Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations

An original methodology for using rough sets to preference modeling in multi-criteria decision problems is presented. This methodology operates on a pairwise comparison table (PCT), including pairs of actions described by graded preference relations on particular criteria and by a comprehensive preference relation. It builds up a rough approximation of a preference relation by graded dominance relations. Decision rules derived from the rough approximation of a preference relation can be used to obtain a recommendation in multi-criteria choice and ranking problems. The methodology is illustrated by an example of multi-criteria programming of water supply systems.     

Rough sets for pattern classification using pairwise-comparison-based tables

Rough set theory is a useful mathematical tool to deal with vagueness and uncertainty in available information. The results of a rough set approach are usually presented in the form of a set of decision rules derived from a decision table. Because using the original decision table is not the only way to implement a rough set approach, it could be interesting to investigate possible improvement in classification performance by replacing the original table with an alternative table obtained by pairwise comparisons among patterns. In this paper, a decision table based on pairwise comparisons is generated using the preference relation as in the Preference Ranking Organization Methods for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods, to gauges the intensity of preference for one pattern over another pattern on each criterion before classification. The rough-set-based rule classifier (RSRC) provided by the well-known library for the Rough Set Exploration System (RSES) running under Windows as been successfully used to generate decision rules by using the pairwise-comparisons-based tables. Specifically, parameters related to the preference function on each criterion have been determined using a genetic-algorithm-based approach. Computer simulations involving several real-world data sets have revealed that of the proposed classification method performs well compared to other well-known classification methods and to RSRC using the original tables.     

Multicriteria decision support using rules that represent rough-graded preference relations

The approach described in this paper aims to support multicriteria choice and ranking of actions when the input preference information acquired from the decision maker is a graded comprehensive pairwise comparison (or ranking) of reference actions. It is based on decision-rule preference model induced from a rough approximation of the graded comprehensive preference relation among the reference actions. The set of decision rules applied to a new set of actions provides a graded fuzzy preference relation, which can be exploited by weighted-fuzzy net flow score or lexicographic-fuzzy net flow score procedure to obtain a final recommendation in terms of the best choice or of the ranking.     

Extended rough set model based on known same probability dominant valued tolerance relation

Classical rough set theory is based on the conventional indiscernibility relation. It is not suitable for analyzing incomplete information. Some successful extended rough set models based on different non-equivalence relations have been proposed. The data-driven valued tolerance relation is such a non-equivalence relation. However, the calculation method of tolerance degree has some limitations. In this paper, known same probability dominant valued tolerance relation is proposed to solve this problem. On this basis, an extended rough set model based on known same probability dominant valued tolerance relation is presented. Some properties of the new model are analyzed. In order to compare the classification performance of different generalized indiscernibility relations, based on the category utility function in cluster analysis, an incomplete category utility function is proposed, which can measure the classification performance of different generalized indiscernibility relations effectively. Experimental results show that the known same probability dominant valued tolerance relation can get better classification results than other generalized indiscernibility relations.     

Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm

Most multicriteria decision methods need the definition of a significant amount of preferential information from a decision agent. The preference disaggregation analysis paradigm infers the model’s parameter values from holistic judgments provided by a decision agent. Here, a new method for inferring the parameters of a fuzzy outranking model for multicriteria sorting is proposed. This approach allows us to use most of the preferential information contained in a reference set. The central idea is to characterize the quality of the model by measuring discrepancies and concordances amongst (i) the preference relations derived from the outranking model, and (ii) the preferential information contained in the reference set. The model’s parameters are inferred from a multiobjective optimization problem, according to some additional preferential information from a decision agent. Once the model has been fitted, sorting decisions about new objects are performed by using a fuzzy indifference relation. This proposal performs very well in some examples.     

基于属性约简的分类及其应用

约简是粗糙集用于数据分析的重要方法和手段,也是粗糙集理论的核心内容之一.论域U上的等价关系可以确定U的划分,U上的不可区分关系是等价关系.利用不可区分关系定义信息系统的划分协调集及划分约简集,而且证明了划分约简集的判定定理,并将其应用于实际分类问题.     

Hybrid approaches to attribute reduction based on indiscernibility and discernibility relation

Attribute reduction is one of the key issues in rough set theory. Many heuristic attribute reduction algorithms such as positive-region reduction, information entropy reduction and discernibility matrix reduction have been proposed. However, these methods are usually computationally time-consuming for large data. Moreover, a single attribute significance measure is not good for more attributes with the same greatest value. To overcome these shortcomings, we first introduce a counting sort algorithm with time complexity O(∣C∣ ∣U∣) for dealing with redundant and inconsistent data in a decision table and computing positive regions and core attributes (∣C∣ and ∣U∣ denote the cardinalities of condition attributes and objects set, respectively). Then, hybrid attribute measures are constructed which reflect the significance of an attribute in positive regions and boundary regions. Finally, hybrid approaches to attribute reduction based on indiscernibility and discernibility relation are proposed with time complexity no more than max(O(∣C∣²∣U/C∣), O(∣C∣∣U∣)), in which ∣U/C∣ denotes the cardinality of the equivalence classes set U/C. The experimental results show that these proposed hybrid algorithms are effective and feasible for large data.     

A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems

This paper presents a special multiple criteria decision making approach for solving problems in context with fuzzy individual preferences.At first we briefly expose the proposed methodology. The individual preferences are explicitly given by a complete transitive relation R on a set of reference actions. The modelling of the decision-maker's preferences is obtained by means of fuzzy outranking relations. These fuzzy relations are based on a system of additive utility functions which are estimated by means of ordinal regression methods analysing the preference relation R.This is followed by a presentation of two real multicriteria problems which the proposed methodology has been applied to, i.e. a highway plan choice problem and a problem in marketing research dealing with the launching of a new product. In each application we tried to specify this method according to the specific structure of the problem considered.     

Global investing risk: a case study of knowledge assessment via rough sets

This paper presents an application of knowledge discovery via rough sets to a real life case study of global investing risk in 52 countries using 27 indicator variables. The aim is explanation of the classification of the countries according to financial risks assessed by Wall Street Journal international experts and knowledge discovery from data via decision rule mining, rather than prediction; i.e. to capture the explicit or implicit knowledge or policy of international financial experts, rather than to predict the actual classifications. Suggestions are made about the most significant attributes for each risk class and country, as well as the minimal set of decision rules needed. Our results compared favorably with those from discriminant analysis and several variations of preference disaggregation MCDA procedures. The same approach could be adapted to other problems with missing data in data mining, knowledge extraction, and different multi-criteria decision problems, like sorting, choice and ranking.     

On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations

Inspired by the concept of deviation measure between two linguistic preference relations, this paper further defines the deviation measure of a linguistic preference relation to the set of consistent linguistic preference relations. Based on this, we present a consistency index of linguistic preference relations and develop a consistency measure method for linguistic preference relations. This method is performed to ensure that the decision maker is being neither random nor illogical in his or her pairwise comparisons using the linguistic label set. Using this consistency measure, we discuss how to deal with inconsistency in linguistic preference relations, and also investigate the consistency properties of collective linguistic preference relations. These results are of vital importance for group decision making with linguistic preference relations.     

Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems

Let A be a set of actions evaluated by a set of attributes. Two kinds of evaluations will be considered in this paper: determinist or stochastic in relation to each attribute. The multi-attribute stochastic dominance (MSD_r) for a reduced number of attributes will be suggested to model the preferences in this kind of problem. The case of mixed data, where we have the attributes of different natures is not well known in the literature, although it is essential from a practical point of view. To apply the MSD_r the subset R of attributes from which approximation of the global preference is valid should be known. The theory of Rough Sets gives us an answer on this issue allowing us to determine a minimal subset of attributes that enables the same classification of objects as the whole set of attributes. In our approach these objects are pairs of actions. In order to represent preferential information we shall use a pairwise comparison table. This table is built for subset B⊂A described by stochastic dominance (SD) relations for particular attributes and a total order for the decision attribute given by the decision maker (DM). Using a Rough Set approach to the analysis of the subset of preference relations, a set of decision rules is obtained, and these are applied to a set A⧹B of potential actions. The Rough Set approach of looking for the reduction of the set of attributes gives us the possibility of operating with MSD_r.     

Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision making

In the paper, the term consensus scheme is utilized to denote a dynamic and iterative process where the experts involved discuss a multicriteria decision problem. This discussion process is conducted by a human or artificial moderator, with the purpose of minimizing the discrepancy between the individual opinions.During the process of decision making, each expert involved must provide preference information. The information format and the circumstances where it must be given play a critical role in the decision process. This paper analyses a generic consensus scheme, which considers many different preference input formats, several possible interventions of the moderator, as well as admitting several stop conditions for interrupting the discussion process. In addition, a new consensus scheme is proposed with the intention of eliminating some difficulties met when the traditional consensus schemes are utilized in real applications. It preserves the experts’ integrity through the intervention of an external person, to supervise and mediate the conflicting situations. The human moderator is supposed to interfere in the discussion process by adjusting some parameters of the mathematical model or by inviting an expert to update his opinion. The usefulness of this consensus scheme is demonstrated by its use to solve a multicriteria group decision problem, generated applying the Balanced Scorecard methodology for enterprise strategy planning. In the illustrating problem, the experts are allowed to give their preferences in different input formats. But the information provided is made uniform on the basis of fuzzy preference relations through the use of adequate transformation functions, before being analyzed. The advantage of using fuzzy set theory for solving multiperson multicriteria decision problems lies in the fact that it can provide the flexibility needed to adequately deal with the uncertain factors intrinsic to such problems.     

Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision making

In the paper, the term consensus scheme is utilized to denote a dynamic and iterative process where the experts involved discuss a multicriteria decision problem. This discussion process is conducted by a human or artificial moderator, with the purpose of minimizing the discrepancy between the individual opinions.During the process of decision making, each expert involved must provide preference information. The information format and the circumstances where it must be given play a critical role in the decision process. This paper analyses a generic consensus scheme, which considers many different preference input formats, several possible interventions of the moderator, as well as admitting several stop conditions for interrupting the discussion process. In addition, a new consensus scheme is proposed with the intention of eliminating some difficulties met when the traditional consensus schemes are utilized in real applications. It preserves the experts’ integrity through the intervention of an external person, to supervise and mediate the conflicting situations. The human moderator is supposed to interfere in the discussion process by adjusting some parameters of the mathematical model or by inviting an expert to update his opinion. The usefulness of this consensus scheme is demonstrated by its use to solve a multicriteria group decision problem, generated applying the Balanced Scorecard methodology for enterprise strategy planning. In the illustrating problem, the experts are allowed to give their preferences in different input formats. But the information provided is made uniform on the basis of fuzzy preference relations through the use of adequate transformation functions, before being analyzed. The advantage of using fuzzy set theory for solving multiperson multicriteria decision problems lies in the fact that it can provide the flexibility needed to adequately deal with the uncertain factors intrinsic to such problems.     

Rough set-based logics for multicriteria decision analysis

In this paper, we propose some decision logic languages for rule representation in rough set-based multicriteria analysis. The semantic models of these logics are data tables, each of which is comprised of a finite set of objects described by a finite set of criteria/attributes. The domains of the criteria may have ordinal properties expressing preference scales, while the domains of the attributes may not. The validity, support, and confidence of a rule are defined via its satisfaction in the data table.     

均值限制相似优势粗糙集及决策分析模型研究

针对不完备信息系统中的偏好多属性决策问题,提出了一种基于均值限制相似优势粗糙集的决策分析模型.首先提出了均值限制相似优势关系的概念;然后在均值限制相似优势关系下得到知识的粗糙近似和属性约简,给出了分类决策规则.与相似优势关系和限制相似优势关系比较研究的结果表明:均值限制优势关系的分类精度和质量介于二者之间,而分类误差率则优于相似优势关系和限制相似优势关系,得到的决策规则可信度更高,决策模型与实际情况更加相符.     

Dominance-based fuzzy rough set analysis of uncertain and possibilistic data tables

In this paper, we propose a dominance-based fuzzy rough set approach for the decision analysis of a preference-ordered uncertain or possibilistic data table, which is comprised of a finite set of objects described by a finite set of criteria. The domains of the criteria may have ordinal properties that express preference scales. In the proposed approach, we first compute the degree of dominance between any two objects based on their imprecise evaluations with respect to each criterion. This results in a valued dominance relation on the universe. Then, we define the degree of adherence to the dominance principle by every pair of objects and the degree of consistency of each object. The consistency degrees of all objects are aggregated to derive the quality of the classification, which we use to define the reducts of a data table. In addition, the upward and downward unions of decision classes are fuzzy subsets of the universe. Thus, the lower and upper approximations of the decision classes based on the valued dominance relation are fuzzy rough sets. By using the lower approximations of the decision classes, we can derive two types of decision rules that can be applied to new decision cases.     

A preference-based approach to spanning trees and shortest paths problems****

Comparison of solutions in combinatorial problems is often based on an additive cost function inducing a complete order on solutions. We investigate here a generalization of the problem, where preferences take the form of a quasi-transitive binary relation defined on the solutions space. We first propose preference-based search algorithms for two classical combinatorial problems, namely the preferred spanning trees problem (a generalization of the minimum spanning tree problem) and the preferred paths problem (a generalization of the shortest path problem). Then, we introduce a very useful axiom for preference relations called independence. Using this axiom, we establish admissibility results concerning our preference-based search algorithms. Finally, we address the problem of dealing with non-independent preference relations and provide different possible solutions for different particular problems (e.g. lower approximation of the set of preferred solutions for multicriteria spanning trees problems, or relaxation of the independence axiom for interval-valued preferred path problems).     

A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making

The soft set theory, originally proposed by Molodtsov, can be used as a general mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. Since its appearance, there has been some progress concerning practical applications of soft set theory, especially the use of soft sets in decision making. The intuitionistic fuzzy soft set is a combination of an intuitionistic fuzzy set and a soft set. The rough set theory is a powerful tool for dealing with uncertainty, granuality and incompleteness of knowledge in information systems. Using rough set theory, this paper proposes a novel approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making problems. Firstly, by employing an intuitionistic fuzzy relation and a threshold value pair, we define a new rough set model and examine some fundamental properties of this rough set model. Then the concepts of approximate precision and rough degree are given and some basic properties are discussed. Furthermore, we investigate the relationship between intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and intuitionistic fuzzy relations and present a rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Finally, an illustrative example is employed to show the validity of this rough set approach in intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making problems.     

Rough set theory: a novel approach for extraction of robust decision rules based on incremental attributes

Rough set theory is a new data mining approach to manage vagueness. It is capable to discover important facts hidden in the data. Literature indicate the current rough set based approaches can’t guarantee that classification of a decision table is credible and it is not able to generate robust decision rules when new attributes are incrementally added in. In this study, an incremental attribute oriented rule-extraction algorithm is proposed to solve this deficiency commonly observed in the literature related to decision rule induction. The proposed approach considers incremental attributes based on the alternative rule extraction algorithm (AREA), which was presented for discovering preference-based rules according to the reducts with the maximum of strength index (SI), specifically the case that the desired reducts are not necessarily unique since several reducts could include the same value of SI. Using the AREA, an alternative rule can be defined as the rule which holds identical preference to the original decision rule and may be more attractive to a decision-maker than the original one. Through implementing the proposed approach, it can be effectively operating with new attributes to be added in the database/information systems. It is not required to re-compute the updated data set similar to the first step at the initial stage. The proposed algorithm also excludes these repetitive rules during the solution search stage since most of the rule induction approaches generate the repetitive rules. The proposed approach is capable to efficiently and effectively generate the complete, robust and non-repetitive decision rules. The rules derived from the data set provide an indication of how to effectively study this problem in further investigations.     

Multi-criteria classification – A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules

We are considering the problem of multi-criteria classification. In this problem, a set of “if … then …” decision rules is used as a preference model to classify objects evaluated by a set of criteria and regular attributes. Given a sample of classification examples, called learning data set, the rules are induced from dominance-based rough approximations of preference-ordered decision classes, according to the Variable Consistency Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (VC-DRSA). The main question to be answered in this paper is how to classify an object using decision rules in situation where it is covered by (i) no rule, (ii) exactly one rule, (iii) several rules. The proposed classification scheme can be applied to both, learning data set (to restore the classification known from examples) and testing data set (to predict classification of new objects). A hypothetical example from the area of telecommunications is used for illustration of the proposed classification method and for a comparison with some previous proposals.