially identical hydrogen‐bond networks between the hydrazinium cation and the acid molecules, which define closely comparable two‐dimensional layers in the structures. The planes of the aromatic rings within both structures are approximately parallel and the layers are stacked with comparable intermolecular interactions.     

Products of the oxidation of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiourea with hydrogen peroxide

Two oxidation products of 1‐(diaminomethylene)thiourea (HATU) are reported, obtained from reactions with hydrogen peroxide at two different concentrations; these are 3,5‐diamino‐1,2,4‐thiadiazole, C₂H₄N₄S, (I), related to HATU by intramolecular N—S bond formation, and 1‐(diaminomethylene)uronium hydrogen sulfate, C₂H₇N₄O⁺·HSO₄⁻, (II). In (I), molecular hydrogen‐bonded chains could be distinguished, further organized in a herring‐bone‐like pattern. The structure of (II) is stabilized by an extensive network of N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, where hydrogen‐bonded anion chains and characteristic cation–anion motifs are present. The compounds are of importance not only with respect to crystal engineering, but also in the design of new synthetic routes to HATU transition metal complexes.     

The hydrochloride and hydrobromide salt forms of (S)‐amphetamine

Despite the high profile of amphetamine, there have been relatively few structural studies of its salt forms. The lack of any halide salt forms is surprising as the typical synthetic route for amphetamine initially produces the chloride salt. (S)‐Amphetamine hydrochloride [systematic name: (2S)‐1‐phenylpropan‐2‐aminium chloride], C₉H₁₄N⁺·Cl⁻, has a Z′ = 6 structure with six independent cation–anion pairs. That these are indeed crystallographically independent is supported by different packing orientations of the cations and by the observation of a wide range of cation conformations generated by rotation about the phenyl–CH₂ bond. The supramolecular contacts about the anions also differ, such that both a wide variation in the geometry of the three N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds formed by each chloride anion and differences in C—H...Cl contacts are apparent. (S)‐Amphetamine hydrobromide [systematic name: (2S)‐1‐phenylpropan‐2‐aminium bromide], C₉H₁₄N⁺·Br⁻, is broadly similar to the hydrochloride in terms of cation conformation, the existence of three N—H...X hydrogen‐bond contacts per anion and the overall two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheet motif. However, only the chloride structure features organic bilayers and Z′ > 1.     

Three‐dimensional networks in 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate

The two title proton‐transfer compounds, 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻, (I), and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, 2C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S²⁻, (II), are each organized into a three‐dimensional network by a combination of X—H...O (X = O, N or C) hydrogen bonds, and π–π and C—H...π interactions.     

Hydro­gen bonding in proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases

The crystal structures of quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate trihydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·3H₂O, (I), 8‐hydroxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate monohydrate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (II), 8‐amino­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate dihydrate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·2H₂O, (III), and 2‐carboxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂, (IV), four proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases, reveal in each the presence of variously hydrogen‐bonded polymers. In only one of these compounds, viz. (II), is the protonated quinolinium group involved in a direct primary N⁺—H⋯O(sulfonate) hydrogen‐bonding interaction, while in the other hydrates, viz. (I) and (III), the water mol­ecules participate in the primary intermediate interaction. The quinaldic acid (quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid) adduct, (IV), exhibits cation–cation and anion–adduct hydrogen bonding but no direct formal heteromolecular interaction other than a number of weak cation–anion and cation–adduct π–π stacking associations. In all other compounds, secondary interactions give rise to network polymer structures.