跨界创新联盟关联信用风险传染模型研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0130

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 169-175.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0130

跨界创新联盟关联信用风险传染模型研究

高长元, 张逸琳, 王京

哈尔滨理工大学经济与管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2020-03-06 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-13
作者简介:高长元(1960-),男,黑龙江鸡西人,教授,博士,研究方向:跨界创新联盟管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71774044,71672050,71804035);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(18yjc630177,19YJC630215);黑龙江省普通高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(LGYC2018JC058)

Research on Associated Credit Risk Contagion Model of Cross-border Innovation Alliance

GAO Chang-yuan, ZHANG Yi-lin, WANG Jing

School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150040, China

Received:2020-03-06 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 跨界创新联盟是企业创新过程中资源整合与共享的一种有效形式,但在带来企业创新资源共享效益的同时,联盟中复杂的关联关系也构成了联盟关联信用风险传染的新渠道。本文结合复杂网络理论与传染病模型,根据跨界创新联盟特点,在原有资产关联研究的基础上,综合考虑行业关联、资产关联和创新合作关联三种关联关系,改进了风险传播的传染病模型,并进行了数值仿真实验。结果表明:行业关联、资产关联和创新合作关联对跨界创新联盟关联信用风险传染阈值具有综合性影响,增加行业关联和创新合作关联因素,有利于提高关联信用风险传染阈值的精度。此外,资产关联度越高则感染成员密度越大;行业关联度越低,创新合作关联度越高则感染成员密度越小。

关键词: 跨界创新联盟, 关联信用风险, 复杂网络, 关联关系, 传染病模型

Abstract: Cross-border innovation alliance is an effective form of resource integration and sharing in the process of enterprise innovation. However, while bringing benefits of enterprise innovation resource sharing, the complex association relationship in the alliance also constitutes a new channel to the credit risk contagion of alliance. This paper combines the complex network theory with the model of infectious disease, according to the characteristics of cross-border innovation alliance, and on the basis of the original asset correlation study, comprehensively considers three correlation relationships of industry correlation, asset correlation and innovation cooperation correlation, improves the infectious disease model of risk transmission, and carries out numerical simulation experiments. The results show that industry correlation, asset correlation and innovation cooperation correlation have a comprehensive impact on the threshold of associated credit risk contagion with cross-border innovation alliance. Increasing the factors of industry correlation and innovation cooperation correlation is conducive to improving the accuracy of the threshold of associated credit risk contagion. In addition, the lower the industry correlation degree, the higher the innovation cooperation correlation degree, the smaller the density of infected members.

Key words: cross-border innovation alliance, associated credit risk, complex network, association relationship, infectious disease mode

中图分类号:

F830

高长元, 张逸琳, 王京. 跨界创新联盟关联信用风险传染模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 169-175.

GAO Chang-yuan, ZHANG Yi-lin, WANG Jing. Research on Associated Credit Risk Contagion Model of Cross-border Innovation Alliance[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(4): 169-175.

参考文献

[1] Danneels E. Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 21(4): 246-258.
[2] 张青.跨界协同创新运营机理及其案例研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(6):114-126.
[3] Akkerman S F, Bakker A. Boundary crossing and boundary objects[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2011, 81(2): 132-169.
[4] 张影.跨界创新联盟资源整合机制研究[D].哈尔滨理工大学,2019.
[5] Das S R, Duffie D, Kapadia N. Common failings: how corporate defaults are correlated[J]. Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(1): 93-117.
[6] 李永奎,周一懋,周宗放.基于不完全免疫情景下企业间关联信用风险传染及其仿真[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(01):57-64.
[7] 李永奎,周宗放.基于无标度网络的关联信用风险传染延迟效应[J].系统工程学报,2015,30(05):575-583.
[8] 李永奎,周宗放.基于小世界网络的企业间关联信用风险传染延迟效应[J].系统工程,2015,33(9):74-79.
[9] 陈庭强,王磊,曾倩茹.基于银企信用网络的交易对手风险传染研究[J].金融发展研究,2019(2):32-38.
[10] 周利国,何卓静,蒙天成.基于动态Copula的企业集团信用风险传染效应研究[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(2):71-82.
[11] 钱茜,周宗放,李永奎.管控策略对关联企业网络稳定状态的影响——基于关联信用风险传染的视角[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(6):21-29.
[12] Qian Q, Yang Y, Gu J. Information authenticity, spreading willingness and credit risk contagion—a dual-layer network perspective[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 536(C): 122519-1-122519-13.
[13] 吴洁,陈璐,盛永祥,车晓静,施琴芬.考虑风险的产业技术联盟知识共享演化博弈研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(11):36-42.
[14] Gulati R, Singh H. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination uncertainty and interdependence in strategic alliance[J]. Adminstrative Science Quarterty, 1998, 43(4): 781-814.
[15] 孙景,李峰.银行企业客户交易中的行业关联分析[J].上海金融,2008(1):18-21.
[16] 李林蔚.合作优势互补与联盟风险规避的前因及其效应研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(7):75-87.
[17] Chen T, Wang J, Liu H et al. Contagion model on counterparty credit risk in the CRT market by considering the heterogeneity of counterparties and preferential-random mixing attachment[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 520(C): 458-480.
[18] Wang L, Li S W, Chen T Q. Investor behavior, information disclosure strategy and counterparty credit risk contagion[J]. Chaos Solitons and Fractals, 2019, 119: 37-49.
[19] Barabasi A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
[20] 刘刚,梁晗,殷建瓴.风险投资声誉、联合投资与企业创新绩效——基于新三板企业的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2018(12):110-125.
[21] 范宏,刘春垚.基于资产组合相关的金融传染建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报,2019,31(6):1062-1069.
[22] 范纯龙,宋会敏,丁国辉.一种改进的SEIR网络谣言传播模型研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(3):86-91.
[23] Larcker D F, So E C, Wang C C Y. Boardroom centrality and firm performance[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, 55(2-3): 225-250.
[24] Xin S, Liang L I. Trade credit network with a guarantee mechanism and risk contagion[J]. Advances in Complex Systems, 2018, 12(8): 1850020-1-1850020-22.
[25] Phelps C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(4): 890-913.

跨界创新联盟关联信用风险传染模型研究

Research on Associated Credit Risk Contagion Model of Cross-border Innovation Alliance

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谢能刚, 代亚运, 王萌, 王璐, 暴伟. 考虑情感的三策略囚徒困境博弈模型与合作演化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 93-99.
[2]	祁凯, 彭程. 基于SEIR演化博弈模型的旅游公共危机演化与控制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 145-150.
[3]	郭宁, 郭鹏, 刘洋. 基于复杂网络的并联式项目群结构脆弱性评估[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 196-201.
[4]	李延双, 庄新田, 张伟平. 股指极端波动下中国股市复杂网络结构及中心性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 131-143.
[5]	徐凯, 周宗放, 钱茜. 考虑潜伏期的关联信用风险传染机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 190-197.
[6]	徐凯, 周宗放, 钱茜, 张凤英. 考虑个体保护意识的关联信用风险传染机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 197-206.
[7]	刘超, 郭亚东. 金融风险在股票市场的传染效应及联动行为分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 198-211.
[8]	陈芙英, 张建同, 罗梅丰. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线港口地位综合评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 157-164.
[9]	徐建中, 赵亚楠, 朱晓亚. 基于复杂网络演化博弈的企业低碳创新合作行为网络演化机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 70-79.
[10]	李存斌,张磊,刘定,孙润波. 基于复杂网络的能源互联网信息物理融合系统跨空间风险传递研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 139-147.
[11]	钱茜, 周宗放. 供应链上两类不同信用风险的关联及传染效应研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 78-86.
[12]	李斌, 韩菁. 市场导向、多主体协同与创新扩散:基于复杂网络的动态仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 67-73.
[13]	卞曰瑭, 刘夏群, 李金生. 基于网络混合学习策略的股市投资者行为演化模型及仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(11): 156-168.
[14]	刘超,郝丹辉,唐孝文,刘宸琦. 基于复杂网络的金融风险跨市场传导机制研究——以金融危机时期(2007~2009年)数据为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(8): 155-161.
[15]	钱茜, 周宗放. 考虑免疫性的关联信用风险的传染机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 132-137.