Two characterizations of interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs

A graph G is m-partite if its points can be partitioned into m subsets V₁,…,V_m such that every line joins a point in V_i with a point in V_j, i ≠ j. A complete m-partite graph contains every line joining V_i with V_j. A complete graph K_p has every pair of its p points adjacent. The nth interchange graph I_n(G) of G is a graph whose points can be identified with the K_n+1's of G such that two points are adjacent whenever the corresponding K_n+1's have a K_n in common.Interchange graphs of complete 2-partite and 3-partite graphs have been characterized, but interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs for m > 3 do not seem to have been investigated. The main result of this paper is two characterizations of interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs for m ≥ 2.     

The graphs with only self-dual signings

Given a graph G, it is possible to attach positive and negative signs to its lines only, to its points only, or to both. The resulting structures are called respectively signed graphs, marked graphs and nets. The dual of each such structure is obtained by changing every sign in it. We determine all graphs G for which every suitable marked graph on G is self-dual (the M-dual graphs), and also the corresponding graphs G for signed graphs (S-dual) and for nets (N-dual.A graph G is M-dual if and only if G or ? is one of the graphs K_2m, 2K_m, mK₂, K_m + K₂ or 2C₄. The S-dual graphs are C₆, 2C₃, 2C₄, 2K_1n, 2nK₂, K_1,2n, nK_1,2, K_2n, K?_n and all graphs obtained from these by the addition of isolated points. Finally, the only N-dual graph other than -K_2n is 2K₂.     

Equivariant collapses and the homotopy type of iterated clique graphs

The clique graph K(G) of a simple graph G is the intersection graph of its maximal complete subgraphs, and we define iterated clique graphs by K⁰(G)=G, Kⁿ⁺¹(G)=K(Kⁿ(G)). We say that two graphs are homotopy equivalent if their simplicial complexes of complete subgraphs are so. From known results, it can be easily inferred that Kⁿ(G) is homotopy equivalent to G for every n if G belongs to the class of clique-Helly graphs or to the class of dismantlable graphs. However, in both of these cases the collection of iterated clique graphs is finite up to isomorphism. In this paper, we show two infinite classes of clique-divergent graphs that satisfy G?Kⁿ(G) for all n, moreover Kⁿ(G) and G are simple-homotopy equivalent. We provide some results on simple-homotopy type that are of independent interest.     

On Connected 2-K n -Residual Graphs

A graph G is said to be K _n -residual if for every point u in G, the graph obtained by removing the closed neighborhood of u from G is isomorphic to K _n . We inductively define a multiply-K _n -residual graph by saying that G is m-K _n -residual if the removal of the closed neighborhood of any vertex of G results in an (m – 1)-K _n -residual graphs. Erdös, Harary and Klawe [2] determined the minimum order of the m?K _n -residual graphs for all m and n, which are not necessarily connected, the minimum order of connected; K _n -residual graphs, all K _n -residual extremal graphs. They also stated some conjectures regarding the connected case. In this paper, we determine the minimum order of a connected 2-K _n -residual graph and specify the extremal graphs, expect for n = 3. In particular, we determining only one connected 2-K ₄-residual graph of minimal order, and show that there is a connected 2-K ₆-residual graph non isomorphic to K ₈ × K ₃ with minimum order. Finally we present and a revised version of the conjecture in [2].     

The clique operator on matching and chessboard graphs

Given positive integers m,n, we consider the graphs G_n and G_m,n whose simplicial complexes of complete subgraphs are the well-known matching complex M_n and chessboard complex M_m,n. Those are the matching and chessboard graphs. We determine which matching and chessboard graphs are clique-Helly. If the parameters are small enough, we show that these graphs (even if not clique-Helly) are homotopy equivalent to their clique graphs. We determine the clique behavior of the chessboard graph G_m,n in terms of m and n, and show that G_m,n is clique-divergent if and only if it is not clique-Helly. We give partial results for the clique behavior of the matching graph G_n.     

The Ramsey number for a cycle of length six versus a clique of order eight

For two given graphs G₁ and G₂, the Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) is the smallest integer n such that for any graph G of order n, either G contains G₁ or the complement of G contains G₂. Let C_m denote a cycle of length m and K_n a complete graph of order n. In this paper, it is shown that R(C₆,K₈)=36.     

A note on Ramsey multiplicity

If G₁ and G₂ are graphs and the Ramsey number r(G₁, G₂) = p, then the fewest number of G₁ in G and G₂ in ? (G complement) that occur in a graph G on p points is called the Ramsey multiplicity and denoted R(G₁, G₂). In [2, 3] the diagonal (i.e. G₁ = G₂) Ramsey multiplicities are derived for graphs on 3 and 4 points, with the exception of K₄. In this note an upper bound is established for R(K_s, K₁). Specifically, we show that R(K₄, K₄) ? 12.     

Clique-critical graphs: Maximum size and recognition

The clique graph of G, K(G), is the intersection graph of the family of cliques (maximal complete sets) of G. Clique-critical graphs were defined as those whose clique graph changes whenever a vertex is removed. We prove that if G has m edges then any clique-critical graph in K^-1(G) has at most 2m vertices, which solves a question posed by Escalante and Toft [On clique-critical graphs, J. Combin. Theory B 17 (1974) 170-182]. The proof is based on a restatement of their characterization of clique-critical graphs. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also show that the problem of recognizing clique-critical graphs is NP-complete.     

Laplacian integral graphs in S(a, b)

Let G_n,m be the family of graphs with n vertices and m edges, when n and m are previously given. It is well-known that there is a subset of G_n,m constituted by graphs G such that the vertex connectivity, the edge connectivity, and the minimum degree are all equal. In this paper, S(a, b)-classes of connected (a, b)-linear graphs with n vertices and m edges are described, where m is given as a function of a,b∈N/2. Some of them have extremal graphs for which the equalities above are extended to algebraic connectivity. These graphs are Laplacian integral although they are not threshold graphs. However, we do build threshold graphs in S(a, b).     

A lower bound for the interval number of a graph

The interval number i(G) of a graph G with n vertices is the lowest integer m such that G is the intersection graph of some family of sets I₁,…,I_n with every I_i being the union of at most m real intervals. In this article a lower bound for i(G) is proved followed by some considerations about the construction of graphs that are critical with respect to the interval number.     

Graphs omitting sums of complete graphs

For every finite m and n there is a finite set {G₁, …, G_l} of countable (m · K_n)-free graphs such that every countable (m · K_n)-free graph occurs as an induced subgraph of one of the graphs G_l © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Nombres de ramsey dans le cas orienté

Given two directed graphs G₁, G₂, the Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) is the smallest integer n such that for any partition {U₁,U₂} of the arcs of the complete symmetric directed graph K¹_n, there exists an integer i such that the partial graph generated by U_i contains G_i as a subgraph. In this article, we determine R(P?_m,D?_n) and R(D?_m,D?_n) for some values of m and n, where P?_m denotes the directed path having m vertices and D?_m is obtained from P?_m by adding an arc from the initial vertex of P?_m to the terminal vertex.     

On upper domination Ramsey numbers for graphs

The classical Ramsey number r(m,n) can be defined as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, β(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n, where β(G) denotes the independence number of a graph G. We define the upper domination Ramsey number u(m,n) as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or Γ(R)⩾n, where Γ(G) is the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set of a graph G. The mixed domination Ramsey number v(m,n) is defined to be the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n. Since β(G)⩽Γ(G) for every graph G, u(m,n)⩽v(m,n)⩽r(m,n). We develop techniques to obtain upper bounds for upper domination Ramsey numbers of the form u(3,n) and mixed domination Ramsey numbers of the form v(3,n). We show that u(3,3)=v(3,3)=6, u(3,4)=8, v(3,4)=9, u(3,5)=v(3,5)=12 and u(3,6)=v(3,6)=15.     

On the edge-connectivity and restricted edge-connectivity of a product of graphs

The product graph G_m*G_p of two given graphs G_m and G_p was defined by Bermond et al. [Large graphs with given degree and diameter II, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 36 (1984) 32-48]. For this kind of graphs we provide bounds for two connectivity parameters (λ and λ^′, edge-connectivity and restricted edge-connectivity, respectively), and state sufficient conditions to guarantee optimal values of these parameters. Moreover, we compare our results with other previous related ones for permutation graphs and cartesian product graphs, obtaining several extensions and improvements. In this regard, for any two connected graphs G_m, G_p of minimum degrees δ(G_m), δ(G_p), respectively, we show that λ(G_m*G_p) is lower bounded by both δ(G_m)+λ(G_p) and δ(G_p)+λ(G_m), an improvement of what is known for the edge-connectivity of G_m×G_p.     

Multicoloring and Mycielski construction

The generalized Mycielskians of graphs (also known as cones over graphs) are the natural generalization of the Mycielskians of graphs (which were first introduced by Mycielski in 1955). Given a graph G and any integer p?0, one can transform G into a new graph μ_p(G), the p-Mycielskian of G. In this paper, we study the kth chromatic numbers χ_k of Mycielskians and generalized Mycielskians of graphs. We show that χ_k(G)+1?χ_k(μ(G))?χ_k(G)+k, where both upper and lower bounds are attainable. We then investigate the kth chromatic number of Mycielskians of cycles and determine the kth chromatic number of p-Mycielskian of a complete graph K_n for any integers k?1, p?0 and n?2. Finally, we prove that if a graph G is a/b-colorable then the p-Mycielskian of G, μ_p(G), is (at+b^p+1)/bt-colorable, where . And thus obtain graphs G with m(G) grows exponentially with the order of G, where m(G) is the minimal denominator of a a/b-coloring of G with χ_f(G)=a/b.     

On vertex symmetric digraphs

The problem of how “near” we can come to a n-coloring of a given graph is investigated. I.e., what is the minimum possible number of edges joining equicolored vertices if we color the vertices of a given graph with n colors. In its generality the problem of finding such an optimal color assignment to the vertices (given the graph and the number of colors) is NP-complete. For each graph G, however, colors can be assigned to the vertices in such a way that the number of offending edges is less than the total number of edges divided by the number of colors. Furthermore, an Ω(epn) deterministic algorithm for finding such an n-color assignment is exhibited where e is the number of edges and p is the number of vertices of the graph (e?p?n). A priori solutions for the minimal number of offending edges are given for complete graphs; similarly for equicolored K_m in K_p and equicolored graphs in K_p.     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers

The graph Ramsey numberR(G,H) is the smallest integer r such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the largest star that can be removed from K_r such that the underlying graph is still forced to have a red G or a blue H. Thus, we introduce the star-critical Ramsey numberr_∗(G,H) as the smallest integer k such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r−K_1,r−1−k contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the star-critical Ramsey number for trees versus complete graphs, multiple copies of K₂ and K₃, and paths versus a 4-cycle. In addition to finding the star-critical Ramsey numbers, the critical graphs are classified for R(T_n,K_m), R(nK₂,mK₂) and R(P_n,C₄).     

The interval number of a complete multipartite graph

The interval number of a graph G, denoted i(G), is the least positive integer t for which G is the intersection graph of a family of sets each of which is the union of at most t closed intervals of the real line $\text{R}$. Trotter and Harary showed that the interval number of the complete bipartite graph K(m,n) is $\text{?}\text{(mn + 1)}\text{(m + n)}\text{?}$. Matthews showed that the interval number of the complete multipartite graph K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) was the same as the interval number of K(n₁,n₂) when n₁ = n₂ = ? = n_p. Trotter and Hopkins showed that i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p)) ≤ 1 + i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₁≥n₂≥ ? ≥n_p. West showed that for each n ≥ 3, there exists a constant c_n so that if p ≥ c_n,n₁ = n²?n ?1, and n₂ = n₃ = ? n_p = n, then i(K(n₁,n₂,…,n_p) = 1 + i(K(n₁, n₂)). In view of these results, it is natural to consider the problem of determining those pairs (n₁,n₂) with n₁ ≥ n₂ so that i(K(n₂,…,n_p)) = i(K(n₁,n₂)) whenever p ≥ 2 and n₂ ≥ n₃ ≥ ? ≥ n_p. In this paper, we present constructions utilizing Eulerian circuits in directed graphs to show that the only exceptional pairs are (n² ? n ? 1, n) for n ≥ 3 and (7,5).     

Properties of connected graphs having minimum degree distance

The degree distance of a connected graph, introduced by Dobrynin, Kochetova and Gutman, has been studied in mathematical chemistry. In this paper some properties of graphs having minimum degree distance in the class of connected graphs of order n and size m≥n−1 are deduced. It is shown that any such graph G has no induced subgraph isomorphic to P₄, contains a vertex z of degree n−1 such that G−z has at most one connected component C such that |C|≥2 and C has properties similar to those of G.For any fixed k such that k=0,1 or k≥3, if m=n+k and n≥k+3 then the extremal graph is unique and it is isomorphic to K₁+(K_1,k+1∪(n−k−3)K₁).     

The equivariant topology of stable Kneser graphs

The stable Kneser graph SG_n,k, n?1, k?0, introduced by Schrijver (1978) [19], is a vertex critical graph with chromatic number k+2, its vertices are certain subsets of a set of cardinality m=2n+k. Björner and de Longueville (2003) [5] have shown that its box complex is homotopy equivalent to a sphere, Hom(K₂,SG_n,k)?Sk. The dihedral group D2m acts canonically on SG_n,k, the group C₂ with 2 elements acts on K₂. We almost determine the (C₂×D2m)-homotopy type of Hom(K₂,SG_n,k) and use this to prove the following results.The graphs SG_2s,4 are homotopy test graphs, i.e. for every graph H and r?0 such that Hom(SG_2s,4,H) is (r−1)-connected, the chromatic number χ(H) is at least r+6.If k∉{0,1,2,4,8} and n?N(k) then SG_n,k is not a homotopy test graph, i.e. there are a graph G and an r?1 such that Hom(SG_n,k,G) is (r−1)-connected and χ(G)<r+k+2.