catena‐Poly[[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ2O,O′)cobalt(II)]‐μ‐1,3‐di‐4‐pyridylpropane‐κ2N:N′]: a one‐dimensional coordination polymer capable of forming clathrates with prochiral aldehydes

The title compound, [Co(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)]_n, forms a coordination polymer in which the Co^II centre is located on an inversion centre and the 1,3‐di‐4‐pyridylpropane ligand is located on a twofold axis. The polymeric chains are parallel and are held together by weak intermolecular C—H...O interactions. The complex is intended as a possible host for prochiral aldehydes and ketones, and one clathrate was isolated with p‐tolylaldehyde.     

4‐(Pyrrol‐1‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₆H₆N₄, comprises one and a half molecules with a C₂ axis through the second molecule. Each molecule consists of two planar five‐membered rings connected by a triazole–pyrrole N—N bond with the triazole ring close to being at right angles to the pyrrole ring. The molecules are linked by C—H...N hydrogen bonds and weaker offset face‐to‐face π–π interactions.     

Weak intermolecular interactions in isomorphous 5‐(2‐chloroethoxy)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzodioxine and 5‐(2‐bromoethoxy)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,4‐benzodioxine: bonding or nonbonding interactions

The title compounds, C₁₀H₁₁ClO₃, (I), and C₁₀H₁₁BrO₃, (II), are isomorphous and effectively isostructural; all of the interatomic distances and angles are normal. The structures exhibit long intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...π contacts with attractive energies ranging from 1.17 to 2.30 kJ mol⁻¹. Weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds form C(3) and C(4) motifs, combining to form a two‐dimensional R₃⁴(12) net. No face‐to‐face stacking interactions are observed.     

Synthesis, π‐Face‐Selective Aggregation,and π‐Face Chiral Recognition of Configurationally Stable C3‐Symmetric Propeller‐Chiral Molecules with a π‐Core

The C₃‐symmetric propeller‐chiral compounds (P,P,P)‐ 1 and (M,M,M)‐ 1 with planar π‐cores perpendicular to the C₃‐axis were synthesized in optically pure states. (P,P,P)‐ 1 possesses two distinguishable propeller‐chiral π‐faces with rims of different heights named the (P/L)‐face and (P/H)‐face. Each face is configurationally stable because of the rigid structure of the helicenes contained in the π‐core. (P,P,P)‐ 1 formed dimeric aggregates in organic solutions as indicated by the results of ¹H NMR, CD, and UV/Vis spectroscopy and vapor pressure osmometry analyses. The (P/L)/(P/L) interactions were observed in the solid state by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis, and they were also predominant over the (P/H)/(P/H) and (P/L)/(P/H) interactions in solution, as indicated by the results of ¹H and 2D NMR spectroscopy analyses. The dimerization constant was obtained for a racemic mixture, which showed that the heterochiral (P,P,P)‐ 1 /(M,M,M)‐ 1 interactions were much weaker than the homochiral (P,P,P)‐ 1 /(P,P,P)‐ 1 interactions. The results indicated that the propeller‐chiral (P/L)‐face interacts with the (P/L)‐face more strongly than with the (P/H)‐face, (M/L)‐face, and (M/H)‐face. The study showed the π‐face‐selective aggregation and π‐face chiral recognition of the configurationally stable propeller‐chiral molecules.     

catena‐Poly­[[[cis‐bis(1‐phenyl­tetra­zole‐κN4)copper(II)]‐di‐μ‐chloro] hemi(1‐phenyl­tetrazole)]

The title compound, {[CuCl₂(PhTz)₂]·0.5PhTz}_n (PhTz is 1‐­phenyl­tetrazole, C₇H₆N₄), has a polymeric structure, with uncoordinated disordered PhTz mol­ecules in the cavities. The coordination polyhedron of the Cu atom is a highly elongated octahedron. The equatorial positions are occupied by two Cl atoms [Cu—Cl = 2.2687 (9) and 2.2803 (7) Å] and two N atoms of the PhTz ligands [Cu—N = 2.0131 (19) and 2.0317 (18) Å]. The more distant axial positions are occupied by two Cl atoms [Cu—Cl = 3.0307 (12) and 2.8768 (11) Å] that lie in the equatorial planes of two neighbouring Cu octahedra. The [CuCl₂(PhTz)₂] units are linked by Cu—Cl bridges into infinite chains extending parallel to the a axis. The chains are linked into two‐dimensional networks by intermolecular C—H⋯N interactions between the phenyl and tetrazole fragments, and by face‐to‐face π–π interactions between symmetry‐related phenyl rings. These two‐dimensional networks, which lie parallel to the ac plane, are connected by intermolecular π–π stacking interactions between phenyl rings, thus forming a three‐dimensional network.     

Aqua­di­chloro­(di‐2‐pyridyl­di­azene)copper(II) monohydrate

The crystal structure of the mononuclear title complex, [CuCl₂(C₁₀H₈N₄)(H₂O)]·H₂O, shows an s‐cis/E/s‐trans‐configured di‐2‐pyridyl­diazene ligand, with the square‐pyramidal Cu^II ion coordinated to one pyridyl and one diazene N atom together with two Cl atoms and one aqua ligand. The crystal packing involves both hydrogen‐bonding and π–π interactions. The solvent water mol­ecule links three monomers to one another through hydrogen‐bonding interactions in which two monomers are linked via chloro ligands and the third via the aqua ligand. Face‐to‐face and weak slipped π–π interactions also occur between di‐2‐pyridyl­diazene moieties, and these interactions are responsible for the interchain packing.     

Structures and Properties of Molecular Torsion Balances to Decipher the Nature of Substituent Effects on the Aromatic Edge‐to‐Face Interaction

Various recent computational studies initiated this systematic re‐investigation of substituent effects on aromatic edge‐to‐face interactions. Five series of Tröger base derived molecular torsion balances (MTBs), initially introduced by Wilcox and co‐workers, showing an aromatic edge‐to‐face interaction in the folded, but not in the unfolded form, were synthesized. A fluorine atom or a trifluoromethyl group was introduced onto the edge ring in ortho‐, meta‐, and para‐positions to the C?H group interacting with the face component. The substituents on the face component were varied from electron‐donating to electron‐withdrawing. Extensive X‐ray crystallographic data allowed for a discussion on the conformational behavior of the torsional balances in the solid state. While most systems adopt the folded conformation, some were found to form supramolecular intercalative dimers, lacking the intramolecular edge‐to‐face interaction, which is compensated by the gain of aromatic π‐stacking interactions between four aryl rings of the two molecular components. This dimerization does not take place in solution. The folding free enthalpy ΔG_fold of all torsion balances was determined by ¹H NMR measurements by using 10 mM solutions of samples in CDCl₃ and C₆D₆. Only the ΔG_fold values of balances bearing an edge‐ring substituent in ortho‐position to the interacting C?H show a steep linear correlation with the Hammett parameter (σ_meta) of the face‐component substituent. Thermodynamic analysis using van′t Hoff plots revealed that the interaction is enthalpy‐driven. The ΔG_fold values of the balances, in addition to partial charge calculations, suggest that increasing the polarization of the interacting C?H group makes a favorable contribution to the edge‐to‐face interaction. The largest contribution, however, seems to originate from local direct interactions between the substituent in ortho‐position to the edge‐ring C?H and the substituted face ring.     

The bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene‐based ionic charge‐transfer complex with 2,3‐dichloro‐5,6‐dicyano‐p‐benzoquinone

In the ionic charge‐transfer (CT) complex composed of bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene (ET) and 2,3‐dichloro‐5,6‐dicyano‐p‐benzoquinone (DDQ), C₁₀H₈S₈·C₈Cl₂N₂O₂, the donor and acceptor molecules both form centrosymmetric dimers associated by strong face‐to‐face π–π interactions. The disordered DDQ molecules form a one‐dimensional π‐stacked column, while the ET molecules form a two‐leg ladder through additional short S...S contacts between adjacent π–π‐bonded dimers. The crystal structure of ET–DDQ revealed in this study will provide a valuable example of the two‐leg spin ladder system, which has rarely been reported for ET‐based CT complexes.     

3‐Oxa‐6,8‐diaza‐1,2:4,5‐dibenzocycloocta‐1,4‐dien‐7‐one: a three‐dimensional network assembled by hydrogen‐bonding, π–π and edge‐to‐face interactions

The title compound, C₁₃H₁₀N₂O₂, is the first structure in which the urea moiety is incorporated into an eight‐membered ring. Two mol­ecules are found in the asymmetric unit, which are almost identical in their conformation and their hydrogen‐bond pattern. The carbonyl O atom acts as a double acceptor for the NH groups of two adjacent mol­ecules. In this way, infinite tapes are formed, which are connected viaπ–π and edge‐to‐face interactions in the second and third dimension. This hierarchical order of interactions is confirmed by molecular mechanics calculations. Force‐field and semi‐empirical calculations for a single mol­ecule did not find the envelope conformation present in the crystal, indicating instead a C_s conformation. Only with a model consisting of a hydrogen‐bonded dimer or a larger hydrogen‐bonded section was a conformation found that was similar to the one present in the crystal.     

Two regioisomers of condensed thioheterocyclic triazine synthesized from 6‐phenyl‐3‐thioxo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5‐one

In the crystal structure of 6‐phenyl‐3‐thioxo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5‐one, C₉H₇N₃OS, (I), the 1,2,4‐triazine moieties are connected by face‐to‐face contacts through two kinds of double hydrogen bonds (N—H...O and N—H...S), which form planar ribbons along the a axis. The ribbons are crosslinked through C—H...π interactions between the phenyl rings. The molecular structures of two regioisomeric compounds, namely 6‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐7H‐1,3‐thiazolo[3,2‐b][1,2,4]triazin‐7‐one, C₁₁H₉N₃OS, (II), and 3‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐4H‐1,3‐thiazolo[2,3‐c][1,2,4]triazin‐4‐one, C₁₁H₉N₃OS, (III), which were prepared by the condensation reaction of (I) with 1,2‐dibromoethane, have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography and spectroscopic studies. The crystal structures of (II) and (III) both show two crystallographically independent molecules. While the two compounds are isomers, the unit‐cell parameters and crystal packing are quite different and (II) has a chiral crystal structure.     

Herring‐bone π–π interactions in trans‐2,6‐diphenyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydrothiapyran‐4‐one

The structure of the title compound, C₁₇H₁₆OS, is primarily stabilized by T‐shaped and parallel‐displaced aromatic clusters. The distances between the centroids of the aromatic pairs are in the range 4.34–5.30 Å. In the crystal packing, the mol­ecules dimerize by means of π–π interactions of both face‐to‐face and edge‐to‐face types, and the aromatic rings associate in a cyclic edge‐to‐face tetrameric arrangement of the herring‐bone type. These herring‐bone interactions appear to insulate hydrogen‐bond interactions in the crystal structure.     

3,17‐Dioxoandrost‐4‐en‐4‐yl acetate

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₈O₄, has a 4‐acetoxy substituent positioned on the steroid α face. The six‐membered ring A assumes a conformation intermediate between 1α,2β‐half chair and 1α‐sofa. A long Csp³—Csp³ bond is observed in ring B and reproduced in quantum‐mechanical ab initio calculations of the isolated molecule using a molecular‐orbital Hartree–Fock method. Cohesion of the crystal can be attributed to van der Waals interactions and weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds.     

Benzyl N,N‐bis[2‐(pentafluoroanilino)ethyl]carbamate

The title compound, C₂₄H₁₇F₁₀N₃O₂, exhibits intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonding, as well as intramolecular Ar...Ar^F face‐to‐face interactions. The molecules are linked together by N—H...F—C hydrogen bonds, forming chains parallel to the a axis. Adjacent symmetry‐related chains are combined in double zipper‐like ribbons by parallel Ar^F...Ar^F offset π‐stacking interactions.     

(2E)‐N‐(2‐Iodo‐4,6‐dimethylphenyl)‐2‐methylbut‐2‐enamide

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₈INO, crystallizes as +sc/+sp/+sc 2‐iodoanilide molecules (and racemic opposites) and shows significant intermolecular I...O interactions in the solid state, forming dimeric pairs about centres of symmetry. Under asymmetric Heck conditions, the S enantiomer of the dihydroindol‐2‐one was obtained using (R)‐(+)‐2,2′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐1,1′‐binaphthyl [(R)‐BINAP], suggesting a mechanism that proceeds by oxidative addition to give the title (P) enantiomer of the compound and pro‐S coordination of the Re face of the alkene in a conformation similar to that defined crystallographically, except that rotation about the C—C bond of the butenyl group is required.     

2,3‐Dihydro‐1,3‐benzothiazol‐2‐iminium monohydrogen sulfate and 2‐iminio‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐benzothiazole‐6‐sulfonate: a combined structural and theoretical study

The 2‐aminobenzothiazole sulfonation intermediate 2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐benzothiazol‐2‐iminium monohydrogen sulfate, C₇H₇N₂S⁺·HSO₄⁻, (I), and the final product 2‐iminio‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐benzothiazole‐6‐sulfonate, C₇H₆N₂O₃S₂, (II), both have the endocyclic N atom protonated; compound (I) exists as an ion pair and (II) forms a zwitterion. Intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds are seen in both structures, with bonding energy (calculated on the basis of density functional theory) ranging from 1.06 to 14.15 kcal mol⁻¹. Hydrogen bonding in (I) and (II) creates DDDD and C(8)C(9)C(9) first‐level graph sets, respectively. Face‐to‐face stacking interactions are observed in both (I) and (II), but they are extremely weak.     

catena‐Poly[[[(di‐2‐pyridylamine‐κ2N2,N2′)copper(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ3O1,O1′:O3] monohydrate], a zigzag coordination polymer with strong π–π interactions

The novel title coordination polymer, {[Cu(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]·H₂O}_n, synthesized by the slow‐diffusion method, takes the form of one‐dimensional zigzag chains built up of Cu^II cations linked by benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate (ipht) anions. An exceptional characteristic of this structure is that it belongs to a small group of metal–organic polymers where ipht is coordinated as a bridging tridentate ligand with monodentate and chelate coordination of individual carboxylate groups. The Cu^II cation has a highly distorted square‐pyramidal geometry formed by three O atoms from two ipht anions and two N atoms from a di‐2‐pyridylamine (dipya) ligand. The zigzag chains, which run along the b axis, further construct a three‐dimensional metal–organic framework via strong face‐to‐face π–π interactions and hydrogen bonds. A solvent water molecule is linked to the different carboxylate groups via hydrogen bonds. Thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric analyses confirm the strong hydrogen bonding.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Magnetic Properties of Two Novel Cobalt(II) Coordination Polymers Constructed from Pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic Acid N‐oxide (PDCO)

Two new cobalt(II) coordination polymers, [Co(PDCO)(H₂O)₂]_n ( 1 ) and [Co(PDCO)(bix)(2H₂O)₂·H₂O]_n ( 2 ) ( PDCO= pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylic acid N‐oxide, bix = 1,4‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)‐benzene) have been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Single‐crystal X‐ray analyses show that compound 1 is a 1D helical chainlike structure with 4₁ screw axes parallel to the crystallographic c‐axis and interchain hydrogen‐bonding interactions further result in a 3D framework; for compound 2 , each bix ligand connects two Co1 atoms (or two Co2 atoms) to give a zigzag chain structure and these 1D chains are connected by offset face‐to‐face π···π and hydrogen bond interactions to generate a 3D architecture. The thermogravimetric analyses were investigated for 1 and 2 . The determination of variable temperature magnetic susceptibilities indicates an antiferromagnetic interaction between the metal atoms for 1 and 2 .     

Twodimensional Metal‐Organic Framework [Zn(bqdc)]n (bqdc = 2,2′‐biquinoline‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate) – Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Spectral Characterization

A new two‐dimensional metal‐organic framework [Zn(bqdc)]_n (bqdc = 2,2′‐biquinoline‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate) was obtained by the reaction of ligand 2,2′‐biquinoline‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂bqdc) and Zn(CH₃COO)₂·2H₂O under hydrothermal conditions. It has been characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H‐NMR and single crystal X‐ray crystallography. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n and exhibits a 2D zig‐zag network, assisted by face‐to‐face π‐π interactions of quinoline rings. In addition, it has a fluorescence emission in the solution state at room temperature.     

Poly­[[bis­(pyridine‐κN)copper(II)]‐μ3‐5‐hydroxy­isophthalato‐κ3O:O′:O′′]

In the title compound, [Cu(C₈H₄O₅)(C₅H₅N)₂]_n or [Cu(OH‐BDC)(py)₂]_n (where OH‐H₂BDC is 5‐hydroxy­isophthalic acid and py is pyridine), the Cu atoms are coordinated by two N atoms from the pyridine ligands and by three O atoms from hydroxy­isophthalate ligands in a highly distorted triangular bipyramidal environment, with Cu—O distances in the range 1.941 (4)–2.225 (5) Å and Cu—N distances of 2.014 (6) and 2.046 (6) Å. The [Cu(OH‐BDC)]_n two‐dimensional network is built up from interlocking 22‐, 15‐ and eight‐membered rings via sharing of Cu atoms and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Consolidation of the packing structure is achieved by edge‐ or point‐to‐face C—H⋯π interactions and offset or slipped π–π stacking interactions.     

Efficient Cluster‐Based Catalysts for Asymmetric Hydrogenation of α‐Unsaturated Carboxylic Acids

The new clusters [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(μ‐1,2‐P‐P)], [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(1,1‐P‐P)] and [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₁(P‐P)] (P‐P=chiral diphosphine of the ferrocene‐based Josiphos or Walphos ligand families) have been synthesised and characterised. The crystal and molecular structures of eleven clusters reveal that the coordination modes of the diphosphine in the [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(μ‐1,2‐P‐P)] clusters are different for the Josiphos and the Walphos ligands. The Josiphos ligands bridge a metal–metal bond of the ruthenium tetrahedron in the “conventional” manner, that is, with both phosphine moieties coordinated in equatorial positions relative to a triangular face of the tetrahedron, whereas the phosphine moieties of the Walphos ligands coordinate in one axial and one equatorial position. The differences in the ligand size and the coordination mode between the two types of ligands appear to be reflected in a relative propensity for isomerisation; in solution, the [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(1,1‐Walphos)] clusters isomerise to the corresponding [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(μ‐1,2‐Walphos)] clusters, whereas the Josiphos‐containing clusters show no tendency to isomerisation in solution. The clusters have been tested as catalysts for asymmetric hydrogenation of four prochiral α‐unsaturated carboxylic acids and the prochiral methyl ester (E)‐methyl 2‐methylbut‐2‐enoate. High conversion rates (>94 %) and selectivities of product formation were observed for almost all catalysts/catalyst precursors. The observed enantioselectivities were low or nonexistent for the Josiphos‐containing clusters and catalyst (cluster) recovery was low, suggesting that cluster fragmentation takes place. On the other hand, excellent conversion rates (99–100 %), product selectivities (99–100 % in most cases) and good enantioselectivities, reaching 90 % enantiomeric excess (ee) in certain cases, were observed for the Walphos‐containing clusters, and the clusters could be recovered in good yield after completed catalysis. Results from high‐pressure NMR and IR studies, catalyst poisoning tests and comparison of catalytic properties of two [H₄Ru₄(CO)₁₀(μ‐1,2‐P‐P)] clusters (P‐P=Walphos ligands) with the analogous mononuclear catalysts [Ru(P‐P)(carboxylato)₂] suggest that these clusters may be the active catalytic species, or direct precursors of an active catalytic cluster species.