Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

A 1‐Aza‐2‐silacyclobut‐3‐ene and an Alkyne from [Li{Si(SiMe3)3}(thf)3] and the Isocyanide 2,6‐Me2C6H3NC

The novel zwitterionic heterocycle 1 was unexpectedly obtained from the reaction between [Li(SiR₃)(thf)₃] and ArNC. Upon heating 1 underwent an interesting ring opening to give the alkyne 2 . Hence the C≡C bond effectively arises from the C−C coupling of two ArNC moieties. R=SiMe₃, Ar=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine.     

Dinuclear Rare‐Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Supported by Indolyl Ligands in μ‐η2:η1:η1 Hapticities and their High Catalytic Activity for Isoprene 1,4‐cis‐Polymerization

Two series of new dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes supported by indolyl ligands in novel μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ hapticities are synthesized and characterized. Treatment of [RE(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of 3‐(tBuN?CH)C₈H₅NH ( L₁ ) in THF gives the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH(CH₂SiMe₃)}Ind)RE(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (Ind=indolyl, RE=Y, Dy, or Yb) in good yields. In the process, the indole unit of L₁ is deprotonated by the metal alkyl species and the imino C?N group is transferred to the amido group by alkyl CH₂SiMe₃ insertion, affording a new dianionic ligand that bridges two metal alkyl units in μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ bonding modes, forming the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes. When L₁ is reduced to 3‐(tBuNHCH₂)C₈H₅NH ( L₂ ), the reaction of [Yb(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of L₂ in THF, interestingly, generated the trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (major) and cis‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (minor) complexes. The catalytic activities of these dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes for isoprene polymerization were investigated; the yttrium and dysprosium complexes exhibited high catalytic activities and high regio‐ and stereoselectivities for isoprene 1,4‐cis‐polymerization.     

Quantification of the β‐Stabilizing Effect of the Dicarbonyl(η5‐cyclopentadienyl)iron Group

Kinetic investigations of the reactions of (prop‐2‐enyl)dicarbonyl(cyclopentadienyl)iron complexes 1 with benzhydrylium ions 3 , and of dicarbonyl(cyclopentadienyl)[(1,2‐η)propene]iron(II) tetrafluoroborate ( 9 ⋅BF₄) with π‐nucleophiles have been performed to elucidate the magnitude of the β‐effect of the [(CO)₂FeCp] group (Fp group). Introduction of the Fp group into the allylic position of propene and 2‐methylpropene increases the nucleophilicity of the π‐bonds by nine and six orders of magnitude, respectively, with the result that the allyl‐Fp complexes 1a (N=6.78) and 1b (N=8.45) are among the strongest neutral π‐nucleophiles. Replacement of one β‐H‐atom in the isopropyl cation by the Fp group reduces the electrophilicity by more than 20 orders of magnitude, so that 9 ⁺ ranks among the weakest cationic C‐electrophiles (E=−11.2).     

Lutetium‐Methanediide‐Alkyl Complexes: Synthesis and Chemistry

The first four‐coordinate methanediide/alkyl lutetium complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐CHSiMe₃)(THF)₂ (BODDI=ArNC(Me)CHCOCHC(Me)NAr, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) was synthesized by a thermolysis methodology through α‐H abstraction from a Lu–CH₂SiMe₃ group. Complex 1 reacted with equimolar 2,6‐iPrC₆H₃NH₂ and Ph₂C?O to give the corresponding lutetium bridging imido and oxo complexes (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐N‐2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)(THF)₂ ( 2 ) and (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐O)(THF)₂ ( 3 ). Treatment of 3 with Ph₂C?O (4 equiv) caused a rare insertion of Lu–μ₂‐O bond into the C?O group to afford a diphenylmethyl diolate complex 4 . Reaction of 1 with PhN=C?O (2 equiv) led to the migration of SiMe₃ to the amido nitrogen atom to give complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂‐μ‐{PhNC(O)CHC(O)NPh(SiMe₃)‐κ³N,O,O}(THF) ( 5 ). Reaction of 1 with tBuN?C formed an unprecedented product (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃){μ₂‐[η²:η²‐tBuNC(=CH₂)SiMe₂CHC?NtBu‐κ¹N]}(tBuN?C)₂ ( 6 ) through a cascade reaction of N?C bond insertion, sequential cyclometalative γ‐(sp³)‐H activation, C?C bond formation, and rearrangement of the newly formed carbene intermediate. The possible mechanistic pathways between 1 , PhN?C?O, and tBuN?C were elucidated by DFT calculations.     

η5‐(3)‐1‐Methyl‐1,2‐dicarbollyl‐η5‐2′,5′‐dimethylpyrrolylcobalt(III)

In the title compound, (η⁵‐2,5‐di­methyl­pyrrolyl)[(7,8,9,10,11‐η)‐7‐methyl‐7,8‐dicarba‐nido‐undecaborato]­cobalt(III), [3‐Co{η⁵‐[2,5‐(CH₃)₂‐NC₄H₂]}‐1‐CH₃‐1,2‐C₂B₉H₁₀] or [Co(C₃H₁₃B₉)(C₆H₈N)], the Co^III atom is sandwiched between the pentagonal faces of the pyrrolyl and dicarbollide ligands, resulting in a neutral mol­ecule. The C—C distance in the dicarbollide cage is 1.649 (3) Å.     

An Alternative Mechanistic Paradigm for the β‐Z Hydrosilylation of Terminal Alkynes: The Role of Acetone as a Silane Shuttle

The β‐Z selectivity in the hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes has been hitherto explained by introduction of isomerisation steps in classical mechanisms. DFT calculations and experimental observations on the system [M(I)₂{κ‐C,C,O,O‐(bis‐NHC)}]BF₄ (M=Ir ( 3 a ), Rh ( 3 b ); bis‐NHC=methylenebis(N‐2‐methoxyethyl)imidazole‐2‐ylidene) support a new mechanism, alternative to classical postulations, based on an outer‐sphere model. Heterolytic splitting of the silane molecule by the metal centre and acetone (solvent) affords a metal hydride and the oxocarbenium ion [R₃Si? O(CH₃)₂]⁺, which reacts with the corresponding alkyne in solution to give the silylation product [R₃Si? CH?C? R]⁺. Thus, acetone acts as a silane shuttle by transferring the silyl moiety from the silane to the alkyne. Finally, nucleophilic attack of the hydrido ligand over [R₃Si? CH?C? R]⁺ affords selectively the β‐(Z)‐vinylsilane. The β‐Z selectivity is explained on the grounds of the steric interaction between the silyl moiety and the ligand system resulting from the geometry of the approach that leads to β‐(E)‐vinylsilanes.     

Silyl‐Phosphino‐Carbene Complexes of Uranium(IV)

Unprecedented silyl‐phosphino‐carbene complexes of uranium(IV) are presented, where before all covalent actinide–carbon double bonds were stabilised by phosphorus(V) substituents or restricted to matrix isolation experiments. Conversion of [U(BIPM^TMS)(Cl)(μ‐Cl)₂Li(THF)₂] ( 1 , BIPM^TMS=C(PPh₂NSiMe₃)₂) into [U(BIPM^TMS)(Cl){CH(Ph)(SiMe₃)}] ( 2 ), and addition of [Li{CH(SiMe₃)(PPh₂)}(THF)]/Me₂NCH₂CH₂NMe₂ (TMEDA) gave [U{C(SiMe₃)(PPh₂)}(BIPM^TMS)(μ‐Cl)Li(TMEDA)(μ‐TMEDA)_0.5]₂ ( 3 ) by α‐hydrogen abstraction. Addition of 2,2,2‐cryptand or two equivalents of 4‐N,N‐dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to 3 gave [U{C(SiMe₃)(PPh₂)}(BIPM^TMS)(Cl)][Li(2,2,2‐cryptand)] ( 4 ) or [U{C(SiMe₃)(PPh₂)}(BIPM^TMS)(DMAP)₂] ( 5 ). The characterisation data for 3 – 5 suggest that whilst there is evidence for 3‐centre P?C?U π‐bonding character, the U=C double bond component is dominant in each case. These U=C bonds are the closest to a true uranium alkylidene yet outside of matrix isolation experiments.     

Rare‐Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes with 3‐Arylamido‐Functionalized Indolyl Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization and Reactivity†

A series of dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes {[μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐( L NCH)(CH₂SiMe₃)Ind]RE(CH₂SiMe₃)(THF)}₂ ( L ¹ = 2‐^tBuC₆H₄, RE = Y, Gd, Dy, Er, Yb; L ² = 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂, RE = Dy, Er; Ind = indolyl) and {[μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐( L NCH₂)Ind]RE(CH₂SiMe₃)(THF)}₂ ( L ¹, RE = Y, Dy, Er, Yb; L ², RE = Er, Yb) bearing 3‐arylamido functionalized indolyl ligands having diverse bonding modes with metal ions were synthesized either by the insertion reaction of the imino group to the RE—C bond or by the alkane elimination reaction. In the preparation of above complexes, rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes [μ‐η⁵:η¹:η¹‐3‐( L ²NCH)(CH₂SiMe₃)Ind]Gd(CH₂SiMe₃)(THF)}₂ with a μ‐η⁵:η¹:η¹ coordination mode to the gadolinium ion and {[μ‐η³:η¹:η¹‐3‐( L ²NCH₂)Ind]Dy(CH₂SiMe₃)(THF)}₂ with a μ‐η³:η¹:η¹ coordination mode to the dysprosium ion were unexpectedly isolated. The reactions of 3‐( L ²N=CH)Ind with Er(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ at room temperature, generated a tetranuclear imino‐indolyl erbium intermediate {[μ‐η¹:η¹‐3‐( L ²N=CH)Ind]Er(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)}₄, which can transform into the amido functionalized indolyl erbium complex in hot toluene. Moreover, the reactivities of the newly synthesized ytterbium complex with N‐heterocyclic compounds were investigated, affording the corresponding products of the mixed pyridyl‐indolyl, imidazolyl‐indolyl, and ortho‐metalated complexes. The yttrium complexes showed a high regioselectivity and steroselectivity for the isoprene polymerization with 1,4‐trans selectivity up to 91.7% and 1,4‐cis selectivity up to 96.1% in the presence of cocatalysts, respectively.     

Tri­benzyl{η5‐[2‐(p‐tolyl)­prop‐2‐yl]­cyclo­penta­dienyl}­zirconium

The title compound, [Zr(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₅H₁₇)], (I), crystallizes from light petroleum with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Whereas in the parent mol­ecule, Zr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CH₂Ph)₃, all three Zr—CH₂Ph angles are equal, in (I), they differ significantly. In spite of their different environments, both independent mol­ecules in (I) exhibit a small, an expected, and a large Zr—CH₂Ph angle. The angles are similar to those of the closely related tri­benzyl­[η⁵‐(benzyl­di­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]­zirconium complex. The smallest Zr—CH₂Ph angle and the consequently relatively short Zr?C_ipso distance are indicative of η²‐bonding of the benzyl group.     

Synthesis and Characterization of a Gold Vinylidene Complex Lacking π‐Conjugated Heteroatoms

Hydride abstraction from the gold (disilyl)ethylacetylide complex [( P )Au{η¹‐C?CSi(Me)₂CH₂CH₂SiMe₂H}] ( P =P(tBu)₂o‐biphenyl) with triphenylcarbenium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate at ?20 °C formed the cationic gold (β,β‐disilyl)vinylidene complex [( P )Au?C?CSi(Me)₂CH₂CH₂Si (Me)₂]⁺B(C₆F₅)₄^? with ≥90 % selectivity. ²⁹Si NMR analysis of this complex pointed to delocalization of positive charge onto both the β‐silyl groups and the ( P )Au fragment. The C1 and C2 carbon atoms of the vinylidene complex underwent facile interconversion (ΔG^≠=9.7 kcal mol^?1), presumably via the gold π‐disilacyclohexyne intermediate [( P )Au{η²‐C?CSi(Me)₂CH₂CH₂Si (Me)₂}]⁺B(C₆F₅)₄^?.     

The Counterion Effect on the Assembly of Coordination Networks of Cationic (η3‐Allyl)palladium Complexes Containing 3,5‐Dimethyl‐4‐nitro‐1H‐pyrazole

Two new (η³‐allyl)palladium complexes containing the ligand 3,5‐dimethyl‐4‐nitro‐1H‐pyrazole (Hdmnpz) were synthesized and characterized as [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)(Hdmnpz)₂]BF₄ ( 1 ) and [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)(Hdmnpz)₂]NO₃ ( 2 ). The structures of these compounds were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction to evaluate the intermolecular assembly. Each complex exhibits similar coordination behavior consistent with cationic entities comprised of two pyrazole ligands coordinated with the [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)]⁺ fragment in an almost square‐planar coordination geometry. In 1 , the cationic entities are propagated through strong intermolecular H‐bonds formed between the pyrazole NH groups and BF ions in one‐dimensional polymer chains along the a axis. These chains are extended into two‐dimensional sheet networks via bifurcated H‐bonds. New intermolecular interactions established between NO₂ and Me substituents at the pyrazole ligand of neighboring sheets give rise to a three‐dimensional network. By contrast, compound 2 presents molecular cyclic dimers formed through N? H???O H‐bonds between two NO counterions and the pyrazole NH groups of two cationic entities. The dimers are also connected to each other through C? H???O H‐bonds between the remaining O‐atom of each NO ion and the allyl CH₂ H‐atom. Those interactions expand in a layer which lies parallel to the face (101).     

Direct functionalization of polyisobutylene by living initiation with α‐methylstyrene epoxide

This article describes the synthesis and characterization of polyisobutylene (PIB) carrying one primary hydroxyl head group and a tertiary chloride end group, [Ph? C(CH₃)(CH₂OH)–PIB–CH₂? C(CH₃)₂Cl] prepared with direct functionalization via initiation. The polymerization of isobutylene was initiated with the α‐methylstyrene epoxide/titanium tetrachloride system. Living conditions were obtained from ?75 to ?50 °C (198–223 K). Low molecular weight samples (number‐average molecular weight ～ 4000 g/mol) were prepared under suitable conditions and characterized by Fourier transform infrared and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The presence of primary hydroxyl head groups in PIB was verified by both methods. Quantitative Fourier transform infrared with 2‐phenyl‐1‐propanol calibration and ¹H NMR performed on both the hydroxyl‐functionalized PIB and its reaction product with trimethylchlorosilane showed that each polymer chain carried one primary hydroxyl head group. The synthetic methodology presented here is an effective and simple route for the direct functionalization of PIB. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 1005–1015, 2002     

Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

α‐keto‐β‐diimine nickel‐catalyzed olefin polymerization: Effect of ortho‐aryl substituents and preparation of stereoblock copolymers

A series of α‐keto‐β‐diimine nickel complexes (Ar‐N = C(CH₃)‐C(O)‐C(CH₃)=N‐Ar)NiBr₂; Ar = 2,6‐R‐C₆H₃‐, R = Me, Et, iPr, and Ar = 2,4,6‐Me₃‐C₆H₃‐) was prepared. All corresponding ligands are unstable even under an inert atmosphere and in a freezer. Stable copper complex intermediates of ligand synthesis and ethyl substituted nickel complex were isolated and characterized by X‐ray. All nickel complexes were used for the polymerization of ethene, propylene, and hex‐1‐ene to investigate their livingness and the extent of chain‐walking. Low‐temperature propene polymerization with less bulky ortho‐substituents was less isospecific than the one with isopropyl derivative. Propene stereoblock copolymers were prepared by iPr derivative combining the polymerization at low temperature to prepare isotactic polypropylene (PP) block and at a higher temperature, supporting chain‐walking, to obtain amorphous regioirregular PP block. Alternatively, a copolymerization of propene with ethene was used for the preparation of amorphous block. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 2440–2449     

Synthesis of long‐chain‐branched polyethylene by ethylene homopolymerization with a novel nickel(II) α‐diimine catalyst

Long‐chain‐branched polyethylene with a broad or bimodal molecular weight distribution was synthesized by ethylene homopolymerization via a novel nickel(II) α‐diimine complex of 2,3‐bis(2‐phenylphenyl)butane diimine nickel dibromide ({[2‐C₆H₄(C₆H₅)]? N?C? (CH₃)C(CH₃)?N? [2‐C₆H₄(C₆H₅)]}NiBr₂) that possessed two stereoisomers in the presence of modified methylaluminoxane. The influences of the polymerization conditions, including the temperature and Al/Ni molar ratio, on the catalytic activity, molecular weight and molecular weight distribution, degree of branching, and branch length of polyethylene, were investigated. The resultant products were confirmed by gel permeation chromatography, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and ¹³C NMR characterization to be composed of higher molecular weight polyethylene with only isolated long‐branched chains (longer than six carbons) or with methyl pendant groups and oligomers of linear α‐olefins. The long‐chain‐branched polyethylene was formed mainly through the copolymerization of ethylene growing chains and macromonomers of α‐olefins. The presence of methyl pendant groups in the polyethylene main chain implied a 2,1‐insertion of the macromonomers into [Ni]? H active species. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 1325–1330, 2005     

Reactivity Studies of η5‐ Indenyl and η5‐Cp* Ruthenium(II) Complexes towards some Polypyridyl Ligands

The reaction of [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], where; L³ = C₉H₇ ( 1 ), C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ( 2 ) with acetonitrile in the presence of [NH₄][PF₆] yielded cationic complexes [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆]; L³= C₉H₇ ([3]PF₆) and L³ = C₅Me₅ ([4]PF₆), respectively. Complexes [3]PF₆ and [4]PF₆ reacts with some polypyridyl ligands viz, 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) pyrazine (bpp), 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) quinoxaline (bpq) yielding the complexes of the formulation [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)(L²)]PF₆ where; L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpp, ([5]PF₆), L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpq, ([6]PF₆); L³ = C₅Me₅, L² = bpp, ([7]PF₆) and bpq, ([8]PF₆), respectively. However reaction of [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆] ([3]PF₆) with the sterically demanding polypyridyl ligands, viz. 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tptz) or tetra‐2‐pyridyl‐1,4‐pyrazine (tppz) leads to the formation of unexpected complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂; L² = tppz ([9](PF₆)₂), tptz ([11](PF₆)₂) and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)Cl][PF₆]; L² = tppz ([10]PF₆), tptz ([12]PF₆). The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. They have been characterized on the basis of micro analytical and spectroscopic data. The crystal structures of the representative complexes were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Reactions of Cyclohexyl Isocyanide with η5‐Substituted Cyclo‐pentadienyl MoMo Triply Bonded Complexes. Crystal Structure of [Mo(CO)2(η5‐C5H4CO2CH3)]2(μ‐η2‐CNC6H11)

Reactions of one or two equiv. of cyclohexyl isocyanide in THF at room temperature with Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) gave the isocyanide coordinated Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes with functionally substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands, [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂(μ‐η²‐CNC₆H₁₁) ( 1a , R=COCH₃; 1b , R=CO₂CH₃) and [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)(CNC₆H₁₁)]₂ ( 2a , R=COCH₃; 2b , R=CO₂CH₃), respectively. Complexes 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b could be more conveniently prepared by thermal decarbonylation of Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in toluene at reflux, followed by treatment of the resulting Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in situ with cyclohexyl isocyanide. While 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b were characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopy, 1b was further characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthese und strukturelle Studien von Aluminiumdialkylaminen und ‐amiden: N‐Chiralität von (CH3)3AlNHRR′ und cis‐trans‐Isomerie an X2AlNRR′ (X = CH3, Cl,H)

Synthesis and Structural Studies of Aluminum Dialkylamines and Dialkylamides: N‐Chirality of (CH₃)₃AlNHRR′ and cis‐trans ‐Isomerism at X₂AlNRR′ (X = CH₃, Cl, H) Aluminum dialkylamines and dialkylamides were prepared from Al(CH₃)₃ and NH(CH₃)R′ (R′: –C₂H₅, –^tC₄H₉) and characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ²⁷Al‐NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of [(CH₃)₂AlN(CH₃)(–^tC₄H₉)]₂ ( IV ), [Cl₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]₂ ( V ), and [H₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]_∞ ( VI‐trans and VI‐cis ) are discussed.