首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
Let G be a topological group with the identity element e. Given a space X, we denote by Cp(X,G) the group of all continuous functions from X to G endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence, and we say that X is: (a) G-regular if, for each closed set FX and every point xX?F, there exist fCp(X,G) and gG?{e} such that f(x)=g and f(F)⊆{e}; (b) G?-regular provided that there exists gG?{e} such that, for each closed set FX and every point xX?F, one can find fCp(X,G) with f(x)=g and f(F)⊆{e}. Spaces X and Y are G-equivalent provided that the topological groups Cp(X,G) and Cp(Y,G) are topologically isomorphic.We investigate which topological properties are preserved by G-equivalence, with a special emphasis being placed on characterizing topological properties of X in terms of those of Cp(X,G). Since R-equivalence coincides with l-equivalence, this line of research “includes” major topics of the classical Cp-theory of Arhangel'ski? as a particular case (when G=R).We introduce a new class of TAP groups that contains all groups having no small subgroups (NSS groups). We prove that: (i) for a given NSS group G, a G-regular space X is pseudocompact if and only if Cp(X,G) is TAP, and (ii) for a metrizable NSS group G, a G?-regular space X is compact if and only if Cp(X,G) is a TAP group of countable tightness. In particular, a Tychonoff space X is pseudocompact (compact) if and only if Cp(X,R) is a TAP group (of countable tightness). Demonstrating the limits of the result in (i), we give an example of a precompact TAP group G and a G-regular countably compact space X such that Cp(X,G) is not TAP.We show that Tychonoff spaces X and Y are T-equivalent if and only if their free precompact Abelian groups are topologically isomorphic, where T stays for the quotient group R/Z. As a corollary, we obtain that T-equivalence implies G-equivalence for every Abelian precompact group G. We establish that T-equivalence preserves the following topological properties: compactness, pseudocompactness, σ-compactness, the property of being a Lindelöf Σ-space, the property of being a compact metrizable space, the (finite) number of connected components, connectedness, total disconnectedness. An example of R-equivalent (that is, l-equivalent) spaces that are not T-equivalent is constructed.  相似文献   

2.
Within the class of Tychonoff spaces, and within the class of topological groups, most of the natural questions concerning ‘productive closure’ of the subclasses of countably compact and pseudocompact spaces are answered by the following three well-known results: (1) [ZFC] There is a countably compact Tychonoff space X such that X × X is not pseudocompact; (2) [ZFC] The product of any set of pseudocompact topological groups is pseudocompact; and (3) [ZFC+ MA] There are countably compact topological groups G0, G1 such that G0 × G1 is not countably compact.In this paper we consider the question of ‘productive closure” in the intermediate class of homogeneous spaces. Our principal result, whose proof leans heavily on a simple, elegant result of V.V. Uspenski?, is this: In ZFC there are pseudocompact, homogeneous spaces X0, X1 such that X0 × X1 is not pseudocompact; if in addition MA is assumed, the spaces Xi may be chosen countably compact.Our construction yields an unexpected corollary in a different direction: Every compact space embeds as a retract in a countably compact, homogeneous space. Thus for every cardinal number α there is a countably compact, homogeneous space whose Souslin number exceeds α.  相似文献   

3.
4.
We introduce the notion of a partially selective ultrafilter and prove that (a) if G is an extremally disconnected topological group and p is a converging nonprincipal ultrafilter on G containing a countable discrete subset, then p is partially selective, and (b) the existence of a nonprincipal partially selective ultrafilter on a countable set implies the existence of a P-point in ω. Thus it is consistent with ZFC that there is no extremally disconnected topological group containing a countable discrete nonclosed subset.  相似文献   

5.
A topological Abelian group G is called (strongly) self-dual if there exists a topological isomorphism Φ:GG of G onto the dual group G (such that Φ(x)(y)=Φ(y)(x) for all x,yG). We prove that every countably compact self-dual Abelian group is finite. It turns out, however, that for every infinite cardinal κ with κω=κ, there exists a pseudocompact, non-compact, strongly self-dual Boolean group of cardinality κ.  相似文献   

6.
A space X is said to be selectively separable (=M-separable) if for each sequence {Dn:nω} of dense subsets of X, there are finite sets FnDn (nω) such that ?{Fn:nω} is dense in X. On selective separability and its variations, we show the following: (1) Selective separability, R-separability and GN-separability are preserved under finite unions; (2) Assuming CH (the continuum hypothesis), there is a countable regular maximal R-separable space X such that X2 is not selectively separable; (3) c{0,1} has a selectively separable, countable and dense subset S such that the group generated by S is not selectively separable. These answer some questions posed in Bella et al. (2008) [7].  相似文献   

7.
This article is a natural continuation of [A.V. Arhangel'skii, Remainders in compactifications and generalized metrizability properties, Topology Appl. 150 (2005) 79-90]. As in [A.V. Arhangel'skii, Remainders in compactifications and generalized metrizability properties, Topology Appl. 150 (2005) 79-90], we consider the following general question: when does a Tychonoff space X have a Hausdorff compactification with a remainder belonging to a given class of spaces? A famous classical result in this direction is the well known theorem of M. Henriksen and J. Isbell [M. Henriksen, J.R. Isbell, Some properties of compactifications, Duke Math. J. 25 (1958) 83-106].It is shown that if a non-locally compact topological group G has a compactification bG such that the remainder Y=bG?G has a Gδ-diagonal, then both G and Y are separable and metrizable spaces (Theorem 5). Several corollaries are derived from this result, in particular, this one: If a compact Hausdorff space X is first countable at least at one point, and X can be represented as the union of two complementary dense subspaces Y and Z, each of which is homeomorphic to a topological group (not necessarily the same), then X is separable and metrizable (Theorem 12). It is observed that Theorem 5 does not extend to arbitrary paratopological groups. We also establish that if a topological group G has a remainder with a point-countable base, then either G is locally compact, or G is separable and metrizable.  相似文献   

8.
We consider the following natural questions: when a topological group G has a first countable remainder, when G has a remainder of countable tightness? This leads to some further questions on the properties of remainders of topological groups. Let G be a topological group. The following facts are established. 1. If Gω has a first countable remainder, then either G is metrizable, or G is locally compact. 2. If G has a countable network and a first countable remainder, then either G is separable and metrizable, or G is σ-compact. 3. Under (MA+¬CH) every topological group with a countable network and a first countable remainder is separable and metrizable. Some new open problems are formulated.  相似文献   

9.
Let X denote the product of m-many second countable Hausdorff spaces. Main theorems: (1) If S?X is invariant under compositions, m is weakly accessible (resp., nonmeasurable), and F?S is sequentially closed and a sequential Gσ-set which is invariant under projections for finite sets (resp., F?S is sequentially open and sequentially closed), then F is closed. (2) If S?X is invariant under projections and m is nonmeasurable, then every sequentially continuous {0, 1} valued function on S is continuous. (3) A sequentially continuous {0, 1}-valued function on an m-adic space of nonmeasurable weight is continuous. Now let X denote the product of arbitrarily many W-spaces and S?X be invariant under compositions. (4) Then in S, the closure of any Q-open subset coincides with its sequential closure.  相似文献   

10.
All spaces are assumed to be Tychonoff. A space X is called projectively P (where P is a topological property) if every continuous second countable image of X is P. Characterizations of projectively Menger spaces X in terms of continuous mappings , of Menger base property with respect to separable pseudometrics and a selection principle restricted to countable covers by cozero sets are given. If all finite powers of X are projectively Menger, then all countable subspaces of Cp(X) have countable fan tightness. The class of projectively Menger spaces contains all Menger spaces as well as all σ-pseudocompact spaces, and all spaces of cardinality less than d. Projective versions of Hurewicz, Rothberger and other selection principles satisfy properties similar to the properties of projectively Menger spaces, as well as some specific properties. Thus, X is projectively Hurewicz iff Cp(X) has the Monotonic Sequence Selection Property in the sense of Scheepers; βX is Rothberger iff X is pseudocompact and projectively Rothberger. Embeddability of the countable fan space Vω into Cp(X) or Cp(X,2) is characterized in terms of projective properties of X.  相似文献   

11.
We consider the question: when is a dense subset of a space XC-embedded in X? We introduce the notion of o-tightness and prove that if each finite subproduct of a product X = Πα?AXα has a countable o-tightness and Y is a subset of X such that πB(Y) = Πα?BXα for every countable B ? A, then Y is C-embedded in X. This result generalizes some of Noble and Ulmer's results on C-embedding.  相似文献   

12.
A topological space X is called linearly Lindelöf if every increasing open cover of X has a countable subcover. It is well known that every Lindelöf space is linearly Lindelöf. The converse implication holds only in particular cases, such as X being countably paracompact or if nw(X)<ω.Arhangel?skii and Buzyakova proved that the cardinality of a first countable linearly Lindelöf space does not exceed 02. Consequently, a first countable linearly Lindelöf space is Lindelöf if ω>02. They asked whether every linearly Lindelöf first countable space is Lindelöf in ZFC. This question is supported by the fact that all known linearly Lindelöf not Lindelöf spaces are of character at least ω. We answer this question in the negative by constructing a counterexample from MA+ω<02.A modification of Alster?s Michael space that is first countable is presented.  相似文献   

13.
A space X is said to satisfy condition (C) if for every Y?X with |Y|=ω1, any family G of open subsets of Y with |G|=ω1 has a countable network. It is easy to see that if X satisfies condition (C), then its Pixley-Roy hyperspace F[X] is CCC. We show that under MAω1 condition (C) is also necessary for F[X] to be CCC, but under CH it is not.  相似文献   

14.
We show that a Hausdorff paratopological group G admits a topological embedding as a subgroup into a topological product of Hausdorff first-countable (second-countable) paratopological groups if and only if G is ω-balanced (totally ω-narrow) and the Hausdorff number of G is countable, i.e., for every neighbourhood U of the neutral element e of G there exists a countable family γ of neighbourhoods of e such that ?VγVV−1⊆U. Similarly, we prove that a regular paratopological group G can be topologically embedded as a subgroup into a topological product of regular first-countable (second-countable) paratopological groups if and only if G is ω-balanced (totally ω-narrow) and the index of regularity of G is countable.As a by-product, we show that a regular totally ω-narrow paratopological group with countable index of regularity is Tychonoff.  相似文献   

15.
The recent literature offers examples, specific and hand-crafted, of Tychonoff spaces (in ZFC) which respond negatively to these questions, due respectively to Ceder and Pearson (1967) [3] and to Comfort and García-Ferreira (2001) [5]: (1) Is every ω-resolvable space maximally resolvable? (2) Is every maximally resolvable space extraresolvable? Now using the method of KID expansion, the authors show that every suitably restricted Tychonoff topological space (X,T) admits a larger Tychonoff topology (that is, an “expansion”) witnessing such failure. Specifically the authors show in ZFC that if (X,T) is a maximally resolvable Tychonoff space with S(X,T)?Δ(X,T)=κ, then (X,T) has Tychonoff expansions U=Ui (1?i?5), with Δ(X,Ui)=Δ(X,T) and S(X,Ui)?Δ(X,Ui), such that (X,Ui) is: (i=1) ω-resolvable but not maximally resolvable; (i=2) [if κ is regular, with S(X,T)?κ?κ] τ-resolvable for all τ<κ, but not κ-resolvable; (i=3) maximally resolvable, but not extraresolvable; (i=4) extraresolvable, but not maximally resolvable; (i=5) maximally resolvable and extraresolvable, but not strongly extraresolvable.  相似文献   

16.
We prove that, when G is a group equipped with a Baire and metrizable topology, if there is a second category dense subset S of G such that the right translations ρs and ρs−1 are continuous for all sS and each left translation λs, sG, is almost-continuous (defined below) on a residual subset of G, then G is a topological group. Among other consequences, this yields that when G is a second countable locally compact right topological group, its topological centre is a topological group.  相似文献   

17.
A Tychonoff space X is RG if the embedding of C(X)→C(Xδ) is an epimorphism of rings. Compact RG-spaces are known and easily described. We study the pseudocompact RG-spaces. These must be scattered of finite Cantor Bendixon degree but need not be locally compact. However, under strong hypotheses, (countable compactness, or small cardinality) these spaces must, indeed, be compact. The main theorems shows, how to construct a suitable maximal almost disjoint family, and apply it to obtain examples of RG-spaces that are almost compact, locally compact, non-compact, almost-P, and of Cantor Bendixon degree 2. More complicated examples of pseudocompact non-compact RG-spaces ensue.  相似文献   

18.
The complete Boolean homomorphisms from the category algebra C(X) of a complete matrix space X to the category algebra C(Y) of a Baire topological space Y are characterized as those σ-homomorphisms which are induced by continuous maps from dense G8-subsets of Y into X. This result is used to deduce a series of related results in topology and measure theory (some of which are well-known). Finally a similar result for the complete Boolean homomorphisms from the category algebra C(X) of a compact Hausdorff space X tothe category algebra C(Y) of a Baire topological space Y is proved.  相似文献   

19.
Let T(X) be the full transformation semigroup on the set X and let T(X,Y) be the semigroup consisting of all total transformations from X into a fixed subset Y of X. It is known that $$F(X, Y)=\{\alpha\in T(X, Y): X\alpha\subseteq Y\alpha\},$$ is the largest regular subsemigroup of T(X,Y) and determines Green??s relations on T(X,Y). In this paper, we show that F(X,Y)?T(Z) if and only if X=Y and |Y|=|Z|; or |Y|=1=|Z|, and prove that every regular semigroup S can be embedded in F(S 1,S). Then we describe Green??s relations and ideals of F(X,Y) and apply these results to get all of its maximal regular subsemigroups when Y is a nonempty finite subset of X.  相似文献   

20.
Results of Henriksen and Johnson, for archimedean f-rings with identity, and of Aron and Hager, for archimedean ?-groups with unit, relating uniform completeness to order-convexity of a representation in a D(X) (the lattice of almost real continuous functions on the space X) are extended to situations without identity or unit. For an archimedean ?-group, G, we show: if G admits any representation G?D(X) in which G is order-convex, then G is divisible and relatively uniformly complete. A converse to this would seem to require some sort of canonical representation of G, which seems not to exist in the ?-group case. But for a reduced archimedean f-ring, A, there is the Johnson representation A?D(XA), and we show: A is divisible, relatively uniformly complete and square-dominated if and only if A is order-convex in D(XA) and square-root-closed. Also, we expand on the situation with unit, where we have the Yosida representation, G?D(YG): if G is divisible, relatively uniformly complete, and the unit is a near unit, then G is order-convex in D(YG).  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号