Combining valproate and bipyridyl ligands to construct a 0D core‐shell Zn5(μ3‐OH)2 cluster and a 2D layered coordination network with a [Zn3(μ3‐OH)]2 SBU

Starting from the proposed zinc carboxylate cluster tetrakis(μ‐2‐propylpentanoato)dizinc(II), Zn₂(μ₂‐valp)₄ ( I ), of valproic acid, a branched short‐chain fatty acid, and bipyridine ligands, two new mixed‐ligand coordination compounds, namely, bis(2,2′‐bipyridine)di‐μ₃‐hydroxido‐hexakis(μ‐2‐propylpentanoato)bis(2‐propylpentanoato)pentazinc(II), [Zn₅(C₈H₁₅O₂)₈(OH)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂] ( II ), and poly[[bis(μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine)di‐μ₃‐hydroxido‐octakis(μ‐2‐propylpentanoato)bis(2‐propylpentanoato)hexazinc(II)] dimethylformamide disolvate], {[Zn₆(C₈H₁₅O₂)₁₀(OH)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]·2C₃H₇NO}_n ( III ), were synthesized. Compound II is a core‐shell‐type zero‐dimensional discrete Zn₅(μ₃‐OH)₂ metal–organic cluster with Zn ions in double‐triangle arrangements that share one Zn ion coincident with an inversion centre. The cluster contains three crystallographically non‐equivalent Zn ions exhibiting three different coordination geometries (tetrahedral, square pyramidal and octahedral). The cluster cores are well separated and embedded in a protective shell of the aliphatic branched short chains of valproate. As a result, there is no specific interaction between the discrete clusters. Conversely, compound III , a 2D layered coordination network with a secondary building unit (SBU), is formed by Zn₆(μ₃‐OH)₂ clusters exhibiting a chair‐like hexagonal arrangement. This SBU is formed from two Zn₃(μ₃‐OH) trimers related by inversion symmetry and connected by two syn–anti bridging carboxylate groups. Each SBU is connected by four 4,4′‐bipyridine ligands producing a 6³‐hcb net topology. 2D coordination layers are sandwiched within layers of dimethylformamide molecules that do not interact strongly with the network due to the hydrophobic protection provided by the valproate ligands.     

A novel two‐dimensional zinc(II) coordination polymer with 6‐mercaptonicotinic acid

The novel title Zn^II coordination polymer, poly[bis(μ‐6‐thioxo‐1,6‐dihydropyridine‐3‐carboxylato‐κ²S:O)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₆H₄NO₂S)₂]_n, consists of two crystallographically independent zinc centers and two 6‐mercaptonicotinate (Hmna⁻) ligands. Each Zn^II atom is four‐coordinated and lies at the center of a distorted tetrahedral ZnS₂O₂ coordination polyhedron, bridged by four Hmna⁻ ligands to form a two‐dimensional (4,4)‐network. Each Hmna⁻ ion acts as a bridging bidentate ligand, coordinating to two Zn^II atoms through the S atom and a carboxyl O atom. The metal centers reside on twofold rotation axes. The coordination mode of the S atoms and N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the protonated N atoms and the uncoordinated carboxyl O atoms give the extended structure a wavelike form.     

First‐row transition metal–pyridine (py)–sulfate [(py)xM](SO4) complexes (M = Ni,Cu and Zn): crystal field theory in action

The crystal structures of three first‐row transition metal–pyridine–sulfate complexes, namely catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)nickel(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(SO₄)(C₅H₅N)₄]_n, (1), di‐μ‐sulfato‐κ⁴O:O‐bis[tris(pyridine‐κN)copper(II)], [Cu₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆], (2), and catena‐poly[[tetrakis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′‐[bis(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)]‐μ‐sulfato‐κ²O:O′], [Zn₂(SO₄)₂(C₅H₅N)₆]_n, (3), are reported. Ni compound (1) displays a polymeric crystal structure, with infinite chains of Ni^II atoms adopting an octahedral N₄O₂ coordination environment that involves four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Cu compound (2) features a dimeric molecular structure, with the Cu^II atoms possessing square‐pyramidal N₃O₂ coordination environments that contain three pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. Zn compound (3) exhibits a polymeric crystal structure of infinite chains, with two alternating zinc coordination environments, i.e. octahedral N₄O₂ coordination involving four pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands, and tetrahedral N₂O₂ coordination containing two pyridine ligands and two bridging sulfate ligands. The observed coordination environments are consistent with those predicted by crystal field theory.     

A new layered zinc phosphate templated by protonated isonicotinate, [Zn2(C6H5NO2)2(HPO4)2]

An organic–inorganic hybrid compound, poly­[bis­[(pyridine‐4‐carboxyl­ato)­zinc(II)]‐di‐μ₃‐phosphato], [Zn₂(C₆H₅NO₂)₂(HPO₄)₂], has been hydro­thermally synthesized and structurally characterized. The crystal structure consists of two types of two‐dimensional layers of zinc hydrogenphosphate templated by protonated isonicotinate (ina) (or 4‐pyridine­carboxylic acid), which contain two crystallographically independent centrosymmetric [Zn₂(ina)₂(HPO4)₂] dimers as basic building units. The layers are interconnected via hydrogen‐bonding and heterocyclic ring interactions.     

A dinuclear zinc complex containing a diamond‐core geometry: [Zn2(μ2‐GueO)2(GueO)2(py)2]·0.5(toluene) (GueOH is guethol)

The title zinc alkoxide, bis(μ‐2‐ethoxyphenolato)‐κ³O¹,O²:O¹;κ³O¹:O¹,O²‐bis[(2‐ethoxyphenolato‐κ²O¹,O²)(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)] toluene hemisolvate, [Zn₂(C₈H₉O₂)₄(C₅H₅N)₂]·0.5C₇H₈, crystallizes with two independent complex molecules located on inversion centres and one independent toluene solvent molecule disordered about an inversion centre. The Zn^II atoms are six‐coordinated in distorted octahedral geometries with O₅N donor sets. The Zn^II ions and bridging alkoxide groups are arranged in a diamond Zn₂O₂ core structure. The guetholate (2‐ethoxyphenolate) ligands adopt two different coordination modes, viz. peripheral chelating and μ₂‐bridging. Preliminary investigations of the catalytic activity of the compound in the ring‐opening polymerization of L‐lactide demonstrate rapid and efficient generation of polylactide.     

Ein dreikerniger Zinkkomplex mit ZnS4‐, ZnS3O‐ und ZnS2NO‐Koordinationen

A Trinuclear Zinc Complex with ZnS₄, ZnS₃O, and ZnS₂NO Coordinations The reaction between the tris(thioimidazolyl)borate complex [Tt^tBuZn‐OClO₃] and 2‐pyridylbenzylalcohol (PBAH) yields the compound[(Tt^tBu)₃Zn₃(PBA)] (ClO₄)₂. In its trinuclear complex cation tris(thioimidazolyl)borate ligands, which adopt the umbrella conformation, bridge the zinc ions, which have the three different coordinations ZnS₄, ZnS₃O and ZnS₂NO.     

μ‐(4,4′‐Bi­pyri­dine)‐N:N′‐bis[bis‐(pyrrol­idine­dithio­car­boxyl­ato‐S,S′)zinc(II)]

The title compound, [Zn₂(C₅H₈NS₂)₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)], consists of two bis(pyrrol­idine­dithio­carboxylato)­zinc molecules bridged by a 4,4′‐bi­pyridine molecule, and has a 222 symmetry. Each Zn atom forms a five‐coordinate pseudo‐square‐based pyramidal arrangement, with four Zn—S interactions and one Zn—N interaction; the Zn—N distance is 2.085 (3) Å and the Zn—S distances are in the range 2.3319 (8)–2.6290 (9) Å.     

Molecular and Crystal Structures of Pentafluorophenyl‐platinum(II) Complexes with Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane,Bis(diphenylarsino)methane and 1,2‐Bis(diphenylarsino)ethane

The X‐ray crystal structures of [PtCl₂(dppm)], [Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] (L = dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), dpam (bis(diphenylarsino)methane), dpae (bis(diphenylarsino)ethane)) and [PtCl(C₆F₅)(dpae)] show the complexes to be monomeric with chelating dipnictido ligands, and not alternatives with bridging ligands. In [Pt(C₆F₅)₂(dpam)₂], there are two unidentate diarsine ligands in a cis‐arrangement.     

Monodentate and bridging behaviour of the sulfur‐containing ligand 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine in two discrete zinc(II) complexes with acetylacetonate

The Zn complexes bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)bis{4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κN¹}zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)₂], (I), and {μ‐4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κ²N¹:N^1′′}bis[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₅H₇O₂)₄(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)], (II), are discrete entities with different nuclearities. Compound (I) consists of two centrosymmetrically related monodentate 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine (L1) ligands binding to one Zn^II atom sitting on an inversion centre and two centrosymmetrically related chelating acetylacetonate (acac) groups which bind via carbonyl O‐atom donors, giving an N₂O₄ octahedral environment for Zn^II. Compound (II), however, consists of a bis‐monodentate L1 ligand bridging two Zn^II atoms from two different Zn(acac)₂ fragments. Intra‐ and intermolecular interactions are weak, mainly of the C—H...π and π–π types, mediating similar layered structures. In contrast to related structures in the literature, sulfur‐mediated nonbonding interactions in (II) do not seem to have any significant influence on the supramolecular structure.     

Binuclear and chain‐structure zinc(II) complexes constructed from 3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamic acid and N‐donor coligands 4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine

3,4‐Dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamic acid (Dmca) reacts with zinc sulfate in the presence of 4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine (L₁) or 4,4′‐bipyridine (L₂) under hydrothermal conditions to afford two mixed‐ligand coordination complexes, namely tetrakis(μ‐3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamato‐κ²O:O′)bis[[4‐(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine]zinc(II)] heptahydrate, [Zn₂(C₁₁H₁₁O₄)₄(C₈H₇N₃)₂]·7H₂O or [Zn₂(Dmca)₄(L₁)₂]·7H₂O, (I), and catena‐poly[[bis(3,4‐dimethoxy‐trans‐cinnamato‐κO)zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′], [Zn(C₁₁H₁₁O₄)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)]_n or [Zn(Dmca)₂(L₂)]_n, (II). The Zn^II centres in the two compounds display different coordination polyhedra. In complex (I), the Zn^II cation is five‐coordinated with a pseudo‐square‐pyramidal geometry, while in complex (II) the Zn^II cation sits on a twofold axis and adopts a distorted tetrahedral coordination environment. Complex (I) features a centrosymmetric binuclear paddle‐wheel‐like structure, while complex (II) shows a chain structure. This study emphasizes the significant effect of the coordination mode of both carboxylate‐group and N‐donor coligands on the formation of complex structures.     

Polymeric di­aqua­bis­[μ4‐1,3,5‐benzenetri­carboxyl­ato(3–)](μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine)­trizinc(II)

The solvothermal reaction of zinc(II) acetate with 1,3,5‐benzene­tri­carboxyl­ic acid and 4,4′‐bi­pyridine in 1‐butanol and acetic acid solution gives the title complex, [Zn₃(C₉H₃O₆)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n. There are two different coordination environments for the Zn atom, namely ZnNO₂(H₂O) and ZnO₄; in the latter case, the Zn atom lies on a twofold symmetry axis. Carboxyl­ate‐bridged Zn₃(O₂C)₆ clusters are connected through 1,3,5‐benzene­tri­carboxyl­ate and 4,4′‐bi­pyridine ligands (which lie about inversion centers), yielding a three‐dimensional framework.     

Phosphaniminato‐Acetato‐Cluster von Kupfer und Zink. Kristallstrukturen von [Cu4(NPEt3)2(O2CCH3)6] und [Zn4(NPEt3)2(O2CCH3)6]

Phosphoraneiminato Acetate Cluster of Copper and Zinc. Crystal Structures of [Cu₄(NPEt₃)₂(O₂CCH₃)₆] and [Zn₄(NPEt₃)₂(O₂CCH₃)₆] The anhydrous acetates of copper(II) and zinc react with the silylated phosphaneimine Me₃SiNPEt₃ in dichloromethane at 20 °C forming the mixed phosphoraneiminato acetate clusters [Cu₄(NPEt₃)₂(O₂CCH₃)₆] ( 1 ), which forms emerald crystals, and colourless [Zn₄(NPEt₃)₂ · (O₂CCH₃)₆] ( 2 ). In spite of analogous composition the structures of 1 and 2 are completely different. In the asymmetric unit of 1 three copper atoms of an almost isosceles triangle are linked via two nitrogen atoms of the NPEt₃^– groups to form a trigonal bipyramidal aggregate. One of these three copper atoms is chelated by an acetate group, another one is connected with the fourth copper atom via three μ₂‐O₂C–CH₃ groups. The asymmetric units are associated via a μ₂‐O₂C–CH₃ group and a μ₃‐OC(O)CH₃ group at a time so that infinite chains result. In 2 two zinc atoms are linked via the nitrogen atoms of the two NPEt₃^– groups to form an almost centrosymmetric four‐membered ring. Both nitrogen atoms of the four‐membered ring are connected with another zinc atom each. These zinc atoms again are linked with the zinc atoms of the Zn₂N₂ four‐membered ring via two μ₂‐O₂C–CH₃ groups each and additionally coordinated with a terminal acetate ligand each.     

Pentafluorothiophenolate derivatives of cobalt(II) and nickel(II). The molecular structure of [Ni(SC6F5)2Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2]

Summary The tetrahedral compounds [Co(SC₆F₅)₂L] (L=Ph₂P(CH₂) _n PPh₂,n=1, 2 and 3) and the squareplanar compound [Ni(SC₆F₅)₂(PhPCH₂CH₂PPh₂)] have been obtained by mathematical reactions of [MX₂L] (M=Co or Ni, X=Cl or Br) and Pb(SC₆F₅)₂. The reaction of pentacoordinate [CoCl(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂]⁺ and the lead salt yields [CoCl₂L] and [Co(SC₆F₅)₂L]. Magnetic moments, u.v. data (both in solution and solid state) and the crystal and molecular structure of the nickel compound are reported.     

Syntheses and structures of three macrocyclic supramolecular complexes and one ZnII‐containing coordination polymer generated from a semi‐rigid multidentate N‐containing ligand

Semirigid organic ligands can adopt different conformations to construct coordination polymers with more diverse structures when compared to those constructed from rigid ligands. A new asymmetric semirigid organic ligand, 4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine ( L ), has been prepared and used to synthesize three bimetallic macrocyclic complexes and one coordination polymer, namely, bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[dichloridozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( I ), the analogous chloroform monosolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·CHCl₃, ( II ), bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[diiodidozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂I₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( III ), and catena‐poly[[[diiodidozinc(II)]‐μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine] chloroform monosolvate], {[ZnI₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)]·CHCl₃}_n, ( IV ), by solution reaction with ZnX₂ (X = Cl and I) in a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH or CHCl₃/CH₃OH mixed solvent system at room temperature. Complex ( I ) is isomorphic with complex ( III ) and has a bimetallic ring possessing similar coordination environments for both of the Zn^II cations. Although complex ( II ) also contains a bimetallic ring, the two Zn^II cations have different coordination environments. Under the influence of the I^? anion and guest CHCl₃ molecule, complex ( IV ) displays a significantly different structure with respect to complexes ( I )–( III ). C—H…Cl and C—H…N hydrogen bonds, and π–π stacking or C—Cl…π interactions exist in complexes ( I )–( IV ), and these weak interactions play an important role in the three‐dimensional structures of ( I )–( IV ) in the solid state. In addition, the fluorescence properties of L and complexes ( I )–( IV ) were investigated.     

A sulfur coordination polymer with wide bandgap semiconductivity formed from zinc(II) and 5‐methylsulfanyl‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2‐thione

The sulfur coordination polymer catena‐poly[zinc(II)‐μ₂‐bis[5‐(methylsulfanyl)‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐3‐ido‐κ²N³:S]], [Zn(C₃H₃N₂S₃)₂]_n or [Zn₂MTT₄]_n, constructed from Zn²⁺ ions and 5‐methylsulfanyl‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2‐thione (HMTT), was synthesized successfully and structurally characterized. [Zn₂MTT₄]_n crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I (No. 82). Each MTT^? ligand (systematic name: 5‐methylsulfanyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐3‐ide) coordinates to two different Zn^II ions, one via the thione group and the other via a ring N atom, with one Zn^II atom being in a tetrahedral ZnS₄ and the other in a tetrahedral ZnN₄ coordination environment. These tetrahedral ZnS₄ and ZnN₄ units are alternately linked by the organic ligands, forming a one‐dimensional chain structure along the c axis. The one‐dimensional chains are further linked via C—H…N and C—H…S hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional network adopting an ABAB‐style arrangement that lies along both the a and b axes. The three‐dimensional Hirshfeld surface analysis and two‐dimensional (2D) fingerprint plots confirm the major interactions as C—H…S hydrogen bonds with a total of 35.1%, while 7.4% are C—H…N hydrogen‐bond interactions. [Zn₂MTT₄]_n possesses high thermal and chemical stability and a linear temperature dependence of the bandgap from room temperature to 270 °C. Further investigation revealed that the bandgap changes sharply in ammonia, but only fluctuates slightly in other solvents, indicating its promising application as a selective sensor.     

A Manganese(II) Coordination Polymer with Ditopic Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate Bridges

The synthesis and characterization of the ditopic bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate ligand Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] is reported (pz = pyrazol‐1‐yl). Compared to the corresponding t‐butyl derivative Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(t‐Bu)pz₂)₂], the C₆F₅‐substituted scorpionate is significantly more stable towards hydrolysis. Reaction of Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] with two equivalents of MnCl₂ leads to the formation of coordination polymers {(MnCl₂)₂(Li(THF)₃)₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂]}_∞ featuring penta‐coordinate Mn^II ions chelated by one bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate fragment and further bonded to three chloride ions. Two of the three chloride ions are also coordinated to a neighbouring Mn^II ion; the third chloro ligand is shared between the Mn^II centre and a Li(THF)₃ moiety.     

Two tetranuclear zinc clusters, [Zn4(μ3‐OEt)2(μ2‐MalO)4Et2] and [Zn4(μ3‐GueO)2(μ2‐GueO)2(μ2‐MalO)2(MalO)2]·2C7H8, containing defective dicubane core geometries (MalOH is maltol and GueOH is guethol)

The zinc alkoxide molecules in di‐μ₃‐ethanolato‐diethyltetrakis(μ₂‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ³O³,O⁴:O³)tetrazinc(II), [Zn₄(C₂H₅)₂(C₂H₅O)₂(C₆H₅O₃)₄], (I), and bis(μ₃‐2‐ethoxyphenolato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O¹:O¹)bis(μ₂‐2‐ethoxyphenolato‐κ³O¹,O²:O¹)bis(μ₂‐2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ³O³,O⁴:O³)bis(2‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐3‐olato‐κ²O³,O⁴)tetrazinc(II) toluene disolvate, [Zn₄(C₆H₅O₃)₄(C₈H₉O₂)₄]·2C₇H₈, (II), lie on crystallographic centres of inversion. The asymmetric units of (I) and (II) contain half of the tetrameric unit and additionally one molecule of toluene for (II). The Zn^II atoms are four‐ and six‐coordinated in distorted tetrahedral and octahedral geometries for (I), and six‐coordinated in a distorted octahedral environment for (II). The Zn^II atoms in both compounds are arranged in a defect dicubane Zn₄O₆ core structure composed of two EtZnO₃ tetrahedra and ZnO₆ octahedra for (I), and of four ZnO₆ octahedra for (II), sharing common corners. The maltolate ligands exist mostly in a μ₂‐bridging mode, while the guetholate ligands prefer a higher coordination mode and act as μ₃‐ and μ₂‐bridges.     

Thiosemicarbazonates of Ruthenium(II): Crystal Structures of [Bis(triphenylphosphine)][bis(N‐phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphino)butane][bis(salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II)

Reaction of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ with N‐Phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (C₅H₄N–C²(H)=N³‐N²H–C¹(=S)N¹HC₆H₅, Hpytsc‐NPh) in presence of Et₃N base led to loss of ‐N²H‐proton and yielded the complex [Ru(pytsc‐NPh)₂(Ph₃P)₂] ( 1 ). Similar reactions of precursor RuCl₂[(p‐tolyl)₃P]₃ with a series of thiosemicarbazone ligands, viz. pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hpytsc), salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (H₂stsc), and benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hbtsc), have yielded the complexes, [Ru(pytsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 2 ), [Ru(Hstsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}]₂ ( 3 ), and [Ru(btsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 4 ), respectively. The reactions of precursor Ru₂Cl₄(dppb)₃ {dppb = Ph₂P–(CH₂)₄–PPh₂} with H₂stsc, Hbtsc, furan‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hftsc) and thiophene‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Httsc) have formed complexes of the composition, [Ru(Hstsc)₂(dppb)] ( 5 ), [Ru(btsc)₂(dppb)] ( 6 ), [Ru(ftsc)₂(dppb)] ( 7 ), and [Ru(ttsc)₂(dppb)] ( 8 ). The complexes have been characterized by analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography ( 1 and 5 ). The proton NMR confirmed loss of –N²H– proton in all the compounds, and ³¹P NMR spectra reveal the presence of equivalent phosphorus atoms in the complexes. In all the compounds, thiosemicarbazone ligands coordinate to the Ru^II atom via hydrazinic nitrogen (N²) and sulfur atoms. The arrangement around each metal atom is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of donor atoms.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Thermal Properties of New Zinc(II) Thiocyanato Coordination Compounds

Reaction of zinc(II) thiocyanate with pyrazine, pyrimidine, pyridazine, and pyridine leads to the formation of new zinc(II) thiocyanato coordination compounds. In bis(isothiocyanato‐N)‐bis(μ₂‐pyrazine‐N,N) zinc(II) ( 1 ) and bis(isothiocyanato‐N)‐bis(μ₂‐pyrimidine‐N,N) zinc(II) ( 2 ) the zinc atoms are coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of the diazine ligands and two nitrogen atoms of the isothiocyanato anions within slightly distorted octahedra. The zinc atoms are connected by the diazine ligands into layers, which are further linked by weak intermolecular S ··· S interactions in 1 and by weak intermolecular C–H ··· S hydrogen bonding in 2 . In bis(isothiocyanato‐N)‐bis(pyridazine‐N) ( 3 ) discrete complexes are found, in which the zinc atoms are coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of the isothiocyanato ligands and two nitrogen atoms of the pyridazine ligands. The crystal structure of bis(isothiocyanato‐N)‐tetrakis(pyridine‐N) ( 4 ) is known and consists of discrete complexes, in which the zinc atoms are octahedrally coordinated by two thiocyanato anions and four pyridine molecules. Investigations using simultaneous differential thermoanalysis and thermogravimetry, X‐ray powder diffraction and IR spectroscopy prove that on heating, the ligand‐rich compounds 1 , 2 , and 3 decompose without the formation of ligand‐deficient intermediate phases. In contrast, compound 4 looses the pyridine ligands in two different steps, leading to the formation of the literature known ligand‐deficient compound bis(isothiocyanato‐N)‐bis(pyridine‐N) ( 5 ) as an intermediate. The crystal structure of compound 5 consists of tetrahedrally coordinated zinc atoms which are surrounded by two isothiocyanato anions and two pyridine ligands. The structures and the thermal reactivity are discussed and compared with this of related transition metal isothiocyanates with pyrazine, pyrimidine, pyridazine, and pyridine.     

Motive dichtester Kugelpackungen: Die Verbindungen Zn3(PS4)2 und LiZnPS4

Motifs of Closest Packings: The Compounds Zn₃(PS₄)₂ and LiZnPS₄ The crystal structure of Zn₃(PS₄)₂ was determined by single crystal X‐ray methods. The compound crystallizes tetragonally (P4¯n2; a = 7.823(1), c = 9.053(1)Å; Z = 2) with a new structure type built up by corner‐sharing ZnS₄ tetrahedra, which form two‐dimensional layers. Between them the P atoms are coordinated likewise tetrahedrally by sulfur. The PS₄ tetrahedra are arranged according to the motif of the cubic closest packing with zinc in three quarters of the tetrahedral voids. LiZnPS₄ (I4¯; a = 5.738(1), c = 8.914(1)Å; Z = 2) was synthesized by heating the elements at 400 °C. In comparison with Zn₃(PS₄)₂ one Zn atom is replaced by two Li atoms. The metal atoms are located in the centres of the sulfur tetrahedra in such a way that the unit cell volume is only about half that of the zinc compound. In this packing of the PS₄ units all the tetrahedral voids are occupied by lithium and zinc atoms. Chemical bonding in LiZnPS₄ is discussed by means of the electron localization function ELF.