A generalization of the Kruskal-Katona theorem

Let k_n ? k_n?1 ? … ? k₁ be positive integers and let ($\text{i}\text{j}$) denote the coefficient of xⁱ in $\text{Π}\text{r=1}\text{j}\text{(1 + x + x}{}^2\text{+ … + x}{}^{\mathrm{kr}}\text{)}$. For given integers l, m, where 1 ? l ? k_n + k_n?1 + … + k₁ and $\text{1 ? m ? (}\text{n}\text{n}\text{)}$, it is shown that there exist unique integers m(l), m(l ? 1),…, m(t), satisfying certain conditions, for which $\text{m = (}\text{m(l)}\text{l}\text{+ (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?1}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t}\text{)}$. Moreover, any m l-subsets of a multiset with k_i elements of type i, i = 1, 2,…, n, will contain at least $\text{(}\text{m(l)}\text{l?1}\text{) + (}\text{m(l?1)}\text{l?2}\text{) + … + (}\text{m(t)}\text{t?1}$ different (l ? 1)-subsets. This result has been anticipated by Greene and Kleitman, but the formulation there is not completely correct. If k₁ = 1, the numbers ($\text{j}\text{i}$) are binomial coefficients and the result is the Kruskal-Katona theorem.     

On maximal antichains containing no set and its complement

Let 1?k₁?k₂?…?k_n be integers and let S denote the set of all vectors x = (x₁, …, x_n with integral coordinates satisfying 0?x_i?k_i, i = 1,2, …, n; equivalently, S is the set of all subsets of a multiset consisting of k_i elements of type i, i = 1,2, …, n. A subset X of S is an antichain if and only if for any two vectors x and y in X the inequalities x_i?y_i, i = 1,2, …, n, do not all hold. For an arbitrary subset H of S, (i)H denotes the subset of H consisting of vectors with component sum i, i = 0, 1, 2, …, K, where K = k₁ + k₂ + …k_n. |H| denotes the number of vectors in H, and the complement of a vector x?S is (k₁-x₁, k₂-x₂, …, k_n -x_n). What is the maximal cardinality of an antichain containing no vector and its complement? The answer is obtained as a corollary of the following theorem: if X is an antichain, K is even and$\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}$ does not exceed the number of vectors in $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)S}$ with first coordinate different from k₁, then

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{K}\text{i≠}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K}\text{|(i)X|}\text{|(i)S|}\text{+}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K)X|}\text{|(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{K-1)S|}\text{?1}$

.     

Asymptotic independence of distributions of normalized order statistics of the underlying probability measure

Let n denote the sample size, and let r_i ∈ {1,…,n} fulfill the conditions r_i ? r_i?1 ≥ 5 for i = 1,…,k. It is proved that the joint normalized distribution of the order statistics Z_ri:n, i = 1,…,k, is independent of the underlying probability measure up to a remainder term of order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$. A counterexample shows that, as far as central order statistics are concerned, this remainder term is not of the order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ if r_i ? r_i?1 = 1 for i = 2,…,k.     

A characterization of the class of credibility matrices corresponding to a certain class of discrete distributions

Recently (see De Vylder & Goovaerts (1984), this issue) so called credibility matrices have been introduced and studied in the framework of general properties of matrices, such as non-negativity, total positivity etc. In the present note we characterize a class of credibility matrices generated by the normed sequence of functions (p_l, p_l,…, p_n) on K = [0, b] where $\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(θ) =?(i)g(θ)h}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(θ)}$, i=0, …, n, θ ? K, and where ?, g, h are nonnegative (eventually depending on n, n may be finite or infinite). For simplicity we suppose h to be monotonic and continuous.     

On the invariants of some Zi-extensions

Let k ? k₁ ? … ? K be a Z_i-extension. The relations of $\text{λ(}\text{K}\text{k}\text{)}$ and $\text{λ(}\text{KF}\text{F}\text{)}$ is studied, where $\text{F}\text{k}$ is a cyclic l-extension. If $\text{M}\text{k}$ is another Z_i-extension of k, it is shown that for i ? 0$\text{λ(}\text{Mk}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) = rl}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ C}$, under minimal additional hypotheses. Finally if $\text{MK}\text{k}$ has a unique totally ramified prime, and X_K is cyclic, it is shown that MK can contain at most one Z_i-extension with non-zero μ invariant.     

Note on lower bounds for the rank of a matrix

The following results are proved: Let A = (a_ij) be an n × n complex matrix, n ? 2, and let k be a fixed integer, 1 ? k ? n ? 1.(1) If there exists a monotonic G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1. (2) If A is irreducible and if there exists a G-function f = (f₁,…,f_n) such that for every subset of S of {1,…,n} consisting of k + 1 elements we have

$\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(A)<}\text{Π}\text{i∈S}\text{|a}{}_{\mathrm{ii}}\text{|,}$

then the rank of A is ? n ? k + 1 if k ? 2, n ? 3; it is ? n ? 1 if k = 1.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

On the separation power and the completion of partial latin squares

Let n and m be natural numbers, n ? m. The separation power of order n and degree m is the largest integer k = k(n, m) such that for every (0, 1)-matrix A of order n with constant linesums equal to m and any set of k 1's in A there exist (disjoint) permutation matrices P₁,…, P_m such that A = P₁ + … + P_m and each of the k 1's lies in a different P_i. Almost immediately we have 1 ? k(n, m) ? m ? 1, yet in all cases where the value of k(n, m) is actually known it equals m ? 1 (except under the somewhat trivial circumstances of k(n, m) = 1). This leads to a conjecture about the separation power, namely that k(n, m) = m ? 1 if $\text{m ? [}\text{n}\text{2}\text{] + 1}$. We obtain the bound $\text{k(n, m) ? m ? [}\text{n}\text{2}\text{] + 2}$, so that this conjecture holds for n ? 7. We then move on to latin squares, describing several equivalent formulations of the concept. After establishing a sufficient condition for the completion of a partial latin square in terms of the separation power, we can show that the Evans conjecture follows from this conjecture about the separation power. Finally the lower bound on k(n, m) allows us to show, after some calculations, that the Evans conjecture is true for orders n ? 11.     

Sperner systems consisting of pairs of complementary subsets

It was proved by Erdös, Ko, and Radó (Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.12 (1961), 313–320.) that if $\text{A}$ = {;A₁,…, A_l}; consists of k-subsets of a set with n > 2k elements such that A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ? for all i, j then l ? (_k?1^n?1). Schönheim proved that if A₁, …, A_l are subsets of a set S with n elements such that A_i ? A_j, A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ø and A_i ∪ A_j ≠ S for all i ≠ j then $\text{l ? (}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>[</mtext><mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext><mtext>]\; ?\; 1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$. In this note we prove a common strengthening of these results.     

On the number of combinations without unit separation

Let f(n, k) denote the number of ways of selecting k objects from n objects arrayed in a line with no two selected having unit separation (i.e., having exactly one object between them). Then, if $\text{n ? 2(k ? 1), f(n,k)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{κ}\text{(}\text{n?k+I?2i}\text{k?2i}\text{)}$ (where $\text{κ = [}\text{k}\text{2}\text{]}$). If n < 2(k ? 1), then f(n, k) = 0. In addition, f(n, k) satisfies the recurrence relation f(n, k) = f(n ? 1, k) + f(n ? 3, k ? 1) + f(n ? 4, k ? 2). If the objects are arrayed in a circle, and the corresponding number is denoted by g(n, k), then for n > 3, g(n, k) = f(n ? 2, k) + 2f(n ? 5, k ? 1) + 3f(n ? 6, k ? 2). In particular, if n ? 2k + 1 then $\text{(n,k)=(}\text{n?k}\text{k}\text{)+(}\text{n?k?1}\text{k?1}\text{)}$.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

A class of facet producing graphs for vertex packing polyhedra

We examine a family of graphs called webs. For integers n ? 2 and $\text{k, 1 ? k ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{n}$, the web W(n, k) has vertices V_n = {1, …, n} and edges {(i, j): j = i+k, …, i+n ? k, for i?V_n (sums mod n)}. A characterization is given for the vertex packing polyhedron of W(n, k) to contain a facet, none of whose projections is a facet for the lower dimensional vertex packing polyhedra of proper induced subgraphs of W(n, k). Simple necessary and sufficient conditions are given for W(n, k) to contain W(n′, k′) as an induced subgraph; these conditions are used to show that webs satisfy the Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture. Complements of webs are also studied and it is shown that if both a graph and its complement are webs, then the graph is either an odd hole or its complement.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

The interval number of a complete multipartite graph

The interval number of a graph G, denoted i(G), is the least positive integer t for which G is the intersection graph of a family of sets each of which is the union of at most t closed intervals of the real line $\text{R}$. Trotter and Harary showed that the interval number of the complete bipartite graph K(m,n) is $\text{?}\text{(mn + 1)}\text{(m + n)}\text{?}$. Matthews showed that the interval number of the complete multipartite graph K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) was the same as the interval number of K(n₁,n₂) when n₁ = n₂ = ? = n_p. Trotter and Hopkins showed that i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p)) ≤ 1 + i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₁≥n₂≥ ? ≥n_p. West showed that for each n ≥ 3, there exists a constant c_n so that if p ≥ c_n,n₁ = n²?n ?1, and n₂ = n₃ = ? n_p = n, then i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) = 1 + i(K(n₁, n₂)). In view of these results, it is natural to consider the problem of determining those pairs (n₁,n₂) with n₁ ≥ n₂ so that i(K(n₂,…,n_p)) = i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₂ ≥ n₃ ≥ ? ≥ n_p. In this paper, we present constructions utilizing Eulerian circuits in directed graphs to show that the only exceptional pairs are (n² ? n ? 1, n) for n ≥ 3 and (7,5).     

Permutations and successions

Let π = (π(1), π(2),…, π(n)) be a permutation on {1, 2, …, n}. A succession (respectively, ¹-succession) in π is any pair π(i), π(i + 1), where π(i + 1) = π(i) + 1 (respectively, π(i + 1) ≡ π(i) + 1 (mod n)), i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1. Let R(n, k) (respectively, $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$) be the number of permutations with k successions (respectively, ¹-successions). In this note we determine R(n, k) and $\text{R}{}^1\text{(n, k)}$. In addition, these notions are generalized to the case of circular permutations, where analogous results are developed.     

An application of L-functions of imaginary quadratic fields

Let F₁(x, y),…, F_2h+1(x, y) be the representatives of equivalent classes of positive definite binary quadratic forms of discriminant ?q (q is a prime such that q ≡ 3 mod 4) with integer coefficients, then the number of integer solutions of F_i(x, y) = n (i = 1,…, 2h + 1) can be calculated for each natural number n using L-functions of imaginary quadratic field $\text{Q}$((?q)^1/2).     

Hermite series estimates of a probability density and its derivatives

The following estimate of the pth derivative of a probability density function is examined: $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{k\; =\; 0}}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(x)}$, where h_k is the kth Hermite function and $\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= (}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{n}\text{)}$Σ_{i = 1}ⁿh_k^(p)(X_i) is calculated from a sequence X₁,…, X_n of independent random variables having the common unknown density. If the density has r derivatives the integrated square error converges to zero in the mean and almost completely as rapidly as O(n^?α) and O(n^?α log n), respectively, where $\text{α =}\text{2(r ? p)}\text{(2r + 1)}$. Rates for the uniform convergence both in the mean square and almost complete are also given. For any finite interval they are O(n^?β) and $\text{O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?\beta </mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{log}\text{n)}$, respectively, where $\text{β =}\text{(2(r ? p) ? 1)}\text{(2r + 1)}$.