首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 375 毫秒
1.
2.
The direct catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of (Z)-α-dehydroamino boronate esters was realized. Using this approach, a class of therapeutically relevant alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters was easily synthesized in high yields with generally excellent enantioselectivities (up to 99% yield and 99% ee). The utility of the products has been demonstrated by transformation to their corresponding boronic acid derivatives by a Pd-catalyzed borylation reaction and an efficient synthesis of a potential intermediate of bortezomib. The clean, atom-economic and environment friendly nature of this catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation process would make this approach a new alternative for the production of alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters of great potential in the area of organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry.

The direct catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of (Z)-α-dehydroamino boronate esters was realized.

Since FDA approval of bortezomib1 for the treatment of multiple myeloma, chiral α-aminoboronic acids have been recognized as key pharmacophores for the design of proteasome inhibitors.2 The incorporation of chiral α-aminoboronic acid motifs at the C-terminal position of a peptide3 to develop potential clinical drug candidates has drawn increasing interest4 (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, chiral α-amidoboronic acids and their derivatives are useful synthetic building blocks for the stereospecific construction of chiral amine compounds.5 The biological and synthetic value of α-amidoboronates has led to considerable efforts for the development of efficient synthetic methods. However, up to now, limited transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric approaches have been reported. The widely used strategies to synthesize these compounds are stepwise Matteson homologation/N-nucleophilic replacement,6 borylation of imines,7 and alkene functionalization.8 Recently, two other elegant approaches, Ni-catalyzed decarboxylative borylation of α-amino acid derivatives9 and enantiospecific borylation of lithiated α-N-Boc species,10 were reported by the Baran and Negishi groups, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the majority of the methods relied on either stoichiometric amounts of chiral auxiliaries6,7a,b or substrate-control strategies9 and most of these methods enable the construction of aryl-substituted α-aminoboronates. Enantioselective methods to access unfunctionalized alkyl-substituted α-aminoboronic esters are still rarely developed and so far only two examples have been realized by the Miura8a and Scheidt7f groups, respectively. Considering that most therapeutically relevant α-amidoboronic acid fragments contain an alkyl subunit and the fact that the options for the synthesis of alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters in an enantioselective manner are still rare, the development of other distinct approaches would be highly desirable. Herein, we report a new alternative to access these compounds by catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of (Z)-α-dehydroamidoboronate esters. With this approach, the desired chiral alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters could be obtained in high yields and generally excellent enantioselectivities (up to 99% yield and 99% ee) with simple purification.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Selected inhibitors containing chiral alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic acids.Catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of olefins is an atom-economic, environmentally friendly and clean process for the synthesis of valuable pharmaceuticals, agricultural compounds and feedstock chemicals.11 Recently, hydrogenation of vinylboronic compounds has emerged for the preparation of chiral boronic compounds in a regiodefined manner.12,13 However, surprisingly α-dehydroamido boronate esters and their derivatives, as elegant precursors to access alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic compounds, have never been used as substrates in asymmetric hydrogenation and remain a challenging project. To our knowledge, only one efficient hydrogenation approach to (1-halo-1-alkenyl) boronic esters was reported for indirect synthesis of alkyl-substituted α-aminoboronic esters but it was accompanied by inevitable de-halogenated by-products14 (Scheme 1). Given the catalytic efficiency and atom economy of the hydrogenation method, the development of a new direct hydrogenation approach to construct these important chiral alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters would be very appealing.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Approaches towards the synthesis of chiral alkyl-substituted α-aminoboronic esters.The inspiration for our approach to the hydrogenation of α-dehydroamido boronates came from the molecular structures of relevant biologically active inhibitors containing alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic acid fragments. Due to the limited stability of free α-aminoboronic acids, an electron-withdrawing carboxylic N-substituent is often required.15 Thus, we envisaged that N-carboxyl protected α-dehydroamido boronate esters could serve as a potential precursor for the synthesis of alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronates through Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of the C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C bond16 (Fig. 1), a strategically distinct approach to the construction of unfunctionalized alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronic esters. However, challenges still remain, including: (1) how to synthesize α-dehydroamido boronates; (2) the facile transmetalation process of the starting materials leading to deboronated by-products in the hydrogenation process;17 (3) the unknown stability of α-amidoboronic compounds in the presence of a transition-metal catalyst and hydrogen molecules. As part of our continuous efforts to develop efficient hydrogenation approaches to construct valuable motifs,18 here we present the results of the investigation to address the aforementioned challenges.The desired aryl-substituted (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronates could be obtained by Cu-catalyzed regioselective hydroborylation of ynamide according to a previous report.19 However, different α/β-regioselectivity was observed for the preparation of alkyl-substituted (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronate esters and a new synthetic route was developed (Scheme 2, see the ESI for details). Of note, (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronate esters should be purified with deactivated silica gel,7c or else protodeborylation would occur readily with flash chromatography.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Synthetic route to (Z)-α-dehydroamino boronates.In order to check the feasibility of our hypothesis, three substrates were prepared with Rh(NBD)2BF4 and examined and our group prepared (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhos under 50 atm hydrogen pressure (Table 1). Gratifyingly, substrate 1b reacted smoothly to provide the desired product 2b in high yield and enantioselectivity (>99% conv., 98% ee, entry 2) whilst the reaction with substrate 1a yielded a mixture of deborylation products and 1c did not work at all (entries 1 and 3). Of note, we did not observe deborylation products with 1b under the current reaction conditions and we did not select (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronic acid 1a as the model substrate because of its poor solubility in most solvents. Then, a variety of chiral diphosphine ligands were investigated along with Rh(NBD)2BF4 and the results are shown in Table 1. In most cases, the reaction proceeded smoothly to furnish the desired products and the best results were obtained when (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhos was used as the ligand (entries 2 and 4–12). Poor results were obtained with axially bidentate phosphine ligands (entries 5, 6 and 9). (R,R)-QuinoxP* and (R,R)-Ph-BPE also gave good conversion with a slightly decreased ee whilst (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos exhibited poor results (entries 4, 7 and 10). Subsequent solvent screening revealed that the desired products could be obtained in most of the solvents and 1,2-DCE was the best solvent. (Entry 13, see the ESI).Condition optimization for catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation of 1a
EntrySubLigandConv.b (%)eec (%)
1d 1a (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhos89n.d.
2e 1b (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhos>9998
3 1c (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhosn.r.n.d.
4 1b (R,R)-QuinoxP*>9997
5 1b (S)-SegPhos>9917
6 1b (S)-BINAP>9910
7 1b (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos>993
8 1b (R,S)-Cy-JosiPhos>9914
9 1b (R)-BIPHEP>99−30
10 1b (R,R)-Ph-BPE>99−86
11 1b (S,S)-f-Binaphane>9961
12 1b (2S,4S)-BDPP>9959
13e,f,g 1b (Rc,Sp)-DuanPhos>99(99)99
Open in a separate windowaUnless otherwise mentioned, the reactions were performed with 1 (0.1 mmol), Rh(NBD)2BF4 (10 mol%), and a ligand (11 mol%) in 1.0 mL THF at 50 °C for 15 h.bDetermined by crude 1H NMR.cDetermined with chiral HPLC.dThe reaction was performed in iPrOH.eRh(NBD)2BF4 (1.0 mol%) and ligand (1.05 mol%) were used.fIsolated yield in parentheses.g1,2-DCE was used as the solvent. Pin = 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol; dan = 1,8-diaminonaphthalene.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, a series of (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronate esters were tested and the results are summarized in Table 2. All the substrates reacted smoothly to give the corresponding alkyl-substituted α-amidoboronates in high yields with good to excellent enantioselectivities (2b, 2d–2r, and 2u, 99% yield, 57–99% ee). Alkyl-substituted (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronate esters were well tolerated in the current reaction, providing the corresponding α-amidoboronates in high yields and excellent enantioselectivities (2d–2i, 99% yield, 96–99% ee). Aryl-substituted (Z)-α-dehydroamido boronate esters with electron-donating (2j–l, 2n and 2p–r) and withdrawing (2m and 2o) substituents could also give the desired products in excellent yield with excellent enantioselectivities (90–99% ee). The ortho-methyl-substituted substrate 1r reacted smoothly to give the desired product with excellent enantioselectivity, but the 2,6-dimethyl-substituted substrate 1z could not react at all. Functional groups such as ether, halo and benzyl were well tolerated in the current reaction (2k, 2l, 2m and 2o–q). Replacement of the N-substituents with acyclic carbamate was also tolerated but with a decreased ee (2u and 2z). Substrates containing a chiral oxazolidin-2-one unit bearing bulky Ph-substituents around the nitrogen and oxygen were also competent, yielding the desired products with good to excellent diastereoselectivities (2s, 2t, and 2v–y). Of note, the substrate 1s bearing an N-Ms substituent and the cyclic substrate 1t did not work in the current reaction. The absolute configuration of generated α-amidoboronates was assigned as (S) by X-ray crystallographic analysis of 2i (Scheme 3).20Substrate scope.a,b,c
Open in a separate windowaUnless otherwise mentioned, the reactions were performed with 1 (0.1 mmol), Rh(NBD)2BF4 (1.0 mol%), and a ligand (1.05 mol%) in 1.0 mL 1,2-DCE at 50 °C under 50 atm H2 for 15 h.bIsolated yield.cDetermined with chiral HPLC.dDetermined by crude 1H NMR.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Scale-up synthesis and synthetic utility.To demonstrate the utility of the products, a scale-up reaction (0.62 g) was successfully performed with 0.1 mol% catalytic loading, giving 2b in 99% yield and 98% ee, and 2b could be easily transformed to a more stable α-amidoborate 3b with KHF2,6d,21 followed by hydrolysis with TMSCl to yield α-amido boronic acid 4b in 46% yield,22 which could also be obtained from 2b by treating it with BCl3 in 84% yield, without loss of the optical purity.8b2m could easily be transformed to 4m in 68% yield by a Pd-catalyzed borylation reaction. Meanwhile, after hydrogenation of 1x to 2x′ and transformation of 2x′ to its trifluoroborate derivative 3x′, removal of the benzyl group of 3x′ with Pd/C under hydrogenation conditions23 yielded the primary α-aminoborate 4x in 62% yield in three steps, which could serve as a potential precursor15 to synthesize bortezomib.  相似文献   

3.
The bicyclic tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine subunit of gliovirin is synthesized through a diastereoselective copper-catalyzed cyclization of an N-hydroxyamino ester. Oxidative elaboration to the fully functionalized bicycle was achieved through a series of mild transformations. Central to this approach was the development of the first catalytic, enantioselective propargylation of an oxime to furnish a key N-hydroyxamino ester intermediate.

The bicyclic tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine subunit of gliovirin is synthesized through a diastereoselective copper-catalyzed cyclization of an N-hydroxyamino ester.

The fungal secondary metabolites gliovirin (2)1 and pretrichodermamides A (3)2 and E (4)3 are disulfide antibiotics that possess an unusual tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine (THO) core (Scheme 1). In addition to 2–4, several related oxazine natural products have been isolated, including the monothiolated peniciadametizine B (5);4 however, these oxazine-containing natural products are rare relative to the biosynthetically related diketopiperazine natural products, hundreds of which have been isolated to date.5 In addition to their oxazine cores, 2–4 are unusual in that their disulfide linkages are joined to the carbon framework at C4 and C12, in contrast to the more common epipolythiodiketopiperazines (ETPs) such as gliotoxin (1).6 These fungal metabolites are proposed to be formed through thiolation of simple cyclic dipeptides followed by oxidative elaboration of the peripheral functionality.7 Perhaps because of the synthetic challenge posed by the combined oxazine and disulfide motifs, there have been no syntheses of gliovirin (2) or the related compounds 3 and 4 to date.Open in a separate windowScheme 1PTP isomerism: gliovirin and related natural products.Whereas there are no syntheses of 2, syntheses of related dihydro-1,2-oxazine (DHO) natural products, including trichodermamide A (6), have been reported by the groups of Joullié,8 Zakarian,9 and Larionov.10 These efforts relied upon cycloaddition chemistry or pericyclic rearrangement to install the DHO cores. As part of our larger program targeting the synthesis of polysulfide natural products,11,12 we envisioned a distinct approach to 2 that would involve late-stage diketopiperazine and disulfide formation, thereby reducing the synthetic challenge to that of preparing key THO 7 (Scheme 2). Oxazine 7 was expected to be accessible from 8avia epoxidation, desaturation, and functional group interconversion.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Retrosynthetic analysis of tetrahydro-1,2-oxazine 7.In a key synthetic step, the bicyclic THO 7 would be constructed by an intramolecular oxidative cyclization of N-hydroxydihydrophenylalanine derivative 10. For the preparation of 10, we considered two approaches: (1) N-oxidation of the corresponding dihydrophenylalanine 9, or (2) initial installation of the N–O bond followed by construction of the cyclohexan-1,3-diene from the alkyne of 11a. Given concerns about potential challenges of N-oxidation in the presence of the sensitive 1,3-cyclohexadiene motif, we elected to pursue a route where 10 would be accessed from α-propargyl N-hydroxyamino acid 11a by an enyne metathesis reaction.Having identified 11a as an intermediate on route to 7, a method to prepare this compound in enantioenriched form was desired. The most direct route to 11a was envisioned to be an enantioselective propargylation of N-siloxyglyoxalate 12 (see Table 1). However, no examples of catalytic asymmetric addition of allyl nor propargyl nucleophiles to similar oxime substrates were found in the literature. The most promising lead was from Hanessian and coworkers, in which an excess of a chiral allylzinc reagent was added to an oxime.13 However, this method had not been extended to the corresponding propargylation.Optimization of Cu-catalyzed oxime propargylationa
EntryB(OR2)2[Cu], LYieldb (%)eec (%)
1Bgly (13a)Cu(CO2i-Pr)2, L1d263
2Bgly (13a)Cu(MeCN)4BF4, L2d772
3Bgly (13a)Cu(MeCN)4BF4, L3d7030
4Bgly (13a)Cu(MeCN)4BF4, L4d1180
5Bgly (13a)Cu(MeCN)4BF4, L5d2482
6Bgly (13a)Cu(MeCN)4BF4, L53095
7Bgly (13a)[Cu(L5)(MeCN)2]BF45092
8Bneo (13b)e[Cu(L5)(MeCN)2]BF48796
Open in a separate windowaReactions conducted under inert atmosphere on 0.05 mmol scale for 24 h.bDetermined by 1H NMR versus an internal standard.cDetermined by SFC using chiral stationary phase.dLi(Ot-Bu) (9.5 mol%) was added to the reaction.e2.0 equivalents used in place of 1.4 equivalents.Although there was no direct precedent for the catalytic asymmetric propargylation of oximes, we were inspired to pursue this approach by recent studies describing Cu-catalyzed asymmetric propargylation of imines.14–16 We began by investigating the ability of chiral Cu complexes to catalyze the reaction between glyoxalate-derived oxime 12b and allenyl boronate 13a. Bidentate bisphosphines gave promising levels of enantioinduction, although the reactions produced 11b in very low yield (Table 1, entries 1–2).17 In comparison, monodentate phosphoramidite ligands (e.g.L3) provided 11b in improved yield, but with modest enantioselectivity (entry 3).We hypothesized that the improved yield observed with the use of phosphoramidite ligands resulted from their increased ability to act as π-acceptors.18 It was envisioned that electron-deficient bis-phosphines would combine the benefits of greater π-acceptor ability to increase catalyst turnover while retaining the conformational rigidity of a bidentate ligand to promote asymmetric induction.19 Consistent with this hypothesis, fluorinated, commercially available, bisphosphines including DIFLUORPHOS (L4, entry 4) and BTFM-GARPHOS (L5, entry 5) both gave higher yields of 11b, while also improving the enantioinduction.In contrast to many metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of boronates, a series of control experiments demonstrated that co-catalytic base was not required, and in fact, omitting base from the reaction led to an improvement in yield and ee (entry 6, Table 1). Use of neopentyl boronate 13b further improved the yield. Although ester 12b was used for the optimization process (due to the aryl UV chromophore aiding ee assay development), for the purpose of the synthesis, ethyl ester 11a was accessed in similarly high yield and ee from N-siloxyglyoxalate 12a (Scheme 3).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Realization of proposed oxidative cyclization. aenantiomeric excess determined from 14, following benzoylation, by SFC with a chiral stationary phase.Concomitant to the development of the enantioselective propargylation shown in Table 1, we investigated the elaboration of compound 14, as a racemate, to oxazine 7. Initial attempts to generate the desired 1,3-cyclohexadiene 15a through enyne metathesis proceeded in low yield due to catalyst deactivation and alkyne oligomerization; however, slow addition of 14 to a solution of 1,5-cyclooctadiene and second generation Hoveyda–Grubbs catalyst (Mes-HGII) in benzene produced the desired product, 15, in excellent yield (Scheme 3).20With access to N-hydroxydihydrophenylalanine derivative 15a, we investigated the formation of the THO motif by an oxidative cyclization. The intramolecular oxidative radical addition of hydroxamic acids to generate cyclic hydroxamates was first observed by Perkins21 and later systematically studied by Alexanian.22–24 Furthermore, during the course of our work, the intermolecular addition of phthalimide N-oxyl radical (PINO) to activated alkenes was reported to be initiated by base metal catalysis, visible light, or conventional radical initiators.25–28 While this reactivity encouraged us, there were three issues that remained uncertain: (a) the regioselectivity of cyclization across the diene (i.e. 5-exo vs. 6-endo); (b) the diastereoselectivity of the C–O bond formation with respect the adjacent stereocenter; and (c) whether N-alkylhydroxamic acids would engage in similar reactivity previously observed in N-arylhydroxamic acids. With our cyclization substrate 15a in hand we found that following in situ deprotection, silica-mediated autooxidation provided a mixture of allylic hydroperoxides 16 which could be converted to the corresponding enone 8 through a Kornblum–DeLaMare work-up.29 Under these conditions, the hydroxamic acid exhibits good selectivity for 6-endo-trig cyclization, presumably due to the stability of the intermediate allylic radical.The desired syn-diastereomer 8a was formed as the major product, albeit in modest diastereoselectivity. Eager to improve the dr, we screened a series of copper-diamine catalysts previously studied as copper monooxygenase mimics.30 To our delight, Cu(TMEDA)2(BF4)2 not only improved the diastereoselectivity, but also catalyzed the reaction at lower temperatures in higher combined yield of the 6-endo products.31 When an N-acetylhydroxamic acid (8b) is subjected to the optimal conditions, the dr improves to 13 : 1. The selectivity for the syn diastereomer in these reactions is consistent with related conformationally-controlled selectivity in cyclic amides,32 where the α-substituent adopts a pseudo-axial disposition to alleviate developing A1,3 strain in the chair-like transition state for cyclization.33 Although THO 8b (R = Ac) was formed with higher diastereoselectivity, this compound was unstable to further elaboration. As a result, the more stable N-benzoyl THO 8a was used for further elaboration to fully functionalized 22.With access to the desired bicyclic THO, our efforts turned to parlaying the newly installed enone to the oxidation pattern found in 2. To our dismay, we found that traditional nucleophilic epoxidation conditions (e.g. NaOH, H2O2) led to complete decomposition of enone 8a, while other oxidants, such as DMDO, returned starting material. After an extensive survey of the literature, we found promising reactivity using hydrogen peroxide and sodium bicarbonate, which presumably generates a peroxycarbonate species in situ.34 Further optimization found that use of sodium hypochlorite as the oxidant, in combination with catalytic CrCl3, provided 17 in good yield as a single diastereomer.Initial attempts to desaturate epoxy ketone 17 by using classical Saegusa–Ito conditions or Tsuji-type oxidations of the corresponding silyl enol ethers were unsuccessful. In contrast, ketone 17 underwent smooth desaturation using conditions adapted from a recent report by White and coworkers,35 in which a Lewis acidic palladium catalyst enables in situ enolization and α-palladation. Under these conditions, epoxy enone 18 can be isolated directly in 67% yield.At this stage, elaboration of 18 to 20b was initially envisioned to proceed by diastereoselective ketone reduction followed by 1,3-transposition of the allylic alcohol (Scheme 4).36 Unfortunately, efforts to effect this strategy, or related approaches involving alkene formation and allylic oxidation, proved unsuccessful. As an alternate approach, we envisioned that a bis-epoxyketone (i.e.19), which could potentially undergo chemoselective Wharton rearrangement to the desired allylic alcohol. To this end, treatment of enone 18 with sodium hypochlorite in 1,4-dioxane provided bis-epoxy enone 19 in high yield as a single diastereomer. Addition of 1.0 equiv. anhydrous hydrazine in the presence of catalytic benzoic acid with careful control of the temperature gave a mixture of isomers 20a and 20b in 33% yield. Unfortunately, efforts to further improve the efficiency of this reaction were unfruitful. Nonetheless, when the mixture of isomers was treated with the bulky, Lewis acidic silylating reagent TBSOTf, the corresponding secondary allylic silyl ether was as isolated exclusively.37 When unreacted 20a, recovered from the reaction mixture, was subjected to neutral florisil purification a mixture of 20a and 20b were recovered. Taken together, these data might suggest that 20a and 20b can interconvert through an unusual vinylogous Payne rearrangement under Lewis acidic conditions.38 Finally, chemoselective cleavage of the N-benzoyl protecting group revealed 22,39 our desired substrate for subsequent late stage diketopiperazine formation and thiolation.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Synthesis of oxazine 22.  相似文献   

4.
Ru-catalysed oxidative coupling of allylsilanes and allyl esters with activated olefins has been developed via isomerization followed by C(allyl)–H activation providing efficient access to stereodefined 1,3-dienes in excellent yields. Mild reaction conditions, less expensive catalysts, and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity ensure universality of the reaction. In addition, the unique power of this reaction was illustrated by performing the Diels–Alder reaction, and enantioselective synthesis of highly functionalized cyclohexenone and piperidine and finally synthetic utility was further demonstrated by the efficient synthesis of norpyrenophorin, an antifungal agent.

Ru-catalysed oxidative coupling of allylsilanes and allyl esters with activated olefins has been developed via isomerization followed by C(allyl)–H activation providing efficient access to stereodefined 1,3-dienes in excellent yields.

1,3-Dienes not only are widespread structural motifs in biologically pertinent molecules but also feature as a foundation for a broad range of chemical transformations.1–14 Indeed, these conjugated dienes serve as substrates in many fundamental synthetic methodologies such as cycloaddition, metathesis, ene reactions, oxidoreduction, or reductive aldolization. It is well-understood that the geometry of olefins often influences the stereochemical outcome and the reactivity of reactions involving 1,3-dienes.15 Hence, a plethora of synthetic methods have been developed for the stereoselective construction of substituted 1,3-dienes.16–24 The past decade has witnessed a huge advancement in the field of metal-catalyzed C–H activation/functionalization.25–27 Although, a significant amount of work in the field of C(alkyl)–H and C(aryl)–H activation has been reported; C(alkenyl)–H activation has not been explored conspicuously, probably due to the complications caused by competitive reactivity of the alkene moiety, which can make chemoselectivity a significant challenge. Over the past few years, several different palladium-based protocols have been developed for C(alkenyl)–H functionalization, but the reactions are generally limited to employing conjugated alkenes, such as styrenes,28–31 acrylates/acrylamides,32–36 enamides,37 and enol esters/ethers.38,39 To date, only a few reports have appeared in the literature for expanding this reactivity towards non-conjugated olefins, which can be exemplified by camphene dimerization,40 and carboxylate-directed C(alkenyl)–H alkenylation of 1,4-cyclohexadienes.41 In 2009, Trost et al. reported a ruthenium-catalyzed stereoselective alkene–alkyne coupling method for the synthesis of 1,3-dienes.42 The same group also reported alkene–alkyne coupling for the stereoselective synthesis of trisubstituted ene carbamates.43 A palladium catalyzed chelation control method for the synthesis of dienes via alkenyl sp2 C–H bond functionalization was described by Loh et al.44 Recently, Engle and coworkers reported an elegant approach for synthesis of highly substituted 1,3-dienes from two different alkenes using an 8-aminoquinoline directed, palladium(ii)-mediated C(alkenyl)–H activation strategy.45 Allyl and vinyl silanes are known as indispensable nucleophiles in synthetic chemistry.46 Alder ene reactions of allyl silanes with alkynes are reported for the synthesis of 1,4-dienes.47 Innumerable methods are known for the preparation of both allyl and vinyl silanes48–52 but limitations are associated with many of the current protocols, which impedes the synthesis of unsaturated organosilanes in an efficient manner. Silicon-functionalized building blocks are used as coupling partners in the Hiyama reaction53 and are easily converted into iodo-functionalized derivatives (precursor for the Suzuki cross-coupling reaction), but there is little attention given for the synthesis of functionalized vinyl silanes. Herein, we report a general approach for the stereoselective synthesis of trisubstituted 1,3-dienes by the Ru-catalyzed C(sp3)–H functionalization reaction of allylsilanes (Scheme 1).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Highly stereoselective construction of 1,3-dienes.In 1993, Trost and coworkers reported an elegant method for highly chemoselective ruthenium-catalyzed redox isomerization of allyl alcohols without affecting the primary and secondary alcohols and isolated double bonds.54,55 Inspired by the potential of ruthenium for such isomerization of double bonds in allyl alcohols, we sought to identify a ruthenium-based catalytic system that can promote isomerization of olefins in allylsilanes followed by in situ oxidative coupling with an activated olefin to form substituted 1,3-dienes. We initiated our studies by choosing trimethylallylsilane 1a and acrylate 2a by using a commercially available [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 catalyst in the presence of AgSbF6 as an additive and co-oxidant Cu(OAc)2 in 1,2-DCE at 100 °C. Interestingly, it resulted into direct formation of (2E,4Z)-1,3-diene 3aa as a single isomer in 55% yield. It is likely that this reaction occurs by C(allyl)–H activation of the π-allyl ruthenium complex followed by oxidative coupling with the acrylate and leaving the silyl group intact (Table 1). π-Allyl ruthenium complex formation may be highly favorable due to the α-silyl effect which stabilizes the carbanion forming in situ in the reaction.56 Next, the regioselective C–H insertion of vinyl silanes could be controlled by stabilization of the carbon–metal (C–M) bond in the α-position to silicon. This stability arises due to the overlapping of the filled carbon–metal orbital with the d orbitals on silicon or the antibonding orbitals of the methyl–silicon (Me–Si) bond.57 The stereochemistry of the diene was established by 1D and 2D spectroscopic analysis of the compound 3aa. To quantify the C–H activation mediated coupling efficiency, an extensive optimization study was conducted (allylsilanes followed by in situ oxidative coupling with an activated olefin to form substituted 1,3-dienes). The change of solvents from 1,2-DCE to t-AmOH, DMF, dioxane, THF or MeCN did not give any satisfactory result, rather a very sluggish reaction rate or decomposition of starting materials was observed in each case (entry 2–6).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryAdditive (20 mol%)Oxidant (2 equiv.)SolventYieldb (%)
1AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2DCE55
2AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2t-AmOH10
3AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2DMF0
4AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2Dioxane8
5AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2THF21
6AgSbF6Cu(OAc)2MeCN0
7cAgSbF6Cu(OAc)2DCE35
8dAgSbF6Cu(OAc)2DCE82
9eAgSbF6Cu(OAc)2DCE45
10dAg2CO3Cu(OAc)2DCE0
11dAgOAcCu(OAc)2DCE20
12dAgSbF6DCE0
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 1a (0.24 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), additive (20 mol%) and oxidant (2 equiv.) at 100 °C in a specific solvent (2.0 mL), under argon, for 16 h.bIsolated yields are of product 3aa.cThe reaction was performed at 120 °C.dThe reaction was performed at 80 °C.eThe reaction was performed at 60 °C. t-AmOH – tertiary amyl alcohol, DMF – N,N-dimethylformamide, DCE – 1,2-dichloroethane.The increase of temperature from 100 °C to 120 °C resulted in the formation of diene in lower yield (entry 7). To our delight, it was found that a substantial enhancement in the yield (82%) was observed when the reaction was performed at 80 °C (entry 8). In particular, this was found to be the best reaction condition since further lowering of the temperature led to noteworthy attenuation of the reaction rate and yield (entry 9). Interestingly, the reaction was not efficient, when AgSbF6 was replaced with other additives, such as Ag2CO3 and AgOAc. It was also observed that, co-oxidant Cu(OAc)2 is necessary for the success of this reaction (entry 12).With these optimized conditions in hand, various allyl sources and acrylates have been tested (Table 2). It was found that a variety of acrylates 2 bearing alkyl and sterically crowded cyclic substituents successfully underwent the coupling reaction with allyl silane 1a to afford corresponding silyl substituted (2E,4Z)-1,3-dienes in good yields (3aa–3af). Similarly, dimethyl benzylallylsilane 1b reacted smoothly with acrylates such as methyl, isobutyl and n-butyl to generate desired dienes 3ba, 3bb and 3bc in 83%, 85% and 82% yield respectively. Interestingly, sterically crowded, tert-butyldimethyl allylsilane 1c showed its reactivity towards the coupling reaction with n-butyl acrylate to provide required diene 3cb in 80% yield. It is worth mentioning that allylsilanes 1a and 1b also exhibited their coupling reactivity with phenyl vinyl sulfone and successfully generated corresponding 1,3-dienes 3ag and 3bg in 78% and 76% yield respectively. When tert-butyldiphenylallylsilane 1d was subjected to the coupling reaction with methyl acrylate 2a, end–end coupling product 3da was isolated in 68% yield. This may be attributed to the steric crowding offered by bulky groups on silicon which prevents allyl to vinyl isomerization.Substrate scope for oxidative coupling of allylsilanes with acrylates and vinyl sulfonesa
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 1 (0.24 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%) and Cu(OAc)2·H2O (2 equiv.) at 80 °C in 1,2-dichloroethane (2.0 mL), under argon, 16 h.bIsolated yields are of product 3. TMS – trimethylsilyl, TBDMS – tertiarybutyldimethyl silyl.To extend the substrate scope of the reaction, we next examined the scope of allylesters by employing 2a as the coupling partner. First, we carried out the coupling reaction between allyl ester derivative 4a and methyl acrylate 2a under standard conditions. To our delight, a single isomer of acetate substituted (2E,4Z)-1,3-diene 5aa was isolated with a good yield (75%) (Table 3). This result may be extremely unusual due to the weak thermodynamic driving force for the double bond migration of allyl esters and tendency of many metal catalysts to insert themselves into the C(allyl)–O bond to form a stable carboxylate complex.58 Even for unsubstituted allyl esters very few reports of double bond migrations exist.59–62 It is worth mentioning that unlike the Tsuji–Trost reaction,63–65 the C(allyl)–O bond doesn''t break to form the π-allyl palladium complex as an electrophile, instead it forms a nucleophilic π-allylruthenium complex (umpolung reactivity) keeping the acetate group intact, which further reacts with an electrophile. The stereochemistry of the diene was established by 1D and 2D spectroscopic analysis of the compound 5ga and also by comparison of spectroscopic data with those of an authentic compound.66 Next we turned our attention to expand the scope of the coupling reaction between various acrylates and allyl esters. It was found that a variety of allyl esters bearing alkyl substituents on the carbonyl carbon could provide moderate to good yields of the corresponding stereodefined (2E,4Z)-1,3,4-trisubstituted 1,3-dienes successfully. As can be seen from Table 2, alkyl substituents (4b–4d) had little influence on the yields (65–75%). Gratifyingly, we noticed that the presence of a bulky substituent in 4 also showed its viability towards the coupling reaction, albeit with modest yields (5ea & 5fa). Also, various acrylate derivatives reacted smoothly to generate the 1,3-dienes in excellent yield. A simple allyl acetate 4g reacted with a series of different acrylates 2 to afford the desired products in good yields.Substrate scope for oxidative coupling of various allyl esters with different acrylates and vinyl sulfonesa
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 4 (0.24 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%) and Cu(OAc)2·H2O (2 equiv.) at 80 °C in 1,2-dichloroethane (2.0 mL), under argon, 16 h.bIsolated yields are of product 5.Several acrylates such as methyl-, ethyl-, n-butyl-, isobutyl-, n-heptyl-, cyclohexylmethyl-, benzyl-, etc. were tested and good to very good yields of the products were obtained. Also, gram scale synthesis of 5gh (1.35 g) by the reaction of acetate 4g with 2h gave identical results in terms of yield (69%) and diastereoselectivity, indicating the robustness and practicality of this method. Markedly, a C2-symmetric diacrylate (2e) also reacted with allyl acetate to form a mono-coupled product 5ge, though in a somewhat lower yield. In contrast to the allyl esters, the coupling was not affected by the steric bulk of the acrylate substituents as depicted in Table 3. Even the borneol derivative 2j and menthol derivative 2l, which can offer considerable steric hindrance, were found to be equally effective in the formation of 5gj and 5gl in very good yields. A somewhat reduced yield of the product 5gm was observed while using phenyl acrylate (2m) perhaps due to competitive reactive sites. Interestingly, the versatility of this methodology was not restricted only to acrylates, since phenyl vinyl sulfone was also found to be equally efficient for oxidative C–H functionalization with different allyl esters and a successful C–C coupling reaction was observed in each case with moderate yield and excellent diastereoselectivity.Interestingly treatment of allylsilanes under standard reaction conditions in the absence of an acrylate coupling partner led to isomerization of various allylsilanes to afford corresponding vinylsilanes 6b–6e in excellent yields (Scheme 2a). When allylsilane 1d was subjected to isomerization in the presence of CD3CO2D, a significant amount of deuterium scrambling at the α-position (>20%) as well as at the methyl group (>45%) was observed in corresponding vinylsilane, indicating that the isomerization step is reversible and the rate determining step (Scheme 2b). It is also observed that when vinylsilane 6b was made to react with methyl acrylate 2a under standard conditions, it successfully underwent highly regioselective C–H activation and afforded coupling product 3b′a in 80% yield (Scheme 2c). This result confirms that the coupling reaction proceeds via vinyl silane intermediate 6.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Isomerization of allylsilanes and deuterium study.It is delightful to mention that diene 3aa successfully underwent the Diels–Alder reaction with N-phenyl maleimide 7 in toluene at 80 °C, to afford single isomer 8 in 70% yield which ensures the pragmatism of the method (Scheme 3). The unique power of this ruthenium-catalyzed C–H functionalization strategy is illustrated by the late-stage diversification of the diene 5gh, to a very reactive Michael acceptor 9 (conventional route for preparation of 9 requires in situ oxidation of α-hydroxyketones using 10 equiv. MnO2 followed by the Wittig reaction, which generates a superstoichiometric amount of phosphine waste)67,68via selective hydrolysis of the acetate group, which is useful in the synthesis of ester-thiol 10,69 cyclohexenone 11 and polysubstituted piperidine 12 (ref. 70) (Scheme 4). Thus the Micheal acceptor 9 on reaction with thiophenol generated compound 10 in excellent yield and high regioselectivity. On the other hand compound 9 on reaction with heptanal in the presence of Hayashi–Jørgensen''s catalyst afforded the Michael adduct 13 in 72% yield and excellent diastereoselectivity. Keto-aldehyde 13 was converted to highly substituted cyclohexenone 11 and piperidine 12.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Application to the Diels–Alder reaction.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Application to the organocatalytic Michael addition reaction.The potential of this Ru-catalysed reaction was further demonstrated by norpyrenophorin synthesis.71–74 Norpyrenophorin 14 is a synthetic 16-membered lactone which has essentially the same physiological activity as the natural fungicide pyrenophorin 15 and the antibiotic vermiculin 16.73 A brief retrosynthetic analysis revealed that the dimeric macrocycle 14 could be dissected into monomer 17 which could be easily accessed from oxidative coupling of 2a with 18 using the C–H activation reaction (Scheme 5). Ruthenium catalysed oxidative coupling of symmetric allylester 18 with 2a generated the key intermediate 19 in 32% yield. Selective hydrolysis of acetyl enolate 19 was accomplished by the treatment with K2CO3 in methanol to provide 20 in 70% yield. In accordance with some previously reported studies, the active ketone functionality of 20 was protected as ketal by treatment with ethylene glycol in refluxing benzene to afford substrate 21. Selective hydrolysis of acetate was achieved using Bu2SnO to generate alcohol 22 and finally, aluminium–selenium adduct mediated72 ring closing lactonization followed by deketalization ensured the completion of synthesis of 14 in 23% yield (two steps) (Scheme 6). A similar type of dimerization reaction could be envisioned to synthesize the natural products pyrenophorin 15 and vermiculin 16.Open in a separate windowScheme 5Retrosynthetic analysis of norpyrenophorin.Open in a separate windowScheme 6Synthesis of norpyrenophorin.Based on the above result and previous report, a plausible mechanism for this oxidative coupling reaction is depicted in Scheme 7. The catalytic cycle is initiated by substrate 4g coordination to in situ generated reactive cationic ruthenium complex [Ru(OAc)L]+ A, followed by weakly coordinating ester group directed C–H activation of allyl ester to give a π-allyl ruthenium intermediate C, which again would undergo isomerization to produce intermediate D. In the case of allyl silanes, an α-silyl effect might play an important role for the isomerisation of allylsilanes to vinylsilanes via the silylated allyl anion.56 Regioselective C–H activation of in situ generated vinyl acetate would give intermediate E. Induction of stability to the carbon–metal bond by the silyl group favours regioselective C–H insertion in the case of vinyl silanes.57 Coordination followed by 1,4-addition of vinyl ruthenium species to the activated olefins (acrylate, 2a) would generate intermediate G, which would further undergo β-hydride elimination to provide a single isomer of 1,3-diene H and intermediate I could undergo reductive elimination followed by reoxidation of in situ forming Ru(0) species in the presence of Cu(OAc)2 to regenerate the reactive ruthenium(ii) complex A for the next catalytic cycle.Open in a separate windowScheme 7Plausible reaction mechanism.  相似文献   

5.
Palladium-catalyzed regioselective di- or mono-arylation of o-carboranes was achieved using weakly coordinating amides at room temperature. Therefore, a series of B(3,4)-diarylated and B(3)-monoarylated o-carboranes anchored with valuable functional groups were accessed for the first time. This strategy provided an efficient approach for the selective activation of B(3,4)–H bonds for regioselective functionalizations of o-carboranes.

B–H: site-selective B(3,4)–H arylations were accomplished at room temperature by versatile palladium catalysis enabled by weakly coordinating amides.

o-Carboranes, icosahedral carboranes – three-dimensional arene analogues – represent an important class of carbon–boron molecular clusters.1 The regioselective functionalization of o-carboranes has attracted growing interest due to its potential applications in supramolecular design,2 medicine,3 optoelectronics,4 nanomaterials,5 boron neutron capture therapy agents6 and organometallic/coordination chemistry.7 In recent years, transition metal-catalyzed cage B–H activation for the regioselective boron functionalization of o-carboranes has emerged as a powerful tool for molecular syntheses. However, the 10 B–H bonds of o-carboranes are not equal, and the unique structural motif renders their selective functionalization difficult, since the charge differences are very small and the electrophilic reactivity in unfunctionalized o-carboranes reduces in the following order: B(9,12) > B(8,10) > B(4,5,7,11) > B(3,6).8 Therefore, efficient and selective boron substitution of o-carboranes continues to be a major challenge.Recently, transition metal-catalyzed carboxylic acid or formyl-directed B(4,5)–H functionalization of o-carboranes has drawn increasing interest, since it provides an efficient approach for direct regioselective boron–carbon and boron–heteroatom bond formations (Scheme 1a),9 with major contributions by the groups of Xie,10 and Yan,11 among others.12 Likewise, pyridyl-directed B(3,6)–H acyloxylations (Scheme 1b),13 and amide-assisted B(4,7,8)–H arylations14 (Scheme 1c) have been enabled by rhodium or palladium catalysis, respectively.15,16 Despite indisputable progress, efficient approaches for complementary site-selective functionalizations of o-carboranes are hence in high demand.17 Hence, metal-catalyzed position-selective B(3,4)–H functionalizations of o-carboranes have thus far not been reported.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Chelation-assisted transition metal-catalyzed cage B–H activation of o-carboranes.Arylated compounds represent key structural motifs in inter alia functional materials, biologically active compounds, and natural products.18 In recent years, transition metal-catalyzed chelation-assisted arylations have received significant attention as environmentally benign and economically superior alternatives to traditional cross-coupling reactions.19 Within our program on sustainable C–H activation,20 we have now devised a protocol for unprecedented cage B–H arylations of o-carboranes with weak amide assistance, on which we report herein. Notable features of our findings include (a) transition metal-catalyzed room temperature B–H functionalization, (b) high levels of positional control, delivering B(3,4)-diarylated and B(3)-monoarylated o-carboranes, and (c) mechanistic insights from DFT computation providing strong support for selective B–H arylation (Scheme 1d).We initiated our studies by probing various reaction conditions for the envisioned palladium-catalyzed B–H arylation of o-carborane amide 1a with 1-iodo-4-methylbenzene (2a) at room temperature (Tables 1 and S1). We were delighted to observe that the unexpected B(3,4)-di-arylated product 3aa was obtained in 59% yield in the presence of 10 mol% Pd(OAc)2 and 2 equiv. of AgTFA, when HFIP was employed as the solvent, which proved to be the optimal choice (entries 1–5).21 Control experiments confirmed the essential role of the palladium catalyst and silver additive (entries 6–7). Further optimization revealed that AgOAc, Ag2O, K2HPO4, and Na2CO3 failed to show any beneficial effect (entries 8–11). Increasing the reaction temperature fell short in improving the performance (entries 12 and 13). The replacement of the amide group in substrate 1a with a carboxylic acid, aldehyde, ketone, or ester group failed to afford the desired arylation product (see the ESI). We were pleased to find that the use of 1.0 equiv. of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as an additive improved the yield to 71% (entry 14). To our delight, replacing the silver additive with Ag2CO3 resulted in the formation of B(3)–H mono-arylation product 4aa as the major product (entries 15–16).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryAdditiveSolventYield of 3aa/%Yield of 4aa/%
1AgTFAPhMe00
2AgTFADCE00
3AgTFA1,4-Dioxane00
4AgTFATFE213
5AgTFAHFIP594
6AgTFAHFIP00b
7HFIP00
8AgOAcHFIP5<3
9Ag2OHFIP<3<3
10K2HPO4HFIP00
11Na2CO3HFIP00
12AgTFAHFIP534c
13AgTFAHFIP423d
14 AgTFA HFIP 71 <3 e
15Ag2CO3HFIP934f
16 Ag 2 CO 3 HFIP 5 55 f , g
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol), 2 (0.48 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), additive (0.48 mmol), solvent (0.50 mL), 25 °C, 16 h, and isolated yield.bWithout Pd(OAc)2.cAt 40 °C.dAt 60 °C.eTFA (0.2 mmol) was added.f 1a (0.20 mmol), 2a (0.24 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5.0 mol%), and Ag2CO3 (0.24 mmol).g 2a was added in three portions every 4 h. DCE = dichloroethane, TFE = 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, HFIP = hexafluoroisopropanol, and TFA = trifluoroacetic acid.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we probed the scope of the B–H di-arylation of o-carboranes 1a with different aryl iodides 2 (Scheme 2). The versatility of the room temperature B(3,4)–H di-arylation was reflected by tolerating valuable functional groups, including bromo, chloro, and enolizable ketone substituents. The connectivity of the products 3aa and 3ab was unambiguously verified by X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis.22Open in a separate windowScheme 2Cage B(3,4)–H di-arylation of o-carboranes.Next, we explored the effect exerted by the N-substituent at the amide moiety (Scheme 3). Tertiary amides 1b–1f proved to be suitable substrates with optimal results being accomplished with substrate 1a. The effect of varying the cage carbon substituents R1 on the reaction''s outcome was also probed, and both aryl and alkyl substituents gave the B–H arylation products and the molecular structures of the products 3dd, 3ea and 3fa were fully established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Effect of substituents on B–H diarylation. aAt 50 °C.The robustness of the palladium-catalyzed B–H functionalization was subsequently investigated for the challenging catalytic B–H monoarylation of o-carboranes (Scheme 4). The B(3)–H monoarylation, as confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of products 4aa and 4ai, proceeded smoothly with valuable functional groups, featuring aldehyde and nitro substituents, which should prove invaluable for further late-stage manipulation.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Cage B(3)–H mono-arylation of o-carboranes.To elucidate the palladium catalysts'' working mode, a series of experiments was performed. The reactions in the presence of TEMPO or 1,4-cyclohexadiene produced the desired product 3aa, which indicates that the present B–H arylation is less likely to operate via radical intermediates (Scheme 5a). The palladium catalysis carried out in the dark performed efficiently (Scheme 5b). Compound 4aa could be converted to di-arylation product 3aa with high efficiency, indicating that 4aa is an intermediate for the formation of the diarylated cage 3aa (Scheme 5c).Open in a separate windowScheme 5Control experiments.To further understand the catalyst mode of action, we studied the site-selectivity of the o-carborane B–H activation for the first B–H activation at the B3 versus B4 position and for the second B–H activation at the B4 versus B6 position using density functional theory (DFT) at the PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP+SMD(HFIP)//TPSS-D3(BJ)/def2-SVP level of theory (Fig. 1). Our computational studies show that the B3 position is 5.8 kcal mol−1 more favorable than the B4 position for the first B–H activation, while the B4 position is 3.4 kcal mol−1 more favorable than the B6 position for the second B–H activation. It is noteworthy that here the interaction between AgTFA and a cationic palladium(ii) complex was the key to success, being in good agreement with our experimental results (for more details, see the ESI).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Computed relative Gibbs free energies in kcal mol−1 and the optimized geometries of the transition states involved in the B–H activation at the PBE0-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP+SMD(HFIP)//TPSS-D3(BJ)/def2-SVP level of theory. (a) First B–H activation transition states at the B3 and B4 positions. (b) Second B–H activation transition states at the B4 and B6 positions. Irrelevant hydrogen atoms in the transition states are omitted for clarity and the bond lengths are given in Å.A plausible reaction mechanism is proposed which commences with an organometallic B(3)–H activation of 1a with weak assistance of the amide group and assistance by AgTFA to form the cationic intermediate I (Scheme 6). Oxidative addition with the aryl iodide 2 affords the proposed cationic palladium(iv) intermediate II, followed by reductive elimination to give the B(3)-mono-arylation product 4aa. Subsequent B(4)-arylation occurs assisted by the weakly coordinating amide to generate the B(3,4)-di-arylation product 3aa. Due to the innate higher reactivity of the B(4)–H bond in intermediate 4aa – which is inherently higher than that of the B(6)–H bond – the B(3,6)-di-arylation product is not formed.Open in a separate windowScheme 6Proposed reaction mechanism.In summary, room temperature palladium-catalyzed direct arylations at cage B(3,4) positions in o-carboranes have been achieved with the aid of weakly coordinating, synthetically useful amides. Thus, palladium-catalyzed B–H activations enable the assembly of a wealth of arylated o-carboranes. This method features high site-selectivity, high tolerance for functional groups, and mild reaction conditions, thereby offering a platform for the design and synthesis of boron-substituted o-carboranes. Our findings offer a facile strategy for selective activations of B(3,4)–H bonds, which will be instrumental for future design of optoelectronics, nanomaterials, and boron neutron capture therapy agents.  相似文献   

6.
Site-selective fluorination of aliphatic C–H bonds remains synthetically challenging. While directed C–H fluorination represents the most promising approach, the limited work conducted to date has enabled just a few functional groups as the arbiters of direction. Leveraging insights gained from both computations and experimentation, we enabled the use of the ubiquitous amine functional group as a handle for the directed C–H fluorination of Csp3–H bonds. By converting primary amines to adamantoyl-based fluoroamides, site-selective C–H fluorination proceeds under the influence of a simple iron catalyst in 20 minutes. Computational studies revealed a unique reaction coordinate for the catalytic process and offer an explanation for the high site selectivity.

By converting primary amines to adamantoyl-based fluoroamides, site-selective C–H fluorination proceeds under the influence of a simple iron catalyst in 20 minutes.

Due to the pervasiveness of fluorine atoms in industrially relevant small molecules, all practicing organic chemists appreciate the importance of this element. As a result of its unusual size and electronegativity, fluorine imparts unique physicochemical properties to pendant organic molecules.1 For example, the strong C–F bond can prevent biological oxidation pathways, thereby thwarting rapid clearance and potentially improving pharmacokinetics of molecules.2 Moreover, the installation of fluorine or trifluoromethyl groups, with their strong inductive effects,2 can have a profound effect on the pKa of nearby hydrogen atoms.3 These attributes, among others, have solidified the importance of fluorinated molecules in the medicinal,1–4 material,5 and agrochemical6 industries. Yet, the same unique properties that make fluorine atoms attractive chemical modifiers also make their installation difficult. Consequently, new methods for site-selective fluorine incorporation remain highly desirable.7Methods to construct Csp2–F bonds traditionally make use of the Balz–Schiemann fluorodediazonization8 and halogen exchange (“Halex” process).9 Advances in transition metal-mediated fluorination have broadened access to Csp2–F-containing molecules,10 but methods to access aliphatic fluorides remain limited. Conventional methods to make Csp3–F bonds—such as nucleophilic displacement of alkyl halides11 and deoxyfluorination12—can have limited functional group compatibility and unwanted side reactions. A more efficient route to form aliphatic C–F bonds would target the direct fluorination of Csp3–H bonds (Scheme 1).13Open in a separate windowScheme 1(a) Previous work on functional-group directed Csp3–H fluorination; (b) our approach to N-directed fluorination.Recent efforts with palladium catalysis employ conventional C–H-metallation strategies to target Csp3–H bonds for fluorination.14 Alternatively, radical H-atom abstraction can remove the transition metal from the C–H-cleavage step, thereby offering a promising approach for Csp3–H-bond functionalization.15 With undirected C–H fluorination,16 however, selectivity remains a challenge in molecules without strength-differentiated Csp3–H bonds.17 To overcome this, our group pioneered the directed fluorination of benzylic Csp3–H bonds through an iron-catalyzed process that involves 1,5 hydrogen-atom transfer (HAT) to cleave the desired Csp3–H bond.18 Since this work, other groups have demonstrated directed Csp3–H fluorination based on radical propagation that proceeds through an interrupted Hofmann–Löffler–Freytag (HLF)19 reaction (Scheme 1a). These examples employ various radical precursors such as enones,20 ketones,21 hydroperoxides,22 and carboxamides23 to direct fluorination to specific Csp3–H bonds. Since amines are ubiquitous in natural products and drugs, we sought to use amines as the building block of our directing group to achieve fluorination of unactivated Csp3–H bonds (Scheme 1b). By using amines as the starting point, one could use the approach in straightforward synthetic planning for the late-stage functionalization of remote C–H bonds.In the design phase of the project, we needed to devise a synthetically tractable N–F system that would enable 1,5-HAT and allow for fluorine transfer (Scheme 1b). To begin, we decided to examine common amine activating groups that would support 1,5-HAT while avoiding undesired radical reactions. The chosen activating group would provide the ideal steric and electronic properties to enable both N–F synthesis and N–F scission for 1,5-HAT. We first examined common acyl groups (e.g., acetyl-, benzoyl, and tosyl-based amides), but these proved unsatisfactory. For example, fluoroamide synthesis was either not achieved or low yielding, and the desired fluorine transfer proceeded with significant side reactions or returned starting material. We then turned our attention to more sterically hindered amides—which allow for higher yielding fluoroamide synthesis. For fluorine transfer, we hypothesized that the increased steric bulk could slow intermolecular H-atom transfer, thereby leading more efficient intramolecular 1,5-HAT. To that end, we were delighted that pivaloyl-based fluoroamide 1a proceeded in 64% yield to form product 2a (Scheme 2a). Interestingly, 7% of 1a underwent fluorination at the tert-butyl group of the pivaloyl—presumably through a 1,4-HAT reaction (2aa, Scheme 2a).24 The problem is further exacerbated when the pivaloyl group is homologated by one methylene—providing only 7% yield of desired 2b with 32% of the fluorination taking place on the iso-pentyl group (2bb, Scheme 2a). In an attempt to “tie back” the pivaloyl group and prevent the undesired fluorination, we employed a cyclopropylmethyl-based fluoroamide but observed no improvement.Open in a separate windowScheme 2(a) The targeted 1,5-fluorination of unactivated aliphatic C–H bonds results in partial fluorination of the amine activating group; (b) DFT studies (uM06/cc-pVTZ(-f)-LACV3P**//uM06/LACVP** level of theory) identified the competing pathways responsible for alternate fluorination; (c) DFT (uM06/cc-pVTZ(-f)-LACV3P**//uM06/LACVP** level of theory) evaluation of adamantoylamides revealed higher transition state energy for 1,4-HAT due to restricted vibrational scissoring (d) adamantoyl-activated octylamine shows no fluorination of the activating group. a 1H-NMR yield using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard. b 19F-NMR yield using 4-fluorotoluene as an internal standard.At this point, 1a proved most promising for efficient fluorine transfer, as well as being the most synthetically accessible fluoroamide. The increased steric hindrance minimizes N-sulfonylation during fluorination with NFSI, a problem that plagued the synthesis of our previously targeted fluoroamides.18 Therefore, to further investigate how to improve fluorine transfer from 1a, we decided to model H-abstraction computationally.We hypothesized that the fluorinated side product 2aa was formed after 1,4-HAT. Since 1,4-HAT is rare,24 we employed DFT (see ESI for details) to calculate the 5-membered and 6-memebered transition-states for 1,4- and 1,5-HAT, respectively. Surprisingly, we found that the barrier for 1,4 C–H abstraction in 1a was 18.7 kcal mol−1, which was only 2.6 kcal mol−1 higher in energy than the barrier calculated for 1,5 C–H abstraction in the same system (Scheme 2b). This suggested that both processes were competing at room temperature. We attributed the comparable barriers to the flexibility of the tert-butyl group, which undergoes vibrational scissoring to accommodate the C–H abstraction. The transition state distortion is modest and allows the molecule to maintain bond angles close to the ideal 109.5° (Scheme 2b). Based on this insight, we sought to limit the scissoring of the tert-butyl group and prevent the 1,4-HAT that leads to the undesired side product. After investigating several possible candidates, the underutilized adamantoyl group appeared promising. To evaluate the rigidity of adamantane, we calculated the barriers for 1,4- and 1,5-HAT for the adamantoyl-capped octylamine 1c (Scheme 2c). As expected, the barriers for 1,4- and 1,5-HAT differed significantly—with 1,4 C–H abstraction proceeding with a barrier of 25.1 kcal mol−1 and the 1,5-HAT barely changed at 16.4 kcal mol−1—an 8.7 kcal mol−1 difference. Consequently, we synthesized 1c and subjected it to the reaction conditions. Excitingly, the adamantoyl-capped system produced desired product 2c in 75% yield with no fluorination of the adamantyl group (Scheme 2d).Using the newly devised adamantoyl-based fluoroamides, the reaction conditions were optimized. While a range of metal salts, ligands, and radical initiators were evaluated, Fe(OTf)2 proved unique in catalyzing fluorine transfer with fluoroamides.18 Catalyst loading of 10 mol% allowed convenient setup and minor deviations above or below this loading had little effect on yield (see ESI). Increasing the temperature to 40 °C produced a slight increase in yield (entry 2, Table 1). Likewise, raising the temperature to 80 °C resulted in full conversion of the starting material in 20 minutes with 81% yield of the desired product (entry 3, Table 1). It should be noted that fluorine transfer occurs efficiently at a variety of temperatures with adjustments in reaction time (see ESI). Increasing the reaction concentration or changing the solvent resulted in decreased yield (entries 4 and 5, Table 1). Furthermore, the absence of Fe(OTf)2 leads to no reaction and quantitative recovery of starting material, attesting to the stability of fluoroamides and the effectiveness of Fe(OTf)2 (entry 6, Table 1).Optimization of pertinent reaction parameters
EntrySolventTemp (°C)Conc (M)TimeYielda (%)
1bDMErt0.0515 h75
2DME400.0518 h79
3 DME 80 0.05 20 min 81
4DME800.120 min73
5THE800.0520 min38
6cDME800.0520 min0
Open in a separate windowaDetermined by 1H-NMR with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.bReaction ran inside of glovebox.cReaction ran without Fe(OTf)2.With the optimized conditions established, we evaluated the substrate scope of the reaction (Table 2). The reaction proved quite general for the fluorination of primary and secondary Csp3–H bonds (2c–l, Table 2), while tertiary Csp3–H abstraction led to greater side reactions and lower yields (2m). While all reactions resulted in complete consumption of the fluoroamide, only a singly fluorinated product is produced with the parent amide being the major side product (see ESI). The reaction proved selective for δ-fluorination even in the presence of tertiary Csp3–H bonds (e.g., 2h, 2j, and 2k), thereby demonstrating selectivity counter to C–H-bond strength. Interestingly, transannular fluorine transfer occurs with complete regioselectivity to produce 2l as the sole product. Additionally, benzylic C–H bonds can be fluorinated under these conditions (2n). The reaction also exhibits good functional group compatibility, allowing access to a variety of fluorinated motifs. In particular, the reaction proceeds in the presence of either free or protected alcohols (2o and 2p). Moreover, esters and halides are both tolerated to give fluorinated products 2q and 2r in good yield. Notably, the reaction provides access to fluorohydrin 2s—highlighting the unique ability of this methodology to access both fluorohydrins and γ-fluoroalcohols such as 2o. In addition to these examples, terminal alkene 1t works quite well giving 2t in 67% yield. Furthermore, alkene functionalizations of 2t would provide access to a diverse range of fluorinated motifs. To target difluoromethylene units with this methodology, fluoroamide 1u was prepared and subjected to the reaction conditions. Pleasingly, 2u was observed in 20% yield.Substrate scope for fluorine transfer
Open in a separate windowaIsolated yields. All reactions were run on 0.3 mmol scale unless otherwise noted.bYield reported as an average of two trials.c35 min reaction time.ddr = 1 : 3.2 when ran at room temperature for 24 h.e0.25 mmol scale.f0.18 mmol scale.g0.1 mmol scale, yield determined by 19F-NMR with 4-fluorotoluene as an internal standard.While exploring the substrate scope, we were surprised to discover that the fluoroamide N–F bond is unusually stable to a variety of common reactions. For example, fluoroamide 1o was carried through an Appel reaction, PCC oxidation, and Wittig reaction with minimal loss of the fluoroamide. With such robustness, it becomes obvious that fluoroamides could act as secondary amide protecting group—being installed and carried through a multi-step synthesis until fluorine transfer is desired. Moreover, the greater rigidity of adamantoyl-based amides relative to pivalamides offers greater stability to acid and base hydrolysis—another feature of this system. Fortunately, the amide can be cleaved using conditions reported by Charette et al. with no evidence of elimination or loss of the alkyl fluoride (see ESI).25To evaluate the differences between C–H bonds, we calculated the hypothesized minima and maxima en route to C–F bond formation for primary, secondary, and tertiary substrates (Fig. 1). To begin, we defined the start of the pathway with the fluoroamides as octahedral, high-spin Fe(OTf)2-DME complex (I).18 Ligand dissociation results in the loss of DME to form II which is 7.2 kcal mol−1 higher in energy relative to I. This ligand loss opens a coordination site that allows Fe to enter the catalytic cycle via F-abstraction from the fluoroamides. This proceeds with a barrier (II-TS) of ∼25 kcal mol−1 for all systems to form the corresponding N-based radical (III). This new N-based radical is generally about −10 kcal mol−1 from the starting materials. The 1,5-HAT proceeds through a six-membered transition state (III-TS) with 16.4, 12.6, and 9.7 kcal mol−1 barriers for primary, secondary, and tertiary substrates, respectively. This abstraction forms the corresponding C-based radicals (IV) that were −15.0, −19.9 and −22.4 kcal mol−1 relative to the starting materials for primary, secondary, and tertiary substrates, respectively. A barrierless transition allows for the abstraction of fluorine from Fe(iii)-fluoride to simultaneously furnish the products (V) and regenerate catalyst II. Interestingly, this transition seems to proceed with an intermolecular electron-transfer from the alkyl radicals to the Fe(iii) center. The overall process is highly exergonic at −53.7, −58.6, and −61.9 kcal mol−1 for primary, secondary, and tertiary substrates, respectively. We attribute the low yields for the tertiary example to rapid oxidation of the carbon radical, likely by Fe(iii), that forms a tertiary carbocation and leads to unwanted side reactions. The turnover-limiting step is the N–F abstraction by Fe (II-TS).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Computed relative Gibb''s free energies for intermediates and transition-states along the reaction pathway (uM06/cc-pVTZ(-f)-LACV3P**//uM06/LACVP** level of theory).An alternative pathway, related to the classic HLF reaction,19a,b would involve radical chain propagation. Although unlikely, we also evaluated this pathway computationally (Fig. 1). Consistent with our previous report,18 this process proceeds with an unfavorably high barrier of 30.0, 28.1, and 26.8 kcal mol−1 for primary, secondary, and tertiary substrates, respectively. Hence, this process cannot compete with the barrierless delivery of fluorine from the Fe(iii) fluoride species.In conclusion, we leveraged critical computational insights to enable the use of simple amines as a building block for the directed fluorination of C–H bonds. The reaction targets unactivated Csp3–H bonds site selectively regardless of bond strength. The reaction proceeds under mild iron catalysis that allows broad functional-group compatibility and provides access to unique fluorinated motifs. Moreover, we identified fluoroamides as surprisingly stable functional groups with likely implications for biology and materials. Mechanistic evaluation of fluorine transfer with DFT provided a detailed reaction coordinate that explains the observed reactivity. The overall reaction and mechanistic insights should provide chemists a more predictable approach to site-selective fluorination of C–H bonds.  相似文献   

7.
We report here a novel reductive radical-polar crossover reaction that is a reductive radical-initiated 1,2-C migration of 2-azido allyl alcohols enabled by an azidyl group. The reaction tolerates diverse migrating groups, such as alkyl, alkenyl, and aryl groups, allowing access to n+1 ring expansion of small to large rings. The possibility of directly using propargyl alcohols in one-pot is also described. Mechanistic studies indicated that an azidyl group is a good leaving group and provides a driving force for the 1,2-C migration.

We report here a novel reductive radical-polar crossover reaction that is a reductive radical-initiated 1,2-C migration of 2-azido allyl alcohols enabled by an azidyl group.

Since the groups of Ryu and Sonoda described the reductive radical-polar crossover (RRPCO) concept in the 1990s,1 it has attracted considerable attention in modern organic synthesis.2 By using this concept, a variety of complex molecules could be assembled in a fast step-economic fashion which is not possible using either radical or polar chemistry alone. However, only two RRPCO reaction modes are known to date: nucleophilic addition and nucleophilic substitution (Fig. 1A). The first RRPCO reaction is the nucleophilic addition of organometallic species, which is generated in situ from the reduction of a strong reducing metal with a carbon-centered radical intermediate and cations (E+ = H+, I+, Br+, path 1).3 However, the necessity for a large amount of harmful and strong reducing metals has greatly limited the scope and functional group tolerance of the reaction. Recently, photoredox catalysis has not only successfully overcome the shortcomings of using toxic strong reducing metals in the RRPCO reaction,4 but also enabled the development of several new RRPCO reaction types, including the nucleophilic addition with carbonyl compounds or carbon dioxide (path 2),5 the cyclization of alkyl halides/tosylates (path 3),6 and β-fluorine elimination (path 4).7 Although the RRPCO reaction has been greatly advanced by photoredox catalysis, it is still in its infancy, and the development of a novel RRPCO reaction is of great importance.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(A) Reductive radical-polar crossover reactions; (B) this work: reductive radical-initiated 1,2-C migration assisted by an azidyl group.Herein, we wish to report a new type of reductive radical-polar crossover cascade reaction that is the reductive radical-initiated 1,2-C migration under metal-free conditions (Fig. 1B). The development of this approach is not only to further expand the application of the RRPCO reaction, but also to solve the problems associated with the oxidative radical-initiated 1,2-C migration, such as the necessity for an oxidant and/or transition metal for the oxidative termination of the radicals, and also required sufficient ring strain to avoid the generation of epoxy byproducts.8 To realize this reaction, a driving force is needed to drive the 1,2-C migration after reductive termination, to avoid the otherwise inevitable protonation of the generated anion.9 Inspired by the leaving group-induced semipinacol rearrangement,10 we envisaged that 2-azidoallyl alcohols11 might be the ideal substrates for the reductive radical-initiated 1,2-C migration because these compounds contain both an allylic alcohol motif, which is vital for the radical-initiated 1,2-C migration, and an azidyl group, a good leaving group,12 which may facilitate the 1,2-C migration after the reductive termination of the radicals.With the optimal conditions established (ESI, Table S1), we then explored the scope of this radical-initiated 1,2-migration. As shown in Table 1, a series of naphthenic allylic alcohols could undergo n+1 ring expansion with minimal impact on the product yield (Table 1, 3aa–aq). Notably, only the alkyl groups were migrated when using benzonaphthenic allylic alcohols in the reaction. These results might be attributed to the aryl group possessing greater steric resistance. The structure of 3an was further verified by single-crystal diffraction. Interestingly, the vinyl azide derived from a pharmaceutical ethisterone was also a viable substrate, affording the migration product 3aq in 57% yield, which highlighted the applicability of this strategy in the late-stage modification of pharmaceuticals. Moreover, the acyclic allylic alcohol with an alkyl chain also successfully delivered the migration product 3ar in 64% yield.Substrate scope of 2-azidoallyl alcoholsab
Open in a separate windowaStandard reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), TMSN3 (2.0 mmol), 2a (3.0 mmol) in H2O (0.7 mL) and DMSO (1.4 mL) at 50 °C in air for 48 h.bIsolated yields.Next, we extend the reaction scope to a range of aryl allylic alcohols. In comparison with alkyl allylic alcohols, aryl allylic alcohols gave the migration products in higher yields. The structure of 3ba was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray single crystal diffraction (CCDC 1897779). As demonstrated by the arene scope (Table 1, 3ba–bl), a variety of aryl allylic alcohols, including electron-withdrawing phenyl, electron-donating phenyl, polysubstituted phenyl, and fused rings, afforded the corresponding products in moderate to high yields (67–89%). Unsurprisingly, the substrates containing electron-donating groups afforded higher yields than those containing electron-withdrawing groups.Phenols and their derivatives are important structural constituents of numerous pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, polymers, and natural products.13 The most common method for synthesising phenols is the hydroxylation of aryl halides.14 However, the method usually requires transition metals and harsh reaction conditions. Interestingly, by using the current strategy, inexpensive and abundant cyclopentadiene moieties can also be easily converted into phenols (Table 1, 3ca–cc) in moderate to good yield. Thus, this strategy provides metal-free and mild conditions for accessing phenols.Next, we investigated the migration capabilities of different groups (Table 2). When using a substrate that contains two different alkyl groups (1da), the product with the less sterically hindered alkyl group is obtained in a higher migration ratio. A comparison of aryl groups and alkyl groups in the same allylic alcohols showed that the migration of aryl groups was more facile, and the migration ratio ranged from 1 : 4 to 1 : 1.3 (3db–dd). The results of the migration ratio of different aryl groups (3de–dh) revealed that aryl moieties with electron-donating groups possessed higher migration ratios than aryl moieties with electron-withdrawing groups.Investigation of the migration efficiency
Entry 1 R1R2Yielda (%)
3d 3d′
1 1da Me t-Bu1542
2 1db MeC6H55326
3 1dc Me4-MeOC6H55614
4 1dd Me4-CF3C6H54232
5 1de C6H54-MeC6H54240
6 1df C6H54-MeOC6H54639
7 1dg C6H54-ClC6H54144
8 1dh C6H54-CF3C6H53648
Open in a separate windowaIsolated yields.After the evaluation of the scope of our allylic alcohols, we turned our attention to sulfonyl radical precursors (Table 3). We carried out the reaction of various sodium sulfinates with allylic alcohol 1ba under standard conditions. Pleasingly, the sodium sulfinates with straight chain alkyl (3ea), cyclic alkyl (3eb), and aryl (3ec–ef) groups were all suitable for this radical-initiated 1,2-carbon migration, and afforded corresponding products in 71–91% yield.Substrate scope of sodium sulfinatesa
Open in a separate windowaIsolated yields.In this work, the 2-azidoallyl alcohols substrates were derived from propargylic alcohols through a silver-catalyzed hydroazidation of alkynes.15 Consequently, we hypothesized that the radical-initiated 1,2-carbon migration could be directly achieved from propargylic alcohols in a one pot process. With a slight modification of the reaction conditions, we realized the one-pot preparation of the desired products from propargylic alcohols (Table 4). Propargylic alcohols containing cyclic alkyl (3ag and 3ah), heterocyclic alkyl (3ak and 3al), acyclic alkyl (3ar), and aryl (3ba) groups all gave the desired migration products, although the yields were slightly lower than those from the reactions of the 2-azidoallyl alcohols. It should be noted that the ring expansion products could be directly generated from a bioactive compound, ethisterone (3aq). Performing such a reaction in a single step could greatly reduce the cost of pharmaceutical modification. The fused phenol (3cd) could also be obtained in moderate yield via the one-step reaction. In addition, the migration order of the different substituted groups (3db) was nearly identical to that observed in vinyl azide-based protocol. Furthermore, alkyl sodium sulfinates (3ea) were also well tolerated.Substrate scope of propargyl alcoholsa,b
Open in a separate windowaStandard reaction conditions: 4 (0.5 mmol), TMSN3 (2.0 mmol), 2 (3.0 mmol), Ag2CO3 (0.05 mmol) in H2O (0.7 mL) and DMSO (1.4 mL) at 50 °C in air for 48 h.bIsolated yields.To gain more insight into the mechanism of radical-initiated 1,2-carbon migration, we conducted various experiments to confirm the presence or absence of radical and carbanion intermediates (Scheme 1). When the reaction of 1ba was performed in the presence of TEMPO (6.0 equiv.), the reaction was suppressed under the standard conditions (Scheme 1, eqn (1)), supporting the involvement of a radical intermediate. To prove the formation of a carbanion intermediate, we carried out two deuterium labeling experiments (Scheme 1, eqn (2) and (3)). The resulting products [d]-3ba and MA-1 contain the deuterium atom α in the carbonyl group, confirming the formation of a carbanion intermediate. To identify the key intermediate of the 1,2-migration, we prepared a potential intermediate M1 and subjected it to the standard conditions (Scheme 1, eqn (4)). But, the product 3ba was not observed and almost all of the M1 was recovered, which indicates that M1 is not a key intermediate. However, the product 3ba was obtained in a yield of 41% while M2 was subjected to the standard conditions (eqn (5)). If the hydroxyl group in the 2-azidoallyl alcohols was protected (M3), the reaction would not give the corresponding migration product (3ga), but generate product 5 with a yield of 51% (eqn (6)).11c These results proved that the reaction involved a 1,3-H migration process thereby enabling an oxygen anion intermediate IV (other mechanistic studies are discussed in ESI Fig. S1).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Mechanistic investigations.Based on the above experimental results and relevant literature, a possible reaction pathway was proposed as shown in Fig. 2. First, TolSO2TMS (I) is generated by the anion exchange of TolSO2Na with TMSN3. Such intermediates are known to be somewhat unstable,16 as similar to the analogous compounds, such as TolSO2I,17 and TMSTePh18 and thus undergo homolysis. Therefore, we anticipated that TolSO2TMS (I) should also yield sulfonyl and trimethylsilyl radicals.19 Then the 2-azidoallyl alcohol 1ba is readily attacked by the sulfonyl radical, leading to carbon-centered radical II. Subsequently, the carbon-centered radical II undergoes single electron transfer by the oxidation of sulfinate to the sulfonyl radical yielding the carbanion III.20 A 1,3-H shift of carbanion III affords the intermediate IV21 which rapidly undergoes 1,2-migration with the assistance of the azidyl leaving group, generating the desired product. It is worth noting that the present work is a novel radical reaction mode for vinyl azides compared to the existing reports that involve N–N bond breaking in the presence of radicals. Moreover, the development of this strategy is of great significance for the application of vinyl azides in the reconstruction of C–C bonds.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Proposed mechanism.On the other hand, the coupling of sulfonyl radicals produces intermediate V.22 The azidyl anion that is generated in the reaction is more prone to attack intermediate V to afford tosyl azide.23 Subsequently, tosyl azide is reduced to p-toluenesulfonamide by the trimethylsilyl radical.24 The sideproducts tosyl azide and p-toluenesulfonamide were isolated by column chromatography, and the associated TMSOH and TMS2O have been detected by GC-MS.25  相似文献   

8.
Convergent paired electrosynthesis is an energy-efficient approach in organic synthesis; however, it is limited by the difficulty to match the innate redox properties of reaction partners. Here we use nickel catalysis to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two opposite electrodes of an electrochemical cell, achieving direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds. This method yields a diverse set of diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in medicinal and materials chemistry. Preliminary mechanistic study suggests oxidation of a benzylic C–H bond, Ni-catalyzed C–C coupling, and reduction of a Ni intermediate as key elements of the catalytic cycle.

A direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds is achieved by integrating Ni-catalyzed benzyl–aryl coupling into convergent paired electrolysis.

Electrochemical organic synthesis has drawn much attention in recent years.1 Compared to processes using stoichiometric redox agents, electrosynthesis can potentially be more selective and safe, generate less waste, and operate under milder conditions.1b In the majority of examples, the reaction of interest occurs at one electrode (anode for oxidation or cathode for reduction), while a sacrificial reaction occurs at the counter electrode to fulfil electron neutrality.1a,2 Paired electrolysis uses both anodic and cathodic reactions for the target synthesis, thereby maximizing energy efficiency.1a,3 However, there are comparatively few examples of paired electrolysis for organic synthesis.1a,3,4Paired electrolysis might be classified into three types: parallel, sequential, and convergent (Fig. 1).1a,3a In parallel paired electrolysis (Fig. 1a), the two half reactions are simultaneous but non-interfering. In sequential paired electrolysis (Fig. 1b), a substrate is oxidized and reduced (or vice versa) sequentially. In convergent paired electrolysis (Fig. 1c), intermediates generated by the anodic and cathodic processes react with one another to yield the product.1a,3a,4b,c,5 The activation mode of all three types of paired electrolysis is based on the innate redox reactivity of substrates. As a result, the types of reactions that could be conducted by paired electrolysis remain limited. We proposed a catalytic version of convergent paired electrolysis, where a catalyst is used to cross-couple the two intermediates generated at the two separated electrodes (Fig. 1d). Although mediators have been used in paired electrosynthesis,3a,4c,6 catalytic coupling of anodic and cathodic intermediates remains largely undeveloped. This mode of action will leverage the power of cross-coupling to electrosynthesis, opening up a wide substrate and product space. Here we report the development of such a process, where cooperative nickel catalysis and paired electrolysis enable direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds (Fig. 1e).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Different types of paired electrolysis: (a) parallel paired electrolysis, (b) sequential paired electrolysis, (c) convergent paired electrolysis, (d) catalytic convergent paired electrolysis and (e) this work.Our method can be used to synthesize diarylmethanes, which are important structural motifs in bioactive compounds,7 natural products8 and materials.9 Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds has been recognized as an efficient strategy to synthesize diarylmethanes, and methods using metal catalysis10 and in particular combined photoredox and transition-metal catalysis have been reported.11 Electrosynthesis provides a complementary approach to these methods, with the potential advantages outlined above. The groups of Yoshida12 and Waldvogel13 previously developed synthesis of diarylmethanes via a Friedel–Crafts-type reaction of a benzylic cation and a nucleophile. The benzylic cations were generated by anodic oxidation of benzylic C–H bonds.14 To avoid the overoxidation of products and to stabilize the very reactive benzylic cations, the reactions had to be conducted in two steps, where the benzylic cations generated in the anodic oxidation step had to be trapped by a reagent. We thought a Ni catalyst could be used to trap the benzyl radical to form an organonickel intermediate, which is then prone to a Ni-catalyzed C–C cross-coupling reaction. Although such a coupling scheme was unprecedented, Ni-catalyzed electrochemical reductive coupling of aryl halides was well established.15 We were also encouraged by a few recent reports of combined Ni catalysis and electrosynthesis for C–N,16 C–S,17 and C–P18 coupling reactions.We started our investigations using the reaction between 4-methylanisole 1a and 4-bromoacetophenone 2a as a test reaction (Table 1). Direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds was challenging and was typically conducted using toluene derivatives in large excess, e.g., as a solvent.11a,b,11df To improve the reaction efficiency, we decided to use only 3 equivalents of 4-methylanisole 1a relative to 2a. After some initial trials, we decided to conduct the reaction in an undivided cell using a constant current of 3 mA. These conditions are straightforward from a practical point of view. After screening various reaction parameters, we found that a combination of 4,4′-dimethoxy-2-2′-bipyridine (L1) and (DME)NiBr2 as a catalyst, THF/CH3CN (4 : 1) as a solvent, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass as an anode and carbon fibre as a cathode gave a 50% GC yield of 1-(4-(4-methoxybenzyl)phenyl)ethanone 3a after 18 h (Table 1, entry 1). Extending the reaction time to 36 h improved the yield to 76% (isolated yield) (entry 2). The target products were formed in a diminished yield with other bipyridine type ligands (entries 3–5). Solvents commonly used in Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, such as DMA and DMF, were less effective (entries 7–8). Replacing carbon fibre by nickel foam or platinum foil as the cathode was detrimental to the coupling, but substantial yields were still obtained (entries 9–10). On the other hand, FTO could not be replaced as the anode. Using carbon fibre as the anode shut down the reaction (entry 11). Likewise, using Pt foil as the anode gave only a 7% GC yield (entry 12). The sensitivity of the reaction outcomes to the electrodes originates from the electrode-dependent redox properties of reaction components (see below). Additional data showing the influence of other reaction parameters such as nickel sources, current, concentration, and electrolytes are provided in the ESI (Table S1, ESI).Summary of the influence of key reaction parametersa
EntryLigandAnodeCathodeSolventYield (%)
1 L1 FTOCarbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 156
2 L1 FTOCarbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 176b
3 L2 FTOCarbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 143
4 L3 FTOCarbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 146
5 L4 FTOCarbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 121
6 L1 FTOCarbon fibreCH3CN4
7 L1 FTOCarbon fibreDMA15
8 L1 FTOCarbon fibreDMF6
9 L1 FTONi foamTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 145
10 L1 FTOPt foilTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 128
11 L1 Carbon fibre (1 cm2)Carbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 10
12 L1 Pt foil (cm2)Carbon fibreTHF/CH3CN = 4 : 17
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), (DME)NiBr2 (6 mol%), ligand (7.2 mol mol%), LutHClO4 (0.1 M), and lutidine (0.8 mmol) in solvent (2 mL) at 40 °C. GC yield.bReaction time: 36 h. Isolated yield.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we explored the substrate scope (Table 2). A large number of aryl and heteroaryl bromides could be coupled (3a–3x). These substrates may contain electron-rich, neutral, or poor groups. For aryl bromide bearing electron-donating groups, replacing (DME)NiBr2 by Ni(acac)2 gave higher yields (3k–3o). The method tolerates numerous functional groups in the (hetero)aryl bromides, including for example ketone (3a), nitrile (3b, 3u, and 3v), ester (3c, 3m, 3n, and 3s), amide (3d), aryl-Cl (3q), CF3(3i, 3t, and 3w), OCF3(3e), aryl-F(3x), pyridine (3w and 3x), and arylboronic ester (3g). We then probed the scope of benzylic substrates using 4-bromoacetophenone 2a as the coupling partner (3aa–3ai). Toluene and electron-rich toluene derivatives were readily arylated (3aa–3ac). Toluene derivatives containing an electron-withdrawing group such as fluoride (3ad) and chloride (3ae) could also be arylated, although a higher excess of them (10 equiv.) was necessary. More elaborated toluene derivatives containing an additional ester (3af, 3ai) or ether (3ag, 3ah, and 3ai) were also viable.Substrate scopea
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), (DME)NiBr2 (6 mol%), L1 (7.2 mol mol%), LutHClO4 (0.1 M), and lutidine (0.8 mmol) in THF/CH3CN (4 : 1, 2 mL) at 40 °C. Isolated yield.b(DME)NiBr2 (5 mol%) and L1 (6 mol%) were used as the catalysts.cNi(acac)2 was used instead of (DME)NiBr2.dSolvent: THF/CH3CN (3 : 1, 2 mL).e2 mmol toluene or its derivative was used as the substrate.fReaction time: 60 h.Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was applied to probe the possible processes at both the anode and cathode. The measurements were made in THF/CN3CN (4 : 1, 2 mL) using [LutH]ClO4 (0.1 M) as the electrolyte and lutidine (0.4 M) as an additional base to mimic the coupling conditions. The LSV curves of individual reaction components indicate that only 4-methylanisole 1a and the Ni catalyst may be oxidized at the anode (Fig. 2a). The current at 3 mA appears to be the sum of the oxidation currents of 1a and the Ni catalyst. Meanwhile, LSV curves indicate that only the Ni catalyst might be reduced at the cathode (Fig. 2b).Open in a separate windowFig. 2The LSV curves of different reaction components at the anode or cathode. The components were dissolved in THF/CN3CN (4 : 1, 2 mL); the solution also contained [LutH]ClO4 (0.1 M) and lutidine (0.4 M). Scan rate: 50 mV s−1. (a) The LSV curves of different reaction components at the FTO anode; (b) the LSV curves of different reaction components at the carbon fibre cathode; (c) the LSV curves of different reaction components at the carbon fibre anode.It was observed that FTO was an essential anode for the reactions. If FTO was replaced by a carbon fibre anode, no coupling product was obtained. LSV was performed to probe the oxidation of 1a and the Ni catalyst on a carbon fibre anode (Fig. 2c). The oxidation of the Ni catalyst was much easier on carbon fibre than on FTO. At 3 mA, the oxidation is exclusively due to the Ni catalyst. This result suggests that the absence of coupling on the carbon fibre anode is due to no oxidation of 1a. The different redox properties of 1a and the Ni catalyst observed on different electrodes might be attributed to the different nature of surface species which influence the electron transfer. Although FTO is rarely used in electrosynthesis, it is widely used in electrocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis for energy conversion.19 FTO is stable, commercially available and inexpensive. In our reactions, the FTO anode could be reused at least three times.The LSV curves in Fig. 2 revealed the issue of “short-circuit” of catalyzed/mediated paired electrolysis in an undivided cell, as the catalyst or mediator can be reduced and oxidized at both the cathode and anode. When carbon fibre or graphite was used as the anode, the short-circuit problem was very severe so that nearly no current was used for electrosynthesis. However, by using an appropriate anode such as FTO, the short-circuit problem was alleviated and around half of the current was used to oxidize the substrate (1a) while the other half was used to oxidize the nickel complex. The remaining short-circuit is one of the reasons why the current efficiencies of the reactions are low (<10%). Another factor contributing to the low current efficiency is the instability of the benzyl radical, which can abstract hydrogen from the solvent to regenerate the substrate. Nevertheless, useful products could be obtained in synthetically useful yields under conditions advantageous to previous methods.For the test reaction (Table 1), a small amount of homo-coupling product bis(4-methoxyphenyl)methane (<2%) was detected by GC-MS under the optimized conditions. In the absence of ligand L1, the yield of the homo-coupling products increased (∼8%). In the presence of a radical acceptor, the electron-withdrawing alkene vinyl benzoate, the product originating from the addition of a benzyl radical to the olefin was obtained in about 12% GC yield (ESI, Scheme S1). These data support the formation of a benzyl radical intermediate. As bromide existed in our reaction system, it is possible to be oxidized to form a bromine radical. Previous studies showed that a bromine radical can react with a toluene derivative to give a benzyl radical.11b,g,20 To probe the involvement of the Br radical, we conducted a coupling of 4-methylanisole 1a with 4′-Iodoacetophenone, using Ni(acac)2 instead of (DME)NiBr2 as the Ni source. We obtained a GC yield of 24% for the coupling after 18 h (Scheme S2). This result suggests that a Br-free path exists for the coupling, although a non-decisive involvement of Br/Br˙ cannot be ruled out.Based on the data described above, we propose a mechanism for the coupling (Scheme 1). The oxidation of a toluene derivative at the anode gives a benzyl radical. This radical is trapped by a LNi(ii)(Ar)(Br) species (B) in the solution to give a LNi(iii)(Ar)(benzyl)(Br) intermediate (C). The latter undergoes reductive elimination to give a diarylmethane and a LNi(i)(Br) species (A). There are at least two ways A can be convert to B to complete the catalytic cycle: either by oxidative addition of ArBr followed by a 1-e reduction at the cathode or by first 1-e reduction to form a Ni(0) species followed by oxidation addition of ArBr. In addition to a toluene derivative, a Ni species is oxidized at the anode. We propose that this oxidation is an off cycle event, which reduces the faradaic and catalytic efficiency but does not shut down the productive coupling.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Proposed mechanism of the direct arylation of benzylic C–H bonds.  相似文献   

9.
10.
Simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes can be processed to a variety of 1,1-difluorinated electrophilic building blocks via I(I)/I(III) catalysis. This inexpensive main group catalysis strategy employs p-TolI as an effective organocatalyst when combined with Selectfluor® and simple amine·HF complexes. Modulating Brønsted acidity enables simultaneous geminal and vicinal difluorination to occur, thereby providing a platform to generate multiply fluorinated scaffolds for further downstream derivatization. The method facilitates access to a tetrafluorinated API candidate for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Preliminary validation of an enantioselective process is disclosed to access α-phenyl-β-difluoro-γ-bromo/chloro esters.

Simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes can be processed to a variety of 1,1-difluorinated electrophilic building blocks via I(I)/I(III) catalysis.

Structural editing with fluorine enables geometric and electronic variation to be explored in functional small molecules whilst mitigating steric drawbacks.1 This expansive approach to manipulate structure–function interplay continues to manifest itself in bio-organic and medicinal chemistry.2 Of the plenum of fluorinated motifs commonly employed, the geminal difluoromethylene group3 has a venerable history.4 This is grounded in the structural as well as electronic ramifications of CH2 → CF2 substitution, as is evident from a comparison of propane and 2,2-difluoropropane (Fig. 1, upper). Salient features include localized charge inversion (C–Hδ+ to C–Fδ) and a widening of the internal angle from 112° to 115.4°.5 Consequently, geminal difluoromethylene groups feature prominently in the drug discovery repertoire6 to mitigate oxidation and modulate physicochemical parameters. Catalysis-based routes to generate electrophilic linchpins that contain the geminal difluoromethylene unit have thus been intensively pursued, particularly in the realm of main group catalysis.7–9 Motivated by the potential of this motif in contemporary medicinal chemistry, it was envisaged that an I(I)/I(III) catalysis platform could be leveraged to convert simple α-(bromomethyl)styrenes to gem-difluorinated linchpins: the primary C(sp3)–Br motif would facilitate downstream synthetic manipulations (Fig. 1, lower). To that end, p-TolI would function as a catalyst to generate p-TolIF2in situ in the presence of an external oxidant10 and an amine·HF complex. Alkene activation (I) with subsequent bromonium ion formation (II)11 would provide a pre-text for the first C–F bond forming process (III) with regeneration of the catalyst. A subsequent phenonium ion rearrangement12/fluorination sequence (III and IV) would furnish the geminal difluoromethylene group and liberate the desired electrophilic building block.Open in a separate windowFig. 1The geminal difluoromethylene group: bioisosterism, and catalysis-based access from α-(bromomethyl)styrenes via I(I)/I(III) catalysis.To validate this conceptual framework, a short process of reaction optimization (1a → 2a) was conducted to assess the influence of solvent, amine·HF ratio (Brønsted acidity)13 and catalyst loading (Table 1). Initial reactions were performed with p-TolI (20 mol%), Selectfluor® (1.5 equiv.) as an oxidant, and CHCl3 as the reaction medium. Variation of the amine : HF ratio was conducted to explore the influence of Brønsted acidity on catalysis efficiency (entries 1–4). An optimal ratio of 1 : 6 was observed enabling the product 2a to be generated in >95% NMR-yield. Although reducing the catalyst loading to 10 and 5 mol% (entries 5 and 6, respectively) led to high levels of efficiency (79% yield with 5 mol%), the remainder of the study was performed with 20 mol% p-TolI. Notably, catalytic vicinal difluorination was not observed at any point during this optimization, in contrast with previous studies from our laboratory.9d,i A solvent screen revealed the importance of chlorinated solvents (entries 7 and 8): in contrast, performing the reaction in ethyl trifluoroacetate (ETFA) and acetonitrile resulted in a reduction in yield (9 and 10). Finally, a control reaction in the absence of p-TolI confirmed that an I(I)/I(III) manifold was operational (entry 11). An expanded optimization table is provided in the ESI.Reaction optimizationa
EntrySolventAmine/HFCatalyst loading [mol%]Yieldb [%]
1CHCl31 : 4.52072
2 CHCl 3 1 : 6.0 20 >95
3CHCl31 : 7.52094
4CHCl31 : 9.232087
5CHCl31 : 6.01087
6CHCl31 : 6.0579
7DCM1 : 6.020>95
8DCE1 : 6.02093
9ETFA1 : 6.02084
10MeCN1 : 6.02050
11CHCl31 : 6.00<5
Open in a separate windowaStandard reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), Selectfluor® (1.5 equiv.), amine : HF source (0.5 mL), solvent (0.5 mL), p-TolI, 24 h, rt.bDetermined by 19F NMR using α,α,α-trifluorotoluene as internal standard.To explore the scope of this geminal difluorination, a series of α-(bromomethyl)styrenes were exposed to the standard reaction conditions (Fig. 2). Gratifyingly, product 2a could be isolated in 80% yield after column chromatography on silica gel. The parent α-(bromomethyl)styrene was smoothly converted to species 2b, as were the p-halogenated systems that furnished 2c and 2d (71 and 79%, respectively). The regioisomeric bromides 2e and 2f (70 and 62%, respectively) were also prepared for completeness to furnish a series of linchpins that can be functionalized at both termini by displacement and cross-coupling protocols (2a, 2e and 2f). Modifying the amine : HF ratio to 1 : 4.5 provided conditions to generate the tBu derivative 2g in 68% yield.14 Electron deficient aryl derivatives were well tolerated as is demonstrated by the formation of compounds 2h–2k (up to 91%). Disubstitution patterns (2l, 81%), sulfonamides (2m, 75%) and phthalimides (2n, 80%) were also compatible with the standard catalysis conditions. Gratifyingly, compound 2n was crystalline and it was possible to unequivocally establish the structure by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2, lower).15 The C9–C8–C7 angle was measured to be 112.6° (cf. 115.4° for 2,2-difluoropropane).5 Intriguingly, the C(sp3)–Br bond eclipses the two C–F bonds rather than adopting a conformation in which dipole minimization is satisfied (F1–C8–C9–Br dihedral angle is 56.3°).Open in a separate windowFig. 2Exploring the scope of the geminal difluorinative rearrangement of α-(bromomethyl)styrenes via I(I)/I(III) catalysis. Isolated yields after column chromatography on silica gel are reported. X-ray crystal structure of compound 2n (CCDC 2055892). Thermal ellipsoids shown at 50% probability.Cognizant of the influence of Brønsted acidity on the regioselectivity of I(I)/I(III) catalyzed alkene difluorination,9d the influence of the amine : HF ratio on the fluorination of electronically non-equivalent divinylbenzene derivatives was explored (Fig. 3, top). Initially, compound 3 bearing an α-(trifluoromethyl)styrene motif was exposed to the standard catalysis conditions with a 1 : 4.5 amine : HF ratio. Exclusive, chemoselective formation of 4 was observed in 79% yield. Simple alteration of the amine : HF ratio to 1 : 7.5 furnished the tetrafluorinated product 5 bearing both the geminal and vicinal difluoromethylene16 groups (55% yield. 20% of the geminalgeminal product was also isolated. See ESI). Relocating the electron-withdrawing group (α-CF3 → β-CO2Me) and repeating the reaction with 1 : 4.5 amine : HF generated the geminal CF2 species 7 in analogy to compound 4. However, increasing the amine : HF ratio to 1 : 6.0 led exclusively to double geminal difluorination (8, 55%).Open in a separate windowFig. 3Exploring the synthetic versatility of this platform. (Top) Leveraging Brønsted acidity to achieve chemoselective fluorination. (Centre) Bidirectional functionalization. (Bottom) Preliminary validation of an enantioselective variant.Similarly, bidirectional geminal difluorination of the divinylbenzene derivatives 9 and 11 was efficient, enabling the synthesis of 10 (46%) and 12 (70%), respectively. This enables facile access to bis-electrophilic fluorinated linchpins for application in materials chemistry.Preliminary validation of an enantioselective variant8d was achieved using the trisubstituted alkene 13. To that end, a series of C2-symmetric resorcinol-based catalysts were explored (see Fig. 3, inset). This enabled the generation of product 15 in up to 18 : 82 e.r. and 71% isolated yield. It is interesting to note that this catalysis system was also compatible with the chlorinated substrate E-14. A comparison of geometric isomers revealed a matched-mismatched scenario: whilst E-14 was efficiently converted to 16 (75%, 14 : 86 e.r.), Z-14 was recalcitrant to rearrangement (<20%).To demonstrate the synthetic utility of the products, chemoselective functionalization of linchpin 2a was performed to generate 17 (57%) and 18 (87%), respectively (Fig. 4). Finally, this method was leveraged to generate an API for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Whereas the reported synthesis17 requires the exposure of α-bromoketone 19 to neat DAST over 7 days,18 compound 2h can be generated using this protocol over a more practical timeframe (24 h) on a 4 mmol scale. This key building block was then processed, via the amine hydrochloride salt 20, to API 21.Open in a separate windowFig. 4Selected modification of building blocks 2a and 2h. Conditions: (a) NaN3, DMF, 110 °C, 16 h. (b) Pd(OH)2/C (10 mol%), EtOH, 1 M HCl, rt, 24 h; (c) CDI, Et3N, THF, 60 °C, 16 h; (d) malonyl chloride, DCM, 0 °C, 2 h.  相似文献   

11.
A novel and efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides under chiral squaramide catalysis was reported. Using this asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy, a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates were obtained with good to excellent yields (up to 92%) and enantioselectivities (up to 98.5 : 1.5 e.r.). The reaction could be scaled up, and the synthetic utility of the desired P-stereogenic compounds was proved by transformations and application in an asymmetric reaction.

A highly efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides was developed, providing a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with high yields and enantioselectivities.

P-Stereogenic compounds are a class of privileged structures, which have been widely present in natural products, drugs and biologically active molecules (Fig. 1a).1–4 In addition, they are also important chiral materials for the development of chiral catalysts and ligands (Fig. 1b), because the chirality of the phosphorus atom is closer to the catalytic center which can cause remarkable stereo-induction.5,6 Thus, the development of efficient methods for the synthesis of P-stereogenic compounds with novel structures and functional groups is very meaningful.5a Conventional syntheses of P-stereogenic compounds mainly depended on the resolution of diastereomeric mixtures and chiral-auxiliary-based approaches, in which stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents are usually needed.7 By comparison, asymmetric catalytic strategies, including asymmetric desymmetric reactions of dialkynyl, dialkenyl, diaryl and bisphenol phosphine oxides,8–14 (dynamic) kinetic resolution of tertiary phosphine oxides,15 and asymmetric reactions of secondary phosphine oxides,16 can effectively solve the above-mentioned problems and have been considered as the most direct and efficient synthesis methods for constructing P-chiral phosphine oxides (Fig. 1c). Among them, organocatalytic asymmetric desymmetrization methods have been sporadic, in which the reaction sites were mainly limited to the hydroxyl group of bisphenol phosphine oxides that hindered their further transformation.8–11 It is worth mentioning that asymmetric desymmetrization methods, especially organocatalytic desymmetrization reactions, due to their unique advantages of mild reaction conditions and wide substrate scope, have become an important strategy for asymmetric synthesis. Accordingly, the development of efficient organocatalytic desymmetrization strategy for the synthesis of important functionalized P-stereogenic compounds which contain multiple conversion groups is very meaningful and highly desirable.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(a) Examples of natural products containing P-stereogenic centers. (b) P-Stereogenic compound type ligand and catalyst. (c) Typical P-stereogenic compounds'' synthetic strategies.On the other hand, asymmetric bromination has been demonstrated to be one of the most attractive approaches for chiral compound syntheses.17 Since the pioneering work on peptide catalyzed asymmetric bromination for the construction of biaryl atropisomers,18a the reports on constructing axially biaryl atropisomers,18 C–N axially chiral compounds,19 atropisomeric benzamides,20 axially chiral isoquinoline N-oxides,21 and axially chiral N-aryl quinoids22 by electrophilic aromatic bromination have been well developed (Scheme 1a). In comparison, the desymmetrization of phenol through asymmetric bromination to construct central chirality remains a daunting task. Miller discovered a series of tailor made peptide catalyzed enantioselective desymmetrizations of diarylmethylamide through ortho-bromination (Scheme 1b).23 Recently, Yeung realized amino-urea catalyzed desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of phenol derivatives to fix a new class of potent privileged bisphenol catalyst cores with excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1b).24 Despite this elegant work, there is no report on the synthesis of P-centered chiral compounds using the desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination strategy.Open in a separate windowScheme 1(a) Constructing axially chiral compounds by asymmetric bromination. (b) Known synthesis of central chiral compounds via asymmetric bromination. (c) This work: access to P-stereogenic compounds via desymmetrizing enantioselective bromination.Taking into account the above-mentioned consideration, we speculated that bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates are potential substrate candidates for desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination to construct P-stereogenic centers. The advantages of using bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates as substrates are shown in two aspects. First, the ortho-position of electron rich phenol is easy to take place electrophilic bromination reaction. Second, the corresponding bromination product structure contains abundant synthetic conversion groups, including bromine, hydroxyl group, alkoxy group and phosphoryl group. To achieve this goal, two challenges need to be overcome: (i) finding a suitable chiral catalyst for the desymmetrization process to induce enantiomeric control is troublesome, due to the remote distance between the prochiral phosphorus center and the enantiotopic site; (ii) selectively brominating one phenol to inhibit the formation of an achiral by-product is difficult. Herein, we report a chiral squaramide catalyzed asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy to construct a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with good to excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1c). It is worth mentioning that the obtained P-stereogenic compounds can be further transformed at multiple sites.Our initial investigation was carried out with bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)phosphine oxide 1a and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) 2a as the model substrates, 10 mol% chiral amino-thiourea 4a as the catalyst, and toluene as the solvent, which were stirred at −78 °C for 12 h. As a result, the reaction gave the desired desymmetrization product 3a in 65% yield with 56 : 44 e.r. (Table 1, entry 1). Then, thiourea 4b was tested, in which a little better result was obtained (Table 1, entry 2). To our delight, using the chiral squaramides 4c–4f as the catalysts, the enantiomeric ratios of the desymmetrization products had been significantly improved (Table 1, entries 3–6). Especially, when chiral squaramide catalyst 4c was applied to this reaction, the enantiomeric ratio of 3a was increased to 95 : 5 (Table 1, entry 3). To further improve the yield and enantioselectivity, we next optimized the reaction conditions by varying reaction media and additives. As shown in Table 1, the reaction was affected by the solvent dramatically. Product 3a was obtained with low yield and enantioselectivity in DCM (Table 1, entry 7). Also, when Et2O was used as the solvent, the yield and e.r. value of product 3a were all decreased (Table 1, entry 8). As a result, the initial used toluene was the optimal solvent. We also inspected the effect of different bromine sources, and found that the initially used NBS was the optimal one (Table 1, entries 3, 11 and 12). Fortunately, by adjusting the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 1.5 equiv., the yield and the enantiomeric ratio of 3a were increased to 80% and 96.5 : 3.5, respectively (Table 1, entries 3, 13 and 14). Further increasing the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 2.0 equiv. resulted in a reduced enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 15).Optimization of the reaction conditionsa
EntryCat.Bromine sourceSolventYieldb (%)e.r.c
1 4a 2a Toluene6556 : 44
2 4b 2a Toluene4968 : 32
3 4c 2a Toluene6195 : 5
4 4d 2a Toluene4175 : 25
5 4e 2a Toluene5393 : 6
6 4f 2a Toluene3961 : 39
7 4c 2a DCM4789 : 11
8 4c 2a Et2O3967 : 33
9d 4c 2a Toluene6994 : 6
10e 4c 2a Toluene6193 : 7
11 4c 2b Toluene6394 : 6
12 4c 2c Toluene6587 : 13
13f 4c 2a Toluene7595 : 5
14g 4c 2a Toluene8096.5 : 3.5
15h 4c 2a Toluene7995 : 5
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (0.05 mmol), 2a (0.05 mmol) and cat. 4 (10 mol%) in the solvent (0.5 mL) was stirred at −78 °C for 12 h.bIsolated yield.cDetermined by HPLC analysis.d3 Å MS (10.0 mg) was used as the additive.e4 Å MS (10.0 mg) was used as the additive.f 1a : 2a = 1.2 : 1.g 1a : 2a = 1.5 : 1.h 1a : 2a = 2.0 : 1.Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of the desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of phosphine oxides was examined. Firstly, the variation of the P-center substituted group was investigated. As shown in Table 2, a variety of P-aryl, P-alkyl substituted phosphine oxides and phosphinates (3a–3f) were well amenable to this reaction and the corresponding ortho-brominated products were obtained in good yield (up to 87%) with high enantiomeric ratios (up to 98.5 : 1.5 e.r.). Moreover, regardless of whether the R was a bulky group or a smaller one, the enantiomeric ratios of the products were maintained at excellent levels. Especially, when the P-center substituted group was ethoxyl (1e), the corresponding bromination product 3e was obtained in 80% yield with 98.5 : 1.5 e.r. When a P-methyl substituted phosphine oxide was used as the substrate, a moderate yield and enantiomeric ratio were obtained for 3g.The scope of bisphenol phosphine oxides with different substituents on the P-atoma,b,c
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol) and 4c (10 mol%) in toluene (1.0 mL) was stirred at −78 °C for 12 h.bIsolated yield.cDetermined by HPLC analysis.Next, using the ethoxyl substituted phosphinate as the template, a diversity of phosphinates with a 5-position substituent on the phenyl ring were examined (Table 3). To our delight, a range of phosphinates with different alkyl substituent on the phenyl ring was suitable for the currently studied reaction and the desired products 3h–3l were obtained with very good enantioselectivities (90.5 : 9.5–97.5 : 2.5 e.r.). Furthermore, substrates with aryl and alkoxy groups at the 5-position of the phenol moiety were also tolerated well under the reaction conditions, and gave the products 3m–3q with good to excellent yields (81–92%) and enantioselectivities (95 : 5–98.5 : 1.5 e.r.). Moreover, when a disubstituted phenol phosphinate substrate was used, the desired bromination product 3r was also delivered with a good yield and e.r. value.The scope of bisphenol phosphinatesa,b,c
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol) and 4c (10 mol%) in toluene (1.0 mL) was stirred at −78 °C for 12 h.bIsolated yield.cDetermined by HPLC analysis.Then, we turned our attention to inspect the scope of ortho-bromination of P-adamantyl substituted phosphine oxides. As exhibited in Table 4, 5-methyl, 5-ethyl and 4,5-dimethyl aryl substituted phosphine oxides could be transformed into the corresponding products (3s, 3t and 3u) with excellent yields (81–89%) and enantioselectivities (95 : 5–96 : 4 e.r.). Upon increasing the size of the 5-position substituent on the phenyl ring of phosphine oxides, the enantioselectivities of the products 3v–3y had a little decreasing tendency (81 : 19–93 : 7 e.r.). The absolute configuration of 3v was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis and those of other products were assigned by analogy.25The scope of adamantyl substituted bisphenol phosphine oxidesa,b,c
Open in a separate windowaReaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol) and 4c (10 mol%) in toluene (1.0 mL) was stirred at −78 °C for 12 h.bIsolated yield.cDetermined by HPLC analysis.24d 1a : 2a = 1.2 : 1.To demonstrate the utility of this desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination, the reaction was scaled up to 1.0 mmol, and the corresponding product 3a was obtained in 80% yield with 96.5 : 3.5 e.r. (98.5 : 1.5 e.r. after single recrystallization) (Scheme 2a). The encouraging results implied that this strategy had the potential for large-scale production. Additionally, the transformations of products 3a and 3e were also investigated (Scheme 2b). In the presence of Pd(OAc)2 and bulky electron-rich ligand S-Phos, 3a could react with phenylboronic acid effectively, in which the desired cross-coupling product 5 was generated in high yield with maintained enantioselectivity. In the presence of Lawesson''s reagent, 3a could be transformed into thiophosphine oxide 6 with a high yield and e.r. value. Furthermore, 3e could react with methyl lithium to afford the DiPAMP analogue 3g in 85% yield with 98.5 : 1.5 e.r. And 3e could also be converted to chiral bidentate Lewis base 7 by a straightforward alkylation reaction. It was encouraging to find that 7 could be used as a catalyst for the asymmetric reaction between trans-chalcone and furfural, in which the desired product 8 was furnished with moderate stereoselectivity (Scheme 2c).26Open in a separate windowScheme 2(a) Large-scale reaction. (b) Synthetic transformations. (c) Application of the transformed product.Since the mono-bromination product 3a could undergo further bromination to form the dibromo adduct, we wondered whether this second bromination is a kinetic resolution process. As shown in Scheme 3a, a racemic sample of 3a was subjected to the catalytic conditions ((±)-3a and 2a in a 2 : 1 molar ratio). Upon complete consumption of 2a (with the formation of a dibromo product in 49% yield), the mono-bromination product 3a was recovered in 51% yield with 99 : 1 e.r. This result indicated that the second bromination was indeed a kinetic resolution process and had a positive contribution to the enantioselectivity. Considering the excellent enantiomeric ratio of recovered 3a, we further investigated the reaction of rac-9 with 2a under kinetic resolution conditions (Scheme 3b). To our delight, the unreacted raw material 9 can be obtained in 51% yield with 99.5 : 0.5 e.r., and chiral dihalogenated product 10 can also be generated in 49% yield with 90 : 10 e.r.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Kinetic resolution process.To investigate the mechanism, we performed some control experiments. First, a mono-methyl protected phosphine oxide substrate was prepared and subjected to ortho-bromination under the optimal conditions. As shown in Scheme 4a, the corresponding product 11 was obtained with 72.5 : 27.5 e.r. When the same reaction conditions were applied to the dimethyl protected phosphine oxide substrate, no reaction occurred (Scheme 4b). These results indicated that the phenol moieties of the substrate were essential for the bromination reaction. In fact, hydrogen bonds formed between the two phenolic hydroxyl groups and P Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O could be observed in the single crystal structure of the product 3w.25 Furthermore, when thiophosphine oxide, which had a weak hydrogen bond acceptor P Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 S group, was prepared and tested in the reaction, the corresponding product 6 was obtained with a lower yield and enantioselectivity than that of 3a (Scheme 4c). This result suggested that the intramolecular hydrogen bonds of the substrate might be beneficial for both the reactivity and the enantioselectivity.27 In light of the control experiments and previous studies,24 two possible mechanisms were proposed (see the ESI).Open in a separate windowScheme 4Control experiments: (a) mono-methyl protected phosphine oxide substrate was evaluated; (b) dimethyl protected phosphine oxide substrate was examined; (c) thiophosphine oxide substrate was investigated.In summary, a novel and efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides under chiral squaramide catalysis was reported. Using this asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy, a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates were obtained with good to excellent yields and enantioselectivities. The reaction could be scaled up, and the synthetic utility of the desired P-stereogenic compounds was proved by transformations and application in an asymmetric reaction. Ongoing studies focus on the further mechanistic investigations and the potential applications of these chiral P-stereogenic compounds in other asymmetric transformations.  相似文献   

12.
Herein, we report unprecedented aluminum-catalyzed halodefluorination reactions of trifluoromethyl- and difluoroalkyl-substituted olefins with bromo- or chlorotrimethylsilane. The interesting feature of these reactions is that one, two, or three fluorine atoms can be selectively replaced with bromine or chlorine atoms by modification of the reaction conditions. The generated products can undergo a variety of subsequent transformations, thus constituting a valuable stock of building blocks for installing fluorine-containing olefin motifs in other molecules.

Aluminum-catalyzed halodefluorination reactions of fluoroalkyl-substituted olefins are developed. The reactions can selectively deliver mono-, di-, or trisubstituted products.

Combined with the use of fluorine-18 for positron emission tomography, the discovery that incorporating fluorine atoms into drug molecules can improve their bioavailability, metabolic stability, and target specificity has driven the rapid development of new methods for generating C–F bonds and forming bond connections with fluorine-containing structural motifs over the past decade.1 However, synthesis of compounds bearing fluorovinyl (F–C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C) and gem-difluoroallyl (F2C–C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C) groups remains a challenge, despite the presence of these structural motifs in numerous drugs, such as tezacitabine,2 seletracetam,3 and tafluprost4 (Scheme 1a). We envisioned that synthesis of fluorovinyls containing an allylic bromine atom (F–C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C–C–Br) would facilitate the preparation of such compounds because the bromine atom would serve as a handle for a wide variety of substitution and cross-coupling reactions. The existing methods for their preparation generally rely on reactions of fluorovinyls containing an allylic hydroxyl group or gem-difluorinated vinyloxiranes with brominating reagents.5 Direct methods for their synthesis from readily accessible substrates are lacking.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of fluorovinyls via Lewis acid activation of trifluoromethylalkenes.Elegant work from the groups of Maruoka,6 Oshima,7 Ozerov,8 Müller,9 Stephan,10 Oestreich,11 Chen,12 and Young13 on C–F bond activation reactions has proven that Lewis acid-promoted abstraction of fluoride from alkyl fluorides is a powerful tool for generating carbocations that can be trapped by nucleophiles. When trifluoromethylalkenes were studied as substrates, Ichikawa et al. reported that aryldefluorination of trifluoromethylalkenes can be accomplished with a stoichiometric amount of EtAlCl2via fluoride abstraction and subsequent Friedel–Crafts reactions between the resulting allylic carbocation and arenes (Scheme 1b).14 In addition, Braun and Kemnitz and colleagues carried out hydrodefluorination reactions of trifluoromethylalkenes with hydrosilanes catalyzed by Lewis acidic nanoscopic aluminum chlorofluoride (Scheme 1b).15 In light of these reports and our experiences in developing Lewis acid-catalyzed reactions,16 we speculated that 3,3-difluoroallyl bromides (F2C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 C–C–Br) could be directly prepared from trifluoromethylalkenes and a suitable bromide source via Lewis acid activation of the C–F bonds and subsequent nucleophilic attack of the bromide anion at the distal olefinic carbon of the resulting allylic carbocation, a process that has no precedent in the literature.Herein, we report our discovery that by using an aluminum-based Lewis acid catalyst and bromotrimethylsilane (TMSBr) or chlorotrimethylsilane (TMSCl) as a halide source, we were able to achieve the proposed C–F bond activation/substitution reaction (Scheme 1c). Furthermore, simply by adjusting the stoichiometry of the reactants and the reaction temperature, we could selectively obtain mono-, di-, or trisubstituted products. Mechanistic studies indicated the multi-substitution reaction was achieved by thermally promoted 1,3-halogen migration of the initially formed product, followed by further halodefluorination. Notably, the previously reported defluorination reactions of trifluoromethylalkenes, either Lewis acid-catalyzed14,15 or promoted via other methods,17–19 usually provide monosubstitution products; that is, our finding that we could selectively generate multiply substituted products is also unprecedented.To test various reaction conditions, we chose α-aryl-substituted trifluoromethylalkene 1a as a model substrate (Table 1). TMSBr was selected as the bromide source because we expected the generated silyl cation to be an excellent scavenger for the displaced fluoride anion. We began by evaluating several Lewis acid catalysts and found that no reaction occurred when 1a was treated with B(C6F5)3, Zn(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3, Al(OTf)3, or ZrCl4 (5 mol%) and 3 equiv. of TMSBr in DCE at 80 °C for 24 h (entries 1–5). However, we were encouraged to find that AlCl3 would catalyze the proposed bromodefluorination reaction, giving monobrominated product 2a and dibrominated product 3a (ref. 20) in 17% and 2% yields, respectively (entry 6). Investigation of additional aluminum-based Lewis acids showed that AlEtCl2 and Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 (ref. 21) had higher activities: AlEtCl2 gave 2a and 3a in 5% and 38% yields, respectively (entry 7), and Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 gave 16% and 32% yields, respectively (entry 8). Because Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 is a solid and therefore easier to store and handle than AlEtCl2 (a liquid), we chose Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 for further investigation. Changing the solvent to toluene inhibited the formation of 3a, but failed to improve the yield of 2a (entry 9). Coordinative solvents (acetonitrile and dioxane) shut down the reaction entirely (entries 10 and 11). When the reaction temperature was increased to 120 °C, 2a and 3a were obtained in 13% and 68% yields, respectively (entry 13). Gratifyingly, when 4 equiv. of TMSBr relative to 1a was used, 3a was generated as the sole reaction product in 90% yield (Z/E = 55 : 45, entry 14). Next, we tried using TMSBr as the limiting reagent to determine whether we could obtain the monobrominated product (2a) as the major product. Indeed, when 3 equiv. of 1a was treated with 1 equiv. of TMSBr at 80 °C, 2a was obtained as the sole product, although the yield was only 30% (entry 15). Further screening of reaction conditions revealed that using 9.0 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 and running the reaction at 60 °C for 48 h (entry 16) gave the highest yield of 2a (76%; the yield of 3a was 8%).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryLewis acid 1a/TMSBr T (°C)SolventYieldb2a (%)Yieldb3a (%)
1B(C6F5)31 : 380DCEn.d.n.d.
2Zn(OTf)21 : 380DCEn.d.n.d.
3Sc(OTf)31 : 380DCEn.d.n.d.
4Al(OTf)31 : 380DCEn.d.n.d.
5ZrCl41 : 380DCETracen.d.
6AlCl31 : 380DCE172
7AlEtCl21 : 380DCE538
8cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 380DCE1632
9cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 380Toluene16n.d.
10cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 380CH3CNn.d.n.d.
11cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 380Dioxanen.d.n.d.
12cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 3100DCE2548
13cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 3120DCE1368
14cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.51 : 4120DCEn.d.90d
15cAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.53 : 180DCE30n.d.
16eAl(C6F5)3(tol)0.53 : 160DCE768
Open in a separate windowaUnless otherwise specified, reactions were performed with 0.1 mmol of 1a and 5 mol% of a Lewis acid in 1 mL of solvent for 24 h under N2.bYields were determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as the internal standard; the 2a/3a ratios were determined by 19F NMR; n.d. = not detected.c4.5 mol% Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 was used as catalyst.dThe Z/E ratio was 55 : 45.eThe reaction was carried out with 9.0 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 for 48 h.With the optimal conditions in hand, we first explored the scope of the monosubstitution reaction by testing various trifluoromethyl- and difluoroalkyl-substituted olefins 1 (Table 2, left column). From 1a, monobrominated product 2a could be isolated in pure form in 64% yield by means of preparative HPLC. When the α-phenyl ring bore an ortho-phenyl substituent, the reaction still afforded 2b in 58% yield despite the increased steric bulk around the reaction site. When the α substituent was changed to a 9-phenanthryl group (1c), monobrominated product 2c was isolated in 75% yield. We also tested other halogenating reagents with 1c: TMSI gave iodinated product 2c-I in 51% yield, whereas TMSCl was poorly reactive, giving a <10% yield of product. Furthermore, substrates with 1-naphthyl (2d), 4-dibenzothiophenyl (2e), and 4-dibenzofuranyl (2f) moieties at the α position were all suitable. Interestingly, even the reaction of conjugated diene 1g was feasible, giving brominated diene 2g in 67% isolated yield. In addition, a series of α-alkyl-substituted trifluoromethylalkenes gave the desired products (2h–2k) in moderate yields. Difluoroalkyl-substituted alkenes were also reactive; specifically, benzene-fused methylenecycloalkanes 1l–1n gave the corresponding products (2l–2n) in 59–88% yields. Finally, acyclic substrate 1o afforded (E)-2o as the predominant isomer (E/Z > 10 : 1) in 50% yield.Scope of the mono and disubstitution reactiona
Open in a separate windowaCondition A: reactions were performed with 0.6 mmol of 1, 0.2 mmol of TMSBr, and 9.0 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 in 1.5 mL of DCE at 60 °C for 48 h; condition B: reactions were performed with 0.2 mmol of 1, 0.8 mmol of TMSBr, and 4.5 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 in 1.5 mL of DCE at 120 °C for 24 h; isolated yields are reported.bThe reaction was performed at 80 °C.cTMSI was used instead of TMSBr.dThe reaction was carried out with 13.5 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5.e4 equiv. of 1 was used.fThe reaction was performed with 5 equiv. of TMSBr.Next the scope of the disubstitution reaction was investigated (Table 2, right column). Trifluoromethyl-substituted alkenes bearing electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups on the α-aryl ring were reactive, affording the corresponding products (3a and 3p–3r) in 69–85% yields with Z/E ratios of approximately 1 : 1. 1-Naphthyl (3d), 4-dibenzothiophenyl (3e), 4-dibenzofuranyl (3f), and aliphatic (3h–3j, 3s, and 3t) substituents at the α position were well tolerated. Interestingly, even alkynyl-substituted trifluoromethylalkenes afforded the desired disubstituted products (3u and 3v) in good yields. In addition, difluoroalkyl-substituted alkenes 1n and 1o gave completely defluorinated products 3n and 3o in 46% and 60% yields, respectively. Notably, under these conditions, the monobrominated products either did not form or formed in only trace amounts, as indicated by GC-MS or NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the E and Z isomers of dibrominated products were found interconvertible under the reaction conditions (for details, see the ESI) so the Z/E ratios of products might be the result of the thermodynamic equilibrium.It is also worth mentioning that some substrates shown in Table 2 were not compatible either with the monosubstitution reaction or with the disubstitution reaction. For example, substrates bearing coordinative functional groups, such as methoxy, carbonyl, sulfonyl and alkyne (1p, 1q, 1r, 1t, 1u, and 1v), gave very low yields (<20%) for monosubstitution, perhaps because the relatively low reaction temperature (60 °C) was not sufficient to break the coordination of these functional groups to the Lewis acid catalyst. Furthermore, Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 is probably a precatalyst because Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 rapidly decomposes in DCE to give a mixture of unidentified aluminum species21b that are active for the halodefluorination reaction (for details, see the ESI).We performed several control experiments to explore the reaction mechanism. When substrate 1a was treated with mesitylene in the presence of 1 equiv. of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5, Friedel–Crafts allylation of the aromatic ring generated product 4 in 96% yield (Scheme 2a).22 This result demonstrates that the aluminum Lewis acid could abstract fluoride from the trifluoromethylalkene to generate an allylic carbocation. Furthermore, when 2a was subjected to the conditions used for the disubstitution reaction, 3a was isolated in 65% yield (Scheme 2b), indicating that the dibrominated products were generated via monobrominated intermediates. However, subjecting nonbrominated 5 to the same conditions did not result in substitution of the vinylic fluorine atom by the bromine atom (6, Scheme 2c), which excludes the vinylic nucleophilic substitution (SNV) mechanism23 for the conversion from 2a to 3a. We thus suspected that the allylic bromine atom in 2a was involved in this conversion. Indeed, when 2a was heated at 120 °C in toluene for 12 h, 1,3-migration of the bromine atom gave bromodifluoromethylalkene 7 in 83% NMR yield (Scheme 2d).24 And, treatment of 7 with TMSBr in the presence of the catalyst at 120 °C gave 3a in 77% yield (Scheme 2e). Taken together, these results indicate that dibrominated products were generated via isomerization of the monobrominated product to form bromodifluoromethylalkenes, which then underwent a second bromodefluorination reaction. In addition, silylium Et3Si[B(C6F5)4]25 was found incapable of catalyzing the bromodefluorination reaction (Scheme 2f). This result suggests that the Lewis acidic aluminum is probably a catalyst, rather than an initiator, and TMS+ from TMSBr abstracts the fluoride from the aluminum–fluoride adduct to regenerate the active catalyst.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Control experiments.These results led us to wonder whether all three fluorine atoms of a trifluoromethylalkene could be replaced with bromine atoms via a 1,3-bromo migration reaction of the dibrominated product to give a dibromofluoromethylalkene, which would then undergo bromodefluorination. After screening various reaction conditions, we discovered that tribrominated products could be obtained by using a large excess (e.g., 10 equiv.) of TMSBr and extending the reaction time; however, in all cases, substantial amounts of the dibrominated products were always produced as well (see Table S1 in the ESI), which made separation of the product difficult. However, we were delighted to find that when TMSCl was used in large excess (7 equiv.) and the reaction temperature was 120 °C, trichlorinated compounds were the major or only products (Table 3). However, these conditions were suitable only for substrates bearing α-aryl substituents. The moderate to low yields of these reactions were due mainly to decomposition of the starting materials rather than to the formation of mono- or dichlorinated byproducts.Scope of trisubstitution reactiona
Open in a separate windowaUnless otherwise specified, reactions were performed with 0.2 mmol of 1, 1.4 mmol of TMSCl, and 9.0 mol% of Al(C6F5)3(tol)0.5 in 1.5 mL of DCE at 120 °C for 24 h; isolated yields are reported.As mentioned above, bromine atoms are among the most useful substituents for introducing other functional groups. To explore the utility of the above-described reactions, we carried out some transformations of the products (Scheme 3). For example, treatment of monobrominated product 2d with estrone under basic conditions delivered phenoxy-substituted product 9 in 65% yield via an SN2′ reaction. Additionally, azide and an indole were also suitable nucleophiles for SN2′ reactions, giving 10 and 11 in 50% and 79% isolated yields, respectively. Furthermore, a Suzuki coupling reaction of 2d with an arylboronic acid delivered coupling product 12 in 61% yield, and treatment of 2d with hexaldehyde gave alcohol 13 (63% yield) via an indium-mediated gem-difluoroallylation reaction.5b Reaction of dibrominated product 3a with an allyl Grignard reagent selectively replaced the allylic bromide to give compound 14. Subsequent electrophilic fluorination of 14 with Selectfluor in the presence of MeOH afforded α-CF2Br-substituted ether 15 in 41% yield. In addition, 14 could undergo a Pd-catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction to generate fluoro-substituted cyclopentene 16 in 54% yield. Notably, both (Z)- and (E)-14 underwent these last two transformations to give a single product, thus eliminating the need to separate the isomers.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Transformations of products 2d and 3a.  相似文献   

13.
Sulfuric chloride is used as the source of the –SO2– group in a palladium-catalyzed three-component synthesis of sulfonamides. Suzuki–Miyaura coupling between the in situ generated sulfamoyl chlorides and boronic acids gives rise to diverse sulfonamides in moderate to high yields with excellent reaction selectivity. Although this transformation is not workable for primary amines or anilines, the results show high functional group tolerance. With the solving of the desulfonylation problem and utilization of cheap and easily accessible sulfuric chloride as the source of sulfur dioxide, redox-neutral three-component synthesis of sulfonamides is first achieved.

Sulfuric chloride is used as the source of the –SO2– group in a palladium-catalyzed three-component synthesis of sulfonamides.

Since its development in the 1970s,1 Suzuki–Miyaura coupling has become a widely used synthetic step in diverse areas. With two of the most widely sourced materials, organoborons and alkyl/aryl halides, a number of C–C coupling reactions are established and the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction has successfully acted as the key step in the synthesis of medicines and agrochemicals.2In addition to the well-known aryl halides and esters, various other substrates such as acid chlorides,3 anhydrides,4 diazonium salts5 and sulfonyl chlorides6 were also reported for the coupling in the past decades. As far as acid chlorides are concerned, carbamoyl chlorides were successfully transformed to the corresponding benzamides in the early years of the 21st century.7 However, the use of sulfamoyl chlorides as coupling partners is challenging due to the strong electron-withdrawing properties of the sulfonyl group, which cause the tendency of desulfonylation to form tertiary amines.Synthesis of sulfonyl-containing compounds, especially sulfones and sulfonamides, via the insertion of sulfur dioxide has been extensively studied during the last decade.8 A series of sulfur-containing surrogates have been developed as the source of the –SO2– group. Willis and co-workers first reported the use of DABCO·(SO2)2, a bench-stable solid adduct of DABCO and gaseous SO2 discovered by Santos and Mello,9a as the source of sulfur dioxide in the synthesis of sulfonylhydrazines.9b Soon after, alkali metal metabisulfites were found to provide sulfur dioxide for the formation of sulfonyl compounds.10 In the recent developments in this field, DABCO·(SO2)2 and metabisulfites have become the most popular SO2 surrogates for the insertion of sulfur dioxide.8 However, the practical applications of sulfur dioxide insertion reactions are limited by atom-efficiency problems and the unique properties of reactants. For instance, the three-component synthesis of aryl sulfonylhydrazines using aryl halides, SO2 surrogates and hydrazines by a SO2-doped Buchward–Hartwig reaction was realized in the earliest developments in this field.10 However, similar transformations from aryl halides and amines to the corresponding sulfonamides still remain unresolved (Scheme 1a).11,12Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthetic approaches to sulfonamides.In order to provide a simple and efficient method for the three-component synthesis of aryl sulfonamides without the pre-synthesis of sulfonyl chlorides, many scientists have made various attempts. Interestingly, the use of arylboronic acids instead of aryl halides provided an alternative route. An oxidative reaction between boronic acids, DABCO·(SO2)2 and amines for the preparation of aryl sulfonamides at high temperature was realized,12 while reductive couplings of boronic acids, SO2 surrogates and nitroarenes were also reported (Scheme 1b).13 However, due to the reversed electronic properties of boronic acids from halides, additional additives and restrictions had to be considered. Extra oxidants and harsh conditions were usually used, and some of the transformations required “oxidative” substrates, such as nitroarenes and chloroamines.14Early in 2020, a reductive hydrosulfonamination of alkenes by sulfamoyl chlorides was reported,15 which gave us the inspiration to use in situ generated sulfamoyl chlorides as the electrophile for the synthesis of aryl sulfonamides by Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. In this way, sulfamoyl chlorides could be formed by nucleophilic substitution of an amine to sulfuric chloride, and the S(vi) central atom introduced into the reaction could reverse the electronic properties of the amine, which would eliminate the addition of oxidants (Scheme 1c). With the utilization of boronic acids as the coupling partner, a palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling could provide the sulfonamide products. Compared with traditional attempts, reversing the electronic properties of an amine from nucleophilic to electrophilic could reverse the whole reaction process, and two-step synthesis starting from the amine side could bypass the existing difficulty of S–N bond forming reductive elimination.12 Instead, a C–S bond formation could be the key for success (Scheme 2). In this proposed route, the presence of a base would be essential to remove the acid generated in situ during the reaction process. Additionally, we expected that the addition of a ligand would improve the oxidative addition of Pd(0) to sulfamoyl chloride, thus leading to the desired sulfonamide product.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Comparison between the traditional route and designed work.As designed based on our assumption, we used a commercialized sulfamoyl chloride intermediate A, which would be generated from morpholine 1a and SO2Cl2, to start our early investigations. The results showed that the direct Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of sulfamoyl chloride intermediate A and 2-naphthaleneboronic acid 2a mostly led to the generation of byproduct 3a′ with traditional phosphine ligands added to the reaction, and the desired product 3a was obtained in poor yields (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). It is known that an electron-rich ligand would enhance the oxidative addition of Pd(0) to the electrophile, and the bulky factor would facilitate the reductive elimination process. As expected, the yield of product 3a was increased significantly when electron-rich and bulky tris-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)phosphine was used as the ligand (Table 1, entry 3). Moreover, the reaction could proceed more efficiently by using a mixture of THF and MeCN as the co-solvent (Table 1, entry 4).Early investigations using morpholine-4-sulfonyl chloride A as the starting material
EntrySolventLigandYielda (%)
11,4-DioxanePtBu3·HBF414
2THFPtBu3·HBF423
3THFPAr3·Ar = 2,6-di-OMe–C6H357
4THF/MeCNPAr3·Ar = 2,6-di-OMe–C6H372
Open in a separate windowa 1H NMR yield obtained using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.With that brief conclusion in hand, we then shifted our focus to the in situ generation of sulfamoyl chloride intermediate A in the reaction process, and a number of attempts were made with morpholine 1a and SO2Cl2 (for details, see the ESI). After careful measurement of product 3a and desulfonylated byproduct 3a′ generated during the transformation, the selective formation of compound 3a was realized and “standard conditions” were identified. By using PdCl2(PhCN)2 as the catalyst and Na2HPO4 as the base, the desired product 3a was isolated in 71% yield, giving the least amount of desulfonylated product 3a′ (Table 2, entry 1). The control experiment showed that 3a or 3a′ was not detected in the absence of the palladium catalyst (Table 2, entry 2). It was also observed that compound 3a′ could not be generated when SO2Cl2 was omitted (Table 2, entry 3), indicating that the byproduct wasn''t produced by the direct coupling of boronic acid and amine. Other changes to the catalyst, ligand, base or solvent all resulted in lower yields of compound 3a or higher yields of desulfonylated product 3a′ (Table 2, entries 4–7).Effects of variation of reaction parametersa
EntryVariation from “standard conditions”Yield of 3a′b (%)Yield of 3ab (%)
1None580 (69)
2No PdCl2(PhCN)2n.d.n.d.
3No SO2Cl2n.d.n.d.
4Pd(OAc)2 instead of PdCl2(PhCN)21380
5PPh3 instead of PAr31568
6K2CO3 instead of Na2HPO44323
7MeCN instead of THF/MeCN1663
Open in a separate windowaStandard conditions: morpholine 1a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), SO2Cl2 (0.5 mmol, 2.5 equiv.), Et3N (0.53 mmol, 2.65 equiv.), 2-naphthaleneboronic acid 2a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), Na2HPO4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), PdCl2(PhCN)2 (10 mol%), tris-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)phosphine (20 mol%), THF (1.0 mL)/MeCN (1.5 mL), 70 °C, 16 h. See the ESI for the detailed procedure.b 1H NMR yield obtained using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard. The isolated yield of entry 1 is shown in parentheses.With the “standard conditions” in hand, various secondary amines 1 and arylboronic acids 2 were subjected to the reaction for the exploration of substrate adaptability (Scheme 3). To our delight, most of the reactions proceeded smoothly, giving rise to the desired product 3 in moderate to high yields. Considering the scope of boronic acids, a number of para-, meta- and ortho-(3t) substituted boronic acids showed good reactivities. However, lower yields were observed for some substrates with electron-withdrawing substituents, providing more desulfonylated byproducts due to the electron-deficiency of the palladium intermediate. Aryl boronic acids with acid-sensitive Boc-substituted amine, oxidation-sensitive phenol, sulfide and vinyl substitution were all tolerated. It is noteworthy that bromo- and acetoxy-substrates could also be efficiently converted to the corresponding products 3f and 3r, showing quite high selectivity during the reaction process. A series of heteroaromatic products were afforded successfully as well, and compounds with indole, indazole, dibenzothiophene and pyridine were all compatible (3aa–3af).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Synthesis of sulfonamides via a palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. Isolated yields.Subsequently, with respect to amines, 4-phenylboronic acid and 4-(methylthio)phenylboronic acid were selected as coupling partners based on their electronic properties and cost. Saturated cyclic products 3ah–3an were obtained in moderate yields, among which an α-amino acid derivative showed high reactivity, giving rise to product 3aj in 71% yield. Methylallylamine was transformed to the corresponding product 3ao smoothly, and thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide was also tolerated under the conditions (3ap). Various sensitive groups including acetyl, Boc, Cbz and cyclopropylcarbonyl (3aq–3at) on amines remained intact during the transformation. However, the amine scope was limited, since the transformation failed to provide the corresponding products when primary amines or anilines were used as the substrates. We assumed that during the reaction process for the oxidative addition of the sulfamoyl chloride intermediate to the palladium catalyst, Pd–SO2–NHR would be formed when a primary amine was used. Thus, β-hydride elimination would occur instead of the desired process.Furthermore, the practicality of this method was also verified by gram-scale synthesis and late-stage functionalization (Scheme 4). The reaction worked smoothly on the 4.0 mmol scale, and reducing the loading amount of the palladium catalyst to 1 mol% showed no obvious impact on the transformation. With a boronic acid synthesized from estrone and desloratadine, an antihistamine drug used as the substrate, the target products 4a and 4b were achieved in moderate to good yields, showing potential possibilities for synthetic applications.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Gram-scale synthesis and late-stage functionalization.In conclusion, a redox-neutral three-component synthesis of sulfonamides is established through a palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of sulfuric chloride, secondary amines and arylboronic acids. Sulfuric chloride is used as the source of sulfur dioxide, and the S(vi) linchpin makes the transformation possible without the assistance of oxidants. Although this transformation is not workable for primary amines or anilines, the results show high functional group tolerance and good selectivity. A clear reaction process is described, in which the in situ generated sulfamoyl chloride undergoes a palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reaction with boronic acids, giving rise to the corresponding sulfonamide products. Additionally, the desulfonylation problem is surmounted during the reaction process. With a boronic acid synthesized from estrone and an antihistamine drug, desloratadine, used as the substrate, the target products are achieved in moderate to good yields, showing potential possibilities for synthetic applications in organic chemistry and medicinal chemistry.  相似文献   

14.
A dual catalytic chemo-selective cross-coupling reaction of two enals is developed. One enal (without α-substitution) is activated by an NHC catalyst to form an acylazolium enolate intermediate that undergoes Michael-type addition to another enal molecule bearing an alkynyl substituent. Mechanistic studies indicate that non-covalent interactions between the alkynyl enal and the NHC·HX catalyst play important roles in substrate activation and enantioselectivity control. Many of the possible side reactions are not observed. Our reaction provides highly chemo- and diastereo-selective access to chiral lactones containing functionalizable 1,3-enyn units with excellent enantioselectivities (95 to >99% ee).

An NHC-catalyzed dual activation of two different enals is disclosed with both covalent and non-covalent activation pathways involved.

The development of chemo-selective reactions of two or more substrates bearing similar functional groups remains a classic challenge in organic synthesis.1 Enals (α,β-unsaturated aldehydes) are common building blocks that offer multiple useful modes of reactions. For instance, enals are readily used as Michael acceptors in many reactions including organic catalytic reactions mediated by amines.2 In the area of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) organocatalysis,3 enals are used as precursors of several NHC-bound intermediates, including Breslow acyl anion intermediates,4 homoenolate intermediates,5 enolate intermediates,6 and acylazolium intermediates.7 Somewhat surprisingly, on the other hand, there is little success in using enals as Michael acceptors to react with any of these NHC-bound intermediates.8 Elegant studies in this direction are from Scheidt, in which they showed that in the presence of an NHC catalyst, a homo coupling reaction of enals (with one enal molecule as the Michael acceptor) occurred effectively (Fig. 1a, top side).8a,c Berkessel reported an intramolecular reaction of two enal moieties (in one molecule) to form a bicyclic lactone adduct in the presence of an achiral NHC catalyst (Fig. 1a, bottom side).8b To the best of our knowledge, the intermolecular Michael addition reaction of two different enal substrates mediated by NHC catalysts has not been reported.9 Possible reasons for the difficulties of enals to behave as effective Michael acceptors likely include: (a) the relatively low electrophilicity of the α,β-unsaturated bonds of enals under the typical NHC catalytic conditions and (b) the presence of competing reactions involving both the alkene and aldehyde moieties of enals.Open in a separate windowFig. 1NHC-catalyzed reactions (a) with enals as Michael acceptors, (b) via cross intermolecular reactions of two enals, and (c) bio-active molecules bearing alkyne units.Here we disclose the first cross intermolecular reaction of two enals catalyzed by NHC catalysts (Fig. 1b). We envisioned that installation of an alkynyl substituent at the α-position of an enal can likely promote its reactivity as a Michael acceptor.10 The presence of an α-substituent can interrupt π-conjugations and thus minimize its reactivity via the corresponding enal-derived enolate/homoenolate intermediate formed with NHC, as shown by Bode, Glorius and others.6b,11 In addition, the alkynyl substituent can promote hydrogen-bonding interactions to increase the electrophilicity of the enal to react as a Michael acceptor, as observed in Jørgensen''s amine-catalyzed reactions.12 In our present study, a non-linear effect was observed regarding enantiomeric excesses of the NHC catalyst and the catalytic reaction product. The reaction enantioselectivity was also found to be sensitive to solvents and bases. These results suggested that the NHC and its azolium salt pre-catalyst (NHC·HX) played dual roles in our reaction: one is to activate the α-unsubstituted enal via the formation of the NHC-bound enolate intermediate,6 the other is to activate the α-alkynyl substituted enal via the acidic proton of the chiral NHC·HX (Fig. 1b, intermediate I & transition state TS-I).13 With respect to applications, carbon–carbon triple bonds are found in a good number of bioactive molecules such as cleviolide, (+)-prelaureatin, and oxamflatin (Fig. 1c).14 We demonstrated that our products containing these alkynyl units could be readily transformed into a diverse set of molecules.Cinnamaldehyde 1a and α-alkynyl enal 2a were chosen as the model substrates to search for suitable cross coupling reaction conditions (Table 1). The reactions were first carried out with Et3N as the base and THF as the solvent. When aminoindanol derived azoium salt A15 was used as the NHC pre-catalyst, the desired formal [4 + 2] product (3a) was obtained in a very encouraging yield (52%) with excellent ee and dr values (entry 1). The reactions appeared to be very sensitive to the structure of the NHC pre-catalysts, as similar azolium salts with N-phenyl or N–C6F5 substituents (B16 and C17) were completely ineffective, leading to no product formation (entries 2 & 3). Additional studies on the NHC pre-catalysts finally revealed that introduction of a Br substituent in the indane phenyl ring of the catalyst (D)18 led to 3a in 85% yield with 99% ee as nearly a single diastereomer (entry 4). Replacing Et3N with DIEA led to similar results (entry 5). Very interestingly, when the bases were replaced with DABCO or K3PO4, a significant drop in the enantioselectivity was observed (entries 6 & 7; see the ESI for more details). Changing the solvent from THF to CHCl3 or EtOAc has moderate effects on reaction yields (entries 8 & 9).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryNHCBaseSolventYieldb (%)Eec (%)Drd
1 A Et3NTHF5299>20 : 1
2 B Et3NTHF0
3 C Et3NTHF0
4 D Et3N THF 85 99 >20 : 1
5 D DIEATHF8398>20 : 1
6 D DABCOTHF7267>20 : 1
7 D K3PO4THF8079>20 : 1
8 D Et3NCHCl36497>20 : 1
9 D Et3NEtOAc6899>20 : 1
Open in a separate windowaUnless otherwise specified, the reactions were carried using 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), NHC (0.02 mmol), base (0.05 mmol) and solvent (1.0 mL) at rt for 24 h.bIsolated yield of 3a.cThe ee values were determined via HPLC on a chiral stationary phase.dDr values were determined via1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture.Our reactions are highly chemo-selective. Under all these conditions (Table 1), several possible side products were not formed. For example, possible adducts with enal 2a as the enolate precursor (to form 3a′ or 3a′′′) were not observed. This is not a complete surprise as α-substituted enals are unreactive azolium enolate intermediate precursors under NHC catalysis.11 Our results showed that mixing of enal 2a with highly reactive electrophiles (such as alkylidene diketone; see the ESI for more details) did not lead to any formal [2 + 4] addition product. Interestingly, the simple enal 1a did not behave as a Michael acceptor under our conditions, as homo-coupling adduct 3a′′ was not observed. In Scheidt''s elegant study, the introduction of a Lewis acid additive is necessary to activate one molecule of the enal to react as a Michael acceptor.8aOur further control experiments showed that when the α-alkynl substituent of 2a was replaced with an alkyl (e.g., Fig. 2, 2a1), vinyl (2a2), phenyl (2a3) or cyano (2a4) unit, the corresponding cross [2 + 4] reactions were not observed, with most of the starting materials remaining unchanged (for more details, see the ESI). It is clear that the alkynl unit present in enal 2a played more important roles than simply blocking the enal α-carbon to interrupt the π-conjugations. Although attempts to identify key intermediates (and possible non-covalent interactions) between the NHC catalysts and the two enals did not lead to conclusive mechanistic pictures, our experiments did show strong non-linear effects with respect to the optical purities of the NHC pre-catalyst and the reaction product (Fig. 3, see the ESI for more details).Open in a separate windowFig. 2Unsuccessful α-substituted enal substrates for the NHC catalytic chemo-selective cross [2 + 4] reactions.Open in a separate windowFig. 3Nonlinear effects with respect to the product ee and the catalyst ee values using different bases: (a) Et3N and (b) DABCO.Specifically, the reaction of 1a and 2a was studied by varying the enantiomeric purities of the NHC pre-catalyst D under the optimized reaction conditions as indicated in Table 1, entry 4 (Fig. 3). The ee values of the products and the ee values of the catalysts showed an obvious negative nonlinear effect (Fig. 3a). This nonlinear effect suggests that at least two catalysts are involved in the enantio-differentiating step of our reaction.19 It appears both of the enals (1a and 2a) are activated by NHC and/or its salt (NHC·HX) in our formal [2 + 4] reaction. It is well established that cinnamaldehyde (1a) can be activated by NHC to form an acylazolium enolate intermediate.6 We therefore propose that the other enal (2a) bearing an alkynyl unit is activated by the acidic proton from NHC·HX via non-covalent interactions. These non-covalent interactions between 2a and NHC·HX could be further supported by the “linear-effect” shown by the ee values of the products and the catalysts when using DABCO as the base (Fig. 3b). In this case, only one catalyst was involved in the enantio-differentiating step of our reaction, since the non-covalent H-bonding interactions between 2a and NHC·HX could be broken by a stronger base (e.g., DABCO, K3PO4, see the ESI for details) existing in the catalytic system. Similar activation of the α-alkynyl enal by a proton was proposed in Jørgensen''s amine-catalyzed reaction.11 In the field of NHC related catalysis, the use of NHC·HX as a H-bond donating catalyst has been demonstrated by Huang, Scheidt, Guin, and others.13The non-covalent interactions between the NHC pre-catalyst D and the alkynyl enal 2a can also be supported by 1H NMR analysis (Fig. 4). In the presence of the weak base Et3N, the acidic proton of the NHC pre-catalyst D shows an obvious change in the chemical shift after mixing with the alkynyl enal 2a (Fig. 4, a vs. b). Meanwhile, the chemical shift of the aldehyde proton of the substrate 2a is not changed in the same reaction system (a vs. c). These results support the existence of a non-covalent interaction between the NHC pre-catalyst D and the alkynyl enal 2a in our NHC organocatalytic reaction system (for more details, see the ESI).Open in a separate windowFig. 4Chemical shift of the acidic proton of the NHC pre-catalyst D under various conditions.We then examined the substrate scope using different enals (1) to react with 2a under the optimized reaction conditions indicated in Table 1, entry 4 (Scheme 1). Substituents could be installed at each position of the phenyl ring of the cinnamaldehyde 1a, with all the products afforded in moderate to excellent yields with excellent chemo-, enantio- and diastereoselectivities (3b to 3p). The β-phenyl rings of the enal substrates (1) could also be switched to a naphthyl group or heteroaromatic groups. The corresponding products were afforded in excellent enantioselectivities, although the yields or dr values dropped in these cases (3q to 3s). To our delight, aliphatic enals could also be used as the enolate precursors for this NHC catalyzed chemoselective reaction, with the desired products afforded in moderate yields with excellent dr and ee values (3t & 3u).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Scope of enals 1. aReaction conditions as stated in Table 1, entry 4. Yields are isolated yields after purification by column chromatography. Er values were determined via HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. bThe reaction was carried out on a 1.0 mmol scale based on 2a.The scope of the α-alkynyl enal substrates (2) was also examined (Scheme 2). Electron-donating substituents could be well tolerated on the β-phenyl rings of the α-alkynyl enals, with the desired products afforded in good yields with excellent ee values as single diastereomers (4a & 4b). The yields of the [2 + 4] products decreased when installing electron-withdrawing groups at any position of the β-phenyl rings, although the enantioselectivities were not affected (4c to 4f). The β-phenyl rings of the α-alkynyl enal substrates (2) could also be replaced with various heteroaromatic groups without obvious reduction in the product yields or stereoselectivities (4g & 4h). Substituents were also well tolerated on the phenyl rings attached to the alkynyl units of the enal substrates 2, with all the corresponding products afforded in moderate to good yields with excellent optical purities as single diastereomers (4i to 4p). Enal substrates 2 bearing heteroaromatic, aliphatic or terminal α-alkynyl groups also worked well in this reaction and gave the target products in moderate to good yields with excellent enantio- and diastereoselectivities (4q to 4w).Open in a separate windowScheme 2Scope of α-alkynyl enals 2. aReaction conditions as stated in Table 1, entry 4. Yields are isolated yields after purification by column chromatography. Er values were determined via HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. bThe reaction was carried out on a 6.4 mmol scale based on 2v (1.0 g).As a technical note, this chemo-selective reaction of α,β-unsaturated enals could be carried out on a large scale without reduction of the product ee or dr values, although the yields of the final products slightly dropped (e.g., Scheme 1, 3a & Scheme 2, 4v).Having examined the reaction scope with both of the enal reactants, we next seek to get additional insights into the reaction mechanism. Hammett studies20 were carried out using alkynyl enal substrates 2 bearing various p-substituents on the phenyl groups of the alkynyl units (Fig. 5). Alkynyl enal substrates 2 bearing 4-F (2i), 4-Cl (2j), 4-CF3 (2k), 4-CH3 (2l), and 4-OCH3 (2m) groups were chosen as the target substrates to evaluate their relative reaction rates compared with the alkynyl enal 2a. Kinetic studies showed that the substrates 2 bearing electron-withdrawing groups reacted faster than those bearing electron-donating groups (Fig. 5a). The Hammett plot of the relative reaction rates of the substrates 2i to 2m gave a positive slope (ρ = 1.0128). Therefore, a negatively charged transition state should be built up in the rate determining step of this [2 + 4] cycloaddition process. This is in accordance with the non-covalent H-bonding interactions that we have proposed to exist between the acidic proton of the NHC-precatalyst D and the alkynyl unit of the enal substrate 2 (Fig. 1b, TS-I, see the ESI for more details).Open in a separate windowFig. 5(a) Kinetic data and (b) Hammet plot for the competitive [2 + 4] cycloaddition reactions based on the σ values.Additionally, substrates 2x and 2y bearing steric bulky substituted phenyl groups on the alkynyl units were further examined for this NHC dual catalytic [2 + 4] cycloaddition reaction (Fig. 6). It is not surprising that the corresponding reaction products 4x and 4y were only afforded in poor yields with moderate ee values. Because the alkynly groups of the substrates 2x and 2y were shielded by the bulky mesityl and 2,6-diisopropylphenyl groups, the H-bonding interactions between the NHC pre-catalyst D and the alkynyl groups cannot be efficiently formed in these cases.Open in a separate windowFig. 6Reactions with enals 2 bearing bulky alkynyl substituents.The chiral alkynyl pyranone products obtained from this methodology are rich in functionalities for further synthetic transformations (Fig. 7). For instance, the alkynyl group in 3a could react with the adjacent phenyl group under the catalysis of Cu(OTf)2 to give tricyclic product 5 in a good yield without reduction of the optical purity.21 The terminal alkylnyl group in 4v could participate in various addition reactions and afford a variety of multi-functionalized alkene products in moderate to excellent yields with excellent ee values as single diastereomers (e.g., 6, 7, 8, 10).22 A click reaction between the alkynyl group in 4v and benzyl azide led to the formation of the chiral triazole product 9 in almost quantitative yield with excellent optical purity as a single diastereomer.22d The ethynyl group in 4v could be selectively reduced to an ethyl group with a Pd/C and CaCO3 catalyst in a hydrogen atmosphere (11). Pyranone 4w bearing a 2-trimethylsilylethynyl group could be coupled with 2-iodoaniline to give the indole product 12 in a moderate yield and diastereoselectivity with an excellent ee value.23Open in a separate windowFig. 7Synthetic transformations of the chiral pyranone products. aCuBr2, CH3CN, r.t.,1 h; bTogni reagent, TMSCN, Cu(OAc)2, terpyridine, CH3CN, 70 °C, 5 h; cTosNHNH2, FeCl3, TBHP, CH3CN, 80 °C, 8 h; dBnN3, sodium l-ascorbate, DCM/H2O (v/v = 1/1), r.t., 12 h; eNaI, TMSCl, H2O, CH3CN, r.t., 4 h; fPd/C, CaCO3, H2 (balloon), EtOH, r.t., 2 h.  相似文献   

15.
C–O bond cleavage is often a key process in defunctionalization of organic compounds as well as in degradation of natural polymers. However, it seldom occurs regioselectively for different types of C–O bonds under metal-free mild conditions. Here we report a facile chemo-selective cleavage of the α-C–O bonds in α-carboxy ketones by commercially available pinacolborane under the catalysis of diazaphosphinane based on a mechanism switch strategy. This new reaction features high efficiency, low cost and good group-tolerance, and is also amenable to catalytic deprotection of desyl-protected carboxylic acids and amino acids. Mechanistic studies indicated an electron-transfer-initiated radical process, underlining two crucial steps: (1) the initiator azodiisobutyronitrile switches originally hydridic reduction to kinetically more accessible electron reduction; and (2) the catalytic phosphorus species upconverts weakly reducing pinacolborane into strongly reducing diazaphosphinane.

Diazaphosphinyl radical-catalyzed chemo-selective deoxygenation of α-carboxy ketones with pinacolborane was achieved through the mechanism switch from direct to stepwise hydride transfer of diazaphosphinane.

The importance of reductive deoxygenation can be gauged by the wide use of Barton–McCombie deoxygenation in organic syntheses.1 Such C–O bond cleavage is also a crucial step in the degradation of natural polymers (e.g., sugars and lignins) to recycle sustainable resources.2 Consequently, a great variety of methodologies were explored for activation of these strong C–O bonds.3 Among them, deoxygenation of α-acyloxy ketones3b,c,4 (represented by benzoin derivatives, stemming from simple aldehydes via benzoin condensation5) has attracted considerable attention, because it may provide a facile way for accessing commonly useful building blocks (aryl ketones).6 As known, benzoin derivatives bear two types of C–O bonds—the carbonyl π-C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O bond and the benzyl σ-C–O bond (Scheme 1). While reduction of the carbonyl π-C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O bonds has been well established through transition metal-7 or Lewis acid-mediated8 hydride transfers, chemo-selective cleavage of the benzyl σ-C–O bonds is challenging and has seldom been achieved.9 The later process is occasionally seen, however, in some radical or electron reductions, but toxic tin hydrides1c or aggressive metal reagents (like Raney nickel,10 zinc dust,11etc.) are inevitably employed.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Possible reactive sites for benzoin reduction.The recent successful development of super electron donors (SEDs),4,12 which are defined as ground-state organic electron-donors capable of reducing aryl halides to aryl radicals or aryl anions,13 and photocatalytic systems3b,c may provide alternative protocols for reductive cleavage of the σ-C–O bonds in O-acetylated benzoin. However, these electron transfer-initiated reductions also suffer from some drawbacks, such as, excessive use of SEDs and their tedious synthetic procedures, expensive photoredox catalysts and ligands, and group-tolerance issues. In fact, there have been few reports to date on metal-free systems for efficiently catalytic deoxygenation with commercially available inexpensive reductants.3h Given the ubiquity of C–O bonds in nature, it is still an unmet need for development of efficient and economical methods for their degradation. N-Heterocyclic phosphines (NHPs)8c,14 have recently found plentiful applications in hydridic reductions8b,15 owing to their outstanding hydricity.16 However, this seems to blind one to search for their other promising reaction patterns, like radical and electron transfer reactivities. Up to now, the catalytic potential of NHPs in radical or electron reductions has never been explored. Given the logical understanding that a deliberately manipulated mechanism variation usually leads to diverse reactivity and selectivity, we anticipate that an intended mechanism switch for NHP-based reactions from the conventional hydride transfer to an alternative electron transfer might provide a chance for originally inaccessible chemo-selectivity in the reduction of the substrates bearing multiple reactive sites. As known from previous studies, NHPs could transfer a hydride ion to carbonyl C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O bonds to deliver the corresponding alcohol counterparts (Scheme 2a).8b This is indeed what we have seen. When NHPs are mixed with O-acetylated benzoins, an exclusive hydridic reduction of the carbonyl π-C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O bonds is observed, leaving the benzyl σ-C–O bonds intact. How could we make the propensity of NHP reduction to switch from the original hydridic path to a radical one? Inspired by our recent findings that NHPs are also capable of serving as good hydrogen-atom donors (by P–H bond homolysis) and their corresponding phosphinyl radicals are excellent electron donors17 (Scheme 2b, bottom), we envisioned that if phosphinyl radicals can be in situ generated, their super electron-donicity may promote the initial electron transfer to benzoin, and trigger the subsequent benzyl σ-C–O bond scission. If this is realizable, chemo-selective deoxygenation of benzoin derivatives with NHPs may be achieved via such a mechanism switch.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Chemical transformations of N-heterocyclic phosphines NHPs in reduction reactions.It is noted that the phosphorus species NHP-OR′ is produced in either the hydride or electron reduction of benzoin derivatives (Scheme 2c). Based on the previous knowledge that NHP-OR′ can be recycled back to NHP through a σ-bond metathesis between its exocyclic P–O bond and the B–H bond of pinacolborane (HBpin),8b we envisioned that the present deoxygenation may operate in a catalytic fashion with readily available HBpin as the terminal reductant to avoid the use of stoichiometric NHP. To verify this plot, we chose dimethyl 4,4′-(1-acetoxy-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)dibenzoate X as the testing substrate, and 1,3-di-tert-butyl-1,3,2-diazaphosphinane 1a as the catalyst based on its compatible reducing capacity (Scheme 3, for structure of 1a, cf.Table 1).17a It is observed that, under the previously established catalytic conditions for carbonyl reduction (20 mol% of 1a and 1.2 equiv. HBpin),8b the product X1 of hydridic reduction was obtained in 86% yield and 1 : 0.69 of diastereomer ratio in 12 h. On the other hand, when 10% azodiisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was added as a radical initiator, the σ-C–O bonds were, indeed, selectively cleaved to give the anticipated product X2 in 87% yield. This distinct chemo-selectivity did echo our proposed mechanism switch from the direct hydridic pathway to an electron reduction. In the following, we report this catalytic transformation in a more inclusive fashion. To our best knowledge, this is the first example of catalytic electron reduction mediated by NHPs.Optimization of reaction conditions for C–O bond cleavage
EntryCatalystConditionaYieldb
1 1a Standard condition92%
2 1a 10 mol% 1a62%
3 1b Standard condition<10%c
4 1c Standard condition<5%c
5 1d Standard condition<5%c
6 1e Standard condition46%
7 1a NH3BH3 as reductant<5%c
8 1a No AIBN<5%c
9 1a No heat<5%c
10Standard condition<5%c
Open in a separate windowaConditions for C–O bond activation: 2 (0.4 mmol), AIBN (0.04 mmol), 1a (0.08 mmol), HBpin (0.48 mmol) in toluene (1.0 mL).bIsolated yields.cNMR yields using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Chemo-selectively reductive cleavage of C–O bonds in O-acetylated benzoin X by diazaphosphinane 1a.To verify the necessity of each component in the above catalytic system, a series of comparative experiments were conducted. We commenced the condition optimization with simple O-acetylated benzoin 2a as the standard substrate – an attractive precursor for accessing α-aryl ketone which is a common pharmacophore and also present in numerous biologically active natural products.18 As shown in Table 1, treatment of 2a with 20 mol% catalyst 1a, 10 mol% initiator AIBN and 1.2 equiv. HBpin in toluene solution harvested the product 1,2-diphenylethanone 3a in 92% isolated yield (entry 1). Decreasing the catalyst loading led to an inferior result (62%, entry 2). Replacement of 1a with structurally similar 1b gave a much lower yield (<10%, entry 3), which is primarily because the weak reducing capacity of 1b-derived phosphinyl radical (Eox = −1.94 V vs. Fc in MeCN)17a prevents its electron transfer to 2a. The same reason can be applied to account for the poor results of 1c and 1d catalysts (<5%, entry 4 and 5). When a stronger hydride donor 1e was employed, a moderate yield (46%, entry 6) was obtained along with 40% byproduct of direct hydride transfer. This may be because enhancing the reducing ability of 1e can simultaneously accelerate its hydride transfer to carbonyl groups, which competes with the electron transfer between its derived phosphinyl radical and benzoin. Commercially available borane ammonia (NH3·BH3) was also examined, furnishing no desired product (<5%, entry 7). In addition, the absence of AIBN, heating or catalyst 1a cannot render efficient C–O bond cleavage (entry 8–10). Therefore, 20 mol% 1a, 10 mol% AIBN and 1.2 equiv. HBpin in toluene solution were eventually used as the standard conditions.Next, we explored the substrate scope starting with different benzoin derivatives 2 (Scheme 4). Besides the acetate, the reaction presented here also worked very well for other leaving groups, such as pivalate 2b, benzoate 2c and 4-cyanophenolate 2d, affording the product 1,2-diphenylethanone 3a in good to excellent yields (72–99%). Then, a series of benzoin derivatives with diverse substituents (2e–i) were synthesized to examine the functional group tolerance. As seen, the substrates with electron-withdrawing F (2e) and Cl (2f) groups gave almost quantitative yields (99%). Noteworthily, in contrast to the previously reported Ru-based photocatalytic deoxygenation,3b the reaction presented here could tolerate the ester group well and gave 3g in 87% yield. As for electron-donating substituents, such as methyl (2h) and methoxy groups (2i), the reaction yields were slightly reduced (72% and 75%), which may be ascribed to their lower reduction potentials. Replacement of the phenyl group with naphthyl (2j) afforded the product 3j in a good yield (80%). Furthermore, some cross-benzoin analogues were also investigated. The unsymmetrical counterpart 2k gave 3k in a moderate yield (62%). Similarly, heteroaromatic substrates (2l and 2m) generated corresponding products in 65% and 55% yields, respectively. Additionally, we examined the acyloin derivative 2n which was previously reported to give a base promoted aldol-type cyclization byproduct in the SED system.4 Notably, our conditions are mild enough for selective cleavage of its C–O bond in a moderate yield (52%), although 1a was necessarily employed as a stoichiometric reductant. However, the analogs 2o and 2p gave poor yields, possibly due to the less stability of their corresponding radical intermediates.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Substrate scope for C–O bond activation. Conditions unless otherwise specified: 2 (0.4 mmol), AIBN (0.04 mmol), 1a (0.08 mmol), HBpin (0.48 mmol) in toluene (1.0 mL). Isolated yields were given. [a] 0.4 mmol of 1a was used. [b] NMR yields using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.Desyl is a classical protection group in organic chemistry and biology.3c,19 We wondered whether the same reaction could serve as a practical strategy to realize catalytic deprotection of various desyl-protected carboxylic acids under metal-free conditions. To assess its feasibility, we tested some carboxylic acids, including aromatic, aliphatic, and amino acids. The results revealed a good tolerance for the present method. As shown in Scheme 5, the substrate 4a gave benzoic acid 5a in a quantitative yield (99%) under the standard conditions. And, the reaction was compatible well with the susceptive acetal moiety and furnished 5b in a good yield (88%). This result indicated the high selectivity of our system to the targeted C–O bond. Substrate 4c with electron-donating groups was also found feasible, and afforded the deprotected product 5c in a slightly lower yield (74%). Interestingly, for the isophthalic acid system whose two carboxylic groups were both protected by desyl groups, the deprotection was proved to be highly reactive, and afforded the fully-deprotected product 5d in an excellent yield (92%). 1-Naphthoic acid 5e could be obtained in a good yield of 85% after deprotection. Furthermore, the deprotection of aliphatic acids 4f furnished 5f in an almost quantitative yield (99%). However, similar 5g with an additional conjugated double bond was obtained in a diminished yield (71%). More importantly, our protocol is also applicable in amino acid systems. As seen, 5h was obtained in 90% yield with conformational retention, and the deprotection of 4i was not affected by other commonly-used protecting group Boc, giving the product 5i in 91% yield.Open in a separate windowScheme 5Substrate scope for catalytic deprotection with desyl as the protecting group. Conditions: 4 (0.4 mmol), AIBN (0.04 mmol), 1a (0.08 mmol), HBpin (0.48 mmol) in toluene (1.0 mL). Isolated yields were given. [a] 0.96 mmol of HBpin was used.Furthermore, we investigated the reaction mechanism by taking substrate 2a as the template compound. As previously established in SED systems, benzoin derivates were deemed to be reduced via a successive double-electron transfer mechanism, affording enolates as the intermediates which eventually captured a proton from the solvent.4 Different from this double-electron transfer pathway, our system would operate in a single-electron reduction mechanism, however. This was deduced from the fact that one equivalent reductant 1a could afford almost quantitative product 3a (eqn (1)). Consequently, the present process clearly displays a superiority in atom economy over the previous SED systems. With respect to the catalyst regeneration, we conducted the reaction of the intermediate 1a-OAc with HBpin in toluene-d8 at room temperature (eqn (2)). Through monitoring the 1H NMR and 31P NMR spectra of the reaction mixture, it is found that as the intermediate 1a-OAc gradually disappeared in about one hour (see ESI for details), 1a P–H bond was formed synchronously. This confirmed the effective regeneration of 1a from HBpin. Moreover, when 20 mol% 1a-OAc was used as the catalyst, the reduction could also work quite well to furnish the desired product in 63% yield (eqn (3)). Therefore, 1a-OAc can be regarded as an intermediate in the catalytic cycle to regenerate 1a. In addition, to exclude the possibility of a radical chain process, that is, a direct oxygen abstraction from benzoin by the phosphinyl radical, DFT calculations were conducted (see ESI for details). The results showed that 1a-[P]˙ and 1b-[P]˙ have a comparable ability in abstracting the oxygen atom (with an energy difference of 0.78 kcal mol−1, eqn (4)). This failed to explain the disparate yields for 1a and 1b systems (90% vs. <10%). Besides, the difference in the oxidation potentials of 1a-[P]˙ (Eox = −2.39 V) and of 1b-[P]˙ (Eox = −1.94 V)17a is consistent well with the observed diverse reduction results. All these preferentially support an electron-transfer initiated reduction.1234Based on the above control experiments and the computation, we outlined the catalytic cycle for reductive cleavage of C–O bonds in Scheme 6. The reaction is turned on by the isobutyronitrile radical, which abstracts a hydrogen-atom from diazaphosphinane 1a to produce the actual reductant phosphinyl radical. This potent electron donor (Eox = −2.39 V) then transfers an electron to 2a (Ered = ∼−2.3 V),3c,4 furnishing the ketyl radical anion 6 and the corresponding phosphonium cation. The σ-C–O bond of the intermediate 6 is readily cleaved to afford the ketyl 7 and acetate. The ketyl 7 would not be further reduced into the corresponding enolate, but instead abstracts a hydrogen-atom from 1a and simultaneously triggers the next catalytic cycle. Meanwhile, a combination of the stable phosphonium cation with acetate produces 1a-OAc, which could regenerate the catalyst 1a from the terminal reductant HBpin. Accordingly, the success of the present deoxygenation primarily attributes to two crucial factors: the mechanism switch from the originally hydridic reduction to a kinetically more accessible electron reduction by the initiator azodiisobutyronitrile, and the “upconversion” of weakly reducing HBpin into strongly reducing diazaphosphinane by catalytic phosphorus species.20 Moreover, in our systems, HBpin serves as both the electron and hydrogen-atom sources, namely the apparent hydride donor. This is different from what was known for the previous SED systems, in which the reductants only provide the electron, and hence, extraneous hydrogen sources are necessarily employed.Open in a separate windowScheme 6Proposed mechanism of C–O bond cleavage.  相似文献   

16.
Aurone-derived azadienes are well-known four-atom synthons for direct [4 + n] cycloadditions owing to their s-cis conformation as well as the thermodynamically favored aromatization nature of these processes. However, distinct from this common reactivity, herein we report an unusual formal migrative annulation with siloxy alkynes initiated by [2 + 2] cycloaddition. Unexpectedly, this process generates benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocyclic products with formal substituent migration. This observation is rationalized by less common [2 + 2] cycloaddition followed by 4π and 6π electrocyclic events. DFT calculations provided support to the proposed mechanism.

A HNTf2-catalyzed formal migrative cycloaddition of aurone-derived azadienes with siloxy alkynes has been developed to provide access to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridines.

Benzofuran is an important scaffold in biologically important natural molecules and therapeutic agents.1 Among them, benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocycles are particularly noteworthy owing to their broad spectrum of bioactivities for the treatment of various diseases (Fig. 1).2 Consequently, the development of efficient methods for their assembly has been a topic receiving enthusiastic attention from synthetic chemists.3 Notably, aurone-derived azadienes (e.g., 1) have been extensively employed as precursors toward these skeletons owing to their easy availability and versatile reactivity (Scheme 1a).3 The polarized conjugation system, combined with the preexisting s-cis conformation, has enabled them to serve as ideal annulation partners for the synthesis of nitrogen heterocycles of variable ring sizes. Moreover, the aromatization nature of these processes by forming a benzofuran ring provides additional driving force for them to behave as a perfect four-atom synthon for [4 + n] cycloaddition.3 In contrast, the use of such species as a two-atom partner for [2 + n] cycloaddition has been less developed.3c,k,4 Herein, we report a new migrative annulation leading to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridines of unexpected topology (Scheme 1b, with formal R2 migration), which is initiated by the less common [2 + 2] cycloaddition.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Benzofuran-fused N-heterocyclic natural and bioactive molecules.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of benzofuran-fused nitrogen heterocycles.Siloxy alkynes are another important family of building blocks in organic synthesis.5–8 The presence of a highly polarized C–C triple bond enables such molecules to serve as versatile two-carbon cycloaddition partners in various annulation reactions.5–7 In the above context and in continuation of our interest in the study of such electron-rich alkynes,7 we envisioned that the reaction between aurone-derived azadienes 1 and siloxy alkynes 2 should lead to facile electron-inversed [4 + 2] cycloaddition to form benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine products (Scheme 1b). Interestingly, the expected product 3′ from direct [4 + 2] cycloaddition was not observed. Instead, a dihydropyridine product 3 with formal R2 migration was observed. Careful analysis of the mechanism suggested that a [2 + 2] cycloaddition followed by 4π and 6π electrocyclic steps might be responsible for this unexpected product topology (vide infra).We began our investigation with the model substrates 1a and 2a, which were easily prepared in one step from aurone and 1-hexyne, respectively.8 Various Lewis acids were initially examined as potential catalysts for this cycloaddition (Table 1). Unfortunately, common Lewis acids (e.g., TiCl4, BF3·OEt2, Sc(OTf)3, In(OTf)3, and AgOTf) were all ineffective (entries 1–5). Substrate decomposition into an unidentifiable mixture was typically observed. However, further screening indicated that AgNTf2 served as an effective catalyst, leading to benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine 3a in 44% yield (entry 6). Careful analysis by X-ray crystallography confirmed that it was not formed by simple [4 + 2] cycloaddition, as the positions of the phenyl and the siloxy groups were switched (vs. the expected topology). The distinct catalytic performance of AgNTf2 (vs. AgOTf) suggested that the triflimide counter anion Tf2N might be important. However, further screening of various metal triflimide salts did not improve the reaction efficiency (entry 7). Instead, we were delighted to find that the corresponding Brønsted acid HNTf2 served as a better catalyst (57% yield, entry 8). However, triflic acid (TfOH) led to no desired product in spite of complete conversion (entry 9). After considerable efforts in the optimization of other reaction parameters, an improved yield of 75% was obtained with 2.5 mol% of HNTf2 and 2.5 equivalents of 2a at 60 °C (entry 10). Solvent screening indicated that the reaction proceeded faster in DCE with comparable yield (entry 11). However, other solvents were all inferior (entries 12–15). Finally, with a reversed order of addition of the two reactants, the yield was slightly improved (entry 16). We believe that this might be related to the relative decomposition rates of the substrates.Reaction conditionsa
EntryCatalystSolventTime (h)Yield (%)
1TiCl4DCM90
2BF3·OEt2DCM90
3Sc(OTf)3DCM90
4In(OTf)3DCM90
5AgOTfDCM90
6AgNTf2DCM944
7Sc(NTf2)3DCM90
8HNTf2DCM957
9HOTfDCM90
10bHNTf2DCM4275
11bHNTf2DCE1872
12bHNTf2CHCl31820
13bHNTf2THF180
14bHNTf2MeCN180
15bHNTf2EtOAc180
16b,cHNTf2DCE1881 (76)d
Open in a separate windowa 2a (0.06 mmol) was added to the solution of 1a (0.05 mol) and the catalyst (10 mol%). Yield was determined by analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude mixture using CH2Br2 as an internal standard.bRun with 2.5 mol% catalyst and 2.5 equiv. of 2a at 60 °C.c 1a was added into the solution of 2a and the catalyst.dYield in parentheses was isolated yield.With the optimized conditions, we examined the reaction scope. A range of aurone-derived azadienes with different electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents at various positions smoothly participated in this formal migrative cycloaddition process with siloxy alkyne 2a (Scheme 2). The corresponding benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine products 3 were formed with excellent selectivity and moderate to good efficiency. A thiophene unit was also successfully incorporated into the product (3h). However, substitution with a pyridinyl group shut down the reactivity, even with 1.1 equivalents of HNTf2. Other siloxy alkynes bearing different alkyl substituents on the triple bond were also good reaction partners, except that these reactions were more efficient when the catalyst loading was increased to 10 mol% (Table 2). Unfortunately, direct aryl substitution on the alkyne triple bond resulted in essentially no reaction (entry 7). Notably, in spite of the strong acidic conditions, various functional groups, such as TIPS-protected alcohol (3p) and acetal (3c), were tolerated. Moreover, increasing steric hindrance in close proximity to the reaction centers (e.g., tBu group in 3i and 3r) did not obviously affect the reaction efficiency.Scope of siloxyl alkynesa
EntryR 3 Yield (%)
1 3m 66
2 3n 74
3 3o 53b
4 3p 64
5 3q 58
6 3r 62
7 3s <5
Open in a separate windowaConditions: 1d (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.75 mmol), HNTf2 (10 mol%), DCE (3 mL), 60 °C. Isolated yield.bRun with 2.5 mol% of HNTf2.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Scope of aurone-derived azadienes. Conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.75 mmol), HNTf2 (2.5 mol%), DCE (3.0 mL), 60 °C. Isolated yield.Owing to the electron-rich silyl enol ether motif, the benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine products can be transformed into other related heterocycles upon treatment with electrophiles. For example, deprotection of the silyl group in 3d with TBAF in the presence of water produced ketone 4a (eqn (1)). In the presence of NBS or NCS, the corresponding bromoketone 4b and chloroketone 4c were obtained, respectively (eqn (2)). These reactions were both efficient and highly diastereoselective. The structures of 4b and 4c were also confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Moreover, deprotection of the N-tosyl group with Li/naphthalene followed by air oxidation led to the highly-substituted benzofuran-fused pyridine 5, the core structure of a family of bioactive molecules (eqn (3)).2A possible mechanism is proposed to rationalize the unusual formal migrative process (Scheme 3). The reaction begins with LUMO-lowering protonation of the aurone-derived azadiene 1 by HNTf2.9 Then, the electron-rich alkyne attacks the resulting activated iminium intermediate I, leading to ketenium ion II after intermolecular C–C bond formation. Subsequent intramolecular cyclization from the electron-rich enamine motif to the electrophilic ketenium unit forms oxetene III. The formation of this oxetene can also be considered as a [2 + 2] cycloaddition of the two reactants.6ad,11 Subsequent 4π-electrocyclic opening of oxetene III affords azatriene IV. Further 6π-electrocyclic closing leads to the observed product 3. This observed product topology is fully consistent with this pathway. It is worth noting that the excellent performance with HNTf2 might be attributed to the low nucleophilicity and good compatibility of its counter anion with the highly electrophilic cationic intermediates (e.g., ketenium II) in this process. We have also carried out DFT studies. The results indicated that the proposed pathway is energetically viable and consistent with the experimental data (Scheme 3 and Fig. S1). Moreover, some other possible pathways that engage the nitrogen atom in intermediate II to directly attack the ketenium in a [4 + 2] mode were explored. However, no reasonable transition state could be located (Fig. S2). Thus, the origin of preference toward [2 + 2] cycloaddition remains unclear.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Proposed mechanism and free energies (in kcal mol−1) computed at the M06-2X(D3)/6-311G(d,p)-SMD//M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of theory.We also prepared TIPSNTf2 and examined its catalytic activity in this reaction since it is known that such a Lewis acid might be generated in situ.10 However, no reaction was observed when TIPSNTf2 was used in place of HNTf2, suggesting that it is unlikely the actual catalyst. Finally, in order to probe the nature of the substituent migration (intermolecular vs. intramolecular), we carried out a cross-over experiment (Scheme 4). Under the standard conditions, the reaction using a 1 : 1 mixture of 1d and 1k led to exclusive formation of 3d and 3k, without detection of any cross-over products. This result is consistent with the proposed intramolecular migration pathway.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Cross-over experiment.In conclusion, we have discovered an unusual formal migrative cycloaddition of aurone-derived azadienes with siloxy alkynes. In the presence of a catalytic amount of HNTf2, this reaction provided expedient access to a range of useful benzofuran-fused dihydropyridine products with unexpected topology, distinct from normal [4 + 2] cycloaddition. Although aurone-derived azadienes are ideal four-atom synthons for direct [4 + n] cycloaddition, the present process is initiated by less common [2 + 2] cycloaddition, which is critical for the observed product formation. Subsequent electrocyclic opening and cyclization steps provide a reasonable rationale. The heterocyclic products generated from this process are precursors toward other useful structures, such as benzofuran-fused pyridines.  相似文献   

17.
Mercury porosimetry and in situ high pressure single crystal X-ray diffraction revealed the wine-rack CUK-1 MOF as a unique crystalline material capable of a fully reversible mechanical pressure-triggered structural contraction. The near-absence of hysteresis upon cycling exhibited by this robust MOF, akin to an ideal molecular spring, is associated with a constant work energy storage capacity of 40 J g−1. Molecular simulations were further deployed to uncover the free-energy landscape behind this unprecedented pressure-responsive phenomenon in the area of compliant hybrid porous materials. This discovery is of utmost importance from the perspective of instant energy storage and delivery.

Mercury porosimetry and in situ high pressure single crystal X-ray diffraction revealed the wine-rack CUK-1 MOF as a unique crystalline material capable of a fully reversible mechanical pressure-triggered structural contraction.

Reducing the world''s fossil fuel dependence is the focus of many global initiatives,1 aiming to mitigate the effects of climate change through tapping into sustainable energy resources such as solar and wind power. However, increasing reliance on these renewable energy sources has introduced difficulties due to the offset between power availability and demand peaks. Complementary technologies are necessary to alleviate intermittent supply, such as peaking power plants, demand-side energy management, or large scale energy storage.2 The latter is particularly desirable as it can decouple electricity production and consumption, however the lack of a “one size fits all” approach has led the scientific community to envisage unconventional energy storage strategies.One such avenue emerging in recent years is the storage of mechanical energy via the compression of a suitable stimuli-responsive system, either through the intrusion of a non-wetting fluid into hydrophobic porous frameworks,3 or by means of application of an external pressure on flexible materials.4The former approach, first pioneered using water intrusion in zeolites and silicas,11 has recently been extended to small pore zeolitic imidazolate frameworks.12 Unfortunately, besides requiring highly hydrophobic systems, water intrusion achieves a relatively low stored energy density,3 of around 3–25 J g−1. The second strategy takes advantage of the compliant nature of bulk materials. Energy is stored through structural deformations, manifesting as continuous or sudden volume changes under external pressure. The energy stored in flexible materials over a compression/decompression cycle can be an order of magnitude higher compared to the values achieved using fluid intrusion in rigid porous systems.13 In theory, three types of pressure-induced structural behaviour can be envisioned for such a responsive system. If the structure contraction is non-reversible, all energy is dissipated and the system is categorized as a nano-shock absorber (Fig. 1b). For structural changes that are reversible upon decompression two families of system can be distinguished, i.e. a nano-damper (Fig. 1c) or an ideal nano-spring (Fig. 1d) when the pV curves show hysteresis or fully overlap, respectively.14Open in a separate windowFig. 1(A) Schema of mechanical energy storage in compliant crystalline materials, implying a unit cell volume change between open (op) and contracted (cp) structures, and prototypical pressure-volume curves of stimuli-responsive materials under mechanical pressure for (B) nano-shock absorbers, exemplified by MIL-53(Al),5 MIL-53(Ga)-FA6 and ZIF-4(Zn),7 (C) nano-dampers e.g. MIL-53(Cr),8 MIL-47(V)9 and MIL-53(Al)-FA10 and (D) nano-springs, insofar exhibited exclusively by CUK-1 presented herein.Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of porous, crystalline materials comprised of metal vertices interconnected by organic linkers, are known to exhibit responsiveness to a variety of stimuli,15,16 including external pressure.17 Recently, several frameworks of this family of hybrid materials have been shown to act as energy storing nano-dampers or energy dissipative nano-shock absorbers, as is the case for the highly flexible MIL-53(M)5,8,10 and MIL-47(V)9 series and more recently ZIF-4(Zn)7 (see Fig. 1b and c for their related structural behaviours). In such flexible crystalline materials compression is associated with a displacive phase transition between distinct structures of differing unit cell volumes, denoted as open (op) and contracted (cp) forms15,16 and illustrated in Fig. 1a, occurring reversibly or irreversibly for a nano-damper or nano-shock absorber, respectively. The considerable stored energy associated with this transition, in the range of 30–200 J g−1 (up to 4 kJ g−1 for shock absorbers18) is highly attractive from the perspective of mechanical energy storage. However, the hysteretic compression/decompression curve characterising known nano-damper MOFs leads to a partial loss of work energy, lowering the potential storage efficiency, as well as creating issues through heat dissipation. Insofar, the search for a ideal spring-like crystalline material, capable of reversible pressure-induced structural switching without any hysteresis (Fig. 1d) has been fruitless, precluding their applicability for efficient, high density energy storage applications. Herein, a subtle combination of Hg-porosimetry, high-pressure single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) and molecular simulations reveals the 1D-channel CUK-1 (M, M = Co, Mg)19 MOF as the first compliant hybrid porous material with a spring-back mechanical breathing behaviour.Such unique mechanically-triggered structural response implies a continuous pore contraction/expansion between op and cp forms in a narrow pressure range of 280–290 MPa, accompanied by a unit cell volume change of 20.9%. This optimal scenario paves the way towards fast energy storage/delivery system of about 40 J g−1. The channel-like CUK-1(M) composed of chains of μ3-OH/O edge and vertex sharing metal octahedra (M = Co,19 Mg20) coordinated by bidentate 2,4-pyridinedicarboxylic ligands, recently emerged as an attractive porous material owing to its promising sorption performance combined with environmentally-friendly hydrothermal synthesis and high thermal and chemical stability.20–22 Its wine-rack topology and its relatively rigid behaviour upon guest adsorption are reminiscent to that of MIL-47(V) a MOF which interestingly underwent a hysteretic, reversible structural contraction upon exerting an external pressure of 125 MPa,9 associated with a stored/delivered energy of 33 J g−1. Inspired by our previous findings on MIL-47(V), we deliberately explored the pressure-induced structural behaviour of CUK-1 in its isostructural Co and Mg forms. MOF synthesis was performed according to the protocol detailed in ESI. Phase purity was confirmed by powder XRD (Fig. S3, S4 and Table S1) while their textural features, including BET area and pore volume, were found to match previously reported data.19,20Mercury intrusion curves were recorded on the powder samples up to a maximum of 413 MPa as shown for CUK-1(Co) in Fig. 2, its Mg variant being reported in Fig. S6, ESI, together with full experimental details. A substantial amount of Hg intrudes at low pressure (<10 MPa), due to compaction of the crystals and filling of inter-particle porosity. This is followed by a sudden volume change at 281 MPa where a sharp step is observed (see inset of Fig. 2). By analogy with the conclusions previously drawn for the series of MIL-53(M)/MIL-47(V) frameworks,5,8–10 this intruded Hg volume increase is associated with a structural contraction of CUK-1(Co), as its channel size (approx. 6.6 Å) is an order of magnitude below the pore dimension where non-wetting mercury can intrude in this pressure range (at 52 Å). The extrusion curve shows a near-perfect overlap, indicating that the framework behaves as an ideal spring, with no hysteresis between the intrusion/extrusion branches.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Sequential mercury intrusion–extrusion curves on CUK-1(Co) powder, in blue line and red, respectively. Line is a guide for eye. Volume below 1 MPa corresponds to powder compaction and intercrystallite void filling. Dotted horizontal lines demarcate contraction lower and upper bounds. Inset highlights the intrusion step in a linear scale with the op/cp contraction marked with an arrow.Moreover, this behaviour is highly repeatable, as confirmed by four consecutive pressure cycles (in Fig. S5). Interestingly, the same behaviour also holds true for CUK-1(Mg) (Fig. S6), with a similar intrusion pressure of 288 MPa. Since the two metal ions show relatively similar ionic radius (Co2+: 1.50(7) Å and Mg2+: 1.41(7) Å),24 the averaged metal–oxygen distance is nearly identical in their corresponding coordination: spheres: (Co–O: 2.107(20) Å and Mg–O: 2.073(20) Å). Such analogous metal-linker bond strength is most likely at the origin of the very similar pressure-induced response of the two materials. The high transition pressure of CUK-1(Co) underpins the inability of guest adsorption to induce a breathing effect as observed previously.20,21 Indeed, the adsorption stresses encountered throughout guest insertion are simply insufficient to overcome the energetic penalty of transition.14,25 The 0.143 mL g−1 volume change associated with the observed step in the CUK-1(Co) intrusion curve corresponds to a 20.9% change in unit cell volume, lower than in the similar phenyl-based MIL-47(V) of 43%.9 However, the stored energy calculated through W = P × ΔV is 40 J g−1, 20% larger than the value reported for MIL-47(V)9 of 33 J g−1. Here, the higher pressure of CUK-1(Co) switching, 281 MPa vs. 125 MPa for MIL-47(V) balances out the ΔV term. Moreover, owing to its relatively dense framework, the volumetric energy density of CUK-1(Co) remains attractive when compared to water intrusion systems (Table S4).Considering an initial unit cell volume for the CUK-1(Co) op form of 2467 Å3 from PXRD (see ESI), the resulting cp form is estimated to exhibit a unit cell volume of 1950 Å3, based on the Hg intruded volume increase at 281 MPa. In order to directly observe the contracted form and identify the mechanism underpinning these intriguing dynamics, high pressure SC-XRD experiments were carried out in a membrane diamond anvil cell (mDAC). Individual CUK-1(Co) crystals were placed in a gasket between the polished diamonds of the mDAC, and immersed in a hydrostatic pressure transmitting medium of silicone oil AP-100, with a gold flake used to monitor inner mDAC pressure (full single crystal synthesis conditions and SC-XRD methodology available in the ESI).At ambient pressure, the indexed unit cell volume of the initial op form of CUK-1(Co) is nearly identical (2492 Å3) to that of the previously reported20 dehydrated monoclinic phase (2466.72 Å3). Upon increasing DAC pressure to around 0.3 GPa, a volume contraction to the cp phase begins, which is in line with Hg porosimetry experiments. Reflections obtained from integrated 2D diffraction images were used to solve the pressure-induced structure through a dual space recycling algorithm in an expanded P1 setting, then further refined on F2 using the SHELX suite26 (complete data treatment methodology available in the ESI). The structure maintains the same C2/c space group throughout the transition between the two forms, and as such the spring-like dynamics of the framework can be described as a continuous contraction in a narrow pressure range. Above 0.5 GPa, the cp form is attained, with further pressure application leading to a linear decrease of its unit cell volume by 4% up to 1.8 GPa (Fig. 3).Open in a separate windowFig. 3Evolution of the CUK-1(Co) unit cell volume determined through indexation of Bragg reflections as a function of applied pressure as recorded in a DAC. Unit cell parameters corresponding to each pressure point can be found in Table S5, ESI.The unit cell dimensions of the solved cp form at 0.5 GPa are provided in Table 1, alongside as-indexed pristine op form parameters with Fig. 4a illustrating the two structures. The anisotropic transition is similar in nature to that of MIL-53(M)/MIL-47(V), characterised by a compaction in the b-direction (from approx. 13 Å to 9 Å) and an elongation along the a-axis (from 18 to nearly 20 Å). The change in the c-parameter is minimal, with only a slight increase, as it lies in the plane of the highly rigid octahedrally coordinated metal chains. A lowering of the angle (from 103 to 99°) is also observed, as the 1D parallel pores are straightened via the linker-induced torsion. A table comparing specific atomic distances, angles and torsions in the two forms is available in Table S7, ESI. The unit cell volume of the identified cp phase at 0.5 GPa of 1972 Å3 is only slightly higher than the value estimated from porosimetry measurements (as 1950 Å3). We attribute this offset to the different interactions of the crystal surface with the respective pressure transmitting medium (mercury vs. silicone oil), as observed previously.5Crystallographic data of the pristine (op) and high pressure (cp) phases as determined from the CUK-1(Co) SC-XRD
Formopacpb
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space group C2/c (no. 15) C2/c (no. 15)
a (Å)18.024(15)19.6026(9)
b (Å)13.089(3)9.2017(9)
c (Å)10.883(13)11.0368(3)
β (°)103.92(12)99.434(3)
Unit cell volume (Å3)2492(4)1963.8(2)
Open in a separate windowaAs indexed before pressure application.bAs solved at 0.5 GPa, Rint = 3.08, R1 = 5.53, wR2 = 16.51.Open in a separate windowFig. 4(A) Comparison of the structures of the op and cp forms of CUK-1(Co), corresponding to applied pressure of 0 GPa and 0.5 GPa, respectively, with corresponding pore limiting diameters. (B) Close-up of two adjacent linkers coordinated to the metal chains, highlighting their pivoting motion: [H] a carboxylic group hinge, with the O–O axis acting as a kneecap identical to that of MIL-53(Cr),23 and [H’] a dual carboxylic group – pyridine nitrogen hinge with the axis of rotation offset through the Co atom. (C) Concerted linker motion displayed alongside the c axis, highlighting the phenyl–phenyl distances in the two forms. Cobalt atoms/tetrahedra, oxygen, carbon and nitrogen atoms are depicted in orange, red, light grey and light blue, respectively, with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.A careful inspection of the op/cp structures suggests that the unique spring-like behaviour of the CUK-1 framework under pressure can be related to the position and concerted motion of its linkers upon compaction. The asymmetric linker coordination of the pyridine nitrogen to the Co–O chains results in a dual-hinged pivot, while the opposing carboxylic group adopts a single hinge configuration as in MIL-53 (H′ and H in Fig. 4b).In conjunction with alternating connectivity in both the b and c-crystallographic axes, as depicted in Fig. 4c, the corrugated channels maintain a similar separating distance between adjacent linkers throughout contraction (4.7 Å to 4.4 Å). The aromatic stacking interactions are therefore much weaker than those encountered between facing phenyl rings in the cp forms of MIL-53(M)/MIL-47(V), (separating distances lower than 4 Å) which all show irreversible or hysteretic behaviours upon pressure release.8–10 Such a conformation is expected to lower the relative stability of the cp form of CUK-1, rendering possible a complete reversibility of the cp/op transition.In order to gain further insight into the mechanical behaviour of CUK-1, we computed the internal energy of CUK-1(Mg) as a function of unit cell volume at 0 K using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The Mg variant was chosen for this computational investigation because Co is a transition metal with a high spin state in CUK-1 resulting in an electronic structure that is much more difficult to resolve using standard DFT. The calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)27 with the PBE-D3(BJ)28,29 functional (details in the ESI) and the results are shown in Fig. 5.Open in a separate windowFig. 5Internal energy of the CUK-1(Mg) framework as a function of its unit cell volume at 0 K computed at the DFT level.The profile reveals a single minimum located at around 2500 Å3 which can hence be identified as the op form. No local minimum is present at a lower unit cell volume, which is consistent with the experimental observation of a pressure-induced reversible contraction. However, the profile does exhibit an inflection point in the volume range of 1800–2000 Å3, which fits with the dimension of the cp form observed experimentally. As was mentioned before, dispersion interactions between stacking aromatic linkers has been put forward as the driving force for structural transitions in MOFs such as MIL-53(Al). In previous theoretical work30 it was concluded that the contribution of dispersion to the DFT energy difference between the op and cp states of MIL-53(Al) heavily depends on the applied level of theory, making it very difficult to make quantitative statements about dispersion contribution from DFT calculations at this point. However, we herein assume we can still make a qualitative comparison between two different materials (i.e. MIL-53(Al) and the present CUK-1) using the same level of theory. In this light, we found from the aforementioned theoretical work that the dispersion contribution for MIL-53(Al) at the PBE-D3(BJ) level of theory amounts to 138 J g−1 (145 kJ mol−1 per unit cell) which is responsible for stabilizing the cp state ultimately resulting in an irreversible transition. In the present case of CUK-1, our DFT calculations using the same functional showed that the contribution of the dispersion to the energy difference between the op state (chosen at 2500 Å3) and the cp state (chosen at 1900 Å3) is only 84 J g−1 (110 kJ mol−1 per unit cell). As the dispersion contribution for CUK-1 is much lower than for MIL-53(Al), we can interpret this as a lower degree of stabilization of the cp form. This, in combination with the deformation energy required for the linker staggering that was mentioned before and illustrated in Fig. 4, prevents the contracted form from being a metastable state and hence promotes the ideal spring-like behaviour.As the energy profile exhibits an inflection point at the contracted pore volume range, a volume versus pressure response derived from this profile would reveal hysteresis in the transition pressures, which is not in agreement with the ideal-spring behaviour observed experimentally. However, the DFT profile was computed at 0 K, while the experiments were performed at room temperature. Therefore, we derived a force field for CUK-1(Mg) using QuickFF31 (more details on the force field derivation can be found in the ESI) and computed the free energy at 300 K as a function of unit cell volume from molecular dynamics simulations using a protocol outlined in earlier work.14 The corresponding pressure profile (shown in Fig. S8a of the ESI) indicates a reversible transition lacking any hysteresis, in excellent agreement with the experimentally observed ideal-spring behaviour for this solid. Finally, upon decomposing the free energy into internal energy and entropy (see Fig. S8b of the ESI), we found that the entropic contributions stabilize the op phase (or equivalently destabilize the cp phase), which further enhances the ideal spring-like behaviour.  相似文献   

18.
Redox-active benzimidazolium sulfonamides as thiolating reagents have been developed for reductive C–S bond coupling. The IMDN-SO2R reagent provides a bench-stable cationic precursor to generate a portfolio of highly active N–S intermediates, which can be successfully applied in cross-electrophilic coupling with various organic halides. The employment of an electrophilic sulfur source solved the problem of catalyst deactivation and avoided odorous thiols, featuring practical conditions, broad substrate scope, and excellent tolerance.

Redox-active benzimidazolium sulfonamides as thiolating reagents have been developed for reductive C–S bond coupling.

The high frequency of sulfur-containing moieties in natural products,1 bioactive molecules,2 pharmaceuticals,3 organic materials,4 fragrances5 and asymmetric catalysis as chiral catalysts/ligands6 has triggered the best endeavours for the selective construction of C–S bonds. The conventional cross-coupling of thiols with aryl halides generally relies on the conversion of mercaptans to thiolates by means of transition-metal catalysis7 (such as Pd,8 Cu,9 and Ni10) and other metals,11 although these efforts were plagued by several drawbacks. The strong coordination of thiolates to metals often leads to catalyst deactivation and displays low efficiencies. Therefore, high catalyst loading, specific ligands, excessive heating and strong bases are often required to facilitate this transformation (Scheme 1a, left). Recent development using photochemical12 and electrochemical13 induced thiol radicals as a sulfur source could avoid the problem of catalyst poisoning, although restricted substrate scope was displayed (Scheme 1a, middle). Despite the progress made for C–S bond construction,14 the longstanding issues that exist in the above-mentioned strategies should not be overlooked.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Origin of the reaction design. (a) C–S formation from organic halides. (b) The preparation of the electrophilic thiolating reagent (R–S+). (c) This work: cationic active reagent for cross electrophilic coupling.Compared to classical cross-coupling processes, the nickel-catalyzed reductive cross-coupling of two electrophilic partners has emerged as a powerful tool for the replacement of air- and moisture-sensitive organometallic reagents.15 The cross electrophilic coupling for the construction of C–S bonds is more challenging due to the lack of sulfur sources and homo-coupling of organic halides (Scheme 1a, right). Several examples of reductive thiolation16 have been described using thiol derivatives as S+ sources (Scheme 1b). We speculated that readily accessible sulfonyl chloride as an electrophilic sulfur source could avoid the use of highly toxic thiols and significantly the substrate scope.17 However, the direct reduction of sulfonyl chloride inevitably resulted in dimerization to disulfide.17b Putatively, activated by an electron-deficient heterocycle such as imidazole, sulfonyl chloride could be assembled into a bench-stable cationic reagent (Scheme 1b). Benzimidazolium sulfonamides would be better electron acceptors18 and easily reduced by PPh3 to generate a highly reactive N–S+ species in situ. The positive charge of this intermediate is delocalized on both nitrogens of imidazole. Followed by the cleavage of the weak N–S bond (BDE ≈ 70 kcal mol−1),19 the electrophilic sulfur species can be captured by metal catalysts for cross-coupling. Herein, we have described a redox-active benzimidazolium sulfonamide reagent (IMDN-SO2R) for Ni-catalyzed reductive coupling of organic halides for a portfolio of C(sp)–S, C(sp2)–S and C(sp3)–S bond formations (Scheme 1c). This strategy avoids the formation of disulfide by-products and the use of organometallic reagents, which facilitates purification and enhances the functionality tolerance.To determine the suitable conditions for the reductive coupling of the cationic reagent with organic halides, we first studied the reductive thiolation of p-iodo-methoxybenzene (2a) and 1a (2 equiv.) with a survey of Ni catalysts in the presence of dtbbpy (20 mol%), PPh3 (2.5 equiv.), Zn powder (3.0 equiv.) and MgCl2 (2.0 equiv.) in DMA at 60 °C (Table 1). Ni(OTf)2 as a catalyst was able to promote the reductive process to afford the desired aryl thioether product 3a in 92% isolated yield (entry 1). When using Ni(cod)2, Ni(acac)2, Ni(OAc)2·4H2O and Ni(PCy3)2Cl2, lower yields were obtained (entries 2–5). Decreasing the 1a loading to 1.5 equiv., the yield of 3a reduced to 75% (entry 6). Switching 1a to a 2-phenyl substituted imidazolium sulfonamide reagent 1b, similar yields were achieved (entry 7). When decreasing both Ni(OTf)2 and dtbbpy loading to 10 mol%, the yield reduced to 75%. In the absence of Ni(OTf)2 or Zn powder, no desired product was observed (entries 9–10). Switching Zn powder to an organic reductant tetrakis-(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE), still a low conversion of the reaction was observed (entry 11). The results demonstrated that no organozinc reagents were generated. In the absence of the ligand, MgCl2 or PPh3, the reaction resulted in low yields, indicating that these ingredients were essential for this catalytic system (entries 12–14). Thus, the optimized conditions were selected for further investigation of the reaction scope.Optimization of the reaction conditions. Reaction condition: 2a (0.20 mmol), 1a (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), MgCl2 (2.0 equiv.), PPh3 (2.5 equiv.), Zn (3.0 equiv.), Ni(OTf)2 (20 mol%) and dtbbpy (20 mol%) in DMA (2 mL) at 60 °C under Ar. aCrude yields determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using dibromomethane as an internal standard. bIsolated yield. dtbbpy = 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine. TDAE = tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene
EntryVariationYielda/%EntryVariationYielda/%
1None96 (92)b810 mol% [Ni]83
2Ni(acac)2429No Ni(OTf)2nd
3Ni(cod)26310No Znnd
4Ni(OAc)2·4H2O2111TDAE for Zn21
5Ni(PCy3)2Cl25712No dtbbpy46
61.5 equiv. 1a7513No MgCl239
72.0 equiv. 1b8814No PPh320
Open in a separate windowThe generality of the reductive thiolation was evaluated under the optimized conditions (Scheme 2). A wide range of aryl iodides containing either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating functionality were tolerated, delivering products with methoxy (3a, 3c), trifluoromethoxy (3b), methyl (3d), acetyl (3e), ester (3f), boronate (3g), and phenyl (3h) groups in good to excellent yields (63–94%). 5-Iodobenzo[d][1,3]dioxole and 2-iodofluorene also furnished the corresponding adducts (3i, 3j) in 91% and 82% yields, respectively. Notably, aryl iodides bearing sensitive groups such as amine (3k) and hydroxyl (3l) were engaged in the cross-coupling to forge the C–S bond in good yields. Aryl bromides (3a, 3m) were also found compatible. The scope of the heteroaryl halide coupling partner was also explored. Various five- and six-membered heterocycles, including thiophene (3n), pyrazole (3o), quinoline (3p), carbazole (3q), indole (3r), isothiazole (3s), benzofuran (3t), benzothiophene (3u), benzothiazole (3v), pyrimidine (3w), pyrazine (3x), and pyridine (3y, 3z) derived heteroaryl bromides and iodides were treated with 1a to produce the corresponding sulfides in good yields. In the cases of relatively unreactive organic chlorides, the corresponding coupling products (3aa–3cc) could be obtained in low yields under the standard conditions. Subsequently, we assessed the scope of aryl sulfonamides. Reagents 1c–1k containing electron-withdrawing and electron-donating substitutions on the benzene ring afforded the desired products in good to excellent yields (3dd–3ll). Sterically hindered imidazolium sulfonamides 2,4,6-trimethylated 1j and 2,4,6-triisopropylated 1k showed good compatibility in this reaction to give the corresponding products 3kk and 3ll in high yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Substrate scope of (hetero)aryl and benzimidazolium sulfonamides. aReaction was performed at 80 °C.The more challenging aliphatic halides have also been examined with the redox-active reagent 1a (Scheme 3). Primary and secondary alkyl halides yielded alkyl sulfides (5a–5k and 5l) in good to excellent yields. No dimerization side-product was observed. Functionalities including esters (5b, 5i, and 5j), sulfide (5c), alkene (5f), acetal (5h) and ether (5k) are tolerated. Some sensitive functional groups including silyl ether (5e) and organoboronate (5g) were well tolerated, provided in 75% and 57% yields, respectively. Alkenyl halides were also tolerated to afford 7a and 7b in good yields. In addition, alkynyl bromides were employed for reductive thiolation with benzimidazolium sulfonamides 1a and 1c–1i to afford the corresponding C(sp)–S bond coupling products (9a–9h) in moderate to good yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Substrate scope of alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl bromide. aNi(PCy3)2Cl2 instead of Ni(OTf)2 and without dtbbpy. b4-(Trifluoromethyl)pyridine (0.2 mmol) and THF (2 mL) were used instead of dtbbpy and DMA.To demonstrate the synthetic potential of this cross-electrophile coupling, a gram scale reaction was performed with 1a and p-iodo-methoxybenzene 2a under the standard conditions (Scheme 4a). The reductive thiolation was also applied in the late-stage modification of biologically active molecules and synthesis of pharmaceutically active molecules. d-Glucose (10a), (+)-α-tocopherol (10b), rosin amine (10c), and 17a-methyl-drostanolone-derived (10d) alkyl halides were compatible to afford thiolated products in good yields (Scheme 4b). Treating benzimidazolium sulfonamide 1n with piperazine-derived iodobenzene 11 generated the thiolated intermediate 12 and deprotection with TFA afforded anti-depressive vortioxetine 13 (ref. 20) in 50% overall yields (Scheme 4c).Open in a separate windowScheme 4Further transformations. (a) Gram-scale experiment. (b) Late-stage modification of natural products. (c) The synthesis of vortioxetine using our protocol.To investigate the mechanism for this reductive thiolation, a series of control experiments have been carried out. First, the treatment of benzimidazolium sulfonamide 1a with PPh3 furnished the key N–S+ intermediate Int-I and Ph3P = O, which were confirmed by 1H NMR, HRMS data and 31P NMR (Scheme 5a, see the ESI). A mixture of Int-I and 2a was able to afford 3a in 80% yield under the standard conditions, indicating that the reaction did go through this route (Scheme 5b). Furthermore, the key nickel-complex 14 was prepared and reacted with Int-I to furnish thioether 3d in 15% yield (Scheme 5c). Finally, sulfone 15 was used in the absence of benzimidazolium sulfonamide 1a and 2a under standard conditions. No reduced product 3a was detected, which indicates that the PPh3 reduction occurs before the cross-coupling (Scheme 5d). On the basis of the experimental results and previous reports,16c,g a plausible mechanism for the reductive thiolation of organic halides is proposed (Scheme 5e). Initially, the reduction of the Ni(ii) salt by zinc affords the active Ni(0) catalyst A, which undergoes oxidative addition into the C–X bond of organic halides to give the intermediate R–Ni(ii)X B. The following reduction of B forms R–Ni(i) intermediate C.15b,16g Then C and Int-I undergo stepwise single-electron transfer with the possibility of radical trapping within a solvent cage to afford intermediate D before the generation of R–Ni(iii)-SAr E and benzoimidazole residue 16. Finally, the reductive elimination of E furnishes the desired thioether product and Ni(i) species F which is reduced by zinc to facilitate the next catalytic cycle.Open in a separate windowScheme 5Mechanistic studies and proposed mechanism.  相似文献   

19.
Brønsted acid catalyzed formal [4 + 4]-, [4 + 3]-, and [4 + 2]-cycloadditions of donor–acceptor cyclobutenes, cyclopropenes, and siloxyalkynes with benzopyrylium ions are reported. [4 + 2]-cyclization/deMayo-type ring-extension cascade processes produce highly functionalized benzocyclooctatrienes, benzocycloheptatrienes, and 2-naphthols in good to excellent yields and selectivities. Moreover, the optical purity of reactant donor–acceptor cyclobutenes is fully retained during the cascade. The 1,3-dicarbonyl product framework of the reaction products provides opportunities for salen-type ligand syntheses and the construction of fused pyrazoles and isoxazoles that reveal a novel rotamer-diastereoisomerism.

Brønsted acid catalysis realizes formal [4 + 4]-, [4 + 3]-, and [4 + 2]-cycloadditions of donor–acceptor cyclobutenes, cyclopropanes, and siloxyalkynes with benzopyrylium ions.

Medium-sized rings are the core skeletons of many natural products and bioactive molecules,1 and a growing number of strategies have been developed for their synthesis.2 Because of their enthalpic and entropic advantages, ring expansion is a highly efficient methodology for these constructions.3–6 For example, Sun and co-workers have developed acid promoted ring extensions of oxetenium and azetidinium species formed from siloxyalkynes with cyclic acetals and hemiaminals (Scheme 1a).4 Takasu and co-workers have reported an elegant ring expansion with a palladium(ii) catalyzed 4π-electrocyclic ring-opening/Heck arylation cascade with fused cyclobutenes (Scheme 1b).5 Each transformation is initiated by the formation of fused bicyclic units followed by ring expansion or rearrangement to give medium-sized rings.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Cycloaddition/ring expansion background and this work.Strategies for the formation of fused bicyclic compounds rely on cycloaddition of dienes or dipoles with unsaturated cyclic compounds7 and, if the reactant cyclic compound is strained and chiral, the resulting bicyclic compound is activated toward ring opening that results in retention of chirality. We have recently reported access to donor–acceptor cycloalkenes by [3 + n] cycloaddition that have the prerequisites of unsaturated cyclic compounds suitable for cycloaddition.8 Donor–acceptor (D–A) cyclopropenes9 and cyclobutenes10 have sufficient strain in the resulting bicyclic compounds to undergo ring opening. We envision that the selection of a diene or dipolar reactant and suitable reaction conditions could realize cycloaddition and subsequent ring expansion. Benzopyrylium species,11,12 which are generated by metal or acid catalysis, have attracted our attention. We anticipated that their high reactivity would overcome the conventional unfavorable kinetic and/or thermodynamic factors that typically impede medium-sized ring formation. From a mechanistic perspective, benzopyrylium species are often formed by transition metal catalyzed reactions with 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes.11 Recently, the reaction between 1H-isochromene acetal and Brønsted acid catalyst forms the 2-benzopyrylium salts that could react with functional alkenes to give same cycloaddition products.12 Consequently, we believed that the [4 + 2]-cyclization between benzopyrylium species and donor–acceptor cyclobutenes, cyclopropenes, or siloxyalkynes would give bridged oxetenium intermediates, which contain high strain energy that should provide the driving force for ring expansion. The “push and pull” electronic effect of donor–acceptor functional groups facilitates deMayo-type ring-opening of the cyclobutane or cyclopropane skeletons (Scheme 1c).13Here we report bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (HNTf2) catalyzed formal [4 + 4]-, [4 + 3]- and [4 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions of D–A cyclobutenes, cyclopropenes, and siloxyalkynes with benzopyrylium salts. Polysubstituted benzo-cyclooctatrienes, benzocycloheptatrienes and 2-naphthols, are produced in good to excellent yields and selectivities. Complete retention of configuration occurs using chiral cyclobutenes, and opportunities for further functionalization are built into these constructions.Initially, we conducted transition metal catalyzed reactions with 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde intending to produce the corresponding benzopyrylium ion and explore the possibility of cycloaddition/ring opening with donor–acceptor cyclobutene 2a. Use of Ph3PAuCl/AgSbF6, Pd(OAc)2 and Cu(OTf)2, which were efficient catalysts in previous transformations,11 gave only a trace amount of cycloaddition product (Fig. 1). Spectral analysis showed that mostly starting material remained (Fig. 1-i and ii). Increasing the reaction temperature led only to decomposition of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde (Fig. 1-iv) or donor–acceptor cyclobutene 2a (Fig. 1-iv).Open in a separate windowFig. 1Reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde with donor–acceptor cyclobutene 2a.From these disappointments we turned our attention to 1H-isochromene acetal 1a as the benzopyrylium ion precursor. Various Lewis acid catalysts were employed with limited success, but we were pleased to observe the formation of the desired formal [4 + 4]-cycloaddition benzocyclooctatriene product 3aa, albeit in low yields (Table 1, entries 1–6). Selection of the Brønsted super acid HNTf2 (ref. 14) proved to be the most promising, producing 3aa in 40% yield (Table 1, entry 7). Increasing the amount of D–A cyclobutene 2a by 30% gave a much higher yield of 3aa (Table 1, entry 8 vs. 7). Optimization of the stoichiometric reaction between 1a and 2a by increasing the reaction temperature from rt to 35 °C led to the formation of the desired product in 76% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 9 vs. 8). However, a further increase in the reaction temperature (Table 1, entry 10) or reducing the catalyst loading to 5 mol% did not improve the yield of 3aa (Table 1, entry 11).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryCat (10 mol%)Temp. (°C)Yieldb
1Sc(OTf)3rt23
2Yb(OTf)3rtTrace
3In(OTf)3rt16
4TiCl4rtTrace
5BF3·OEt2rt20
6TMSOTfrt17
7HNTf2rt40
8cHNTf2rt67
9cHNTf23578(76)d
10c,eHNTf26062
11c,fHNTf23550
Open in a separate windowaReactions were performed by adding the catalyst (10 mol%) to 1a (0.1 mmol) and 2a (0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at the corresponding temperature for 24 h.bYields were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis with CH2Br2 as the internal standard.c1.3 equiv. 2a was used.dIsolated yield.eReaction performed at 60 °C for 12 h.f5 mol% catalyst loading.With optimized conditions using 1a in hand, we examined the scope of the formal [4 + 4]-cycloaddition reactions of D–A cyclobutenes 2 with a diverse set of acetal compounds 1. As shown in Scheme 2, a wide range of acetal substrates (1a–1i) with different substituents at different positions all reacted smoothly with D–A cyclobutene 2a to form the corresponding benzocyclooctatriene products 3 in good to excellent yields. Structural variations in the acetals produced only modest changes in product yields which ranged from 55 to 87%. Similarly, both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating substituents at the 4-position of the cyclobutene phenyl ring produced the corresponding products (3db–3dd) in good yields, and 2-naphthyl (2e) and 2-thienyl (2f) substituted cyclobutenes were suitable substrates (85% and 51% product yields, respectively). trans-1,2,3,4-Tetrasubstituted (R2 = CH3) 2-sil-oxycyclobutenecarboxylate 2g also underwent [4 + 4]-cycloaddition with 1d in good yield and fully retained its diastereoselectivity. The structure of 3fa was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Scheme 2).15Open in a separate windowScheme 2Scope of the [4 + 4]-cycloaddition reaction of D–A cyclobutenes and 1H-isochromene acetals.a aReactions were performed by adding HNTf2 (10 mol%) to 1 (0.1 mmol) and 2 (0.13 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at 35 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields are reported.Chiral donor–acceptor cyclobutenes with high enantiomeric excess and diastereoselectivity are conveniently obtained by catalytic [3 + 1]-cycloaddition of enoldiazoacetates with acyl ylides of sulfur.10 To determine if optical purity is retained, chiral D–A cyclobutene 2a (80% ee) was reacted with 1d under the optimized conditions, and the corresponding benzocyclo-octatriene product 3da was obtained in good yield with complete retention of configuration (Scheme 3, eqn (1)). With trans-disubstituted 2g and 2h that have higher optical purity, however, 3dg and 3dh were obtained in moderate yields with full retention of diastereo- and enantioselectivities, but addition products 8dg and 8dh were formed competitively (Scheme 3, eqn (2)). These compounds resulted from initial addition then desilylation, indicating that the [4 + 2]-cyclization is a stepwise reaction. Attempts to suppress the competing pathway by changing solvents or using the isopropyl acetal substrate to form a bulky 2-propanol nucleophile (1j) failed (for details, see ESI). However, p-methoxy (R1) substituted 1g that would stabilize the incipient benzopyrylium ion gave higher selectivity (4 : 1 vs. 2 : 1), and the desired [4 + 4] cycloaddition product 3gg was isolated in 50% yield with 97% ee and >19 : 1 dr (Scheme 3, eqn (3)).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Stereochemical features of the [4 + 4]-cycloaddition of D–A cyclobutenes and 1H-isochromene acetals.a aReactions were performed by adding HNTf2 (10 mol%) to 1 (0.1 mmol) and 2 (0.13 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at 35 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields are reported.To further expand the generality of this strategy, we investigated its use with donor–acceptor cyclopropenes 4. The desired formal [4 + 3]-cycloaddition products 5 were obtained in good to excellent yields (Scheme 4). Optimized conditions used 20 mol% HNTf2 catalyst with 4 Å molecular sieves at room temperature for 2 h. The scope of this [4 + 3]-cycloaddition reaction with cyclopropenes 4 showed that acetals bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents on the aromatic ring were tolerated. However, as with [4 + 4]-cycloaddition reactions, the [4 + 3] reactions of 1 with R1 = alkyl or H did not produce any of the desired products. Furthermore, 3-substituted cyclopropenes 4b–4d participated in this reaction, and their products (5ab–5ad) were obtained in 63%–81% yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Scope of the [4 + 3]-cycloaddition reaction of D–A cyclopropenes and 1H-isochromene acetals.a aReactions were performed by adding HNTf2 (20 mol%) to 1 (0.2 mmol), 4 (0.24 mmol) and 4 Å (50 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at rt for 2 h. Isolated yields are reported.Siloxyalkynes 6, as electron-rich alkynes, have been widely used in diverse cyclization reaction.4,16 We expected that 6 could also participate in [4 + 2]-cyclization/ring-expansion cascade processes, giving substituted 2-naphthol products. Interestingly, substituent controlled diverse products were obtained in good to excellent reactivity and selectivity (Scheme 5). Aryl (R1) substituted acetals (1a–1d, 1f, 1h, 1i) reacted with siloxyalkynes 6a–6d, giving 2-naphthols (7aa–7ad and 7ba–7ia) in 35%–96% yields. With electron-donating group (EDG) substituents (7ba and 7ca) on the aromatic ring, higher reactivity was observed relative to those with electron-withdrawing groups (7da–7ia). In addition, the acetal with R1 = H (1m) reacted with siloxyalkynes 6 to form the 2-naphthol-1-carboxaldehyde derivative in good yield, and the structure of 7ma was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Scheme 5b).15 Intriguingly, the n-butyl (R1) substituted acetal 1n reacted with siloxyalkynes via a [4 + 2]-cyclization with loss of methyl pentanoate (BuCO2CH3), affording siloxy naphthalenes 7na–7nd that are important precursors to the widely used axially chiral 2,2′-binols.17 The substrate scope of siloxyalkynes 6 for their formal [4 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction with n-butyl substituted acetal 1n was also explored (Scheme 5c). In all cases methyl pentanoate was eliminated to form 2,3-disubstituted naphthalene products (7na–7nd). Alkyl substituted siloxyalkynes (6a–6c) showed higher reactivity compared with phenyl substituted siloxyalkynes 6d. It should be mentioned that, recently, a similar transformation using BF3·OEt2 as catalyst or in excess (2 equiv.) with 2,4,6-collidine (1 equiv.) was reported,18 and HNTf2 was stated to be much less effective. To clarify this discrepancy, we carefully repeated these transformations (7ma and 7na) and found that all starting materials are completely consumed in less than 10 min to deliver [4 + 2]-cycloaddition products in good yields. Prolonging the reaction time to 12 hours, which was the reaction time used by the authors, results in their decomposition to a complex mixture of materials.Open in a separate windowScheme 5Scope of the [4 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction of siloxyalkynes and 1H-isochromene acetals.a aReactions were performed by adding HNTf2 (10–30 mol%) to 1 (0.2 mmol) and 6 (0.3–0.4 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) at rt for 10 min. Isolated yields are reported. b40 mol% HNTf2 catalyst was used.To illustrate the utility of this process, a large scale catalytic [4 + 4] cycloaddition was performed, and adduct 3da was obtained in 87% yield. Further transformations were conducted for the synthesis of pyrazole and isoxazole structures based on its 1,3-dicarbonyl skeleton (Fig. 2a). Compound 3da reacted with hydrazine and hydroxylamine in refluxed ethanol, affording pyrazole 14da and isoxazole 15da in 89% yield or 66% yield, respectively. The structure of 15da was confirmed by X-ray diffraction.15 Interestingly, two NMR distinguishable interconvertible diastereoisomers were detected for each of these eight-membered cyclic products (2.5 : 1 and 5 : 1 dr for 14da and 15da, respectively, in CDCl3). These diastereoisomers are rotamers (for details, see ESI) that exist at equilibrium with each other in solution but form one crystalline product (X-ray structure of 15da). In addition, the cycloaddition product 7ma reacted with chiral 1,2-cyclohexanediamine and 1,2-diphenylethylenediamine to give salen-type ligands L1 and L2 in 53% yield and 74% yield, respectively, which provides new opportunities for ligand screening (Fig. 2b).19Open in a separate windowFig. 2Large scale reaction, further transformations, and ligands synthesis.In the mechanistic possibility considered for these HNTf2 catalyzed cycloaddition reactions (Fig. 3), protonation of acetal 1 with HNTf2 gives the corresponding highly reactive benzopyrylium intermediate int-I, which reacts with donor–acceptor cyclobutenes 2, cyclopropenes 4, or siloxyalkynes 6 affording addition intermediates int-II that undergo ring closure to int-III. Ring expansion then occurs to deliver 3, 5 and 7 in good to excellent yields with fully retained stereoselectivities. Furthermore, the formed TIPSNTf2 ([4 + 4]- and [4 + 3]-cycloaddition) or HNTf2 {[4 + 2] cycloaddition} are active acid catalysts for the conversion of 1 to benzopyrylium intermediate int-I that continues the catalytic cycle. With sterically larger D–A cyclobutenes or when a less ring-strained benzocyclopentene 12 is employed (for details, see ESI), the competing direct desilylation of int-II occurs, delivering addition byproducts 8 or 13. Compounds 7na–7nd arise from the analog to int-III from which ketene formation or methanol displacement effects 1,4-elimination.Open in a separate windowFig. 3Proposed mechanism.  相似文献   

20.
Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir. We herein report nickel-catalyzed direct coupling of alkynes and methanol, providing direct access to valuable allylic alcohols in good yields and excellent chemo- and regioselectivity. The approach features a broad substrate scope and high atom-, step- and redox-economy. Moreover, this method was successfully extended to the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals through a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol.

Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir.

To address the sustainability issues in the production of new chemicals, the development of new catalytic processes that are free of by-products and using abundant renewable feedstocks is one of the most important challenges facing chemists today. The simplest alcohol, methanol, is very abundant, with a total annual production capacity of approximately 110 million metric tons per year,1 and is an important C1-feedstock in the chemical industry. Beller2 and Milstein3 made fundamental developments in catalytic dehydrogenation reactions of methanol.4 Krische and coworkers pioneered the study of Ir-catalyzed direct C–C coupling of methanol with reactive π-unsaturated reactants (1,3-dienes, 1,3-enynes and allenes).5 The groups of Glorius,6 Donohoe,7 Obora,8 Andersson9 and others10 demonstrated the direct methylation of ketones or amines using methanol. Despite these achievements, the catalytic C–C bond coupling reactions with methanol are still extremely rare and are limited to the use of precious and noble metal-catalysts such as Ru, Rh or Ir.11 The development and use of cheap and abundant metal catalysts for methanol activation is uphill and remains an important field that urgently needs to be developed.On the other hand, allylic alcohols are highly versatile building blocks in organic synthesis and the pharmaceutical industry, and much effort has been devoted to their synthesis. Among them, nickel-catalyzed reductive coupling of alkynes and aldehydes represents an effective and powerful method. However, this method generally requires the use of stoichiometric reducing reagents that are air-sensitive, metallic or pyrophoric (e.g. ZnR2, BEt3, and R3SiH, Scheme 1a).12 The direct cross-coupling of alcohols and alkynes to synthesize allylic alcohols without the use of any reductant or oxidant represents a significant advancement (Scheme 1b).13 However, this approach still poses many limitations that will require considerable effort to overcome. (1) Alkynes are limited to dialkyl alkynes, and poor regioselectivities were observed for unsymmetrical alkynes, which greatly limits the scope of application of the reaction. (2) Alcohols are restricted to active benzyl alcohols and higher alcohols. The direct cross-coupling of alkynes with methanol has not yet been reported.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of allylic alcohols by Ni-catalyzed coupling reaction with alkynes.Although the alkyne–paraformaldehyde reductive coupling has been developed,14 the paraformaldehyde was itself prepared from synthesis gas (through methanol). Therefore, the development of a new strategy for the direct coupling of alkynes and methanol without the use of any reductant or oxidant is still of great value, but also extremely challenging: (1) alkynes are reactive and could rapidly dimerize to 1,3-dienes15 or cyclotrimerize to aromatic ring derivatives in the interaction with nickel.16 (2) Unsymmetric alkynes could result in a mixture of regioisomers that are difficult to separate. (3) The activation energy of methanol in the dehydrogenation process (ΔH = +84 kJ mol−1) is significantly higher than that of higher alcohols or even ethanol (ΔH = +68 kJ mol−1).17Herein we report the nickel-catalyzed direct and regioselective hydrohydroxymethylation of alkynes for the first time using methanol as a C1-feedstock, providing a broad and efficient approach for the synthesis of high added-value allylic alcohols in a high atom-, step- and redox-economic manner. In addition, a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol has also been developed for the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals in good yields and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity (Scheme 1c).In our initial experiments, we chose unsymmetrical internal alkyne 1a as a model substrate to optimize the reaction conditions (13a Even if the reaction temperature was increased to 100 °C, only a trace amount of allylic alcohol product 2a was observed (entry 2), which indicates that the use of methanol in the catalytic C–C coupling reactions is indeed a big challenge. Various N-heterocyclic carbene ligands (L2–L6) were investigated (entries 3–9). We found that the selectivity of allylic alcohol 2a is challenged by a number of side reactions, such as the hydrogenation (3a), dimerization (4a) and trimerization (5a) of alkyne 1a. L4 is the most effective, providing 2a with the highest yield (40%) and excellent regioselectivity (14/1), but an appreciable quantity of dimerization and trimerization by-products 4a and 5a was still obtained (entry 5). Krische14 reported that PCy3 could promote the reductive coupling of alkynes and paraformaldehyde, but we found that it is not effective for alkyne–methanol coupling (entry 8).Optimization of reaction conditionsa
EntryLigandAdditiveYieldb (2, %)Yieldb (3, %)Yieldb (4, %)Yieldb (5, %)
1c,d L1 No reaction
2c L1 66<220
3 L2 30 (14/1)e151320
4 L3 35<243
5 L4 40 (14/1)e92223
6 L5 30 (7/1)e61827
7 L6 No reaction
8Cy3PComplicated
9PPh3104<259
10 L4 A1 10<2<2<2
11 L4 A2 38 (14/1)e<2<2<2
12 L4 A3 60f (14/1)e6<2<2
13 L4 A4 No reaction
14 L4 A3 g54f (14/1)e867
Open in a separate windowaReactions conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), Ni(COD)2 (10 mol%), ligand (20 mol%), tBuOK (12 mol%), additive (1 equiv.) in toluene (1 mL) and MeOH (3 mL) in a sealed tube at 100 °C.bDetermined by GC analysis using adamantane as the internal standard.cWithout tBuOK.dRoom temperature.eRegioselectivity (2a/2a′).fIsolated yield.g0.2 equivalent.Many examples have reported that olefins can affect the outcomes of transition metal-catalyzed cross coupling reactions through increased activity, stability, or selectivity.18 More recently, Montgomery et al.19 found that adding electron-deficient olefins to NHC–Ni(0) complexes can improve their catalytic performance. Inspired by this discovery, we examined various acrylates A1–A4 (entries 10–13). Excitingly, the addition of methyl methacrylate (A3) can indeed significantly improve the chemoselectivity of the reaction, providing the allylic alcohol 2a in 60% isolated yield and a more than 14/1 ratio of regioisomers (entry 12). The structure of acrylates has a great influence on the reaction outcome, indicating that they may act as additional ligands to coordinate with the nickel catalyst, thereby suppressing these undesired dimerization or cyclotrimerization side reactions. However, by-products formed by the reductive coupling of acrylates and alkynes have also been observed (see Section 3 in the ESI).20 It is worth mentioning that stoichiometric acrylate additives are not necessary. As shown in entry 14, even if 0.2 equivalent of A3 was used, 54% of the target product 2a can be obtained, thus showing the subtleties of our catalytic system.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we turned our attention to explore the substrate scope of alkynes (Scheme 2). We were pleased to find that various unsymmetrical aryl–alkyl alkynes were coupled with methanol to provide the corresponding allylic alcohols 2a–2q in moderate to good yields and high regioselectivities. Various functional groups, such as fluorine (2b), trifluoromethyl (2c), chlorine (2e), allyl (2f), bromine (2g), amine (2h–2j) and amide (2k and 2l) could all be well-tolerated. Heteroaromatic ring-substituted alkynes, such as 5-indole,21 2-dibenzothiophene and 2-dibenzofuran could also proceed smoothly to furnish allylic alcohols 2n–2p in 40–63% yield. It is worth mentioning that complex biologically active molecules such as estrone derivatives, could also be successfully incorporated into the desired product 2q in 62%, thus demonstrating the robustness and generality of this methodology for late-stage modification of complex biologically active molecules. Terminal alkynes were also found to be compatible with the reaction conditions, providing the corresponding products 2r–2s in moderate yields and excellent regioselectivity (>20/1). Symmetric diarylalkynes bearing electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups were applicable to the reaction (2t–2y). Strikingly, both 1,2-di(furan-2-yl)ethyne and 1,2-di(thiophen-2-yl)ethyne were competent substrates and furnished the desired allylic alcohols 2x–2y in good yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Substrate scope of alkynes for the synthesis of allylic alcohols. Reactions were carried out with 1 (0.2 mmol), Ni(COD)2 (10 mol%), L4 (10 mol%), tBuOK (12 mol%), and methyl methacrylate (0.2 mmol) in toluene (1.0 mL) and MeOH (3.0 mL) in a sealed tube at 100 °C. Isolated yields are given. a The reaction was conducted with Ni(COD)2 (15 mol%), L4 (15 mol%), and tBuOK (18 mol%). b ((4-Bromophenyl)ethynyl)trimethylsilane was used. c The reaction was conducted with toluene (0.5 mL) and MeOH (1.5 mL).In addition, this transformation is not restricted to aryl-substituted alkynes. As shown in Scheme 2, oct-4-yne and cyclododecane were coupled with methanol to produce allylic alcohols 2z and 2aa in 87% and 54% yields, respectively. To further evaluate the influence of the electronic properties of the substituents on the regioselectivity, we tested the hydrohydroxymethylation reaction of unsymmetrical dialkyl-substituted alkynes bearing benzyloxy or dibenzylamino groups at the propargylic position. To our delight, the corresponding allylic alcohols 2ab–2ad were obtained in moderate yields, with remarkably high regioselectivity (>20/1). However, the regioselectivity of this reaction was decreased by the alkyne bearing a benzyloxy group at the homopropargylic position.To expand the potential synthetic applications of the transformation, we investigated the hydrohydroxymethylation of 1,3-enynes. The corresponding dienol 2af was obtained, which was selectively hydrohydroxymethylated on the alkyne but not on the alkene moiety. 1,6-Enyne was also compatible to give the corresponding allylic alcohol 2ag in 42% yield with >20/1 regioselectivity. This strategy can serve as a powerful supplement to the previous method reported by Krische et al.,22 in which alcohols were reacted with alkenes to obtain the corresponding homopropargylic alcohols.23Alkynone substrates were also tested, but the expected product was not detected due to their sensitivity to base. After slightly modifying the reaction conditions, we were pleased to find that various [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals 7 could be obtained in good yields with excellent regio- and diastereoselectivities through the cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones 6 with methanol (Scheme 3). We first explored the influence of the substituents (R1) at the terminus of the triple bond. A variety of para-substituted aromatic rings at the alkyne terminus could undergo tandem cyclization to provide the target hemiacetals 7b–7g in 54–78% yields. The structure of 7a was confirmed by an X-ray crystal diffraction study. The aryl groups with substituents at the meta and ortho position were also found to be compatible, leading to the corresponding products 7h–7j in 56–74% yields. Moreover, various (hetero)aryl rings such as naphthalene (7k), benzodioxan (7l), 3,4-dihydrobenzodioxine (7m), thiophene (7n), dibenzofuran (7o), dibenzothiophene (7p), indole (7q) and pyridine (7r) at the terminal of the triple bond could be successfully incorporated into the desired products in good yields. Strikingly, estrone was also compatible with this transformation to afford the desired product 7s in 65% yield. However, no desired product was observed when the methyl substituted alkynone substrate was used. We then investigated the influence of the substituents (R2) at the 2-position of the cyclopentane-1,3-diones. Ethyl, benzyl, and allyl were all well tolerated leading to the corresponding [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals 7t–7w in moderate yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Substrate scope of alkynones for the synthesis of [5, 6]-bicyclic hemiacetals. Reactions were carried out with 6 (0.2 mmol), Ni(COD)2 (15 mol%), IMes (15 mol%), LiF (10 mol%), and methyl methacrylate (0.2 mmol) in toluene (1.5 mL) and MeOH (0.5 mL) in a sealed tube at 40 °C. Isolated yields are given.To provide a deeper insight into the reaction mechanism, deuterium-labelling experiments were performed. 1a was reacted with CH3OD under our standard reaction conditions; however, no incorporation of deuterium was detected in product 2a (Scheme 4a), revealing that the hydroxyl of methanol is not the proton source. This result is different from the previous report by Zhou et al.,24 in which the Ni(0) catalyst underwent oxidative addition to the O–H bond of methanol to form methoxyl nickel hydride species and then migratory insertion into unsaturated bonds. Further investigation using CD3OD as solvent provided 2a-D in 41% yield, in which 99% of the deuterium was incorporated into the olefinic position, but the reaction rate is obviously slowed down (Scheme 4b). We also conducted the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiment. The intermolecular competition reaction between 1a and CD3OD or CH3OH under standard reaction conditions provided a KIE (kH/kD) value of 6.1 (Scheme 4c). Taken together, these results may indicate that the dehydrogenation of methanol to form the key formaldehyde intermediate is the rate-determining step of this transformation.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Deuterium-labelling experiments.On the basis of these experimental results and previous observations, a possible reaction mechanism is proposed in Scheme 5. The reaction is initiated by reducing alkyne to alkene and simultaneously oxidizing methanol to formaldehyde, as evidenced by the detection of catalytic amounts of alkene 3. Oxidative cyclization of acrylate-coordinated NHC–Ni(0) A 17 with alkyne and formaldehyde gives oxa-nickelacycle intermediate B. Subsequent protonation of nickelacycle species B with methanol affords the vinylnickel intermediate C, which can undergo β-H elimination to generate vinyl nickel hydride species D and formaldehyde.25 Reductive elimination of D will furnish allylic alcohol 2 and the catalytically active Ni(0) catalyst A. Further nucleophilic addition of the hydroxyl group to one of the ketone carbonyl groups will produce [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetal 7. We speculate that the acrylate is used as an additional ligand, thereby inhibiting the alkyne dimerization to 1,3-dienes or cyclotrimerization to aromatic ring derivatives.Open in a separate windowScheme 5Proposed reaction mechanism.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号