Reactivity of methacrylates in anionic copolymerization with methyl methacrylate by n-BuLi

Monomer reactivity ratios, r₁ and r₂ were determined in the anionic copolymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA, M₁) with ethyl (EtMA), isopropyl (i-PrMA), tert-butyl (t-BuMA), benzyl (BzMA), α-methylbenzyl (MBMA), diphenylmethyl (DPMMA), α,α-dimethylbenzyl (DMBMA), and trityl (TrMA) methacrylates (M₂) by use of n-BuLi as an initiator in toluene and THF at -78°C. The order of the reactivity of the monomers towards MMA anion was DPMMA > BzMA > MMA > EtMA > MBMA > i-PrMA > t-BuMA > TrMA > DMBMA in toluene and TrMA > BzMA > MMA > DPMMA > EtMA > MBMA > i-PrMA > DMBMA > t-BuMA in THF. Except for the extremely low reactivity of TrMA and DPMMA in toluene due to steric hindrance, the order was explained in terms of the polar effect of the ester groups. A linear relationship was found between log (1/r₁) and Taft's σ* values of the ester groups, where the ρ* value was 1.1. The plots of log (1/r₁) vs. the ¹H_a (cis to the carbonyl) and ¹³C_ß chemical shifts of the monomers were also on straight lines. The polymer obtained in the copolymerization of MMA with TrMA in toluene by n-BuLi at -78°C was a mixture of poly-MMA and a copolymer, suggesting that there exist two kinds of growing centers.     

Copolymerization of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate

Copolymers of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, (SEM) were prepared with ethyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, vinylidene chloride, and styrene in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution with N,N′-azobisisobutyronitrile as initiator. The monomer reactivity ratios with SEM (M₁) were: vinylidene chloride, r₁ = 3.6 ± 0.5, r₂ = 0.22 ± 0.03; ethyl acrylate, r₁ = 3.2 ± 0.6, r₂ = 0.30 ± 0.05; ethyl methacrylate, r₁ = 2.0 ± 0.4, r₂ = 1.0 ± 0.1; styrene, r₁ = 0.6 ± 0.2, r₂ = 0.37 ± 0.03. The values of the copolymerization parameters calculated from the monomer reactivity ratios were e = +0.6 and Q = 1.4. Comparison of the monomer reactivities indicates that SEM is similar to ethyl methacrylate with regard to copolymerization reactivity in 1,2-dimethoxyethane solution. The sodium salt of 2-sulfoethyl methacrylate, SEM^?Na^⊕, was copolymerized with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (M₂) in water solution. Reactivity ratios of r₁ = 0.7 ± 0.1 and r₂ = 1.6 ± 0.1 were obtained, indicating a lower reactivity of SEM^?Na^⊕ in water as compared to SEM in 1,2-dimethoxyethane. This decreased reactivity was attributed to greater ionic repulsion between reacting species in the aqueous medium.     

Comparative recalculation of the monomer reactivity ratios in copolymerization for styrene and methyl methacrylate

The monomer reactivity ratios (MMRs) in radical copolymerization for styrene and methyl methacrylate were recalculated by five different methods using literature copolymerization data. The use of approximate 95% confidence limits and their visual inspection helps to separate possibly biased copolymer composition data. The recalculated mean MRR values were r₁ (styrene) = 0.501 ± 0.031 and r₂ = 0.472 ± 0.031. The results of the linear least-squares calculation procedures seldom approach the quality of the nonlinear least-squares analysis according to the method of Tidwell and Mortimer.     

Synthesis of Graft Polymers by Copolymerization of Macromonomers. II. Copolymerization Kinetics of Styrene-and Methacrylate-Terminatedpoly(2-Acetoxyethyl Methacrylate) Macromonomers

Styrene-terminated poly(2-acetoxyethyl methacrylate) macromonomer (EBA), methacrylate-terminated poly(2-acetoxyethyl methacrylate) macromonomer (MPA), and methacrylate-terminated poly(methyl methacrylate) macromonomer (MPM) were synthesized and subjected to polymerization and copolymerization by a free-radical polymerization initiator (AIBN). EBA and MPA were homopolymerized at various concentrations. EBA exhibited higher reactivity than styrene. The reactivity of MPA, however, was almost equal to that of glycidyl methacrylate. Cumulative copolymer compositions were determined by GPC analysis of copolymerization products. The reactivity ratios estimated were r_a = 0.95 and r_b , = 0.90 for EBA macromonomer (a)-methyl methacrylate (b) copolymerization. These values were not consistent with literature values for the styrene-methyl methacrylate and p-methoxy-styrene-methyl methacrylate systems. The reactivity ratios estimated for MPA and 2-bromoethyl methacrylate were r_a - 0.95 and r_b , = 0.98; equal to the glycidyl methacrylate-2-bromoethyl methacrylate system. MPA or MPM was also copolymerized with styrene, and the reactivity ratios were r_a = 0.40, r_a = 0.60 and r_a = 0.39, r_a = 0.58, respectively. These estimates were in good agreement with the reactivity ratios for glycidyl methacrylate and styrene. Thus, no effect of molecular weight was observed for both copolymerization systems.     

Quantifying and Controlling the Composition and ‘Randomness’ Distributions of Random Copolymers

The effect of disparity in the reactivity ratios of monomer pairs on the composition distribution and microstructure of the resultant copolymer formed through free‐radical polymerization is quantified computationally. This correlation has been determined for the monomer pairs of styrene/methyl methacrylate and styrene/2‐vinyl pyridine for a variety of monomer feed ratios. These monomer pairs were chosen as they represent systems that have been utilized to experimentally examine the importance of copolymer architecture on its ability to compatibilize an immiscible polymer blend. Moreover, their respective random copolymers show conflicting results for this examination. The results of this work show that the difference in the reactivity ratios of styrene and 2‐vinyl pyridine copolymer (r₁ = 0.5, r₂ = 1.3) significantly broadens the composition and randomness distribution of the resultant copolymer. This breadth is not easily avoided as it evolves even in the early stages of the copolymerization. Conversely, for the styrene/methyl methacrylate pair, the reactivity ratios are similar (r₁ = 0.46, r₂ = 0.52) and this results in a copolymer with a narrow composition distribution and sequence distribution dispersion. Stopping the polymerization at early conversion further narrows both distributions. The presented results, therefore, provide fundamental information that must be considered when planning an experimental procedure to evaluate the relative importance of sequence distribution and composition distribution of a random on its application.     

Helix‐sense‐selective copolymerization of triphenylmethyl methacrylate with chiral 2‐isopropenyl‐4‐phenyl‐2‐oxazoline

The asymmetric induction leading to a one‐handed helix was investigated in the anionic and radical copolymerization of triphenylmethyl methacrylate (TrMA) and (S)‐2‐isopropenyl‐4‐phenyl‐2‐oxazoline ((S)‐IPO), and highly isotactic copolymers with a reasonable optical activity were obtained. In the anionic copolymerization, the optical activity of the obtained copolymers depended on the polarity of solvents, and a highly optically active copolymer was produced in the copolymerization in toluene. The chiral oxazoline monomer functioned not only as a comonomer but also as a chiral ligand to endow the polymer with large negative optical rotation in the copolymerization with TrMA. The copolymers with small positive optical rotation were obtained in THF, indicating that IPO unit may work only as the chiral monomer that dictates the helical sense via copolymerization with TrMA. The isotacticity of the obtained copolymers depended on the contents of TrMA units in the copolymers, but was almost independent of the solvent for copolymerization. In the radical copolymerization, the obtained copolymers exhibited small optical activities. It seemed that the chiral monomer cannot induce one‐handed helical structure of TrMA sequences even if the sequences probably have a high isotacticity. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2019 , 57, 441–447     

Synthesis of Graft Polymers by Copolymerization of Macromonomer. III. Preparation and Copolymerization of Styrene-Terminated Poly(Oxyethylene) Macromonomer

Styrene-terminated poly(oxyethylene) macromonomers (SOE) with narrow molecular weight distribution and quantitative styrene monofunc-tionality were synthesized. In homopolymerization of SOE, conversion of monomer to polymer was shown to be low in spite of high consumption of the vinyl groups of the SOE molecules. Free-radical copolymer-ization of the macromonomer with methyl methacrylate and styrene occurred smoothly, as opposed to homopolymerization. Cumulative copolymer composition and total conversion were determined from the conversions of macromonomer and comonomer (by weight changes) and by proton NMR of the copolymer. The monomer reactivity ratios were found to be r_a = 0.06 and r_b = 2.0 for the copolymerization of SOE macromonomer (a) with methyl methacrylate (b). In this case the macromonomer exhibited considerably lower reactivity than predicted from its low molecular weight model compound. The monomer reactivity ratios estimated for SOE and styrene were r_a = 0.86 and r_b = 1.20. The reactivity of SOE was comparable to, but somewhat lower than, styrene. The graft copolymers were used as activators in the halogen displacement reaction, and it was found that their catalytic activity depends on copolymer composition and chemical structure.     

Copolymerization of ethyl α-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate with maleimide and characterization of the resulting copolymer

Copolymerization of maleimide (MI) and ethyl α-(hydroxymethyl)acrylate (EHMA) was performed at 60°C with AIBN as the initiator in THF. The monomer reactivity ratios were determined as r₁ (MI) = 0.13 and r₂ (EHMA) = 2.20. As the molar fraction of MI in the monomer feed increased, the initial rate of copolymerization decreased. TGA diagrams suggested the crosslinking reaction of the copolymer on heating. DSC and WAXD results suggested the existence of incomplete crystallinity in the copolymer. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 36: 1291–1299, 1998     

Emulsion copolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate

Chain transfer constants to monomer have been measured by an emulsion copolymerization technique at 44°C. The monomer transfer constant (ratio of transfer to propagation rate constants) is 1.9 × 10^?5 for styrene polymerization and 0.4 × 10^?5 for the methyl methacrylate reaction. Cross-transfer reactions are important in this system; the sum of the cross-transfer constants is 5.8 × 10^?5. Reactivity ratios measured in emulsion were r₁ (styrene) = 0.44, r₂ = 0.46. Those in bulk polymerizations were r₁ = 0.45, r₂ = 0.48. These sets of values are not significantly different. Monomer feed compcsition in the polymerizing particles is the same as in the monomer droplets in emulsion copolymerization, despite the higher water solubility of methyl methacrylate. The equilibrium monomer concentration in the particles in interval-2 emulsion polymerization was constant and independent of monomer feed composition for feeds containing 0.25–1.0 mole fraction styrene. Radical concentration is estimated to go through a minimum with increasing methyl methacrylate content in the feed. Rates of copolymerization can be calculated a priori when the concentrations of monomers in the polymer particles are known.     

Photosensitized copolymerization of optically active N-l-menthylmaleimide with styrene and methyl methacrylate

Photosensitized copolymerization of optically active N-l-menthylmaleimide (NMMI) with styrene (Sty) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) was carried out in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 30°C with benzoyl peroxide (BPO). The monomer reactivity ratios for the copolymerization of NMMI (M₂) with Sty (M₁) and MMA (M₁) were r₁ = 0.08 ± 0.10, r₂ = 0.20 ± 0.05 and r₁ = 2.85 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.07 ± 0.06, respectively. Copoly-MMA–NMMI and poly-NMMI showed positive circular dichroism(CD) curves of equal intensity and shape over the wavelength region from 230 to 270 nm; copoly-Sty–NMMI also showed a positive CD curve which was similar in shape but was different in intensity from that of poly-NMMI. The correlation between monomer unit ellipticity of the copolymers and their composition would suggest the alternating and stereoregular copolymerization of NMMI with Sty.     

Organotin polymers—VIII. Binary and ternary copolymerizations of triphenyltin methacrylate with arylonitrile,styrene, N-vinyl pyrrolidone and n-butyl methacrylate

Copolymerizations involving triphenyltin methacrylate (PTMA) were carried out in solution at 70° in the presence of a free radical initiator; the copolymer compositions were determined from tin analyses. The monomer reactivity ratios for the copolymerizations of PTMA with acrylonitrile, styrene, and N-vinyl pyrrolidone were: r₁ = 0.69, r₂ = 0.16; r₁ = 0.76, r₂ = 0.47, and r₁ = 1.22, r₂ = 0.36, respectively. The sequence distribution of the alternation diads for the systems were calculated at various feed compositions. Ternary copolymerization of PTMA-acrylonitrile-butyl methacrylate was studied; the variation of terpolymer composition with conversion fit satisfactorily the experimental results. Ternary azeotropy for PTMA-acrylonitrile-styrene system was verified experimentally.     

Organotin polymers—I. Copolymerization parameters of tributyltin methacrylate with methyl methacrylate,propyl methacrylate and butyl methacrylate

The monomer reactivity ratios for radical copolymerizations of tributyltin methacrylate (monomer-1) with methyl methacrylate, propyl methacrylate and butyl methacrylate have been found as r₁ = 0.79 and r₂ = 1.0, r₁ = 0.58 and r₂ = 0.9, and r₁ = 0.65 and r₂ = 0.68 respectively.     

Novel acrylic macromonomer with amphiphilic character derived from Triton X‐100: Radical copolymerization with methyl methacrylate and thermal properties

This article explores the synthesis of a novel methacrylic macromonomer with an amphiphilic character derived from poly(ethylene glycol) tert‐octylphenyl ether (MT) and its respective homopolymer. To know their reactivity in radical copolymerization reactions with methyl methacrylate (MMA), a model monomer (MTm) was synthesized to determine the reactivity ratios and compare them with the low molar fractions of copolymers of MT with MMA because they were difficult to isolate. They were r_MTm = 0.97 and r_MMA = 0.95. The compositional diagrams when representing the weight fraction of MT and MTm in the feed and the copolymer suggested that a clear correlation exists between the experimental points of the model monomer MTm and the macromonomer MT ones, suggesting that the length of the side poly(ethylene oxide) chain does not affect the reactivity of the methacrylic double bond in the prepared monomers for this type of polymerization reaction. The reactivity ratios of the copolymers have a tendency for the formation of random or Bernoullian copolymers. The glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) of the prepared copolymers were determined by differential scanning calorimetry, deviated from the Fox equation, and discussed on the basis of treatments that consider the influence of the monomeric units along the copolymer chains, determining the T_g of the corresponding alternating dyads. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 1641–1649, 2003     

COPOLYMERIZATION PROCESS OF TRIPHENYLMETHYL METHACRYLATE AND MMA WITH CHIRAL ANIONIC COMPLEX INITIATOR

The copolymerization process of triphenylmethyl methacrylate (TrMA) and methylmethacrylate (MMA) using chiral anionic complex initiator (-) SP-FlLi (Scheme 1) has beenstudied in toluene and THF, respectively. The copolymer obtained in toluene possessed muchhigher specific rotation than that in THF. These copolymers have shown a tendency to a random and a like alternating structure, respectively.     

Copolymerization of glycidyl methacrylate with alkyl acrylate monomers

A newer approach to obtaining acrylic thermoset polymers with adequate hydrophilicity required for various specific end uses is reported. Glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was copolymerized with n-butyl acrylate (n-BA), isobutyl acrylate (i-BA), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2-EHA) in bulk at 60°C. with benzoyl peroxide as free radical initiator. The copolymer composition was determined from the estimation of epoxy group. Reactivity ratios were calculated by the Yezrielev, Brokhina, and Roskin method. For copolymerization of GMA (M₁) with n-BA (M₂) the reactivity ratios were r₁ = 2.15 ± 0.14, r₂ = 0.12 ± 0.03; with i-BA (M₂) they were r₁ = 1.27 ± 0.06, r₂ = 0.33 ± 0.031; and with 2-EHA (M₂) they were r₁ = 2.32 ± 0.14, r₂ = 0.13 ± 0.009. The reactivity ratios were the measure of distribution of monomer units in a copolymer chain; the values obtained are compared and discussed.     

Copolymerization of 2-Hydtoxypropyl Methacrylate with Alkyl Methacrylates

2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2 HPMA) has been copolym-erized with ethyl methacrylate (EMA), n-butyl methacrylate (BMA), and 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) in bulk at 60°C using benzoyl peroxide as initiator. The copolymer composition has been determined from the hydroxyl content. The reactivity ratios have been calculated by the YBR method. For copolymerization of 2-HPMA (M₁) with EMA (M₂), the reactivity ratios are: r₁=1.807 ± 0.032, r₂=0.245 ± 0.021; with BMA (M₂) they are r₁=2.378 ± 0.001, r₂=0.19 ± 0.01; and with EHMA the values are r₁=4.370 ± 0.048, r₂=0.103 ± 0.006. Since the reactivity ratios are the measure of distribution of monomer units in a copolymer chain, the values obtained are compared and discussed. This enables us to choose a suitable copolymer for synthesizing thermoset acrylic polymers, which are obtained from cross-linking of hydroxy functional groups of HPMA units, for specific end uses.     

Low- and high-conversion studies of the free radical copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate with styrene in N,N′-dimethylformamide solution

2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and styrene (S) have been copolymerized in a 3 mol · L⁻¹N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution using 2,2′azobis (isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) as an initiator over a wide composition and conversion range. From low-conversion experiments and ¹H-NMR analysis, the monomer reactivity ratios were determined according to the Mayo–Lewis terminal model. The comparison of the obtained results with those previously reported for copolymerization in bulk and in toluene reveals a relatively small but noticeable solvent effect that can be qualitatively explained by the bootstrap model. Cumulative copolymer composition as a function of conversion is satisfactorily described by the integrated Mayo–Lewis equation; overall copolymerization rate increases with increasing the HEMA/S ratio, and individual monomer conversion is closely related to the monomer molar fraction in the feed. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 2941–2948, 1999     

Copolymerization of Tri-n-butyltin Acrylate and Tri-n-butyltin Methacrylate Monomers with Vinyl Monomers Containing Functional Groups

A new approach to obtaining thermoset organotin polymers, which permits control of crosslinking site distribution and, through it, a better control of properties of organotin antifouling polymers, is reported. Tri-n-butyltin acrylate and tri-n-butyltin methacrylate monomers were prepared and copolymerized, by the solution polymerization method with the use of free-radical initiators, with several vinyl monomers containing either an epoxy or a hydroxyl functional group. The reactivity ratios were determined for six pairs of monomers by using the analytical YBR method to solve the differential form of the copolymer equation. For copolymerization of tri-n-butyltin acrylate (M₁) with glycidyl acrylate (M₂), these reactivity ratios were n = 0.295 ± 0.053, r₂ = 1.409 ± 0.103; with glycidyl methacrylate (M₂) they were r₁ = 0.344 ± 0.201, r₂ = 4.290 ± 0.273; and with N-methylolacrylamide (M₂) they were r₁ = 0.977 ± 0.087, r₂ = 1.258 ± 0.038. Similarly, for the copolymerization of tri-n-butyltin methacrylate (Mi) with glycidyl aery late (M₂) these reactivity ratios were r₁ = 1.356 ± 0.157, r₂ = 0.367 ± 0.086; with glycidyl methacrylate (M₂) they were r₁ = 0.754 ± 0.128, r₂ = 0.794 ± 0.135; and with N-methylolacrylamide (M₂) they were r₁ ?4.230 ± 0.658, r₂ = 0.381 ± 0.074. Even though the magnitude of error in determination of reactivity ratios was small, it was not found possible to assign consistent Q,e values to either of the organotin monomers for all of its copolymerizations. Therefore, Q,e values were obtained by averaging all Q,e values found for the particular monomer, and these were Q = 0.852, e = 0.197 for the tri-n-butyltin methacrylate monomer; and Q = 0.235, e = 0.401 for the tri-n-butyltin acrylate monomer. Since the reactivity ratios indicate the distribution of the units of a particular monomer in the polymer chain, the measured values are discussed in relation to the selection of a suitable copolymer which, when cross-linked with appropriate crosslinking agents through functional groups, would give thermoset organotin coatings with an optimal balance of mechanical and antifouling properties.     

Solution copolymerization of styrene and 2-hydroxyethyl mechacrylate.

The rate of solution copolymerization of styrene (M₁) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (M₂) was investigated by dilatometry. N,N-dimethyl formamide, toluene, isopropyl alcohol, and butyl alcohol were used as solvents. Polymerization was initiated by α,α′-azobisisobutyronitrile at 60°C. The initial copolymerization rate increased nonlinearly with increasing 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)/styrene ratio. The copolymerization rate was promoted by solvents containing hydroxyl groups. Two different approaches were used for the prediction of copolymerization rates. The relationships proposed for the copolymerization rates calculation involve the effects of the total monomer concentration, mole fraction of HEMA, and of the solvent type. Different reactivity ratios were found in polar and nonpolar solvents: r₁ = 0.53, r₂ = 0.59 in N,N-dimethyl formamide, isopropyl alcohol and n-butyl alcohol; r₁ = 0.50, r₂ = 1.65 in toluene. The usability of these reactivity ratios was confirmed by batch experiments.