Hereditary normality-type properties of hyperspaces

Let X be a Hausdorff topological space and exp(X) be the space of all (nonempty) closed subsets of a space X with the Vietoris topology. We consider hereditary normality-type properties of exp(X). In particular, we prove that if exp(X) is hereditarily D-normal, then X is a metrizable compact space.     

On sequentially compact T2 compactifications

It is known that a compact space can fail to be sequentially compact. In this paper we consider the following problem: when does a space admit a sequentially compact T₂ compactification? In the first section we develop a method to produce such compactifications, and we apply it in the second section to study the question using coverings.Moreover, we obtain solutions for locally compact T₂ spaces, and for metrizable spaces.     

On continuous extensions

We consider various possiblities concerning the continuous extension of continuous functions taking values in an ultrametric space. In Section 1 we consider Tietze-type exetension theorems concerning continuous extendibility of continuous functions from compact and closed subsets to the whole space. In Sections 2 and 3 we consider extending separated continous functions in such a way that, certain continuous extensions remain separated. Functgions taking values in a complete ultravalued field are dealt with in Section 2, and the real and complex cases in Section 3.     

Products of monotonically normal spaces with factors defined by topological games

Recently, it has been proved that orthocompactness implies normality for the products of a monotonically normal space and a compact space. It had been known that normality, collectionwise normality and the shrinking property are equivalent for the same products. We extend these two results for the products replacing the compact factor with a factor defined by topological games. Moreover, we prove the equivalence of orthocompactness and weak suborthocompactness in these products.     

Realcompactness of hyperspaces and extensions of open-closed maps

In response to questions of Ginsburg [9, 10], we prove that if cf(c)>ω₁, then there exists an open-closed, continuous map f from a normal, realcompact space X onto a space Y which is not realcompact. By his result the hyperspace 2^x of closed subsets of X is then not realcompact, and the extension μf(vf) of f to the topological completion (the Hewitt realcompactification) of X is not onto. The latter fact solves problems raised by Morita [16] and by Isiwata [12] both negatively. We also consider the problem whether or not the hyperspace of a hereditarily Lindelöf space is hereditarily realcompact.     

On some questions about KC and related spaces

Answering questions raised by O.T. Alas and R.G. Wilson, or by these two authors together with M.G. Tkachenko and V.V. Tkachuk, we show that every minimal SC space must be sequentially compact, and we produce the following examples:

-

a KC space which cannot be embedded in any compact KC space;

-

a countable KC space which does not admit any coarser compact KC topology;

-

a minimal Hausdorff space which is not a k-space.

We also give an example of a compact KC space such that every nonempty open subset of it is dense, even if, as pointed out to us by the referee, a completely different construction carried out by E.K. van Douwen in 1993 leads to a space with the same properties.     

A compactification problem of J. De Groot

Recently, De Groot's conjecture that cmp X = def X holds for every separable and metrizable space X has been negatively resolved by Pol. In previous efforts to resolve De Groot's conjecture various functions like cmp have been introduced. A new inequality between two of these functions is established. Many examples which have been constructed so far in relation with the conjecture are obtained by attaching a locally compact space to a compact space. An upper bound for the compactness deficiency def of the resulting space is given.     

Weak separation axioms and weak covering properties

We identify some remnants of normality and call them rudimentary normality, generalize the concept of submetacompact spaces to that of a weakly subparacompact space and that of a weakly^? subparacompact space, and make a simultaneous generalization of collectionwise normality and screenability with the introduction of what is to be called collectionwise σ-normality. With these weak properties, we show that,1) on weakly subparacompact spaces, countable compactness = compactness, ω₁-compactness = Lindelöfness;2) on weakly subparacompact Hausdorff spaces with rudimentary normality, regularity = normality = countable paracompactness; and3) on weakly subparacompact regular T₁-spaces with rudimentary normality, collectionwise σ-normality = screenability = collectionwise normality = paracompactness.The famous Normal Moore Space Conjecture is thus given an even more striking appearance and Worrell and Wicke?s factorization of paracompactness (over Hausdorff spaces) along with Krajewski?s are combined and strengthened. The methodology extends itself to the factorization of paracompactness on locally compact, locally connected spaces in the manner of Gruenhage and on locally compact spaces in that of Tall, and to the factorization of subparacompactness and metacompactness in the genre of Katuta, Chaber, Junnila and Price and Smith and that of Boone, improving all of them.     

Real dicompactifications of ditopological texture spaces

Real dicompactifications and dicompactifications of a ditopological texture space are defined and studied.Section 2 considers nearly plain extensions of a ditopological texture space (S,S,τ,κ). Spaces that possess a nearly plain extension are shown to have a property, called here almost plainness, that is weaker than that of near plainness, but which shares with near plainness the existence of an associated plain space (Sp,Sp,τp,κp). Some properties of the class of almost plain ditopological texture spaces are established, a notion of canonical nearly plain extension of an almost plain ditopological texture space, projective and injective pre-orderings and the concept of isomorphism on such canonical nearly plain extensions are defined.In Section 3 the notion of nearly plain extension is specialized to that of real dicompactification and dicompactification, and the spaces that have such extensions are characterized. Working in terms of a specific representation of the canonical real dicompactifications and dicompactifications of a completely biregular bi-T₂ almost plain ditopological space, the interrelation between sub-T-lattices of the T-lattice of ω-preserving bicontinuous real mappings on the associated plain space and the real dicompactifications and dicompactifications are investigated. In particular generalizations of the Hewitt realcompactification and Stone-?ech compactification are obtained, and shown to be reflectors for the appropriate categories.     

CARTESIAN CLOSEDNESS,EXPONENTIALITY, AND FINAL HULLS IN PSEUDOTOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Abstract

We show that each non-trivial epireflective subcategory of the topological or pretopological spaces fails to be cartesian closed. Motivated by this “negative” result, we consider the supercategory of pseudotopological spaces and obtain: An epireflective subcategory of the pseudotopological spaces which contains a finite non-indiscrete space is cartesian closed iff it is closed with respect to powers in the pseudotopological spaces. Here the density property that every pseudotopological space is a final epi-sink of free ultraspaces is essential.     

Certain sequences with compact closure

This paper deals with a question which is stated by quite simple definitions. A sequence {xn} in a space X is called a β-sequence if every subsequence of it has a cluster point in X. The closure of the sequence {xn} means the closure of in X. Here we consider the question when a β-sequence has compact closure. We give several answers to this question.     

Subsequential filters

Following N. Noble, we say that a space is subsequential if it is a subspace of a sequential space. A free filter F on ω is called subsequential if the space ω∪{F} is subsequential. In this paper, we state several properties of these filters.     

On open ultrafilters and maximal points

In this work we expand upon the theory of open ultrafilters in the setting of regular spaces. In [E. van Douwen, Remote points, Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 188 (1981) 1-45], van Douwen showed that if X is a non-feebly compact Tychonoff space with a countable π-base, then βX has a remote point. We develop a related result for the class of regular spaces which shows that in a non-feebly compact regular space X with a countable π-base, there exists a free open ultrafilter on X that is also a regular filter.Of central importance is a result of Mooney [D.D. Mooney, H-bounded sets, Topology Proc. 18 (1993) 195-207] that characterizes open ultrafilters as open filters that are saturated and disjoint-prime. Smirnov [J.M. Smirnov, Some relations on the theory of dimensions, Mat. Sb. 29 (1951) 157-172] showed that maximal completely regular filters are disjoint prime, from which it was concluded that βX is a perfect extension for a Tychonoff space X. We extend this result, and other results of Skljarenko [E.G. Skljarenko, Some questions in the theory of bicompactifications, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2 58 (1966) 216-266], by showing that a maximal regular filter on any Hausdorff space is disjoint prime.Open ultrafilters are integral to the study of maximal points and lower topologies in the partial order of Hausdorff topologies on a fixed set. We show that a maximal point in a Hausdorff space cannot have a neighborhood base of feebly compact neighborhoods. One corollary is that no locally countably compact Hausdorff topology is a lower topology, which was shown previously under the additional assumption of countable tightness by Alas and Wilson [O. Alas, R. Wilson, Which topologies can have immediate successors in the lattice of T₁-topologies? Appl. Gen. Topol. 5 (2004) 231-242]. Another is that a maximal point in a feebly compact space is not a regular point. This generalizes results of both Carlson [N. Carlson, Lower upper topologies in the Hausdorff partial order on a fixed set, Topology Appl. 154 (2007) 619-624] and Costantini [C. Costantini, On some questions about posets of topologies on a fixed set, Topology Proc. 32 (2008) 187-225].     

On the product of homogeneous spaces

Within the class of Tychonoff spaces, and within the class of topological groups, most of the natural questions concerning ‘productive closure’ of the subclasses of countably compact and pseudocompact spaces are answered by the following three well-known results: (1) [ZFC] There is a countably compact Tychonoff space X such that X × X is not pseudocompact; (2) [ZFC] The product of any set of pseudocompact topological groups is pseudocompact; and (3) [ZFC+ MA] There are countably compact topological groups G₀, G₁ such that G₀ × G₁ is not countably compact.In this paper we consider the question of ‘productive closure” in the intermediate class of homogeneous spaces. Our principal result, whose proof leans heavily on a simple, elegant result of V.V. Uspenski?, is this: In ZFC there are pseudocompact, homogeneous spaces X₀, X₁ such that X₀ × X₁ is not pseudocompact; if in addition MA is assumed, the spaces X_i may be chosen countably compact.Our construction yields an unexpected corollary in a different direction: Every compact space embeds as a retract in a countably compact, homogeneous space. Thus for every cardinal number α there is a countably compact, homogeneous space whose Souslin number exceeds α.     

On extensions of topological spaces in terms of ideals

In the present paper, a kind of extension, termed ideal extension of a given topological space is considered via the concept of ideals. A general method of construction of such an extension of a T₀—space is worked out and it is finally shown that under certain condition imposed on the ideals involved, the said extension space turns out to be the compactification of a given space.     

Dissipated compacta

The dissipated spaces form a class of compacta which contains both the scattered compacta and the compact LOTSes (linearly ordered topological spaces), and a number of theorems true for these latter two classes are true more generally for the dissipated spaces. For example, every regular Borel measure on a dissipated space is separable.The standard Fedor?uk S-space (constructed under ?) is dissipated. A dissipated compact L-space exists iff there is a Suslin line.A product of two compact LOTSes is usually not dissipated, but it may satisfy a weakening of that property. In fact, the degree of dissipation of a space can be used to distinguish topologically a product of n LOTSes from a product of m LOTSes.     

On order structure of the set of one-point Tychonoff extensions of a locally compact space

If a Tychonoff space X is dense in a Tychonoff space Y, then Y is called a Tychonoff extension of X. Two Tychonoff extensions Y₁ and Y₂ of X are said to be equivalent, if there exists a homeomorphism which keeps X pointwise fixed. This defines an equivalence relation on the class of all Tychonoff extensions of X. We identify those extensions of X which belong to the same equivalence classes. For two Tychonoff extensions Y₁ and Y₂ of X, we write Y₂?Y₁, if there exists a continuous function which keeps X pointwise fixed. This is a partial order on the set of all (equivalence classes of) Tychonoff extensions of X. If a Tychonoff extension Y of X is such that Y\X is a singleton, then Y is called a one-point extension of X. Let T(X) denote the set of all one-point extensions of X. Our purpose is to study the order structure of the partially ordered set (T(X),?). For a locally compact space X, we define an order-anti-isomorphism from T(X) onto the set of all nonempty closed subsets of βX\X. We consider various sets of one-point extensions, including the set of all one-point locally compact extensions of X, the set of all one-point Lindelöf extensions of X, the set of all one-point pseudocompact extensions of X, and the set of all one-point ?ech-complete extensions of X, among others. We study how these sets of one-point extensions are related, and investigate the relation between their order structure, and the topology of subspaces of βX\X. We find some lower bounds for cardinalities of some of these sets of one-point extensions, and in a concluding section, we show how some of our results may be applied to obtain relations between the order structure of certain subfamilies of ideals of C^∗(X), partially ordered with inclusion, and the topology of subspaces of βX\X. We leave some problems open.     

Lower and upper topologies in the Hausdorff partial order on a fixed set

In the partial order of Hausdorff topologies on a fixed infinite set there may exist topologies τ?σ in which there is no Hausdorff topology μ satisfying σ?μ?τ. τ and σ are lower and upper topologies in this partial order, respectively. Alas and Wilson showed that a compact Hausdorff space cannot contain a maximal point and therefore its topology is not lower. We generalize this result by showing that a maximal point in an H-closed space is not a regular point. Furthermore, we construct in ZFC an example of a countably compact, countably tight lower topology, answering a question of Alas and Wilson. Finally, we characterize topologies that are upper in this partial order as simple extension topologies.     

SPACES WITH WALLMAN EQUIVALENT INTERMEDIATE SPACES

Abstract

If every infinite closed subset of the Wallman compactification, WX, of a space X must contain at least one element of X, then for any space Y intermediate between X and WX the Wallman compactification WY is homeomorphic to WX. This extends a property which characterizes normality inducing spaces. In the case where X is not normal, however, this is not a characterization, since there are nonnormal spaces for which all intermediate spaces are Wallman equivalent, but have infinite closed subsets contained in WX/X.     

Some localized separation axioms and their implications

In a topological spaceX, a T₂-distinct pointx means that for anyyX xy, there exist disjoint open neighbourhoods ofx andy. Similarly, T₀-distinct points and T₁distinct points are defined. In a T_i-distinct point-setA, we assume that eachxA is a T _i -distinct point (i=0, 1, 2). In the present paper some implications of these notions which localize the T _i -separation axioms (i=0, 1, 2) requirement, are studied. Suitable variants of regularity and normality in terms of T₂-distinct points are shown hold in a paracompact space (without the assumption of any separation axioms). Later T₀-distinct points are used to give two characterizations of the R _D -axiom.¹ In the end, some simple results are presented including a condition under which an almost compact set is closed and a result regarding two continuous functions from a topological space into a Hausdorff space is sharpened. A result which relates a limit pointv to an -limit point is stated.