A comparative analysis of mono‐ and disaccharide benzyl fucopyranosides

The syntheses and X‐ray analyses of two fuco­pyran­osides, the monosaccharide benzyl 3,4‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2‐hydro­xy‐β‐d ‐fuco­pyran­oside, C₁₇H₂₂O₇, and the disaccharide 1‐benzyl O‐(2,3‐di‐O‐acetyl‐4,6‐O‐benzyl­idene‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)‐(12)‐3,4‐O‐iso­propyl­idene‐β‐d ‐fuco­pyran­oside, C₃₃H₄₀O₁₂, are de­scribed. The different substituents induce small conformational changes on the fuco­pyran­oside ring. However, the conformation of the benzyl group varies from (+)gauche for the monosaccharide to synperiplanar for the disaccharide.     

Amarisolide monohydrate,a 2‐(β‐glu­cosyl)­neoclerodane

The absolute configuration of the neoclerodane glycoside amarisolide, presented here as the monohydrate, C₂₆H₃₆O₉·H₂O, has been determined by association with the known configuration of the glucose moiety. Its structure was established as 2β‐(O‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­neocleroda‐3,13(16),14‐trien‐15,16‐epoxy‐18,19‐olide. Extensive hydrogen bonding among the hydroxyl groups of the sugar moiety forms layers which are interconnected by water mol­ecules.     

O‐Ethyl and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl)thiocarbamate

In both the title structures, O‐ethyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thio­carbam­ate, C₁₇H₂₅NO₁₀S, and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thiocar­bam­ate, C₁₆H₂₃NO₁₀S, the hexo­pyran­osyl ring adopts the ⁴C₁ conformation. All the ring substituents are in equatorial positions. The acetoxy­methyl group is in a gauche–gauche conformation. The S atom is in a synperi­planar conformation, while the C—N—C—O linkage is antiperiplanar. N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains and these are connected by C—H?O interactions.     

(1S,2R,2′S)‐ and (1S,2S,2′S)‐1‐phenyl‐2‐phenyl­thio‐2‐(tetra­hydro­pyran‐2′‐yl­thio)­ethanol diastereoisomers at 193 K

In the synthesis of 1‐phenyl‐2‐phenyl­thio‐2‐(tetra­hydro­pyran‐2‐yl­thio)­ethanol, C₁₉H₂₂O₂S₂, four diastereoisomers are formed. Two non‐centrosymmetric enantiomeric forms which crystallize in space groups P2₁2₁2₁ and Pna2₁ are presented. The former has an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the O atom of the tetra­hydro­pyran ring. In the latter isomer, the hydroxyl group forms an intermolecular hydrogen bond to the O atom of the tetra­hydro­pyran­yl group of a neighbouring mol­ecule, joining the mol­ecules into chains in the c‐axis direction; the O?O distances are 2.962 (4) and 2.764 (3) Å, respectively. The tetra­hydro­pyran rings are in chair conformations in both isomers and the S side chain has an equatorial orientation in the former, but an axial orientation in the latter mol­ecule.     

Methyl 3,6‐di‐O‐pivaloyl‐α‐d‐manno­pyran­oside

The X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the title compound, C₁₇H₃₀O₈, revealed a ⁴C₁ conformation of the pyran­osyl ring [Cremer–Pople puckering parameters of Q = 0.568 (2) Å, θ = 5.1 (2) and ϕ = 218 (3)°]. The structure shows no deviations from the geometric parameters of pyran­oside carbohydrates. The hydroxyl groups participate in O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, forming a two‐dimensional pattern [O⃛O = 2.811 (3) and 2.995 (3) Å].     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐l‐fucopyranosyl α‐­d‐­glucopyranoside hemihydrate

The crystal structure of methyl 4‐O‐β‐l ‐fuco­pyran­osyl α‐d ‐gluco­pyran­oside hemihydrate C₁₃H₂₄O₁₀·0.5H₂O is organized in sheets with antiparallel strands, where hydro­phobic interaction accounts for partial stabilization. Infinite hydrogen‐bonding networks are observed within each layer as well as between layers; some of these hydrogen bonds are mediated by water mol­ecules. The conformation of the disaccharide is described by the glycosidic torsion angles: ?_H = ?6.1° and ψ_H = 34.3°. The global energy minimum conformation as calculated by molecular mechanics in vacuo has ?_H = ?58° and ψ_H = ?20°. Thus, quite substantial changes are observed between the in vacuo structure and the crystal structure with its infinite hydrogen‐bonding networks.     

4,1′,6′‐Trichloro‐4,1′,6′‐trideoxysucrose monohydrate

At 160 K, the gluco­pyran­osyl ring in 1,6‐di­chloro‐1,6‐di­deoxy‐β‐d ‐fructo­furan­osyl 4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐gluco­pyran­oside monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₉Cl₃O₈·H₂O, has a near ideal ⁴C₁ chair conformation, while the fructo­furan­osyl ring has a ⁴T₃ conformation. The conformation of the sugar mol­ecule is quite different to that of sucralose, particularly in the conformation about the glycosidic linkage, which affects the observed pattern of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. A complex series of intermolecular hydrogen bonds links the sugar and water mol­ecules into an infinite three‐dimensional framework.     

Pomiferin

The crystal structure of pomiferin, 3‐(3,4‐di­hydroxy­phenyl)‐5‐hydroxy‐8,8‐di­methyl‐6‐(3‐methyl­but‐2‐enyl)‐4H,8H‐pyrano[2,3‐h]­chromen‐4‐one, C₂₅H₂₄O₆, has been determined. The benzo­pyran­one ring system is nearly planar and the dihedral angle between the phenyl ring and the benzo­pyran­one moiety is 40.85 (4)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by a one‐dimensional chain of inter‐ and intramolecular O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, with O⃛O distances in the range 2.5546 (15)–2.7999 (16) Å.     

Methyl 2,3‐dideoxy‐2‐S‐methylmercurio‐2‐thio‐β‐d‐manno‐oct‐2‐ulo­pyranosonate‐(2,6)

The hexo­pyran­osyl ring of the title compound, [Hg(CH₃)(C₉H₁₅O₇S)], adopts the ⁴C₁ chair conformation, and the anomeric configuration of the thio­methyl­mercury linkage is β. The compound exists as two symmetry‐independent conformers, A and B, within the unit cell, and each shows an almost linear S—Hg—C arrangement. Most of the bond distances and angles in A and B are similar, although a marked difference exists in the side‐chain conformation. Weak secondary intramolecular (between Hg and ring O) and intermolecular (between A and B conformers) interactions are documented.     

2,3,3′,6‐Tetra‐O‐acetyl‐4,1′,6′‐trichloro‐4,1′,4′,6′‐tetradeoxygalactosucrose

At 160 K, one of the Cl atoms in the furanoid moiety of 3‐O‐acetyl‐1,6‐di­chloro‐1,4,6‐tri­deoxy‐β‐d ‐fructo­furan­osyl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐galacto­pyran­oside, C₂₀H₂₇­Cl₃O₁₁, is disordered over two orientations, which differ by a rotation of about 107° about the parent C—C bond. The conformation of the core of the mol­ecule is very similar to that of 3‐O‐acetyl‐1,4,6‐tri­chloro‐1,4,6‐tri­deoxy‐β‐d ‐tagato­furanos­yl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐galacto­pyran­oside, particularly with regard to the conformation about the glycosidic linkage.     

3‐O‐Acetyl‐4‐deoxy‐4‐iodo‐β‐d‐fructo­furan­osyl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside

At 160 K, the gluco­pyran­osyl ring of the title compound, C₂₀H₂₈ClIO₁₃, has a near‐ideal ⁴C₁ conformation and the fructo­furan­osyl ring has a twist ⁴T₃ conformation. The two hydroxy groups are involved in intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, with the latter interactions linking the mol­ecules into infinite one‐dimensional chains. The absolute configuration of the mol­ecule has been determined.     

Chalcone epoxide inter­mediates in the syntheses of lignin‐related phenyl­coumarans

Compounds (2R*,3S*)‐1‐(3,4‐dimethoxy­phen­yl)‐3‐{3‐meth­oxy‐2‐[(2R*)‐tetra­hydro­pyran‐2‐yl­oxy]phen­yl}‐2,3‐ep­oxy‐1‐propanone, C₂₃H₂₆O₇, (I), and trans‐1‐(3,4‐dimethoxy­phen­yl)‐3‐[3‐meth­oxy‐2‐(methoxy­methoxy)­phen­yl]‐2,3‐ep­oxy‐1‐propanone, C₂₀H₂₂O₇, (II), were obtained on epoxidation of chalcones. The stereochemistries of (I) and (II) were elucidated. In both compounds, the substituents on the oxirane ring are trans‐oriented. Compound (I) was obtained together with a diastereometric form that differs from (I) with respect to the configuration of the asymmetric C atom in the tetra­hydro­pyran group. The geometries of the substituted oxirane rings of (I) and (II) are very similar. The hydrogen‐bonding patterns, mediated via weak C—H⋯O inter­actions, differ considerably. The crystal structures of (I) and (II) are compared with those of related chalcone epoxides. The conversion of (I) and (II) into lignin‐related phenyl­coumarans is discussed.     

(±)‐(4‐Oxo‐4H‐chromen‐2‐yl)(phenyl)methyl acetate

The title compound, C₁₈H₁₄O₄, forms a supramolecular structure viaπ–π stacking and weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions. The benzo­pyran moiety is almost planar. The benzene ring of the phenyl­methyl acetate substituent is nearly perpendicular to the fused benzene and pyran rings and also to the methyl acetate group.     

Hydro­gen bonding and π–π stacking in di­methyl­genistein

The title compound, 5‐hydroxy‐4′,7‐di­methoxy­isoflavone, C₁₇H₁₄O₅, is composed of a benzo­pyran­one moiety, a phenyl moiety and two methoxy groups. The benzo­pyran­one ring is not coplanar with the phenyl ring, the dihedral angle between them being 56.28 (3)°. The two methoxy groups are nearly coplanar with their corresponding rings, having C—C—O—C torsion angles of 2.9 (2) and 5.9 (2)°. The mol­ecules are linked by C—H·O hydrogen bonds into sheets containing classical centrosymmetric (8) rings. The sheets are further linked by aromatic π–π stacking interactions and C—H·O hydrogen bonds into a supramolecular structure.     

6‐Hydroxy‐2,2‐di­methyl‐3,4‐di­hydro‐2H‐benzo[b]pyran

The title compound, 2,2‐di­methyl­chroman‐6‐ol, C₁₁H₁₄O₂, has been identified as a side product from the condensation of hydro­quinone with 2‐methyl­but‐3‐en‐2‐ol. The pyran ring has a half‐chair conformation. The hydroxyl groups are involved in intermolecular hydrogen bonding which generates infinite spiral chains around the fourfold screw axes; the O?O hydrogen‐bonded distances are 2.661 (1) Å.     

Three 1,6-anhydro-β-d-glycopyranose derivatives

Two of the title compounds, 1,6-an­hydro-2,3-O-(S)-benzyl­idene-β-d -manno­pyran­ose, C₁₃H₁₄O₅, (I), and 1,6-an­hydro-4-O-benzyl-β-d -manno­pyran­ose, C₁₃H₁₆O₅, (II), are derived from β-d -manno­pyran­ose, while the third, 1,6-an­hydro-3,4-O-(S)-benzyl­idene-β-d -galacto­pyran­ose, C₁₃H₁₄O₅, (III), is derived from β-d -galacto­pyran­ose. In the crystal packing, each hydroxyl group is involved in O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, where the acceptor group is the other hydroxyl group in (II), or the endocyclic O atoms of the dioxolane [in (I)], an­hydro [in (II)] or pyran­ose [in (III)] rings. Differences in the crystal packing arise from the contrasting O—H⃛O hydrogen-bonding environments.     

Solid‐state transformation of 4,2′‐an­hydro‐5‐(β‐d‐arabino­furan­osyl)­uracil dihydrate to 4,2′‐an­hydro‐5‐(β‐d‐arabino­furan­osyl)­uracil mono­hydrate

Crystals of 4,2′‐an­hydro‐5‐(β‐d ‐arabino­furan­osyl)­uracil, (I), obtained from an aqueous solution, were characterized as the dihydrate, C₉H₁₀N₂O₅·2H₂O, (Ia). In air, these crystals slowly transform to the mono­hydrate, C₉H₁₀N₂O₅·H₂O, (Ib), but remain crystalline. The solid‐state transformation proceeds with the loss of one water mol­ecule and a rearrangement of hydrogen‐bonded layers of mol­ecules. The furan­ose ring in (I) has an approximate C4′‐exo,O4′‐endo twist conformation. The central five‐membered ring is slightly puckered. The uracil group is planar within experimental uncertainty.     

The fungal metabolite austdiol

The title compound, (7R,8S)‐7,8‐di­hydroxy‐3,7‐di­methyl‐6‐oxo‐7,8‐di­hydro‐6H‐isochromene‐5‐carb­aldehyde, C₁₂H₁₂O₅, is a trans‐vicinal diol. Of the two fused rings, which lie approximately in the same plane, the pyran ring is almost perfectly planar, while the cyclo­hexenone ring adopts a slightly distorted half‐chair conformation. The crystal packing is dictated by two strong intermolecular O—H⃛O interactions, one involving hydroxy and keto groups, the other involving two hydroxy groups. Molecules are linked together through twofold axes, forming zigzag ribbons extended along the a axis.     

The solid dihydrate of N,N‐di­methyl‐n‐tetra­decyl­amine oxide

Crystalline N,N‐di­methyl‐n‐tetra­decyl­amine oxide has been prepared by reaction of liquid N,N‐di­methyl‐n‐tetra­decyl­amine with 70% H₂O₂ in the presence of CO₂ as catalyst. The resulting soft low‐melting solid was crystallized as the dihydrate, viz. C₁₆H₃₅NO·2H₂O. The extended hydro­carbon chains pack in a parallel fashion, with the N‐oxide ends of the mol­ecules forming hydrogen bonds with the water mol­ecules in hydro­philic layers. The N—O distance is 1.411 (3) Å.     

10‐(4‐Fluorophenyl)‐3,3,6,6,9‐pentamethyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexahydroacridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione and 10‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐9‐­propyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexahydroacridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione

10‐(4‐Fluoro­phenyl)‐3,3,6,6,9‐penta­methyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexa­hydro­acridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione, C₂₄H₂₈FNO₂, (I), crystallizes with two crystallographically independent mol­ecules (which differ slightly in conformation), while 10‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)‐9‐propyl‐3,3,6,6‐tetra­methyl‐3,4,6,7,9,10‐hexa­hydro­acridine‐1,8(2H,5H)‐dione, C₂₆H₃₂FNO₂, (II), crystallizes with one mol­ecule per asymmetric unit. In both structures, the central ring in the acridine moiety is in a sofa conformation, while the outer rings adopt intermediate half‐chair/sofa conformations. The central pyridine ring is orthogonal to the substituted phenyl ring. In both structures, the packing of the crystal is stabilized by C—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds.