Solid‐Phase Synthesis of (Poly)phosphorylated Nucleosides and Conjugates

Succinyl‐cycloSal‐phosphate triesters of ribo‐ and 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides were attached to aminomethyl polystyrene as an insoluble solid support and reacted with phosphate‐containing nucleophiles yielding nucleoside di‐ and triphosphates, nucleoside diphosphate sugars, and dinucleoside polyphosphates in high purity after cleavage from the solid support. Here, reactive cycloSal‐phosphate triesters were used as immobilized reagents that led to a generally applicable method for the efficient synthesis of phosphorylated biomolecules and phosphate‐bridged bioconjugates.     

Oligodeoxynucleotides Containing 2′‐Deoxy‐1‐methyladenosine and Dimroth Rearrangement

2′‐Deoxy‐1‐methyladenosine was incorporated into synthetic oligonucleotides by phosphoramidite chemistry. Chloroacetyl protecting group and controlled anhydrous deprotection conditions were used to avoid Dimroth rearrangement. Hybridization studies of intramolecular duplexes showed that introduction of a modified residue into the loop region of the oligonucleotide hairpin increases the melting temperature. It was shown that modified oligonucleotides may be easily transformed into oligonucleotides containing 2′‐deoxy‐N⁶‐methyladenosine.     

(2′‐O‐Methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA Chimeras: A New Class of Mixed Backbone Oligonucleotide Analogues with High Binding Affinity to RNA

The automated on‐line synthesis of DNA‐3′‐PNA chimeras 1 – 4 and (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimeras 5 – 8 is described, in which the 3′‐terminal part of the oligonucleotide is linked to the N‐terminal part of the PNA via N‐(ω‐hydroxyalkyl)‐N‐[(thymin‐1‐yl)acetyl]glycine units (alkyl=Et, Ph, Bu, and pentyl). By means of UV thermal denaturation, the binding affinities of all chimeras were directly compared by determining their T_m values in the duplex with complementary DNA and RNA. All investigated DNA‐3′‐PNA chimeras and (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimeras form more‐stable duplexes with complementary DNA and RNA than the corresponding unmodified DNA. Interestingly, a N‐(3‐hydroxypropyl)glycine linker resulted in the highest binding affinity for DNA‐3′‐PNA chimeras, whereas the (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimeras showed optimal binding with the homologous N‐(4‐hydroxybutyl)glycine linker. The duplexes of (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimeras and RNA were significantly more stable than those containing the corresponding DNA‐3′‐PNA chimeras. Surprisingly, we found that the charged (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimera with a N‐(4‐hydroxybutyl)glycine‐based unit at the junction to the PNA part shows the same binding affinity to RNA as uncharged PNA. Potential applications of (2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA)‐3′‐PNA chimeras include their use as antisense agents acting by a RNase‐independent mechanism of action, a prerequisite for antisense‐oligonucleotide‐mediated correction of aberrant splicing of pre‐mRNA.     

2′‐Ethynyl‐DNA: Synthesis and Pairing Properties

2‐Ethynyl‐DNA was developed as a potential DNA‐selective oligonucleotide analog. The synthesis of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified nucleosides was achieved starting from properly protected 2′‐ketonucleosides by addition of lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide followed by reduction of the tertiary alcohol. After a series of protecting‐group manipulations, phosphoramidite building blocks suitable for solid‐phase synthesis were obtained. The synthesis of oligonucleotides from these building blocks was successful when a fast deprotection scheme was used. The pairing properties of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified oligonucleotides can be summarized as follows: 1) The 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl modification of pyrimidine nucleosides leads to a strong destabilization in duplexes with DNA as well as with RNA. The likely reason is that the ethynyl group sterically influences the torsional preferences around the glycosidic bond leading to a conformation not suitable for duplex formation. 2) If the modification is introduced in purine nucleosides, no such influence is observed. The pairing properties are not or only slightly changed, and, in some cases (deoxyadenosine homo‐polymers), the desired stabilization of the pairing with a DNA complementary strand and destabilization with an RNA complement is observed. 3) In oligonucleotides of alternating deoxycytidine‐deoxyguanosine sequence, the incorporation of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl deoxyguanosine surprisingly leads to the formation of a left‐handed double helix, irrespective of salt concentration. The rationalization for this behavior is that the ethynyl group locks such duplexes in a left‐handed conformation through steric blockade.     

Oligonucleotides Containing Novel 4′‐C‐ or 3′‐C‐(Aminoalkyl)‐Branched Thymidines

The synthesis of four novel 3′‐C‐branched and 4′‐C‐branched nucleosides and their transformation into the corresponding 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite building blocks for automated oligonucleotide synthesis is reported. The 4′‐C‐branched key intermediate 11 was synthesized by a convergent strategy and converted to its 2′‐O‐methyl and 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro derivatives, leading to the preparation of novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐O‐methyl monomer X and 4′‐C‐(aminomethyl)‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro monomer Y (Schemes 2 and 3). In general, increased binding affinity towards complementary single‐stranded DNA and RNA was obtained with these analogues compared to the unmodified references (Table 1). The presence of monomer X or monomer Y in a 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide had a negative effect on the binding affinity of the 2′‐O‐methyl‐RNA oligonucleotide towards DNA and RNA. Starting from the 3′‐C‐allyl derivative 28 , 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐protected nucleosides and 3′‐O‐phosphoramidite derivatives were synthesized, leading to novel oligonucleotide analogues containing 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)thymidine monomer Z or the corresponding 3′‐C‐(3‐aminopropyl)‐2′‐O,5‐dimethyluridine monomer W (Schemes 4 and 5). Incorporation of the 2′‐deoxy monomer Z induced no significant changes in the binding affinity towards DNA but decreased binding affinity towards RNA, while the 2′‐O‐methyl monomer Z induced decreased binding affinity towards DNA as well as RNA complements (Table 2).     

The 2‐Cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl Group for the 2′‐Hydroxyl Protection of Ribonucleosides in the Solid‐Phase Synthesis of RNA Sequences

The reaction of 2‐cyano‐2‐methyl propanal with 2′‐O‐aminooxymethylribonucleosides leads to stable and yet reversible 2′‐O‐(2‐cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl)ribonucleosides. Following N‐protection of the nucleobases, 5′‐dimethoxytritylation and 3′‐phosphitylation, the resulting 2′‐protected ribonucleoside phosphoramidite monomers are employed in the solid‐phase synthesis of three chimeric RNA sequences, each differing in their ratios of purine/pyrimidine. When the activation of phosphoramidite monomers is performed in the presence of 5‐benzylthio‐1H‐tetrazole, coupling efficiencies averaging 99 % are obtained within 180 s. Upon completion of the RNA‐chain assemblies, removal of the nucleobase and phosphate protecting groups and release of the sequences from the solid support are carried out under standard basic conditions, whereas the cleavage of 2′‐O‐(2‐cyano‐2,2‐dimethylethanimine‐N‐oxymethyl) protective groups is effected (without releasing RNA alkylating side‐products) by treatment with tetra‐n‐butylammonium fluoride (0.5 m) in dry DMSO over a period of 24–48 h at 55 °C. Characterization of the fully deprotected RNA sequences by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), enzymatic hydrolysis, and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry confirmed the identity and quality of these sequences. Thus, the use of 2′‐O‐aminooxymethylribonucleosides in the design of new 2′‐hydroxyl protecting groups is a powerful approach to the development of a straightforward, efficient, and cost‐effective method for the chemical synthesis of high‐quality RNA sequences in the framework of RNA interference applications.     

Synthesis of Photolabile 5′‐O‐Phosphoramidites for the Photolithographic Production of Microarrays of Inversely Oriented Oligonucleotides

The photolabile 3′‐O‐{[2‐(2‐nitrophenyl)propoxy]carbonyl}‐protected 5′‐phosphoramidites ( 16 – 18 ) were synthesized (see Scheme) for an alternative mode of light‐directed production of oligonucleotide arrays. Because of the characteristics of these monomeric building blocks, photolithographic in situ DNA synthesis occurred in 5′→3′ direction, in agreement with the orientation of enzymatic synthesis. Synthesis yields were as good as those of conventional reactions. The resulting oligonucleotides are attached to the surface via their 5′‐termini, while the 3′‐hydroxy groups are available as substrates for enzymatic reactions such as primer extension upon hybridization of a DNA template (see Fig. 2). The production of such oligonucleotide chips adds new procedural avenues to the growing number of applications of DNA microarrays.     

Nucleotides,Part LXIX,Synthesis of Phosphoramidite Building Blocks of Isoxanthopterin N8‐(2′‐Deoxy‐β‐D‐ribonucleosides): New Fluorescence Markers for Oligonucleotide Synthesis

The chemical synthesis of isoxanthopterin and 6‐phenylisoxanthopterin N⁸‐(2′‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐ribofuranosyl nucleosides) is described as well as their conversion into suitably protected 3′‐phosphoramidite building blocks to be used as marker molecules for DNA synthesis. Applying the npe/npeoc (=2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl/[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl) strategy, we used the new building blocks in the preparation of oligonucleotides by an automated solid‐support approach. The hybridization properties of a series of labelled oligomers were studied by UV‐melting techniques. It was found that the newly synthesized markers only slightly interfered with the abilities of the labelled oligomers to form stable duplexes with complementary oligonucleotides.     

The 5‐Methylisocytosine β‐D‐Ribopyranosyl (4′ → 2′)‐Oligonucleotide

In the context of Eschenmoser's work on pyranosyl‐RNA (‘p‐RNA’), we investigated the synthesis and base‐pairing properties of the 5‐methylisocytidine derivative. The previously determined clear‐cut restrictions of base‐pairing modes of p‐RNA had led to the expectation that a 5‐methylisocytosine β‐D ‐ribopyranosyl (= D ‐pr(^MeisoC)) based (4′ → 2′)‐oligonucleotide would pair inter alia with D ‐pr(isoG) and L ‐pr(G) based oligonucleotides (D ‐pr and L ‐pr = pyranose form of D ‐ and L ‐ribose, resp.). Remarkably, we could not observe pairing with the D ‐pr(isoG) oligonucleotide but only with the L ‐pr(G) oligonucleotide. Our interpretation concludes that this – at first hand surprising – observation is caused by a change in the nucleosidic torsion angle specific for isoC.     

3′‐Deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐Oligonucleotide Duplexes (=p‐DNA Duplexes) as Substitutes of RNA Hairpin Structures

By automated synthesis, we prepared hybrid oligonucleotides consisting of covalently linked RNA and p‐DNA sequences (p‐DNA=3′‐deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐oligonucleotides) (see Table 1). The pairing properties of corresponding hybrid duplexes, formed from fully complementary single strands were investigated. An uninterrupted π‐π‐stacking at the p‐DNA/RNA interface and cooperative pairing between the two systems was achieved by connecting them via a 4′‐p‐DNA‐2′→5′‐RNA‐3′ and 5′‐RNA‐2′→4′‐p‐DNA‐2′ phosphodiester linkage, respectively (see Fig. 4). The RNA 2′‐phosphoramidites 9 – 12 , required for the formation of the RNA‐2′→4′‐p‐DNA phosphodiester linkage were synthesized from the corresponding, 3′‐O‐tom‐protected ribonucleosides (tom=[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl; Scheme 1). Analogues of the flavin mononucleotide (=FMN) binding aptamer 22 and the hammerhead ribozyme 25 were prepared. Each of these analogues consisted of two p‐DNA/RNA hybrid single strands with complementary p‐DNA sequences, designed to substitute stem/loop and stem motifs within the parent compounds. By comparative binding and cleavage studies, it was found that mixing of the two complementary p‐DNA/RNA hybrid sequences resulted in the formation of the fully functional analogues 23 ⋅ 24 and 27 ⋅ 28 of the FMN‐binding aptamer and of the hammerhead ribozyme, respectively.     

Synthesis and Pairing Properties of 3′‐Deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐Oligonucleotides (‘p‐DNA')

The preparation and the pairing properties of the new 3′‐deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide (=p‐DNA) pairing system, based on 3′‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐ribopyranose nucleosides is presented. D ‐Xylose was efficiently converted to the prefunctionalized 3‐deoxyribopyranose derivative 4‐O‐[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl]‐3‐deoxy‐D ‐ribopyranose 1,2‐diacetate 8 (obtained as a 4 : 1 mixture of α‐ and β‐D ‐anomers; Scheme 1). From this sugar building block, the corresponding, appropriately protected thymine, guanine, 5‐methylcytosine, and purine‐2,6‐diamine nucleoside phosphoramidites 29 – 32 were prepared in a minimal number of steps (Schemes 2–4). These building blocks were assembled on a DNA synthesizer, and the corresponding p‐DNA oligonucleotides were obtained in good yields after a one‐step deprotection under standard conditions, followed by HPLC purification (Scheme 5 and Table 1). Qualitatively, p‐DNA shows the same pairing behavior as p‐RNA, forming antiparallel, exclusively Watson‐Crick‐paired duplexes that are much stronger than corresponding DNA duplexes. Duplex stabilities within the three related (i.e., based on ribopyranose nucleosides) oligonucleotide systems p‐RNA, p‐DNA, and 3′‐O‐Me‐p‐RNA were compared with each other (Table 2). Intrinsically, p‐RNA forms the strongest duplexes, followed by p‐DNA, and 3′‐O‐Me‐p‐RNA. However, by introducing the nucleobases purine‐2,6‐diamine (D) and 5‐methylcytosine (M) instead of adenine and cytosine, a substantial increase in stability of corresponding p‐DNA duplexes was observed.     

Liquid‐Phase Synthesis of 2′‐Methyl‐RNA on a Homostar Support through Organic‐Solvent Nanofiltration

Due to the discovery of RNAi, oligonucleotides (oligos) have re‐emerged as a major pharmaceutical target that may soon be required in ton quantities. However, it is questionable whether solid‐phase oligo synthesis (SPOS) methods can provide a scalable synthesis. Liquid‐phase oligo synthesis (LPOS) is intrinsically scalable and amenable to standard industrial batch synthesis techniques. However, most reported LPOS strategies rely upon at least one precipitation per chain extension cycle to separate the growing oligonucleotide from reaction debris. Precipitation can be difficult to develop and control on an industrial scale and, because many precipitations would be required to prepare a therapeutic oligonucleotide, we contend that this approach is not viable for large‐scale industrial preparation. We are developing an LPOS synthetic strategy for 2′‐methyl RNA phosphorothioate that is more amenable to standard batch production techniques, using organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) as the critical scalable separation technology. We report the first LPOS‐OSN preparation of a 2′‐Me RNA phosphorothioate 9‐mer, using commercial phosphoramidite monomers, and monitoring all reactions by HPLC, ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and MS.     

Increased Affinity of 2′‐O‐(2‐Methoxyethyl)‐Modified Oligonucleotides to RNA through Conjugation of Spermine at Cytidines

Structural modification at the 2′‐O‐position of riboses in oligonucleotide therapeutics is of critical importance for their use as drugs. To date, the methoxyethyl (MOE) substituent is the most important and features in dozens of antisense oligonucleotides that have been tested in clinical trials. Yet, the search for new improved modifications continues in a quest for increased oligonucleotide potency, improved transport in vivo and favorable metabolism. Recently, we described how the conjugation of spermine groups to pyrimidines in oligonucleotides vastly increases their affinity for complementary RNAs through accelerated binding kinetics. Here we describe how spermines can be linked to the exocyclic amino groups of cytidines in MOE‐oligonucleotides employing a straightforward ‘convertible nucleoside approach’ during solid phase synthesis. Singly‐ or doubly‐modified oligonucleotides show greatly enhanced affinity for complementary RNA, with potential for a new generation of MOE‐based oligonucleotide drugs.     

Reliable Synthesis of Various Nucleoside Diphosphate Glycopyranoses

A reliable and high yielding synthetic pathway for the synthesis of the biologically highly important class of nucleoside diphosphate sugars (NDP‐sugars) was developed by using various cycloSal‐nucleotides 1 and 9 as active ester building blocks. The reaction with anomerically pure pyranosyl‐1‐phosphates 2 led to the target NDP‐sugars 20 – 45 in a nucleophilic displacement reaction, which cleaves the cycloSal moiety in anomerically pure forms. As nucleosides cytidine, uridine, thymidine, adenosine, 2′‐deoxy‐guanosine and 2′,3′‐dideoxy‐2′,3′‐didehydrothymidine were used while the phosphates of D ‐glucose, D ‐galactose, D ‐mannose, D ‐NAc‐glucosamine, D ‐NAc‐galactosamine, D ‐fucose, L ‐fucose as well as 6‐deoxy‐D ‐gulose were introduced.     

5‐Aza‐7‐deazaguanine DNA: Recognition and Strand Orientation of Oligonucleotides Incorporating Anomeric Imidazo[1,2‐a]‐1,3,5‐triazine Nucleosides

The base‐pairing properties of oligonucleotides containing the anomeric 5‐aza‐7‐deazaguanine 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides 1 and 5 are described. The oligonucleotides were prepared by solid‐phase synthesis, employing phosphoramidite or phosphonate chemistry. Stable `purine'⋅purine duplexes with antiparallel (aps) chain orientation are formed, when the α‐D ‐anomer 5 alternates with the β‐D ‐anomeric 2′‐deoxyguanosine ( 2 ) within the same oligonucleotide chain. Parallel (ps) oligonucleotide duplexes are observed, when the β‐D anomer 1 alternates with 2 . A renewed reversal of the chain orientation (ps→aps) occurs when compound 1 pairs with 2′‐deoxyisoguanosine ( 6 ). In all cases, it is unnecessary to change the orientation within a single strand when α‐D units alternate with their β‐D counterparts. Heterochiral base pairs of 5 (α‐D ) with 2′‐deoxyisoguanosine (β‐D ) are well accommodated in duplexes with random base composition and parallel chain orientation. Base pairs of 5 (α‐D ) with 2′‐deoxyguanosine (β‐D ) destabilize duplexes with antiparallel chains.     

Reliable Chemical Synthesis of Oligoribonucleotides (RNA) with 2′‐O‐[(Triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl(2′‐O‐tom)‐Protected Phosphoramidites

A method for the introduction of the 2′‐O‐[(triisopropylsilyl)oxy]methyl (=tom) group into N‐acetylated, 5′‐O‐dimethoxytritylated ribonucleosides is presented. The corresponding 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidite building blocks were obtained in pure form and were successfully employed for the routine synthesis of oligoribonucleotides on DNA synthesizers. Under DNA coupling conditions (2.5 min coupling time for a 1.5‐μmol synthesis scale) and with 5‐(benzylthio)‐1H‐tetrazole (BTT) as activator, 2′‐O‐tom‐protected phosphoramidites exhibited average coupling yields >99.4%. The combination of N‐acetyl and 2′‐O‐tom protecting groups allowed a reliable and complete two‐step deprotection, first with MeNH₂ in EtOH/H₂O and then with Bu₄NF in THF, without concomitant destruction of the product RNA sequences.     

A New and Efficient Method for Synthesis of 5′‐Conjugates of Oligonucleotides through Amide‐Bond Formation on Solid Phase

An efficient method for synthesis of oligonucleotide 5′‐conjugates through amide‐bond formation on solid phase is described. Protected oligonucleotides containing a 5′‐carboxylic acid function were obtained by use of a novel non‐nucleosidic phosphoramidite building block, where the carboxylic acid moiety was protected by a 2‐chlorotrityl group. The protecting group is stable to the phosphoramidite coupling conditions used in solid‐phase oligonucleotide assembly, but is easily deprotected by mild acidic treatment. The protecting group may be removed also by ammonolysis. 5′‐Carboxylate‐modified oligonucleotides were efficiently conjugated on solid support under normal peptide‐coupling conditions to various amines or to the N‐termini of small peptides to yield products of high purity. The method is well‐suited in principle for the synthesis of peptide‐oligonucleotide conjugates containing an amide linkage between the 5′‐end of an oligonucleotide and the N‐terminus of a peptide.     

Nucleotides,Part LXV,Synthesis of 2′‐Deoxyribonucleoside 5′‐Phosphoramidites: New Building Blocks for the Inverse (5′‐3′)‐Oligonucleotide Approach

The syntheses of the 3′‐O‐(4,4′‐dimethoxytrityl)‐protected 5′‐phosphoramidites 25 – 28 and 5′‐(hydrogen succinates) 29 – 32 , which can be used as monomeric building blocks for the inverse (5′‐3′)‐oligodeoxyribonucleotide synthesis are described (Scheme). These activated nucleosides and nucleotides were obtained by two slightly different four‐step syntheses starting with the base‐protected nucleosides 13 – 20 . For the protection of the aglycon residues, the well‐established 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethyl (npe) and [2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethoxy]carbonyl (npeoc) groups were used. The assembly of the oligonucleotides required a slightly increased coupling time of 3 min in application of the common protocol (see Table 1). The use of pyridinium hydrochloride as an activator (instead of 1H‐tetrazole) resulted in an extremely shorter activation time of 30 seconds. We established the efficiency of this inverse strategy by the synthesis of the oligonucleotide 3′‐conjugates 33 and 34 which carry lipophilic caps derived from cholesterol and vitamin E, respectively, as well as by the formation of (3′‐3′)‐ and (5′‐5′)‐internucleotide linkages (see Table 2).     

7‐Iodo‐5‐aza‐7‐deazaguanine ribonucleoside: crystal structure,physical properties,base‐pair stability and functionalization

The positional change of nitrogen‐7 of the RNA constituent guanosine to the bridgehead position‐5 leads to the base‐modified nucleoside 5‐aza‐7‐deazaguanosine. Contrary to guanosine, this molecule cannot form Hoogsteen base pairs and the Watson–Crick proton donor site N3—H becomes a proton‐acceptor site. This causes changes in nucleobase recognition in nucleic acids and has been used to construct stable `all‐purine' DNA and DNA with silver‐mediated base pairs. The present work reports the single‐crystal X‐ray structure of 7‐iodo‐5‐aza‐7‐deazaguanosine, C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>12</sub>IN<sub>5</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ( 1 ). The iodinated nucleoside shows an anti conformation at the glycosylic bond and an N conformation (O4′‐endo) for the ribose moiety, with an antiperiplanar orientation of the 5′‐hydroxy group. Crystal packing is controlled by interactions between nucleobase and sugar moieties. The 7‐iodo substituent forms a contact to oxygen‐2′ of the ribose moiety. Self‐pairing of the nucleobases does not take place. A Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1 highlights the contacts of the nucleobase and sugar moiety (O—H…O and N—H…O). The concept of pK‐value differences to evaluate base‐pair stability was applied to purine–purine base pairing and stable base pairs were predicted for the construction of `all‐purine' RNA. Furthermore, the 7‐iodo substituent of 1 was functionalized with benzofuran to detect motional constraints by fluorescence spectroscopy.     

A new route for the synthesis of phosphate esters: 2,2′‐[benzene‐1,2‐diylbis(oxy)]bis(5,5‐dimethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphinane) 2,2′‐dioxide

Podand‐type ligands are an interesting class of acyclic ligands which can form host–guest complexes with many transition metals and can undergo conformational changes. Organic phosphates are components of many biological molecules. A new route for the synthesis of phosphate esters with a retained six‐membered ring has been used to prepare 2,2′‐[benzene‐1,2‐diylbis(oxy)]bis(5,5‐dimethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphinane) 2,2′‐dioxide, C₆H₄{O[cyclo‐P(O)OCH₂CMe₂CH₂O]}₂ or C₁₆H₂₄O₈P₂, (1), 2‐[(2′‐hydroxybiphenyl‐2‐yl)oxy]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphinane 2‐oxide, [cyclo‐P(O)OCH₂CMe₂CH₂O](2,2′‐OC₆H₄–C₆H₄OH), (2), and oxybis(5,5‐dimethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphinane) 2,2′‐dioxide, O[cyclo‐P(O)OCH₂CMe₂CH₂O]₂, (3). Compound (1) is novel, whereas the results for compounds (2) and (3) have been reported previously, but we record here our results for compound (3), which we find are more precise and accurate than those currently reported in the literature. In (1), two cyclo‐P(O)OCH₂CMe₂CH₂O groups are linked through a catechol group. The conformations about the two catechol O atoms are quite different, viz. one C—C—O—P torsion angle is −169.11 (11)° and indicates a trans arrangement, whereas the other C—C—O—P torsion angle is 92.48 (16)°, showing a gauche conformation. Both six‐membered POCCCO rings have good chair‐shape conformations. In both the trans and gauche conformations, the catechol O atoms are in the axial sites and the short P=O bonds are equatorially bound.