The ratio of the irredundance number and the domination number for block-cactus graphs

Let γ(G) and ir(G) denote the domination number and the irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. Allan and Laskar [Proc. 9th Southeast Conf. on Combin., Graph Theory & Comp. (1978) 43–56] and Bollobás and Cockayne [J. Graph Theory (1979) 241–249] proved independently that γ(G) < 2ir(G) for any graph G. For a tree T, Damaschke [Discrete Math. (1991) 101–104] obtained the sharper estimation 2γ(T) < 3ir(T). Extending Damaschke's result, Volkmann [Discrete Math. (1998) 221–228] proved that 2γ(G) ≤ 3ir(G) for any block graph G and for any graph G with cyclomatic number μ(G) ≤ 2. Volkmann also conjectured that 5γ(G) < 8ir(G) for any cactus graph. In this article we show that if G is a block-cactus graph having π(G) induced cycles of length 2 (mod 4), then γ(G)(5π(G) + 4) ≤ ir(G)(8π(G) + 6). This result implies the inequality 5γ(G) < 8ir(G) for a block-cactus graph G, thus proving the above conjecture. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 29: 139–149, 1998     

Upper domination and upper irredundance perfect graphs

Let β(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number, respectively. A graph G is called Γ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. A graph G is called IR-perfect if Γ(H) =IR(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. In this paper, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of a family of forbidden induced subgraphs, and show that the class of Γ-perfect graphs is a subclass of IR-perfect graphs and that the class of absorbantly perfect graphs is a subclass of Γ-perfect graphs. These results imply a number of known theorems on Γ-perfect graphs and IR-perfect graphs. Moreover, we prove a sufficient condition for a graph to be Γ-perfect and IR-perfect which improves a known analogous result.     

Irredundance in inflated graphs

The inflation G_I of a graph G with n(G) vertices and m(G) edges is obtained by replacing every vertex of degree d of G by a clique K_d. We study the lower and upper irredundance parameters ir and IR of an inflation. We prove in particular that if γ denotes the domination number of a graph, γ(G_I) − ir(G_I) can be arbitrarily large, IR(G_I) ≤ m(G) and IR(G_I) ≤ n²(G)/4. These results disprove a conjecture of Dunbar and Haynes (Congr. Num. 118 (1996), 143–154) and answer another open question. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 28: 97–104, 1998     

Edge‐partitions of planar graphs and their game coloring numbers

Let G be a planar graph and let g(G) and Δ(G) be its girth and maximum degree, respectively. We show that G has an edge‐partition into a forest and a subgraph H so that (i) Δ(H) ≤ 4 if g(G) ≥ 5; (ii) Δ(H) ≤ 2 if g(G) ≥ 7; (iii) Δ(H)≤ 1 if g(G) ≥ 11; (iv) Δ(H) ≤ 7 if G does not contain 4‐cycles (though it may contain 3‐cycles). These results are applied to find the following upper bounds for the game coloring number col_g(G) of a planar graph G: (i) col_g(G) ≤ 8 if g(G) ≥ 5; (ii) col_g(G)≤ 6 if g(G) ≥ 7; (iii) col_g(G) ≤ 5 if g(G) ≥ 11; (iv) col_g(G) ≤ 11 if G does not contain 4‐cycles (though it may contain 3‐cycles). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 41: 307–317, 2002     

Vertex criticality for upper domination and irredundance

Let π be any of the domination parameters ir γ, i, β, Γ or IR. The graph G is π‐critical (π⁺‐critical) if the removal of any vertex of G causes π(G) to decrease (increase). We show that the classes of IR‐critical and Γ‐critical graphs coincide, and exhibit a class of Γ⁺‐critical graphs. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 37: 205–212, 2001     

The Domination Parameters of Cubic Graphs

Let ir(G), (G), i(G), ₀(G), (G) and IR(G) be the irredundance number, the domination number, the independent domination number, the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. In this paper we show that for any nonnegative integers k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄, k₅ there exists a cubic graph G satisfying the following conditions: (G) – ir(G) k₁, i(G) – (G) k₂, ₀(G) – i(G) > k₃, (G) – ₀(G) – k₄, and IR(G) – (G) – k₅. This result settles a problem posed in [9].Supported by the INTAS and the Belarus Government (Project INTAS-BELARUS 97-0093).Supported by RUTCOR.     

ContributionsUpper domination and upper irredundance perfect graphs

Let β(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number, respectively. A graph G is calledΓ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. A graph G is called IR-perfect if Γ(H) = IR(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. In this paper, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of a family of forbidden induced subgraphs, and show that the class of Γ-perfect graphs is a subclass of IR-perfect graphs and that the class of absorbantly perfect graphs is a subclass of Γ-perfect graphs. These results imply a number of known theorems on Γ-perfect graphs and IR-perfect graphs. Moreover, we prove a sufficient condition for a graph to be Γ-perfect and IR-perfect which improves a known analogous result.     

The geodetic number of the lexicographic product of graphs

A set S of vertices of a graph G is a geodetic set if every vertex of G lies in an interval between two vertices from S. The size of a minimum geodetic set in G is the geodetic number g(G) of G. We find that the geodetic number of the lexicographic product G°H for a non-complete graph H lies between 2 and 3g(G). We characterize the graphs G and H for which g(G°H)=2, as well as the lexicographic products T°H that enjoy g(T°H)=3g(G), when T is isomorphic to a tree. Using a new concept of the so-called geodominating triple of a graph G, a formula that expresses the exact geodetic number of G°H is established, where G is an arbitrary graph and H a non-complete graph.     

Hall parameters of complete and complete bipartite graphs

Given a graph G, for each υ ∈V(G) let L(υ) be a list assignment to G. The well‐known choice number c(G) is the least integer j such that if |L(υ)| ≥j for all υ ∈V(G), then G has a proper vertex colouring ? with ?(υ) ∈ L (υ) (?υ ∈V(G)). The Hall number h(G) is like the choice number, except that an extra non‐triviality condition, called Hall's condition, has to be satisfied by the list assignment. The edge‐analogue of the Hall number is called the Hall index, h′(G), and the total analogue is called the total Hall number, h″(G), of G. If the stock of colours from which L(υ) is selected is restricted to a set of size k, then the analogous numbers are called k‐restricted, or restricted, Hall parameters, and are denoted by h_k(G), h′_k(G) and h″_k(G). Our main object in this article is to determine, or closely bound, h′(K), h″(K_n), h′(K_m,n) and h′_k(K_m,n). We also answer some hitherto unresolved questions about Hall parameters. We show in particular that there are examples of graphs G with h′(G)?h′(G ? e)>1. We show that there are examples of graphs G and induced subgraphs H with h_k(G)<h_k(H) [this phenomenon cannot occur with unrestricted Hall numbers]. We also give an example of a graph G and an integer k such that h_k(G)<χ(G)<h(G). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 41: 208–237, 2002     

The ratio of the distance irredundance and domination numbers of a graph

Let n ≥ 1 be an integer and let G be a graph. A set D of vertices in G is defined to be an n-dominating set of G if every vertex of G is within distance n from some vertex of D. The minimum cardinality among all n-dominating sets of G is called the n-domination number of G and is denoted by γ_n(G). A set / of vertices in G is n-irredundant if for every vertex x ∈ / there exists a vertex y that is within distance n from x but at distance greater than n from every vertex of / - {x}. The n-irredundance number of G, denoted by ir_n(G), is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal n-irredundant sets of vertices of G. We show that inf{ir_n(G)/γ_n(G) | G is an arbitrary finite undirected graph with neither loops nor multiple edges} = 1/2 with the infimum not being attained. Subsequently, we show that 2/3 is a lower bound on all quotients ir_n(T)/γ_n(T) in which T is a tree. Furthermore, we show that, for n ≥ 2, this bound is sharp. These results extend those of R. B. Allan and R.C. Laskar [“On Domination and Some Related Concepts in Graph Theory,” Utilitas Mathematica, Vol. 21 (1978), pp. 43–56], B. Bollobás and E. J. Cockayne [“Graph-Theoretic Parameters Concerning Domination, Independence and Irredundance,” Journal of Graph Theory, Vol. 3 (1979), pp. 241–249], and P. Damaschke [Irredundance Number versus Domination Number, Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 89 (1991), pp. 101–104].     

Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 22. Extending bounds for independence to upper irredundance

A set of vertices S in a graph G is independent if no neighbor of a vertex of S belongs to S. A set of vertices U in a graph G is irredundant if each vertex v of U has a private neighbor, which may be v itself, i.e., a neighbor of v which is not a neighbor of any other vertex of U. The independence number α (resp. upper irredundance number IR) is the maximum number of vertices of an independent (resp. irredundant) set of G. In previous work, a series of best possible lower and upper bounds on α and some other usual invariants of G were obtained by the system AGX 2, and proved either automatically or by hand. These results are strengthened in the present paper by systematically replacing α by IR. The resulting conjectures were tested by AGX which could find no counter-example to an upper bound nor any case where a lower bound could not be shown to remain tight. Some proofs for the bounds on α carry over. In all other cases, new proofs are provided.     

Graham's pebbling conjecture on products of cycles

Chung defined a pebbling move on a graph G to be the removal of two pebbles from one vertex and the addition of one pebble to an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number of a connected graph is the smallest number f(G) such that any distribution of f(G) pebbles on G allows one pebble to be moved to any specified, but arbitrary vertex by a sequence of pebbling moves. Graham conjectured that for any connected graphs G and H, f(G×H)≤ f(G)f(H). We prove Graham's conjecture when G is a cycle for a variety of graphs H, including all cycles. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 42: 141–154, 2003     

Coloring of character graphs

In this paper, we study the character graph Δ(G) of a finite solvable group G. We prove that sum of the chromatic number of Δ(G) and the matching number of complement graph of Δ(G) is equal to the order of Δ(G). Also, we prove that when Δ(G) is not a block, the chromatic number of Δ(G) is equal to the clique number of Δ(G).     

A Structure Preserving Generalization of Independence,Domination and Irredundance

Abstract

The now famous inequality chain ir≤γ≤i≤β ≤ Γ ≤ IR, where ir and IR denote the lower and upper irredundance numbers of a graph, γ and Γ the lower and upper domination numbers, i the independent domination number and β the independence number of a graph, may be seen as the culmination of a process by which we start with independence (a hereditary property of vertex sets); we characterize maximal independence by domination (a superhereditary property of vertex sets), and then characterize minimal domination by irredundance (again a hereditary property). In this paper we generalize independent, dominating and irredundant sets of a graph G to what we will call s-dominating, s-independent and s-irredundant functions (for s a positive integer), which are functions of the type f : V (G) → N, in such a way that the maximal 1-independent, the minimal 1- dominating and the maximal 1-irredundant functions are the characteristic functions of the maximal independent, the minimal dominating and the maximal irredundant sets of G respectively. In addition, we would want to preserve those properties of and relationships between independence, domination and irredundance needed to extend the inequality chain ir≤γ≤i≤β ≤ Γ ≤ IR to one for s-dominating, s-independent and s-irredundant functions by a process similar to that described above.     

The upper traceable number of a graph

For a nontrivial connected graph G of order n and a linear ordering s: v ₁, v ₂, …, v _n of vertices of G, define . The traceable number t(G) of a graph G is t(G) = min{d(s)} and the upper traceable number t ⁺(G) of G is t ⁺(G) = max{d(s)}, where the minimum and maximum are taken over all linear orderings s of vertices of G. We study upper traceable numbers of several classes of graphs and the relationship between the traceable number and upper traceable number of a graph. All connected graphs G for which t ⁺(G) − t(G) = 1 are characterized and a formula for the upper traceable number of a tree is established. Research supported by Srinakharinwirot University, the Thailand Research Fund and the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand under the grant number MRG 5080075.     

The Forcing Convexity Number of a Graph

For two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, the set I(u,v) consists of all those vertices lying on a u-v geodesic in G. For a set S of vertices of G, the union of all sets I(u,v) for u, v S is denoted by I(S). A set S is a convex set if I(S) = S. The convexity number con(G) of G is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of G. A convex set S in G with |S| = con(G) is called a maximum convex set. A subset T of a maximum convex set S of a connected graph G is called a forcing subset for S if S is the unique maximum convex set containing T. The forcing convexity number f(S, con) of S is the minimum cardinality among the forcing subsets for S, and the forcing convexity number f(G, con) of G is the minimum forcing convexity number among all maximum convex sets of G. The forcing convexity numbers of several classes of graphs are presented, including complete bipartite graphs, trees, and cycles. For every graph G, f(G, con) con(G). It is shown that every pair a, b of integers with 0 a b and b is realizable as the forcing convexity number and convexity number, respectively, of some connected graph. The forcing convexity number of the Cartesian product of H × K ₂ for a nontrivial connected graph H is studied.     

On equality in an upper bound for domination parameters of graphs

We consider the well-known upper bounds μ(G) ≤|V(G)| − Δ(G), where Δ(G) denotes the maximum degree of G and μ(G) the irredundance, domination or independent domination numbers of G and give necessary and sufficient conditions for equality to hold in each case. We also describe specific classes of graphs for which equality does or does not hold and show that the difference between the domination and irredundance numbers can be arbitrary even when equality in the above bound holds for the domination number. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Edge‐face chromatic number and edge chromatic number of simple plane graphs

Given a simple plane graph G, an edge‐face k‐coloring of G is a function ? : E(G) ∪ F(G) → {1,…,k} such that, for any two adjacent or incident elements a, b ∈ E(G) ∪ F(G), ?(a) ≠ ?(b). Let χ_e(G), χ_ef(G), and Δ(G) denote the edge chromatic number, the edge‐face chromatic number, and the maximum degree of G, respectively. In this paper, we prove that χ_ef(G) = χ_e(G) = Δ(G) for any 2‐connected simple plane graph G with Δ (G) ≥ 24. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Semidefinite programming relaxations for graph coloring and maximal clique problems

The semidefinite programming formulation of the Lovász theta number does not only give one of the best polynomial simultaneous bounds on the chromatic number χ(G) or the clique number ω(G) of a graph, but also leads to heuristics for graph coloring and extracting large cliques. This semidefinite programming formulation can be tightened toward either χ(G) or ω(G) by adding several types of cutting planes. We explore several such strengthenings, and show that some of them can be computed with the same effort as the theta number. We also investigate computational simplifications for graphs with rich automorphism groups. Partial support by the EU project Algorithmic Discrete Optimization (ADONET), MRTN-CT-2003-504438, is gratefully acknowledged.     

A note on the bichromatic numbers of graphs

For a pair of integers k, l≥0, a graph G is (k, l)‐colorable if its vertices can be partitioned into at most k independent sets and at most l cliques. The bichromatic number χ^b(G) of G is the least integer r such that for all k, l with k+l=r, G is (k, l)‐colorable. The concept of bichromatic numbers simultaneously generalizes the chromatic number χ(G) and the clique covering number θ(G), and is important in studying the speed of hereditary properties and edit distances of graphs. It is easy to see that for every graph G the bichromatic number χ^b(G) is bounded above by χ(G)+θ(G)?1. In this article, we characterize all graphs G for which the upper bound is attained, i.e., χ^b(G)=χ(G)+θ(G)?1. It turns out that all these graphs are cographs and in fact they are the critical graphs with respect to the (k, l)‐colorability of cographs. More specifically, we show that a cograph H is not (k, l)‐colorable if and only if H contains an induced subgraph G with χ(G)=k+1, θ(G)=l+1 and χ^b(G)=k+l+1. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 263–269, 2010