[2+4] and [2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions of N‐Sulfinyl Carboxylic Acid Amides with (CF3)2BNMe2. Crystal Structure of cyclo‐(CF3)2B‐NMe2‐S(=O)‐N=C(p‐CH3C6H4)‐O

N‐sulfinylacylamides R‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with (CF₃)₂BNMe₂ ( 1 ) to form, by [2+4] cycloaddition, six‐membered rings cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(R)‐O for R = Me ( 2 ), t‐Bu ( 3 ), C₆H₅ ( 4 ), and p‐CH₃C₆H₄ ( 5 ) while N‐sulfinylcarbamic acid esters R‐O‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with 1 to yield mixtures of six‐membered (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(OR)‐O) and four‐membered rings (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N(C=O)OR) for R = Me ( 6 and 9 ), Et ( 7 and 10 ), and C₆H₅ ( 8 and 11 ). The structure of 5 has been determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Bildung und Struktur des [{cyclo‐P4(PtBu2)4}{Ni(CO)2}2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXVI. Formation and Structure of [{ cyclo ‐P₄(P^tBu₂)₄}{Ni(CO)₂}₂] [{cyclo‐P₄(P^tBu₂)₄}{Ni(CO)₂}₂] is formed by reaction of the cyclotetraphosphane P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ with [Ni(CO)₄]. Each Ni(CO)₂ unit is coordinated by two adjacent ^tBu₂P groups forming two five‐membered P₄Ni rings above and below the planar cyclotetraphosphane ring, respectively. The compound crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 (No. 2) with a = 893.29(5), b = 1140.75(7), c = 1235.52(8) pm, α = 109.179(7), β = 100.066(7), γ = 97.595(7)° and Z = 1.     

Hexakis(2,4,6‐triisopropylphenyl)cyclotristannoxane – a Molecular Diorganotin Oxide with Kinetically Inert Sn–O Bonds

The single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis of hexakis(2,4,6‐triisopropylphenyl)cyclotristannoxane, cyclo‐[(2,4,6‐i‐Pr₃‐C₆H₂)₂SnO]₃ ( 1 ), is reported and reveals this compound to contain an almost planar six‐membered ring. Redistribution reactions of 1 with cyclo‐(t‐Bu₂SnO)₃ and t‐Bu₂SiCl₂, respectively, failed and indicate an unusual kinetic inertness of the Sn–O bonds in 1 as compared to related molecular diorganotin oxides containing less bulkier substituents. The redistribution reaction of cyclo‐(t‐Bu₂SnO)₃ with cyclo‐(t‐Bu₂SnS)₂ leads to an equilibrium involving the trimeric diorganotin oxysulphides cyclo‐t‐Bu₂Sn(OSnt‐Bu₂)₂S ( 2 a ) and cyclo‐t‐Bu₂Sn(SSnt‐Bu₂)₂O ( 2 b ).     

Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXV. Bildung und Struktur des [{cyclo‐P3(PtBu2)3}{Ni(CO)2}{Ni(CO)3}]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXV. Formation and Structure of [{ cyclo ‐P₃(P^tBu₂)₃}{Ni(CO)₂}{Ni(CO)₃}] ^tBu₂P–P=P(R)^tBu₂ (R = Br, Me) reacts with [Ni(CO)₄] yielding [{cyclo‐P₃(P^tBu₂)₃}{Ni(CO)₂}{Ni(CO)₃}]. The two cis‐^tBu₂P substituents of the cyclotriphosphane, which results from the trimerization of the phosphinophosphinidene ^tBu₂P–P, are coordinating to a Ni(CO)₂ unit forming a five‐membered P₄Ni chelate ring. The trans‐^tBu₂P group is linked to a Ni(CO)₃ unit. The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca (No. 61) with a = 933.30(5), b = 2353.2(1) and c = 3474.7(3) pm.     

Donor‐unsupported Phosphanylmethanides Li[CH2PR2] (R = tBu,Ph) – Crystal Structure of Li[CH2PtBu2] Solved by XRPD and DFT‐D Calculations

The solvent‐free methyllithium derivatives Li[CH₂PR₂] (R = tBu, Ph) were prepared via the reaction of CH₃PR₂ with Li[tBu]. It should be noted that the deprotonation of CH₃PtBu₂ with Li[tBu] occurred at 60 °C, whereas Li[CH₂PPh₂] was already formed from CH₃PPh₂ with Li[tBu] at ambient temperature. The structure determination of di‐tert‐butylphosphanylmethyllithium was performed by high resolution X‐ray powder diffraction analysis at different temperatures. This led to two possible structure solutions with similar quality criteria (space groups Iba2 and I2/a). Therefore CASTEP DFT‐D calculations were applied to verify the correct crystal structure. The solid‐state structure of di‐tert‐butylphosphanylmethyllithium consists of alternating edge‐sharing six‐ and four‐membered rings, which form a polymeric, infinite double‐chain along the crystallographic c axis in the monoclinic space group I2/a. Two Li[CH₂PtBu₂] units connected via an inversion center form a six‐membered Li₂C₂P₂ ring in the chair conformation. The nearly flat four‐membered Li₂C₂ ring, is oriented perpendicularly to the twofold axis.     

Zur Reaktivität des Ferriophosphaalkens (Z)‐[Cp*(CO)2FeP=C(tBu)NMe2] gegenüber Propiolsäureestern HC≡C‐CO2R (R=Me,Et) und Acetylendicarbonsäureestern RO2C‐C≡C‐CO2R (R=Me,Et, tBu)

On the Reactivity of the Ferriophosphaalkene (Z)‐[Cp*(CO)₂Fe‐P=C(tBu)NMe₂] towards Propiolates HC≡C‐CO₂R (R=Me, Et) and Acetylene Dicarboxylates RO ₂C‐C≡C‐CO₂R (R=Me, Et, tBu) The reaction of equimolar amounts of (Z)‐[Cp*(CO)₂Fe‐P=C(tBu)NMe₂] 3 and methyl‐ and ethyl‐propiolate ( 2a, b ) or of 3 and dialkyl acetylene dicarboxylates 1a (R=Me), 1b (Et), 1c (tBu) afforded the five‐membered metallaheterocycles [Cp*(CO) =C(tBu)NMe₂] ( 4a, b ) and [Cp*(CO) =C(tBu)NMe₂] ( 5a—c ). The molecular structures of 4b and 5a were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses. Moreover, the reactivity of 4b towards ethereal HBF₄ was investigated.     

LSn(OCH2CH2)2NR (L = lone pair,W(CO)5; R = Me,t‐Bu). The Molecular Structures of 5‐Aza‐2,8‐dioxa‐1‐stannabicyclo[3.3.0]1.5octanes and Their Tungstenpentacarbonyl Complexes

Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses of LSn(OCH₂CH₂)₂NR [ 1 , R = Me, L = lone pair; 2 , R = Me, L = W(CO)₅; 3 , R = t‐Bu, L = W(CO)₅] reveal these compounds to be dimeric and cis‐configurated. The dimerization is realized by intramolecular O→Sn interactions to give four‐membered Sn₂O₂‐rings. In addition, there are intramolecular N→Sn interactions ranging in between 2.356(5) ( 2 ) and 2.549(4) Å ( 3 ).     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von tBu‐substituierten Disiloxanen des Typus tBu2SiX‐O‐SiYtBu2 (X = Y = OH,Br; X = OH,Y = H) und den Addukten tBu3SiOH·(HO3SCF3)0.5·H2O und tBu3SiOLi·(LiO3SCF3)2·(H2O)2

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of tBu‐substituted Disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = OH, Br; X = OH, Y = H) and of the Adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = H, OH) are accessible from the reaction of CF₃SO₂Cl with tBu₂SiHOH or tBu₂Si(OH)₂. By this reaction the disiloxane tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ is formed together with tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiOHtBu₂. The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = Cl, Br) can be synthesized almost quantitatively from tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ with Cl₂ and Br₂ in CH₂Cl₂. The structures of the disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = H, Y = OH; X = Y = OH, Br) show almost linear Si‐O‐Si units with short Si‐O bonds. Single crystals of the adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ have been obtained from the reaction of tBu₃SiOH with CF₃SO₃H and of tBu₃SiO₃SCF₃ with LiOH. According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis (hexagonal, P‐62c), tBu₃SiOLi · (LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ features the ion pair [(tBu₃SiOLi)₂(LiO₃SCF₃)₃(H₂O)₃Li]⁺ [CF₃SO₃]^?. The central framework of the cation forms a trigonal Li₆ prism.     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXII. Die Bildung von [η2‐{tBu–P=P–SiMe3}Pt(PR3)2]aus (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(Me)tBu2 und [η2‐{C2H4}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXII. The Formation of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂] from (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ and [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P = P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂]. However, there is no indication for an isomer which would be the analogue to the well known [η²‐{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂]. The syntheses and NMR data of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PMe₃)₂] as well as the results of the single crystal structure determination of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] are reported.     

Reactions of Tri‐tert‐butylazadiboriridine NB2R3 with Carbonyl and Similar Species

The carbonyl group of X(R')CO is added to the B—B bond of the three‐membered ring compound NB₂R₃ ( 1 ; R = tBu) to give the five‐membered rings [—BR—NR—BR—X(Rapos;)C—O—] ( 2a — d ; Rapos;/X = tBu/H, Ph/Ph, H/OMe, H/NMe₂). The tetraazoniatetraboratatricyclo[6.2.0.0^{3, 6}]deca‐2, 4, 7, 9‐tetraenes N₄B₄C₂R₆Rapos;₂ ( 4a , b ; Rapos; = Me, Et), known products from the reaction of 1 with isonitriles CNRapos;, undergo a rearrangement to give the corresponding deca‐1, 4, 6, 9‐tetraenes 6a , b by the migration of two tBu groups from boron to carbon on photolysis; the structure of 6a is confirmed by X‐ray analysis. The reaction of CO, generated from carbonylmetal complexes (photolytically from [Cr(CO)₆] or [Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄]; thermally from [Fe₂(CO)₉] or [Co₂(CO)₈]), with 1 gives the 3, 7‐dioxonia‐1, 5‐diazonia‐2, 4, 6, 8‐tetraboratanaphtalene O₂N₂C₂B₄R₆ ( 7 ), as has been known from the reaction of [Fe(CO)₅] and 1 . The product 7 is also obtained from the isomeric dispiro compound 5 , the known product from the reaction of 1 with gaseous CO at —78 °C, by standing in solution at room temperature. Surprisingly, the reaction of 1 with CO from the photolysis of [CpMn(CO)₃] gives a naphthalene‐type isomer of 7 , the 1, 5‐dioxonia‐3, 7‐diazonia species 8 , the crystal structure of which is reported.     

Synthese und Eigenschaften der Di‐tert‐butylphosphide [M(PtBu2)2]2 (M = Zn,Hg) und [Cu(PtBu2)]4

Syntheses and Properties of Di‐tert‐butylphosphides [M(PtBu₂)₂]₂ (M = Zn, Hg) and [Cu(PtBu₂)]₄ The phosphides [M(PtBu₂)₂]₂ (M = Zn, Hg) and [Cu(PtBu₂)]₄ are accessible from reaction of LiPtBu₂ with ZnI₂, HgCl₂ and CuCl, respectively. [M(PtBu₂)₂]₂ (M = Zn, Hg) are dimers in the solid state. X‐ray structural analyses of these phosphides reveal that [M(PtBu₂)₂]₂ (M = Zn, Hg) contain four‐membered M₂P₂‐rings whereas [Cu(PtBu₂)]₄ features a planar eight‐membered Cu₄P₄‐ring. Degradation reaction of LiPtBu₂(BH₃) in the presence of HgCl₂ results in the dimeric phosphanylborane BH₃ adduct [tBu₂PBH₂(BH₃)]₂. X‐ray quality crystals of [tBu₂PBH₂(BH₃)]₂ (monoclinic, P2₁/n) are obtained from a pentane solution at 6 °C. According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis, the O₂‐oxidation product of [Hg(PtBu₂)₂]₂, [Hg{OP(O)(tBu)OPtBu₂}(μ‐OPtBu)]₂, features in the solid state structure two five‐membered HgP₂O₂‐rings and a six‐membered Hg₂P₂O₂‐ring. Herein the spiro‐connected Hg atoms are member of one five‐membered and of the six‐membered ring.     

P‐Aminophosphaalkenes with C‐Isopropyldimethylsilyl Groups

Amination of the C‐isopropyldimethylsilyl P‐chlorophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PCl ( 1 ) leads to the P‐aminophosphaalkenes (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(R)R′ (R, R′ = Me ( 2 ), R = H, R′ = nPr ( 3 ), R = H, R′ = iPr ( 4 ), R = H, R′ = tBu ( 5 ), R = H, R′ = 1‐Ada ( 6 ), R = H, R′ = CPh₃ ( 7 ), R = H, R′ = Ph ( 8 ), R = H, RR′ = 2,6‐iPr₂Ph (= DIP) ( 10 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐Me₃Ph (= Mes) ( 11 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐tBu₃Ph (= Mes*)] ( 12 ), R = H, R′ = SiMe₃ ( 13 ), and R, R′ = SiMe₂Ph (1 4 ). ³¹P‐NMR spectra confirm that phosphaalkenes 2 – 7 and 10 – 14 are monomeric in solution; the structures of 7 , 10 , and 12 were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Freshly prepared (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(H)Ph ( 8 ) is a monomer that dimerizes with (N→C) proton migration within several hours to the stable diazadiphosphetidine [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CHPNPh]₂ ( 9 ). NMR‐scale reactions of deprotonated 5 and 13 with tBuiPrPCl provide by P–P bond formation the P‐phosphanyl iminophosphoranes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C=](RN=)PPtBu(iPr) [R = tBu ( 15 ), R = Me₃Si ( 17 )]. Deprotonated 5 and Me₃GeCl deliver by N–Ge bond formation the aminophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(tBu)GeMe₃ ( 20 ), which with elemental selenium 5 undergoes (N→C) proton migration to form the alkyl(imino)(seleno)phosphorane [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CH](tBuN=)P=Se ( 21 ), which is a selenium‐bridged cyclic dimer in the solid state.     

Darstellung,Charakterisierung und Struktur funktionalisierter Fluorphosphaalkene des Typs R3E–P=C(F)NEt2 (R/E = Me/Si,Me/Ge,CF3/Ge,Me/Sn)

Preparation, Characterization, and Structure of Functionalized Fluorophosphaalkenes of the Type R₃E–P=C(F)NEt₂ (R/E = Me/Si, Me/Ge, CF₃/Ge, Me/Sn) P‐functionalized 1‐diethylamino‐1‐fluoro‐2‐phosphaalkenes of the type R₃E–P=C(F)NEt₂ [R/E = Me/Si ( 2 ), Me/Ge ( 3 ), CF₃/Ge ( 4 ), Me/Sn ( 5 )] are prepared by reaction of HP=C(F)NEt₂ ( 1 , E/Z = 18/82) with R₃EX (X = I, Cl) in the presence of triethylamine as base, exclusively as Z‐Isomers. 2–5 are thermolabile, so that only the more stable representatives 2 and 4 can be isolated in pure form and fully characterized. 3 and 5 decompose already at temperatures above –10 °C, but are clearly identified by ¹⁹F and ³¹P NMR‐measurements. The Z configuration is established on the basis of typical NMR data, an X‐ray diffraction analysis of 4 and ab initio calculations for E and Z configurations of the model compound Me₃Si–P=C(F)NMe₂. The relatively stable derivative 2 is used as an educt for reactions with pivaloyl‐, adamantoyl‐, and benzoylchloride, respectively, which by cleavage of the Si–P bond yield the push/pull phosphaalkenes RC(O)–P=C(F)NEt₂ [R = tBu ( 6 ), Ad ( 7 ), Ph ( 8 )], in which π‐delocalization with the P=C double bond occurs both with the lone pair on nitrogen and with the carbonyl group.     

An Air‐Stable Heterobimetallic Si2M2 Tetrahedral Cluster

Air‐ and moisture‐stable heterobimetallic tetrahedral clusters [Cp(CO)₂MSiR]₂ (M=Mo or W; R=SitBu₃) were isolated from the reaction of N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) stabilized silyl(silylidene) metal complexes Cp(CO)₂M=Si(SitBu₃)NHC with a mild Lewis acid (BPh₃). Alternatively, treatment of the NHC‐stabilized silylidene complex Cp(CO)₂W=Si(SitBu₃)NHC with stronger Lewis acids such as AlCl₃ or B(C₆F₅)₃ resulted in the reversible coordination of the Lewis acid to one of the carbonyl ligands. Computational investigations revealed that the dimerization of the intermediate metal silylidyne (M≡Si) complex to a tetrahedral cluster instead of a planar four‐membered ring is due to steric bulk.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Synthesis and characterization of aluminum(III) and tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring‐opening polymerization catalysis of ε‐caprolactone

A series of Al(III) and Sn(II) diiminophosphinate complexes have been synthesized. Reaction of Ph(ArCH₂)P(?NBu^t)NHBu^t (Ar = Ph, 3 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 4 ) with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave aluminum complexes [R₂Al{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (R = Me, Ar = Ph, 5 ; R = Me, Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 6 ; R = Et, Ar = Ph, 7 ; R = Et, Ar = quinolyl, 8 ). Lithiated 3 and 4 were treated with SnCl₂ to afford tin(II) complexes [ClSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (Ar = Ph, 9 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 10 ). Complex 9 was converted to [(Me₃Si)₂NSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 11 ) by treatment with LiN(SiMe₃)₂. Complex 11 was also obtained by reaction of 3 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Complex 9 reacted with [LiOC₆H₄Bu^t‐4] to yield [4‐Bu^tC₆H₄OSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 12 ). Compounds 3–12 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of complexes 6 , 10 , and 11 were further characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalytic activity of complexes 5–8 , 11 , and 12 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was studied. In the presence of BzOH, the complexes catalyzed the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐CL in the activity order of 5 > 7 ≈ 8 > 6 ? 11 > 12 , giving polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions. The kinetic studies showed a first‐order dependency on the monomer concentration in each case. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4621–4631, 2006     

Hydroalumination and Hydrogallation Reactions with Tri(ethynyl)silanes – Generation of Compounds with up to Three Coordinatively Unsaturated Aluminium Atoms

Hydroalumination or hydrogallation of tri(ethynyl)silanes, RSi(C≡C‐Ar)₃ ( 1a , R = Ph, Ar = Ph; 1b , R = Me, Ar = Ph; 1c , R = Me, Ar = C₆H₄Me), with the element hydrides H‐EtBu₂ (E = Al, Ga) in stoichiometric ratios of 1:1 to 1:3 at ambient temperature yielded the addition products (PhC≡C)₂(R)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph] ( 2 , R = Ph, E = Ga; 3a , R = Me, E = Al; 3b , R = Me, E = Ga), (PhC≡C)(Me)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph]₂ ( 4a , E = Al, 4b , E = Ga) and (Me)Si[(tBu₂Al)C=C(H)Ar]₃ ( 5 , Ar = Ph; 6 , Ar = C₆H₄Me). Compounds 2 – 4 show a relatively close interaction between the coordinatively unsaturated aluminium or gallium atoms and one of the C_α(≡C) atoms of unreacted alkyne substituents [245 (E = Al) and 266 pm (E = Ga)] that stabilises the kinetically favoured cis addition products with E and hydrogen on the same side of the resulting C=C double bonds. In the absence of these stabilising effects the compounds were found to isomerise to the thermodynamically favoured trans isomers.     

Über Bildung und Reaktionen der CH2Li‐Derivate von tBu2P–P=P(CH3)tBu2 und (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(CH3)tBu2

Formation and Reactions of the CH₂Li‐Derivatives of ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ and (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ With ⁿBuLi, (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 2 ) yield (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 3 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 4 ), wich react with Me₃SiCl to give (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 5 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 6 ), respectively. With ^tBu₂P–P(SiMe₃)–P^tBuCl ( 7 ), compound 3 forms 5 as well as the cyclic products [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(^tBu)–P^tBu] ( 8 ) and [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(P^tBu₂)–P(^tBu)] ( 9 ). Also 3 forms 8 with ^tBuPCl₂. The cleavage of the Me₃Si–P‐bond in 1 by means of C₂Cl₆ or N‐bromo‐succinimide yields (Cl)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 10 ) or (Br)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 11 ), resp. With LiP(SiMe₃)₂, 10 forms (Me₃Si)₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 12 ), and Et₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 13 ) with LiPEt₂. All compounds are characterized by ³¹P NMR Data and mass spectra; the ylide 5 and the THF adduct of 4 additionally by X‐ray structure analyses.     

Synthesis of a “Masked” Terminal Nickel(II) Sulfide by Reductive Deprotection and its Reaction with Nitrous Oxide

The addition of 1 equiv of KSCPh₃ to [L^RNiCl] (L^R={(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(R)}₂CH; R=Me, tBu) in C₆H₆ results in the formation of [L^RNi(SCPh₃)] ( 1 : R=Me; 2 : R=tBu) in good yields. Subsequent reduction of 1 and 2 with 2 equiv of KC₈ in cold (?25 °C) Et₂O in the presence of 2 equiv of 18‐crown‐6 results in the formation of “masked” terminal Ni^II sulfides, [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^RNi(S)] ( 3 : R=Me; 4 : R=tBu), also in good yields. An X‐ray crystallographic analysis of these complexes suggests that they feature partial multiple‐bond character in their Ni? S linkages. Addition of N₂O to a toluene solution of 4 provides [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^tBuNi(SN?NO)], which features the first example of a thiohyponitrite (κ²‐[SN?NO]^2?) ligand.