Synthesis and Spectroscopic Studies of Arylethynylsilanes

A variety of arylethynylsilanes (Ar‐C?C? C₆H₄? C?C)_nSiMe_4?n were prepared successfully by reaction of the corresponding chlorosilanes Me_4?nSiCl_n with Ar? C?C? C₆H₄? C?CM (M=Li, MgBr), which was prepared by treatment of ethynyl(diarylethyne)s Ar? C?C? C₆H₄? C?CH with BuLi or MeMgBr. The ethynyl(diarylethyne)s were readily prepared in good yields by the double‐elimination method: addition of lithium hexamethyldisilazide to a mixture of ArCH₂SO₂Ph, TMS? C?C? C₆H₄? CHO, and ClP(O)(OEt)₂, followed by desilylation. In the tetrakis(arylethynyl)silanes (Ar? C?C? C₆H₄? C?C)₄Si thus prepared, through‐space conjugation of four triple bonds on the silicon atom emerges as a result of participation of the silicon orbitals in the acetylenic π orbitals. This participation enhances the emissive quantum yields of arylethynylsilanes with an increase in the number of arylethynyl moieties on silicon: quantum yields of emission (Φ_F) of 0.72 for (MeOC₆H₄? C?C? C₆H₄? C?C)₄Si, 0.53 for (MeOC₆H₄? C?C? C₆H₄? C?C)₂SiMe₂, and 0.47 for MeO‐C₆H₄? C?C? C₆H₄? C?CSiMe₃ were obtained. Although this enhancement effect was also observed in the phenylethynylarylsilane (MeOC₆H₄? C?C? C₆H₄)₂SiMe₂, the bis(arylethynyl)disilane (MeOC₆H₄? C?C? C₆H₄? C?C‐SiMe₂)₂ exhibited non‐enhanced emission.     

Versatile Conversion of N‐Heterocyclic Silylene to Silyl Metal Compounds by Insertion of Divalent Silicon into Metal–Carbon and Metal–Hydrogen Bonds

The facile one‐pot reaction of the stable N‐heterocyclic silylene LSi: 1 (L?(ArN)C(?CH₂) CH?C(Me)(NAr), Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with Me₂Zn, Me₃Al, H₃Al‐NMe₃, and MeLi has been investigated. The silicon(II) atom in 1 is capable of insertion into the corresponding M? C and Al? H bonds under very mild reaction conditions. Thus, Me₂Zn furnishes the bis(silyl) zinc complex LSi(Me)ZnSi(Me)L 2 as the sole product, irrespective of the molar ratio of the starting materials applied. Moreover, the reactions of 1 with Me₃Al, H₃Al‐NMe₃, and MeLi lead directly to the 1,1‐addition products LSi(Me)(Al(thf)Me₂) 3 , LSi(H)(AlH₂(NMe₃)) 4 , and LSi(Me)Li(thf)₃ 5 , respectively. All new compounds 2 – 5 were fully characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analyses, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

[2+4] and [2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions of N‐Sulfinyl Carboxylic Acid Amides with (CF3)2BNMe2. Crystal Structure of cyclo‐(CF3)2B‐NMe2‐S(=O)‐N=C(p‐CH3C6H4)‐O

N‐sulfinylacylamides R‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with (CF₃)₂BNMe₂ ( 1 ) to form, by [2+4] cycloaddition, six‐membered rings cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(R)‐O for R = Me ( 2 ), t‐Bu ( 3 ), C₆H₅ ( 4 ), and p‐CH₃C₆H₄ ( 5 ) while N‐sulfinylcarbamic acid esters R‐O‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with 1 to yield mixtures of six‐membered (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(OR)‐O) and four‐membered rings (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N(C=O)OR) for R = Me ( 6 and 9 ), Et ( 7 and 10 ), and C₆H₅ ( 8 and 11 ). The structure of 5 has been determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthesis and Characterization of m‐Terphenyl (1,3‐Diphenylbenzene) Compounds Containing Trifluoromethyl Groups

The bis(silyl)triazene compound 2,6‐(Me₃Si)₂‐4‐Me‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ ( 4 ) was synthesized by double lithiation/silylation of 2,6‐Br₂‐4‐Me‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ ( 1 ). Furthermore, 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂‐C₆H₃]‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ derivative 6 can be easily synthesized by a C,C‐bond formation reaction of 1 with the corresponding aryl‐Grignard reagent, i.e., 3,5‐bis[(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]magnesium bromide. Reactions of compound 4 with KI and 6 with I₂ afforded in good yields novel phenyl derivatives, 2,6‐(Me₃Si)₂‐4‐MeC₆H₂? I and 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂? C₆H₃]‐4‐MeC₆H₂? I ( 5 and 7 , resp.). On the other hand, the analogous m‐terphenyl 1,3‐diphenylbenzene compound 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂? C₆H₃]C₆H₃? I ( 8 ) could be obtained in moderate yield from the reaction of (2,6‐dichlorophenyl)lithium and 2 equiv. of aryl‐Grignard reagent, followed by the reaction with I₂. Different attempts to introduce the ^tBu (Me₃C) or neophyl (PhC(Me)₂CH₂) substituents in the central ring were unsuccessful. All the compounds were fully characterized by elemental analysis, melting point, IR and NMR spectroscopy. The structure of compound 6 was corroborated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction measurements.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Fluxionality of Strained Hypercoordinate Silicon‐Bridged [1]Ferrocenophanes

The first hypercoordinate sila[1]ferrocenophanes [fcSiMe(2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂)] ( 5 a ) and [fcSi(CH₂Cl)(2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂)] ( 5 b ) (fc=(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)) were synthesized by low‐temperature (?78 °C) reactions of Li[2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂] with the appropriate chlorinated sila[1]ferrocenophanes ([fcSiMeCl] ( 1 a ) and [fcSi(CH₂Cl)Cl] ( 1 d ), respectively). Single‐crystal Xray diffraction studies revealed pseudo‐trigonal bipyramidal structures for both 5 a and 5 b , with one of the shortest reported Si???N distances for an sp³‐hybridized nitrogen atom interacting with a tetraorganosilane detected for 5 a (2.776(2) Å). Elongated Si? C_ipso bonds trans to the donating NMe₂ arms (1.919(2) and 1.909(2) Å for 5 a and 5 b , respectively) were observed relative to both the non‐trans bonds ( 5 a : 1.891(2); 5 b : 1.879(2) Å) and the Si? C_ipso bonds of the non‐hypercoordinate analogues ([fcSiMePh] ( 1 b ): 1.879(4), 1.880(4) Å; [fcSi(CH₂Cl)Ph] ( 1 e ): 1.881(2), 1.884(2)). Solution‐state fluxionality of 5 a and 5 b , suggestive of reversible coordination of the NMe₂ group to silicon, was demonstrated by means of variable‐temperature NMR studies. The ΔG^≠ of the fluxional processes for 5 a and 5 b in CD₂Cl₂ were estimated to be 35.0 and 37.6 kJ mol^?1, respectively (35.8 and 38.3 kJ mol^?1 in [D₈]toluene). The quaternization of 5 a and 5 b by MeOTf, to give [fcSiMe(2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₃)][OTf] ( 7 a‐ OTf) and [fcSi(CH₂Cl)(2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₃)][OTf] ( 7 b‐ OTf), respectively, supported the reversibility of NMe₂ coordination at the silicon center as the source of fluxionality for 5 a and 5 b . Surprisingly, low room‐temperature stability was detected for 5 b due to its tendency to intramolecularly cyclize and form the spirocyclic [fcSi(cyclo‐CH₂NMe₂CH₂C₆H₄)]Cl ( 9 ‐Cl). This process was observed in both solution and the solid state, and isolation and Xray characterization of 9 ‐Cl was achieved. The model compound, [Fc₂Si(2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂)₂] ( 8 ), synthesized through reaction of [Fc₂SiCl₂] with two equivalents of Li[2‐C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂] at ?78 °C, showed a lack of hypercoordination in both the solid state and in solution (down to ?80 °C). This suggests that either the reduced steric hindrance around Si or the unique electronics of the strained sila[1]ferrocenophanes is necessary for hypercoordination to occur.     

Gemischte Sandwichkomplexe der 4 f‐Elemente: Enantiomerenreine Cyclooctatetraenyl‐Cyclopentadienyl‐Komplexe des Samariums und Lutetiums mit donorfunktionalisierten Cyclopentadienylliganden

Organometallic Compounds of the Lanthanides. 139 Mixed Sandwich Complexes of the 4 f Elements: Enantiomerically Pure Cyclooctatetraenyl Cyclopentadienyl Complexes of Samarium and Lutetium with Donor‐Functionalized Cyclopentadienyl Ligands The reactions of [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}], [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] and [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] with the cyclooctatetraenyl lanthanide chlorides [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln(μ‐Cl)(THF)]₂ (Ln = Sm, Lu) yield the mixed cyclooctatetraenyl cyclopentadienyl lanthanide complexes [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Sm{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}] ( 1 a ), [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 2 a ), Lu ( 2 b )) and [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 3 a ), Lu ( 3 b )). For comparison, the achiral compounds [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 4 a ), Lu ( 4 b )) are synthesized in an analogous manner. ¹H‐, ¹³C‐NMR‐, and mass spectra of all new compounds as well as the X‐ray crystal structures of 3 b and 4 b are discussed.     

A Gallium‐Substituted Distibene and an Antimony‐Analogue Bicyclo[1.1.0]butane: Synthesis and Solid‐State Structures

RGa {R=HC[C(Me)N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)]₂} reacts with Sb(NMe₂)₃ with insertion into the Sb? N bond and elimination of RGa(NMe₂)₂ ( 2 ), yielding the Ga‐substituted distibene R(Me₂N)GaSb?SbGa(NMe₂)R ( 1 ). Thermolysis of 1 proceeded with elimination of RGa and 2 and subsequent formation of the bicyclo[1.1.0]butane analogue [R(Me₂N)Ga]₂Sb₄ ( 3 ).     

Synthesis,Interionic Structure,and Reactivity toward CO and p‐Methylstyrene of Palladacyclic Compounds Bearing α‐Diimine Ligands

Palladacyclic compounds [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] (R = Et, ⁱPr, 2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃; N? N = bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dialkylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes; [X]^? = [BF₄]^? or [PF₆]^?) were synthesized from the dimers [{Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and N? N ligands. Their interionic structure in CD₂Cl₂ was determined by means of ¹⁹F,¹H‐HOESY experiments and compared with that in the solid state derived from X‐ray single‐crystal studies. [Pd(C₆H₄(C₆H₅C?O)C?N? R)(N? N)] [X] complexes were found to copolymerize CO and p‐methylstyrene affording syndiotactic or isotactic copolymers when bpy or 1,4‐(o,o′‐dimethylaryl)‐1,4‐diazabuta‐1,3‐dienes were used, respectively. The reactions with CO and p‐methylstyrene of the bpy derivatives were investigated. Two intermediates derived from a single and a double insertion of CO into the Pd? C bonds were isolated and completely characterized in solution.     

Calcium-mediated dearomatization, C-H bond activation, and allylation of alkylated and benzannulated pyridine derivatives

A facile and general synthetic pathway for the production of dearomatized, allylated, and C? H bond activated pyridine derivatives is presented. Reaction of the corresponding derivative with the previously reported reagent bis(allyl)calcium, [Ca(C₃H₅)₂] ( 1 ), cleanly affords the product in high yield. The range of N‐heterocyclic compounds studied comprised 2‐picoline ( 2 ), 4‐picoline ( 3 ), 2,6‐lutidine ( 4 ), 4‐tert‐butylpyridine ( 5 ), 2,2′‐bipyridine ( 6 ), acridine ( 7 ), quinoline ( 8 ), and isoquinoline ( 9 ). Depending on the substitution pattern of the pyridine derivative, either carbometalation or C? H bond activation products are obtained. In the absence of methyl groups ortho or para to the nitrogen atom, carbometalation leads to dearomatized products. C(sp³)? H bond activation occurs at ortho and para situated methyl groups. Steric shielding of the 4‐position in pyridine yields the ring‐metalated product through C(sp²)? H bond activation instead. The isolated compounds [Ca(2‐CH₂‐C₅H₄N)₂(THF)] ( 2 b ?(THF)), [Ca(4‐CH₂‐C₅H₄N)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 b ?(THF)₂), [Ca(2‐CH₂‐C₅H₃N‐6‐CH₃)₂(THF)_n] ( 4 b ?(THF)_n; n=0, 0.75), [Ca{2‐C₅H₃N‐4‐C(CH₃)₃}₂(THF)₂] ( 5 c ?(THF)₂), [Ca{4,4′‐(C₃H₅)₂‐(C₁₀H₈N₂)}(THF)] ( 6 a ?(THF)), [Ca(NC₁₃H₉‐9‐C₃H₅)₂(THF)] ( 7 a ?(THF)), [Ca(4‐C₃H₅‐C₉H₇N)₂(THF)] ( 8 b ?(THF)), and [Ca(1‐C₃H₅‐C₉H₇N)₂(THF)₃] ( 9 a ?(THF)₃) have been characterized by NMR spectroscopy and metal analysis. 9 a ?(THF)₄ and 4 b ?(THF)₃ were additionally characterized in the solid state by X‐ray diffraction experiments. 4 b ?(THF)₃ shows an aza‐allyl coordination mode in the solid state. Based on the results, mechanistic aspects are discussed in the context of previous findings.     

pH‐Controlled Molecular Switches and the Substrate‐Directed Self‐Assembly of Molecular Capsules with a Calix[4]pyrrole Derivative

10α,20α‐Bis(4‐nitrophenyl)calix[4]pyrrole ( 1 ) forms 1:1 complexes with anions of selected aromatic hydroxy acids in which the host orientation within the guest is controlled by a change in the pH value. Some bis‐anionic guests, including those obtained from 4‐hydroxybenzoic acid, 1,4‐ and 1,3‐benzenedicarboxylic acids, induce the self‐assembly of molecular capsules involving two molecules of the receptor. ¹H NMR data and solid‐state structures of the 1:1 complex of 1 with p‐C₆H₄(COOH)(COO^?)⁺NMe₄ and the 2:1 capsule [( 1 )₂m‐C₆H₄(COO^?)₂(⁺NMe₄)₂] provide structural details in solution and in the solid state.     

Nitro‐substituted iron(II) tridentate bis(imino)pyridine complexes as high‐temperature catalysts for the production of α‐olefins

A new series of nitro‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligands {2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, 2,6‐bis[1‐(4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, (1‐{6‐[1‐(4‐nitro‐phenylimino)‐ethyl]‐pyridin‐2‐yl}‐ethylidene)‐(2,4,6‐trimethyl‐phenyl)‐amine, and 2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐3‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine} and their corresponding Fe(II) complexes [{p‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐ Me? p‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 10 ), L₂FeCl₂ ( 11 ), {m‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? m‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 12 ), and {p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Mes}FeCl₂ ( 14 )] were synthesized. According to X‐ray analysis, there were shortenings of the axial Fe? N bond lengths (up to 0.014 Å) in para‐nitro‐substituted complex 10 and (up to 0.015 Å) in meta‐nitro‐substituted complex 12 versus the Fe(II) complex without nitro groups [{o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me}FeCl₂ ( 1 )]. Complexes 10 , 12 , and 14 afforded very active catalysts for the production of α‐olefins and were more temperature‐stable and had longer lifetimes than parent non‐nitro‐substituted Fe(II) complex 1 . The reaction between FeCl₂ and a sterically less hindered ligand [p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? p‐NO₂] resulted in the formation of octahedral complex 11 . A para‐dialkylamino‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligand [p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂] and the corresponding Fe(II) complex [{p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂}FeCl₂ ( 16 )] were synthesized to evaluate the effect of enhanced electron donation of the ligand on the catalytic performance. According to X‐ray analysis, there was a shortening (up to 0.043 Å) of the axial Fe? N bond lengths in para‐diethylamino‐substituted complex 16 in comparison with parent Fe(II) complex 1 . © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 2615–2635, 2006     

Electronically Strongly Coupled Divinylheterocyclic‐Bridged Diruthenium Complexes

Complexes [{Ru(CO)Cl(PiPr₃)₂}₂(μ‐2,5‐(CH?CH)₂‐^cC₄H₂E] (E=NR; R=C₆H₄‐4‐NMe₂ ( 10 a ), C₆H₄‐4‐OMe ( 10 b ), C₆H₄‐4‐Me ( 10 c ), C₆H₅ ( 10 d ), C₆H₄‐4‐CO₂Et ( 10 e ), C₆H₄‐4‐NO₂ ( 10 f ), C₆H₃‐3,5‐(CF₃)₂ ( 10 g ), CH₃ ( 11 ); E=O ( 12 ), S ( 13 )) are discussed. The solid state structures of four alkynes and two complexes are reported. (Spectro)electrochemical studies show a moderate influence of the nature of the heteroatom and the electron‐donating or ‐withdrawing substituents R in 10 a – g on the electrochemical and spectroscopic properties. The CVs display two consecutive one‐electron redox events with ΔE°′=350–495 mV. A linear relationship between ΔE°′ and the σ_p Hammett constant for 10 a–f was found. IR, UV/Vis/NIR and EPR studies for 10 ⁺– 13 ⁺ confirm full charge delocalization over the {Ru}CH?CH‐heterocycle‐CH?CH{Ru} backbone, classifying them as Class III systems according to the Robin and Day classification. DFT‐optimized structures of the neutral complexes agree well with the experimental ones and provide insight into the structural consequences of stepwise oxidations.     

Insight into Oxide‐Bridged Heterobimetallic Al/Zr Olefin Polymerization Catalysts

Reaction of (TBBP)AlMe ? THF with [Cp*₂Zr(Me)OH] gave [(TBBP)Al(THF)?O?Zr(Me)Cp*₂] (TBBP=3,3’,5,5’‐tetra‐tBu‐2,2'‐biphenolato). Reaction of [DIPPnacnacAl(Me)?O?Zr(Me)Cp₂] with [PhMe₂NH]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? gave a cationic Al/Zr complex that could be structurally characterized as its THF adduct [(DIPPnacnac)Al(Me)?O?Zr(THF)Cp₂]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? (DIPPnacnac=HC[(Me)C=N(2,6‐iPr₂?C₆H₃)]₂). The first complex polymerizes ethene in the presence of an alkylaluminum scavenger but in the absence of methylalumoxane (MAO). The adduct cation is inactive under these conditions. Theoretical calculations show very high energy barriers (ΔG=40–47 kcal mol^?1) for ethene insertion with a bridged AlOZr catalyst. This is due to an unfavorable six‐membered‐ring transition state, in which the methyl group bridges the metal and ethene with an obtuse metal‐Me‐C angle that prevents synchronized bond‐breaking and making. A more‐likely pathway is dissociation of the Al‐O‐Zr complex into an aluminate and the active polymerization catalyst [Cp*₂ZrMe]⁺.     

The Synthesis of Functionalised Diaryltetraynes and Their Transport Properties in Single‐Molecule Junctions

The synthesis and characterisation is described of six diaryltetrayne derivatives [Ar‐(C?C)₄‐Ar] with Ar=4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄‐ ( NO₂4 ), 4‐NH(Me)C₆H₄‐ ( NHMe4 ), 4‐NMe₂C₆H₄‐ ( NMe₂4 ), 4‐NH₂‐(2,6‐dimethyl)C₆H₄‐ ( DMeNH₂4 ), 5‐indolyl ( IN4 ) and 5‐benzothienyl ( BTh4 ). X‐ray molecular structures are reported for NO₂4 , NHMe4 , DMeNH₂4 , IN4 and BTh4 . The stability of the tetraynes has been assessed under ambient laboratory conditions (20 °C, daylight and in air): NO₂4 and BTh4 are stable for at least six months without observable decomposition, whereas NHMe4 , NMe₂4 , DMeNH₂4 and IN4 decompose within a few hours or days. The derivative DMeNH₂4 , with ortho‐methyl groups partially shielding the tetrayne backbone, is considerably more stable than the parent compound with Ar=4‐NH₂C₆H₄ ( NH₂4 ). The ability of the stable tetraynes to anchor in Au|molecule|Au junctions is reported. Scanning‐tunnelling‐microscopy break junction (STM‐BJ) and mechanically controllable break junction (MCBJ) techniques are employed to investigate single‐molecule conductance characteristics.     

Synthesis and characterization of novel chelated dimethylamino lithium alkoxides: molecular structures of [1‐LiOC(C6H11)2‐2‐NMe2C6H4]2 and [1‐LiOCPh2CH2‐2‐NMe2C6H4]2

From the reaction of 1‐HOCPh₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ), 1‐HOC(C₆H₁₁)₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄ ( 2 ) and 1‐HOCPh₂CH₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄ ( 3 ) with n‐BuLi in diethyl ether, the solvent‐free chelated dimethylamino lithium alkoxides [1‐LiOCPh₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄]₂ ( 4 ), [1‐LiOC(C₆H₁₁)₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄]₂ ( 5 ) and [1‐LiOCPh₂CH₂‐2‐NMe₂C₆H₄]₂ ( 6 ) were obtained. The lithium alkoxides 4 – 6 were characterized by ¹H, ⁷Li, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Crystal structure determinations of 5 and 6 were carried out. Compounds 5 and 6 are examples of structurally characterized solvent‐free chelated dimethylamino lithium alkoxides and 6 is a rare example of this type containing a seven‐membered ring. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Formation of Organolithium Hetero‐Aggregates [Li4Ar2(nBu)2] (Ar=C6H4CH(Me)NMe2‐2) during the Directed ortho‐Lithiation of [1‐(Dimethylamino)ethyl]benzene

(R)‐[1‐(Dimethylamino)ethyl]benzene reacts with nBuLi in a 1:1 molar ratio in pentane to quantitatively yield a unique hetero‐aggregate ( 2 a ) containing the lithiated arene, unreacted nBuLi, and the complexed parent arene in a 1:1:1 ratio. As a model compound, [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂] ( 2 b ) was prepared from the quantitative redistribution reaction of the parent lithiated arene Li(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2) with nBuLi in a 1:1 molar ratio. The mono‐Et₂O adduct [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂(OEt₂)] ( 2 c ) and the bis‐Et₂O adduct [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂(OEt₂)₂] ( 2 d ) were obtained by re‐crystallization of 2 b from pentane/Et₂O and pure Et₂O, respectively. The single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations of 2 b – d show that the overall structural motifs of all three derivatives are closely related. They are all tetranuclear Li aggregates in which the four Li atoms are arranged in an almost regular tetrahedron. These structures can be described as consisting of two linked dimeric units: one Li₂Ar₂ dimer and a hypothetical Li₂nBu₂ dimer. The stereochemical aspects of the chiral Li₂Ar₂ fragment are discussed. The structures as observed in the solid state are apparently retained in solution as revealed by a combination of cryoscopy and ¹H, ¹³C, and ⁶Li NMR spectroscopy.     

Synthetic,Mechanistic, and Theoretical Studies on the Generation of Iridium Hydride Alkylidene and Iridium Hydride Alkene Isomers

Experimental and theoretical studies on equilibria between iridium hydride alkylidene structures, [(Tp^Me2)Ir(H){?C(CH₂R)ArO }] (Tp^Me2=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate; R=H, Me; Ar=substituted C₆H₄ group), and their corresponding hydride olefin isomers, [(Tp^Me2)Ir(H){R(H)C? C(H)OAr}], have been carried out. Compounds of these types are obtained either by reaction of the unsaturated fragment [(Tp^Me2)Ir(C₆H₅)₂] with o‐C₆H₄(OH)CH₂R, or with the substituted anisoles 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃OMe, 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂OMe, and 4‐Br‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₂OMe. The reactions with the substituted anisoles require not only multiple C? H bond activation but also cleavage of the Me? OAr bond and the reversible formation of a C? C bond (as revealed by ¹³C labeling studies). Equilibria between the two tautomeric structures of these complexes were achieved by prolonged heating at temperatures between 100 and 140 °C, with interconversion of isomeric complexes requiring inversion of the metal configuration, as well as the expected migratory insertion and hydrogen‐elimination reactions. This proposal is supported by a detailed computational exploration of the mechanism at the quantum mechanics (QM) level in the real system. For all compounds investigated, the equilibria favor the alkylidene structure over the olefinic isomer by a factor of between approximately 1 and 25. Calculations demonstrate that the main reason for this preference is the strong Ir–carbene interactions in the carbene isomers, rather than steric destabilization of the olefinic tautomers.     

Hydrazinocarben-Metallkomplexe—synthese aus allenylidenkomplexen und hydrazinen, umlagerung und cyclisierung

The diarylallenylidene pentacarbonyl complexes (CO)₅M=C=C=C(C₆H₄NMe₂-p)₂ (M = W (1), Cr (2)) add 1,2,-disubstituted hydrazines RNH-HNR to form alkenyl hydrazino carbene complexes (CO)₅M=C(C(H)=C(C₆H₄NMe₂-p)₂) NR-N(H)R (M = W, R = Bn (3b), ⁱPr (3c), ^cHex (3d); M = Cr, R = Me (4a), ⁱPr (4b)) in good yield. 3c and 4b are formed selectively as E-conformers (E arrangement of N_βHR and (CO)₅M with respect to the C(carbene)-N_α bond). In contrast, all other derivatives of 3 and 4 are obtained as a mixture of E/Z-isomers. On heating, E-3a and E-3b rearrange to give the acrylamidine complexes (CO)₅W-NR=C(NHR)C(H)=C(C₆H₄NMe₂-p)₂ (R = Me (5a), Bn (5b). The structure of complex 5b was established by X-ray analysis. Acid-catalyzed, the alkenyl hydrazino carbene complexes E-3a, E-3b and 3c are transformed by intramolecular cyclization into the pyrazolidinylidene complexes

Full-size image

(R =Me (6a), Bn (6b), ⁱPr (6c)).

Zusammenfassung

Die Diarylallenyliden(pentacarbonyl)komplexe (CO)₅M=C=C=C(C₆H₄NMe₂-p)₂ (M = W (1), Cr (2)) addieren 1,2-disbustituierte Hydrazine RNH-HNR in guten Ausbeuten zu Alkenylhydrazinocarbenkomplexen (CO)₅M=C(C(H)=C(C₆H₄NMe₂p)₂) NR-N(H)R (M = W, R = Bn (3b), ⁱPr (3c), ^cHex (3d); M = Cr, R =Me(4a), ⁱPr (4b)). 3c und 4b entstehen hierbei selektiv in der E-Konformation (E-Anordnung von N_βHR und (CO)₅M bezülich der C(Carben)-N_α-Bindung). Alle anderen Derivate von 3 und 4 werden dagegen als E/Z-Isomerengemisch gebildet. E-3a und E-3b lagern sich beim Erwärmen in die Acrylamidinkomplexe (CO)₅W-NR=C(NHR)C(H)=C(C₆H₄NMe₂-p)₂ (R = Me (5a), Bn (5b)) um. Die Struktur von 5b wurde anhand einer Röntgenstrukturanalyse gesichert. Säurekatalysiert cyclisieren die Alkenylhydrazinocarbenkomplexe E-3a, E-3b und 3c zu den Pyrazolidinylidenkomplexen

Full-size image

(R = Me (6b), ⁱPr (6c)).     

Acid-catalyzed polycondensation of bisdiazoalkanes

Dimerization reactions of diphenyldiazomethane have been applied to the polycondensation of six bisdiazobenzyl arylenes, namely 1,4- and 1,3-bis(α-diazobenzyl)-benzenes C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₅; 1,4- and 1,3-bis(α-diazo-p-methoxybenzyl)-benzenes, p,p′-MeO? C₆H₄? CN₂? (C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₄? OMe; 4,4′-bis(α-diazobenzyl)-diphenylmethane, C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄CH₂C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₅; and 4,4′-bis(α-diazobenyl)-diphenyl ether, C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄? O? C₆H₄)CN₂C₆H₅. Depending on the nature of the catalysts, polyene-arylenes (? C(Ar)?C(Ar)? C₆H₄)_n, and polyazine-arylenes, (? C(Ar)?N? N? C(Ar)? C₆H₄? )_n, can be obtained selectively by acid-catalyzed decomposition of these bisdiazoalkanes at room temperature. With perchloric acid and with arylsulfonic acids in strong polar media, polyene-arylenes are formed. On the other hand, boron trifluoride and arylsulfonic acids in solvents of low dielectric constant afford polyazine-arylenes. Less selective is the thermal decomposition at 75°C in toluene solution; it gives a polymer containing about 90% azine and 10% olefinic groups. All these polymers are soluble in common solvents. Their molecular weight vary from 3 200 to 5 000, i.e., X?_n from 12 to 20. The polyene-arylenes are very stable and decompose only around 500°C; the polyazine-arylenes are less stable and decompose around 370°C by losing nitrogen.