Precautionary paying for stochastic improvements under background risks

In a two-dimensional framework, we propose a general two-period decision model which extends the temporal precautionary saving and effort model. We relate the role of cross-prudence to the impact of background risks on paying for stochastic improvements of the future risk. We find that the effect of background risks introduced in the first period is consistent to signing cross derivatives of bivariate utility functions, which is independent of the type of stochastic improvements brought by additional paying; however, when the background risk occurs in the second period, that is not the case.     

On expected utility for financial insurance portfolios with stochastic dependencies

The effect of background risks as human capital, market risks and catastrophic events has been considered in the literature in different contexts. In this note, we consider financial insurance portfolios with insurable risks and one background risk (uninsurable financial asset), such that the random losses and the background risk depend on environmental parameters. We study how dependencies between the risks influence the expected utility of the portfolio’s wealth distribution under risk aversion, when the environmental parameters are random. Stochastic bounds for the expected wealth are given from modeling the dependence between the parameters by different notions. Similar results are given for multivariate portfolios with n groups and multivariate risk aversion, besides an expected utility comparison result for the minimum and the total portfolio’s wealth.     

Ambiguity aversion, higher-order risk attitude and optimal effort

In this paper, we examine whether a more ambiguity-averse individual will invest in more effort to shift her initial starting wealth distribution toward a better target distribution. We assume that the individual has ambiguous beliefs regarding two target (starting) distributions and that one distribution is preferred to the other. We find that an increase in ambiguity aversion will decrease (increase) the optimal effort when the cost of effort is non-monetary. When the cost of effort is monetary, the effect depends on whether the individual would make more effort when the target (starting) distribution is the preferred distribution than the target (starting) distributions, the inferior one. We further characterize the individual’s higher-order risk preferences to examine the sufficient conditions.     

Optimal insurance in the presence of insurer’s loss limit

In this paper we consider the optimal insurance problem when the insurer has a loss limit constraint. Under the assumptions that the insurance price depends only on the policy’s actuarial value, and the insured seeks to maximize the expected utility of his terminal wealth, we show that coverage above a deductible up to a cap is the optimal contract, and the relaxation of insurer’s loss limit will increase the insured’s expected utility.When the insurance price is given by the expected value principle, we show that a positive loading factor is a sufficient and necessary condition for the deductible to be positive. Moreover, with the expected value principle, we show that the optimal deductible derived in our model is not greater (lower) than that derived in Arrow’s model if the insured’s preference displays increasing (decreasing) absolute risk aversion. Therefore, when the insured has an IARA (DARA) utility function, compared to Arrow model, the insurance policy derived in our model provides more (less) coverage for small losses, and less coverage for large losses.Furthermore, we prove that the optimal insurance derived in our model is an inferior (normal) good for the insured with a DARA (IARA) utility function, consistent with the finding in the previous literature. Being inferior, the insurance can also be a Giffen good. Under the assumption that the insured’s initial wealth is greater than a certain level, we show that the insurance is not a Giffen good if the coefficient of the insured’s relative risk aversion is lower than 1.     

Functional ANOVA,ultramodularity and monotonicity: Applications in multiattribute utility theory

Utility function properties as monotonicity and concavity play a fundamental role in reflecting a decision-maker’s preference structure. These properties are usually characterized via partial derivatives. However, elicitation methods do not necessarily lead to twice-differentiable utility functions. Furthermore, while in a single-attribute context concavity fully reflects risk aversion, in multiattribute problems such correspondence is not one-to-one. We show that Tsetlin and Winkler’s multivariate risk attitudes imply ultramodularity of the utility function. We demonstrate that geometric properties of a multivariate utility function can be successfully studied by utilizing an integral function expansion (functional ANOVA). The necessary and sufficient conditions under which monotonicity and/or ultramodularity of single-attribute functions imply the monotonicity and/or ultramodularity of the corresponding multiattribute function under additive, preferential and mutual utility independence are then established without reliance on the utility function differentiability. We also investigate the relationship between the presence of interactions among the attributes of a multiattribute utility function and the decision-maker’s multivariate risk attitudes.     

Own-company stockholding and work effort preferences of an unconstrained executive

We develop a framework for analyzing an executive’s own-company stockholding and work effort preferences. The executive, characterized by risk aversion and work effectiveness parameters, invests his personal wealth without constraint in the financial market, including the stock of his own company whose value he can directly influence with work effort. The executive’s utility-maximizing personal investment and work effort strategy is derived in closed form, and a utility indifference rationale is applied to determine his required compensation. Being unconstrained by performance contracting, the executive’s work effort strategy establishes a base case for theoretical or empirical assessment of the benefits or otherwise of constraining executives with performance contracting.     

通胀风险下基于HARA效用的DC型养老金计划

通货膨胀是养老基金管理过程中最直接最重要的影响因素之一. 假设通胀风险由服从几何布朗运动的物价指数来度量, 且瞬时期望通货膨胀率由Ornstein-Uhlenbeck过程来驱动. 金融市场由n+1种可连续交易的风险资产所构成, 养老基金管理者期望研究和解决通胀风险环境下DC型养老基金在累积阶段的最优投资策略问题, 以最大化终端真实财富过程的期望效用. 双曲绝对风险厌恶(HARA)效用函数具有一般的效用框架, 包含幂效用、指数效用和对数效用作为特例. 假设投资者对风险的偏好程度满足HARA效用, 运用随机最优控制理论和Legendre变换方法得到了最优投资策略的显式表达式.     

Prevention efforts,insurance demand and price incentives under coherent risk measures

This paper studies an equilibrium model between an insurance buyer and an insurance seller, where both parties’ risk preferences are given by convex risk measures. The interaction is modeled through a Stackelberg type game, where the insurance seller plays first by offering prices, in the form of safety loadings. Then the insurance buyer chooses his optimal proportional insurance share and his optimal prevention effort in order to minimize his risk measure. The loss distribution is given by a family of stochastically ordered probability measures, indexed by the prevention effort. We give special attention to the problems of self-insurance and self-protection, and show that if the buyer’s risk measure decreases faster in effort than his expected loss, optimal effort is non-decreasing in the safety loading with a potential discontinuity when optimal coverage switches from full to zero. On the contrary, if the decrease of the buyer’s risk measure is slower than the expected loss, optimal effort may or may not be non-decreasing in the safety loading. In case of Pareto distributed losses, the seller sets the highest possible price under which the buyer still prefers full insurance over no insurance. We also analyze the case of discrete distributions: on the one hand, for self-protection, under the assumption that the marginal impact of the effort is higher on small losses than it is on catastrophic losses, the optimal effort is non-decreasing in the safety loading. On the other hand, in the case of self-protection, more conditions are needed, in particular, we obtain sufficient conditions for the optimal effort to be non-decreasing or non-monotone in the safety loading.     

Optimal insurance under the insurer’s risk constraint

In this paper, we impose the insurer’s risk constraint on Arrow’s optimal insurance model. The insured aims to maximize his/her expected utility of terminal wealth, under the constraint that the insurer wishes to control the expected loss of his/her terminal wealth below some prespecified level. We solve the problem, and it is shown that when the insurer’s risk constraint is binding, the solution to the problem is not linear, but piecewise linear deductible. Moreover, it can be shown that the insured’s optimal expected utility will increase if the insurer increases his/her risk tolerance.     

Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment with transaction costs, I: Maximizing the terminal wealth

We consider a problem of optimal reinsurance and investment with multiple risky assets for an insurance company whose surplus is governed by a linear diffusion. The insurance company’s risk can be reduced through reinsurance, while in addition the company invests its surplus in a financial market with one risk-free asset and n risky assets. In this paper, we consider the transaction costs when investing in the risky assets. Also, we use Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to control the whole risk. We consider the optimization problem of maximizing the expected exponential utility of terminal wealth and solve it by using the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. Explicit expression for the optimal value function and the corresponding optimal strategies are obtained.     

Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science

Very often in decision problems with uni- or multivariate objective, many results depend upon the signs of successive direct or cross derivatives of the utility function at least up to the 4th order. The purpose of the present paper is to provide a new and unified interpretation of these signs. It is based on the observation that decision-makers like to combine assets the return of which are negatively correlated (i.e., they have a preference for hedging). More specifically, this attitude is modelled through the concept of an “elementary correlation increasing transformation” defined by Epstein and Tanny (Can. J. Econ. 13:16–34, 1980). Decision-makers are said to be correlation averse if they dislike such a transformation. It will be shown that correlation aversion underlies many aspects of a decision-maker’s behavior under risk, including risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Hence, correlation aversion provides a unifying, elegant and powerful framework to analyze risky decisions in the bivariate case. In this framework, also the concave version of the bivariate stochastic orderings introduced in Denuit, Lefèvre and Mesfioui (Insur. Math. Econ. 24:31–50, 1999a) turns out to be appropriate for comparing correlated outcomes and for comparing bivariate distributions with ordered marginals. The main result of this paper states that a decision-maker who is averse to correlation would rank bivariate outcomes as if using such higher order concave stochastic orderings. In particular, some features of decision-making under bidimensional risk, such as cross-prudence and cross-temperance, can also be linked to correlation aversion.     

Asset allocation under loss aversion and minimum performance constraint in a DC pension plan with inflation risk

In this paper we investigate an optimal investment strategy for a defined-contribution (DC) pension plan member who is loss averse, pays close attention to inflation and longevity risks and requires a minimum performance at retirement. The member aims to maximize the expected S-shaped utility from the terminal wealth exceeding the minimum performance by investing her wealth in a financial market consisting of an indexed bond, a stock and a risk-free asset. We derive the optimal investment strategy in closed-form using the martingale approach. Our theoretical and numerical results reveal that the wealth proportion invested in each risky asset has a V-shaped pattern in the reference point level, while it always increases in the rising lifespan; with a positive correlation between salary and inflation risks, the presence of salary decreases the member’s investment in risky assets; the minimum performance helps to hedge the longevity risk by increasing her investment in risky assets.     

New results on the relationship among risk aversion,prudence and temperance

This note studies the relationships between different aspects of agent’s preferences toward risk. We show that, under the assumptions of non-satiation and bounded marginal utility, prudence implies risk aversion (imprudence implies risk loving) and that temperance implies prudence (intemperance implies imprudence). The implications of these results for comparing risks in the cases of increase in risk, increase in downside risk and increase in outer risk are discussed.     

Portfolio selection and duality under mean variance preferences

This paper uses duality to analyze an investor’s behavior in a n-asset portfolio selection problem when the investor has mean variance preferences. The indirect utility and wealth requirement functions are used to derive Roy’s identity, Shephard’s lemma and the Slutsky equation. In our simple Slutsky equation the income effect is characterized by decreasing absolute risk aversion (DARA) and the substitution effect is always positive [negative] with respect to an asset’s holding if the asset’s mean return [risk] increases. Substitution effect and income effect work in the same direction presupposed mean variance preferences display DARA.     

Exponential risk measure with application to UK asset allocation

In the paper the exponential risk measure of Damant and Satchell is used to formulate an investor's utility function and the properties of this function are investigated. The utility function is calibrated for a typical UK investor who would hold different proportions of equity. It is found that, for plausible parameter values, a typical UK investor will hold more equity under the assumption of non-normality of return if his utility function has the above formulation and not the standard mean-variance utility function. Furthermore, our utility function is consistent with positive skewness affection and kurtosis aversion. Some aggregate estimates of risk parameters are calculated for the typical UK investor. These do not seem well determined, raising issues of the roles of aggregation and wealth in this model.     

The emergence of risk aversion

Economic decision making under uncertainty is universally characterized by aversion to risk. One of the most basic concepts in economic theory, risk aversion is usually explained by the concavity of the utility function, which, in turn, is based on a person's satiability for wealth. I use genetic algorithms to show that risk aversion, and some related consequences, emerge naturally as a result of evolutionary pressures. In analogy to the well-known hillclimbing metaphor, it is helpful in this context to characterize optimizing under uncertainty as “surfing in a fitness seascape.” © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

On cross-risk vulnerability

We introduce the notion of cross-risk vulnerability to generalize the concept of risk vulnerability introduced by Gollier and Pratt [Gollier, C., Pratt, J.W. 1996. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64, 1109–1124]. While risk vulnerability captures the idea that the presence of an unfair financial background risk should make risk-averse individuals behave in a more risk-averse way with respect to an independent financial risk, cross-risk vulnerability extends this idea to the impact of a non-financial background risk on the financial risk. It provides an answer to the question of the impact of a background risk on the optimal coinsurance rate and on the optimal deductible level. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a bivariate utility function to exhibit cross-risk vulnerability both toward an actuarially neutral background risk and toward an unfair background risk. We also analyze the question of the sub-additivity of risk premia and show to what extent cross-risk vulnerability provides an answer.     

Asymptotic analysis for a downside risk minimization problem under partial information

We give an analytic characterization of a large-time “downside risk” probability associated with an investor’s wealth. We assume that risky securities in our market model are affected by “hidden” economic factors, which evolve as a finite-state Markov chain. We formalize and prove a duality relation between downside risk minimization and the related risk-sensitive optimization. The proof is based on an analysis of an ergodic-type Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation with large (exponentially growing) drift.     

Portfolio optimization for wealth-dependent risk preferences

Empirical and theoretical studies of preference structures of investors have long shown that personal and corporate utility is typically multimodal, implying that the same investor can be risk-averse at certain levels of wealth while risk-seeking at others. In this paper, we consider the problem of optimizing the portfolio of an investor with an indefinite quadratic utility function. The convex and concave segments of this utility reflect the investor’s attitude towards risk, which changes based on deviations from a fixed goal. Uncertainty is modeled via a finite set of scenarios for the returns of securities. A global optimization approach is developed to solve the proposed nonconvex optimization problem. We present computational results which investigate the effect of short sales and demonstrate that the proposed approach systematically produces portfolios with higher values of skewness than the classical expectation-variance approach.     

Investment under duality risk measure

One index satisfies the duality axiom if one agent, who is uniformly more risk-averse than another, accepts a gamble, the latter accepts any less risky gamble under the index. Aumann and Serrano (2008) show that only one index defined for so-called gambles satisfies the duality and positive homogeneity axioms. We call it a duality index. This paper extends the definition of duality index to all outcomes including all gambles, and considers a portfolio selection problem in a complete market, in which the agent’s target is to minimize the index of the utility of the relative investment outcome. By linking this problem to a series of Merton’s optimum consumption-like problems, the optimal solution is explicitly derived. It is shown that if the prior benchmark level is too high (which can be verified), then the investment risk will be beyond any agent’s risk tolerance. If the benchmark level is reasonable, then the optimal solution will be the same as that of one of the Merton’s series problems, but with a particular value of absolute risk aversion, which is given by an explicit algebraic equation as a part of the optimal solution. According to our result, it is riskier to achieve the same surplus profit in a stable market than in a less-stable market, which is consistent with the common financial intuition.