Binding pose and affinity prediction in the 2016 D3R Grand Challenge 2 using the Wilma-SIE method

The Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) exhibits significant backbone movement in response to the binding of various ligands and can be a challenge for pose prediction algorithms. As part of the D3R Grand Challenge 2, we tested Wilma-SIE, a rigid-protein docking method, on a set of 36 FXR ligands for which the crystal structures had originally been blinded. These ligands covered several classes of compounds. To overcome the rigid protein limitations of the method, we used an ensemble of publicly available structures for FXR from the PDB. The use of the ensemble allowed Wilma-SIE to predict poses with average and median RMSDs of 2.3 and 1.4 Å, respectively. It was quite clear, however, that had we used a single structure for the receptor the success rate would have been much lower. The most successful predictions were obtained on chemical classes for which one or more crystal structures of the receptor bound to a molecule of the same class was available. In the absence of a crystal structure for the class, observing a consensus binding mode for the ligands of the class using one or more receptor structures of other classes seemed to be indicative of a reasonable pose prediction. Affinity prediction proved to be more challenging with generally poor correlation with experimental IC50s (Kendall tau?~?0.3). Even when the 36 crystal structures were used the accuracy of the predicted affinities was not appreciably improved. A possible cause of difficulty is the internal energy strain arising from conformational differences in the receptor across complexes, which may need to be properly estimated and incorporated into the SIE scoring function.     

Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes

Inspired by the current representation of the ligand-receptor binding process, a normal-mode-based methodology is presented to incorporate receptor flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening. However, the systematic representation of the deformation space grows geometrically with the number of modes, and furthermore, midscale loop rearrangements like those found in protein kinase binding pockets cannot be accounted for with the first lowest-frequency modes. We thus introduced a measure of relevance of normal modes on a given region of interest and showed that only very few modes in the low-frequency range are necessary and sufficient to describe loop flexibility in cAMP-dependent protein kinase. We used this approach to generate an ensemble of representative receptor backbone conformations by perturbing the structure along a combination of relevant modes. Each ensemble conformation is complexed with known non-native binders to optimize the position of the binding-pocket side chains through a full flexible docking procedure. The multiple receptor conformations thus obtained are used in a small-scale virtual screening using receptor ensemble docking. We evaluated this algorithm on holo and apo structures of cAMP-dependent protein kinase that exhibit backbone rearrangements on two independent loop regions close to the binding pocket. Docking accuracy is improved, since the ligands considered in the virtual screening docked within 1.5 A to at least one of the structures. The discrimination between binders and nonbinders is also enhanced, as shown by the improvement of the enrichment factor. This constitutes a new step toward the systematic integration of flexible ligand-flexible receptor docking tools in structure-based drug discovery.     

Potential and limitations of ensemble docking

A major problem in structure-based virtual screening applications is the appropriate selection of a single or even multiple protein structures to be used in the virtual screening process. A priori it is unknown which protein structure(s) will perform best in a virtual screening experiment. We investigated the performance of ensemble docking, as a function of ensemble size, for eight targets of pharmaceutical interest. Starting from single protein structure docking results, for each ensemble size up to 500,000 combinations of protein structures were generated, and, for each ensemble, pose prediction and virtual screening results were derived. Comparison of single to multiple protein structure results suggests improvements when looking at the performance of the worst and the average over all single protein structures to the performance of the worst and average over all protein ensembles of size two or greater, respectively. We identified several key factors affecting ensemble docking performance, including the sampling accuracy of the docking algorithm, the choice of the scoring function, and the similarity of database ligands to the cocrystallized ligands of ligand-bound protein structures in an ensemble. Due to these factors, the prospective selection of optimum ensembles is a challenging task, shown by a reassessment of published ensemble selection protocols.     

Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015

The growing number of protein–ligand complex structures, particularly the structures of proteins co-bound with different ligands, in the Protein Data Bank helps us tackle two major challenges in molecular docking studies: the protein flexibility and the scoring function. Here, we introduced a systematic strategy by using the information embedded in the known protein–ligand complex structures to improve both binding mode and binding affinity predictions. Specifically, a ligand similarity calculation method was employed to search a receptor structure with a bound ligand sharing high similarity with the query ligand for the docking use. The strategy was applied to the two datasets (HSP90 and MAP4K4) in recent D3R Grand Challenge 2015. In addition, for the HSP90 dataset, a system-specific scoring function (ITScore2_hsp90) was generated by recalibrating our statistical potential-based scoring function (ITScore2) using the known protein–ligand complex structures and the statistical mechanics-based iterative method. For the HSP90 dataset, better performances were achieved for both binding mode and binding affinity predictions comparing with the original ITScore2 and with ensemble docking. For the MAP4K4 dataset, although there were only eight known protein–ligand complex structures, our docking strategy achieved a comparable performance with ensemble docking. Our method for receptor conformational selection and iterative method for the development of system-specific statistical potential-based scoring functions can be easily applied to other protein targets that have a number of protein–ligand complex structures available to improve predictions on binding.     

Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening

Poor performance of scoring functions is a well-known bottleneck in structure-based virtual screening (VS), which is most frequently manifested in the scoring functions' inability to discriminate between true ligands vs known nonbinders (therefore designated as binding decoys). This deficiency leads to a large number of false positive hits resulting from VS. We have hypothesized that filtering out or penalizing docking poses recognized as non-native (i.e., pose decoys) should improve the performance of VS in terms of improved identification of true binders. Using several concepts from the field of cheminformatics, we have developed a novel approach to identifying pose decoys from an ensemble of poses generated by computational docking procedures. We demonstrate that the use of target-specific pose (scoring) filter in combination with a physical force field-based scoring function (MedusaScore) leads to significant improvement of hit rates in VS studies for 12 of the 13 benchmark sets from the clustered version of the Database of Useful Decoys (DUD). This new hybrid scoring function outperforms several conventional structure-based scoring functions, including XSCORE::HMSCORE, ChemScore, PLP, and Chemgauss3, in 6 out of 13 data sets at early stage of VS (up 1% decoys of the screening database). We compare our hybrid method with several novel VS methods that were recently reported to have good performances on the same DUD data sets. We find that the retrieved ligands using our method are chemically more diverse in comparison with two ligand-based methods (FieldScreen and FLAP::LBX). We also compare our method with FLAP::RBLB, a high-performance VS method that also utilizes both the receptor and the cognate ligand structures. Interestingly, we find that the top ligands retrieved using our method are highly complementary to those retrieved using FLAP::RBLB, hinting effective directions for best VS applications. We suggest that this integrative VS approach combining cheminformatics and molecular mechanics methodologies may be applied to a broad variety of protein targets to improve the outcome of structure-based drug discovery studies.     

Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring

Docking and scoring are critical issues in virtual drug screening methods. Fast and reliable methods are required for the prediction of binding affinity especially when applied to a large library of compounds. The implementation of receptor flexibility and refinement of scoring functions for this purpose are extremely challenging in terms of computational speed. Here we propose a knowledge-based multiple-conformation docking method that efficiently accommodates receptor flexibility thus permitting reliable virtual screening of large compound libraries. Starting with a small number of active compounds, a preliminary docking operation is conducted on a large ensemble of receptor conformations to select the minimal subset of receptor conformations that provides a strong correlation between the experimental binding affinity (e.g., Ki, IC50) and the docking score. Only this subset is used for subsequent multiple-conformation docking of the entire data set of library (test) compounds. In conjunction with the multiple-conformation docking procedure, a two-step scoring scheme is employed by which the optimal scoring geometries obtained from the multiple-conformation docking are re-scored by a molecular mechanics energy function including desolvation terms. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, we applied this integrated approach to the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) system for which published binding affinity data were available for a series of structurally diverse chemicals. The statistical correlation between docking scores and experimental values was significantly improved from those of single-conformation dockings. This approach led to substantial enrichment of the virtual screening conducted on mixtures of active and inactive ERalpha compounds.     

The ensemble performance index: an improved measure for assessing ensemble pose prediction performance

We present a theoretical study on the performance of ensemble docking methodologies considering multiple protein structures. We perform a theoretical analysis of pose prediction experiments which is completely unbiased, as we make no assumptions about specific scoring functions, search paradigms, protein structures, or ligand data sets. We introduce a novel interpretable measure, the ensemble performance index (EPI), for the assessment of scoring performance in ensemble docking, which will be applied to simulated and real data sets.     

Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors

Since the evaluation of ligand conformations is a crucial aspect of structure-based virtual screening, scoring functions play significant roles in it. However, it is known that a scoring function does not always work well for all target proteins. When one cannot know which scoring function works best against a target protein a priori, there is no standard scoring method to know it even if 3D structure of a target protein-ligand complex is available. Therefore, development of the method to achieve high enrichments from given scoring functions and 3D structure of protein-ligand complex is a crucial and challenging task. To address this problem, we applied SCS (supervised consensus scoring), which employs a rough linear correlation between the binding free energy and the root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of a native ligand conformations and incorporates protein-ligand binding process with docked ligand conformations using supervised learning, to virtual screening. We evaluated both the docking poses and enrichments of SCS and five scoring functions (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, ChemScore, and PMF) for three different target proteins: thymidine kinase (TK), thrombin (thrombin), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Our enrichment studies show that SCS is competitive or superior to a best single scoring function at the top ranks of screened database. We found that the enrichments of SCS could be limited by a best scoring function, because SCS is obtained on the basis of the five individual scoring functions. Therefore, it is concluded that SCS works very successfully from our results. Moreover, from docking pose analysis, we revealed the connection between enrichment and average centroid distance of top-scored docking poses. Since SCS requires only one 3D structure of protein-ligand complex, SCS will be useful for identifying new ligands.     

Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling

The efficient and accurate quantification of protein-ligand interactions using computational methods is still a challenging task. Two factors strongly contribute to the failure of docking methods to predict free energies of binding accurately: the insufficient incorporation of protein flexibility coupled to ligand binding and the neglected dynamics of the protein-ligand complex in current scoring schemes. We have developed a new methodology, named the 'ligand-model' concept, to sample protein conformations that are relevant for binding structurally diverse sets of ligands. In the ligand-model concept, molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations are performed with a virtual ligand, represented by a collection of functional groups that binds to the protein and dynamically changes its shape and properties during the simulation. The ligand model essentially represents a large ensemble of different chemical species binding to the same target protein. Representative protein structures were obtained from the MD simulation, and docking was performed into this ensemble of protein conformation. Similar binding poses were clustered, and the averaged score was utilized to rerank the poses. We demonstrate that the ligand-model approach yields significant improvements in predicting native-like binding poses and quantifying binding affinities compared to static docking and ensemble docking simulations into protein structures generated from an apo MD simulation.     

A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity

Molecular docking predicts the best pose of a ligand in the target protein binding site by sampling and scoring numerous conformations and orientations of the ligand. Failures in pose prediction are often due to either insufficient sampling or scoring function errors. To improve the accuracy of pose prediction by tackling the sampling problem, we have developed a method of pose prediction using shape similarity. It first places a ligand conformation of the highest 3D shape similarity with known crystal structure ligands into protein binding site and then refines the pose by repacking the side-chains and performing energy minimization with a Monte Carlo algorithm. We have assessed our method utilizing CSARdock 2012 and 2014 benchmark exercise datasets consisting of co-crystal structures from eight proteins. Our results revealed that ligand 3D shape similarity could substitute conformational and orientational sampling if at least one suitable co-crystal structure is available. Our method identified poses within 2 Å RMSD as the top-ranking pose for 85.7 % of the test cases. The median RMSD for our pose prediction method was found to be 0.81 Å and was better than methods performing extensive conformational and orientational sampling within target protein binding sites. Furthermore, our method was better than similar methods utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity for pose prediction.     

A comparative study on the application of hierarchical-agglomerative clustering approaches to organize outputs of reiterated docking runs

Reiterated runs of standard docking protocols usually provide a collection of possible binding modes rather than pinpoint a single solution. Usually, this ensemble is then ranked by means of an energy-based scoring function. However, since many degrees of approximation have to be introduced in the computation of the binding free energy, scoring functions cannot always rank the experimental pose among the top scorers. Cluster analysis might help to overcome this limit, provided that data clusterability has been earlier assessed. In this paper, first, we present a modified version of a test earlier developed by Hopkins to assess whether or not docking outputs show the natural tendency to be grouped in clusters. Then, we report the results of a comparative study on the application of different hierarchical-agglomerative cluster rules to partition docking outputs. The rule that was able to best manage the observed data was finally applied to the whole ensemble of poses collected from several docking tools. The combination of the average linkage rule with the cutting function developed by Sutcliffe and co-workers turned out to be an approach that meets all of the criteria required for a robust clustering protocol. Furthermore, a consensus clustering allowed us to identify the pose closest to the experimental one within a statistically significant cluster, whose number was always of few units.     

Exploring experimental sources of multiple protein conformations in structure-based drug design

Receptor flexibility must be incorporated into structure-based drug design in order to portray a more accurate representation of a protein in solution. Our approach is to generate pharmacophore models based on multiple conformations of a protein and is very similar to solvent mapping of hot spots. Previously, we had success using computer-generated conformations of apo human immunodeficiency virus-1 protease (HIV-1p). Here, we examine the use of an NMR ensemble versus a collection of crystal structures, and we compare back to our previous study based on computer-generated conformations. To our knowledge, this is the first direct comparison of an NMR ensemble and a collection of crystal structures to incorporate protein flexibility in structure-based drug design. To provide an accurate comparison between the experimental sources, we used bound structures for our multiple protein structure (MPS) pharmacophore models. The models from an NMR ensemble and a collection of crystal structures were both able to discriminate known HIV-1p inhibitors from decoy molecules and displayed superior performance over models created from single conformations of the protein. Although the active-site conformations were already predefined by bound ligands, the use of MPS allows us to overcome the cross-docking problem and generate a model that does not simply reproduce the chemical characteristics of a specific ligand class. We show that there is more structural variation between 28 structures in an NMR ensemble than 90 crystal structures bound to a variety of ligands. MPS models from both sources performed well, but the model determined using the NMR ensemble appeared to be the most general yet accurate representation of the active site. This work encourages the use of NMR models in structure-based design.     

Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking

Virtual screening by molecular docking has become established as a method for drug lead discovery and optimization. All docking algorithms make use of a scoring function in combination with a method of search. Two theoretical aspects of scoring function performance dominate operational performance. The first is the degree to which a scoring function has a global extremum within the ligand pose landscape at the proper location. The second is the degree to which the magnitude of the function at the extremum is accurate. Presuming adequate search strategies, a scoring function's location performance will dominate behavior with respect to docking accuracy: the degree to which a predicted pose of a ligand matches experimental observation. A scoring function's magnitude performance will dominate behavior with respect to screening utility: enrichment of true ligands over non-ligands. Magnitude estimation also controls pure scoring accuracy: the degree to which bona fide ligands of a particular protein may be correctly ranked. Approaches to the development of scoring functions have varied widely, with a number of functions yielding similarly high levels of performance relating to the location issue. However, even among functions performing equally well on location, widely varying performance is observed on the question of magnitude. In many cases, performance is good enough to yield high enrichments of true ligands versus non-ligands in screening across a wide variety of protein types. Generally, performance is not good enough to correctly rank among true ligands. Strategies for improvement are discussed.     

Relationship among ligand conformations in solution, in the solid state, and at the Hsp90 binding site: geldanamycin and radicicol

The unknown effects of a receptor's environment on a ligand's conformation presents a difficult challenge in predicting feasible bioactive conformations, particularly if the receptor is ill-defined. The primary hypothesis of this work is that a structure's conformational ensemble in solution presents viable candidates for protein binding. The experimental solution profile can be achieved with the NAMFIS (NMR analysis of molecular flexibility in solution) method, which deconvolutes the average NMR spectrum of small flexible molecules into individual contributing conformations with varying populations. Geldanamycin and radicicol are structurally different macrocycles determined by X-ray crystallography to bind to a common site on the cellular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Without benefit of a receptor structure, NAMFIS has identified the bioactive conformers of geldanamycin and radicicol in CDCl3 solution with populations of 4% and 21%, respectively. Conversely, docking the set of NAMFIS conformers into the unliganded proteins with GLIDE followed by MM-GBSA scoring reproduces the experimental crystallographic binding poses.     

Cross-docking study on InhA inhibitors: a combination of Autodock Vina and PM6-DH2 simulations to retrieve bio-active conformations

InhA, the NADH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the proposed main target of the first-line antituberculosis drug isoniazid (INH). INH activity is dependent on activation by the catalase peroxidase KatG, a Mtb enzyme whose mutations are linked to clinical resistance to INH. Other inhibitors of InhA that do not require any preliminary activation are known. The design of such direct potent inhibitors represents a promising approach to circumvent this resistance mechanism. An ensemble-docking process with four known InhA X-ray crystal structures and employing the Autodock Vina software was performed. Five InhA inhibitors whose bioactive conformations are known were sequentially docked in the substrate cavity of each protein. The efficiency of the docking was assessed and validated by comparing the calculated conformations to the crystallographic structures. For a same inhibitor, the docking results differed from one InhA conformation to another; however, docking poses that matched correctly or were very close to the expected bioactive conformations could be identified. The expected conformations were not systematically well ranked by the Autodock Vina scoring function. A post-docking optimization was carried out on all the docked conformations with the AMMP force field implemented on the VEGAZZ software, followed by a single point calculation of the interaction energy, using the MOPAC PM6-DH2 semi-empirical quantum chemistry method. The conformations were subsequently submitted to a PM6-DH2 optimization in partially flexible cavities. The resulting interaction energies combined with the multiple receptor conformations approach allowed us to retrieve the bioactive conformation of each ligand.     

Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation

Computational methods for docking ligands have been shown to be remarkably dependent on precise protein conformation, where acceptable results in pose prediction have been generally possible only in the artificial case of re-docking a ligand into a protein binding site whose conformation was determined in the presence of the same ligand (the “cognate” docking problem). In such cases, on well curated protein/ligand complexes, accurate dockings can be returned as top-scoring over 75% of the time using tools such as Surflex-Dock. A critical application of docking in modeling for lead optimization requires accurate pose prediction for novel ligands, ranging from simple synthetic analogs to very different molecular scaffolds. Typical results for widely used programs in the “cross-docking case” (making use of a single fixed protein conformation) have rates closer to 20% success. By making use of protein conformations from multiple complexes, Surflex-Dock yields an average success rate of 61% across eight pharmaceutically relevant targets. Following docking, protein pocket adaptation and rescoring identifies single pose families that are correct an average of 67% of the time. Consideration of the best of two pose families (from alternate scoring regimes) yields a 75% mean success rate.     

Interpretation of scoring functions using 3D molecular fields. Mapping the diacyl-hydrazine-binding pocket of an insect ecdysone receptor

A method is presented for the interpretation of receptor docking score values (rough measures of binding affinities) of ligands in terms of 3D molecular field interaction contributions. The FlexX and FlexX-Pharm methods were used to dock the structures of designed sets of ligands into the ligand-binding pocket of a selected receptor. In the next step the relationship was investigated between the FlexX and CScore scores and 3D molecular fields obtained for the docked conformations of the ligands, using the CoMFA (Comparative Molecular Field Analysis) and CoMSIA (Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis) methods. The approach yielded highly significant CoMFA and CoMSIA models demonstrating that a high portion of the variance in the docking score values of the ligands can be explained by steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bond donor and acceptor molecular field interaction contributions. The approach was exemplified by using the crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the ecdysone receptor (EcR) of the moth Heliotis virescens as well as virtual molecule libraries of analogues of known diacyl-hydrazine (DAH) type ecdysteroid agonists. By docking appropriately designed virtual compound libraries into the DAH binding pocket of EcR followed by CoMFA and CoMSIA of the docked conformations, hitherto unexplored regions of the receptor cavity could be mapped. By mapping the significant molecular field interaction contributions onto the model of the receptor-ligand complex, important receptor-ligand interactions could be highlighted that may help the design of novel highly scored receptor ligands. An advantage of the method is that no experimental biological activity data are required to exhaustively map the receptor-binding site.     

Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method

We describe a method for docking a ligand into a protein receptor while allowing flexibility of the protein binding site. The method employs a multistep procedure that begins with the generation of protein and ligand conformations. An initial placement of the ligand is then performed by computing binding site hotspots. This initial placement is followed by a protein side-chain refinement stage that models protein flexibility. The final step of the process is an energy minimization of the ligand pose in the presence of the rigid receptor. Thus the algorithm models flexibility of the protein at two stages, before and after ligand placement. We validated this method by performing docking and cross docking studies of eight protein systems for which crystal structures were available for at least two bound ligands. The resulting rmsd values of the 21 docked protein-ligand complexes showed values of 2 A or less for all but one of the systems examined. The method has two critical benefits for high throughput virtual screening studies. First, no user intervention is required in the docking once the initial binding site selection has been made in the protein. Second, the initial protein conformation generation needs to be performed only once for a given binding region. Also, the method may be customized in various ways depending on the particular scenario in which dockings are being performed. Each of the individual steps of the method is fully independent making it straightforward to explore different variants of the high level workflow to further improve accuracy and performance.     

Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein–ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2

A novel docking challenge has been set by the Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) in order to predict the pose and affinity ranking of a set of Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, prior to the public release of their bound X-ray structures and potencies. In a first phase, 36 agonists were docked to 26 Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures of the FXR receptor, and next rescored using the in-house developed GRIM method. GRIM aligns protein–ligand interaction patterns of docked poses to those of available PDB templates for the target protein, and rescore poses by a graph matching method. In agreement with results obtained during the previous 2015 docking challenge, we clearly show that GRIM rescoring improves the overall quality of top-ranked poses by prioritizing interaction patterns already visited in the PDB. Importantly, this challenge enables us to refine the applicability domain of the method by better defining the conditions of its success. We notably show that rescoring apolar ligands in hydrophobic pockets leads to frequent GRIM failures. In the second phase, 102 FXR agonists were ranked by decreasing affinity according to the Gibbs free energy of the corresponding GRIM-selected poses, computed by the HYDE scoring function. Interestingly, this fast and simple rescoring scheme provided the third most accurate ranking method among 57 contributions. Although the obtained ranking is still unsuitable for hit to lead optimization, the GRIM–HYDE scoring scheme is accurate and fast enough to post-process virtual screening data.     

Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy

Performance of small molecule automated docking programs has conceptually been divided into docking -, scoring -, ranking - and screening power, which focuses on the crystal pose prediction, affinity prediction, ligand ranking and database screening capabilities of the docking program, respectively. Benchmarks show that different docking programs can excel in individual benchmarks which suggests that the scoring function employed by the programs can be optimized for a particular task. Here the scoring function of Smina is re-optimized towards enhancing the docking power using a supervised machine learning approach and a manually curated database of ligands and cross docking receptor pairs. The optimization method does not need associated binding data for the receptor-ligand examples used in the data set and works with small train sets. The re-optimization of the weights for the scoring function results in a similar docking performance with regard to docking power towards a cross docking test set. A ligand decoy based benchmark indicates a better discrimination between poses with high and low RMSD. The reported parameters for Smina are compatible with Autodock Vina and represent ready-to-use alternative parameters for researchers who aim at pose prediction rather than affinity prediction.