The achiral tetrapeptide Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Gly‐OtBu

The title achiral peptide N‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyrylglycine tert‐butyl ester or Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Gly‐OtBu (Aib is α‐aminoisobutyric acid, Z is benzyloxycarbonyl, Gly is glycine and OtBu indicates the tert‐butyl ester), C₂₆H₄₀N₄O₇, is partly hydrated (0.075H₂O) and has two different conformations which together constitute the asymmetric unit. Both molecules form incipient 3₁₀‐helices. They differ in the relative orientation of the N‐terminal protection group and at the C‐terminus. There are two 4→1 intramolecular hydrogen bonds.     

The peptide Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐L‐Ala‐OtBu

The title peptide, N‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐L‐alanine tert‐butyl ester or Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐L‐Ala‐OtBu (Aib is α‐aminoisobutyric acid, Z is benzyloxycarbonyl and OtBu indicates the tert‐butyl ester), C₂₇H₄₂N₄O₇, is a left‐handed helix with a right‐handed conformation in the fourth residue, which is the only chiral residue. There are two 4→1 intramolecular hydrogen bonds in the structure. In the lattice, molecules are hydrogen bonded to form columns along the c axis.     

N‐(tert‐Butoxycarbonyl)‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyric acid methyl ester: two polymorphic forms in the space group P21/n

The title compound (systematic name: methyl 2‐{2‐[(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)amino]‐2‐methylpropanamido}‐2‐methylpropanoate), C₁₄H₂₆N₂O₅, (I), crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n in two polymorphic forms, each with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. The molecular conformation is essentially the same in both polymorphs, with the α‐aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) residues adopting ϕ and ψ values characteristic of α‐helical and mixed 3₁₀‐ and α‐helical conformations. The helical handedness of the C‐terminal residue (Aib2) is opposite to that of the N‐terminal residue (Aib1). In contrast to (I), the closely related peptide Boc‐Aib‐Aib‐OBn (Boc is tert‐butoxycarbonyl and Bn is benzyl) adopts an α_L‐P_II backbone conformation (or the mirror image conformation). Compound (I) forms hydrogen‐bonded parallel β‐sheet‐like tapes, with the carbonyl groups of Aib1 and Aib2 acting as hydrogen‐bond acceptors. This seems to represent an unusual packing for a protected dipeptide containing at least one α,α‐disubstituted residue.     

Synthesis of Poly‐Aib Oligopeptides and Aib‐Containing Peptides via the ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Method’, and Their Crystal Structures

The protected poly‐Aib oligopeptides Z‐(Aib)_n‐N(Me)Ph with n=2–6 were prepared according to the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’, i.e., by coupling amino or peptide acids with 2,2,N‐trimethyl‐N‐phenyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐amine ( 1a ) as an Aib synthon (Scheme 2). Following the same concept, the segments Z‐(Aib)₃‐OH ( 9 ) and H‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 20 ) were synthesized, and their subsequent coupling with N,N′‐dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)/ZnCl₂ led to the protected heptapeptide Z‐(Aib)₃‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 21 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of the poly‐Aib oligopeptide amides were established by X‐ray crystallography confirming the 3₁₀‐helical conformation of Aib peptides.     

The tetrapeptide Z‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Val‐OBg monohydrate

The intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding pattern of Z‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Val‐OBg monohydrate [(N‐benzhydryl­amino)­carbonyl­methyl N‐benzyl­oxy­carbonyl‐α‐amino­isobutyryl­prolyl­valinate monohydrate], C₄₃H₅₅N₅O₈·H₂O, is unusual for a tetrapeptide because, in addition to a 14 hydrogen bond, a second hydrogen bond of the type 15 is formed. This folding reflects the intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding pattern that this amino acid sequence adopts in the naturally occurring peptaibol alamethicin.     

Conformational Analysis of the Cyclic Pentadepsipeptide Cyclo(Tro‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib) in the Solid State and in Solution

The cyclic 16‐membered pentadepsipeptide cyclo(Tro‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib) ( 1 ) was crystallized from MeOH/AcOEt/CH₂Cl₂, and its structure was established by X‐ray crystallography (Fig. 1). There are two symmetry‐independent molecules with different conformations in the asymmetric unit. Two intramolecular H‐bonds stabilize two β‐turns in each molecule. On the other hand, two of the four Aib residues are forced to assume a nonfavorable nonhelical conformation in each of the symmetry‐independent molecules (Table 1). The conformational study in CDCl₃ solution by NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicate that the averaged structure (Fig. 3) is almost the same as in the solid state.     

β‐Sheet to Helical‐Sheet Evolution Induced by Topochemical Polymerization: Cross‐α‐Amyloid‐like Packing in a Pseudoprotein with Gly‐Phe‐Gly Repeats

Protein‐mimics are of great interest for their structure, stability, and properties. We are interested in the synthesis of protein‐mimics containing triazole linkages as peptide‐bond surrogate by topochemical azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (TAAC) polymerization of azide‐ and alkyne‐modified peptides. The rationally designed dipeptide N₃‐CH₂CO‐Phe‐NHCH₂CCH ( 1 ) crystallized in a parallel β‐sheet arrangement and are head‐to‐tail aligned in a direction perpendicular to the β‐sheet‐direction. Upon heating, crystals of 1 underwent single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal polymerization forming a triazole‐linked pseudoprotein with Gly‐Phe‐Gly repeats. During TAAC polymerization, the pseudoprotein evolved as helical chains. These helical chains are laterally assembled by backbone hydrogen bonding in a direction perpendicular to the helical axis to form helical sheets. This interesting helical‐sheet orientation in the crystal resembles the cross‐α‐amyloids, where α‐helices are arranged laterally as sheets.     

Ambidextrous α,γ‐Hybrid Peptide Foldamers

Molecular chirality is ubiquitous in nature. The natural biopolymers, proteins and DNA, preferred a right‐handed helical bias due to the inherent stereochemistry of the monomer building blocks. Here, we are reporting a rare co‐existence of left‐ and right‐handed helical conformations and helix‐terminating property at the C‐terminus within a single molecule of α,γ‐hybrid peptide foldamers composed of achiral Aib (α‐aminoisobutyric acid) and 3,3‐dimethyl‐substituted γ‐amino acid (Adb; 4‐amino‐3,3‐dimethylbutanoic acid). At the molecular level, the left‐ and right‐handed helical screw sense of α,γ‐hybrid peptides are representing a macroscopic tendril perversion. The pronounced helix‐terminating behaviour of C‐terminal Adb residues was further explored to design helix–Schellman loop mimetics and to study their conformations in solution and single crystals. The stereochemical constraints of dialkyl substitutions on γ‐amino acids showed a marked impact on the folding behaviour of α,γ‐hybrid peptides.     

The Propensity of α‐Aminoisobutyric Acid (=2‐Methylalanine; Aib) to Induce Helical Secondary Structure in an α‐Heptapeptide: A Computational Study

We present a molecular‐dynamics simulation study of an α‐heptapeptide containing an α‐aminoisobutyric acid (=2‐methylalanine; Aib) residue, Val¹‐Ala²‐Leu³‐Aib⁴‐Ile⁵‐Met⁶‐Phe⁷, and a quantum‐mechanical (QM) study of simplified models to investigate the propensity of the Aib residue to induce 3₁₀/α‐helical conformation. For comparison, we have also performed simulations of three analogues of the peptide with the Aib residue being replaced by L ‐Ala, D ‐Ala, and Gly, respectively, which provide information on the subtitution effect at C(α) (two Me groups for Aib, one for L ‐Ala and D ‐Ala, and zero for Gly). Our simulations suggest that, in MeOH, the heptapeptide hardly folds into canonical helical conformations, but appears to populate multiple conformations, i.e., C₇ and 3₁₀‐helical ones, which is in agreement with results from the QM calculations and NMR experiments. The populations of these conformations depend on the polarity of the solvent. Our study confirms that a short peptide, though with the presence of an Aib residue in the middle of the chain, does not have to fold to an α‐helical secondary structure. To generate a helical conformation for a linear peptide, several Aib residues should be present in the peptide, either sequentially or alternatively, to enhance the propensity of Aib‐containing peptides towards the helical conformation. A correction of a few of the published NMR data is reported.     

The N‐Terminal Nonapeptide of Cephaibols A and C: A Naturally Occurring Example of Mismatched Helical Screw‐Sense Control

The N‐terminal nonapeptide domain of the fungal nonribosomal peptide antibiotics cephaibol A and cephaibol C (AcPheAib₄LeuIvaGly‐ Aib) is reported to adopt a right‐handed helical conformation in the crystalline state. However, this conformation is at odds with the left‐handed helicity observed in solution in related synthetic oligomers capped with Ac‐L ‐PheAib₄ fragments. We report the synthesis of four diastereoisomers of the cephaibol N‐terminal nonapeptide, and show by NMR and CD spectroscopy that the peptide containing the chiral amino acids Phe and Leu in the naturally occurring relative configuration exists in solution as an interconverting mixture of helical screw‐sense conformers. In contrast, the nonapeptide containing the unnatural relative configuration at Phe and Leu adopts a single, stable helical screw‐sense, which is left handed when the N‐terminal Phe residue is L and right‐handed when the N‐terminal Phe residue is D .     

Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of Pentapeptides Containing Enantiomerically Pure 2,2‐Disubstituted Glycines

The synthesis and conformational analysis of model pentapeptides with the sequence Z‐Leu‐Aib‐Xaa‐Gln‐Valol is described. These peptides contain two 2,2‐disubstituted glycines (α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids), i.e., Aib (aminoisobutyric acid), and a series of unsymmetrically substituted, enantiomerically pure amino acids Xaa. These disubstituted amino acids were incorporated into the model peptides via the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’. Conformational analysis was performed in solution by means of NMR techniques and, in the solid state, by X‐ray crystallography. Both methods show that the backbones of these model peptides adopt helical conformations, as expected for 2,2‐disubstitued glycine‐containing peptides.     

Ethyl 6‐acetylamino‐6,7‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[a,c]cycloheptene‐6‐carboxylate

The title compound, C₂₀H₂₁NO₃, is a derivative of Aib (α‐­aminoisobutyric acid) and is cyclized at the C^α position by bi­phenyl rings. The seven‐membered ring possesses C2 symmetry. The C^α cyclization causes the backbone to assume a helical conformation in the crystal structure. The packing of the mol­ecules is stabilized by intermolecular C—H?O, C—H?π and N—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Foldamer‐Mediated Remote Stereocontrol: >1,60 Asymmetric Induction

An N‐terminal L ‐α‐methylvaline dimer induces complete conformational control over the screw sense of an otherwise achiral helical peptide foldamer formed from the achiral quaternary amino acids Aib and Ac₆c. The persistent right‐handed screw‐sense preference of the helix enables remote reactive sites to fall under the influence of the terminal chiral residues, and permits diastereoselective reactions such as alkene hydrogenation or iminium ion addition to take place with 1,16‐, 1,31‐, 1,46‐ and even 1,61‐asymmetric induction. Stereochemical information may be communicated in this way over distances of up to 4 nm.     

Synthesis of Aib‐ and Phe(2Me)‐Containing Cyclopentapeptides

Some recently described pentapeptides containing the α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids Aib and Phe(2Me) have been cyclized in DMF solution using diphenyl phosphorazidate (DPPA), O‐(1H‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl)‐N,N,N′,N′‐tetamethyluronium tetrafluoroborate/1‐hydroxybenzotriazole (TBTU/HOBt), and diethyl phosphorocyanidate (DEPC), respectively, to give the corresponding cyclopentapeptides in fair‐to‐good yields. In the case of peptides with L ‐amino acids, and (R)‐ and (S)‐Phe(2Me), the yields differed significantly in favor of the L /(R) combination. The conformations in the crystals of cyclo(Gly‐Aib‐(R,S)‐Phe(2Me)‐Aib‐Gly) and cyclo(Gly‐(R)‐Phe(2Me)‐Pro‐Aib‐Gly) have been determined by X‐ray crystallography, leading to quite different results. In the latter case, the conformation in solution has been elucidated by NMR studies.     

Conformation of Peptides Containing a Chiral α‐Ethylated α,α‐Disubstituted α‐Amino Acid: (S)‐α‐Ethylleucine (=(2S)‐2‐Amino‐2‐ethyl‐4‐methylpentanoic Acid) within Sequences of Dimethylglycine and Diethylglycine Residues

An optically active (S)‐α‐ethylleucine ((S)‐αEtLeu) as a chiral α‐ethylated α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acid was synthesized by means of a chiral acetal auxiliary of (R,R)‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐diol. The chiral α‐ethylated α,α‐disubstituted amino acid (S)‐αEtLeu was introduced into the peptides constructed from 2‐aminoisobutyric acid (=dimethylglycine, Aib), and also into the peptide prepared from diethylglycine (Deg). The X‐ray crystallographic analysis revealed that both right‐handed (P) and left‐handed (M) 3₁₀‐helical structures exist in the solid state of CF₃CO‐(Aib)₂‐[(S)‐αEtLeu]‐(Aib)₂‐OEt ( 14 ) and CF₃CO‐[(S)‐αEtLeu]‐(Deg)₄‐OEt ( 18 ), respectively. The IR, CD, and ¹H‐NMR spectra indicated that the dominant conformation of pentapeptides 14 and CF₃CO‐[(S)‐αEtLeu]‐(Aib)₄‐OEt ( 16 ) in solution is a 3₁₀‐helical structure, and that of 18 in solution is a planar C₅ conformation. The conformation of peptides was also studied by molecular‐mechanics calculations.     

A Novel 2H‐Azirin‐3‐amine as a Dipeptide (Aib‐Hyp) Synthon

The synthesis of methyl (2S,4R)‐4‐(benzyloxy)‐N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)prolinate ( 10 ), a novel 2H‐azirin‐3‐amine (`3‐amino‐2H‐azirine'), is described (Scheme 1). The reaction of methyl (2S,4R)‐N‐(2‐methylpropanoyl)‐4‐(benzyloxy)prolinate ( 7 ) with Lawesson reagent gave methyl (2S,4R)‐4‐(benzyloxy)‐N‐[2‐(methylthio)propanoyl]prolinate ( 8 ) and consecutive treatment with COCl₂, 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO), and NaN₃ led to 10 . The use of 10 as a building block of the dipeptide Aib‐Hyp (Aib=2‐aminoisobutyric acid, Hyp=(2S,4R)‐4‐hydroxyproline) is demonstrated by the syntheses of several model peptides (Scheme 2 and Table). The benzyl protecting group of the 4‐OH function in Hyp in the model peptides has been removed in good yields.     

Conformational Study of Heteropentapeptides Containing an α‐Ethylated α,α‐Disubstituted Amino Acid: (S)‐Butylethylglycine (=2‐Amino‐2‐ethylhexanoic Acid) within a Sequence of Dimethylglycine (=2‐Aminoisobutyric Acid) Residues

Heteropentapeptides containing the α‐ethylated α,α‐disubstituted amino acid (S)‐butylethylglycine and four dimethylglycine residues, i.e., CF₃CO‐[(S)‐Beg]‐(Aib)₄‐OEt ( 4 ) and CF₃CO‐(Aib)₂‐[(S)‐Beg]‐(Aib)₂‐OEt ( 7 ), were synthesized by conventional solution methods. In the solid state, the preferred conformation of 4 was shown to be both a right‐handed (P) and a left‐handed (M) 3₁₀‐helical structure, and that of 7 was a right‐handed (P) 3₁₀‐helical structure. IR, CD, and ¹H‐NMR spectra revealed that the dominant conformation of both 4 and 7 in solution was the 3₁₀‐helical structure. These conformations were also supported by molecular‐mechanics calculations.     

Efficient Access to Enantiopure γ4‐Amino Acids with Proteinogenic Side‐Chains and Structural Investigation of γ4‐Asn and γ4‐Ser in Hybrid Peptide Helices

Hybrid peptides composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids have recently emerged as new class of peptide foldamers. Comparatively, γ‐ and hybrid γ‐peptides composed of γ⁴‐amino acids are less studied than their β‐counterparts. However, recent investigations reveal that γ⁴‐amino acids have a higher propensity to fold into ordered helical structures. As amino acid side‐chain functional groups play a crucial role in the biological context, the objective of this study was to investigate efficient synthesis of γ⁴‐residues with functional proteinogenic side‐chains and their structural analysis in hybrid‐peptide sequences. Here, the efficient and enantiopure synthesis of various N‐ and C‐terminal free‐γ⁴‐residues, starting from the benzyl esters (COOBzl) of N‐Cbz‐protected (E)‐α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids through multiple hydrogenolysis and double‐bond reduction in a single‐pot catalytic hydrogenation is reported. The crystal conformations of eight unprotected γ⁴‐amino acids (γ⁴‐Val, γ⁴‐Leu, γ⁴‐Ile, γ⁴‐Thr(OtBu), γ⁴‐Tyr, γ⁴‐Asp(OtBu), γ⁴‐Glu(OtBu), and γ‐Aib) reveals that these amino acids adopted a helix favoring gauche conformations along the central C^γ? C^β bond. To study the behavior of γ⁴‐residues with functional side chains in peptide sequences, two short hybrid γ‐peptides P1 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Asn‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐CONH₂) and P2 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Ser‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐CONH₂) were designed, synthesized on solid phase, and their 12‐helical conformation in single crystals were studied. Remarkably, the γ⁴‐Asn residue in P1 facilitates the tetrameric helical aggregations through interhelical H bonding between the side‐chain amide groups. Furthermore, the hydroxyl side‐chain of γ⁴‐Ser in P2 is involved in the interhelical H bonding with the backbone amide group. In addition, the analysis of 87 γ⁴‐residues in peptide single‐crystals reveal that the γ⁴‐residues in 12‐helices are more ordered as compared with the 10/12‐ and 12/14‐helices.     

Scope and Limitation of the Acid‐Catalyzed Isomerization of Aib‐Containing Thiopeptides

The use of amino thio S‐acids in the `azirine/oxazolone method' and a novel isomerization led to Aib‐containing endothiopeptides. With the aim of generalizing this method, a variety of Aib‐containing dipeptide thioanilides have been prepared. By their treatment with ZnCl₂ in AcOH, followed by HCl‐saturated AcOH, the C=S group was shifted from the last to the penultimate amino acid in high yield and without epimerization. As this methodology is very useful for the specific introduction of a thioamide group, it was extended to Aib‐containing tripeptides. In addition, it could be shown that a mechanism via spirocyclic intermediates (cf. Scheme 4) is most likely for this isomerization. To establish the proposed neighboring‐group participation of the N‐acyl group, model dipeptide thioanilides containing no N‐terminal C=O group were synthesized. These derivatives did not undergo rearrangement.     

A Chirally Stable,Atropoisomeric, Cα‐Tetrasubstituted α‐Amino Acid: Incorporation into Model Peptides and Conformational Preference

A variety of model peptides, including four complete homologous series, to the pentamer level, characterized by the recently proposed binaphthyl‐based, axially chiral, C^α‐tetrasubstituted, cyclic α‐amino acid Bin, in combination with Ala, Gly, or Aib residues, was synthesized by solution methods and fully characterized. The solution conformational propensity of these peptides was determined by FT‐IR absorption and ¹H‐NMR techniques. Moreover, the molecular structures of the free amino acid (S)‐enantiomer and an N^α‐acylated dipeptide alkylamide with the heterochiral sequence ‐(R)‐Bin‐Phe‐ were assessed in the crystal state by X‐ray diffraction. Taken together, the results point to the conclusion that β‐bends and 3₁₀ helices are preferentially adopted by Bin‐containing peptides, although the fully extended conformation would also be adopted in solution by the short oligomers to some extent. We also confirmed the tendency of (R)‐Bin to fold a peptide chain into right‐handed bend and helical structures. The absolute configuration of the Bin residue(s) was correlated with the typically intense exciton‐split Cotton effect of the ¹B_b binaphthyl transition near 225 nm.