On “bent” functions

Let P(x) be a function from GF(2ⁿ) to GF(2). P(x) is called “bent” if all Fourier coefficients of (−1)^P(x) are ±1. The polynomial degree of a bent function P(x) is studied, as are the properties of the Fourier transform of (−1)^P(x), and a connection with Hadamard matrices.     

The “Error” in the Indian “Taylor Series Approximation” to the Sine

It has been repeatedly noted, but not discussed in detail, that certain so-called “third-order Taylor series approximations” found in the school of the medieval Keralese mathematician M dhava are inaccurate. That is, these formulas, unlike the other series expansions brilliantly developed by M dhava and his followers, do not correspond exactly to the terms of the power series subsequently discovered in Europe, by whose name they are generally known. We discuss a Sanskrit commentary on these rules that suggests a possible derivation explaining this discrepancy, and in the process re-emphasize that the Keralese work on such series was rooted in geometric approximation rather than in analysis per se. © 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).Es ist mehrfach festgestellt bisher aber nicht ausführlich diskutiert worden, daß einige sogenannte Taylor-reihennäherungswerte dritter Ordnung, die in der mittelalterlichen Schule keralesischen M dhava gefunden werden, ungenau sind. Das heißt, diesc Formeln sind den Termen der Potenzreihe, die später in Europa entwickelt wurde und unter dem Namen Taylorreihe bekannt ist, nicht äquivalent, im Gegensatz zu den anderen Entwicklungen von Reihen, die glänzend von M dhava und seinen Nachfolgern entwickelt werden. Wir behandeln einen Sanskritkommentar zu den Regeln, der eine mögliche Herleitung suggeriert, die diese Diskrepanz erklärt. Dabei betonen wir nochmals, daß die keralesische Arbeit über solche Reihen eher in geometrischen Näherungen als in der Analysis an sich ihre Wurzeln hat. © 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).MSC subject classification: 01A32.     

Non-recursive functions,knots “with thick ropes,” and self-clenching “thick” hyperspheres

We introduce an approach to certain geometric variational problems based on the use of the algorithmic unrecognizability of the n-dimensional sphere for n ≥ 5. Sometimes this approach allows one to prove the existence of infinitely many solutions of a considered variational problem. This recursion-theoretic approach is applied in this paper to a class of functionals on the space of C^1.1-smooth hypersurfaces diffeomorphic to Sⁿ in Rⁿ⁺¹, where n is any fixed number ≥ 5. The simplest of these functionals k_v is defined by the formula k_v(Σⁿ) = (vol(Σⁿ))^1/n/r(Σⁿ), where r(Σⁿ) denotes the radius of injectivity of the normal exponential map for Σⁿ ? Rⁿ+l. We prove the existence of an infinite set of distinct locally minimal values of k_v on the space of C^1.1-smooth topological hyperspheres in Rⁿ⁺¹ for any n ≥ 5. The functional k_v naturally arises when one attempts to generalize knot theory in order to deal with embeddings and isotopies of “thick” circles and, more generally, “thick” spheres into Euclidean spaces. We introduce the notion of knot “with thick rope” types. The theory of knot “with thick rope” types turns out to be quite different from the classical knot theory because of the following result: There exists an infinite set of non-trivial knot “with thick rope” types in codimension one for every dimension greater than or equal to five.     

Holomorphic horospherical duality “sphere-cone”

We describe a construction of complex geometrical analysis which corresponds to the classical theory of spherical harmonics.     

“STRAGEDY” OF THE COMMONS

This paper computes open loop and subgame perfect Nash equilibria for an infinite horizon, common property resource model with congestion and stock externalities. The model permits the comparison of the game-theoretic approach and the traditional commons literature, which preceded the widespread recognition of the games, because the underlying assumptions are equivalent. With access to the commons restricted, the subgame perfect equilibrium captures the inefficiency associated with the strategic scramble to capture the resource reserves the open loop does not. Under sole ownership, the two equilibrium concepts coincide with the surplus maximizing extraction policy. In free access, the extraction strategies under both equilibrium concepts coincide with complete rent dissipation.