Some 3‐connected 4‐edge‐critical non‐Hamiltonian graphs

Let γ(G) be the domination number of graph G, thus a graph G is k‐edge‐critical if γ (G) = k, and for every nonadjacent pair of vertices u and υ, γ(G + uυ) = k?1. In Chapter 16 of the book “Domination in Graphs—Advanced Topics,” D. Sumner cites a conjecture of E. Wojcicka under the form “3‐connected 4‐critical graphs are Hamiltonian and perhaps, in general (i.e., for any k ≥ 4), (k?1)‐connected, k‐edge‐critical graphs are Hamiltonian.” In this paper, we prove that the conjecture is not true for k = 4 by constructing a class of 3‐connected 4‐edge‐critical non‐Hamiltonian graphs. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Large set of P3‐decompositions

Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a graph. A (n,G, λ)‐GD is a partition of the edges of λK_n into subgraphs (G‐blocks), each of which is isomorphic to G. The (n,G,λ)‐GD is named as graph design for G or G‐decomposition. The large set of (n,G,λ)‐GD is denoted by (n,G,λ)‐LGD. In this work, we obtain the existence spectrum of (n,P₃,λ)‐LGD. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 10: 151–159, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/jcd.10008     

3‐Factor‐Criticality of Vertex‐Transitive Graphs

A graph of order n is p ‐factor‐critical, where p is an integer of the same parity as n, if the removal of any set of p vertices results in a graph with a perfect matching. 1‐factor‐critical graphs and 2‐factor‐critical graphs are factor‐critical graphs and bicritical graphs, respectively. It is well known that every connected vertex‐transitive graph of odd order is factor‐critical and every connected nonbipartite vertex‐transitive graph of even order is bicritical. In this article, we show that a simple connected vertex‐transitive graph of odd order at least five is 3‐factor‐critical if and only if it is not a cycle.     

Total domination in 2‐connected graphs and in graphs with no induced 6‐cycles

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γ_t(G) of G. It is known [J Graph Theory 35 (2000), 21–45] that if G is a connected graph of order n > 10 with minimum degree at least 2, then γ_t(G) ≤ 4n/7 and the (infinite family of) graphs of large order that achieve equality in this bound are characterized. In this article, we improve this upper bound of 4n/7 for 2‐connected graphs, as well as for connected graphs with no induced 6‐cycle. We prove that if G is a 2‐connected graph of order n > 18, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Our proof is an interplay between graph theory and transversals in hypergraphs. We also prove that if G is a connected graph of order n > 18 with minimum degree at least 2 and no induced 6‐cycle, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Both bounds are shown to be sharp. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 55–79, 2009     

Maximal σ‐polynomials of connected 3‐chromatic graphs

In the set of graphs of order n and chromatic number k the following partial order relation is defined. One says that a graph G is less than a graph H if c_i(G) ≤ c_i(H) holds for every i, k ≤ i ≤ n and at least one inequality is strict, where c_i(G) denotes the number of i‐color partitions of G. In this paper the first ? n/2 ? levels of the diagram of the partially ordered set of connected 3‐chromatic graphs of order n are described. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 210–222, 2003     

Cyclability of 3‐connected graphs

A subset S of vertices of a graph G is called cyclable in G if there is in G some cycle containing all the vertices of S. We denote by α(S, G) the number of vertices of a maximum independent set of G[S]. We prove that if G is a 3‐connected graph or order n and if S is a subset of vertices such that the degree sum of any four independent vertices of S is at least n + 2α(S, G) −2, then S is cyclable. This result implies several known results on cyclability or Hamiltonicity. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 191–203, 2000     

Hamilton cycles in 3‐out

Let G_3‐out denote the random graph on vertex set [n] in which each vertex chooses three neighbors uniformly at random. Note that G_3‐out has minimum degree 3 and average degree 6. We prove that the probability that G_3‐out is Hamiltonian goes to 1 as n tends to infinity. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2009     

Claw‐free graphs and 2‐factors that separate independent vertices

In this article, we prove that a line graph with minimum degree δ≥7 has a spanning subgraph in which every component is a clique of order at least three. This implies that if G is a line graph with δ≥7, then for any independent set S there is a 2‐factor of G such that each cycle contains at most one vertex of S. This supports the conjecture that δ≥5 is sufficient to imply the existence of such a 2‐factor in the larger class of claw‐free graphs. It is also shown that if G is a claw‐free graph of order n and independence number α with δ≥2n/α?2 and n≥3α³/2, then for any maximum independent set S, G has a 2‐factor with α cycles such that each cycle contains one vertex of S. This is in support of a conjecture that δ≥n/α≥5 is sufficient to imply the existence of a 2‐factor with α cycles, each containing one vertex of a maximum independent set. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 69: 251–263, 2012     

Archimedean ϕ ‐tolerance graphs

Let ? be a symmetric binary function, positive valued on positive arguments. A graph G = (V,E) is a ?‐tolerance graph if each vertex υ ∈ V can be assigned a closed interval I_υ and a positive tolerance t_υ so that xy ∈ E ? | I_x ∩ I_y|≥ ? (t_x,t_y). An Archimedean function has the property of tending to infinity whenever one of its arguments tends to infinity. Generalizing a known result of [15] for trees, we prove that every graph in a large class (which includes all chordless suns and cacti and the complete bipartite graphs K_2,k) is a ?‐tolerance graph for all Archimedean functions ?. This property does not hold for most graphs. Next, we present the result that every graph G can be represented as a ?_G‐tolerance graph for some Archimedean polynomial ?_G. Finally, we prove that there is a ?universal”? Archimedean function ? ^* such that every graph G is a ?^*‐tolerance graph. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 41: 179–194, 2002     

On packing 3‐vertex paths in a graph

Let G be a connected graph and let eb(G) and λ(G) denote the number of end‐blocks and the maximum number of disjoint 3‐vertex paths Λ in G. We prove the following theorems on claw‐free graphs: (t1) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≤ 2 (and in particular, G is 2‐connected) then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G)|/3⌋; (t2) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≥ 2 then λ(G) ≥ ⌊(| V(G) | − eb(G) + 2)/3 ⌋; and (t3) if G is claw‐free and Δ^*‐free then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G) |/3⌋ (here Δ^* is a graph obtained from a triangle Δ by attaching to each vertex a new dangling edge). We also give the following sufficient condition for a graph to have a Λ‐factor: Let n and p be integers, 1 ≤ p ≤ n − 2, G a 2‐connected graph, and |V(G)| = 3n. Suppose that G − S has a Λ‐factor for every S ⊆ V(G) such that |S| = 3p and both V(G) − S and S induce connected subgraphs in G. Then G has a Λ‐factor. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 175–197, 2001     

2‐ and 3‐factors of graphs on surfaces

It has been conjectured that any 5‐connected graph embedded in a surface Σ with sufficiently large face‐width is hamiltonian. This conjecture was verified by Yu for the triangulation case, but it is still open in general. The conjecture is not true for 4‐connected graphs. In this article, we shall study the existence of 2‐ and 3‐factors in a graph embedded in a surface Σ. A hamiltonian cycle is a special case of a 2‐factor. Thus, it is quite natural to consider the existence of these factors. We give an evidence to the conjecture in a sense of the existence of a 2‐factor. In fact, we only need the 4‐connectivity with minimum degree at least 5. In addition, our face‐width condition is not huge. Specifically, we prove the following two results. Let G be a graph embedded in a surface Σ of Euler genus g.

• (1) If G is 4‐connected and minimum degree of G is at least 5, and furthermore, face‐width of G is at least 4g?12, then G has a 2‐factor.
• (2) If G is 5‐connected and face‐width of G is at least max{44g?117, 5}, then G has a 3‐factor.

The connectivity condition for both results are best possible. In addition, the face‐width conditions are necessary too. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:306‐315, 2011     

3‐Flows and Combs

Tutte's 3‐Flow Conjecture states that every 2‐edge‐connected graph with no 3‐cuts admits a 3‐flow. The 3‐Flow Conjecture is equivalent to the following: let G be a 2‐edge‐connected graph, let S be a set of at most three vertices of G; if every 3‐cut of G separates S then G has a 3‐flow. We show that minimum counterexamples to the latter statement are 3‐connected, cyclically 4‐connected, and cyclically 7‐edge‐connected.     

On chromatic‐choosable graphs

A graph is chromatic‐choosable if its choice number coincides with its chromatic number. It is shown in this article that, for any graph G, if we join a sufficiently large complete graph to G, then we obtain a chromatic‐choosable graph. As a consequence, if the chromatic number of a graph G is close enough to the number of vertices in G, then G is chromatic‐choosable. We also propose a conjecture related to this fact. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 40: 130–135, 2002     

A Sufficient Condition for Edge Chromatic Critical Graphs to Be Hamiltonian—An Approach to Vizing's 2‐Factor Conjecture

In this article, we consider Vizing's 2‐Factor Conjecture which claims that any Δ‐critical graph has a 2‐factor, and show that if G is a Δ‐critical graph with n vertices satisfying , then G is Hamiltonian and thus G has a 2‐factor. Meanwhile in this article, we also consider long cycles of overfull critical graphs and obtain that if G is an overfull Δ‐critical graph with n vertices, then the circumference of G is at least min.© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Graph Theory 00: 1‐14, 2012     

1‐Factorizations of pseudorandom graphs

A 1‐factorization of a graph G is a collection of edge‐disjoint perfect matchings whose union is E(G). In this paper, we prove that for any ?>0, an (n,d,λ)‐graph G admits a 1‐factorization provided that n is even, C₀ ≤ d ≤ n?1 (where C₀=C₀(?) is a constant depending only on ?), and λ ≤ d^1??. In particular, since (as is well known) a typical random d‐regular graph G_n,d is such a graph, we obtain the existence of a 1‐factorization in a typical G_n,d for all C₀ ≤ d ≤ n?1, thereby extending to all possible values of d results obtained by Janson, and independently by Molloy, Robalewska, Robinson, and Wormald for fixed d. Moreover, we also obtain a lower bound for the number of distinct 1‐factorizations of such graphs G, which is better by a factor of 2^nd/2 than the previously best known lower bounds, even in the simplest case where G is the complete graph.     

The 3‐connectivity of a graph and the multiplicity of zero “2” of its chromatic polynomial

Let G be a graph of order n, maximum degree Δ, and minimum degree δ. Let P(G, λ) be the chromatic polynomial of G. It is known that the multiplicity of zero “0” of P(G, λ) is one if G is connected, and the multiplicity of zero “1” of P(G, λ) is one if G is 2‐connected. Is the multiplicity of zero “2” of P(G, λ) at most one if G is 3‐connected? In this article, we first construct an infinite family of 3‐connected graphs G such that the multiplicity of zero “2” of P(G, λ) is more than one, and then characterize 3‐connected graphs G with Δ + δ?n such that the multiplicity of zero “2” of P(G, λ) is at most one. In particular, we show that for a 3‐connected graph G, if Δ + δ?n and (Δ, δ₃)≠(n?3, 3), where δ₃ is the third minimum degree of G, then the multiplicity of zero “2” of P(G, λ) is at most one. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

The symmetric (2k,k)‐graphs

A noncomplete graph G is called an (n, k)‐graph if it is n‐connected and G − X is not (n − |X| + 1)‐connected for any X ⊆ V(G) with |X| ≤ k. Mader conjectured that for k ≥ 3 the graph K_{2k + 2} − (1‐factor) is the unique (2k, k)‐graph. We settle this conjecture for strongly regular graphs, for edge transitive graphs, and for vertex transitive graphs. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 35–51, 2001     

Long cycles in 3‐connected graphs in orientable surfaces

In this article, we apply a cutting theorem of Thomassen to show that there is a function f: N → N such that if G is a 3‐connected graph on n vertices which can be embedded in the orientable surface of genus g with face‐width at least f(g), then G contains a cycle of length at least cn, where c is a constant not dependent on g. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 41: 69–84, 2002     

Every 3‐connected claw‐free Z8‐free graph is Hamiltonian

A biclique of a graph G is a maximal induced complete bipartite subgraph of G. Given a graph G, the biclique matrix of G is a {0,1,?1} matrix having one row for each biclique and one column for each vertex of G, and such that a pair of 1, ?1 entries in a same row corresponds exactly to adjacent vertices in the corresponding biclique. We describe a characterization of biclique matrices, in similar terms as those employed in Gilmore's characterization of clique matrices. On the other hand, the biclique graph of a graph is the intersection graph of the bicliques of G. Using the concept of biclique matrices, we describe a Krausz‐type characterization of biclique graphs. Finally, we show that every induced P₃ of a biclique graph must be included in a diamond or in a 3‐fan and we also characterize biclique graphs of bipartite graphs. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 63: 1–16, 2010     

3‐Coloring Triangle‐Free Planar Graphs with a Precolored 8‐Cycle

Let G be a planar triangle‐free graph and let C be a cycle in G of length at most 8. We characterize all situations where a 3‐coloring of C does not extend to a proper 3‐coloring of the whole graph.