Alkali‐Metal Pyrazolate Complexes with Unusual Pyrazolate Coordination Modes and Pseudocubane Motifs

The dimeric complex [Li(Ph₂pz)(OEt₂)]₂ ( 1 ) and tetrameric cluster [Na(Ph₂pz)(thf)]₄ ( 2 ) were prepared by treatment of alkali‐metal reagents (nBuLi and Na{N(SiMe₃)₂}, respectively) with 3,5‐diphenylpyrazole (Ph₂pzH) in Et₂O ( 1 ) or THF ( 2 ). The polymer [Na(tBu₂pz)]_n ( 3 ) was obtained from reaction at elevated temperature in a sealed tube between Na metal and 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylpyrazole (tBu₂pzH). The complex [Na₄(tBu₂pz)₂(thf)₃(obds)]₂ ( 4 ; obds=(OSiMe₂)₂O) was obtained as a minor product from prolonged treatment of tBu₂pzH with elemental sodium in a silicone‐greased flask. All four alkali‐metal pyrazolato complexes were characterized by IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography.The Li dimer 1 displays μ‐η²:η¹ lithium–pyrazolato binding, in which both lithium atoms are four‐coordinate. Room‐ and variable‐temperature NMR studies (¹H, ¹³C, and ⁷Li) of 1 suggest similar behavior in solution, with peaks coalescing at low temperatures. Complexes 2 and 4 display distorted cubane structures. In 2 , all the sodium atoms are five‐coordinate, whereas 4 contains two sodium/pyrazolate/thf clusters (4:2:3 ratio) bridged by two obds^2? units, as well as two four‐coordinate and two five‐coordinate sodium atoms. Compound 3 is composed of two independent chains with the unusual coordination modes μ₃‐η⁵:η²:η², μ₃‐η⁵:η²:η¹, and μ₃‐η⁴:η²:η¹, with five‐, six‐, and seven‐coordinate sodium atoms. Two oxo‐centered M₈ cage complexes [(tBu₂pz)₆Li₈O] ( 5 ) and [(tBu₂pz)₆Na₈O] ( 6 ) were obtained as by‐products from attempted preparation of [Li(tBu₂pz)] and [Na(tBu₂pz)], respectively, and their structures were determined.     

Europium is Different: Solvent and Ligand Effects on Oxidation State Outcomes and C-F Activation in Reactions Between Europium Metal and Pentafluorophenylsilver

Unique outcomes have emerged from the redox transmetallation/ protolysis (RTP) reactions of europium metal with [Ag(C₆F₅)(py)] (py=pyridine) and pyrazoles (RR′pzH). In pyridine, a solvent not normally used for RTP reactions, the products were mainly Eu^II complexes, [Eu(RR′pz)₂(py)₄] (RR′pz=3,5-diphenylpyrazolate (Ph₂pz) 1 ; 3-(2-thienyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazolate (ttfpz) 2 ; 3-methyl-5-phenylpyrazolate (PhMepz) 3 ). However, use of 3,5-di-tert-butylpyrazole (tBu₂pzH) gave trivalent [Eu(tBu₂pz)₃(py)₂] 4 , whereas the bulkier N,N′-bis(2,6-difluorophenyl)formamidine (DFFormH) gave divalent [Eu(DFForm)₂(py)₃] 5 . In tetrahydrofuran (thf), the usual solvent for RTP reactions, C−F activation was observed for the first time with [Ag(C₆F₅)(py)] in such reactions. Thus trivalent [{Eu₂(Ph₂pz)₄(py)₄(thf)₂(μ-F)₂}{Eu₂(Ph₂pz)₄(py)₂(thf)₄(μ-F)₂}] ( 6 ), [Eu₂(ttfpz)₄(py)₂(dme)₂(μ-F)₂] ( 7 ), [Eu₂(tBu₂pz)₄(dme)₂(μ-F)₂] ( 8 ) were obtained from the appropriate pyrazoles, the last two after crystallization from 1,2-dimethoxyethane (dme). Surprisingly 3,5-dimethylpyrazole (Me₂pzH) gave the divalent cage [Eu₆(Me₂pz)₁₀(thf)₆(μ-F)₂] ( 9 ). This has a compact ovoid core held together by bridging fluoride, thf, and pyrazolate ligands, the last including the rare μ₄-1η⁵(N₂C₃): 2η²(N,N′): 3κ(N): 4κ(N′) pyrazolate binding mode. With the bulky N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)formamidine (DippFormH), which often favours C−F activation in RTP reactions, neither oxidation to Eu^III nor C−F activation was observed and [Eu(DippForm)₂(thf)₂] ( 10 ) was isolated. By contrast, Eu reacted with Bi(C₆F₅)₃ and Ph₂pzH or tBu₂pzH in thf without C−F activation, to give [Eu(Ph₂pz)₂(thf)₄] ( 11 ) and [Eu(tBu₂pz)₃(thf)₂] ( 12 ) respectively, the oxidation state outcomes corresponding to that for use of [Ag(C₆F₅)(py)] in pyridine.     

When Metathesis Reactions Go Wrong: Novel Structural Consequences

The complex [Yb(Ph₂pz)₃(LiOBu)]₂ ( 1 ) (Ph₂pz = 3,5‐diphenylpyrazolate), fortuitously obtained from reaction of Yb metal with a lithium containing sample of [SnMe₃(Ph₂pz)] at elevated temperatures forms a centrosymmetric butoxy‐ and pyrazolate‐bridged open box structure. Each ytterbium atom is eight coordinate with one chelating Ph₂pz ligand, one μ‐η²:η² bridging pyrazolate, one μ‐η²(Yb):η⁴(Li) Ph₂pz group and two bridging butoxide ligands. Each lithium atom is unsymmetrically chelated by an η²‐Ph₂pz group, η⁴(N,C(pz)C₂(Ph)) bonded by another pyazolate group, and bridged through a butoxide oxygen atom to two ytterbium atoms. The type of η⁴‐pyrazolate coordination is unprecedented and is the first observation of interactions to a metal by the Ph rings of the Ph₂pz ligand. The complex [Li(dme)₃][Eu(Ph₂pz)₃(dme)] ( 2 ) obtained from reaction of Eu metal with the same sample of [SnMe₃(Ph₂pz)] in dme at room temperature is a charged separated species with the first anionic pyrazolatolanthanoidate(II) complex in which europium is eight coordinate with three chelating Ph₂pz ligands and a chelating dme.     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)n(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (n = 4; 5) und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)_n(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (n = 4; 5) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] The reaction of [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 2 ) with dppm yields the dinuclear species [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). Under thermal or photolytic conditions 3 loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and affords the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). 4 is also obtainable by an one‐pot synthesis from [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], an excess of ^tBu₂PH and stoichiometric amounts of dppm via the formation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)₂] ( 1 ). 4 exhibits a Ru–Ru double bond which could be confirmed by addition of methylene to the dimetallacyclopropane [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ). The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 5 were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Synthesis and Chloride Affinity of Sterically Demanding Ditopic Lithium Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates

The synthesis and full characterization of the sterically demanding ditopic lithium bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(Ph)pz^R₂)₂] is reported (pz^R = 3‐phenylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^Ph), 3‐t‐butylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^tBu)). Compound 3 ^Ph crystallizes from THF as THF‐adduct 3 ^Ph(THF)₄ which features a straight conformation with a long Li···Li distance of 12.68(1) Å. Compound 3 ^tBu was found to function as efficient and selective scavenger of chloride ions. In the presence of LiCl it forms anionic complexes [ 3 ^tBuCl]⁻ with a central Li‐Cl‐Li core (Li···Li = 3.75(1) Å).     

Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dieisenkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diiron Complexes: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts spontaneously with dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) to give [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 c ). By thermolysis or photolysis, 2 c loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and yields the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). 3 exhibits a Fe–Fe double bond which could be confirmed by the addition of methylene to the corresponding dimetallacyclopropane [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). The reaction of 1 with dppe (Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh₂) affords [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppe)] ( 5 ). In contrast to the thermolysis of 2 c , yielding 3 , the heating of 5 in toluene leads rapidly to complete decomposition. The reaction of 1 with PPh₃ yields [Fe₂(CO)₆(H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] ( 6 a ), while with ^tBu₂PH the compound [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 6 b ) is formed. The thermolysis of 6 b affords [Fe₂(CO)₅(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂] and the degradation products [Fe(CO)₃(^tBu₂PH)₂] and [Fe(CO)₄(^tBu₂PH)]. The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 6 b were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Ansa‐Complexes of [Mn(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]: Preparation,Characterization, and Reactivity of [n]Manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3)

We report the synthesis of [n]manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2) featuring boron, silicon, germanium, and tin as ansa‐bridging elements. Their preparation was achieved by salt‐elimination reactions of the dilithiated precursor [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁶‐C₆H₅Li)]?pmdta (pmdta=N,N,N′,N′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) with corresponding element dichlorides. Besides characterization by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, the identity of two single‐atom‐bridged derivatives, [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] and [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SiPh₂], could also be determined by X‐ray structural analysis. We investigated for the first time the reactivity of these ansa‐cyclopentadienyl–benzene manganese compounds. The reaction of the distannyl‐bridged complex [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)Sn₂tBu₄] with elemental sulfur was shown to proceed through the expected oxidative addition of the Sn?Sn bond to give a triatomic ansa‐bridge. The investigation of the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) capability of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] showed that an unexpected, unselective insertion into the C_ipso?Sn bonds of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] had occurred.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐X)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (X = Cl,S2CH)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐X)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (X = Cl, S₂CH) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts in benzene with elemental sulfur to the addition product [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). 2 is also obtained by reaction of 1 with ethylene sulfide. The reaction of 1 with carbon disulfide yields with insertion of the CS₂ into the Ru₂(μ‐H) bridge the dithioformato complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐S₂CH)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). Furthermore, 1 reacts with [NO][BF₄] to the complex salt [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)][BF₄] ( 4 ), and reaction of 1 with CCl₄ or CHCl₃ affords spontaneously [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐Cl)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) in nearly quantitative yield. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 and 5 were confirmed by crystal structure analyses.     

The Syntheses,Structures, and Magnetic Properties of Four 2D Lanthanide(III)‐naphthalenedicarboxylic Complexes

Four Ln‐NDC coordination polymers [Ln(NDC)(HNDC)(H₂O)] (Ln = La ( 1 ), Pr ( 2 ), Nd ( 3 ), Sm ( 4 ), H₂NDC = 1,4‐naphthalenedicarboxylic acid) were hydrothermally synthesized and structurally characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Compounds 1 – 4 are isomorphous, and their structures display a layer constructed from a Ln‐organic chain and NDC^2– ligand, in which the H₂NDC ligands adopt two different acidity‐dependent types and coordination modes: HNDC^1– with μ‐η¹:η¹ and NDC^2– with μ‐η¹:η²:η¹:η². The 3D supramolecular networks of 1 – 4 are mainly controlled by hydrogen bonds interactions. The magnetic susceptibilities of complexes 2 – 4 reveal overall antiferromagnetic interactions between the Ln^III ions. In addition, thermogravimetric analysis of compound 2 is described.     

Improved Synthesis of the [Ru(η6‐p‐cymene)Cl3] Anion: Facile Isolation under Mild Conditions

Reaction of [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂ with two equivalents of [Ph₄P][Cl] in CH₂Cl₂ yields [Ph₄P][Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₃], containing a trichlororuthenate(II) anion. In solution, an equilibrium between the product and [Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₂]₂ is observed, which in CDCl₃ is nearly completely shifted to the dimer, whereas in CD₂Cl₂ essentially a 1:1‐mixture of the two ruthenium species is present. Crystallization from CH₂Cl₂/pentane yielded two different crystals, which were identified by X‐ray analysis as [Ph₄P][Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₃] and [Ph₄P][Ru(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Cl₃]·CH₂Cl₂.     

Oxorhenium(V) Complexes with 1,3,4‐Triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene

Reactions of the oxorhenium(V) complexes [ReOX₃(PPh₃)₂] (X = Cl, Br) with the N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) 1,3,4‐triphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐ylidene (L^Ph) under mild conditions and in the presence of MeOH or water give [ReOX₂(Y)(PPh₃)(L^Ph)] complexes (X = Cl, Br; Y = OMe, OH). Attempted reactions of the carbene precursor 5‐methoxy‐1,3,4‐triphenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole ( 1 ) with [ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] or [NBu₄][ReOCl₄] in boiling xylene resulted in protonation of the intermediately formed carbene and decomposition products such as [HL^Ph][ReOCl₄(OPPh₃)], [HL^Ph][ReOCl₄(OH₂)] or [HL^Ph][ReO₄] were isolated. The neutral [ReOX₂(Y)(PPh₃)(HL^Ph)] complexes are purple, airstable solids. The bulky NHC ligands coordinate monodentate and in cis‐position to PPh₃. The relatively long Re–C bond lengths of approximate 2.1Å indicate metal‐carbon single bonds.     

Bis‐μ‐oxo and μ‐η2:η2‐peroxo dicopper complexes studied within (time‐dependent) density‐functional and many‐body perturbation theory

Based on the equilibrium geometries of [Cu₂(dbdmed)₂O₂]²⁺ and [Cu₂(en)₂O₂]²⁺ obtained within density‐functional theory, we investigate their molecular electronic structure and optical response. Thereby results from occupation‐constrained as well as time‐dependent DFT (ΔSCF and TDDFT) are compared with Green's function‐based approaches within many‐body perturbation theory such as the GW approximation (GWA) to the quasiparticle energies and the Bethe‐Salpeter equation (BSE) approach to the optical absorption. Concerning the ground‐state energies and geometries, no clear trend with respect to the amount of exact exchange in the DFT calculations is found, and a strong dependence on the basis sets is to be noted. They affect the energy difference between bis‐μ‐oxo and μ‐η²:η²‐peroxo complexes by as much as 0.8 eV (18 kcal/mol). Even stronger, up to 5 eV is the influence of the exchange‐correlation functional on the gap values obtained from the Kohn‐Sham eigenvalues. Not only the value itself but also the trends observed upon the bis‐μ‐oxo to μ‐η²:η²‐peroxo transition are affected. In contrast, excitation energies obtained from ΔSCF and TDDFT are comparatively robust with respect to the details of the calculations. Noteworthy, in particular, is the near quantitative agreement between TDDFT and GWA+BSE for the optical spectra of [Cu₂(en)₂O₂]²⁺. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Synthesis,Coordination Behavior,and Reduction Chemistry of Cymantrenyl‐1,3‐bis(2,3,4,5‐tetraphenyl)borole

We describe the synthesis of base‐free bisborole [Cym^?(BC₄Ph₄)₂]—Cym^?=(OC)₃Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₃)—and its transformation into two fully characterized Lewis acid–base adducts with pyridine bases of the type 4‐R? NC₅H₄ (R=tBu, NMe₂). The results of electrochemical, as well as NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies on [Cym^?(BC₄Ph₄)₂] and the related monoborole derivative [Cym(BC₄Ph₄)]—Cym=(OC)₃Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)—provided conclusive evidence for 1) the enhanced Lewis acidity of the two boron centers that result from conjugation of two borole fragments, and 2) the fact that Mn? B bonding interactions between the Lewis acidic borole moieties and the Mn center are considerably less pronounced for bisborole [Cym^?(BC₄Ph₄)₂]. In addition, the reduction chemistry of [Cym^?(BC₄Ph₄)₂] has been studied in detail, both electrochemically and chemically. Accordingly, chemical reduction of [Cym^?(BC₄Ph₄)₂] with magnesium anthracene afforded the corresponding tetraanion, which features a rare Mg? OC bonding mode in the solid state.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Rhenium(IV) and rhenium(V) complexes with 3,5-dimethylpyrazole

Mono-and dinuclear Re^IV and Re^V complexes with 3,5-dimethylpyrazole (Me₂pzH) were synthesized. The cis-[Re₂O₃Cl₄(3,5-Me₂pzH)₄] complex (cis-1) was prepared by the reaction of NH₄ReO₄ with K[HB(Me₂pz)₃] in concentrated HCl or by refluxing of [ReCl₃(MeCN)(PPh₃)₂] with Me₂pzH in air. The bromide complex trans-[Re₂O₃Br₄(3,5-Me₂pzH)₄] (trans-2) was synthesized by passing dry HBr through a solution of [Re₂O₃Br₂(μ-3,5-Me₂pz)₂(3,5-Me₂pzH)₂] (4) in chloroform. The pyrazolate-bridged complex [Re₂O₃Cl₂(μ-3,5-Me₂pz)₂(3,5-Me₂pzH)₂] (3) was prepared from (Et₄N)₂[ReOCl₅] or Cs₂[ReOCl₅] and Me₂pzH. The corresponding bromide and iodide complexes [Re₂O₃X₂(3,5-Me₂pz)₂(3,5-Me₂pzH)₂] · C₆H₆ (X = Br (4) or I (5)) were synthesized by the reactions of (NH₄)₂[ReBr₆] or K₂[ReI₆], respectively, with Me₂pzH. The [ReO(OMe)(3,5-Me₂pzH)₄]Br₂ · · 3,5-Me₂pzH · 4H₂O complex (6) was obtained as a by-product in the synthesis of complex 4. The reaction of [ReNCl₂(PPh₃)₂] with Me₂pzH was accompanied by hydrolytic denitration giving rise to the mixed-ligand complex [Re₂O₃Cl₂(μ-3,5-Me₂pz)₂(3,5-Me₂pzH)(PPh₃)] (7). The reaction of (NH₄)₂[ReBr₆] with a Me₂pzH melt gave the trans-[ReBr₄(3,5-Me₂pzH)₂] · · Me₂CO complex (8). The structures of complexes 2 and 4–8 were established by X-ray diffraction. All compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, electronic absorption spectroscopy, ¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and cyclic voltammetry. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 1, pp. 52–59, January, 2006.     

(Di‐tert‐butylmethylphosphane)(η2‐di‐tert‐butylphosphanylphosphinidene)(triphenylphosphane)platinum(0)

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Pt(C₈H₁₈P₂)(C₉H₂₁P)(C₁₈H₁₅P)] or [(Ph₃P)(^tBu₂PMe)Pt(η²‐^tBu₂PP)], contains four molecules in the asymmetric unit with slightly different conformations. The P—P distances in the ^tBu₂PP ligands are similar for all four molecules [2.0661 (13)–2.0678 (13) Å] and indicate a multiple character of the P—P bond in the ^tBu₂PP ligand. Molecules of the asymmetric unit can be assembled into a tetrahedron that fulfils the requirements for a rhombic disphenoid. The coordination of the Pt atom in all four molecules is square planar, with r.m.s. deviations from the PtP₄ planes in the range 0.03–0.05 Å. All planes of the PtP₄ groups are approximately parallel to the ab plane of the unit cell. The structure represents an unusual unsymmetrical platinum phosphinidene derivative.     

Bildung und Struktur von [μ‐(1,2 : 2‐η‐tBu2P–P){Mo(CO)2cp′}2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXIV. Formation and Structure of [μ‐(1,2 : 2‐η‐^tBu₂P–P){Mo(CO)₂cp′}₂] [cp′Mo(CO)₂]₂ (cp′ = C₅H₄^tBu) reacts with ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ to yield the compound [μ‐(1,2 : 2‐η‐^tBu₂P–P){Mo(CO)₂cp′}₂], which crystallizes in the space group P2₁2₁2₁ with a = 1202.42(7), b = 1552.48(8), and c = 1765.3(1) pm.     

Dinuclear Rare‐Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Supported by Indolyl Ligands in μ‐η2:η1:η1 Hapticities and their High Catalytic Activity for Isoprene 1,4‐cis‐Polymerization

Two series of new dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes supported by indolyl ligands in novel μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ hapticities are synthesized and characterized. Treatment of [RE(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of 3‐(tBuN?CH)C₈H₅NH ( L₁ ) in THF gives the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH(CH₂SiMe₃)}Ind)RE(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (Ind=indolyl, RE=Y, Dy, or Yb) in good yields. In the process, the indole unit of L₁ is deprotonated by the metal alkyl species and the imino C?N group is transferred to the amido group by alkyl CH₂SiMe₃ insertion, affording a new dianionic ligand that bridges two metal alkyl units in μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ bonding modes, forming the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes. When L₁ is reduced to 3‐(tBuNHCH₂)C₈H₅NH ( L₂ ), the reaction of [Yb(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of L₂ in THF, interestingly, generated the trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (major) and cis‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (minor) complexes. The catalytic activities of these dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes for isoprene polymerization were investigated; the yttrium and dysprosium complexes exhibited high catalytic activities and high regio‐ and stereoselectivities for isoprene 1,4‐cis‐polymerization.